Electronic Commerce & State Insurance Regulation. John Bauer Associate Counsel NAIC (www.naic.org) jbauer@naic.org



Similar documents
Approved Committees for 2007 Functions, Responsibilities, and Qualifications

NEW FEDERAL LAW TAKES EFFECT THAT GIVES LEGAL VALIDITY

POLICY ISSUES IN E-COMMERCE APPLICATIONS: ELECTRONIC RECORD AND SIGNATURE COMPLIANCE. 15 USC 7001 et. seq. (E-SIGN) and

City of Minneapolis Policy for Enterprise Information Management

DocuSign Presentation CUNA Lending Council. Greg E. Cook Georgia s Own Credit Union Atlanta, GA November 2013

JUNE 28, Connecticut Avenue, NW, Suite 1000 Washington, DC Phone: 202/ Fax: 202/

US Solvency Modernization and Regulatory Process. Joe Fritsch, Director of Insurance Accounting Policy New York Insurance Department, U.S.A.

HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES STAFF ANALYSIS SUMMARY ANALYSIS

Published on e-li ( July 03, 2016 Electronic Signatures and Transactions. Dear Reader:

NAIC. National Association of Insurance Commissioners. Not for Reprint ELECTRONIC COMMERCE & REGULATION ISSUE PAPER

Recent Developments in E-Commerce Law

White Paper. The E-Sign Act. Use and enforceability of identifiers, passwords and personal identification numbers as signatures

Question Presented. Staff Recommendation

HIPAA and Beyond: The Evolving Landscape of Health Privacy

Market Analysis Report

E-DELIVERY AND LIFE INSURANCE. Deborah Alexander and Margo Tank

Recordable Recording Laws and Regulations in Michigan

HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES FINAL BILL ANALYSIS SUMMARY ANALYSIS

Modernizing the Insurance Regulatory Structure: The NAIC Framework for a National System of State-Based Regulation

WACHA Going Paperless

Independent Insurance Agents & Brokers of Louisiana 9818 Bluebonnet Boulevard Baton Rouge, Louisiana

STATE INSURANCE REGULATION

TECK RESOURCES LIMITED AUDIT COMMITTEE CHARTER

INTERNATIONAL PAPER COMPANY

Moving Towards an Electronic Real Estate Transaction

Digital Signatures The Silver Bullet for E-Signature Laws

Issues to Address: The Privacy Concerns of Individuals

USE OF DIGITAL SIGNATURES IN COMMUNICATIONS WITH PUBLIC ENTITIES IN CALIFORNIA

A 6-POINT FRAMEWORK BUSINESS TECHNOLOGY GROUP

Electronic Signature of Retirement Plan Documents

Title V Preventing Fraud and Abuse. Subtitle A- Establishment of New Health and Human Services and Department of Justice Health Care Fraud Positions

A Shopper s Guide to CANCER INSURANCE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

esignature Requirements Gathering Silanis Technology Inc., 2006 Silanis grants to BFMA the right to use and distribute this material.

Compliance Management Systems (CMS) Division of Depositor and Consumer Protection

E-SIGNATURES FY Movement Mortgage, LLC s e-signature Policy & Procedures Manual. This policy was last revised December 4, 2014.

erecording Best Practices for Recorders

ACLI LAW & COMPLIANCE BOSTON 2009 MARKET CONDUCT REFORM

NATIONAL INSURANCE BROKERS ASSOCIATION OF AUSTRALIA (NIBA) Submission to WorkCover Western Australia. Legislative Review 2013

Cyber Security Recommendations October 29, 2002

State of Rhode Island and Providence Plantations DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS REGULATION Division of Insurance 1511 Pontiac Avenue Cranston, RI 02920

The case for adoption of the UN Electronic Communications Convention

Electronic And Digital Signatures

California Surplus Lines Warning Statement

E-Signature Adoption Trends

Introduction. A Brief Note Regarding Allocation to Insurance Specialist III. Dictionary of Insurance Terms

Social Marketing & Liability

State of Arkansas Policy Statement on the Use of Electronic Signatures by State Agencies June 2008

I. Need for Federal Privacy Legislation

RESOLUTION FAVORING CONTINUED STATE-BASED INSURANCE CONSUMER PROTECTION

ELECTRONIC SIGNATURES IN GLOBAL AND NATIONAL COMMERCE ACT

PART I ARTICLE. apply to all insurers domiciled in this State unless exempt. (b) The purposes of this article shall be to:

REFERENCE ACTION ANALYST STAFF DIRECTOR or BUDGET/POLICY CHIEF. 1) Insurance & Banking Subcommittee 13 Y, 0 N, As CS Cooper Cooper

SRI LANKA AUDITING PRACTICE STATEMENT 1013 ELECTRONIC COMMERCE EFFECT ON THE AUDIT OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

INTERNATIONAL AUDITING PRACTICE STATEMENT 1013 ELECTRONIC COMMERCE EFFECT ON THE AUDIT OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Tennessee Department of Commerce & Insurance

GAO LIFE INSURANCE SETTLEMENTS. Regulatory Inconsistencies May Pose a Number of Challenges. Report to the Special Committee on Aging, U.S.

