Settlement Agreement Regarding Federal Lawsuit



Similar documents
Case 3:11-cv RCJ-WGC Document 96 Filed 12/18/14 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Case 4:08-cv RP-CFB Document 245 Filed 09/02/15 Page 1 of 10

Case 1:14-cv FDS Document 64 Filed 01/29/16 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

SETTLEMENT AND RELEASE AGREEMENT. to herein individually as a "Party" and collectively as the "Parties." RECITALS

Case3:12-cv CRB Document265 Filed07/20/15 Page2 of 12

Case 1:11-cv LGS Document 151 Filed 06/08/15 Page 1 of 7 : : : : :

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND MUTUAL RELEASE RECITALS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS PEORIA DIVISION

Cash Advance Agreement (Case ID: )

ORDER APPROVING SETTLEMENT AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY INTEREST SALE AND ASSIGNMENT AGREEMENT

Case: 1:13-cv Document #: 66 Filed: 06/12/15 Page 1 of 11 PageID #:662

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE OF ALL CLAIMS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Case 2:10-cv IPJ Document 292 Filed 05/27/15 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION

Case 2:06-cv FCD-KJM Document 220 Filed 06/02/2009 Page 1 of 11

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA

Case: 1:12-cv Document #: 137 Filed: 07/29/14 Page 1 of 11 PageID #:1365

Case 1:12-cv VEC Document 206 Filed 10/15/15 Page 1 of 10 USDC SDNY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC #:

STATE OF NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND INDUSTRY DIVISION OF MORTGAGE LENDING * * * STIPULATED SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

Case 1:12-md PB Document 93 Filed 06/05/15 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT, FOURTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR DUVAL COUNTY, FLORIDA.

Case 1:11-md RGS Document 396 Filed 12/06/13 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS ) ) ) ) ) )

Retail Gas Supplier Tariff Service Agreement

Case 1:09-cv JPO-JCF Document 362 Filed 08/04/15 Page 1 of 8 : : : : : : EXHIBIT A

~INAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

~[PR~] ORDER PRELIMINARILY APPROVING SETTLEMENT AND PROVIDING FOR CLASS NOTICE

Courtroom: 19 FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS COUNTY DEPARTMENT CHANCERY DIVISION

Case4:13-cv KAW Document64 Filed12/16/14 Page1 of 5

PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT

ELECTRONIC DATA INTERCHANGE (EDI) TRADING PARTNER AGREEMENT THIS ELECTRONIC DATA INTERCHANGE TRADING PARTNER AGREEMENT

ELMWOOD NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION V. CITY OF BERKELEY ALAMEDA COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT CASE NO. RG MUTUAL RELEASE AND SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

Master Software Purchase Agreement

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN RE: SKECHERS TONING SHOE : CASE: 3:11-md TBR PRODUCT LIABILITY LITIGATION : : MDL No.: 2308

Case 1:12-cv ADS-AKT Document 88-1 Filed 12/16/13 Page 56 of 64 PageID #: 1018 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

cv UHL

THESE FORMS ARE NOT A SUBSTITUTE FOR LEGAL ADVICE.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAI`I ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT. This is an AGREEMENT TO SETTLE AND FOR RELEASE OF CLAIMS (the

: : before this court (the Court Annexed Mediation Program ); and

State of California - Department of Corporations

Case 1:10-cv KMM Document 20 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/20/2011 Page 1 of 9

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND MUTUAL GENERAL RELEASE. This Settlement Agreement and Mutual General Release ( Agreement ) is entered into

THIS SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT (the Agreement ) is entered into by the States

[FORM OF AGREEMENT FOR U.S.- PLEASE INSERT INFORMATION WHERE INDICATED] ELECTRONIC DATA INTERCHANGE (EDI) TRADING PARTNER AGREEMENT

The Enforceability of Mediated Settlement Agreements. By: Thomas J. Smith The Law Offices of Thomas J. Smith San Antonio, Texas

reg Doc Filed 04/23/12 Entered 04/23/12 15:12:23 Main Document Pg 1 of 6

How To Settle A Lawsuit Against The City Of Naperville

NC General Statutes - Chapter 44A Article 3 1

mg Doc 1761 Filed 12/12/13 Entered 12/12/13 16:40:33 Main Document Pg 1 of 9 : : : (Jointly Administered) : Chapter 11 : : : :

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN. v. Case No. 2:11-CV-00910

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT. This Settlement Agreement (hereafter Agreement ) is entered into by

