Dealing with Medical Errors



Similar documents
Disclosing Medical Errors: 2008 and Beyond. Wendy Levinson, MD Professor of Medicine University of Toronto

Improving open disclosure in Dutch hospitals

Proposed Apology Legislation: from the Medical Perspective

Disclosing Medical Errors to Patients: Developing and Implementing Effective Programs

Open Disclosure Workshop with Case Studies

Georgene Saliba MBA, CPHRM Administrator, Risk Management & Patient Safety Lehigh Valley Health Network Allentown, PA

FULL DISCLOSURE OF MEDICAL ERRORS. Helen Gulgun Bukulmez, J.D.

Ghazala Sharieff MD, MBA Medical Director, Quality and Medical Management, Scripps Health. Scott Buchholz Esq Dummit, Buchholz & Trapp

Mastering Adverse Outcomes

Disclosing Medical Errors to Patients: International Developments and Future Directions

Ooopps : Medical Errors and the Ethical Landscape

Malpractice Reform: In Search of an Approach that is Rational, Fair, and Promotes Quality Improvement

IT S OK TO SAY I M SORRY. Anything you say can and will be used against you in a court of law.

CHAPTER 21 Error in medical practice

ADMITTING MISTAKES: ETHICAL CHOICES AND REASONING. Mark S. Hochberg, M.D. Department of Surgery New York University School of Medicine

2008 The Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois

The End of Malpractice Litigation? Improving Care and Communications to Reduce Risk

The Risk Manager s Role in Disclosure of Medical Error: Seeing Ourselves as Others See Us

The legal framework for patient safety in Switzerland

Tort Reform in Utah: Disclosure, Apology and Resolution

GUIDE TO PATIENT COUNSELLING

Physicians face a dilemma when deciding whether and. Should We Disclose Harmful Medical Errors to Patients? If So, How?

CLINICAL CASE 2 Disclosure and the Retrospectoscope Commentary by Thomas H. Gallagher, MD, and R. James Brenner, MD

Australian Safety and Quality Framework for Health Care

Medical Liability Task Force

CHAPTER 24 DEPOSITION GUIDANCE FOR NURSES

Virtual Mentor American Medical Association Journal of Ethics April 2007, Volume 9, Number 4:

Statutory duty of candour with criminal sanctions Briefing paper on existing accountability mechanisms

The difficult duty of disclosing medical errors

Examining Elements to Prepare the Pediatric Practitioner

Medical Malpractice VOIR DIRE QUESTIONS


Responding to Complaints in Your Practice

S Encourages Providers and Insurers to Voluntarily Report Medical Errors, Apologize and Make Good-faith Offers of Compensation

Physicians on Medical Malpractice Reform Options

QUESTION NO. 3. Amendment to Titles 1 and 3 of the Nevada Revised Statutes. CONDENSATION (ballot question)

Mitigating Legal and Ethical Risks. Conflict of Interest. Goals. True or False. True or False

How to Professionally and Personally Survive a Malpractice Suit John Baillie, MB, ChB, FRCP, FACG

1O SECRETS OF GEORGIA CAR WRECK CLAIMS

PFSP. adverse events, complaints, and medical. legal litigation. Dealing with

Medical Malpractice BAD DOCTORS. G. Randall Green, MD, JD St. Joseph s Hospital Health Center Syracuse, New York

It s important to understand the process and react properly when it occurs.

The Good Old Days. The Good Old Days. Disclosure & Early Offer: How it Started, where it is Going.

Your Personal Guide To Your Personal Injury Lawsuit

Learning when things go wrong. Marg Way Director, Clinical Governance Alfred Health, Melbourne

TESTIMONY OF WILLIAM M. SAGE, MD, JD PROFESSOR COLUMBIA LAW SCHOOL BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON HEALTH, EDUCATION, LABOR, AND PENSIONS UNITED STATES SENATE

Communication to Prevent and Respond to Medical Injuries: WA State Collaborative

Quality of care series Number 1: Medical error

Crisis Management Guide

Virtual Mentor American Medical Association Journal of Ethics March 2009, Volume 11, Number 3:

Disclosure of Medical Errors: The Right Thing to Do, But What is the Cost?

