CLINICAL STUDIES WITH ANTIANGIOGENIC STRATEGIES FOR MALIGNANT GLIOMA



Similar documents
Management of low grade glioma s: update on recent trials

PRIMARY GLIOMA (oligodendroglioma, astrocytoma, oligodendroglioma, oligoastrocytoma, including anaplastic, gliosarcoma and glioblastoma multiforme)

PARP inhibitors and TEMOZOLAMIDE in BRAIN TUMORS. Idoia Morilla Ruiz

Glioblastoma (cancer affecting the brain) A guide for journalists on glioblastoma and its treatment

Treatment Options for Glioblastoma and other Gliomas

PROSPETTIVE FUTURE NEL TRATTAMENTO. Cinzia Ortega Dipartimento di Oncologia Medica Fondazione del Piemonte per l Oncologia I.R.C.C.S.

High Grade Gliomas: Update in Treatment and Care Ryan T. Merrell, M.D. Clinical Assistant Professor of Neurology NorthShore University HealthSystem

Avastin in breast cancer: Summary of clinical data

Name of Policy: Tumor-Treating Fields Therapy for Glioblastoma

Treatment Options for Glioblastoma and other Gliomas

SAKK Lung Cancer Group. Current activities and future projects

a Phase 2 prostate cancer clinical trial is ongoing. Table 2: Squalamine vs Standard-of-care literature

National Horizon Scanning Centre. Vandetanib (Zactima) for advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer. December 2007

Monoclonal Antibodies in Cancer. Ralph Schwall, PhD Associate Director, Translational Oncology Genentech, Inc.

U.S. Food and Drug Administration

Management of stage III A-B of NSCLC. Hamed ALHusaini Medical Oncologist

How To Predict Prognosis From An Eortc Gb

Avastin in breast cancer: Summary of clinical data

Targeted Therapy What the Surgeon Needs to Know

Decision to Continue the Development of Tecemotide (L-BLP25) in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer to be Announced

IMMUNOMEDICS, INC. February Advanced Antibody-Based Therapeutics. Oncology Autoimmune Diseases

How To Treat Mesothelioma With A Tumor Stem Cell Inhibitor

What is the reference cytotoxic regimen in advanced gastric cancer?

How To Understand The Effects Of A Drug On Your Health

Clinical Trials for Patients with

Standardized MRI Protocol for Brain Tumor Clinical Trials. Benjamin M. Ellingson, Ph.D. Assistant Professor of Radiology at UCLA

The Need for a PARP in vivo Pharmacodynamic Assay

Historical Basis for Concern

What is Glioblastoma? How is GBM classified according to the WHO Grading System? What risk factors pertain to GBM?

Radioterapia panencefalica. Umberto Ricardi

PARP inhibition basic science and clinical challenge. Thomas Helleday, PhD

Anti-PD1 Agents: Immunotherapy agents in the treatment of metastatic melanoma. Claire Vines, 2016 Pharm.D. Candidate

Treatment Options for Glioblastoma and other Gliomas

MULTIPLE MYELOMA. Dr Malkit S Riyat. MBChB, FRCPath(UK) Consultant Haematologist

THE CANCER STEM CELL INHIBITORS VS-6063 AND VS-5584 EXHIBIT SYNERGISTIC ANTICANCER ACTIVITY IN PRECLINICAL MODELS OF MESOTHELIOMA

Nieuwe ontwikkelingen op het gebied van de angiogeneseremmers

Targeting Specific Cell Signaling Pathways for the Treatment of Malignant Peritoneal Mesothelioma

Endpoint Selection in Phase II Oncology trials

Avastin in Metastatic Breast Cancer

Miquel Àngel Seguí Palmer

CURRICULUM VITAE Heinrich Elinzano, MD

Chemotherapy or Not? Anthracycline or Not? Taxane or Not? Does Density Matter? Chemotherapy in Luminal Breast Cancer: Choice of Regimen.

