Effects of recent changes in asbestos. on companies Christopher Diamantoukos, FCAS, MAAA



Similar documents
Solvency II overview

Directors & Officers (D&O) liability policy primer and claim modeling potential. Presenters. Purpose of D&O insurance

Emerging Liability Risks A Practical Accumulation Example

The Chubb Corporation 2002 Asbestos Review. Date of release 04/30/03 1

Predictive Modeling and Claims Analytics to Incorporate Leakage Analyses

Disaster recovery strategic planning: How achievable will it be?

The T&N UK Asbestos Trust and The T&N EL Trust

Closing the gap Wealth Management Survey

Greenlight Re. Rethinking Reinsurance

SUBJECT: MUNICIPAL MUTUAL INSURANCE SCHEME OF ARRANGEMENT UPDATE

Lease accounting update

Case 3:10-cv SRU Document 1 Filed 12/10/10 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT : : : : : : : : : : : : : : :

Mesothelioma incidence modeling and forecasting

2013 Casualty Loss Reserve Seminar

IFRS 10, 11 and 12 on consolidation and joint arrangements

How To Lower Tax Burden For More Companies

Earn-out arrangements in a business combination impact of the revised IFRS 3

Ms. Jennifer L. Biggs

Introduction to Grant Thornton s General Insurance Actuarial Services

Newsletter UK Tax Update 2009

Supreme Court delivers judgment in the Employers' Liability Trigger Litigation

Share Purchase Agreements Accounting rules for completion accounts

trends and audit considerations

Travelers Bond & Specialty Insurance

Cybersecurity. Considerations for the audit committee

Group Captive Insurance Programs for Property and Casualty Coverages

In Defense of Insured Contracts

IASB Educational Session Non-Life Claims Liability

Skeletons in the Cupboard - Latent claim developments in General Insurance, Why they have happened and Possible inferences for healthcare

Financial services regulatory compliance. Changing demands require the right perspective

Guide to Reviewing Contract Documentation

The Right Prescription? Should Your Company's Medical Benefits Be Insured Through a Captive Insurance Company?

Trends in European Casualty insurance

RenaissanceRe. Professional Indemnity Insurance

19/10/2012. How do you monitor. (...And why should you?) CAS Annual Meeting - Henry Jupe

In Re Liquidation of Integrity Insurance Company: Cutting Off the Long-Tail of IBNR Claims

Covering Disease costs NIHL and pre-action disclosure date. Part 36 offers in multi-defendant cases and quantum in mesothelioma claims

Emphasis: Proactive Management of Asbestos Liabilities

IT Governance. What is it and how to audit it. 21 April 2009

Persistence Of Trigger, Allocation Disputes

Construction Defects And 'The Space Between'

Pro-Tect Asset Protection

Actuarial services that enhance performance. Insurance PRECISE. PROVEN. PERFORMANCE.

Update from UK asbestos and deafness working parties Robert Brooks, Brian Gravelsons and Gabriela Macra

VERMONT DEPARTMENT OF BANKING, INSURANCE, SECURITIES, AND HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION

INGERSOLL RAND CO LTD

Reclassification of financial assets

Actuarial Roundtable Presented by Milliman

EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM TO THE COMPENSATION ACT 2006 (CONTRIBUTION FOR MESOTHELIOMA CLAIMS) REGULATIONS No.

A Pricing Model for Underinsured Motorist Coverage

Regulatory Process for Reviewing Hurricane Models and use in Florida Rate Filings

Appendix I: Select Federal Legislative. Proposals Addressing Compensation for Asbestos-Related Harms or Death

THE ANATOMY OF BETTER INTELLIGENCE

Emerging Insurance Issues. Jesse Laslovich, Chief Legal Counsel Mari Kindberg, CSI Rates Bureau Chief Greg Dahl, Deputy Insurance Commissioner

