NEW PHILADELPHIA CITY SCHOOLS FIVE-YEAR FORECAST 2013-2017



Similar documents
NEW PHILADELPHIA CITY SCHOOLS FIVE-YEAR FORECAST

BUCKEYE VALLEY LOCAL SCHOOLS, DELAWARE COUNTY NOTES/ASSUMPTIONS TO FIVE-YEAR FORECAST FOR APPROVAL MAY 13, 2014

HOW TO READ A FIVE-YEAR FORECAST. Tips and Explanations on Understanding a School District s Forecast

Tipp City Exempted Village Schools. Miami County

Legislative Fiscal Bureau One East Main, Suite 301 Madison, WI (608) Fax: (608)

State Board of Directors for Community Colleges A.R.S

The NEVADA PLAN For School Finance An Overview

LEGISLATIVE SERVICES AGENCY OFFICE OF FISCAL AND MANAGEMENT ANALYSIS 301 State House (317)

EASTLAND FAIRFIELD CAREER & TECHNICAL SCHOOLS FRANKLIN COUNTY SINGLE AUDIT

GENERAL FUND AND PUBLIC SAFETY FUND PROJECTION

School Funding. Where does school funding come from? Where does it actually go?

DEFINITIONS OF IOWA SCHOOL FINANCE TERMS

Long Range Financial Forecasting for School

3/16/2012 SCHOOL FINANCE SCHOOL FINANCE SCHOOL FINANCE

Tax Levies Explained: Julie Joyce-Smith, Real Estate Manager, Butler County Auditor s Office April 8, 2015

Understanding School Choice in Alachua County: Funding School Choice in Florida

SCHOOL FINANCE IN COLORADO

Executive Summary. Model Structure. General Economic Environment and Assumptions

Wayne Local Schools Business Plan Notes ( ) SUBMITTED MAY OF 2012

SCHOOL FINANCE IN COLORADO

VIRGINIA. Description of the Formula

Assembly Bill No. 1 Committee of the Whole THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND ASSEMBLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:

Components 127th General Assembly 128th General Assembly

Local Government Expenditure and Revenue Limits

Informational Issue: School Finance Funding Case Studies

Taken from Guide to Ohio s School District Income Tax 2009 Ohio Dept. of Taxation

Financing Education In Minnesota A Publication of the Minnesota House of Representatives Fiscal Analysis Department

Planning for Our Future 10 YEAR FINANCIAL PLAN REVIEW

LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD. TRS-Care Overview PRESENTED TO THE HOUSE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE SUBCOMMITTEE ON ARTICLE III LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD

MINNESOTA STATE COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES BOARD OF TRUSTEES Agenda Item Summary Sheet

STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA EXECUTIVE SUMMARY OF THE PUBLIC SCHOOL SUPPORT PROGRAM BASED ON THE FINAL COMPUTATIONS FOR THE YEAR

2005 SCHOOL FINANCE LEGISLATION Funding and Distribution

SCHOOL FUNDING COMPLETE RESOURCE

Minnetonka Independent School District 276 Levy Adoption Taxes Payable in 2012

How To Get Rid Of Property Tax In Pennsylvania

Utah State Retirement Systems Overview. September 9, 2009 Prepared by the Office of Legislative Research and General Counsel

CONGRESS OF THE UNITED STATES CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE CBO. The Distribution of Household Income and Federal Taxes, 2008 and 2009

A Primer for New Jersey Budget and Tax Levy Caps

(1) Bases the computations for steps 1, 2 and 5 on net enrollment only, eliminating the adjusted enrollment limits;

Fleming College Financial Plan

TENNESSEE BASIC EDUCATION PROGRAM 2.0

SCHOOL FINANCE IN COLORADO

SCHOOL FINANCE 101. Presented by Brenda Burkett, CPA, SFO Chief Financial Officer Norman Public Schools. February 2015

Detailed information about Ohio s school income tax can be found here:

Description of Budget Cycle

The primary focus of state and local government is to provide basic services,

17,932, ,112,170. Page 4

DATE: March 4, 2016 Raymond J. Orlando, Chief Financial Officer FY 2013 School Based Expenditure Report (SBER) Overview

FUNDING NEW JERSEY PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETIREMENT SYSTEMS

How To Pay For A Home Care Program In Camden

Michigan League for Human Services. Proposal A, School Aid, and the Structural Deficit