Targeting angiogenesis in NSCLC: Clinical trial update Martin Reck Lung Clinic Grosshansdorf Grosshansdorf, Germany

Technology appraisal guidance Published: 27 June 2007 nice.org.uk/guidance/ta121

Glioblastoma: Is Survival Possible? By Ben A. Williams Copyright, 2014

Metastatic Breast Cancer 201. Carolyn B. Hendricks, MD October 29, 2011

Multimodality imaging of brain tumours: High Grade Brain Tumours

Gentest für DCIS? SENOLOGIE update Mai 2015 Kongress-Eventzentrum LAKE SIDE Prof. Bernhard Pestalozzi, Klinik für Onkologie, USZ

Trials in Elderly Melanoma Patients (with a focus on immunotherapy)

18.5 Percent Overall Response Rate Observed in Pembrolizumab-Treated Patients with this Aggressive Form of Breast Cancer

Drug/Drug Combination: Bevacizumab in combination with chemotherapy

NCCN Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer V Update Meeting 07/09/10

Mesothelioma. Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma

M. Ugolini 1,2, G. Babini 1,2, G. Baiocco 1,2, D. Cappelletti 1,2, L. Mariotti 1,2, J. Morini 1,2,3 and A. Ottolenghi 1,2

Gemcitabine, Paclitaxel, and Trastuzumab in Metastatic Breast Cancer

Towards the utilization of cannabinoids as anti-cancer

Biomarker Trends in Breast Cancer Research

Ovarian Cancer and Modern Immunotherapy: Regulatory Strategies for Drug Development

Prognostic value of MGMT promoter methylation in glioblastoma patients treated with temozolomide-based chemoradiation: A Portuguese multicentre study

Maintenance therapy in in Metastatic NSCLC. Dr Amit Joshi Associate Professor Dept. Of Medical Oncology Tata Memorial Centre Mumbai

L Lang-Lazdunski, A Bille, S Marshall, R Lal, D Landau, J Spicer

The Clinical Trials Process an educated patient s guide

BRAIN CANCER TREATMENT REGIMENS (Part 1 of 5)

CD22 Antigen Is Broadly Expressed on Lung Cancer Cells and Is a Target for Antibody-Based Therapy

Lung Cancer Research: From Prevention to Cure!

New Directions in Treatment of Ovarian Cancer. Amit M. Oza Princess Margaret Hospital University of Toronto

Advances in Treatment of Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma: A Reason for Hope

WntResearch. Foxy-5 A unique Phase 1 opportunity to combat the spreading of cancer

Come è cambiata la storia naturale della malattia

AMERICAN BRAIN TUMOR ASSOCIATION. Glioblastoma and Malignant Astrocytoma

OI PARP ΑΝΑΣΤΟΛΕΙΣ ΣΤΟΝ ΚΑΡΚΙΝΟ ΤΟΥ ΜΑΣΤΟΥ ΝΙΚΟΛΑΙΔΗ ΑΔΑΜΑΝΤΙΑ ΠΑΘΟΛΟΓΟΣ-ΟΓΚΟΛΟΓΟΣ Β ΟΓΚΟΛΟΓΙΚΗ ΚΛΙΝΙΚΗ ΝΟΣ. ΜΗΤΕΡΑ

New Trends & Current Research in the Treatment of Lung Cancer, Pt. II

CLINICAL POLICY Department: Medical Management Document Name: Opdivo Reference Number: CP.PHAR.121 Effective Date: 07/15

Cure versus control: Which is the best strategy?

Malignant Mesothelioma State of the Art

Foundational Issues Related to Immunotherapy and Melanoma

Molecular markers and clinical trial design parallels between oncology and rare diseases?

Clinical Trials of Lapatinib in Patients with Brain Metastases. Nancy U Lin, MD Dana Farber Cancer Institute March 1, 2009

BioPATH: A Study of Biomarker Profiles in Asia Pacific HER2 Breast Cancer Patients Treated with Lapatinib and Other Anti-HER2 Therapy

Cancer Treatments Subcommittee of PTAC Meeting held 18 September (minutes for web publishing)

Sur les nouveaux médicaments et les perspectives qu ils offrent (traitement à la carte et survie longue)

The Science behind Proton Beam Therapy

Is the third-line chemotherapy feasible for non-small cell lung cancer? A retrospective study

MOLOGEN AG. Q1 Results 2015 Conference Call Dr. Matthias Schroff Chief Executive Officer. Berlin, 12 May 2015

Clinical Trial Design. Sponsored by Center for Cancer Research National Cancer Institute

Predictive Biomarkers for Tumor Immunotherapy: Are we ready for clinical implementation? Howard L. Kaufman Rush University

Combining radiation therapy with immunotherapy: clinical translation. Silvia C Formenti, M.D.