PRACTICE GUIDELINES MEMORANDUM. RE: Sample Bankruptcy Motions and Orders for Personal Injury Practitioners and Trustees

REGULATORY SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT. THIS REGULATORY SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT (the Regulatory Settlement

MARYLAND ELECTRONIC DATA INTERCHANGE (EDI) TRADING PARTNER AGREEMENT RECITALS. Section 1. Prerequisites

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT. WHEREAS, on or about September 22, 2009 (the "Filing Date"), Long Island

Should the commission desire to adopt the proposed settlement agreement, the following resolution is presented for your consideration:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN

2 of 8 10/18/2012 1:12 PM

BOND AGREEMENT: IRREVOCABLE LETTER OF CREDIT FOR COMPLETION OF IMPROVEMENTS

Case 3:06-cv MJR-DGW Document 526 Filed 07/20/15 Page 1 of 8 Page ID #13631 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

As used herein, capitalized terms have the following respective meanings:

PIERCE COUNTY DISTRICT COURT 930 TACOMA AVE S, Room 239, TACOMA, Small Claims Information

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE OF ALL CLAIMS

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT This settlement agreement ( Agreement ) is entered into between Wells Fargo

How To Take Down A Shark Video From Youtube.Com

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE No. 09-CV JCC

STANDARD CONTINGENT FEE REPRESENTATION AGREEMENT FOR INDIVIDUALS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA. Plaintiff DIVISION "D" JUDGE McNAMARA v.

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

Form: Action by Unanimous Written Consent of the Board of Directors in Lieu of Organizational Meeting (Delaware Corporation) Description:

Case 1:13-cv LGS Document 131 Filed 06/24/15 Page 1 of 14 ) ) ) ) ORDER GRANTING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF SETTLEMENT

Case5:12-cv EJD Document136 Filed01/29/15 Page1 of 7

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

ELECTRONIC TRANSMITTAL OF SIGNATURE AGREEMENT

POWER PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT [NON-INCENTIVE]

Case 2:02-cv TS Document 602 Filed 06/19/14 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF UTAH ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Real Estate Salesman Agreement (Independent Contractor)

Case 2:14-cv JFC Document 43 Filed 07/16/15 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

SONIX MEDICAL RESOURCES, INC. et al Chapter 11

How To Get Out Of A Policy With Great Southern Insurance Company

MONTANA EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, CASCADE COUNTY. Appearing on behalf of the Named Plaintiff and the Class were attorneys Daniel P.

Case 3:06-cv MJR-DGW Document 500 Filed 04/30/15 Page 1 of 15 Page ID #13368

CASE 0:99-md PAM Document 490 Filed 06/27/05 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

State of California Department of Business Oversight

CUSTOMER LIST PURCHASE AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN RICHARD PENNER SELLER. and S&W SEED COMPANY BUYER

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF PHYSICS AND JEFF SCHMIDT

CONSULTING SERVICES AGREEMENT

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Alexandria Division NOTICE OF MOTION

BEFORE THE FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION. Plaintiff, Defendants.

Transcription:

Settlement Agreement Regarding Federal Lawsuit THIS SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT ("Agreement") is made by and between Orion Refining Corporation ("Orion"), the Concerned Citizens of New Sarpy ("CCNS") and Dorothy Jenkins, is effective as to the date set forth below, and sets forth the mutually agreed to terms and conditions of the full settlement, compromise, and release of the claims by and between the parties in the U.S. District Court lawsuit captioned Concerned Citizens of New Sarpy v. Orion Refining Corporation, No. 01-3704 (E.D. La). Recitals WHEREAS, Orion maintains it is a Delaware Corporation authorized to do and doing business in the State of Louisiana; Orion operates a refinery referred to as the Orion Refinery located in New Sarpy, Louisiana; WHEREAS, CCNS maintains it is an unincorporated association of individuals residing near the Orion Refinery; WHEREAS, Dorothy Jenkins is a resident of St. Charles Street in the St. Charles Terrace neighborhood of New Sarpy, Louisiana, adjacent to the Orion Refinery; WHEREAS, the St. Charles Terrace Neighborhood Association ("SCTNA") is a duly incorporated neighborhood association which maintains it is made up of residents of the St. Charles Terrace neighborhood of New Sarpy, Louisiana, adjacent to the Orion Refinery, principally made up of St. Charles Street, Terrace Street, Annex Street and Clement Street fronting on River Road; this Agreement is intended to benefit SCTNA in addition to the parties to the Agreement; WHEREAS, CCNS has filed a lawsuit entitled "Concerned Citizens of New Sarpy vs. Orion Refining Corporation," Civil Action No. 01-3704, Section D, Mag. No. 5, in U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana, which matter has been pending since December, 2001 ("Federal Lawsuit"). CCNS filed the Federal Lawsuit as a citizens' suit under the Federal Clean Air Act, alleging that Orion violated the Clean Air Act and implementing regulations; WHEREAS, CCNS and Dorothy Jenkins filed a lawsuit entitled "Concerned Citizens of New Sarpy and Dorothy Jenkins vs. Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality" 19th Judicial District Court No. 492276, for the Parish of Baton Rouge, State of Louisiana, which matter has been pending since February, 2002 ("State Lawsuit"). The State lawsuit was filed against the Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality ("LDEQ"), challenging LDEQ's issuance to Orion on January 10, 2002, of a Clean Air Act Title V Air Operating Permit ("Permit"). Orion intervened in the State Lawsuit to protect its interests with respect to the Permit. By separate agreement, the parties have agreed to resolve the State Settlement Agreement Regarding Federal Lawsuit Page 1 of 12

