Windows Server Infrastructure and Storage for SQL Server & Hyper-V

Similar documents
Windows Server Infrastructure for SQL Server

SMB Advanced Networking for Fault Tolerance and Performance. Jose Barreto Principal Program Managers Microsoft Corporation

SMB Direct for SQL Server and Private Cloud

Comparing SMB Direct 3.0 performance over RoCE, InfiniBand and Ethernet. September 2014

Hyper-V over SMB Remote File Storage support in Windows Server 8 Hyper-V. Jose Barreto Principal Program Manager Microsoft Corporation

Mellanox Cloud and Database Acceleration Solution over Windows Server 2012 SMB Direct

Hyper-V over SMB: Remote File Storage Support in Windows Server 2012 Hyper-V. Jose Barreto Principal Program Manager Microsoft Corporation

HP ProLiant BL660c Gen9 and Microsoft SQL Server 2014 technical brief

Windows Server 2012 授 權 說 明

StarWind Virtual SAN for Microsoft SOFS

Microsoft Windows Server in a Flash

Improve Business Productivity and User Experience with a SanDisk Powered SQL Server 2014 In-Memory OLTP Database

WITH A FUSION POWERED SQL SERVER 2014 IN-MEMORY OLTP DATABASE

High Throughput File Servers with SMB Direct, Using the 3 Flavors of RDMA network adapters

Windows 8 SMB 2.2 File Sharing Performance

Maximizing SQL Server Virtualization Performance

Cloud Optimize Your IT

Michael Kagan.

Best Practice of Server Virtualization Using Qsan SAN Storage System. F300Q / F400Q / F600Q Series P300Q / P400Q / P500Q / P600Q Series

Configuration Maximums

The Evolution of Microsoft SQL Server: The right time for Violin flash Memory Arrays

10th TF-Storage Meeting

Microsoft Windows Server Hyper-V in a Flash

Virtualizing Microsoft SQL Server 2008 on the Hitachi Adaptable Modular Storage 2000 Family Using Microsoft Hyper-V

Microsoft Windows Server Hyper-V in a Flash

IOmark- VDI. Nimbus Data Gemini Test Report: VDI a Test Report Date: 6, September

White Paper. Recording Server Virtualization

Storage Protocol Comparison White Paper TECHNICAL MARKETING DOCUMENTATION

Xangati Storage Solution Brief. Optimizing Virtual Infrastructure Storage Systems with Xangati

Network Attached Storage. Jinfeng Yang Oct/19/2015

Oracle Database In-Memory The Next Big Thing

Removing Performance Bottlenecks in Databases with Red Hat Enterprise Linux and Violin Memory Flash Storage Arrays. Red Hat Performance Engineering

Bosch Video Management System High Availability with Hyper-V

SQL Server 2014 New Features/In- Memory Store. Juergen Thomas Microsoft Corporation

ZD-XL SQL Accelerator 1.5

Brocade and EMC Solution for Microsoft Hyper-V and SharePoint Clusters

Virtual SAN Design and Deployment Guide

Dell Virtualization Solution for Microsoft SQL Server 2012 using PowerEdge R820

Microsoft SQL Server 2012 on Cisco UCS with iscsi-based Storage Access in VMware ESX Virtualization Environment: Performance Study

Microsoft SQL Server 2014 in a Flash

HP SN1000E 16 Gb Fibre Channel HBA Evaluation

High Availability with Windows Server 2012 Release Candidate

Diablo and VMware TM powering SQL Server TM in Virtual SAN TM. A Diablo Technologies Whitepaper. May 2015

AIX NFS Client Performance Improvements for Databases on NAS

SQL Server Virtualization

Building Enterprise-Class Storage Using 40GbE

Preview of Oracle Database 12c In-Memory Option. Copyright 2013, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved.

