IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO



Similar documents
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

GUIDELINES FOR USE OF THE MODEL AGREEMENT REGARDING DISCOVERY OF ELECTRONICALLY STORED INFORMATION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Case 2:14-cv KHV-JPO Document 12 Filed 07/10/14 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS

Reduce Cost and Risk during Discovery E-DISCOVERY GLOSSARY

electronic discovery requests

Discussion of Electronic Discovery at Rule 26(f) Conferences: A Guide for Practitioners

E-Discovery Basics For the RIM Professional. Learning Objectives 5/18/2015. What is Electronic Discovery?

What Am I Looking At? Andy Kass

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

DEFAULT STANDARD FOR DISCOVERY, INCLUDING DISCOVERY OF ELECTRONICALLY STORED INFORMATION {"ESI")

INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE PRODUCTION OF ELECTRONICALLY STORED INFORMATION (ESI)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON. Pursuant to the Court s order dated May 4, 2015 (Dkt # 110),

Xact Data Discovery. Xact Data Discovery. Xact Data Discovery. Xact Data Discovery. ediscovery for DUMMIES LAWYERS. MDLA TTS August 23, 2013

Suggested Protocol for Discovery of Electronically Stored Information ( ESI )

E-Discovery in Michigan. Presented by Angela Boufford

CASE NO. 279 CIVIL ACTION APPLICABLE TO ALL CASES CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER NO.5

ediscovery: The New Information Management Battleground Developments in the Law and Best Practices

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DIVISION. v. Case No. [MODEL] ORDER REGARDING E-DISCOVERY IN PATENT CASES

Best Practices Page 1

for Insurance Claims Professionals

AN EDISCOVERY RESOURCE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA CHARLESTON DIVISION

U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. Data Delivery Standards

Litigation Support. Learn How to Talk the Talk. solutions. Document management

FEDERAL PRACTICE. In some jurisdictions, understanding the December 1, 2006 Amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure is only the first step.

INDEX. General Capabilities Capabilities...3. Unicode Compliance...3. Archive Extraction...4. Password Cracking...3

REALITY BYTES: A NEW ERA OF ELECTRONIC DISCOVERY

E-Discovery Technology Considerations

DISCOVERY OF ELECTRONICALLY-STORED INFORMATION IN STATE COURT: WHAT TO DO WHEN YOUR COURT S RULES DON T HELP

PROPOSED ELECTRONIC DATA DISCOVERY GUIDELINES FOR THE MARYLAND BUSINESS AND TECHONOLOGY CASE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM JUDGES


Are you ready for more efficient and effective ways to manage discovery?

ediscovery 101 Myth Busting October 29, 2009 Olivia Gerroll ediscovery Solutions Group Director

E-DISCOVERY IN FEDERAL COURT: SIX CHANGES YOU SHOULD MAKE TO YOUR PRACTICE IN THE DISCOVERY PHASE OF THE CASE By Kary Pratt

The Top Ten List (and one) of Changes to the Federal Rules

Five Steps to Ensure a Technically Accurate Document Production

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT. DISTRICT OF NEVADA NO. 2:13-cv APG-PAL SPECIAL MASTER DANIEL B. GARRIE E-DISCOVERY SUMMARY AND ORDER

Electronic documents questionnaire

E-Discovery Best Practices

Article originally appeared in the Fall 2011 issue of The Professional Engineer

ELECTRONIC DISCOVERY. Dawn M. Curry

Electronic Discovery

COURT OF QUEEN S BENCH OF MANITOBA PRACTICE DIRECTION GUIDELINES REGARDING DISCOVERY OF ELECTRONIC DOCUMENTS

E-DISCOVERY GUIDELINES. Former Reference: Practice Directive #6 issued September 1, 2009

Stu Van Dusen Marketing Manager, Lexbe LC. September 18, 2014

ESI DEMYSTIFIED. Streamlining the E-Discovery Process Through Internal Processes and Controls. Melinda Burrows Bruce Cosgrove*

Proactive Data Management for ediscovery

Introduction Thanks Survey of attendees Questions at the end

Case4:12-cv KAW Document2-1 Filed06/25/12 Page1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, OAKLAND DIVISION

Document Storage Tips: Inside the Vault

Preservation and Production of Electronic Records

[DESCRIPTION OF CLAIM, INCLUDING RELEVANT ACTORS, EVENTS, DATES, LOCATIONS, PRODUCTS, ETC.]

