Direct Energy Regulated Services

Similar documents
ENMAX Power Corporation

Rule 005 RRT/DRT Amendments. Location: AUC Calgary Offices Time: 9:00 to 4:00

The City of Red Deer

Pivot Data Centres Inc.

EPCOR Energy Alberta GP Inc. Acting in its capacity as the general partner of EPCOR Energy Alberta Limited Partnership

2015 INTERIM REGULATED RATE OPTION TARIFF

WESTERN NATURAL GAS COMPANY LIMITED 1997 RETURN ON COMMON EQUITY

AUC Electronic Filing Services

Electricity Rates and Prices

AUC Information. How does Alberta s electric industry work?

Updated: November 30, 2007 Date: 30-Nov-07 SUMMARY OF DISCOUNTED CASH FLOW CALCULATIONS EB Project # Exhibit B Tab 4 Schedule 4 page 1 of 5

The Alberta Electricity Market Frequently Asked Questions

ATCO Gas (A Division of ATCO Gas and Pipelines Ltd.)

Rate Regulation Initiative

Alberta Electric Supply and Demand

THE ENMAX ENERGY BILL

EPCOR Distribution Inc.

1. Key Dates for Pool Settlement Where to find the Pool Statements On-going Reporting to Pool Participants 2

Attachment A. Electricity Rate Comparison Annual Report. May 1, 2011 Rates

International Financial Reporting Standard 8 Operating Segments

Exshaw Oil Corporation

How To Calculate 2007 Administration Fees In Alberta Energy And Utilities Board

Measuring Lost Profits Economic Damages on a Pretax Basis

Decision Utility Asset Disposition. November 26, 2013

EPCOR Energy Alberta Inc. Price Schedule Applicable to the REA (Rural Electrification Association)

Becoming a Contracting Party with NGX Sign Up Guide

STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS AND WORKING CAPITAL ANALYSIS

Service Quality and Reliability Performance Monitoring and Reporting for Regulated Rate Providers and Default Supply Providers

CANADIAN INTERNET REGISTRATION AUTHORITY DOMAIN NAME DISPUTE RESOLUTION POLICY

Fiscal Impact Analysis of the Annexation Proposed by the Town of Beaumont. Leduc County FINAL REPORT

Three Months Ended Nine Months Ended September 30 September 30

Ms. Abby Dorval Manager, Regulatory Affairs Northern Gateway Pipelines Inc. Calgary, AB T2P 3L8 Facsimile

REGULATORY ACCOUNTING GUIDELINES FOR TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO ELECTRICITY COMMISSION DRAFT FOR CONSULTATION

United States Small Business Administration Office of Hearings and Appeals

IN THE COURT OF QUEEN S BENCH OF ALBERTA JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF CALGARY

Project Management Agreement

3. Current Personal Financial Statement of all Principals of the business (form attached, Exhibit A make additional copies, if necessary)

COMPARISON OF ELECTRICITY PRICES IN MAJOR NORTH AMERICAN CITIES. Rates in effect April 1, 2011

June 19, 2015 Advice Letter 4809

Many directors of public enterprises

IGM FINANCIAL INC. REPORTS FOURTH QUARTER AND 2015 EARNINGS

KELT INCREASES PLANNED 2015 CAPITAL EXPENDITURES IN BRITISH COLUMBIA, PROVIDES OPERATIONS UPDATE AND ANNOUNCES $78.8 MILLION EQUITY FINANCINGS

Fiscal Note 2015 Biennium

IN THE MATTER OF the Utilities Commission Act, R.S.B.C. 1996, Chapter 473. and

Acquisition of Florida Shores Bancorp

Final Report Bid Evaluation and Selection Process For Wind-Generated Electricity Hydro-Quebec Distribution Call For Tenders Process.

BEFORE THE FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, DC RURAL BROADBAND EXPERIMENTS ) Docket Nos ,

APPLICATION SUBMISSION

STATE OF CONNECTICUT LABOR DEPARTMENT CONNECTICUT STATE BOARD OF LABOR RELATIONS

EPCOR Distribution & Transmission Inc.

