LPAC/ARD Communication, Collaboration, and Compliance: Three Keys to Success



Similar documents
GRANDVIEW INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT ENGLISH AS A SECOND LANGUAGE POLICY AND PROCEDURES

Frequently Asked Questions Regarding ELL Programs

ESL HANDBOOK. CCISD ESL Handbook/01/11/2011/Curr/TBG

Medina Valley ISD Program for English Language Learners. Bilingual/ESL Program Procedures Guide

Brazos School for Inquiry and Creativity

Sweeny ISD. ESL Program Handbook

Comal ISD Bilingual & ESL Program Evaluation. Where Excellence is an Attitude!

Snyder ISD Implementation of Bilingual and English as a Second Language Programs

Name: Phone Number: To be eligible for state funding, a student in the bilingual or ESL education program must meet the following requirements:

English Language Learners

MARSHALL INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT BILINGUAL & ENGLISH AS A SECOND LANGUAGE EDUCATION PROGRAM

Bilingual /ESL Education

Dumas ISD 12/03/2012 BILINGUAL/ESL RESOURCE HANDBOOK

Chapter 5 English Language Learners (ELLs) and the State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness (STAAR) Program

PEIMS Coding

GUNTER ISD ENGLISH AS A SECOND LANGUAGE (ESL) PROCEDURES MANUAL

DATE ISSUED: 6/1/ of 9 LDU EK(REGULATION)-X

Student Success Initiative Manual

CHESTER COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT ESL PROGRAM

SAN BENITO CONSOLIDATED INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT

BILINGUAL/ESL EDUCATION PROGRAM

Accelerated Program of Instruction


La Joya ISD Office of Bilingual/ESL Education

Bilingual/ESL Instructional Plan

Texas English Language. Proficiency Assessment System (TELPAS)

State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness (STAAR TM ) Questions and Answers (Q&As) Updated March 9, 2012

Pennsylvania s ESL Requirements; Expectations Under Law. Presented by: Jamie McFadden ESL Teacher Saucon Valley School District

Session Objectives. What are the goals of Title III, Part A? Analyzing AMAO Data to Improve Instruction for ELL Students

Drafted March This special needs policy will help to ensure that: This policy addresses students in the following categories:

School District Appraisal Systems in Texas

Title III, Part A English Language Acquisition, Language Enhancement, and Academic Achievement Act

MEIGS COUNTY S 2003 ESL / OCR COMPLIANCE REPORT. Descriptive Report on Services to English Language Learners (ELL)

2012 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Guide

Chapter 7 Other Accountability System Processes

I. School- Wide DL Components

AUSTIN INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT INTERNAL AUDIT DEPARTMENT SPECIAL EDUCATION AUDIT PROGRAM

AISD K-5 ACCELERATED READING AND MATHEMATICS INSTRUCTION EVALUATION,

Annual Measurable Achievement Objectives (AMAOs) Title III, Part A Accountability System

MILLINOCKET SCHOOL DEPARTMENT. English as a Second Language (ESL) LAU PLAN

2. The AEC must be identified in AskTED (the Texas School Directory database) as an alternative campus.

FREQUENTLY-ASKED QUESTIONS. Allowable Use of Title III, Part A Funds

ELL Department Timeline

SB Individual Graduation Committees Frequently Asked Questions

IDENTIFICATION AND ASSESSMENT OF ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

Seven Generations Charter School 154 East Minor Street Emmaus, PA 18049

Gifted/Talented Education Frequently Asked Questions revised 02/13/12

Two steps are necessary to implement this process. 1. Administer the Home Language survey to all students enrolled in the school corporation.