PRE-ACTION PROTOCOL. Re: Road Traffic Accidents and Personal Injury Claims The aims of the pre-action protocols are:

Financial Disclosure: Discuss. Definition. Risk Management Advice in Dealing with the Unhappy 20/20 Lasik Patient

Risk Management and Medical Liability

For Those in Treatment

Hip Transplant Detailed Study

Evaluating a Medical Malpractice Case

After the Error: Disclosure Responsibilities and Controversies

Legal Issues in Documentation. 1. From a legal standpoint, failure to document client care means which of the following?

Working to standard: a code of conduct for support workers in health care. 1.1 Welcome to this code of conduct for support workers in health care.

Top 5 Malpractice Claims Made Against Nursing Professionals

Best Practices for Managing Layoffs

Does Voluntary Disclosure of Medical Errors Prompt or Prevent Medical Malpractice Suits?

Guide to Reference Checking Resource Information for Classified Supervisors and Managers

Conducting Emotionally Difficult Conversations. John Banja, PhD Center For Ethics Emory University

A Guide for Childhood Sexual Abuse Survivors

Being Open Policy P033. Version Date Revision Description Editor Status

KNOW THE FACTS Medical Review Panels are Constitutional in Kentucky

10 things. sued A publication of Texas Medical Liability Trust

Judgment & Comprehension in Nursing Situations Subtest

How To Report Health Care Errors

7/24/2015. Disclosure. Preventing Medication Errors in a Just Culture Environment. Blame Free Culture. Objectives.

Medical Malpractice Legal Problems!!! Aaron G Hill CCP Sentara Careplex Hampton Va VCU Medical Center Richmond, Va

Care Transitions Training Videoconference December 17, 2009 Questions and Answers

The Code. Professional standards of practice and behaviour for nurses and midwives

The Malpractice Lawsuit:

Vexical s Solution to the Patient Responsibility Conundrum

The two sides disagree on how much money, if any, could have been awarded if Plaintiffs, on behalf of the class, were to prevail at trial.

CLAIMS AGAINST TELEPHONE ANSWERING SERVICES: THE TRILOGY OF PREVENTION, HANDLING AND RESOLUTION PART TWO: WHAT TO DO WHEN A CLAIM HAPPENS

AIDET Overview: Why, What & How

The insurance company is also responsible for reasonable towing or storage charges on your vehicle until you receive written notice otherwise.

The Emotional Bank Account

Explaining Separation/Divorce to Children

Patient Safety in Primary Care: patient involvement & the Duty of Candour

Newborns with Trisomy 18: To Treat or not to Treat? Have Times Changed?

Physician Communication Skills Decrease Malpractice Claims

An Employee's Guide. Cambridgeshire & West Norfolk PCTs/PCP Cambridge & Peterborough Mental Health Partnership NHS Trust Anglia Support Partnership

Introduction to Medical Malpractice Insurance

Great Bay Mental Health Associates, Inc. Notice to Clients and Consent to Mental Health Treatment Agreement Courtney A. Atherton, MA, LCMHC, MLADC

Listen, Protect, and Connect

How to Report A Claim

A Role for Apology in Medical Malpractice: Apology, Forgiveness, and Reconciliation. By Melissa Barcena

Your Guide to Recovery

TRIAL IS DEFINED AS, A FAILURE TO SETTLE. The Mediator s Perspective

Free Legal Consumer Guide Series

Title: Duty of candour and the disclosure of adverse events to patients and families

Medical Malpractice and Patient safety: Exploring uncharted territory in Eastern Mediterranean Region

A REASONABLE PERSPECTIVE ON RECREATIONAL INJURY LIABILITY

Saying sorry when things go wrong. Communicating patient safety incidents with patients, their families and carers

Policy and Procedure for Claims Management

Transcription:

