Informational Webinar for MDE Literacy Support Schools. Agenda



Similar documents
Special Education Leadership Institute

MDE Literacy Positions Available

To expand teachers use of a variety of resources to improve instruction

James Rumsey Technical Institute Employee Performance and Effectiveness Evaluation Procedure

INITIAL PROGRAM APPROVAL TRAINING 2015 TRANSCRIPT

Teacher Performance Evaluation System

C Reading Sufficiency Act - Programs of Reading Instruction

Optional Teacher Professional Development Plan (PDP) Template and Sample PDP

FRAMEWORK OF SUPPORT: SCHOOL-LEVEL PRACTICE PROFILE

SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT GRANT (SIG) PRACTICE:

THE SCHOOL BOARD OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA TEACHER PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL SYSTEM, TABLE OF CONTENTS

3.1.a: Curricular Practices

Data Walls/Data Rooms

Essential Principles of Effective Evaluation

Springfield Public Schools English Language Learner Recommended Actions and Implementation Plans

Stronge Teacher Effectiveness Performance Evaluation System

Hamilton Southeastern Schools

Hiawatha Academies School District #4170

Effective Early Literacy Support in Philadelphia Promoting Early Literacy Inside and Outside of the Classroom

Executive Summary. McWillie Elementary School

CII - Promising Practices

Basic Skills Teachers Intervention Specialists & Instructional Assistants Support Services Handbook Audubon Public Schools

Rubric for Evaluating North Carolina s Instructional Technology Facilitators

Hawaii Teacher Standards Board Teacher Leader Work Group Report

Holland Elementary School Local Stakeholder Group Recommendations to the Commissioner Submitted January 6, 2014

Position Statement on English Language Arts Education Connecticut State Board of Education December 3, 2008

MARZANO SCHOOL LEADERSHIP EVALUATION MODEL

REGULATIONS of the BOARD OF REGENTS FOR ELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY EDUCATION

Comprehensive Reading Plan K-12 A Supplement to the North Carolina Literacy Plan. North Carolina Department of Public Instruction

2014/2015 ACADEMIC IMPROVEMENT PLAN TEMPLATE. 1) List report card areas where your school received D or F grades.

Mississippi Counselor Appraisal Rubric M-CAR

District 2854 Ada-Borup Public Schools. Reading Well By Third Grade Plan. For. Ada-Borup Public Schools. Drafted April 2012

Georgia Department of Education School Keys: Unlocking Excellence through the Georgia School Standards

Response to Intervention: The Mississippi Experience

Please read this carefully prior to submitting your application.

Chapter 6: Hiring and placing coaches

Revisioning Graduate Teacher Education in North Carolina Master of Arts in Elementary Education Appalachian State University

Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and Support Systems

MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT FOR SCHOOL-BASED READING COACHES

1 REVISOR C. show verification of completing a Board of Teaching preparation program

ARIZONA State Personnel Development Grant Introduction and Need

ENROLLED SENATE BILL No. 103

School Performance Plan

RtI Response to Intervention

Key Principles for ELL Instruction (v6)

TEACHER PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL

Wappingers Central School District

Technical Assistance Paper

HIGHLY QUALIFIED TEACHERS (M)

LAKE SILVER ELEMENTARY

Performance Goal 1: All students will reach high standards, at a minimum, attaining proficiency or better in reading and mathematics by

MS Communication Arts Goals Building and District Update 2/26/2009

BUILDING CURRICULUM ACCOMMODATION PLAN

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2011 SENATE DRS65072-TC-26 (01/31) Short Title: Excellent Public Schools Act. (Public)

GEORGIA STANDARDS FOR THE APPROVAL OF PROFESSIONAL EDUCATION UNITS AND EDUCATOR PREPARATION PROGRAMS

Teacher Performance Evaluation System TPES

K-12 Comprehensive Research Based Reading Plans District: Dade

Description of Florida s Support for Turnaround Efforts

2013 Marzano School Leader Evaluation Model Rubric

NC TEACHER EVALUATION PROCESS SAMPLE EVIDENCES AND ARTIFACTS

Curriculum Management

What exactly are the new roles of the School Psychologist and Social Worker?

National University. Revised January 2014 Page 1

Academy for Teaching and Learning Leadership. School Evaluation. Andrew Academy

MURRAY STATE UNIVERSITY

Uinta County School District #1 Multi Tier System of Supports Guidance Document

Chapter 2: Creating a coaching program

Pennsylvania s Statewide System of School Support

Arkansas Department of Education Rules Governing Professional Development July 2005

Annual Report on Curriculum Instruction and Student. Achievement

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION

North Carolina Professional Teaching Standards

The Smart Way to Succeed in 2011

How To Improve Education Planning In Dekalb County Schools

Wisconsin Educator Effectiveness System. Principal Evaluation Process Manual

Trenton Public Schools Academic Plan

North Carolina Read to Achieve. A Guide to Implementing House Bill 950/S.L Section 7A

Chapter 8a Public Education Human Resource Management Act. Part 1 General Provisions