Questions and Answers Regarding English Language Learners (ELLs) with Disabilities. Volume 10

TExES English as a Second Language Supplemental (154) Test at a Glance

Kindergarten. Frequently Asked Questions and Answers

DATE ISSUED: 11/7/ of 13 UPDATE 98 EHDE(LEGAL)-P

Oklahoma Profile of State High School Exit Exam Policies 2012

English Language Learners in District 64

Instructional Strategies for Supporting English Language Learners

Holistic Rating Training Requirements. Texas Education Agency Student Assessment Division

PINE GROVE AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT ESL PROGRAM

IDENTIFICATION, EVALUATION AND INTERVENTION FOR ELL STUDENTS WITH COMMUNICATION DISORDERS

Monroe Public Schools English Language Learner Program Description and Guidelines Revised, Fall 2012

Program Models. proficiency and content skills. After school tutoring and summer school available

The IEP Process: Frequently Asked Questions

English Learner Program Description White Bear Lake Area Schools

K-12 Lau (EL) Plan for Serving English Learners (ELs)

School District Summary

TELPAS Texas English Language Proficiency Assessment System

Settlement Agreement. Between. The United States. And. The Clay County School District

Illinois State Board of Education

English Language Learners Title III, Part A: Requirements and Allowability

Schuylkill Haven Area School District. August, 2011 ESL PROGRAM

Understanding Special Populations. New Licensed Staff Induction Program

Bilingual Education Student Information Survey (BESIS) Manual Special Education

STAAR. End-of-Course. State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness. Test Administrator Manual STAAR STAAR L STAAR A

ELEMENTARY GRADING HANDBOOK

Memorandum of Understanding

Tennessee State Board of Education August 5, 2011 First Reading Item: II. C. ESL Policy Revision

ESL PLAN. Adopted: October 28, 2002 Revised: September 2, Minersville Area School District P.O. Box 787 Minersville, PA 17954

State Compensatory Education Frequently Asked Questions School Year (Revised 10/1/13)

English as a Second Language Program Guide: Planning for English Language Learner Success. Department of Defense Education Activity

The Least Restrictive Environment (LRE): Question & Answer Document

Professional Development and Self-Efficacy of Texas Educators and the Teaching of English Language Learners

Chapter 89. Adaptations for Special Populations. Subchapter D. Special Education Services and Settings

FLORIDA TEACHER STANDARDS for ESOL ENDORSEMENT 2010

Alabama Profile of State High School Exit Exam Policies

Testing Accommodations For English Learners In New Jersey

Oklahoma City Public Schools. Lau Plan

Help! My Student Doesn t Speak English. 10 Tips To Help Your English Language Learners Succeed Today

Effective Sheltered Instruction Strategies

Ferndale Area School District. ESL Program and Guidelines

Section 9: Accommodations Tools for English Language Learners (ELLs)

Testing Calendar: Critical Dates

Spring 2016 TELPAS Holistic Rating Training System

Implementation of New CR Part 154 to Ensure High Quality Education for English Language Learners

Test administrators of the ACCESS for ELLs must have the following qualifications:

REGULATIONSPEQUANNOCK TOWNSHIP

Endorsements A. An endorsement shall be automatically renewed with the certificate on which it is posted. B. Except as noted, all

Title III English Language Acquisition

English Language Learners (ELL) Procedural Handbook MERAMEC VALLEY R-III SCHOOL DISTRICT

Critical Information about Accommodations for Students with Disabilities taking State Assessments

Technical Assistance Paper

Section 7: The Five-Step Process for Accommodations for English Language Learners (ELLs)

Transcription:

Interactive Convention 2014 Learning Labs LPAC/ARD Communication, Collaboration, and Compliance: Three Keys to Success Anna Mondragon & Jose Velazquez, ESC Region 19

Documentation of the process for considering special entry or exit criteria from Bilingual/English as a Second Language (ESL) Services Under 19 TAC 89.1225 (f)(4), and TAC 89.1225(k) DATE OF ARD: Name of Student: ID# Date of Birth: Special Education Eligibility: ENTRY DOCUMENTATION TAC 89.1225 (f)(4) /if applicable (4) The admission review and dismissal (ARD) committee in conjunction with the language proficiency assessment committee shall determine an appropriate assessment instrument and designated level of performance for indicating limited English proficiency as required under subsection (d) of this section for students for whom those tests would be inappropriate as part of the individualized education program (IEP). The decision for entry into a bilingual education or English as a second language program shall be determined by the ARD committee in conjunction with the language proficiency assessment committee in accordance with 89.1220(g) of this title (relating to Language Proficiency Assessment Committee). Does this student have a disability that significantly impacts the acquisition of English listening, speaking, reading, and writing? (For PK, K & 1, listening & speaking only) YES NO If yes, explain how the disability is affecting appropriate language acquisition: Is there a need to modify the Texas ELL Entry Criteria because tests are inappropriate as part of the individualized education program (IEP)? YES NO If yes, explain why there is a need to alter the criteria: What will be an appropriate oral language proficiency assessment instrument for this student? Decision for entry into a bilingual education or English as a second language program as determined by the ARD committee in conjunction with the LPAC.