Dealing with Medical Errors What should I say? R Singh MB BChir MA (Cantab) MBA MD (SUNY) Department of Family Medicine Associate Professor and Associate Director, UB Patient Safety Research Center Presented in 2010 by gurdev Singh, Director, UB Patient Safety research Center Patient Safety Research Center www.fammed.buffalo.edu/safety

Dealing with Medical Errors What should I say? R Singh MB BChir MA (Cantab) MBA MD (SUNY) Department of Family Medicine Associate Professor and Associate Director, UB Patient Safety Research Center Health Warning: This talk may raise more questions than it answers!! Presented in 2010 by gurdev Singh, Director, UB Patient Safety research Center Patient Safety Research Center www.fammed.buffalo.edu/safety

The Six ACGME Core Competencies Communication Knowledge Professionalism Patient Care Practice Based Learning System Based Practice Safety Transcends all Competencies Singh 07

Safety is a fundamental system property. Without safety there can be no quality of care IOM Patient Safety Is freedom from accidental injury due to medical care or medical error Gurdev Singh 2007

National Burden of Systemic Errors in the Health Care The(US) TheUS Healthcare 2-5 Jumbo jets of the Health Care Industry drop out of the sky every day (Analogy after Leape: the Safety Guru of USA) 1.5 Million/year Incidents of Harm And then there are other adverse Events!! Gurdev Singh 2007 Singh 07

International Rankings and National Health Expenditure (Through Patient s Lens) AUS CAN GER NZ UK USA Overall Ranking 4 5 1 2 3 6 Patient Safety 4 5 2 3 1 6 Effectiveness 4 2 3 6 5 1? Patient-centeredness 3 5 1 2 4 6 Timeliness 4 6 1 2 5 3 Efficiency 4 5 1 2 3 6 Equity 2 4 5 3 1 6 Health Expend./Capita $2903 3003 2996 1886 2231 $5,635 $7600 Source: The Commonwealth Fund : 2006. Singh 07

Our Goal Congressional Budget Office Head, Peter Orszag: Times Nov 08 Singh 08

Our Goal If this is not a MAJOR National Disaster my name is not gurdev Congressional Budget Office Head, Peter Orszag: Times Nov 08 Singh 08

Singh 07 Singh: Jan 09

Singh 07 This constitutes nearly 50% of the surgical Never Events Wrong body part : 30% Wrong procedure : 16% Wrong patient: 4% COST About 20Billion/yr CMS press release 2006 (Minnesota Study) Singh: Jan 09

Patient Safety Awareness Week March 7-13 March 7-13

Currently we live in Fear R and G Singh Scherkenbach s Cycle of Fear, 1991

Currently we live in Fear Kill the messenger (denial; shift the blame) R and G Singh Scherkenbach s Cycle of Fear, 1991

Currently we live in Fear Kill the messenger (denial; shift the blame) Filter the data (game the system) R and G Singh Scherkenbach s Cycle of Fear, 1991

Currently we live in Fear Micromanage (Barking up the wrong tree) Kill the messenger (denial; shift the blame) Filter the data (game the system) R and G Singh Scherkenbach s Cycle of Fear, 1991

Currently we live in Fear Micromanage (Barking up the wrong tree) Kill the messenger (denial; shift the blame) Filter the data (game the system) R and G Singh Scherkenbach s Cycle of Fear, 1991

From January to May, I work for the government to pay for my income tax and from May to October to pay for my malpractice insurance Singh

There are increasing calls for Error Disclosure from various directions with increasing disclosure protection Singh

Overview Background Current culture of blame and non-disclosure Ideal culture of safety with open disclosure Ethical principles What do patients want? What do physicians think? Risks and Benefits of Disclosure A practical approach to disclosure Conclusions

Background1/3 Errors are common Harm sometimes occurs it is preventable System problems are usually at the root Humans are often unfairly blamed To err is human Current culture is conducive to hiding errors to avoid repercussions When errors are hidden we cannot learn from them

Example: System for ordering labs and obtaining results (a small sub-system!) Doctor Test Log Doctor s In-Box Lab Slip Lab Report Clerk Doctor Patient To be filed Patient Specimen collection Chart

Background2/3 When errors are hidden we cannot learn from them We need to change the culture!! In a Culture of Safety: Micromanage (Barking up the wrong tree) Fear Filter the data (game the system) Kill the messenger (denial; shift the blame) Scherkenbach s Cycle of Fear, 1991 People are able to discuss errors openly without fear of repercussions Attention is focused on faulty systems rather than blaming individuals for all problems This includes disclosing errors to patients and families where appropriate R and G Singh Currently we live in

Background3/3 Disclosing errors to patients and families How can we decide whether it is appropriate to disclose or not?