Lawsuit whereby CCNS and Dorothy Jenkins will move to dismiss the State Lawsuit with prejudice; WHEREAS, on September 5, 2002, Orion and the LDEQ agreed preliminarily to a settlement agreement (the "Preliminary LDEQ Settlement Agreement") which addressed enforcement and compliance issues between Orion and LDEQ, and by which Orion has agreed to implement changes at the Orion Refinery, including installation of new pollution control technologies and to accomplish Beneficial Environmental Projects; WHEREAS, among the Beneficial Environmental Projects that Orion agreed to fund in the Preliminary LDEQ Settlement Agreement is a commitment to adopt and support community-wide programs, to be approved by LDEQ, in the amount of one million dollars ($1,000,000.00) over four years from the effective date of the Orion's Settlement Agreement with LDEQ; WHEREAS, the Preliminary LDEQ Agreement is awaiting LDEQ's consideration of public comment and final signatures by the State of Louisiana and Orion before it becomes effective; Orion's Settlement Agreement with LDEQ, in the form it first becomes effective is referred to here as the "Final LDEQ Settlement Agreement"; WHEREAS, CCNS filed one or more sets of comments to the LDEQ objecting to the Preliminary LDEQ Agreement or portions thereof; WHEREAS, to avoid the time and expense of litigation and to foster a cooperative spirit between them, and without Orion's acknowledging or admitting any fault or responsibility with respect to the Federal Lawsuit, the State Lawsuit, or the Preliminary or Final LDEQ Agreement, Orion, CCNS and Dorothy Jenkins now enter into this Agreement, and by doing so intend subject to the terms of this Agreement to resolve, terminate and settle, fully, completely and finally, all claims raised in the Federal Lawsuit that Orion violated the Clean Air Act and implementing regulations although CCNS reserves its right to petition the Court for an award of litigation costs including expert consultant fees within 30 days after entry of the Court s Order of dismissal of the Federal Lawsuit. NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises, obligations, covenants, warranties and representations set forth below, Orion, CCNS, and Dorothy Jenkins agree as follows: I. Obligations and Commitments of Orion 1. LDEQ Agreement. Agreement. a. Orion shall comply in full with the Final LDEQ Settlement Settlement Agreement Regarding Federal Lawsuit Page 2 of 12