Breast Cancer Update 2014 Prevention, Risk, and Treatment of Early Stage Breast Cancer. Kevin R. Fox, MD University of Pennsylvania

Integrating Chemotherapy and Liver Surgery for the Management of Colorectal Metastases

What is the Optimal Front-Line Treatment for mrcc? Michael B. Atkins, MD Deputy Director, Georgetown-Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center

Adjuvant Therapy Non Small Cell Lung Cancer. Sunil Nagpal MD Director, Thoracic Oncology Jan 30, 2015

Transcription:

CLINICAL STUDIES WITH ANTIANGIOGENIC STRATEGIES FOR MALIGNANT GLIOMA C. Schichor, J.-C. Tonn Klinik für Neurochirurgie Ludwig-Maximilians Universität München - Großhadern University Hospital Munich Großhadern Department of Neurosurgery, Germany

Integrin structure and signalling Harburger DS & Calderwood DA, J Cell Sci 2009;122:159 163 Askari JA, et al. J Cell Sci 2009;122:165 170

Integrin α v β 3 expression in glioblastomas * 100 µm 100 µm 100 µm Integrin α v β 3 CD31 (endothelial cells) Integrin α v β 3 /CD31 fluorescent overlay Schnell O, et al. Brain Pathol 2008;18:378 386

Statistical analysis of α v β 3 expression Positive detected tissue Mean staining intensity Overall tumor tissue * mild * moderate strong * 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 Positive tissue in analyzed area (%) 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 Staining intensity in relation to M21 (%) 30 20 10 0 20 10 0 GBM LGG Non-CNS GBM LGG Positive detected glial tissue Mean staining intensity in glial cells Glial tissue only Positive glial tissue in analyzed area (%) * 100 mild * 100 90 90 80 moderate strong * 80 70 70 60 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 50 40 30 Staining intensity in relation to M21 (%) 20 10 0 GBM LGG GBM LGG *p<0.05; Student's t test Schnell O, et al. Brain Pathol 2008;18:378 386

[ 18 F]-galacto Arg-Gly-Asp (RGD) positronemission tomography for glioblastoma A B E L L C D L Schnell O, et al. Neuro Oncol 2009 Apr. 28

Summary of preclinical data Key interpretations Cilengitide: Blocks binding of α V integrins to ECM Anti-angiogenic Key experiments Receptor and cell-based inhibition. Co-crystal cilengitide and α V β 3 1 3 Rabbit cornea, mouse retina model, CAM: blocks growth factor-induced angiogenesis 1,4,5 Blocks endothelial cell proliferation HUVECs in vitro; CAM 1,4,6 Blocks adhesion, migration, and differentiation HUVECs, HBMECs, tumor cell lines. Differentiation of endothelia 2,6,7 Induces apoptosis Additive activity in combination with a wide variety of classical and molecular-targeted therapeutics HUVECs and tumor cells in vitro. Growth factor-stimulated endothelia, glioblastoma in vivo 2,7,8 Significantly enhances anti-tumor and anti-angiogenic efficacy in preclinical combination models 9,10 CAM=chorioallantoic membrane; ECM=extracellular matrix; HBMECs=human brain microvascular endothelial cells; HUVECs=human umbilical vein endothelial cells 1. Dechantsreiter MA, et al. J Med Chem 1999;42:3033 3040; 2. Nisato RE, et al. Angiogenesis 2003;6:105 119; 3. Xiong JP, et al. Science 2002;296:151 155; 4. Friedlander M, et al. Science 1995;270:1500 1502; 5. Hammes HP, et al. Nat Med 1996;2:529 533; 6. Loges S, et al. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2007;357:1016 1020; 7. Albert JM, et al. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2006;65:1536 1543; 8. Taga T, et al. Int J Cancer 2002;98:690 697; 9. Tentori L, et al. Oncol Rep 2008;19:1039 1043; 10. Lode HN, et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1999;96:1591 1596

