Accountability and Disclosure Commission



Similar documents
COLORADO INDEPENDENT ETHICS COMMISSION S TRIAL BRIEF

CONSENT ORDER. THIS CAUSE came on for consideration as the result of an agreement between

CHAPTER 46 RULES OF THE BOARD OF EXAMINERS OF SHORTHAND REPORTERS

BEFORE THE COMMISSIONER OF INSURANCE

HP0868, LD 1187, item 1, 123rd Maine State Legislature An Act To Recoup Health Care Funds through the Maine False Claims Act

CALIFORNIA FALSE CLAIMS ACT GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION

Errors and Omissions Insurance. 1.0 Introduction and Definition

Case 4:08-cv RP-CFB Document 245 Filed 09/02/15 Page 1 of 10

REGULATORY SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT. THIS REGULATORY SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT (the Regulatory Settlement

BEFORE THE COMMISSIONER OF INSURANCE OF THE STATE OF KANSAS CONSENT ORDER

STATE OF MINNESOTA OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

CLINTON COUNTY BOARD OF REVISION RULES OF PROCEDURE

GOVERNMENT PROSECUTIONS AND QUI TAM ACTIONS

SB 588. Employment: nonpayment of wages: Labor Commissioner: judgment enforcement.

NO. ASSURANCE OF VOLUNTARY COMPLIANCE. COME NOW, THE STATE OF TEXAS, acting by and through Attorney General GREG

YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THIS SETTLEMENT

State of California - Department of Corporations

BID BOND CITY OF EAST POINT, GEORGIA

RULES OF THE TAX APPEAL COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI I

;-:-CV cj-0 I~ No PJ

BEFORE THE HEARING OFFICER OF THE TAXATION AND REVENUE DEPARTMENT OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO DECISION AND ORDER

AGREEMENT OF VOLUNTARY COMPLIANCE AS TO LYON FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC., d/b/a U.S. BANCORP BUSINESS EQUIPMENT FINANCE GROUP

Case 1:11-cv LGS Document 151 Filed 06/08/15 Page 1 of 7 : : : : :

TO: ALL PERSONS AND BUSINESSES WITH A VERIZON.NET ADDRESS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS PEORIA DIVISION

Sub. H.B. 9 * 126th General Assembly (As Reported by H. Civil and Commercial Law)

Representing Whistleblowers Nationwide

CAMPAIGN FINANCE AND BALLOT MEASURE GUIDE

INSTRUCTIONS FOR FILING A CONDOMINIUM / COOPERATIVE COMPLAINT

In re Weatherford International Securities Litigation c/o GCG P.O. Box Dublin, OH PROOF OF CLAIM FORM

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT. This Settlement Agreement (hereafter Agreement ) is entered into by

FINAL ORDER EFFECTIVE:

BEFORE THE COMMISSIONER OF INSURANCE OF THE STATE OF KANSAS ORDER TO CEASE AND DESIST

BEFORE THE INSURANCE COMMISSIONER OF THE STATE OF UTAH STIPULATION AND ORDER UTAH INSURANCE DEPARTMENT, Complainant,

FINAL ORDER EFFECTIVE:

FINAL ORDER EFFECTIVE:

WASHOE COUNTY. Dedicated To Excellence in Public Service STAFF REPORT BOARD MEETING DATE: April 28, 2015

PARTIAL SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

Case 3:11-cv RCJ-WGC Document 96 Filed 12/18/14 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Minnesota False Claims Act

991. Creation of division of administrative law Applicability; exemptions; attorney fees; court costs

TITLE 18 INSURANCE DELAWARE ADMINISTRATIVE CODE Consumer Rights. 901 Arbitration of Automobile and Homeowners' Insurance Claims

RULES OF THE GEORGIAN SECURITIES CENTRAL SECURITIES DEPOSITORY ON SETTLEMENT OF DISPUTES

Courtroom: 19 FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA New Orleans Division

CITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD[263]

Case3:12-cv CRB Document265 Filed07/20/15 Page2 of 12

SAN FRANCISCO ADMINISTRATIVE CODE CHAPTER 96: COORDINATION BETWEEN THE POLICE DEPARTMENT AND THE OFFICE OF CITIZEN COMPLAINTS

BEFORE THE MINNESOTA BOARD OF PHYSICAL THERAPY. IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between Curtis A. Johnson, P.T.