b. Orion's agreement, set forth directly above, to comply with the Final LDEQ Settlement Agreement may be enforced by SCTNA, CCNS, and/or Dorothy Jenkins (referred to below individually or collectively as "the Enforcer") as an obligation of this Agreement. In any such enforcement, reasonable litigation costs and attorney fees shall be available to the same extent they would be available in an action under 42 U.S.C. 7604(d). Before commencing such enforcement, however, the Enforcer shall provide Orion notice and at least a 60-day period for cooperative resolution of the dispute. c. In any enforcement pursuant to this Agreement of Orion's agreement to comply with the Final LDEQ Settlement Agreement, if Orion's performance has occurred, the Enforcer shall have the burden to show that acceptance of such performance by LDEQ was or would be arbitrary and capricious or an abuse of discretion. d. In any enforcement pursuant to this Agreement of Orion's agreement to comply with the Final LDEQ Settlement Agreement: If Orion and LDEQ have amended or modified the Final LDEQ Settlement Agreement after reasonable notice to at least SCTNA, CCNS, and Dorothy Jenkins and a reasonable opportunity for comment on all but trivial changes by at least SCTNA, CCNS, and Dorothy Jenkins, then Orion's obligation under this Agreement shall be to comply with the Final LDEQ Settlement Agreement as amended or modified unless the Enforcer shows that the amendment or modification was arbitrary and capricious or an abuse of discretion by LDEQ. For purposes of this Agreement a reasonable opportunity to comment shall be defined as a 30-day period, unless Louisiana law or regulation requires a longer period. e. Orion agrees to promptly notify SCTNA, CCNS, and Dorothy Jenkins of any modifications or amendments to Orion's Settlement Agreement with LDEQ and provide them with a copy of such modifications or amendments. Orion agrees not to oppose any reasonable request by SCTNA, CCNS, and Dorothy Jenkins for a public hearing or meeting about such a modification or amendment. Orion agrees to meet with SCTNA, as may be requested on a reasonable frequency, to apprise the community of significant progress made or significant issues which may have arisen with respect to Orion s Settlement Agreement with LDEQ. f. Orion agrees to establish a repository in the St. Charles Parish Library or other location to be agreed upon between Orion and SCTNA, CCNS, and Dorothy Jenkins, to receive copies of quarterly reports, copies of any certifications of Continuous Emission Monitors and copies of any termination certifications (such as the certification of compliance and completion contemplated by Section XVII.D. of the Preliminary LDEQ Settlement Agreement) required to be filed by the Final LDEQ Settlement Agreement, as that agreement may be modified or amended. Orion shall furnish such copies within five (5) business days of the date same are provided to LDEQ and shall be maintained for a minimum of three (3) Settlement Agreement Regarding Federal Lawsuit Page 3 of 12

years. When copies of documents are added to the repository, Orion shall contemporaneously provide notice to CCNS. 2. Beneficial Environmental Project: a) Orion understands that certain individuals who identified themselves as officers and members of CCNS have joined or have indicated their interest in joining SCTNA, and further that certain of these individuals have been named to the Board of Directors of SCTNA. Orion commits to consult with SCTNA with respect to identifying projects and funding levels for projects to be funded as Beneficial Environmental Projects pursuant to the Final LDEQ Settlement Agreement. Orion agrees to consult with SCTNA prior to making any proposals to LDEQ in satisfaction of the provisions of the Final LDEQ Settlement Agreement regarding Beneficial Environment Projects. b) Orion agrees that one of the Beneficial Environmental Projects to be instituted by Orion pursuant to the Final LDEQ Settlement Agreement, as it may be amended or modified, shall include the installation, operation, and maintenance of at least one monitoring station located between the Refinery's perimeter and the New Sarpy residential community that includes at least one continuous monitoring device for S02. II. Obligations of CCNS and Dorothy Jenkins 1. Dismissal of Lawsuit: Orion and CCNS agree that they shall within five (5) working days of the execution of the Final LDEQ Agreement -- provided that such agreement, taken as a whole, is not substantially less stringent than the Preliminary LDEQ Agreement file (1) a Joint Motion and (2) a Proposed Order with the Federal Court in the form of Exhibits A and B, respectively, to this Agreement. Further, within five (5) working days of the effective date of this Agreement, CCNS and Orion shall jointly file a Joint Motion to Stay with the Federal Court in the form of Exhibit C. 2. Comments to LDEQ Settlement Agreement: Within five (5) working days of the effective date of this Agreement, CCNS and Dorothy Jenkins will notify LDEQ that any and all comments or objections filed by or on their behalf with LDEQ with respect to the Preliminary LDEQ Settlement Agreement are withdrawn. Confirmation of this communication to LDEQ shall be presented to Orion within three (3) working days thereof. 3. Land Shark Signs: CCNS and Dorothy Jenkins will recommend the removal of any signs posted identifying or depicting Orion or any of its officers as "land sharks." Settlement Agreement Regarding Federal Lawsuit Page 4 of 12