Software Defined Microsoft. PRESENTATION TITLE GOES HERE Siddhartha Roy Cloud + Enterprise Division Microsoft Corporation

3G Converged-NICs A Platform for Server I/O to Converged Networks

Using EonStor FC-host Storage Systems in VMware Infrastructure 3 and vsphere 4

Protect SQL Server 2012 AlwaysOn Availability Group with Hitachi Application Protector

Server and Storage Consolidation with iscsi Arrays. David Dale, NetApp

Configuration Maximums

Enabling Technologies for Distributed Computing

The Data Placement Challenge

SQL Server Business Intelligence on HP ProLiant DL785 Server

Rackspace Cloud Databases and Container-based Virtualization

Microsoft SMB File Sharing Best Practices Guide

Overview: X5 Generation Database Machines

SPEED your path to virtualization.

Building a Scalable Storage with InfiniBand

Optimizing Large Arrays with StoneFly Storage Concentrators

VMware vsphere Design. 2nd Edition

Oracle Database Scalability in VMware ESX VMware ESX 3.5

Deploying Affordable, High Performance Hybrid Flash Storage for Clustered SQL Server

Enabling Technologies for Distributed and Cloud Computing

Choices for implementing SMB 3 on non Windows Servers Dilip Naik HvNAS Pty Ltd Australians good at NAS protocols!

SMB remote file protocol (including SMB 3.0) SW Worth, Microsoft

Enterprise Storage Solution for Hyper-V Private Cloud and VDI Deployments using Sanbolic s Melio Cloud Software Suite April 2011

Virtualizing SQL Server 2008 Using EMC VNX Series and Microsoft Windows Server 2008 R2 Hyper-V. Proven Solution Guide

WHITE PAPER. How To Build a SAN. The Essential Guide for Turning Your Windows Server Into Shared Storage on Your IP Network

EMC Unified Storage for Microsoft SQL Server 2008

Best Practices for Virtualizing & Managing Exchange 2013

I/O Virtualization Using Mellanox InfiniBand And Channel I/O Virtualization (CIOV) Technology

High Performance Server SAN using Micron M500DC SSDs and Sanbolic Software

Getting the Most Out of Flash Storage

Virtualizing Microsoft SQL Server on Dell XC Series Web-scale Converged Appliances Powered by Nutanix Software. Dell XC Series Tech Note

Oracle Exadata: The World s Fastest Database Machine Exadata Database Machine Architecture

Post-production Video Editing Solution Guide with Microsoft SMB 3 File Serving AssuredSAN 4000

IOmark- VDI. HP HP ConvergedSystem 242- HC StoreVirtual Test Report: VDI- HC b Test Report Date: 27, April

PSAM, NEC PCIe SSD Appliance for Microsoft SQL Server (Reference Architecture) September 11 th, 2014 NEC Corporation

Zadara Storage Cloud A

How To Connect Virtual Fibre Channel To A Virtual Box On A Hyperv Virtual Machine

Storage Spaces. Storage Spaces

Best Practices for Virtualizing & Managing SharePoint 2013

HP 85 TB reference architectures for Microsoft SQL Server 2012 Fast Track Data Warehouse: HP ProLiant DL980 G7 and P2000 G3 MSA Storage

Technical Paper. Moving SAS Applications from a Physical to a Virtual VMware Environment

Running Microsoft SQL Server 2012 on a Scale-Out File Server Cluster via SMB Direct Connection Solution Utilizing IBM System x Servers

James Serra Sr BI Architect

Intel Ethernet Switch Load Balancing System Design Using Advanced Features in Intel Ethernet Switch Family

DELL. Dell Microsoft Windows Server 2008 Hyper-V TM Reference Architecture VIRTUALIZATION SOLUTIONS ENGINEERING

Accelerate SQL Server 2014 AlwaysOn Availability Groups with Seagate. Nytro Flash Accelerator Cards

Agenda. Enterprise Application Performance Factors. Current form of Enterprise Applications. Factors to Application Performance.