ASSEMBLY BILL No. 2036

NEW YORK CITY FALSE CLAIMS ACT Administrative Code through *

FINAL ORDER Effective:

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION TWO

In order to avoid the delay and expense of further proceedings and to promote the best

Case 2:14-cv JFC Document 43 Filed 07/16/15 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Case 8:13-cv GJH Document 71 Filed 12/02/14 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MARYLAND

THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES AIR RESOURCES DIVISION

13 LC ER. Senate Bill 202 By: Senators Unterman of the 45th, Mullis of the 53rd and Chance of the 16th A BILL TO BE ENTITLED AN ACT

Meetings of Public Bodies CHAPTER 13D OPEN MEETING LAW

CIVIL TRIAL RULES. of the COURTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, TEXAS. Table of Contents GENERAL MATTERS. Rule 1.10 Time Standards for the Disposition of Cases...

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY Office of Administrative Law Judges WASHINGTON, D.C

MINNESOTA FALSE CLAIMS ACT. Subdivision 1. Scope. --For purposes of this chapter, the terms in this section have the meanings given them.

FINAL ORDER EFFECTIVE:

2012 WI 48 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN. In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against Aaron J. Rollins, Attorney at Law:

SECRETARY OF HOUSING AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT. Division of Insurance, Petitioner v. Edna D. Duvall, Respondent Docket No. E

FINAL ORDER EFFECTIVE:

May 28, All Title Insurance Companies, Title Insurance Agencies, and Title Insurance Agents Licensed in Virginia

FINAL ORDER EFFECTIVE:

APPROVED Movant shall serve copies of this ORDER on

State of Nevada Law - A Day at the County Sheriff Office

Rights & Obligations under the Nebraska Workers Compensation Law

PUBLIC CHAPTER NO. 353

Buckeye Brainiacs Support Terms of Service

FINAL ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION ILLINOIS PROPERTY TAX APPEAL BOARD

CONTRACT FOR ASSESSMENT AND COLLECTION BETWEEN DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS AND THE TOWN OF ADDISON

Findings of Fact. 1. The Commissioner of Insurance has jurisdiction over this matter pursuant

MONTANA EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, CASCADE COUNTY. Appearing on behalf of the Named Plaintiff and the Class were attorneys Daniel P.

Milwaukee Bar Association Fee Arbitration

388 Blohm Ave. PO Box 388 Aromas CA (831) FAX (831) ADDENDUM NO. 1

FINAL JUDGMENT BY CONSENT

Key Provisions of Tennessee Senate Bill 200 Effective July 1, 2014, through July 1, 2016

NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION, PROPOSED PARTIAL SETTLEMENT, AND HEARING DATE FOR COURT APPROVAL

AIA Document A310 TM 2010

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF UTAH, CENTRAL DIVISION CONSENT DECREE. WHEREAS: Plaintiff, the United States of America, has

NEBRASKA ETHICS ADVISORY OPINION FOR LAWYERS No

SELECT SERVICES FLAT FEE REPRESENTATION AGREEMENT page 1 of 8

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION EIGHT

MINNESOTA FALSE CLAIMS ACT

51ST LEGISLATURE - STATE OF NEW MEXICO - FIRST SESSION, 2013

Case 1:14-cv FDS Document 64 Filed 01/29/16 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

Nebraska Tax Consequences for Real Property Owners

DOMESTIC RELATIONS CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER

Case Number: COLORADO COURT OF APPEALS 101 W. Colfax Ave., Suite 800 Denver CO,

FOR PROPERTY LOSS AND DAMAGE 1

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE FORM. Blitz v. AgFeed Industries, Inc. c/o Claims Administrator PO Box 3207 Portland, OR Tel:

STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & ECONOMIC GROWTH BOARD OF RESIDENTIAL BUILDERS AND MAINTENANCE & ALTERATION CONTRACTORS

PURCHASE AGREEMENT. Address:.