NEW YORK INDEPENDENT SYSTEM OPERATOR, INC. WORKING CAPITAL POLICY AND PROCEDURE

APPENDIXB ONTARIO ENERGY BOARD GUIDELINES FOR ASSESSING AND REPORTING ON NATURAL GAS SYSTEM EXPANSION IN ONTARIO

Part A, Section 3: Small Business Lending General Instructions:

WESTERN REGION CORPORATION

Feel free to call us at the telephone numbers listed at the end of this letter.

Comments on Proposed National Instrument General Prospectus Requirements.

The Adjusted Present Value Approach to Valuing Leveraged Buyouts 1

How To Get A Court To Let A Bankruptcy Case To Go Through

Sample. Alberta Company. Your electricity bill. Bill date March 18, Your use this month. Your use this year. Important. You owe 121.

The Adjusted Present Value Approach to Valuing Leveraged Buyouts 1 Introduction

August 27, 2007 Advice Letter 2146-E. Advice Letter 2146-E is effective August 31, Thank you for your time.

Request for Proposal. Retail Consulting Services Date issued: Monday November 24, 2014 Close date: Wednesday December 10, 2014 at 12:00 pm MST

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELA WARE ANSWER AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES OF DEFENDANT IHOR FIGLUS

SECURITIES & EXCHANGE COMMISSION EDGAR FILING. NaturalShrimp Inc. Form: 8-K/A. Date Filed:

IN THE MATTER OF. and. Terasen Gas (Whistler) Inc Revenue Requirements and Rates Application O R D E R

Enbridge Income Fund Holdings Inc. Announces Second Quarter Results; Declares Monthly Dividend

CONCISE EXPLANATORY STATEMENT. Insurance Regulation 41 Annuity Disclosure

Sixth Statutory Managers Report

The Adjusted-Present-Value Approach to Valuing Leveraged Buyouts 1)

How To Measure An Rsp

INTERAGENCY BANK MERGER ACT APPLICATION GENERAL INFORMATION AND INSTRUCTIONS

INTERAGENCY BANK MERGER ACT APPLICATION. General Information and Instructions

March 1, 2007 ADVICE 2107-E (U 338-E) PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA ENERGY DIVISION

THE GROSSE POINTE PUBLIC SCHOOL SYSTEM Grosse Pointe, Michigan

RESIDENTIAL EXCHANGE PROGRAM SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT WITH CLARK PUBLIC UTILITIES ADMINISTRATOR S RECORD OF DECISION


THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL ONE ASHBURTON PLACE BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS 02108

October 22, Via . Industrial Customers Group c/o Robert Hobbs McBain Avenue Vancouver, BC V6L 3B1. Attention: Mr.

SUBCHAPTER 19. ANNUITY DISCLOSURE REGULATION [NEW]

Adoption of Form N-6: Registration Form for Variable Life Insurance

Dealing with Operating Leases in Valuation. Aswath Damodaran. Stern School of Business. 44 West Fourth Street. New York, NY 10012

Crown Resorts Limited Finance Committee Charter. Crown Resorts Limited ACN A public company limited by shares

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C FORM 10-K/A. Amendment No. 1

Review of Texas Credit Life and Credit Accident and Health Insurance and Recommendation for Presumptive Premium Rates

NET INCOME FOR 2014 OF 557 MILLION (2013: 431 MILLION) NET ASSET VALUE INCREASES BY 380 MILLION

All notices or correspondence regarding this claim must be forwarded to the following address:

Mail Stop June 28, Mr. Stephen L. Rohde President Premier Indemnity Holding Company 3001 N. Rocky Point Dr. Suite 200 Tampa, Florida 33607

City Manager means the Chief Administrative Officer of the City of St. Albert, as defined by the Alberta Municipal Government Act.

International Financial Reporting Standard 8 Operating Segments

FORM EIA-826 MONTHLY ELECTRIC SALES AND REVENUE WITH STATE DISTRIBUTIONS REPORT INSTRUCTIONS

Tejas Steel Supply, Inc.