Deploying Microsoft SQL Server 2008 R2 with Logical Partitioning on the Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform with Hitachi Dynamic Tiering

Microsoft SMB Running Over RDMA in Windows Server 8

SAN Conceptual and Design Basics

Transcription:

Windows Server Infrastructure and Storage for SQL Server & Hyper-V Michael Frandsen michaelf@mentalnote.dk

Bio - Michael Frandsen I have worked in the IT industry for just over 23 years, 19 of these has been spent as a consultant. I have a close relationship with Microsoft R&D in Redmond, with the Windows team for 21 years, ever since the first beta of Windows NT 3.1, SQL server for 20 years, since the first version Microsoft did by themselves, v4.21a I am in various advisory positions in Redmond and am involved in vnext versions of Windows, Hyper-V, SQL Server and Office/SharePoint. Just finished Windows Blue (Windows 8.1 & Windows Server 2012 R2) and SQL14 (SQL Server 2014) Now working on SQL15. Specialty areas: Architecture & design High performance Storage Low Latency Kerberos Scalability (scale-up & scale-out) Consolidation (especially SQL Server) High-Availability VLDB Data Warehouse platforms BI platforms High Performance Computing (HPC) clusters Big Data platforms & architecture

Bio - Michael Frandsen

MentalNote Independent One-Man company with no affiliations Only selling consultancy deliverables No hardware sales No software sales Mission Excellence: Delivering knowledge and empowering clients through extensive and deep knowledge, always based on facts and objectiveness. This is achieved through a constant development of skills, by both internal research and partnerships with leading companies in the IT industry, such as Microsoft, HP and others, not only locally but mainly with these companies' Research and Development departments at their respective headquarters. Responsibility: Giving back to people, animals and places in need of support. Done with both manpower and funding of various causes, such as Cancer Research, Heart illness Animal Protection Terminally sick children, Orphans Developing Countries, Areas hit by natural disaster

SQL Server storage challenges Capacity Fast Shared Reliable

Performance The SAN legacy Because it s expensive it must be fast 3000 2500 2000 1500 1000 500 0 0 4 8 12 16 20 24 Price

The SAN legacy Shared storage or Direct Attached SAN File Server 2 x 8Gb/s Database Server 2 x 8Gb/s Mail Server 2 x 8Gb/s SAN 2 x 8Gb/s

The SAN legacy Widespread misconception

CACHE SQL SERVER WINDOWS CPU CORES MPIO Algorithm MPIO DSM WWN Zoning FC SWITCH Port Logic XOR Engine SCSI Controller The SAN legacy Complex stack FC HBA FC HBA A B A B A B CACHE STORAGE CONTROLLER A B A B DISK DISK LUN LUN DISK DISK SQL Server Read Ahead Rate CPU Feed Rate HBA Port Rate Switch Port Rate SP Port Rate LUN Read Rate Disk Feed Rate

SAN Bottleneck Typical Data Warehouse / BI / VLDB SAN load: High I/O processor load maxed out (top - slim rectangles) High cache load (Middle - big rectangles) Low disk spindle load (lower half - squares)

SAN Bottleneck Ideal Data Warehouse / BI / VLDB SAN load: Low to medium I/O processor load (top - slim rectangles) Low to medium cache load (Middle - big rectangles) High disk spindle load (lower half - squares)

Traditional interconnects Fibre Channel Stalled at 8Gb/s for many years 16Gb/s FC still very exotic Strong movement towards FCoE (Fibre Channel over Ethernet) iscsi Started in low-end storage arrays Many still 1Gb/s 10Gb/E storage arrays typically have few ports compared to FC NAS NFS, SMB, etc.

File Share reliability Is this mission critical technology?