FORT MYERS BEACH MOSQUITO CONTROL DISTRICT. September 30, 2014 BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, TOGETHER WITH REPORTS OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

Course Objectives. What are Property Taxes? 2/14/2012. Tax Settlements

STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA PUBLIC SCHOOL SUPPORT PROGRAM EXECUTIVE SUMMARY For the Year

BUDGET. September 10, 2013

Florida Education Finance Program (FEFP)

Colorado Legislative Council Staff FISCAL IMPACT STATEMENT

May 27, 2015 Joint Committee on Finance Paper #561. Additional Positions for Statewide Debt Collection (DOR -- Tax Administration)

Policy Brief June 2010

Projected Statements of Local Assessments. City of Saco, Maine. For the years ending June 30, 2015, 2016 and 2017

School Finance 101. MASA / MASE Spring Conference Joel Sutter Ehlers Greg Crowe - Ehlers

Essential Programs & Services State Calculation for Funding Public Education (ED279):

State Notes TOPICS OF LEGISLATIVE INTEREST Fall 2011

FY 2017 EXECUTIVE SUPPLEMENTAL BUDGET MULTI-YEAR FINANCIAL PLAN

SUPPORTING DATA FOR FISCAL YEAR 2014 ILLINOIS COMMUNITY COLLEGE SYSTEM, ADULT EDUCATION, AND POSTSECONDARY CAREER AND TECHNICAL EDUCATION

LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL ENTITY EXAMPLE FINANCIAL CONDITION ASSESSMENT INDICATORS AND RELATED PROCEDURES

April 17, 2015 Joint Committee on Finance Paper #701. Veterans Trust Fund Condition and Other Related Items (Veterans Affairs)

Transcription:

Real Estate Tax Assumptions NEW PHILADELPHIA CITY SCHOOLS FIVE-YEAR FORECAST 2013-2017 REVENUE ASSUMPTIONS Real estate taxes had increased at approximately 1.1% to 2.0% through 2012 and a 1.5% increase was normally built into the five year forecast Actual 2012 collections were about $50,000 under the 2011 revenue. This is the first time that tax revenue has dropped in the District. The August 2012 collection was $150,000 above the 2011 collection. The 2013 estimate has been adjusted accordingly and modest increases have been shown in 2014 through 2016. 2010 real estate and public utility valuation $413,097,780 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Actual Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Base $7,900,000 $7,900,000 $7,950,000 $8,000,000 $8,050,000 Emergency Levy 3,000,000 3,000,000 3,000,000 3,000,000 3,000,000 New Construction 0 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 Collection $10,900,000 $10,950,000 $11,000,000 $11,050,000 $11,100,000 Personal Property Tax Assumptions The personal property tax has been phased out and only a small estimate is made for delinquent taxes that may be collected by the county Auditor. There was hold harmless language in the phase out for the first 7 years. The hold harmless was based on tax collections and rates as of September 2005. The reimbursement of the tax would have come back in different ways including a direct reimbursement and through increases in foundation due to the decrease in property value The old foundation formula allowed for the calculation of the amount of personal property taxes that were offset by an increase in the state foundation due to the property value drop. We received $1,202,000 in direct payments in FY11 after the offset. The phase out included into the governor s budget as approved by the legislature has these payments phased out over a two year period. Approximately one third of the payment will be reduced in FY12 with another third reduced in FY13. The forecast shows a reduction to $781,426 in FY12 and an additional reduction to $336,560 in FY13 through FY16. At the present time, the legislation only covers the two years of the present biennium budget, but legislation could be enacted to reduce the remaining amount in future state budgets.

State Foundation Unrestricted Grants in Aid Last year was the final year of funding under the new Evidence Based Model. This model is being changed back to a per pupil amount for the future. At the present time, there is a Bridge Formula in place to fund districts for the next two years while the per pupil funding model is developed. The State fiscal Stabilization funds received in FY10 and FY11 have been eliminated. The most recent state budget does project an increase in regular funding in FY14 and FY15. Those increases are incorporated into the estimates as well as moderate increases in FY15, forward. None of these increases will be finalized until the final budget bill is passed.. Foundation Unrestricted $7,750,000 $8,272,000 $8,825,000 $9,001,500 $9,181,530 Property Tax Allocation Any growth in this area will be due to the increase in the homestead and rollback growth due to the increase in real estate taxes All Other Revenue This revenue classification fluctuates due to various local grants and revenues received by the District. The major sources of income in this area are investment revenue which will decline over the years as the available cash for investments declines, as well as the decline in the overall interest rates, tuition, fees and service agreements.