Documentation of the process for considering special entry or exit criteria from Bilingual/English as a Second Language (ESL) Services Under 19 TAC 89.1225 (f)(4), and TAC 89.1225(k) DATE OF ARD: Name of Student: ID# Date of Birth: Special Education Eligibility: EXIT Documentation TAC 89.1225(k) / if applicable (k) The ARD committee in conjunction with the language proficiency assessment committee shall determine an appropriate assessment instrument and performance standard requirement for exit under subsection (h) of this section for students for whom those tests would be inappropriate as part of the IEP. The decision to exit a student who receives both special education and special language services from the bilingual education or English as a second language program is determined by the ARD committee in conjunction with the language proficiency assessment committee in accordance with applicable provisions of subsection (h) of this section. Is there a need to modify the Texas ESL Exit Criteria? YES NO Evidence of the need for use of 89.1225 (k) (evidence must include historical formal and informal data, teacher input, and formative evaluations. Specify Assessments and English Language Proficiency Test Standards Academic content assessment of Reading and Writing: English Language Proficiency Assessments: Listening: Speaking: Reading: Writing: At the end of the year, the ARD committee, with key LPAC members, meets to review the assessment results and subjective teacher evaluation required under TAC 89.1225(h) to determine whether the student has met the modified exit criteria.

LPAC/ARD COMMUNICATION, COLLABORATION, AND COMPLIANCE: THREE KEYS TO SUCCESS Jose Velazquez Anna Mondragon SESSION OVERVIEW The State requires the Admission Review and Dismissal (ARD) committee to work closely with the Language Proficiency Assessment Committee (LPAC) to determine entry and exit criteria for students who are receiving special education services and identified as limited English proficient (LEP). This session will highlight and clarify key requirements in this decision-making process that support the best interest of the student. THE LPAC FRAMEWORK MANUAL CAN BE ACCESSED THROUGH THE TEA ELL WEB PORTAL AT: www.elltx.org

INTRODUCTION 19 Texas Administrative Code (TAC) Chapter 89 Adaptations for Special Populations, Subchapter BB The Commissioner s Rules concerning the state plan for educating Limited English proficient (LEP) students state that all school districts that are required to provide bilingual education and/or English as a Second Language (ESL) programs establish and operate a LPAC. LIVEBINDER http://www.livebinders.com/play/play?id=1364360 &backurl=/shelf/my PURPOSE OF THE LPAC FRAMEWORK The Framework delineates the steps that must be followed in the: Identification Assessing students whose Home Language Survey has a language other than English and who are determined to have limited English proficiency Processing LPAC meets to review assessment information in order to make placement decisions

PURPOSE OF THE LPAC FRAMEWORK, CONT. Placement Determining the appropriate program for students identified as limited English proficient (LEP) Monitoring Reviewing progress and performance of LEP students in their intensive language instruction program as well as the determination for exit and follow up of students as they transition into an all-english program ELIGIBILITY FOR STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES Students with disabilities whose scores indicate limited English proficiency on the assessment determined by the key members of the ARD committee in conjunction with the key members of the LPAC are identified as LEP. 19 TAC 89.1225 (f)(4) and (g), 89.1230 19 TAC 89.1225 (F)(4), (4) The ARD committee in conjunction with the LPAC shall determine an appropriate assessment instrument and designated level of performance for indicating limited English proficiency as required under subsection (d) of this section for students for whom those tests would be inappropriate as part of the individualized education program (IEP). The decision for entry into a bilingual education or English as a second language program shall be determined by the ARD committee in conjunction with the LPAC in accordance with 89.1220(g) of this title (relating to Language Proficiency Assessment Committee).