Ethical Principles that can guide our disclosure decisions *Beneficence act in the best interests of the patient *Nonmaleficence - do no harm *Patient Autonomy protect and foster a patient's free, uncoerced choices *Justice fairness of healthcare in society

If it s often the right thing to do why not just do it?

From January to May, I work for the government to pay for my income tax and from May to October to pay for my malpractice insurance Singh

What do patients want?1/3 Gallagher et al JAMA 2003 289(8)1001-7 Patients wanted disclosure of all harmful errors and information about: *What happened *Why the error happened *How the error's consequences will be mitigated *How recurrences will be prevented. NOTE: they don t want to know who s fault it is Patients also desired emotional support, saying that they would be less upset if the physician: *Talked honestly *Showed compassion *Apologized Qualitative study (13 focus groups of patients/physicians)

What do patients want?2/ Schwappach Int J Qual H Care 2004 16(4):317-26 Internet survey 1017 citizens of Germany In cases with a severe outcome, if the physician was: Honest Empathic Accountable Then, there was a 59% decrease in support for strong sanctions (e.g., lawsuits) against the physician

What do patients want?3/3 Witman et al Arch Int Med 1996 156:2565-2569. 149 outpatients at an academic medicine clinic 98% wanted to be informed, even of a minor error For errors of various severities, patients reported that if they were informed of the error by the physician (vs. finding out from another source) then they were: Error of Moderate Severity Less likely to change doctors (60 vs. 92%) Less likely to report the physician (23 vs. 52%) Less likely to file a lawsuit (12 vs. 20%)

Why do people sue?1/2 Of course, every case is different. Studies have shown that there is little, if any, correlation between quality of care and likelihood of malpractice claims. Many suits are filed even when no lapse in quality has take place. In cases where medical negligence has taken place, only a small minority of patients or families file suit (perhaps as low as 3%) So, why do people sue??

Why do people sue?2/2 Hickson et al JAMA 1992;268(11):1413-4 Interviewed 127 mothers who had sued due to perinatal injuries to their infants. Reasons for filing suit included: Advised to sue by knowledgeable acquaintance (33%) Recognized a cover-up (24%) Needed money (24%) Needed information (20%) Wanted to protect others from harm (19%) Respondents believed that their physician(s): Tried to mislead them (48%) Did not talk openly (32%) Did not listen (13%)

What do physicians think? Gallagher et al JAMA 2003 289(8)1001-7 Qualitative Study Physicians agreed that harmful errors should be disclosed but "choose their words carefully" when telling patients about errors. often avoided stating that an error occurred, why the error happened, or how recurrences would be prevented. Physicians were upset when errors occurred and expressed a desire to apologize but worried that an apology might create legal liability.

Benefits and Risks of Disclosure1/2 Benefits to the Patient *Opportunity to receive corrective treatment *Helps them to make informed decisions *Promotes trust in the physician *Alleviates worry why did that happen to me? *Acknowledges fallibility encourages patient to take greater responsibility for their own care *Opportunity to receive fair compensation Benefits to the Physician May be less likely to be sued *If sued, the fact that you disclosed may help your case *May help alleviate stress *Fulfills your moral obligation to tell the truth

Benefits and Risks of Disclosure2/2 Risks to the Patient Anxiety / Confusion (but pt s in Gallagher s study did not report this) Loss of trust in the system These risks may justify non-disclosure of inconsequential errors Risks to the Physician Risk of being sued (if the patient wouldn t otherwise know about the error) Risk of disciplinary action Possible loss of reputation Loss of patients

Joint Commission Requirement (Endorsed by most Patient Safety and Risk Management organizations) As a requirement of Joint Commission certification, hospitals must develop policies on disclosure of unanticipated outcomes to patients/families. Disclosure only required for unanticipated outcomes ie when there is harm Don t have to disclose an error if no harm results But: Does this meet the ethical standard? Who is to decide what harm is?...