UK Healthcare Team RISK AND INSURANCE SOLUTIONS FOR THE HEALTHCARE INDUSTRY

EL Trigger - Consequences for Reinsurers

News from The Chubb Corporation

Cybersecurity and the AICPA Cybersecurity Attestation Project

Captive Reinsurance. An Innovative Approach to U.S. Employee Benefits

Commercial Casualty Insurance

The promise and pitfalls of cyber insurance January 2016

NEW YORK STATE WORKERS COMPENSATION BOARD ASSESSMENTS

US Asbestos Liability

RE: Disclosure Requirements for Short Duration Insurance Contracts

How To Understand And Understand The Principles Of Ifrs 2

scotland ACE Agreement 2: Advisory, Investigatory and other Services

INSURANCE CODE TITLE 10. PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE SUBTITLE C. AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE CHAPTER 1952

Title 24-A: MAINE INSURANCE CODE

A Synthesis of Asbestos Disclosures

Umbrella & Excess Liability - Understanding & Quantifying Price Movement

Reserving for loyalty rewards programs Part I

Best location for regional headquarters? Hong Kong vs Shanghai vs Singapore

Insurance Commission of Western Australia

February 1, Honorable Arlen Specter Chairman Committee on the Judiciary United States Senate Washington, DC Dear Mr.

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA 1987 SESSION CHAPTER 310 SENATE BILL 310

Advertising and sponsorship. Accounting for promotional costs in consumer products companies under IFRS

The Market for Lawyers Professional Liability Insurance for Large U.S. Firms*

Transcription:

Effects of recent changes in asbestos and environmental liability estimates on companies Christopher Diamantoukos, FCAS, MAAA Seminar on Reinsurance Casualty Actuarial Society May 6-7, 2010

Agenda Elements driving change Asbestos allocations Non-products asbestos Environmental effects Applications to future liabilities Page 1

Underlying causes of change from A.M. Best Dec 7, 2009 Special Report Asbestos elevated levels of annual incurred losses. Asbestos growing proportion of more serious cases such as mesothelioma. Environmental steady decline in incurred losses. Environmental mega losses have been settled. Page 2

Asbestos incurred losses where are they coming from? Primary companies are still incurring claims. Excess coverages and reinsurers are incurring ever-increasing share of total losses. Some new defendants identified in recent years have had significant asbestos claims reported and settled. Products asbestos losses driven by exposure from workers in several types of industries. A clinical i l study estimated t an average latency period of 35 to 40 years. Page 3

Asbestos incurred losses where are they coming from? (cont d) 8000 Employees in Thousands 7000 6000 5000 4000 3000 2000 1000 0 Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Dept Statistics for Construction industry Page 4

Asbestos incurred losses where are they coming from? (cont d) Nicholson Secondary Construction Manville 800 20000 700 18000 600 16000 14000 500 12000 400 10000 300 8000 200 6000 4000 100 2000 0 0 1967 1970 1973 1976 1979 1982 1985 1988 1991 1994 1997 2000 2003 2006 2009 2012 2015 2018 2021 2024 2027 2030 2033 2036 2039 2042 2045 2048 1 1 1 1 990 993 996 999 2002 2005 2008 2011 2014 2017 2020 2023 2026 2029 2032 2035 2038 2041 Deaths Deaths 2044 2047 Page 5

Asbestos incurred losses where are they coming from? (cont d) Combine date of first exposure or active workers in an industry, with Distribution that is Normal (or close to it) You end up with sum of Normal distributions which is Normal Page 6

Asbestos incurred losses where are they coming from? (cont d) Page 7

Asbestos incurred losses where are they coming from? (cont d) Page 8

Asbestos incurred losses where are they going? g It depends on: Which layers the insurer or reinsurer is involved. Which years the insurer or reinsurer is involved. The type of coverage. Page 9

Asbestos products coverage The volume of losses settled, paid and incurred is the most important element. Large claims, such as mesothelioma claims, will normally not create greater insured products coverage than the same amount of total loss from many claims. Page 10