NC General Statutes - Chapter 58 Article 60 1

INSURANCE REGULATION 41 ANNUITY DISCLOSURE

Get Connected. Construction Projects

Reviewing the Service s Job Aid on the Valuation of Noncontrolling Ownership Interests in S Corporations

Dear Fortis Shareholder: Strong results earnings and cash flow; capital expenditures on track

MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC. Non-GAAP Financial Measures

Fourth Quarter 2015 Results

Writing Cover Letters

Smith Affiliated Capital

Transcription:

Decision 20349-D01-2015 Adjustment to the Return Amount Collected Through the Energy Charge July 22, 2015

Alberta Utilities Commission Decision 20349-D01-2015 Adjustment to the Return Amount Collected Through the Energy Charge Proceeding 20349 July 22, 2015 Published by the: Alberta Utilities Commission Fifth Avenue Place, Fourth Floor, 425 First Street S.W. Calgary, Alberta T2P 3L8 Telephone: 403-592-8845 Fax: 403-592-4406 Website: www.auc.ab.ca

Contents 1 Introduction... 1 2 CCA comments... 2 3 DERS reply comments... 3 4 Commission findings... 3 5 Order... 6 Appendix 1 Proceeding participants... 7 Appendix 2 Calculation of equity component of return on working capital for 2011 and allocation to rate classes... 8 Appendix 3 Calculation of DERS non-energy return collected in 2012, 2013 and 2014... 9 List of tables Table 1. Rate class equity component of working capital (charge per site per day)... 4 Table 2. Summary of the collection of DERS return ($/MWh after-tax), effective August 2015... 5

Alberta Utilities Commission Calgary, Alberta Adjustment to the Return Amount Collected Through Decision 20349-D01-2015 the Energy Charge Proceeding 20349 1 Introduction 1. On April 14, 2015, (DERS) filed an application with the Alberta Utilities Commission in response to a Commission s direction in Decision 2941- D01-2015. 1 Decision 2941-D01-2015 set out the Commission s findings with respect to DERS 2014-2018 energy price setting plan (EPSP). In that decision, the Commission provided the following direction with respect to the amount of return currently collected through DERS nonenergy rates at paragraphs 257 and 258: 257. Accordingly, the Commission approves the following all-in after tax return amounts based on Dr. Evans report, as updated by Mr. Dalton: $2.83/MWh (megawatt hour) for DERS; 2.44/MWh for EEC [ENMAX Energy Corporation]; and $2.51/MWh for EEA [EPCOR Energy Alberta GP Inc.]. Because these amounts are considered all-in, in order to determine how much should be collected through the energy charge, it is necessary for the Commission to know how much is currently being collected through the non-energy charges of the three RRO (regulated rate option) providers, expressed as a $/MWh amount. The Commission is aware that DERS collects some of its return through its non-energy charge, as represented by the equity component of necessary working capital. 258. The Commission directs DERS and EEA, as part of their compliance filings, and EEC, as part of its filing of a new proposal for its 2014-2018 EPSP, to file information that shows how much of their current return is being collected through their non-energy rates, and express this figure as a $/MWh amount. The Commission further directs the RRO providers to provide an explanation for the volume used in the calculation for $/MWh in their non-energy rates. 2. On April 15, 2015, DERS filed an update to its application, revising an attachment to its original application. In the updated application, DERS provided a calculation of the $/MWh current return amount that was collected through its non-energy rates for each of the years 2011-2014. DERS added that this amount is embedded in the Working Capital component of the Administrative Fee that DERS charges on a per site basis, not as a $/MWh. 2 3. This decision provides the Commission s determinations on the updated after-tax return amount to be included in DERS monthly energy charge on a go-forward basis. This amount must reflect the combination of the return amount collected through the energy charges and the 1 2 Decision 2941-D01-2015:, ENMAX Energy Corporation and EPCOR Energy Alberta GP Inc. Regulated Rate Tariff and Energy Price Setting Plans Generic Proceeding: Part B Final Decision, Proceeding 2941, Application 1610120-1, March 10, 2015. Exhibit 20349-X0005. Decision 20349-D01-2015 (July 22, 2015) 1