Was there harm? Differing perceptions of harm. Is it harm if Treatment is delayed slightly? Hospital stay is prolonged? Patient undergoes unnecessary tests? Patient has to incur additional costs? Hospital or health plan has to incur additional costs? Harm may not be apparent until after discharge. Therefore the patient may need to be informed of warning signs for potential harm. These and other practical issues need to be resolved

What should I say? As a student do nothing by yourself! If you discover an error: Inform your supervisor(s) Discuss possible disclosure options Ultimately the physician has to decide whether to disclose and what to say

What should I say? As a physician If no or mild harm Consider informing (weigh the risks and benefits) If significant harm Consult with risk management / malpractice carrier Consider informing (weigh the risks and benefits) If you decide to disclose: What should you say?

Error disclosure protocol:1/6 Consider doing the following (in a timely fashion): (after weighing up the risks and benefits) 1. Acknowledge the error 2. Apologize and empathize 3. Accept some responsibility 4. Commit to investigate & prevent 5. Set the tone 6. Address adverse consequences 7. Address any other concerns 8. Arrange follow-up

Error disclosure protocol:2/6 1. Set the tone in person eye-level private & respectful consider participants check comfort allow time for the patient/family to react to what you say listen

Error disclosure protocol:3/6 2. Acknowledge the error Be direct Use words such as error or mistake I think you received the wrong medication by mistake You are right - you were supposed to get the MRI today. Sounds like an error was made.

Error disclosure protocol:4/6 3. Apologize and empathize I m sorry that this happened to you is not an admission of guilt it s not a true apology either! I certainly understand your anger about the unnecessary delay in your discharge an expression of empathy I m sorry I made a mistake is a true apology however, it is an admission of guilt may create legal liability in some states may be premature (most harm is multi-factorial and involves system failures)

Error disclosure protocol:5/6 4. Accept some responsibility for the error and its consequences If you are sure it was your error, consider saying so: It was my mistake. I forgotten to write the order. [Note that this can create legal liability] If it is possible you may have contributed to the error, consider saying so: I m not sure how this happened. I may have written the wrong order, or maybe it was illegible, or maybe someone else made a mistake in following the orders. Don t be too sure about your personal responsibility without some pause for reflection and supervision. Guilt can influence your words.

Error disclosure protocol:6/6 5. Commit to investigate and prevent Commit to investigate the error to find its causes Commit to inform the patient of the findings Commit to attempt to prevent the error from happening again 6. Address adverse consequences Screen & work up as needed Educate/advise patient as needed 7. Address any other concerns 8. Arrange Follow-up

Tips for safe disclosure Don t t be evasive *Make yourself available *Don t t say No comment Don t t jump to conclusions prematurely some questions require further investigation before they can be answered. Say that you are not sure rather than blaming someone else or denying responsibility immediately. Don t t use jargon the patient may think you are trying to confuse them. Don t t promise something unless you can deliver.

Conclusions - Theory Ethical arguments in favor of full and honest disclosure of all errors, regardless of harm caused, are widely recognized. JC requires that errors be disclosed if harm occurs. Most patients desire full disclosure and an apology. Fear of litigation makes many physicians feel uncomfortable disclosing information and apologizing. The desire to find out what happened, and to prevent recurrence are the cause of many lawsuits. Disclosure may decrease the risk of litigation since it helps to meet these needs further studies are needed.

Conclusions - Practice Don t despair (it s not all doom and gloom!) Most errors have relatively mild effects as a physician, errors will happen in your practice but you can manage them effectively if you communicate well with your patients For errors that cause serious harm you are not alone help is available

Final Thought Treat other people the way you would want to be treated.

Thanks and from Ranjit Singh