What is Online Dispute Resolution? Why use Online Dispute Resolution? What are the different types of Online Dispute Resolution?

retained in a form that accurately reflects the information in the contract or other record,

2013 Statewide Legislative Agenda For Arizona Business

November 8, The Honorable Alan Greenspan Chairman Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System

The Procter & Gamble Company Board of Directors Audit Committee Charter

Digital Signatures The Law and Best Practices for Compliance. January 2014

PRACTICE NOTE 1013 ELECTRONIC COMMERCE - EFFECT ON THE AUDIT OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DRAFT. By: Daniel Silien and Christopher R. Yukins Co-Chairs

MINNESOTA MUTUAL COMPANIES, INC. Guidelines of the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors

13 LC ER. Senate Bill 202 By: Senators Unterman of the 45th, Mullis of the 53rd and Chance of the 16th A BILL TO BE ENTITLED AN ACT

ELECTRONIC RECORD AND SIGNATURE COMPLIANCE. NASD Rules 3010(d) and 3110(c)(1)(C) SEC Rule 17a-4 15 USC 7001 et. seq. (E-SIGN)

LEGAL UPDATE October 14, 2008 Ashley Strauss-Martin, RANM Legal Hotline and Forms Attorney

Application for Placement on Approved Captive Insurer Management Firm List

Use of Check Images By Customers of Financial Institutions. Version Dated: July 14, 2006

Brian Hengesbaugh Partner

Guylyn Cummins, Esq. Elizabeth Balfour, Esq.

II. Compliance Examinations - Compliance Management System. Compliance Management System. Introduction. Board of Directors and Management Oversight

1/30/2013. Agenda. Electronic Signatures/ Informed Consent

COMPLIANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM

DRAFT. Electronic Banking: New Developments and Regulatory Risks

Medical Providers Mutual Insurance Company, A Risk Retention Group

Standards for the Professional Practice of Internal Auditing

Life Actuarial (A) Task Force/ Health Actuarial (B) Task Force Amendment Proposal Form*

Title 36: TAXATION. Chapter 921: UNIFORM SALES AND USE TAX ADMINISTRATION ACT HEADING: PL 2001, c. 496, 1 (new)

Joe Huddleston, LL.D. Executive Director North Eastern States Tax Officials Association Conference

Security & Privacy Friends, Foes or Partners?

Compliance: Records Management and the Law

IIPRC-A-05-I. INDIVIDUAL IMMEDIATE NON-VARIABLE ANNUITY CONTRACT STANDARDS (Including contracts used to fund structured settlement agreements)

SUMMARY: The Defense Health Agency proposes to alter an. existing system of records, EDTMA 02, entitled "Medical/Dental

H. R SEC DIRECTORATE FOR INFORMATION ANALYSIS AND INFRA STRUCTURE PROTECTION.

Management Alta s team of professionals set us apart. Our associates are CPAs, attorneys, business, and insurance professionals with the most

A. Introduction B. Background

Deciphering the Legal Framework that Governs Online Identity Systems

Model Regulation Service 3 rd Quarter 2015 Index and Model Description

SALESFORCE.COM, INC. CHARTER OF THE AUDIT AND FINANCE COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS. (Revised September 11, 2012)

How to Assess Legal Risk Management Practices

2015 Legislative Session Highlights. Jesse Laslovich, Chief Legal Counsel Nick Mazanec, Attorney

Cybersecurity and Data Breach: Mitigating Risk and How Government Policymakers Approach These Critical Issues

THE STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA BUSINESS LAW NEWS BUSINESS LAW SECTION AN OVERVIEW WITH ATTENTION TO CURRENT ISSUES

The United States has high levels of Internet use, but access to fast broadband remains patchy.

Statement of the American Council of Life Insurers. before the

Electronic Signature: Increasing the Speed and Efficiency of Commercial Transactions

PENNSYLVANIA STATUTES TITLE 73. TRADE AND COMMERCE CHAPTER 41. REGULATORY ELECTRONIC TRANSACTIONS CHAPTER 1. PRELIMINARY PROVISIONS

Transcription:

Electronic Commerce & State Insurance Regulation John Bauer Associate Counsel NAIC (www.naic.org) jbauer@naic.org

What is the NAIC? Voluntary organization of the chief state insurance regulatory officials Formed in 1871 55 members Three offices: Exec., DC and SVO Approximately 380 employees

What are the NAIC s Objectives? Promotion of the public interest through the regulation of insurance and the fair, just, and equitable treatment of consumers; Reliability of the insurance institution as to solvency, financial solidity, and guaranty against loss; and Maintenance and improvement of state regulation of insurance.