E-Discovery Tip Sheet

Hong Kong High Court Procedure E-Discovery: Practice Direction Effective September 1, 2014

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ALASKA ORDER NO Pretrial Conferences; Scheduling; Management.

Ten practical steps for streamlining e-discovery from a lawyer s perspective

Sample Electronic Discovery Request for Proposal

The Business Case for ECA

Case 2:11-cv JWL-JPO Document 94 Filed 06/07/13 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS

This Webcast Will Begin Shortly

LEGAL HOLD OBLIGATIONS FOR DISTRICT EMPLOYEES

How To Write A Hit Report On A Lawsuit Against A Company

EDiscovery The table below is a guideline of the data that is expected to be presented by the WCB as the initial source.

A Brief Overview of ediscovery in California

PRIVACY IMPACT ASSESSMENT

BEYOND THE HYPE: Understanding the Real Implications of the Amended Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. A Clearwell Systems White Paper

UNDERSTANDING E DISCOVERY A PRACTICAL GUIDE. 99 Park Avenue, 16 th Floor New York, New York

CIVIL DISCOVERY STANDARDS* AUGUST 1999 [NOVEMBER 2003 DRAFT AMENDMENTS TO ELECTRONIC DISCOVERY STANDARDS]

ProSeLex White Page: The Basics on Handling Attachments in e-

Discovery. Metadata and E-Discovery A THOMSON WEST REPORT. Reprinted From E-Discovery: A Thomson West Report

Technical Evidence Management Theory: The early application of technology to reduce dispute resolution costs

COMING: NEW FEDERAL RULES ON E-DISCOVERY

(Previously published in The Legal Intelligencer, November 8, 2011) New Cost Guidelines for E-Discovery by Peter Vaira

The Essentials of E-Discovery

Metadata, Electronic File Management and File Destruction

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION. Case No. 5:07-CV-231-F

Best Practices: Defensibly Collecting, Reviewing, and Producing

Redefining High Speed ediscovery Processing & Production

A large and rapidly expanding Digital Universe

AD SUMMATION DII/eDII Guide

Clearwell E-Discovery Platform V6.6 Case Administration Guide. Revision: May 9, 2011

Making Sense of E-Discovery: 10 Plain Steps for Producing ESI

Catalyst CR Document Indexing Policy

Electronic Discovery:

COMPONENT TECHNOLOGIES FOR E-DISCOVERY AND PROTOTYPING OF SUIT-COPING SYSTEM

Case 1:13-cv AWI-SAB Document 41 Filed 02/20/14 Page 1 of 13

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Introduction to Recommendations for ESI Discovery in Federal Criminal Cases

AN E-DISCOVERY MODEL ORDER

Friday 31st October, 2008.

REINHART. Labor & Employment E-News E-NEWSLETTER ATTORNEYS:

Patent Litigation at the ITC: Views from the Government, In-House Attorneys and Outside Counsel

Vancouver Toronto Seattle

Enhancing Microsoft Exchange & Office 365 Archiving, Retention, and Discovery with Netmail

The Seventh Circuit Electronic Discovery Pilot Program Hope for the Future

Electronic Discovery. Answers to life s enduring questions

Predictability in E-Discovery

E-Discovery for Paralegals: Definition, Application and FRCP Changes. April 27, 2007 IPE Seminar

Transcription:

W Holding Company, Inc. et al v. AIG Insurance Company- Puerto Rico, et al Doc. 467 W HOLDING COMPANY, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, v. CHARTIS INSURANCE COMPANY OF PUERTO RICO, Defendant; IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, as receiver of Westernbank Puerto Rico, Plaintiff-Intervenor, v. Civil No. 11-2271 (GAG/BJM) FRANK STIPES GARCIA, et al., Cross-Claim Defendants, CHARTIS INSURANCE COMPANY OF PUERTO RICO, Previously-Joined Defendant, and MARLENE CRUZ CABALLERO, et al., Additional Defendants. ORDER GOVERNING DISCOVERY OF ELECTRONICALLY STORED INFORMATION FROM FDIC-R I. Preamble and Definitions For the reasons stated in the accompanying opinion, the parties to this action are hereby ordered to comply with the following as a default protocol for obtaining certain electronically stored information ( ESI ) from the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation in its capacity as receiver of Westernbank Puerto Rico ( FDIC-R ). FDIC-R and any other party may privately Dockets.Justia.com

W Holding Co. v. Chartis Ins. Co. of P.R. (FDIC v. Stipes Garcia) Page 2 agree to alter these terms as permitted by Fed. R. Civ. P. 29(b). In the absence of agreement, however, this order will control until it is amended or vacated by the court. The following terms are given special meanings: Native File means ESI in the electronic format of the application in which such ESI is normally created, viewed, and/or modified. Native Files are a subset of ESI. Metadata means (i) information embedded in a Native File that is not ordinarily viewable or printable from the application that generated, edited, or modified such Native File; and (ii) information generated automatically by the operation of a computer or other information technology system when a Native File is created, modified, transmitted, deleted, or otherwise manipulated by a user of such system. Metadata is a subset of ESI. Static Image means a representation of ESI produced by converting a Native File into a standard image format capable of being viewed and printed on standard computer systems. In the absence of agreement of the Parties or order of Court, a Static Image should be provided in Tagged Image File Format (TIFF, or.tif files). If a TIFF or.tif file cannot be created, then the Static Image should be provided in Portable Document Format (PDF). If Load Files were created in the process of converting Native Files to Static Images, or if Load Files may be created without undue burden or cost, Load Files shall be provided as set forth in Part III.D. Load File means the file necessary to load data into a reviewable database. A load file can, for example, specify what individual pages belong together as a document, what attachments are included with a document, where a document begins and ends, and what metadata is associated with a document. DMS Data means ESI in the following DMS iconnect databases identified by FDIC-R: WT ADP PC Payroll Employee Master 44 WT AFS ImageVision Additional Images (Checks/Returns/Lockbox) 55 WT AFS ImageVision Check Images 46_1 WT AFS ImageVision Check Images 46_2 WT AFS Return and Lockbox Check Images 54 WT Data Select CLCS Customer Master 15 WT Data Select CLCS Loan Master 16 WT Data Select CLCS Loan Participation Master 17

W Holding Co. v. Chartis Ins. Co. of P.R. (FDIC v. Stipes Garcia) Page 3 WT Data Select CLCS Loan Transaction History 18 WT Email Database WT Email Database 2 WT Fiserv Signature Customer Master 1 WT Fiserv Signature Deposit Master 6 WT Fiserv Signature Deposit Master Additional Details 7 WT Fiserv Signature Deposit Transaction History 8_1 WT Fiserv Signature Deposit Transaction History 8_2 WT Fiserv Signature GL Master 13 WT Fiserv Signature GL Transaction History 14 WT Fiserv Signature Loan Collateral 5 WT Fiserv Signature Loan Master 2 WT Fiserv Signature Loan Master Additional 52 WT Fiserv Signature Loan Part Tran History 53 WT Fiserv Signature Loan Participation 3 WT Fiserv Signature Loan Transaction History 4 WT Fiserv Signature Safety Deposit Box Master 11 WT Fiserv Signature Safety Deposit Box Transaction History 12 WT Fiserv Signature Time Deposit Master 9 WT Fiserv Signature Time Deposit Transaction History 10 WT Forensic Data 2 WT Forensic Data Email WT Forensic File Inventories WT GFI MailArchiver Email WT GFI MailArchiver Email Part2 WT INQ MortgageWare Loan Applications 19 WT INQ MortgageWare Loan Applications Custom Fields 1 20 WT INQ MortgageWare Loan Applications Custom Fields 2 21 WT Investigations Master Inventory WT Metavante Metaviewer Reports Deposit Loan Wires others 45 WT Microsoft Access AP Transaction History 38 WT Microsoft Access AP Vendor Master 37 WT Microsoft File Shares and Miscellaneous Documents 51 WT Scanned Documents WT Scanned Documents 2 WT TPG Derivative Genius CUSIP Buckets 42 WT TPG Derivative Genius General Ledger 43 WT TPG Derivative Genius Investment Portfolio 39 WT TPG Derivative Genius Investment Positions 41 WT TPG Derivative Genius Investor Instruments 40 WT TSC Trust Account Management 31 WT TSC Trust Account Plan Amendments 35 WT TSC Trust Account Plan Master 30 WT TSC Trust Account Plan Status 33 WT TSC Trust Account Withdrawal Transactions 34 WT TSC Trust Financial Reports (AP others) 36 WT TSC Trustee Payouts 32