EXPENDITURE ASSUMPTIONS Personal Services For forecasting purposes, a percentage increase of 1.00% is used in FY13 and FY14 and no increase in the remaining years has been reflected in the salary estimates. History shows that step increases amount to between 1.75% and 2% of the base each year without any overall increase in the base salary. At the present time we are forecasting the reduction of at least three positions and those numbers are reflected in the 2013 and 2014 estimates. Due to the fact that we had to adjust the pay dates to be in compliance with the negotiated agreement, 27 paydays actually occur during the 2013 FY which inflates the salary figure for that year. Base $14,650,000 $14,650,000 $14,948,575 $15,180,278 $15,415,572 Step 0 227,075 231,703 235,294 238,941 27th pay 485,000 0 0 0 0 Increase(Decrease) 0 146,500 0 0 0 3 Teacher reduction 0-75,000 0 0 0 $15,135,000 $14,948,575 $15,180,278 $15,415,572 $15,654,514 Employees Retirement and Benefits Retirement, and Medicare, will increase at the same percentages that the salary increases. Insurance increases have been estimated at 1.3% in FY13 and 5% for the remaining years of the forecast based upon prior year experiences. We have also included a phase in of additional contributions by staff to 10% in FY12 forward, which is an increase of 5% per year. The insurance numbers for FY13 have been adjusted to reflect current costs and future projections are based on the FY13 base figure. This is our fourth year in the Portage County Consortium. It was our hope that by joining the group, any increase we might experience due to the Districts individual performance would be offset by the performance of the over all group. This held true after the first two years and we saw a minor decrease in costs. The increase in insurance costs for the FY 12 year was 16%. However, had we not been a member of the consortium, the increase would have been in the 30% to 35% range. The increase this past year was 1.3%. We will continue to monitor the overall performance to make sure that it is meeting the projections and protection needed by the District. Workers compensation is increasing due to the changes being made by the Ohio Bureau of Workers Compensation. We are still enrolled in a group rating plan, but the group rating percentages have been lowered by the bureau which has lead to increases in our workers compensation costs.

The increases in the other categories are based on the estimated increases in salary costs. Tuition and clothing allowances are negotiated amounts and do not fluctuate. Retirement $2,200,000 $2,288,000 $2,379,520 $2,474,701 $2,573,689 Health Insurance 3,550,000 3,727,500 3,913,875 4,109,569 4,315,047 Payment from reserves -260,000-260,000 0 0 0 Employee Share -355,000-372,750-391,388-410,957-431,505 Life Insurance 25,500 26,000 26,500 27,000 27,500 Medicare 192,000 197,760 203,693 209,804 216,098 Clothing Allowance 9,000 9,000 9,000 9,000 9,000 Worker s Comp. & Unemp. 105,000 105,000 105,000 105,000 105,000 Tuition 60,000 60,000 60,000 6,000 60,000 $5,526,500 $5,780,510 $6,306,200 $6,530,116 $6,874,829 Purchased Services, Supplies and Other Other increases are based on historical trends. Fiscal year 2013 figures for purchased services, supplies, and capital outlay have been adjusted by the carryover encumbrances of $35,309. Operating Transfers Future year transfers are based on the Board s cost of supplementing the Summer School Program. Encumbrances are budgeted to be expended in the year they occur and are therefore shown at zero for the current and forecasted years.

GENERAL ASSUMPTIONS Estimates assume steady enrollment beginning fiscal year 2013 and moderate valuation growth beginning in FY 2014. The foundation estimates are the best estimate at this point in time based upon the current budget bill. Due to the uncertaianty of the State of Ohio budget, accurately estimating the 2014, 2015, 2016 and 2017 state revenues to the district is almost impossible. As more information is released by the Department of Education, updated projections will be put into the forecast. The decrease in revenue of over $1,000,000 per year beginning in FY 2012 is due to the decrease in funding from the state. It will be necessary for the district to look at increasing revenues by passing additional tax levies, or reducing costs. The overall projected loss in revenue to the district due to state cuts over the entire forecast is in excess of $8,000,000. We have added to the forecast in FY13 revenues from a new tax levy. (Line 13.020) However due to the unpredictability of a levy being passed at a particular time, these numbers are only projections. The 5.90 mill operating levy will need to be placed on the ballot for renewal in November 2013 It should be noted that this forecast was prepared using the most current information available and will fluctuate as new data is available.