Statutes of Limitation: New Jersey



Similar documents
New Jersey Statute of Limitations Checklist Lauri A. Mazzuchetti, Kelley Drye & Warren LLP

Statutes of Limitation: Kentucky

Statutes of Limitation: Illinois

Connecticut Statute of Limitations Checklist

Illinois Statute of Limitations Checklist Timothy R. Lavender and Michael R. Dover, Kelley Drye & Warren LLP

COMMON MASSACHUSETTS STATUTES OF LIMITATIONS

Navigating the Statute of Limitations in Texas

STATUTES OF LIMITATIONS IN COLORADO

Case 2:08-cv LDD Document 17 Filed 02/05/09 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

ASSEMBLY BILL No. 597

HP0868, LD 1187, item 1, 123rd Maine State Legislature An Act To Recoup Health Care Funds through the Maine False Claims Act

Case: 2:04-cv JLG-NMK Doc #: 33 Filed: 06/13/05 Page: 1 of 7 PAGEID #: <pageid>

ASSEMBLY BILL No. 597

trial court and Court of Appeals found that the Plaintiff's case was barred by the statute of limitations.

ILLINOIS LAW MANUAL CHAPTER I CIVIL PROCEDURE. A statute of limitations is a statute establishing a time limit for suing in a civil case,

CALIFORNIA FALSE CLAIMS ACT GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION

ORDER GRANTING SUMMARY JUDGMENT. THIS MATTER comes on for consideration of DEFENDANT S MOTION FOR I. STATEMENT OF THE CASE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA : : : : ORDER AND MEMORANDUM O R D E R

A Bill Regular Session, 2015 SENATE BILL 830

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND. of police reports in bad faith. Plaintiff claims that Defendants acted willfully, wantonly and in

Minnesota False Claims Act

Case 4:06-cv Document 12 Filed in TXSD on 05/25/06 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

TITLE 2 - RULES OF PROCEDURE CHAPTER 2-2 CIVIL ACTIONS, LIMITATIONS AND LIABILITY CIVIL ACTIONS

Legal FAQ: Introduction to Patent Litigation

Representing Whistleblowers Nationwide

STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A Yvette Ford, Appellant, vs. Minneapolis Public Schools, Respondent.

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE TWENTIETH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT ST. CLAIR COUNTY, ILLINOIS NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

Case 2:14-cv DGC Document 38 Filed 08/25/14 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

What Trustees Should Know About Florida s New Attorneys Fee Statute. By David P. Hathaway and David J. Akins. Introduction

Title 28-A: LIQUORS. Chapter 100: MAINE LIQUOR LIABILITY ACT. Table of Contents Part 8. LIQUOR LIABILITY...

MINNESOTA FALSE CLAIMS ACT. Subdivision 1. Scope. --For purposes of this chapter, the terms in this section have the meanings given them.

to add a number of affirmative defenses, including an allegation that Henry s claim was barred

FALSE CLAIMS ACT STATUTORY LANGUAGE

NC General Statutes - Chapter 1 Article 3 1

In the Wake of Collapse: Approaches to Ponzi Scheme Litigation

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL TRIAL DIVISION

Case 4:14-cv Document 39 Filed in TXSD on 07/08/15 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION ORDER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Master File No. 3:10-cv CAB-DHB CLASS ACTION

Bill 34 The New Limitation Act: Significant Changes and Transition Issues Explained

Title XLV TORTS. Chapter 768 NEGLIGENCE. View Entire Chapter

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT. No Non-Argument Calendar. Docket No. 1:13-cv WSD.