SMB 1.0-100+ Commands Protocol negotiation, user authentication and share access (NEGOTIATE, SESSION_SETUP_ANDX, TRANS2_SESSION_SETUP, LOGOFF_ANDX, PROCESS_EXIT, TREE_CONNECT, TREE_CONNECT_ANDX, TREE_DISCONNECT) File, directory and volume access (CHECK_DIRECTORY, CLOSE, CLOSE_PRINT_FILE, COPY, CREATE, CREATE_DIRECTORY, CREATE_NEW, CREATE_TEMPORARY, DELETE, DELETE_DIRECTORY, FIND_CLOSE, FIND_CLOSE2, FIND_UNIQUE, FLUSH, GET_PRINT_QUEUE, IOCTL, IOCTL_SECONDARY, LOCK_AND_READ, LOCK_BYTE_RANGE, LOCKING_ANDX, MOVE, NT_CANCEL, NT_CREATE_ANDX, NT_RENAME, NT_TRANSACT, NT_TRANSACT_CREATE, NT_TRANSACT_IOCTL, NT_TRANSACT_NOTIFY_CHANGE, NT_TRANSACT_QUERY_QUOTA, NT_TRANSACT_QUERY_SECURITY_DESC, NT_TRANSACT_RENAME, NT_TRANSACT_SECONDARY, NT_TRANSACT_SET_QUOTA, NT_TRANSACT_SET_SECURITY_DESC, OPEN, OPEN_ANDX, OPEN_PRINT_FILE, QUERY_INFORMATION, QUERY_INFORMATION_DISK, QUERY_INFORMATION2, READ, READ_ANDX, READ_BULK, 14 distinct READ_MPX, WRITE READ_RAW, RENAME, SEARCH, SEEK, SET_INFORMATION, SET_INFORMATION2, TRANS2_CREATE_DIRECTORY, TRANS2_FIND_FIRST2, TRANS2_FIND_NEXT2, TRANS2_FIND_NOTIFY_FIRST, TRANS2_FIND_NOTIFY_NEXT, TRANS2_FSCTL, TRANS2_GET_DFS_REFERRAL, operations?!?? TRANS2_IOCTL2, TRANS2_OPEN2, TRANS2_QUERY_FILE_INFORMATION, TRANS2_QUERY_FS_INFORMATION, TRANS2_QUERY_PATH_INFORMATION, TRANS2_QUERY_PATH_INFORMATION, TRANS2_REPORT_DFS_INCONSISTENCY, TRANS2_SET_FILE_INFORMATION, TRANS2_SET_FS_INFORMATION, TRANS2_SET_PATH_INFORMATION, TRANSACTION, TRANSACTION_SECONDARY, TRANSACTION2, TRANSACTION2_SECONDARY, UNLOCK_BYTE_RANGE, WRITE, WRITE_AND_CLOSE, WRITE_AND_UNLOCK, WRITE_ANDX, WRITE_BULK, WRITE_BULK_DATA, WRITE_COMPLETE, WRITE_MPX, WRITE_MPX_SECONDARY, WRITE_PRINT_FILE, WRITE_RAW) Other (ECHO, TRANS_CALL_NMPIPE, TRANS_MAILSLOT_WRITE, TRANS_PEEK_NMPIPE, TRANS_QUERY_NMPIPE_INFO, TRANS_QUERY_NMPIPE_STATE, TRANS_RAW_READ_NMPIPE, TRANS_RAW_WRITE_NMPIPE, TRANS_READ_NMPIPE, TRANS_SET_NMPIPE_STATE, TRANS_TRANSACT_NMPIPE, TRANS_WAIT_NMPIPE, TRANS_WRITE_NMPIPE)

SMB 2.0-19 Commands Protocol negotiation, user authentication and share access (NEGOTIATE, SESSION_SETUP, LOGOFF, TREE_CONNECT, TREE_DISCONNECT) File, directory and volume access (CANCEL, CHANGE_NOTIFY, CLOSE, CREATE, FLUSH, IOCTL, LOCK, QUERY_DIRECTORY, QUERY_INFO, READ, SET_INFO, WRITE) Other (ECHO, OPLOCK_BREAK) TCP is a required transport SMB2 no longer supports NetBIOS over IPX, NetBIOS over UDP or NetBEUI