non-energy rates to arrive at the total all-in after-tax return of $2.83/MWh, as approved by the Commission in Decision 2941-D01-2015. 4. The Commission issued a notice of application on April 15, 2015. In the notice, the Commission stated that it intended to use the information provided in response to the Commission s direction to update and determine the portion of the reasonable return amount for DERS that is collected through its energy charge in an expedited manner. Prior to making its determinations on the adjustment to the return amount collected through the energy charge, the Commission invited parties to submit any information requests (IRs) to DERS by April 29, 2015. 5. On April 16, 2015, the Commission received a statement of intent to participate (SIP) from the Consumers Coalition of Alberta (CCA). 6. On April 29, 2015, the Commission issued IRs to DERS. The CCA did not submit IRs to DERS. 7. DERS responded to the Commission IRs on May 13, 2015, and submitted revisions to its IR responses on May 26 and May 27, 2015. 8. On June 4, 2015, the Commission set out further process steps on the adjustment of the return amount through the energy charge and invited closing comments and reply comments from parties, which were due on June 10, 2015, and June 16, 2015, respectively. The Commission received comments from the CCA, and reply comments from DERS. 9. The Commission considers the record for this proceeding to have closed on July 8, 2015, with DERS submission of an additional revised response to an information request. 10. In reaching its determinations with respect to the portion of the return amount DERS will collect through its energy charge, the Commission has considered all relevant materials comprising the record of this proceeding with respect to the adjustment of return, including the submissions provided by each party. Accordingly, references in this decision to specific parts of the record are intended to assist the reader in understanding the Commission s reasoning related to a particular matter and should not be taken as an indication that the Commission did not consider all relevant portions of the record with respect to a particular matter. 2 CCA comments 11. The CCA submitted that in recognizing the total return of $2.83/MWh to be collected by DERS, the Commission should consider paragraph 206 of Decision 2941-D01-2015, which explained that the return was based on 2013 adjusted revenue information: 206. Following the calculations used by the board in Decision 2006-107 and Decision 2006-108, Mr. Dalton, using the adjusted revenue information for the year 2013 and assuming an income tax rate of 25 per cent, calculated the following after-tax return amounts: EEA - $2.51/MWh; DERS - $2.83/MWh; EEC - $2.44/MWh. Mr. Dalton reiterated that the final calculations should be based on forward looking revenue projections exclusive of return amounts, LAFs [local access fees] and MFFs [municipal franchise fees]. The before tax return amounts will need to be calculated by grossing up the after-tax return amounts for the income tax effects or payment in lieu of taxes (PILOT), where appropriate. In its argument, the UCA, also assuming a 25 per cent tax 2 Decision 20349-D01-2015 (July 22, 2015)

rate, converted the after-tax return amounts to the following pre-tax amounts: EEA - $3.35/MWh; DERS - $3.77/MWh; EEC - $3.25/MWh. [footnotes omitted] 12. Since the Commission used the 2013 information to fix DERS total return amount, the calculation of the return that is being collected through the non-energy charge should also use the same underlying 2013 billing determinants for determination of DERS non-energy amount. If different year site counts and volume data other than the 2013 adjusted information on which the Commission based the approved $2.83/MWh numbers are used, there would be a mismatch between the total return dollars per MWh determined by the Commission and the amount calculated as being collected through the non-energy charge on a $/MWh basis. 13. In the CCA s view, if the Commission considers that a year or set of years, other than 2013, is reasonable, then the total return of $2.83/MWh would need to be revised to reflect the calculation of return dollars for DERS based on that year s or years forecasts for revenues and billing determinants. The calculation of the return that is being collected through the non-energy charge, expressed as a $/MWh charge, should also use the billing determinants applicable to the corresponding year or set of years. 3 DERS reply comments 14. In its reply, DERS maintained that it has accepted the risk on all elements of its non-energy costs in Proceeding 2957; 3 therefore, the calculation of the current return amount that is collected through its non-energy rates should be based on the forecast working capital for 2012 through 2016, divided by the forecast load for the same years. DERS provided this forecast information in Attachment DERS-AUC-2015APR29-001. 4 4 Commission findings 15. In Section 4.2 of Decision 2957-D01-2015, 5 the Commission rejected DERS forecast amounts for 2012, 2013 and 2014 and, with the exception of three cost components previously determined in Decision 2012-343, 6 directed DERS to use actuals instead for these forecast amounts over these years. 7 Consistent with the Commission s findings in Decision 2957-D01-2015 on the use of actuals for 2012 to 2014 revenue requirements, the Commission does not agree with DERS view that the non-energy return calculation should be based on DERS 2012-2016 regulated rate tariff (RRT) forecasts because these forecasts were not approved. 16. Therefore, in consideration of Decision 2957-D01-2015 and the record of this proceeding, the Commission finds it reasonable that the portion of the return amount collected through DERS non-energy rates also be determined based on actuals for the period 2012 to 2014. 3 4 5 6 7 Proceeding 2957: Limited Default Rate Tariff (DRT) and RRT application. Exhibit 20349-X0010. Decision 2957-D01-2015: 2012-2016 Default Rate Tariff and Regulated Rate Tariff, Proceeding 2957, Application 1610155-1, July 7, 2015. Decision 2012-343:, 2012-2014 Default Rate Tariff and Regulated Rate Tariff, Proceeding 1454, Application 1607696-1, December 21, 2012. Decision 2957-D01-2015, paragraph 78. Decision 20349-D01-2015 (July 22, 2015) 3