School Levels of Support. By Dr. Kristine Harms

FY 2016 Budget Request

Ohio Legislative Service Commission

Wythe County Public Schools Comprehensive Plan

TITLE 23: EDUCATION AND CULTURAL RESOURCES SUBTITLE A: EDUCATION CHAPTER I: STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION SUBCHAPTER b: PERSONNEL

SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PLAN

Fulda Independent School District 505

ON THE SAME PAGE EFFECTIVE IMPLEMENTATION OF COLLEGE- AND CAREER-READY STANDARDS THROUGH LABOR-MANAGEMENT COLLABORATION

Monroe Public Schools English Language Learner Program Description and Guidelines Revised, Fall 2012

2. Explain how the school will collect and analyze student academic achievement data.

Frequently Asked Questions Contact us:

TENNESSEE STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION

A Guide for Professional Development/Transition Planning for Implementation of the College- and Career-Ready Standards

TITLE 23: EDUCATION AND CULTURAL RESOURCES SUBTITLE A: EDUCATION CHAPTER I: STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION SUBCHAPTER b: PERSONNEL

Reading Specialist. Practicum Handbook Addendum to be used in conjunction with the Education Unit Practicum Handbook

How To Write A Curriculum Framework For The Paterson Public School District

IOWA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION

South Carolina Literacy Competencies. for Reading Coaches

North Carolina Read to Achieve

This notice will address the following components of PALS: assessment, training, testing requirements, intervention, and funding.

Kentucky. Guidelines. Digital Learning. Kentucky Department of Education. Dr. Terry Holliday, Commissioner

Transcription:

Informational Webinar for MDE Literacy Support Schools School Year 2015-2016 Agenda Literacy-Based Promotion Act (Senate Bill 2347) Overview Timeline Role of the MDE Literacy Coach District and School Role Questions and Answers District and School Points of Contact 2 1

Supporting Documents PowerPoint Literacy Coach Roles and Responsibilities NRTAC Study: A Study of the Effectiveness of K-3 Literacy Coaches The Learning Principal Article: Clarify the Coach s Role Mississippi Literacy-Based Promotion Act Implementation Guide 3 Literacy Based Promotion Act (2013) Statute Overview 2

Requirements for Public Schools Inform parents or legal guardians of the student s academic progress Provide intensive reading instruction and immediate intervention to each K - 3 student who exhibits a substantial deficiency in reading at any time, as demonstrated by performance on an MDE-approved reading screener or locally determined assessments and teacher observations 5 Parent Notification Requirements If a K - 3 student has been identified with a substantial deficit in reading, the teacher will immediately, and with each quarterly progress report, notify parents or legal guardians of the following in writing: Determination of a substantial deficit in reading Description of student services and supports presently provided Description of proposed supplemental instruction and support to remediate the student s deficit areas Strategies for parents to use to help students at home Notification that student will not be promoted to 4 th grade if reading deficiency can not be remediated by the end of 3 rd grade MDE Office of Elementary Education and Reading 6 3

Social Promotion and 3 rd Grade Summative Assessment A student may not be assigned a grade level based solely on age or any other factor that constitutes social promotion. Beginning in the 2014-2015 school year, a student scoring at the lowest achievement level in reading on the established state assessment for 3 rd grade will not be promoted to 4 th grade. A 3 rd grade student who fails to meet the academic requirements for promotion to the 4 th grade may be promoted for good cause. 7 Good Cause Exemptions a. Limited English Proficient students with less than two (2) years of instruction in English Language Learner program b. Students with disabilities whose Individualized Education Program (IEP) indicates that participation in the statewide accountability assessment program is not appropriate, as authorized under state law 8 4

Good Cause Exemptions c. Students with a disability who participate in the accountability assessment and who have an IEP or Section 504 plan that reflects that the student has received intense remediation in reading for two (2) years but still demonstrates a deficiency and was previously retained 9 Good Cause Exemptions d. Students who demonstrate an acceptable level of reading proficiency on an alternative assessment approved by the State Board of Education e. Students who receive intensive intervention for two or more years but still demonstrate deficiency in reading, and who previously were retained for two (2) years in any grade Kindergarten through 3 rd grade 10 5

Interventions for Students with Good Cause Exemptions Students promoted to 4 th grade based on good cause exemptions shall be provided intensive reading instruction and intervention informed by data and delivered through specific strategies in order to meet the students needs. 11 The school board of each school district must publish, in a newspaper that has general circulation within the school district, and report to the State Board of Education and the Mississippi Reading Panel the following information: The number and percentage of students given an approved alternate standardized reading assessment and the percentage of these students performing at each competency level of the alternate standardized assessment By grade, the number and percentage of all students retained in K-8 Information on the total number and percentage of students who were promoted for good cause, by each category of good cause Key Reporting Requirements of the Literacy-Based Promotion Act 12 6