SMB 2.1 Performance improvement Up to 1MB MTU to better utilize 10Gb/E! Disabled by default! Real benefit required app support Ex. Robocopy in W7 / 2K8R2 is multi-threaded Defaults to 8 threads, range 1-128

SQL Server SMB support < 2008 Using UNC path could be enabled with trace flag Not officially supported scenario No support for system databases No support for failover clustering 2008 R2 UNC path fully supported by default No support for system databases No support for failover clustering

Two things happened SQL Server 2012 Windows Server 2012

SQL Server 2012 UNC support expanded System Databases supported on SMB Failover Clustering supports SMB as shared storage and TempDB can now reside on NON-shared storage Mark Souza commented: Great Suggestion!

Windows Server 2012 InfiniBand Teaming SMB 3.0 RDMA Multichannel SMB Direct

New old interconnects InfiniBand characteristics Been around since 2001 Used mainly for HPC clusters and Super Computing High throughput RDMA capable Low latency Quality of service Failover Scalable

InfiniBand throughput

InfiniBand throughput Trends in I/O Interfaces with Servers

InfiniBand throughput Low-level Uni-directional Bandwidth Measurements

Transparent Failover SQL Server or Hyper-V Server Normal operation \\fs1\share Failover to Node B Connections and handles autorecovered; application IO continues with no errors \\fs1\share File Server Node A File Server Node B File Server Cluster

SMB Multichannel Single RSS-capable SMB Client RSS Multiple 1GbE s 1GbE SMB Client 1GbE Multiple in a team SMB Client Teaming Multiple RDMA s /IB SMB Client /IB Full Throughput Bandwidth aggregation with multiple s Multiple CPUs cores engaged when using Receive Side Scaling (RSS) Switch RSS SMB Server Switch 1GbE 1GbE SMB Server Switch 1GbE 1GbE Switch Teaming SMB Server Switch Switch /IB /IB SMB Server Switch /IB /IB SMB Multichannel implements end-to-end failure detection Leverages teaming if present, but does not require it Automatic Configuration SMB detects and uses multiple network paths

SMB Multichannel RSS SMB Client CPU utilization per core Switch RSS SMB Server Core 1 Core 2 Core 3 Core 4

SMB Multichannel RSS SMB Client CPU utilization per core Switch RSS SMB Server Core 1 Core 2 Core 3 Core 4

SMB Multichannel RSS SMB Client 1 RSS SMB Client 2 Switch Switch Switch Switch RSS RSS SMB Server 1 SMB Server 2

SMB Multichannel RSS SMB Client 1 RSS SMB Client 2 Switch Switch Switch Switch RSS RSS SMB Server 1 SMB Server 2

MB/sec SMB Multichannel Performance SMB Client Interface Scaling - Throughput 5000 4500 4000 3500 3000 2500 2000 1500 1000 500 0 1 x 2 x 3 x 4 x I/O Size

RDMA in SMB 3.0 SMB over TCP and RDMA User Client 1 Application Unchanged API Memory 4 RDM A Memory File Server 1. Application (Hyper-V, SQL Server) does not need to change. Kernel SMB Client SMB Server 2. SMB client makes the decision to use SMB Direct at run time TCP/ IP NDKPI 2 SMB Direct SMB Direct NDKPI TCP/ IP 3. NDKPI provides a much thinner layer than TCP/IP No longer flow anything via regular TCP/IP 3 RDMA RDMA 4. Remote Direct Memory Access performed by the network interfaces. Ethernet and/or InfiniBand

SMB Direct and SMB Multichannel SMB Client 1 SMB Client 2 R- 54GbIB R- 54GbIB R- R- Switch 54GbIB Switch 54GbIB Switch Switch R- 54GbIB R- 54GbIB R- R- SMB Server 1 SMB Server 2