LIMITATIONS. The Limitations Act. being

HARVEY KRUSE, P.C. BAD FAITH

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA MEMORANDUM. Bartle, J. December, 2012

Massachusetts Statute of Limitations Checklist

PARRY G. CAMERON, Senior Attorney

Colorado s Civil Access Pilot Project and the Changing Landscape of Business Litigation

COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

2015 IL App (3d) U. Order filed September 2, 2015 IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS THIRD DISTRICT A.D., 2015

NEW YORK CITY FALSE CLAIMS ACT Administrative Code through *

ERISA Causes of Action *

EXHIBIT A NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS SETTLEMENT

MINNESOTA FALSE CLAIMS ACT

51ST LEGISLATURE - STATE OF NEW MEXICO - FIRST SESSION, 2013

CASE 0:10-cv MJD-FLN Document 106 Filed 06/06/11 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

METHODIST HEALTH SYSTEM ADMINISTRATIVE TITLE: DETECTING FRAUD AND ABUSE AND AN OVERVIEW OF THE FEDERAL AND STATE FALSE CLAIMS ACTS

Province of Alberta LIMITATIONS ACT. Revised Statutes of Alberta 2000 Chapter L-12. Current as of December 17, Office Consolidation

(a) The title of this section and is and may be cited as the Tennessee Medicaid False Claims Act.

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

HB Introduced by Representative Patterson AN ACT

DISCOVERY IN BAD FAITH CASES

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION EIGHT

2015 IL App (1st) U. No IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIRST DISTRICT

The two sides disagree on how much money, if any, could have been awarded if Plaintiffs, on behalf of the class, were to prevail at trial.

BILL ANALYSIS. Senate Research Center C.S.S.B By: Wentworth Jurisprudence 4/5/2007 Committee Report (Substituted)

SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON, COUNTY OF KING THIS NOTICE MAY AFFECT YOUR RIGHTS PLEASE READ IT CAREFULLY

Defense of State Employees: LIABILITY AND LAWSUITS. UNCW Office of General Counsel January 2010

2015 IL App (1st) U. No IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT

Drafting and Issuing Subpoenas: New Jersey

2016 IL App (1st) U. SIXTH DIVISION June 17, No IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT

INDIANA FALSE CLAIMS AND WHISTLEBLOWER PROTECTION ACT. IC Chapter 5.5. False Claims and Whistleblower Protection

GOVERNMENT PROSECUTIONS AND QUI TAM ACTIONS

A Jailhouse Lawyer s Manual

Tip of the Month June 2012 Statutes of Limitation, Statutes of Repose and Notice Requirements At a Glance

THE THREAT OF BAD FAITH LITIGATION ETHICAL HANDLING OF CLAIMS AND GOOD FAITH SETTLEMENT PRACTICES. By Craig R. White

AVOIDANCE OF TAX MALPRACTICE. By: Robert E. Forrest. Whether one is a general practitioner or seeking to specialize in tax practice, it is well to

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN

13 Summary of California Law (10th), Equity

The Solution for General Partnership Liability Coverage Part

Glenn Berman, a/a/o Osiris Torres, and Deepika Bajaj, a/a/o Osiris Torres, Plaintiffs, against. Country-Wide Insurance Company, Defendant.

BILL ANALYSIS. C.S.S.B By: Wentworth Civil Practices Committee Report (Substituted) BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Case 1:04-cv RBK-AMD Document 540 Filed 08/21/2007 Page 1 of 7

NOT ACTUAL PROTECTION: ACTUAL INNOCENCE STANDARD FOR CRIMINAL DEFENSE ATTORNEYS IN CALIFORNIA DOES NOT ELIMINATE ACTUAL LAWSUITS AND ACTUAL PAYMENTS

Reports or Connecticut Appellate Reports, the

Texas Medicaid Fraud Prevention Act

Henkel Corp v. Hartford Accident

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE December 02, 2014 Session

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY CAMDEN VICINAGE

AN ACT IN THE COUNCIL OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Transcription:

View the online version at http://us.practicallaw.com/9-501-2932 Statutes of Limitation: New Jersey LAURI A. MAZZUCHETTI AND TARA J. MARCIANO, KELLEY DRYE & WARREN LLP, WITH PRACTICAL LAW LITIGATION A Q&A guide to the statutes of limitation in New Jersey for several commercial claims. Answers to questions can be compared across a number of jurisdictions (see Statutes of Limitation: State Q&A Tool (http://us.practicallaw.com/1-204-8071)). ACCOUNT STATED 1. What is the statute of limitations for an account stated claim in The statute of limitations is six years (N.J. Stat. Ann. 2A:14-1; Pagano v. United Jersey Bank, 648 A.2d 269, 272 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1994)). The limitations period starts to run on the date the plaintiff demands payment and the demand is refused (Keil v. Nat'l Westminster Bank, Inc., 710 A.2d 563, 571 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1998); Pagano, 648 A.2d at 272). ANTITRUST 2. What is the statute of limitations for an antitrust claim in The statute of limitations is four years (N.J. Stat. Ann. 56:9-14). The limitations period starts to run on the date the cause of action arose (N.J. Stat. Ann. 56:9-14). If the cause of action is based on conspiracy in violation of the New Jersey Antitrust Act, the statute of limitations starts to run within four years after the plaintiff discovered, or should have discovered the facts relied on for proof of the conspiracy (N.J. Stat. Ann. 56:9-14). A cause of action for a continuing violation is deemed to arise at any time during the period of the violation (N.J. Stat. Ann. 56:9-14). For more New Jersey antitrust information see Special Rules and Exceptions: Pending or Recently Terminated Government Lawsuit. BREACH OF CONTRACT 3. What is the statute of limitations for a breach of contract Six years for non-sales contracts (N.J. Stat. Ann. 2A:14-1). Four years for contracts for the sale of goods under the Uniform Commercial Code (N.J. Stat. Ann. 12A:2-725(1)). For a non-sales contract action, on the date that the right to institute and maintain a suit first arose. In continuous or installment contracts, the cause of action arises for each periodic breach that occurs. (Nat'l Util. Serv., Inc. v. Cambridge-Lee Indus., Inc., 199 Fed. Appx. 139, 142 (3d Cir. 2006).) For a sales contract action, when either the breach or anticipatory breach occurs (N.J. Stat. Ann. 12A:2-725(2); Am. Cyanamid Co. v. Miss. Chem. Corp., 817 F.2d 91, 93 (11th Cir. 1987)). Parties to a sales contract may reduce the limitations period, but the limitations period must be at least one year, and the parties may not extend it beyond the four-year statutory limit (N.J. Stat. Ann. 12A:2-725(1)). The discovery rule does not toll sales contract causes of action because these actions accrue when the breach occurs, regardless of the aggrieved party's lack of knowledge of the breach (N.J. Stat. Ann. 12A:2-725(2)).

BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY 4. What is the statute of limitations for a breach of fiduciary duty The statute of limitations is: Usually six years for a breach of fiduciary duty that causes purely economic loss and is controlled by the substantive law governing the relationship (Balliet v. Fennell, 845 A.2d 168, 172 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 2004)). Two years for a breach of fiduciary duty harming one's physical or emotional well-being (Balliet, 845 A.2d at 171). When the plaintiff has actual or constructive knowledge for a claim of breach of fiduciary duty causing purely economic loss (Fleming Cos. v. Thriftway Medford Lakes, Inc., 913 F. Supp. 837, 846 (D.N.J. 1995)). A plaintiff has actual or constructive knowledge when he learns, or reasonably should learn, of the existence of facts forming the basis of a cause of action (Fleming, 913 F.Supp. at 846). In an uncertain manner for a claim of breach of fiduciary duty harming one's physical or emotional well-being, as there are no cases directly addressing the issue. However, causes of action under Section 2A:14-2 of the New Jersey Statutes usually accrue when the injured party discovers or should have discovered that he may have a basis for an actionable claim (Burd v. N.J. Tel. Co., 386 A.2d 1310, 1314-15 (N.J. 1978)). The basis for an actionable claim is defined as the material facts of the case (Burd, 386 A.2d at 1315). BREACH OF WARRANTY 5. What is the statute of limitations for a breach of warranty The statute of limitations is four years (N.J. Stat. Ann. 12A:2-725(1)). The limitations period starts to run when tender of delivery is made (Comm'rs of Fire Dist. No. 9, Iselin, Woodbridge, N.J. v. American La France, 424 A.2d 441, 444 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1980); N.J. Stat. Ann. 12A:2-725(2)). If the warranty explicitly extends to future performance of the goods, the four-year limitations period does not begin to run until the breach was or should have been discovered by plaintiff, provided the breach arises within the warranty period (Comm'rs of Fire Dist. No. 9., 424 A.2d at 444; N.J. Stat. Ann. 12A:2-725(2)). For more information on breach of warranty, see Special Rules and Exceptions: Warranty. CONSUMER PROTECTION STATUTES 6. What is the statute of limitations for a consumer protection The statute of limitation is six years for claims under the New Jersey Consumer Fraud Act (Kennedy v. Axa Equitable Life Ins., Co., Civil No.06-6082 (RBK), 2007 WL 2688881, at *2 (D.N.J. Sep. 11, 2007)). The limitations period starts to run when the plaintiff suffers actual damage and discovers, or through reasonable diligence should discover, the facts essential to his claim (Kominsky v. C.B. Planning Servs. Corp, 2010 WL 3516808, at *4 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. Sep. 9, 2010)). CONVERSION 7. What is the statute of limitations for a conversion claim in Six years for claims involving conversion of chattel (N.J. Stat. Ann. 2A:14-1; Weiss v. Stelling, 130 N.J.L. 235, 237 (N.J. 1943)). Three years for a claim involving conversion of a negotiable instrument (N.J. Stat. Ann. 12A:3-118(g); N.J. Lawyers' Fund for Client Prot. v. Pace, 892 A.2d 661, 662 (N.J. 2006)). When the chattel is first tortiously taken for a claim involving chattel (Weiss, 130 N.J.L. at 237); and When the check is negotiated for a claim involving a negotiable instrument (N.J. Lawyers' Fund for Client Prot., 892 A.2d at 661). EMPLOYMENT MATTERS 8. What is the statute of limitations for employment matters in One year for claims filed under the Conscientious Employee Protection Act (N.J. Stat. Ann. 34:19-5). Two years for petitions filed under the Worker's Compensation Act (N.J. Stat. Ann. 34:15-41 and 34:15-51). Under the Law Against Discrimination: 180 days for administrative claims (N.J. Stat. Ann. 10:5-18). Two years for civil cases filed in the Superior Court (Montells v. Haynes, 627 A.2d 654, 655 (N.J. 1993)). For a claim filed under the Conscientious Employee Protection Act, where there is a continued pattern of retaliatory conduct by the employer, the one-year statute of limitations accrues from the last retaliatory act (Matthews v. N.J. Inst. of Tech., Civil Action No. 09-2840 (JEI/JS), 2011 WL 741230, at *4 n.13 (D.N.J. Feb. 24, 2011)). 2