III. Additional Provisions 1. Scope: This Settlement Agreement is binding on Orion, its successors, assigns and transferees. If Orion sells or otherwise transfers the refinery, Orion warrants that all successors, assigns and transferees shall be bound and comply. 2. Notice: a. Any notice to CCNS required under this Agreement shall, at minimum, be provided to the individual and at the address listed below unless and until CCNS provides written notice of a reasonable alternative name and/or address for the provision of notice, in which case such notice shall be provided to such reasonable alternative name and/or address: Don Winston P. O. Box 425 New Sarpy, Louisiana 70078 b. Any notice to Orion required under this Agreement shall, at minimum, be provided to the individual and at the address listed below unless and until CCNS provides written notice of a reasonable alternative name and/or address for the provision of notice, in which case such notice shall be provided to such reasonable alternative name and/or address: Eric Bluth Orion Refining Corporation P.O. Box 537 Norco, Louisiana 70079 3. Effective Date: This agreement shall be effective upon its execution by the parties. 4. Complete Agreement: This Settlement Agreement is intended by Orion, CCNS and Dorothy Jenkins to be a final and complete expression of their agreement and understanding with respect to the subject matter of the Settlement Agreement. Any and all previous agreements and understandings between or among the parties regarding settlement of the Federal Lawsuit whether written or oral, including specifically, the Agreement between Orion and Concerned Citizens of New Sarpy and Dorothy Jenkins, dated December 9, 2002, are superseded and rendered null and void by this Agreement. The terms of this Agreement cannot be altered, changed or modified except in writing executed by each of the parties, and no provisions can be waived unless expressed in writing and signed by each of the parties. Settlement Agreement Regarding Federal Lawsuit Page 5 of 12

5. Multiple Originals: The parties may execute this Agreement in multiple originals and/or counterparts. If so executed, this Agreement shall be valid and binding as if all parties executed the same original. 6. Enforcement: If any of the provision of the Agreement is found to be unenforceable, that finding shall not effect the enforceability of any other provision hereof. IN WITNESS THEREOF, Orion, CCNS, by and through its designated president, Dorothy Jenkins, and Dorothy Jenkins in her individual capacity, have each executed this Agreement individually or through their duly authorized undersigned representatives as of the dates set forth below. ORION REFINING CORPORATION By: Title: Date: CONCERNED CITIZENS OF NEW SARPY By its President, Dorothy Jenkins DOROTHY JENKINS Date: DOROTHY JENKINS Date: Settlement Agreement Regarding Federal Lawsuit Page 6 of 12

Approved as to form: On behalf of Orion Refining Corp. MICHAEL A. CHERNEKOFF Bar No. 1295 STANLEYA. MILLAN Bar No. 9658 TARA G. RICHARD Bar No. 26356 Jones, Walker, Waechter, Poitevent, Carrère & Denègre, L. L. P. 201 St. Charles Avenue New Orleans, Louisiana 70170 (504) 582-8000 Date: Approved as to form: On behalf of Concerned Citizens of New Sarpy and Dorothy Jenkins: Date: ADAM BABICH, Bar No. 27177 KARLA RAETTIG, Bar No. JOHN SUTTLES, Bar No. Tulane Environmental Law Clinic 6329 Freret Street New Orleans, Louisiana 70118-6231 Settlement Agreement Regarding Federal Lawsuit Page 7 of 12

EXHIBIT A UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA CONCERNED CITIZENS ) OF NEW SARPY ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) File Number: 2:01CV3704 v. ) Section: D ) Judge McNamara ORION REFINING ) Magistrate Judge Chasez CORPORATION ) ) Defendant. ) ) JOINT MOTION FOR DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO SETTLEMENT Pursuant to a Settlement Agreement by and between Orion Refining Corporation ("Orion"), the Concerned Citizens of New Sarpy ("CCNS") and Dorothy Jenkins, Orion and CCNS move jointly for dismissal of this action with prejudice provided that this Court retains jurisdiction over this matter to enforce the terms of the Settlement Agreement and CCNS retains the right to petition the Court for an award of costs. As grounds for their Motion, the parties state: 1. The parties have agreed to and executed a Settlement Agreement embodying a cooperative resolution of this matter. The parties do not contemplate filing a copy of the Settlement Agreement in the record of this action unless (1) the Court requests that a copy be filed, or (2) one of the parties moves to enforce the terms of the Settlement Agreement. If it is necessary to file a copy of the Settlement Agreement in the record of this action, the parties request leave to file such Settlement Agreement under seal. 2. The Parties agree that the possibility of further disputes will be minimized if this Court retains jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the Settlement Agreement Regarding Federal Lawsuit Page 8 of 12