LBPA Reporting Template A B C D E * * * * F 13 LBPA Reporting Template E 14 7

Funding for K-3 Literacy and MKAS2 $15 M is appropriated for the following: Training K - 3 teachers, principals, IHL faculty, and preservice teachers in literacy best practices Training school- and district-based literacy coaches Funding Literacy Support Grants Employing and training literacy coaches, regional literacy coordinators, and state K-3 literacy coordinators Supplying literacy resources to K-3 teachers Providing the MS K-3 Assessment Support System (MKAS2) Providing access to Renaissance Learning to all statefunded Pre-K-3 rd grade students in the state 15 Literacy Personnel State Literacy Coordinator (1) and Assistant State Literacy Coordinators (3) provide oversight and training; support and monitor statewide implementation 13 Regional Literacy Coordinators provide coaching to teachers in K-3 literacy target schools 2-3 days per week and support regional groups of literacy coaches 60 Literacy Coaches provide coaching, training, and modeling to teachers in K-3 literacy target schools 2-3 days per week 16 8

Literacy Efforts Timeline Timeline Date August 2013 - *Ongoing Activity Provide MDE literacy coach support to MDE Literacy Target Schools January 2014 June 2016 April 2015 LETRS training for K-3 teachers, principals, literacy coaches, pre-service teachers, and IHL faculty First administration of the 3 rd Grade Reading Summative Assessment to determine promotion to 4 th grade 2015-2016 Publish LBPA reporting requirements *Contingent upon legislative funding 18 9

MDE Literacy Coach Support 2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016 50 Schools 26 Districts 87 Schools 46 Districts 127 Schools 65 Districts 19 Role of the MDE Literacy Coach 10

Role of the Coach ACT Building capacity for literacy across the curriculum Promoting school-wide culture for literacy learning to include all stakeholders Improve and sustain student achievement through: PLAN Enhancing and refining reading instruction and intervention CHECK Targeting instructional coaching using the gradual release model DO 21 Instructional Support System The literacy coach: helps teachers recognize their instructional knowledge and strengths; supports teachers in their learning and application of new knowledge and instructional practices; promotes job-embedded learning and provides ongoing, sustainable support to teachers; and, uses data to provide differentiated support to individual teachers or small groups by grade level, by department, or by skill level. 22 11

Best Practices The literacy coach: works with students in whole and small-group instruction in the context of modeling, coteaching, and coaching; assists teachers in implementing explicit, systematic and rigorous reading instruction; and, ensures effective student grouping through the Response to Intervention (RtI) process. 23 Job-Embedded Professional Development The literacy coach: serves as a resource for professional development throughout a school to improve reading and literacy instruction and student achievement. provides initial and ongoing professional development to teachers in: the major reading components, based on an analysis of student performance data; the administration and analysis of instructional assessments; and, differentiated instruction and intensive intervention. 24 12

The literacy coach: Literacy Across the Curriculum promotes a school-wide culture for literacy learning; builds capacity for literacy across the curriculum; assists teachers with identifying the disciplinespecific literacy needs of students through the analysis of student data; and, assists teachers with implementing literacy strategies that are most effective for their students. 25 Literacy Coaches are NOT EVALUATORS Evaluators Substitute teachers Interventionists School administrators Tutors 26 13

Maintaining a Record of Services Bi-weekly coaching log (observing, co-teaching, modeling, conferencing, planning, etc.) Professional development request and evaluation forms Conferencing artifacts (pre-conference, observation, post-conference, next steps, followup) Observation tool Monthly Coaching Support Report 27 District and School Role 14

The Principal/Coach Relationship The principal/coach relationship is critical to the development and implementation of specific duties of the coach. Principals and coaches should work together to build a shared literacy vision and collaborative relationship to improve instruction and student achievement (Casey, 2006; Puig and Froelich, 2007). 29 The literacy coach cannot be effective without the consistent support of campus leaders. Wren & Reed, 2005 15

School Leadership Support Role The principal (administrative team): communicates through both words and behaviors that the literacy coach is not evaluating the performance of the teachers; holds staff accountable for working with the literacy coach to improve instruction; provides an opportunity for collaboration in the development of the School-wide Literacy Plan; meets frequently with the literacy coach to discuss goals and plans for activities; and, attends collaborative staff meetings. 31 School Wide Literacy Plan 32 16

Monitoring and Evaluation Procedures MDE Administer bi-annual formal evaluations of the coaches Monitor Bi-weekly submission of coach logs Site visits, Learning Walk, data analysis (formative and summative) Ongoing professional development and training Districts and Schools Regularly debrief with literacy coaches Conduct and analyze data from district and/or school observations Complete a survey of coaching support biannually (December and April) Analyze student data (formative and summative) 33 Benefits of Coaching Reported by Teachers An improved sense of professional skill An enhanced ability to analyze their own lessons A better understanding of teaching and learning A wider repertoire of instructional practices An increased sense of efficacy Robbins, P. (1991) 34 17

Benefits of Coaching Reported by Teachers(cont.) Stronger professional ties with colleagues Improved teaching performance Enhanced student progress A better articulated curriculum A more cohesive and positive school culture and climate 35 Expectations What is expected of the superintendent? What is expected of the principal? What is expected of the teacher? 36 18

Instruction aligned to CCRS Anchor Charts Writing to Text Data Walls/Rooms Word Walls PLCs Best Practices for MDE Literacy Target Schools Uninterrupted Reading Block MDE Office of Elementary Education and Reading 37 Questions & Answers District and School Points of Contact 19