For a claim filed under the Worker's Compensation Act, the statute of limitations accrues on the date of injury (N.J. Stat. Ann. 34:15-51; Witty v. Fortunoff, 669 A.2d 244, 246 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1996)). If the employer and the claimant make a compensation agreement, the statute of limitations accrues two years after the employer fails to make payment under the agreement; or, if the employer pays part compensation, then within two years after the last payment (N.J. Stat. Ann. 34:15-51; Witty, 669 A.2d at 246). For a claim filed under the Law Against Discrimination, for discrete retaliatory or discriminatory acts, the statute of limitations accrues on the day the act occurs (Alexander v. Seton Hall Univ., 8 A.3d 198, 203 (N.J. 2010)). For a series of separate acts constituting a single unlawful employment practice, the statute of limitations accrues on the date of the last component act (Alexander, 8 A.3d at 203). ENFORCEMENT OF JUDGMENTS 9. What is the statute of limitations for enforcing a judgment in The statute of limitations is 20 years for New Jersey judgments (N.J. Stat. Ann. 2A:14-5; Giordano v. Wolcott, 134 A.2d 593, 594 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1957)). For foreign judgments, the statute of limitations is the shorter of 20 years or the length of time to enforce the judgment in the foreign jurisdiction (N.J. Stat. Ann. 2A:14-5). The statute of limitations is 20 years for an execution concerning real estate, goods and chattel (N.J. Stat. Ann. 2A:17-3). The limitations period starts to run on the entry of judgment in the district court for New Jersey judgments (N.J. Stat. Ann. 2A:14-5; Giordano, 134 A.2d at 595). The statute of limitations accrues for executions on the execution's entry (N.J. Stat. Ann. 2A:17-3). FRAUD 10. What is the statute of limitations for a fraud claim in your jurisdiction? The statute of limitations is six years for fraud (N.J. Stat. Ann. 2A:14-1). The limitations period starts to run on the date of the act or omission that gives rise to the fraud claim, or the date on which the act or omission reasonably should have been discovered (Southern Cross Overseas Agencies, Inc. v. Wah Kwong Shipping Group Ltd., 181 F.3d 410, 425 (3d Cir. 1999)). FRAUDULENT CONCEALMENT 11. What is the statute of limitations for a fraudulent concealment The statute of limitations is two years for the tort of fraudulent concealment (Avagnano-Pirozzi v. Chinchar, 2010 WL 4025881, at *6 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. Aug. 12, 2010)). The limitations period starts to run on the date the plaintiff discovers the actions alleged to form the basis of the fraudulent concealment claim (see Avagnano-Pirozzi, 2010 WL 4025881 at *6). Courts have also found the statute of limitations to accrue when the economic harm caused by defendant's fraudulent concealment has ended (see Viviano v. CBS, Inc., 597 A.2d 543, 551 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1991)) (statute of limitations accrues after settlement of legal claim delayed by fraudulent concealment). INSURANCE BAD FAITH 12. What is the statute of limitations for an insurance bad faith Absent a provision in the insurance policy or an express statute to the contrary, the statute of limitations applicable to actions on an insurance policy is six years (Gahnney v. State Farm Ins. Co., 56 F. Supp. 2d 491, 495 (D.N.J. 1999)). The limitations period may be shortened by the insurance policy and a one-year period is enforceable (Gahnney, 56 F. Supp. 2d at 495). The limitations period starts to run on the date of the incident, but is tolled from the time the insured gives notice until the insurer formally declines liability (Gahnney, 56 F. Supp. 2d at 495-96). For more information on insurance bad faith claims, see Practice Note, Insurance Bad Faith Law (http://us.practicallaw.com/4-505-9149). NEGLIGENCE 13. What is the statute of limitations for a negligence claim in Two years for personal injury claims generally (N.J. Stat. Ann. 2A:14-2(a)). Six years for property claims (N.J. Stat. Ann. 2A:14-1). The limitations period starts to run either: On the date of the act or omission giving rise to the claim. On the date the injured party discovers, or reasonably should have discovered that he may have a basis for an actionable claim. (Hardwicke v. American Boychoir Sch., 902 A.2d 900, 925 (N.J. 2006).) PRODUCTS LIABILITY 14. What is the statute of limitations for a products liability The statute of limitations is two years against product manufacturers and sellers under the New Jersey Products Liability Act (Dziewiecki v. Bakula, 853 A.2d 234, 237 (N.J. 2004)). 3