W Holding Co. v. Chartis Ins. Co. of P.R. (FDIC v. Stipes Garcia) Page 4 WT T-Sys DXR Reports Statements Charge-offs others 50 WT William Stuckey NT-ABL Asset Customer Credit Lines 23 WT William Stuckey NT-ABL Asset Customer Master 22 WT William Stuckey NT-ABL Asset Loan Daily Status 28 WT William Stuckey NT-ABL Asset Loan Interest Rates 25 WT William Stuckey NT-ABL Asset Loan Limits 26 WT William Stuckey NT-ABL Asset Loan Master 24 WT William Stuckey NT-ABL Asset Loan Reduction Schedule 27 WT William Stuckey NT-ABL Asset Loan Transaction History 29 (See Docket No. 391-1, p. 12-13). Westernbank/Inyx Data means the Inyx bankruptcy ESI identified by FDIC-R from the following sources and with the following Bates codes: Bates Code AOL0000 AUDIT BAW000000 BERK00000000 Deloitte- EFILE E&Y GREEN_PR INYX_WB INYX_WB0000000 JR KACH LAURUS-INYX W000 WBEM00000000 WBPR00000000 ZINN_00000 Description Barry Woods (counsel for Westernbank) AOL account emails Barry Woods, counsel for Westernbank Berkowitz & Lago CPA, Inyx s public auditor Deloitte & Touche, Westernbank s auditor 4,537 Documents from dataroom used for Project Michael research Ernst & Young, Westernbank s auditor Inyx hardcopy and electronic production E&Y UK Supplemental Production 1/14/08 of Inyx Documents Joseph Rose, former corporate accountant for Inyx Jack Kachkar, CEO and Chairman of Inyx Weinberg & Company, Accountants for Jack Kachkar in Miami Westernbank Electronic Production Westernbank hard copy and electronic production David Zinn, CFO for Westernbank located in Miami (See Docket No. 391-1, p. 14). II. Initial Disclosures and Requests for Production Absent contrary agreement, FDIC-R must produce the documents identified in its Rule 26 initial disclosures, as well as the Westernbank/Inyx Data, in the way specified in part III. To the extent FDIC-R is obligated to supplement its initial disclosures, it is likewise obligated to supplement production under this part.

W Holding Co. v. Chartis Ins. Co. of P.R. (FDIC v. Stipes Garcia) Page 5 To obtain production from searchable DMS Data, the requestor must propose initial parameters for a query, such as search terms, databases, and fields of metadata to be searched. FDIC-R and the requestor must reasonably cooperate to reach an agreement on a query that will satisfy the request. FDIC-R s cooperation must include, but is not limited to, offering hit reports and suggesting alternative queries that better meet the request. The requestor s cooperation must include, but is not limited to, identifying specific complaints about queries and suggesting alternatives. FDIC-R will then produce all non-privileged data resulting from the agreed-upon query, subject to the terms in the following sections. Requests for production of any other data including non-searchable DMS Data, physical documents, and other sources of ESI are not governed by this part. III. Production Method A. Form of Production for Email All electronic email from Windows-Based ESI ( WESI ) shall be produced as Static Images complete with full text extracts and the following fields of metadata, to the extent the metadata is available: 1. Custodian (Name of Custodian from which file is being produced); 2. Other Custodians (Name(s) of custodian(s) who had exact copy of message before de-duplication); 3. Author (FROM field); 4. CC; 5. BCC; 6. Recipient (TO field); 7. MD5 Hash Value or Equivalent; 8. Date Sent (Date the email was sent); 9. Date Received (Date the file was received); 10. Time Sent (Time the email was received); 11. Time Received (Time the email was received); 12. File Type (Application used to create the file); 13. Page Count; 14. File Ext (Extension for the file); 15. PST Name; 16. Body Text (Extracted text); 17. Bates Begin (Beginning Production Number); 18. Bates End (Ending Production Number); 19. Attach Begin (Beginning Attachment Range Number);