Cilengitide: Mechanism of action Results from early clinical trials support the hypothesis that cilengitide: Blocks integrins α V β 3 and α V β 5 Those integrins are expressed on tumor cells and endothelial cells Cilengitide, therefore, has a dual mode of action Direct anti-tumor activity Anti-angiogenic activity

Cilengitide: Mechanism of action Results from early clinical trials support the hypothesis that cilengitide: Blocks integrins α V β 3 and α V β 5 Those integrins are expressed on tumor cells and endothelial cells Cilengitide, therefore, has a dual mode of action Direct anti-tumor activity Anti-angiogenic activity

Single agent: Partial response lasting >18 months August 2005 April 2007 Reardon D, et al. J Clin Oncol 2008;26:5610 5617

EMD 121974 010 Phase I/IIa trial of cilengitide and temozolomide with concomitant radiotherapy, followed by temozolomide and cilengitide maintenance therapy, in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma

Study design Concomitant phase Adjuvant phase (6 months) + C i l e n g i t i d e (twice weekly IV) Temozolomide (TMZ) daily x 6 weeks RT (30 x 2 Gy) TMZ 75 mg/m 2 daily (7/7) during RT Maintenance 150 200 mg/m 2 x 5 days for 6 cycles RT 60 Gy (30 x 2 Gy), to start 3 5 weeks post-surgery Cilengitide 500 mg flat dose twice weekly IV to start 1 week before TMZ/RT, continue throughout chemoradiotherapy, optional single-agent maintenance after completion of 6 cycles of TMZ Primary endpoint: PFS rate after 6 months of treatment Stupp R, et al. Society for Neuro-Oncology, 12th Annual Meeting, Dallas, TX, USA, November 2007, Abstract No. MA-10; Stupp R, et al. J Clin Oncol 2007;25(Suppl. 18):Abstract No. 2000 (updated information presented)

Cilengitide vs historical controls: Overall survival 1.00 Survival 0.75 0.50 0.25 X X X Lausanne pilot X EORTC Cilengitide X 0.00 0 5 10 15 20 25 Time (months) Stupp R, et al. Society for Neuro-Oncology, 12th Annual Meeting, Dallas, TX, USA, November 2007, Abstract No. MA-10 Stupp R, et al. N Engl J Med 2005;352:987 96

Cilengitide vs historical controls: Overall survival and MGMT MGMT gene-promoter status: Unmethylated Methylated X EORTC Lausanne pilot Cilengitide 1.00 0.75 X 1.00 0.75 X X Survival 0.50 0.25 X X Survival 0.50 0.25 X X 0.00 0.00 0.0 5 10 15 20 25 0.0 5 10 15 20 25 Time (months) Time (months) Stupp R, et al. Society for Neuro-Oncology, 12th Annual Meeting, Dallas, TX, USA, November 2007, Abstract No. MA-10; Hegi ME, et al. CCR 2004 including update; Hegi ME, et al. N Engl J Med 2005;352:997 1003

Cilengitide vs historical controls: Overall survival and MGMT MGMT gene-promoter status: Unmethylated Methylated X EORTC Lausanne pilot Cilengitide 1.00 0.75 X 1.00 0.75 X X Survival 0.50 0.25 X X Survival 0.50 0.25 X X 0.00 0.00 0.0 5 10 15 20 25 0.0 5 10 15 20 25 Time (months) Time (months) Stupp R, et al. Society for Neuro-Oncology, 12th Annual Meeting, Dallas, TX, USA, November 2007, Abstract No. MA-10; Hegi ME, et al. CCR 2004 including update; Hegi ME, et al. N Engl J Med 2005;352:997 1003

A collaboration of EORTC & Merck Cilengitide phase III for newly diagnosed GBM Step 1: Central MGMT methylation status assay Step 2: Randomization versus control Diagnosis Max. 28 days MGMT methyl. MGMT not methyl. or undetermined R Novel strategies per local policy or phase II trials + cilengitide TMZ Radiotherapy Concomitant phase Adjuvant (maintenance) phase

Adapted from Bergers, et al. Nature 2002 University Hospital Munich Großhadern Department of Neurosurgery, Germany