The limitations period starts to run on the date the injured party discovers, or reasonably should have discovered, the basis for an actionable claim (Lapka v. Porter Hayden Co., 745 A.2d 525, 529 (N.J. 2000)). For more information on products liability time limitations, see Special Rules and Exceptions: Products Liability Statute of Repose. SHAREHOLDER DERIVATIVE SUITS 4 15. What is the statute of limitations for a shareholder derivative suit in No statute of limitations applies, as these actions sound in equity. However, laches may be used as a defense if the stockholder with full knowledge of the facts has deferred an unreasonable length of time in bringing action (Hill Dredging Corp. v. Risley, 114 A.2d 697, 713 (N.J. 1955)). New Jersey has no statute of limitations applicable to shareholder derivative suits. THIRD-PARTY CONTRIBUTION 16. What is the statute of limitations for a third-party contribution In practice, the applicable statute of limitations is determined by the underlying claim on which the contribution claim is brought. The limitations period starts to run when the plaintiff recovers a judgment against the defendant. Under the entire controversy doctrine, if those claims are known, they should be asserted in the original action. (Schreck v. Wal-Mart Stores, Civil Action No. 08-CV-05729 (DMC), 2010 WL 551435 at *6 (D.N.J. Feb. 16, 2010).) TORTIOUS INTERFERENCE WITH CONTRACT RIGHTS 17. What is the statute of limitations for a claim of tortious interference with contract rights or a business relationship in The statute of limitations is six years for claims of tortious interference with a contract (In re Bernheim Litig., 290 B.R. 249, 258 (D.N.J. 2003)). The limitations period starts to run when the plaintiff discovers, or reasonably should have discovered, that he may have a basis for an actionable claim (In re Bernheim Litigation, 290 B.R. at 260). TRADE SECRET MISAPPROPRIATION 18. What is the statute of limitations for a trade secret misappropriation The statute of limitations is six years (N.J. Stat. Ann. 2A:14-1). The limitations period starts to run when the plaintiff knew or should have known of the injury giving rise to his claim (Blystra v. Fiber Tech Group, Inc., 407 F. Supp. 2d 636, 644 (D.N.J. 2005)). TRADEMARK INFRINGEMENT 19. What is the statute of limitations for a trademark infringement The New Jersey Trademark Act does not contain a statute of limitations section. Instead, laches governs the timeliness of trademark claims under both the Lanham Trademark Act and the New Jersey Trademark Act (Pharmacia Corp. v. Alcon Labs., Inc., 201 F. Supp. 2d 335, 382 (D.N.J. 2002)). Courts evaluate a laches defense by considering the plaintiff's actual or constructive knowledge of infringement and any subsequent delay in seeking relief (Pharmacia, 201 F. Supp. 2d at 383). A plaintiff's inexcusable delay may result in denial of a preliminary injunction (Pharmacia, 201 F. Supp. 2d at 382-383). The New Jersey Trademark Act does not contain a statute of limitations section. UNFAIR COMPETITION 20. What is the statute of limitations for an unfair competition The statute of limitations is six years for unfair competition claims under the common law and Section 56:4-1 of New Jersey's unfair competition statute (Kelly v. Estate of Arnone ex rel. Ahern, Civil Action No. 08-6046 (SDW), 2009 WL 2392108, at *7 (D.N.J. Aug. 3, 2009)). New Jersey case law does not specifically discuss the accrual date for an unfair competition cause of action. However, the limitations period starts to run likely on the date of the act giving rise to the unfair competition claim (Kelly, 2009 WL 2392108 at *7). UNJUST ENRICHMENT 21. What is the statute of limitations for an unjust enrichment The statute of limitations is six years (Jacobson v. Celgene Corp., Civil Case No. 09-4329 (FSH)(PS), 2010 WL 1492869, at *3 (D.N.J. Apr. 14, 2010)). The limitations period starts to run typically when the plaintiff last rendered services to the defendant (Jacobson, 2010 WL 1492869 at *4). The unjust enrichment statute of limitations may be tolled by the