Asbestos non-products losses Prior to 1986, premises coverage was referred to as general liability sublines (a) owners, landlords and tenants; (b) manufacturers and contractors. Some of these defendants have recently arrived on the scene: Latency period is an important part of the emergence. Asbestos is mined, used to create products, used in other products and is eventually used. Defendants enter at different points in this timeline. Some are not new: There have been successful reallocations of past asbestos claims from products to non-products. Involves potential increase to industry liabilities from past as well as future claims. Page 11

Asbestos non-products losses (cont d) How does coverage chart affect a company s non-products asbestos? It doesn t. Non-products asbestos losses are individual events by claimant: They are allocated across time. They do not aggregate like products. Expectation of losses in excess layer may be non-existent. Will affect pools or proportional reinsurance treaties ti that t include those written for protection of many smaller insurers. Page 12

Environmental liabilities and excess coverages The largest remediation sites exposed direct casualty excess of loss coverage and corresponding reinsurance. These losses contributed to insolvencies of some direct excess writers in the 1980s as well as Lloyds. Recent environmental losses are not of the same scale as those more than ten years ago. Expected average might be higher but expectation above significant excess threshold is much lower. Excess coverage and reinsurance of casualty excess coverage have seen incurred losses reduce to a trickle in some portfolios. Page 13

Asbestos and environmental comparisons Asbestos losses in the future are expected to remain with excess layers and reinsurers. Any asbestos increases in the future from non-products coverage should have little effect on excess layers and some effect of proportional p reinsurance of lower layers. Environmental should show an overall decrease, but excess layers and reinsurers should show a greater decrease. Page 14

Lessons for the future Latent claims, continual causation claims and mass torts will arise from time to time. Some of those already identified will start to affect more recent insurance coverages. Evidence of asbestos claims with a date of first exposure beyond 1986 and the introduction of an absolute exclusion clause. Litigation continues on other latent claims with ongoing products in use exposure. Analyses by exposure and coverage period and layer of loss, will still be needed Page 15

Ernst & Young Assurance Tax Transactions Advisory About Ernst & Young Ernst & Young is a global leader in assurance, tax, transaction and advisory services. Worldwide, our 144,000 people are united by our shared values and an unwavering commitment to quality. We make a difference by helping our people, our clients and our wider communities achieve their potential. Ernst & Young refers to the global organization of member firms of Ernst & Young Global Limited, each of which is a separate legal entity. Ernst & Young Global Limited, a UK company limited by guarantee, does not provide services to clients. For more information about our organization, please visit www.ey.com Ernst & Young is a leader in serving the global financial services marketplace Nearly 30,000 Ernst & Young financial services professionals around the world provide integrated assurance, tax, transaction and advisory services to our asset management, banking, capital markets and insurance clients. In the United States, Ernst & Young LLP is the only public accounting firm with a separate business unit dedicated to the financial services marketplace. Created in 2000, the New York City- centered Financial Services Office today includes more than 3,300 professionals in over 30 locations across the US, as well as in Bermuda, the Bahamas and the Cayman Islands. Ernst & Young professionals in our financial services practices worldwide align with key global industry groups, including Ernst & Young s Global Asset Management Center (based in London), Global Banking & Capital Markets Center and Global Insurance Center (both based in New York), which act as hubs for sharing industry-focused knowledge on current and emerging trends and regulations in order to help our clients address key issues. Our practitioners span many disciplines and provide a well-rounded understanding of business issues and challenges, as well as integrated services to our clients. With a global presence and industry-focused advice, Ernst & Young s financial services professionals provide high-quality assurance, tax, transaction and advisory services, including operations, risk and technology, to financial services companies worldwide. It s how Ernst & Young makes a difference. 2010 EYGM Limited All Rights Reserved. This publication contains information in summary form and is therefore intended for general guidance only. It is not intended to be a substitute for detailed research or the exercise of professional judgment. Neither EYGM Limited nor any other member of the global Ernst t&y Young organization can accept any responsibility for loss occasioned to any person acting or refraining from action as a result of any material in this publication. On any specific matter, reference should be made to the appropriate advisor. CSGcom number