BEFORE THE COMMISSIONER OF INSURANCE OF THE STATE OF KANSAS

~[PR~] ORDER PRELIMINARILY APPROVING SETTLEMENT AND PROVIDING FOR CLASS NOTICE

Document A312 TM SURETY. (Name, legal status and principal place of business)

Transcription:

State of Nebraska Accountability and Disclosure Commission P.O. BOX 95086 Lincoln, Nebraska 68509 www.nadc.nebraska.gov 11th Floor, State Capitol Phone (402 471-2522 Fax (402 471-6599 Respondent: Doug Teaford Synopsis Case #14-15 Action Taken on October 16, 2015 The Respondent was a member of the Keith County Board. A complaint was filed on July 30, 2014 by Keith County resident Tom Kalkowski alleging that the Respondent: a had a potential conflict of interest and failed to make a written disclosure of the potential conflict in violation of 49-1499.03; and b used his public office for personal financial gain in violation of 49-14,101.01 of the NPADA. The allegations arose at a meeting of the Keith County Board sitting as the Board of Equalization. In a decision entered in May of 2014, the Nebraska Supreme Court ruled that "improvements" to land owned by Central Nebraska Public Power District which were being used for residential purposes are subject to taxation. On July 16, 2014 the Keith County Assessor presented the Board with a list of properties in Keith County which might be subject to taxation pursuant to the Supreme Court decision. The list included a tract of land on which the respondent held a long term lease and on which there was an "improvement" or house owned by the respondent. The Respondent voted "not to approve" adding the property on the list to the tax rolls. The parties entered into a settlement agreement by the terms of which the Commission could find a violation of 49-14,101.01(1 and assess a civil penalty of not more than $1,750.00. The allegation of a violation of 49-1499.03 would be dismissed. The Commission approved the SettlementAgreement, found a violation and assessed a civil penalty of $1,750.00 with eight Commissioners concurring, no Commissioners dissenting, and no Commissioners abstaining. Violation: Pursuant to the Settlement Agreement, the Commission found that the Respondent had used his public office for personal financial gain in violation section 49-14,101.01(1 of the NPADA. Civil Penalty: $1,750.00 Attorney for Commission: Attorney for Respondent: Neil Danberg Joshua Wendell, Ogallala The Salvation of the State is Watchfulness in the Citizen

Synopsis Prepared by: Frank Daley Executive Director Nebraska Accountability & Disclosure Commission P.O. Box 95086 Lincoln, NE 68509 402-471-2522

BEFORE THE NEBRASKA ACCOUNTABILITY AND DISCLOSURE COMMISSION In the Matter of Douglas Teaford Respondent CASE NO. 14-15 ORDER Now on this 16th day of October, 2015, this matter comes before the Nebraska Accountability and Disclosure Commission. Commissioners Conway, Enenbach, Gale, Loudon, Peetz, Schulz, von Gillern and Ziebarth are present with Commissioner Schulz presiding. The Respondent is not present. Neil Danberg appears on behalf of the Commission. The Commission notes the submission of a proposed Settlement Agreement. Whereupon, the Commission with eight (8 Commissioners concurring, no Commissioners dissenting, and no Commissioners abstaining, finds that the attached Settlement Agreement should be and hereby is approved and incorporated into this Order. Pursuant to that Agreement, the Commission finds that the Respondent has committed a violation of Nebraska Revised Statutes, Section 49-14,101.01(1, as more fully explained in the attached Settlement Agreement. The Commission imposes a civil penalty of $.1,750.00 Issued this 16th day ofoctober, 2015 Nebraska Accountability and Disclosure Commission Frank J. D Executiv Certificate of Service I hereby certify that a copy of this Order was sent by certified U.S. Mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested on this 16th day of October, 2016, to the following at the following address or addresses: Tom Kalkowski, 1205 Highland Drive, Ogallala, Nebraska 69153; Douglas Teaford, 320 East B Street, Ogallala, Nebraska 69153; and by regular U.S. Mail to his attorney, Josh Wendell, McQuillan and Wendell, PC, LLO, P.O. Box 478, Ogallala, Nebraska 69153. kjs&mjl Frank J. Daley, Jr. Executive Directo