Bevacizumab (Avastin) VEGF VEGFR-2 VEGFR-2 VEGF Bevacizumab Extracellular Endothelial cell Intracellular ANGIOGENESIS Angiogenesis is mediated primarily through the interaction between VEGF and VEGFR-2 ANGIOGENESIS Bevacizumab inhibits VEGF extracellularly and, therefore, may inhibit angiogenesis without disrupting targets outside the VEGF pathway Hicklin, Ellis. JCO 2005 University Hospital Munich Großhadern Department of Neurosurgery, Germany

Normale Blutgefäße Abnormale, chaotische Blutgefäße Normalisierte Durchblutung 1. Sturk, Dumont. In: Basic Science of Oncology 2005 ; 2. Gerber, Ferrara. Cancer Res 2005 3. Jain. Nat Med 2001; 4. Jain. Science 2005; 5. Kerbel. Science 2006 Figure reprinted by permission from Macmillan Publishers Ltd: Jain. Nature Med;7(9):987 9, copyright 2001 University Hospital Munich Großhadern Department of Neurosurgery, Germany

FRÜHE EFFEKTE ANHALTENDE EFFEKTE 1 Regression 2 Normalisation 3 Inhibition Abnahme der Tumorgröße Verbesserte Verteilung von Chemotherapie Unterdrückung von Gefäßeinsprossung Reduktion Rezidivwachstum Willett, et al. Nat Med 2004; Gerber, Ferrara. Cancer Res 2005 University Hospital Munich Großhadern Department of Neurosurgery, Germany

Recurrent GBM Response to Bevazizumab + PC-Chemotherapy

Recurrent GBM Response to Bevazizumab + PC-Chemotherapy

Recurrent GBM Response to Bevazizumab + PC-Chemotherapy

Recurrent GBM Response to Bevazizumab + PC-Chemotherapy

Recurrent GBM Response to Bevazizumab + PC-Chemotherapy mismatch MRI / FET-PET

University Hospital Munich Großhadern Department of Neurosurgery, Germany

Überblick zur klinischen Wirksamkeit von Bevacizumab bei rezidiviertem Glioblastom Therapie Autor n Bevacizumab oder Bevacizumab + Irinotecan Ansprechrate (%) PFS-6 (%) Medianes Gesamtüberleben (Monate) Friedman 167 28,2 / 37,8 42,6 / 50,3 9,2 / 8,7 Bevacizumab + Irinotecan Vredenburgh 35 57 46 10 Bevacizumab, bei erneuter PD Bevacizumab + Irinotecan Bevacizumab + Irinotecan (retrospektiv) Bevacizumab + Irinotecan (retrospektiv) Bevacizumab + Irinotecan (retrospektiv) Kreisl 48 35 29 7,5 Poulsen 27 30 40 7 Norden 33 34 42 n.a Zuniga 37 n.a. 64 11,5 Friedman HS et al. J Clin Oncol 2009; published ahead of print on August 31. Vredenburg JJ et al. J Clin Oncol 2008;25:4722 4729. Kreisl TN et al. J Clin Oncol 2009;27(5):740 745. Poulsen HS et al. Acta Oncol 2009;48:52 58. Norden AD et al. Neurology 2008;70(10):779 87. Zuniga RM et al. J Neurooncolog 2009;91(3):329 336 University Hospital Munich Großhadern Department of Neurosurgery, Germany

Medikamentöse Therapie des rezidivierten Glioblastoms: Patienten mit Temozolomid-Vorbehandlung Behandlung CR + PR (%) Progressionsfreies Überleben nach 6 Monaten (%) Medianes Gesamt- Überleben (Wochen) Prospektive Studien Wick et al. 2009 (n = 92) CCNU 4 19 30 Van den Bent et al. 2009 (n = 56) Retrospektive Studien BCNU oder TMZ 10 24 31 Happold et al. 2009 (n = 32) ACNU ±VM26/AraC Perry et al. 2008 (n = 35) TMZ 28/28 14 31 Wick et al. 2009 (n = 47) TMZ Diverse Wick et al. J Clin Oncol 2009; in press. Van den Bent et al. J Clin Oncol 2009; 27: 1268 1274. Happold C et al. J Neurooncol 2009; 92: 45 8. Perry et al. Cancer 2008; 113: 2152 7. Wick et al. J Neurol 2009; 256:734-41 6 20 29 10 28 25 University Hospital Munich Großhadern Department of Neurosurgery, Germany