W Holding Co. v. Chartis Ins. Co. of P.R. (FDIC v. Stipes Garcia) Page 6 20. Attach End (Ending Attachment Range Number). Electronic mail shall be produced along with attachments to the extent the message and/or any attachment is responsive, relevant and not privileged. As a general matter, subject to specific review, a message and its attachments(s) shall not be withheld from production based on the fact that one or more attachments are privileged, irrelevant or non-responsive. To the extent the message and/or one or more attachments is privileged or non-responsive, the responsive, non-privileged documents shall be produced along with placeholders indicating whether the individual record was withheld as non-responsive or privileged. B. Form of Production for Other WESI All other WESI (including attachments to electronic mail) shall be produced as Static Images complete with full text extracts and the following fields of metadata, to the extent the metadata is available: 1. Custodian (Name of Custodian from which file is being produced); 2. Other Custodians (Name(s) of custodian(s) who had exact copy of file before deduplication); 3. Author; 4. Doc Title (Title of file from properties); 5. Doc Subject (Subject of file from properties); 6. Created Date (Date the file was created); 7. Created Time (Time the file was created); 8. Last Modified Date (Date the file was last modified); 9. Last Modified Time (Time the file was last modified); 10. Last Saved By (Name of user who last saved the file); 11. File Type (Application used to create the file); 12. Doc Type; 13. Page Count; 14. File Ext (Extension for the file); 15. Path (Full path of the original location where the file was located); 16. MD5 Hash (MD5 hash value of the original native file); 17. Body Text (OCR for paper data or Extracted text for all ESI); 18. Bates Begin (Beginning Production Number); 19. Bates End (Ending Production Number); 20. Attach Begin (Beginning Attachment Range Number); 21. Attach End (Ending Attachment Range Number).

W Holding Co. v. Chartis Ins. Co. of P.R. (FDIC v. Stipes Garcia) Page 7 C. Form of Production for Spreadsheets ESI in the form of spreadsheets shall be produced in native format. There will be a static image placeholder within the final Bates-numbered set, stating that the document will be produced natively. The file name of the placeholder will be changed to reflect the static image s Bates number for cross-reference purposes. These documents will be accompanied with the appropriate load files indicating a cross reference to the Bates numbered Static Image. D. Load Files All WESI shall be produced along with an IPRO, Opticon, or Summation DII load file indicating Bates numbers and document breaks. Metadata shall be produced in Concordance DAT file format, DII format and summary text file for Summation, or XML format and extracted full text shall be provided in TXT file format at the document level. Non-Windows-Based Applications and Data shall be subject to the same production requirements to the extent technically and legally feasible. E. Data Culling The following file types shall be processed for production: Extension File Type Description cab Windows cabinet (data will be extracted and container file discarded) csv Comma Separated Values file dat Data file dbx Outlook Express E-mail Folder doc Microsoft Word docx Microsoft Word 2007 doom Microsoft Word Template dxl Lotus Notes Message File efax Electronic fax documents email Outlook Express E-mail Message eml Outlook Express Saved Mail Messages files emlx Apple Mail email message htm Web based Hypertext Markup Language File html Web based Hypertext Markup Language File ics Calendar items in Apple, Mozilla and Google key Apple Keynote presentation maildb MSN Mail file mbox Unix MAC file mailbox mdb Microsoft Access Database