17. In order to determine the portion of the return amount collected through DERS nonenergy rates in 2012, 2013 and 2014, the Commission considered the following information included on the record of this proceeding: the daily non-energy RRT rates charged by DERS in 2012, 2013 and 2014 the amount of the daily non-energy RRT rates charged to DERS customers in 2012, 2013 and 2014 attributed to the return component the actual number of RRT sites billed daily by DERS in 2012, 2013 and 2014 the actual RRT energy sales in 2012, 2013 and 2014 18. The Commission notes that DERS was on interim non-energy RRT rates for 2012, 2013 and 2014. The interim non-energy RRT rates for these three years were the same as the final approved non-energy RRT rates for 2011. The interim non-energy rates were approved in Decision 2010-317. 8 Using information from Decision 2010-317 and from the initial 2009-2011 default rate tariff (DRT) and RRT application, 9 the Commission is able to calculate the return component of the final daily non-energy RRT rates in 2011. Details of the Commission s calculations are included in Appendix 2 to this decision, and the resulting amounts are included in the following table: Table 1. Rate class Rate class equity component of working capital (charge per site per day) Cents per day per site Residential (E1) $0.0030 Small General (E2) 0.0111 Large General (E3) 0.0654 Oilfield (E4) 0.0151 Farm (E5) 0.0063 Lighting (E6) 0.0007 Irrigation (E7) 0.0173 19. In response to DERS-AUC-2015APR29-001(n) in this proceeding, DERS provided information related to the actual number of RRT sites billed by DERS on a daily basis in 2012, 2013 and 2014. 10 Using this information, the information from Table 1 and the total energy sales for each of 2012, 2013 and 2014, the Commission calculated the actual amount of return DERS collected through its non-energy rates in 2012, 2013 and 2014, expressed in $/MWh. Details of these calculations are included in Appendix 3 to this decision. The resulting amount is $0.18/MWh. 8 9 10 Decision 2010-317: 2009/2010/2011 Default Rate Tariffs and Regulated Rate Tariffs Compliance Filing, Proceeding 468, Application 1605840-1, July 8, 2010. This initial application was assigned Proceeding 149, Application 1600749-1. Exhibit 20349-X0018, DERS-AUC-2015APR29-001(n) Final, July 8, 2015. 4 Decision 20349-D01-2015 (July 22, 2015)