What Does the NAIC Do? Forum to discuss common interests; Facilitates members working cooperatively on regulatory matters that transcend jurisdictional boundaries; Monitors and supports Committee, Subcommittee and Task Force activity;

What Does the NAIC Do? Tracks non-u.s. insurers wanting to do business in this country; Collects and maintains financial information from insurers to assist state regulators in their efforts to monitor solvency; Provides support for state litigation in the form of Amicus Curiae briefs;

What Does the NAIC Do? Values securities held by insurers; Monitors federal activity that affects insurance regulation; Supports insurance department consumer activities by producing a number of consumer guides;

What Does the NAIC Do? Prepares statistical reports to support insurance regulators activities in financial surveillance, rate regulation, actuarial and market analysis, and related areas; and Provides technical expertise in financial regulation and computer audit techniques to insurance regulators.

A Regulatory Perspective--What Does This Mean? The perspective remains the same in the electronic world as in the traditional paper world of insurance delivery The electronic rules may be different, but regulatory application is the same Goal remains clear: Protection of the Consumer

Electronic Commerce Legislation Uniform Electronic Transactions Act (UETA) Model law for states Adopted by 23 states Electronic Signature in Global and National Commerce Act (E-SIGN/S.761) Federal law effective October 1, 2000/March 1, 2001

State Approaches to Most have some law with general application. Approaches vary: Law applies only to dealings with state Law addresses only electronic signatures; Law applies generally and covers commerce generally; and State adopts UETA.

UETA Legal protection and status to electronic agreements and signatures Party autonomy State autonomy/federal preemption

Resolution UETA & the NAIC their state legislatures that may impede e-commerce in insurance

Federal law passed in June 2000 Applies to interstate and foreign commerce

UETA & E-SIGN--Where are the overlaps? Basic rules concerning electronic legal effect of both Record retention Automated transactions

UETA addresses: differences? Admissibility into evidence Attribution of signature Effects of changes and errors Sending and receiving electronic records

E-SIGN addresses: differences? Specific applications to insurance Preemption and state autonomy Consumer disclosures

& other state laws? If enacted, UETA governs state laws, especially re exclusions standards of consistency and neutrality requirements

Statement of Intent Electronic Commerce & Regulation Working Group Anti-fraud efforts

NAIC Statement of Intent-- Licensing/Reciprocity Agents short-term goal Goal: exceed the requirements of the Gramm-

NAIC Statement of Intent-- Licensing/Reciprocity Companies Uniform Certificate of Authority Application Accelerated License Evaluation Review

NAIC Statement of Intent-- E-Commerce Consumers and industry must be allowed to Work toward implementation of electronic Support for Electronic Commerce &

Electronic Commerce & Marketing of Insurance over the Internet white paper--1997 Appointed by Special Committee on Regulatory Re-engineering in March 1998 Charge of the working group/goals Efficient electronic regulation Develop recommendations for beneficial consumer interaction with insurers

Electronic Commerce & Guidelines Consumer safeguards Harmonization of existing laws to include electronic transactions Regulatory burden no greater than in paper world

Electronic Commerce & Electronic Commerce & Regulation Issues Paper--examined factors that may impede e- commerce in insurance and offered recommendations for regulatory responses

Electronic Commerce & Regulation Working Group Electronic Commerce & Regulation Issues 1. Signatures and Electronic Authentication: Uniformity & security 2. Countersignature/Non-resident Restrictions should be eliminated 3. Document Delivery: Party autonomy

Electronic Commerce & Regulation Working Group Electronic Commerce & Regulation Issues 5. Proof of Coverage: Is paper evidence essential? 6. Electronic Payments: Allow for EFT objectives

Paper Electronic Commerce & Regulation Working Group 8. Disclosures/Disclaimers: Readability 9. Advertising: Retrospective review best? 10. Jurisdiction: Purposeful availment

Regulation Working Group Current activities Protecting the Consumer Subgroup: How can the consumer be sure? Technical Bulletin Drafting Subgroup Planning for e-commerce summit Resolution concerning Uniform Computer Information Transaction Act (UCITA)

What are some roles for state insurance regulation? Monitoring the Web for suspicious activity Building relationships with the private sector and federal authorities Training fraud investigators in online fraud techniques

Questions www.naic.org jbauer@naic.org