W Holding Co. v. Chartis Ins. Co. of P.R. (FDIC v. Stipes Garcia) Page 8 mht Multipurpose Internet Mail Extension mim Multipurpose Internet Mail Extension mlm Novell GroupWise saved email message file mpp Microsoft Project msg Outlook Mail Message nsf Lotus Notes (data will be extracted and container file discarded) ost Microsoft Outlook Offline folder file (data will be converted, extracted, and container file discarded) pbx Outlook Express message folder file pdf Portable Document Format File pop PopMail messages file pps Microsoft PowerPoint Show file ppt Microsoft PowerPoint file pptx Microsoft PowerPoint 2007 pst Microsoft Outlook personal folder file (data will be extracted and container file discarded) rar WinRAR compressed archive (data will be extracted and container file discarded) rtf Rich Text Format tif Tagged Image Format F. Duplicates To avoid the production of more than one copy of a particular unique item, the Parties shall use industry standard MD5 or SHA-1 hash values within (1) all emails identified for production, and (2) all loose files identified for production. The Parties will not de-duplicate attachments to emails against loose files. G. Other Methods to Streamline Discovery The Parties shall meet and confer in good faith about any other technology or process that a producing party proposes to use to streamline the culling, review and production of ESI (e.g., email threading, near de-duplication, technology assisted review). The Parties shall make reasonable good faith efforts to resolve any objections to the use of such technology or process before seeking relief from the court. H. Production Media Documents shall be produced on external hard drives or readily accessible computer or electronic media, e.g., CDs or DVDs, or by FTP upload ( Production Media ). All Production Media should have the following four directories: (1) IMAGES for the images; (2) DATA for the

W Holding Co. v. Chartis Ins. Co. of P.R. (FDIC v. Stipes Garcia) Page 9.dat and.opt files; (3) TEXT for the extracted text/ocr files; and (4) NATIVES for the native Excel files. The Production Media shall identify: (a) the producing party s name; (b) the production date; and (c) the Bates Number range of the materials contained on the Production Media. I. Color Where the original of a produced document is in color, and color is material to the interpretation of the document, the receiving party may request that the document be produced in color (whether electronic or paper). J. Physical Documents Documents that exist solely in physical hard-copy format shall be converted and produced following the same protocols outlined above. The metadata shall indicate document breaks and identify the custodian from whom the document was collected. The.tiff files shall be subject to an Optical Character Recognition ( OCR ) process. K. Inaccessible Data The Parties need not collect documents stored on disaster recovery backup tapes unless a showing of specific need is made. IV. Labeling To the extent that the production reasonably preserves the organization by which Westernbank s documents were kept in the usual course of business, FDIC-R may furnish production without further review or labeling. Otherwise, FDIC-R must organize and label its production to correspond to the categories in the request. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 34(b)(2)(E)(i). V. Claw-Back Producing any ESI or documents for inspection shall be without prejudice to any claim that said ESI or documents are protected by the attorney-client privilege, work product doctrine, or any other applicable privilege or basis for withholding production. Upon demand, the receiving party shall return any such inadvertently produced ESI or documents subject to a privilege claim, including all copies thereof, to the producing party. To the extent that the parties

W Holding Co. v. Chartis Ins. Co. of P.R. (FDIC v. Stipes Garcia) Page 10 disagree over the application of these principles to any such production or challenge the privileged nature of such material, the receiving party shall not make use of the material in question until the matter is resolved by the Court. This order does not reduce the claw-back protections afforded by any other rule, such as Fed. R. Evid. 502 or Fed R. Civ. P. 26(b)(5)(B). VI. Conclusion This order does not alter the obligation under Local Rule 26(b) to make a reasonable and good faith effort to reach an agreement before bringing discovery disputes to the court. Moreover, the parties and their attorneys can expect stiff monetary and other sanctions to be imposed against the losing party in any discovery-related motions. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 37. IT IS SO ORDERED. In San Juan, Puerto Rico, this 3rd day of April, 2013. S/Bruce J. McGiverin BRUCE J. McGIVERIN United States Magistrate Judge