University Hospital Munich Großhadern Department of Neurosurgery, Germany

Zulassungsstudie Bevacizumab bei rezidiviertem Glioblastom Patienten mit Glioblastom randomisiert nach erstem oder zweitem Rezidiv (N = 167) 1:1 Bevacizumab* (n = 85) Bevacizumab/ Irinotecan** (n = 82) Erkrankungsprogression (PD) Optionale Post-PD- Phase Bevacizumab + Irinotecan Stratifikation nach: KPS: 70 80, 90 100 Erstes, zweites Rezidiv * Bevacizumab: 10 mg/kg alle 2 Wochen ** Irinotecan: EIAED: 340 mg/m 2 i.v. über 90 min Non-EIAED: 125 mg/m 2 i.v. über 90 min Enzyminduzierende Antiepileptika (EIAED) Ein Behandlungszyklus = 6-wöchige Therapiephase Friedman HS et al. J Clin Oncol 2009; University Hospital Munich Großhadern Department of Neurosurgery, Germany

Wirksamkeit Medianes Gesamtüberleben, Monate (95% KI) Bevacizumab (n = 84) 9,2 (8,2 10,7) Bevacizumab + Irinotecan (n = 82) 8,7 (7,8 10,9) PFS, Monate (95% KI) PFS-6, % (97,5% KI) Ansprechrate, % (97,5% KI) CR PR Mediane Ansprechdauer, Monate (95% KI) 4,2 (2,9 5,8) 42,6 (29,6 55,5) 28,2 (18,5 40,3) 1,2 27,1 5,6 (3,0 5,75) 5,6 (4,4 6,2) 50,3 (36,8 63,9) 37,8 (26,5 50,8) 2,4 35,4 4,4 (4,17 ) Friedman HS et al. J Clin Oncol 2009; University Hospital Munich Großhadern Department of Neurosurgery, Germany

Wirksamkeit Medianes Gesamtüberleben, Monate (95% KI) Bevacizumab (n = 84) 9,2 (8,2 10,7) Bevacizumab + Irinotecan (n = 82) 8,7 (7,8 10,9) PFS, Monate (95% KI) PFS-6, % (97,5% KI) Ansprechrate, % (97,5% KI) CR PR Mediane Ansprechdauer, Monate (95% KI) 4,2 (2,9 5,8) 42,6 (29,6 55,5) 28,2 (18,5 40,3) 1,2 27,1 5,6 (3,0 5,75) 5,6 (4,4 6,2) 50,3 (36,8 63,9) 37,8 (26,5 50,8) 2,4 35,4 4,4 (4,17 ) Friedman HS et al. J Clin Oncol 2009; University Hospital Munich Großhadern Department of Neurosurgery, Germany

Wirksamkeit Medianes Gesamtüberleben, Monate (95% KI) Bevacizumab (n = 84) 9,2 (8,2 10,7) Bevacizumab + Irinotecan (n = 82) 8,7 (7,8 10,9) PFS, Monate (95% KI) PFS-6, % (97,5% KI) Ansprechrate, % (97,5% KI) CR PR Mediane Ansprechdauer, Monate (95% KI) 4,2 (2,9 5,8) 42,6 (29,6 55,5) 28,2 (18,5 40,3) 1,2 27,1 5,6 (3,0 5,75) 5,6 (4,4 6,2) 50,3 (36,8 63,9) 37,8 (26,5 50,8) 2,4 35,4 4,4 (4,17 ) Friedman HS et al. J Clin Oncol 2009; University Hospital Munich Großhadern Department of Neurosurgery, Germany

University Hospital Munich Großhadern Department of Neurosurgery, Germany

University Hospital Munich Großhadern Department of Neurosurgery, Germany

AVAGLIO A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy of Bevacizumab, Radiotherapy and Temozolomide (TMZ) Followed by Bevacizumab and TMZ, Versus Placebo Radiotherapy and TMZ Followed by Placebo and TMZ on Survival in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma University Hospital Munich Großhadern Department of Neurosurgery, Germany

University Hospital Munich Großhadern Department of Neurosurgery, Germany