BEFORE THE NEBRASKA ACCOUNTABILITY AND DISCLOSURE COMMISSION CASE No. 14-15 In the Matter of DOUGLAS TEAFORD SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT 1 Parties: The parties to this Settlement Agreement (hereinafter "Agreement" are the Nebraska Accountability and Disclosure Commission, hereafter referred to as the "Commission" and Douglas Teaford, hereinafter referred to as the "Respondent". 2 Jurisdiction: The Respondent acknowledges the jurisdiction of the Commission pursuant to the Nebraska Political Accountability and Disclosure Act ("NPADA". 3 Intention: The parties hereby agree that this Agreement shall constitute a waiver of a formal hearing on the alleged violation as described in Paragraphs 4 and 7 of this Agreement, thereby resolving the matter without further delay and expense to the parties. 4 The Alleged Violations: In its Notice of Preliminary Investigation, the Commission alleged Respondent violated the NPADA as follows: First Alleged Violation: Section 49-1499.03, which requires public officials to file a Potential Conflict of Interest Statement when facing a possible conflict of interest; and Second Alleged Violation: Section 49-14,101.01(1, which prohibits office-holders from using their public office for personal financial gain. 5 Stipulations and Findings: The Respondent and the Commission stipulate and agree that at the time of the alleged violation, the Respondent was a County Commissioner of Keith County, Nebraska, and, as such, he served on the Board of Equalization for Keith County. While serving as a member of the Board of Equalization, on or about July 16, 2014, he voted in favor of a motion which had the effect of not placing certain properties on the tax rolls. 6 Dismissal of First Violation as part of this Agreement: Under the terms of this Agreement, the Commission will dismiss the First Alleged Violation under Section 49-1499.03, as noted above in Paragraph 4 7 Second Alleged Violation and Finding: The Second Alleged Violation, as identified in Paragraph 4 of this Agreement was described in the Notice of Preliminary Investigation as follows: That Douglas Teaford, a County Commissioner and member of the Board of Equalization in Keith County, Nebraska, on or about July 16, 2014, used his official position as a member of the Keith County Board of

Equalization to obtain financial gain for himself, by voting not to tax a parcel of land in which he had a financial interest in violation of Section 49-14,101.01(1 of the Nebraska Revised Statutes." For his part, the Respondent states that it was not his intention to violate Nebraska law as alleged. Nonetheless, the Respondent agrees and stipulates that if this matter proceeded to a hearing, there is sufficient evidence from which the Commission could find that there has been a violation as alleged and that the Commission may enter an order in accordance with said finding, and that he would not contest such a finding. 8 Civil Penalty: The parties have agreed that, if the Commission elects to impose a civil penalty for the violation, as described in Paragraph 4 and 7 of this Agreement, the amount of the civil penalty imposed upon the Respondent will not exceed $1,750.00. 9 The NADC must approve this Agreement in order for it to be Effective: The parties agree that in order for this Agreement to become effective, the Commission must approve it and shall, if it approves the Settlement, enter an Order in accordance with the terms of this Agreement. 10 Effective Date of Agreement: This Agreement shall not be binding upon the parties until the date it is approved by the Commission and the Commission issues an order in accordance with the terms of this Agreement. The date upon which the Commission enters its Order approving this Agreement shall be deemed its effective date. If this Agreement is not approved in whole by the Commission, this Settlement Agreement shall be void and may not be used in this or any other proceeding. The parties acknowledge that this Settlement Agreement and any subsequent Order shall be announced at an open public meeting of the Commission and that the vote on such matters shall take place during the Closed Session portion of the meeting. The parties acknowledge that upon adoption, this Settlement Agreement, the Order and the Commission's file pertaining to this matter shall become open and public. 11 Right to Address the Commission: The Respondent and his attorney have a right to address the Commission on the matter of the amount, if any, of the civil penalty and approval of this Settlement Agreement. 12 Advice of Counsel: The Respondent acknowledges that he has had an opportunity to seek the advice of his attorney in connection with the terms of this agreement. Douglas Teaford, Respondent Date

ecutive Director/ and Disclosure Commission /0-ll-ti Date Approves as to Form, Josh Wendell Attorney for Douglas Teaford Date %(H -2o($