SMB Direct and SMB Multichannel SMB Client 1 SMB Client 2 R- 54GbIB R- 54GbIB R- R- Switch 54GbIB Switch 54GbIB Switch Switch R- 54GbIB R- 54GbIB R- R- SMB Server 1 SMB Server 2

The I/O picture to keep in mind Storage & network CPU Register CPU Cache Memory

NAND Flash Removes The Waste NAND Flash:

Impact of Increased CPU Utilization (Consolidation Effect)

Hyper-V v3.0 Only two goals: Adopt new technologies in the Win8 kernel Be the best hypervisor for SQL Server

Hyper-V v3.0 Microsofts initial idea up to November 2010 40% 35% 36% 33% Servers by number of CPU Sockets 30% 25% 20% 21% 15% 10% 5% 0% 6% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 2% 0% 0% 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 22 24

Hyper-V v3.0 New insight for the Hyper-V Team SQL instances by number of CPU Sockets 40% 35% 36% 30% 25% 24% 20% 15% 10% 16% 12% 11% 5% 0% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 2 3 4 5 6 8 11 12 14 15 16 24 CPU s

Hyper-V Team idea of Physical to Virtual Before: 750 Servers with SQL Server 920 SQL Server Instances 200TB Storage After: 780-790 Servers with Hypervisor and SQL Server 920 SQL Server Instances 200TB Storage

Real life consolidation on Physical servers Before: 750 Servers with SQL Server 920 SQL Server Instances 200TB Storage After: 6 Servers with SQL Server 12 SQL Server Instances 140TB Storage

Final specs of Hyper-V v3.0 Capability Hyper-V Server 2008 R2 Hyper-V Server 2012 Number of logical processors on host 64 320 Maximum supported RAM on host 1 TB 4 TB Virtual CPUs supported per host 512 2048 Maximum virtual CPUs supported per virtual machine 4 64 Maximum RAM supported per virtual machine 64 GB 1 TB Maximum running virtual machines supported per host 384 1024 Guest NUMA No Yes Maximum failover cluster nodes supported 16 64 Maximum number of virtual machines supported in failover clustering 1000 8000

Final specs of Hyper-V v3.0 So what about Storage? VMware tops out at 300,000 IOPS per VM A really good number A single Windows Server 2012 Hyper-V VM does: 985,000 IOPS

New things happened SQL Server 2014 (SQL14) Windows Server 2012 R2 (Windows Blue)

Windows Server 2012 R2 RTM September 5 th 2013 Both Server and Client Win8.1 Hyper-V v4.0 985.000 IOPS -> 1.300.000 IOPS Improved network performance 300.000 IOPS/ Improved Storage Spaces Caching Tiered Storage -> 450.000 IOPS/ Ex. 8K I/O from 950 MB/s -> 1.300 MB/s

SQL Server 2014 RTM April 1 st 2014 - (no aprils fool) Project Hekaton In-Memory OLTP Columnstore Index Clustered & Updateable Updated Always-On Improved reliability and scalability 8 replicas Completely New Query Engine For the first time control of IOPS with resource policies Buffer Pool Extension

Drivers In-Memory OLTP Tech Pillars Benefits Memory Optimized Tables Considerations High performance data operations Main-Memory Optimized Optimized for in-memory data Indexes (hash and range) exist only in memory No buffer pool Stream-based storage for durability Hardware trends Steadily declining memory price, NVRAM Table Constructs Fixed schema no ALTER TABLE, must drop/recreate/reload No LOB datatypes; row size limited 8060 No constraints support (PK only) No Identity or Calculated columns, CLR etc Data and table size considerations Size of tables = (row size * # of rows) Size of hash index = (bucket_count * 8-bytes) Max size SCHEMA_AND_DATA = 512 GB IO for Durability SCHEMA_ONLY vs. SCHEMA_AND_DATA Memory Optimized Filegroup Data and Delta files Transaction Log Database Recovery 60