discovery rule (Component Hardware Group, Inc. v. Trine Rolled Moulding Corp., Civil Action No. 05-891 (MLC), 2007 WL 2177667, at *8 (D.N.J. Jul. 27, 2007)). Therefore, the cause of action does not accrue until the injured party discovers, or reasonably should have discovered, facts that form the basis of a cause of action (Component, 2007 WL 2177667 at *8). WRONGFUL DEATH & SURVIVAL 22. What is the statute of limitations for a wrongful death and survival The statute of limitations is two years for wrongful death claims (N.J. Stat. Ann. 2A:31-3; Presslaff v. Robins, 403 A.2d 939, 940 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1979)). New Jersey has no statute of limitations for a wrongful death action if the death resulted from murder, aggravated manslaughter or manslaughter for which the defendant has been convicted, found not guilty by reason of insanity or adjudicated delinquent (N.J. Stat. Ann. 2A:31-3). The statute of limitations is two years for survival actions (Thomas v. Correctional Med. Servs., Inc., Civil Action No. 1:04-cv-3358 (NLH), 2009 WL 737105, at *3 (D.N.J. Mar. 17, 2009)). The limitations period starts to run on the date of the decedent's death (N.J. Stat. Ann. 2A:31-3). The discovery rule does not apply to wrongful death causes of action (Presslaff, 403 A.2d at 941-942). The limitations period for a survival claim accrues on the date of the alleged improper acts or omissions, not on the date of the decedent's death (Kisselbach v. County of Camden, 638 A.2d 1383, 1386 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1994)). OTHER COMMERCIAL CAUSES OF ACTION 23. Please describe any other statutes of limitations for commercial causes of action in your jurisdiction of which practitioners should be aware. There are no other statutes of limitations for commercial causes of action in New Jersey. SPECIAL RULES AND EXCEPTIONS 24. Please list any special rules and exceptions that may toll or otherwise affect any of the statutes of limitations in the previous questions. New Jersey has special rules and exceptions that may toll or otherwise affect the statutes of limitations described above. Depending on the cause of action and facts of the case, one or more of the following rules may affect the running of the statute of limitations. DISCOVERY RULE Generally, the statute of limitations begins to run from the time of the accrual of the action (Prudential Ins. Co. of Am. v. U.S. Gypsum Co., 828 F. Supp. 287, 297-298 (D.N.J. 1993)). However, in the interests of equity, New Jersey has adopted the discovery rule (Prudential, 828 F. Supp. at 298). The discovery rule delays the accrual of an action until the plaintiff discovers, or by exercise of reasonable diligence and intelligence should have discovered, facts that form the basis of a cause of action or provide a basis for an actionable claim (Henry v. N.J. Dep't of Human Servs., 9 A.3d 882, 892 (N.J. 2010)). The discovery rule applies to various causes of action in New Jersey, including fraud, negligence and New Jersey Consumer Fraud Act actions. FRAUDULENT CONCEALMENT RULE New Jersey has also adopted the doctrine of fraudulent concealment, which tolls the statute of limitations to prevent wrongdoers from benefiting by fraudulently concealing a cause of action until the statute of limitations has run (Prudential Ins. Co. of Am. v. U.S. Gypsum Co., 828 F. Supp. 287, 300 (D.N.J. 1993)). The doctrine tolls the running of the statute until the plaintiff discovers the cause of action or discovers facts that reasonably put him on notice of it (Prudential, 828 F. Supp. at 300). For example, if a plaintiff alleges fraud and the doctrine applies, the statute of limitations accrues on the date the fraud was or reasonably should have been discovered by the plaintiff (Bauer v. Bowen, 164 A.2d 357, 361 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1960)). EQUITABLE TOLLING Equitable estoppel may prevent a defendant from asserting the statute of limitations as a defense under certain circumstances. Equitable estoppel may apply: When a defendant's actions directly impact the plaintiff's decision on whether to file suit, for example, when a defendant has lulled a plaintiff into a false sense of security by representing that a claim will be amicably settled without litigation. When, based on the defendant's misrepresentations or failures to adhere to a legal duty to disclose, the plaintiff relied on the defendant's actions in not filing suit earlier. (Prudential Ins. Co. of Am. v. U.S. Gypsum Co., 828 F. Supp. 287, 303 (D.N.J. 1993).) CLASS ACTION TOLLING When a class action complaint is filed, it tolls the statute of limitations for all purported class members who intervene until class certification is denied (Thomas v. Correctional Med. Servs., Inc., Civil Action No. 1:04-cv-3358 (NLH), 2009 WL 737105 at *4 (D.N.J. Mar. 17, 2009)). The statute of limitations is not tolled if the plaintiff chooses to file an independent action before the class certification issue is determined (Thomas, 2009 WL 737105 at *4). PENDING OR RECENTLY TERMINATED GOVERNMENT LAWSUIT State civil or criminal New Jersey Antitrust Act actions suspend the statute of limitations for all private rights of action under the Antitrust Act during the pendency of the state action, plus one year (N.J. Stat. Ann. 56:9-15). WARRANTY If a breach of warranty action on a sales contract is commenced within four years after the breach, but is terminated in a way that leaves available a remedy by another action for the same breach, a second action may be started after the expiration of the initial limitations period. The second action must start within six months after the termination of the first action, unless the termination resulted from either: Voluntary discontinuance. Dismissal for failure or neglect to prosecute. (N.J. Stat. Ann. 12A:2-725(3).) 5