20. Details of the adjustment required to DERS after-tax return amount to be included in its monthly energy charges are shown in the following table: 11 Table 2. Summary of the collection of DERS return ($/MWh after-tax), effective August 2015 Return component Current Adjustment Resulting amounts Collected through the energy charge 1.75 0.90 2.65 Collected through the non-energy rates 0.18 0.18 Total 1.93 2.83 Approved all-in return 2.83 2.83 Shortfall (0.90) 0.00 21. The Commission disagrees with the CCA s recommendation that the Commission use the corresponding information from 2013 to determine DERS non-energy return amount. While the CCA s approach would result in matching of the total return dollars in MWh and the adjustment to be collected, the Commission considers that any adjustment to the after-tax return amount collected through DERS energy charge starting in August 2015, must take into account the actual amounts approved for collection through the non-energy charge. As stated above, the Commission finds that using DERS actuals for the period 2012-2014 is reasonable for determining the portion of the return amount collected through DERS non-energy rates. 22. Based on the foregoing, the Commission approves an adjustment of $0.90/MWh to the after-tax return component of DERS energy charge, effective with the monthly energy charges for August 2015. These charges are to be filed with the Commission five business days prior to August 1, 2015. The total approved after-tax return amount to be included in the energy charge is $2.65/MWh, and this will be effective until the Commission otherwise directs. 11 On July 20, 2015, the Commission issued a letter to DERS requesting it to confirm the correctness of Commission staff calculations of DERS non-energy return. DERS submitted its response on the same day, stating that it disagreed with the return on equity and return on debt assumptions used in the Commission s calculations (Exhibit 20349-X0022). On July 21, 2015, DERS retracted its response, maintaining that it agreed with the calculations compiled by the Commission (Exhibit 20349-X0023). On July 21, 2015, the Commission contacted the CCA to inquire whether the CCA had further comments on the Commission s calculations. The CCA replied via email, on the same day, stating that it had reviewed the Commission s calculations and assumptions and confirmed that they appeared to be correct (Exhibit 20349-X0024). Decision 20349-D01-2015 (July 22, 2015) 5

5 Order 23. It is hereby ordered that: (1) shall reflect an after-tax return amount of $2.65/MWh as part of its monthly energy charges, to be included in its monthly energy charges for August 2015. Dated on July 22, 2015. Alberta Utilities Commission (original signed by) Henry van Egteren Commission Member 6 Decision 20349-D01-2015 (July 22, 2015)

Appendix 1 Proceeding participants Name of organization (abbreviation) counsel or representative Company (DERS) Company Consumers Coalition of Alberta (CCA) Alberta Utilities Commission Commission panel H. van Egteren, Commission member Commission staff L. Desaulniers (Commission counsel) B. Clarke D. Mitchell C. Pham C. Arnot C. Burt Decision 20349-D01-2015 (July 22, 2015) 7

Appendix 2 Calculation of equity component of return on working capital for 2011 and allocation to rate classes (return to text) Appendix 2 - Calculation of return component (consists of 1 page) 8 Decision 20349-D01-2015 (July 22, 2015)

Appendix 3 Calculation of DERS non-energy return collected in 2012, 2013 and 2014 (return to text) Appendix 3 - Calculation of DERS non-energy return (consists of 1 page) Decision 20349-D01-2015 (July 22, 2015) 9

Appendix 2 - Calculation of return component of interim daily non-energy RRT rates for 2012, 2013 and 2014 Page 1 of 1 Regulated Rate Tariff Calculation of equity component of return on working capital for 2011 and allocation to rate classes 2011 Forecast approved non-energy rates composition Equity component of working capital 2011 forecast approved working capital - expense items $ 4,413,000 (Line 17, Schedule 5.2.3 - Appendix 4 of Decision 2010-317) 2011 forecast approved working capital - adjustments $ 2,312,000 (Line 24, Schedule 5.2.3 - Appendix 4 of Decision 2010-317) $ 6,725,000 2011 approved rate of return on working capital 7.09% (Line 18 and Line 25, Schedule 5.2.3 - Appendix 4 of Decision 2010-317) 2011 forecast approved working capital $ 476,802.50 Breakdown of approved rate of return for 2011 Debt: 62% X 5.56% 3.44% (ID 149: Exhibit 18.01, Response to AUC-DERS-065 (a)) Equity 38% X 9.60% 3.65% (ID 149: Exhibit 18.01, Response to AUC-DERS-065 (a)) 7.09% Equity Component of 2011 forecast approved working capital $ 245,328.00 51.43% Debt component of 2011 forecast approved working capital $ 231,657.42 48.57% $ 476,985.42 100.00% RRT Allocation of 2011 Approved Revenue Requirement for Working Capital Small Large Residential General General Oilfield Farm Lighting Irrigation E1 E2 E3 E4 E5 E6 E7 Total Non-energy Costs: Working Capital $ 225,600 $ 93,500 $ 18,100 $ 2,600 $ 94,600 $ 4,400 $ 600 $ 439,400 (Line 61, Schedule 6.2 - Appendix 4 of Decision 2010-317) Energy Costs: Working Capital $ 19,400 $ 8,100 $ 1,600 $ 200 $ 8,100 $ 100 $ 100 $ 37,600 (Line 77, Schedule 6.2 - Appendix 4 of Decision 2010-317) Total - Working Capital $ 245,000 $ 101,600 $ 19,700 $ 2,800 $ 102,700 $ 4,500 $ 700 $ 477,000 Equity Share Percentage 51.43% 51.43% 51.43% 51.43% 51.43% 51.43% 51.43% 51.43% Equity Share - Dollars $ 126,011 $ 52,256 $ 10,132 $ 1,440 $ 52,822 $ 2,314 $ 360 $ 245,335 After-tax revenue requirement 2011 Approved # of total sites 1,369,745 154,854 5,095 3,133 273,671 115,468 679 1,922,645 (Lines 17-23, Schedule 3.2.1 - Appendix 4 of Decision 2010-317) Average number of sites 114,145 12,905 425 261 22,806 9,622 97 160,261 # of days 365 365 365 365 365 365 214 (Lines 8-14, Schedule 7.2 - Appendix 4 of Decision 2010-317) Equity share of W/C - charge per site per day $ 0.0030 $ 0.0111 $ 0.0654 $ 0.0151 $ 0.0063 $ 0.0007 $ 0.0173 This is the after-tax amount. Decision 20349-D01-2015 (July 22, 2015)