19 TAC 89.1225 (G), (g) Within 20 school days of their initial enrollment in the school district, students shall be identified as English language learners and enrolled into the required bilingual education or English as a second language program. Prekindergarten and kindergarten students preregistered in the spring shall be identified as English language learners and enrolled in the required bilingual education or English as a second language program within 20 school days of the start of the school year in the fall. 89.1230 (A) (a) School districts shall implement assessment procedures that differentiate between language proficiency and handicapping conditions in accordance with Subchapter AA of this chapter (relating to Commissioner's Rules Concerning Special Education Services) and shall establish placement procedures that ensure that placement in a bilingual education or English as a second language program is not refused solely because the student has a disability. ELIGIBILITY FOR STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES 19 TAC 89.1225 (f)(4), and (g) 89.1230 LPAC Framework steps: Identification; Processing; Placement; Monitoring Documentation LEA Documentation Sped-ELL Entry-Exit form.docx

ASSESSMENT DECISIONS FOR ELLS RECEIVING SPECIAL EDUCATION SERVICES ELLs receiving special education services may be administered any assessment depending on whether they meet the participation requirements STAAR STAAR Spanish STAAR L STAAR Modified STAAR Alternate Chapter 101 of the TAC requires the LPAC to work in conjunction with the ARD committee to make assessment decisions for these students The collaboration helps ensure that factors related to disabling conditions and second language acquisition are both carefully considered STAAR MODIFIED & STAAR ALTERNATE ELLs receiving special education services may be administered these assessments if they meet the specific participation requirements for these assessment programs ARD committee forms for determining whether students meet the participation requirements are on the TEA STAAR Modified and STAAR Alternate webpages The participation requirements for these assessments are very specific Few students receiving special education are eligible ; the number of eligible ELLs will be very small STAAR MODIFIED & STAAR ALTERNATE Important: ELLs participate in these assessments only on the basis of their disability, not second language acquisition The LPAC s involvement in assessment decisionmaking for ELLs served by special education should help ensure that ELL participation in these assessments is appropriate

NOTE REGARDING TELPAS All students coded LEP on PEIMS will participate in TELPAS Some LEP students receiving Special Education services may qualify for an ARD exemption for TELPAS by domain based on the handicapping condition. STAAR MODIFIED OR STAAR ALTERNATE STUDENTS Once criteria for one of these alternate assessments is met the committee may choose to discuss the process for considering a special exit criteria. Under 19 TAC 89.1225(k) PROCESS FOR CONSIDERING SPECIAL EXIT CRITERIA FROM BILINGUAL/ENGLISH AS A SECOND LANGUAGE (ESL) SERVICES UNDER 19 TAC 89.1225(K) (k) The ARD committee in conjunction with the LPAC shall determine an appropriate assessment instrument and performance standard requirement for exit under subsection (h) of this section for students for whom those tests would be inappropriate as part of the IEP. The decision to exit a student who receives both special education and special language services from the bilingual education or English as a second language program is determined by the ARD committee in conjunction with the LPAC in accordance with applicable provisions of subsection (h) of this section. 2013-2014- Process for Exiting of SPED-LEP Final.pdf

ACCOMMODATIONS FOR ELLS WITH DISABILITIES For these students, LPACs are responsible for making accommodation decisions for the STAAR program in conjunction with the student s ARD or Section 504 committee, as applicable Linguistic accommodation decisions Accommodation decisions related to the student s disability These committees should become familiar with all accommodation information on the TEA Accommodation Resources webpage ANNUAL REVIEW At the end of the year, the Committee reviews every child identified as limited English proficient being served with parental denials exited during the previous 2 years that are being monitored who has met exit criteria. The LPAC will continue to monitor the student for 2 additional years ANNUAL REVIEW The LPAC should review: Benchmarks Classroom Tests State Criterion Test Data (TAKS/STAAR) Norm-referenced English and Spanish (when applicable) Standardized Achievement Test Data Oral Language Proficiency Test Data TELPAS, TPRI, Tejas LEE, etc. Grades Any input that will give a well-rounded picture of the student s growth and progress What about SPED/LPE students and the end of the annual review? LEA Documentation Sped-ELL Entry-Exit form.docx