DEFENDANT'S ABSENCE FROM THE STATE The personal injury statute of limitations may be equitably tolled during the pendency of an action brought in a court that lacked personal jurisdiction over the defendant (Jaworowski v. Ciasulli, 490 F.3d 331, 336 (3d Cir. 2007)). Under New Jersey statutory law, the statute of limitations for certain claims does not accrue during the period that a defendant does not reside in New Jersey, if either: The defendant is not a New Jersey resident when the cause of action accrues. The defendant leaves New Jersey after the statute of limitations accrues, but before the statute of limitations expires. (N.J. Stat. Ann. 2A:14-22(a).) The defendant's absence affects the accrual date of various causes of action, including, but not limited to: Personal injury actions. Non-sales contract actions. Real property construction and improvement actions. Civil actions brought by the state. Libel and slander actions. (N.J. Stat. Ann. 2A:14-22(a)). EXTENSION OWING TO REVERSAL OR JUDGMENT AGAINST THE PLAINTIFF In certain actions, a plaintiff may start a new action within one year after the reversal or the judgment against him if: The judgment was awarded to the plaintiff and reversed on appeal. The judgment was given against the plaintiff following a motion for relief from a judgment in the plaintiff's favor. (N.J. Stat. Ann. 2A:14-28). This rule applies to various New Jersey causes of action, including, but not limited to: Personal injury actions. Non-sales contract actions. Real property construction and improvement actions. Civil actions brought by the state. Libel and slander actions. (N.J. Stat. Ann. 2A:14-28). However, this rule does not apply to breach of sales contract actions under New Jersey's Uniform Commercial Code (N.J. Stat. Ann. 2A:14-28). PLAINTIFF'S DISABILITIES The running of the statute of limitations may be tolled when the cause of action accrues if the plaintiff is under 21 years of age or has a mental disability that prevents him from understanding his legal rights or instituting a legal action. The statute of limitations accrues once the plaintiff reaches 21 or has the mental capacity to pursue his legal rights. (N.J. Stat. Ann. 2A:14-21). PRODUCTS LIABILITY STATUTE OF REPOSE Generally, a products liability statute of repose bars a plaintiff from starting a strict products liability action a certain number of years after the product's first sale, even if the plaintiff started the action before the statute of limitations expired on his products liability claim. New Jersey has not adopted a products liability statute of repose (Gantes v. Kason Corp., 679 A.2d 106, 112 (N.J. 1996)). By contrast, no action against a person performing or furnishing a real property survey under a contract, for any purpose other than real property improvement, may be started more than ten years after the survey (N.J. Stat. Ann. 2A:14-1.3). ABOUT PRACTICAL LAW Practical Law provides legal know-how that gives lawyers a better starting point. Our expert team of attorney editors creates and maintains thousands of up-to-date, practical resources across all major practice areas. We go beyond primary law and traditional legal research to give you the resources needed to practice more efficiently, improve client service and add more value. If you are not currently a subscriber, we invite you to take a trial of our online services at practicallaw.com. For more information or to schedule training, call 888.529.6397 or e-mail training.practicallaw@thomsonreuters.com. 04-15 6 Use of Practical Law websites and services is subject to the Terms of Use (http://us.practicallaw.com/2-383-6690) and Privacy Policy (http://us.practicallaw.com/8-383-6692).