Appendix 3 - Calculation of DERS' non-energy return for 2012, 2013 and 2014 Page 1 of 1 Calculation of return amount collected through non-energy rates and expressed in $/Mwh RRT Actual Administration Revenue Return component of daily rates return from rate classes throughout the year Actual Administration Revenue $ 16,384,836 $ 15,786,800 $ 15,292,003 Weighted Simple Residential E1 2012 2013 2014 2012 2013 2014 Average Average Residential Administration Revenue $12,238,619 $11,796,816 $11,106,070 Daily Residential Admin Charge Actual $0.285 $0.285 $0.285 $0.0030 Actual Residential Site Days 42,942,521 41,392,336 38,968,665 $130,115 $125,418 $118,074 Small General E2 2012 2013 2014 Small General Administration Revenue $1,479,616 $1,410,223 $1,489,217 Daily Small General Admin Charge Actual $0.313 $0.313 $0.313 $0.0111 Actual Small General Site Days 4,727,208 4,505,505 4,757,882 $52,467 $50,006 $52,807 Large General E3 2012 2013 2014 Large General Adminstration Revenue $98,913 $94,922 $91,035 Daily Large General Admin Charge Actual $0.585 $0.585 $0.585 $0.0654 Actual Large General Site Days 169,082 162,260 155,615 $11,058 $10,612 $10,177 Oilfield E4 2012 2013 2014 Oilfield Administration Revenue $27,392 $27,261 $25,486 Daily Oilfield Admin Charge Actual $0.254 $0.254 $0.254 $0.0151 Actual Oilfield Site Days 107,843 107,327 100,339 $1,628 $1,621 $1,515 Farm E5 2012 2013 2014 Farming Administration Revenue $2,462,103 $2,393,295 $2,461,830 Daily Farm Admin Charge Actual $0.303 $0.303 $0.303 $0.0063 Actual Farm Site Days 8,125,752 7,898,663 8,124,851 $51,192 $49,762 $51,187 Lighting E6 2012 2013 2014 Lighting Adminstration Revenue $72,866 $59,194 $113,989 Daily Lighting Admin Charge Actual $0.044 $0.044 $0.044 $0.0007 Actual Lighting Site Days 1,656,035 1,345,321 2,590,657 $1,087 $883 $1,701 Irrigation E7 2012 2013 2014 Irrigation Administration Revenue $5,328 $5,089 $4,377 Daily Irrigation Admin Charge Actual $0.338 $0.338 $0.338 $0.0173 Actual Irrigation Site Days 15,763 15,056 12,950 $273 $260 $224 total return for the year total return collected in any one year $247,821 $238,562 $235,686 $722,068 total energy sales ( Source: Exhibit 20349-X0010) 1,417,376 1,362,708 1,332,252 4,112,336 return collected through non-energy charges in $/MWh $0.17 $0.18 $0.18 $0.18 $0.18 Decision 20349-D01-2015 (July 22, 2015)