Settlement Agreement. Further, CCNS reserves its right to petition the Court for an award of litigation costs including but not limited to expert consultant fees (but not including attorney fees) within 30 days after entry of the Court s Order of dismissal. Wherefore: This Court should dismiss this action with prejudice, subject to CCNS s right to petition the Court for an award of litigation costs including but not limited to expert consultant fees (but not including attorney fees) within 30 days after entry of the Court s Order of dismissal. Also, this Court should retain jurisdiction for the limited purpose of enforcing the Parties Settlement Agreement. Respectfully submitted on December, 2002. ADAM BABICH, SBN 27177 KARLA A. RAETTIG, SBN 27860 Counsel for Concerned Citizens of New Sarpy Tulane Environmental Law Clinic 6329 Freret Street New Orleans, LA 70118 (504) 865_5789; FAX: (504) 862_8721 Attorneys for Plaintiff Concerned Citizens of New Sarpy MICHAEL A. CHERNEKOFF, SBN 1295 STANLEY A. MILLAN, SBN 9856 TARA R. KEBODEAUX, SBN 26356 Jones, Walker, Waechter, Poitevent, Carrère, & Denègre, L.L.P. 201 St. Charles Avenue New Orleans, Louisiana 70170_5100 (504) 582_8000 Attorneys for Defendant Orion Refining Corporation Settlement Agreement Regarding Federal Lawsuit Page 9 of 12

EXHIBIT B UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA CONCERNED CITIZENS ) OF NEW SARPY ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) File Number: 2:01CV3704 v. ) Section: D ) Judge McNamara ORION REFINING ) Magistrate Judge Chasez CORPORATION ) ) Defendant. ) ) [Proposed] ORDER OF DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO SETTLEMENT Having considered the joint motion of the Parties and being fully advised, the Court hereby grants the Parties joint motion. Accordingly: This matter is hereby dismissed with prejudice except that this Court retains jurisdiction over this matter to enforce the terms of the Settlement Agreement. Further, CCNS may petition the Court for an award of litigation costs including but not limited to expert consultant fees (but not including attorney fees) within 30 days after entry of this Order. If any of the Parties moves to enforce the terms of the Settlement Agreement or if it is otherwise necessary to file a copy of the Settlement Agreement, the parties are granted leave to file a copy of such Settlement Agreement under seal. Judgment shall enter on this matter consistent with the terms of this Order. Dated: Judge A. J. McNamara, United States District Court, Eastern District, La. Settlement Agreement Regarding Federal Lawsuit Page 10 of 12

EXHIBIT C UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA CONCERNED CITIZENS ) OF NEW SARPY ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) File Number: 2:01CV3704 v. ) Section: D ) Judge McNamara ORION REFINING ) Magistrate Judge Chasez CORPORATION ) ) Defendant. ) ) JOINT MOTION FOR STAY PURSUANT TO SETTLEMENT Pursuant to a Settlement Agreement by and between Orion Refining Corporation ("Orion"), the Concerned Citizens of New Sarpy ("CCNS") and Dorothy Jenkins, Orion and CCNS move for a stay of this lawsuit pending settlement. As grounds for their Joint Motion, the Parties state: 1. The parties contemplate moving jointly for dismissal of this action pursuant to a settlement agreement after Orion and the Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality ( LDEQ ) finalize a settlement agreement (the LDEQ Settlement Agreement ) consistent with an existing preliminary agreement between Orion and LDEQ. 2. The parties expect the LDEQ Settlement Agreement to be final soon. If, however, the LDEQ Settlement Agreement is not final within 180- Settlement Agreement Regarding Federal Lawsuit Page 11 of 12

days, CCNS reserves the right after an additional 60-day period for consultation with Orion to Move to lift the stay of this lawsuit. Wherefore: This Court should stay this action pending a joint motion to dismiss pursuant to a settlement agreement, reserving to CCNS the right to move after a 60- day period for consultation with Orion to lift the stay if the LDEQ Settlement is not final within 180 days. Respectfully submitted on December, 2002. ADAM BABICH, SBN 27177 KARLA A. RAETTIG, SBN 27860 Counsel for Concerned Citizens of New Sarpy Tulane Environmental Law Clinic 6329 Freret Street New Orleans, LA 70118 (504) 865_5789; FAX: (504) 862_8721 Attorneys for Plaintiff Concerned Citizens of New Sarpy MICHAEL A. CHERNEKOFF, SBN 1295 STANLEY A. MILLAN, SBN 9856 TARA R. KEBODEAUX, SBN 26356 Jones, Walker, Waechter, Poitevent, Carrère, & Denègre, L.L.P. 201 St. Charles Avenue New Orleans, Louisiana 70170_5100 (504) 582_8000 Attorneys for Defendant Orion Refining Corporation Settlement Agreement Regarding Federal Lawsuit Page 12 of 12