Comparing Space Savings 101 Million Row Table + Index Space 19,7GB 10,9GB 5,0GB 4,0GB 6,9GB 1,8GB TABLE WITH CUSTOMARY INDEXING TABLE WITH CUSTOMARY INDEXING (PAGE COMPRESSION) TABLE WITH NO INDEXING TABLE WITH NO INDEXING (PAGE COMPRESSION) TABLE WITH COLUMNSTORE INDEX CLUSTERED COLUMNSTORE

Structure of In-Memory ColumnStore How It Works CREATE CLUSTERED COLUMNSTORE Organizes and compresses data into ColumnStore BULK INSERT Creates new ColumnStore Row Groups INSERT Rows are placed in the Delta Store (heap) When Row Store is big enough, a new ColumnStore Row Group is created DELETE Rows are marked in the Deleted Bitmap UPDATE Delete plus insert Most data is in ColumnStore format Partition ColumnStore Delta Store

Re-think hardware usage Storage Memory

Re-think hardware usage Storage Memory L5 Cache L4 Cache

Re-think hardware usage Storage Memory L2 RAM L1 RAM

Data Buffer Pool Manager Query Tree Cmd Parser Command TDS TDS Query Plan Optimizer Query Execut or Result Sets SNI Relational Engine Results Protocol Layer Plan Cache Transaction Log Access Methods GetPage D Data Cache Cached Pages Data Files Write I/O Transaction Manager Storage Engine Buffer Manager Read I/O Buffer Pool

Data IOPS Offload to Storage Class Memory (SCM) Query Tree Cmd Parser Command TDS TDS Query Plan Optimizer Query Execut or Result Sets SNI Relational Engine Results Protocol Layer Plan Cache Transaction Log Access Methods GetPage Cached Pages D Data Cache L2 Buffer Pool Data Files Write I/O Transaction Manager Storage Engine Buffer Manager Read I/O Buffer L1 Buffer Pool Pool PCIe Flash Fusion Fusion Fusion (SCM) IO IO IO

DIY Shared Storage New paradigm for SQL Server storage design Direct Attached Storage (DAS) Now with flexibility Converting DAS to shared storage Fast RAID controllers will be shared storage NAND Flash PCIe cards will be shared storage

New Paradigm designs Fusion Fusion Fusion PCIe Flash IO IO IO

New Paradigm designs File Server File Server NAND Flash Shared Storage Traditional SAN Shared Storage

New Paradigm designs File Server File Server NAND Flash Shared Storage Traditional SAN Shared Storage

Demo

Demo

Demo

Demo

Demo

Demo

Demo

Real life consolidation on Physical servers Before: 750 Servers with SQL Server 920 SQL Server Instances 200TB Storage After: 6 Servers with SQL Server 12 SQL Server Instances 140TB Storage

Real life consolidation on Physical servers How did we achieve the Storage savings? Databases by type 63% 37% System User

Share of disk space Digging deeper Further storage re-claims could easily be done in databases 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Disk capacity waste in SQL environments (350TB) 83% 57% 17% Allocated disk space Allocated database space Used database space Total free space

Typical large scale SQL Server deployments What you thought you needed What you decided to buy What your coders imposed on you What you would have run best on How you configured the hardware

Violin Memory WFA actual customer deployment Customer is a Logistics company operating in the Nordics Legacy platform: Development & Test: 455.000 rows/sec 21x Improvement in Production Production: 621.229 rows/sec With WFA: 13,24 mio. rows/sec 30x Improvement in Dev & Test

Violin Memory WFA actual customer deployment Using Updateable Clustered Column Store Index in SQL Server 2014 472x Improvement in Dev & Test 330x Improvement in Production 1,6x Savings In Storage

New things are happening again Win9 SQL15

Thank you Business Card: michaelf@mentalnote.dk on LinkedIn