ELECTRONIC DISCOVERY. Dawn M. Curry



Similar documents
In-House Solutions to the E-Discovery Conundrum

PROPOSED ELECTRONIC DATA DISCOVERY GUIDELINES FOR THE MARYLAND BUSINESS AND TECHONOLOGY CASE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM JUDGES

Electronic Discovery and the New Amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure: A Guide For In-House Counsel and Attorneys

UNDERSTANDING E DISCOVERY A PRACTICAL GUIDE. 99 Park Avenue, 16 th Floor New York, New York

DISCOVERY OF ELECTRONICALLY-STORED INFORMATION IN STATE COURT: WHAT TO DO WHEN YOUR COURT S RULES DON T HELP

E-Discovery in Michigan. Presented by Angela Boufford

Electronic Discovery

REALITY BYTES: A NEW ERA OF ELECTRONIC DISCOVERY


Elements of a Good Document Retention Policy. Discovery Services WHITE PAPER

Michigan's New E-Discovery Rules Provide Ways to Reduce the Scope and Burdens of E-Discovery

E-DISCOVERY & PRESERVATION OF ELECTRONIC EVIDENCE. Ana Maria Martinez April 14, 2011

Legal Arguments & Response Strategies for E-Discovery

Amendments to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. electronically stored information. 6 Differences from Paper Documents

Predictability in E-Discovery

How To Write A Hit Report On A Lawsuit Against A Company

Reduce Cost and Risk during Discovery E-DISCOVERY GLOSSARY

The Top Ten List (and one) of Changes to the Federal Rules

E-Discovery: New to California 1

GUIDELINES FOR USE OF THE MODEL AGREEMENT REGARDING DISCOVERY OF ELECTRONICALLY STORED INFORMATION

Electronic Evidence and Discovery: The Changes in the Federal Rules. April 25, 2007 Bill Belt

E-Discovery Quagmires An Ounce of Prevention is Worth a Pound of Cure Rebecca Herold, CISSP, CISA, CISM, FLMI Final Draft for February 2007 CSI Alert

Xact Data Discovery. Xact Data Discovery. Xact Data Discovery. Xact Data Discovery. ediscovery for DUMMIES LAWYERS. MDLA TTS August 23, 2013

A PRIMER ON THE NEW ELECTRONIC DISCOVERY PROVISIONS IN THE ALABAMA RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE

E-Discovery: The New Federal Rules of Civil Procedure A Practical Approach for Employers

New E-Discovery Rules: Is Your Company Prepared?

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

2015 ANNUAL MEETING Vancouver, BC September 11, Recent Amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure: A New Scope of Discovery?

grouped into five different subject areas relating to: 1) planning for discovery and initial disclosures; 2)

The E-Discovery Process

Data Preservation Duties and Protocols

E-Discovery in Practice: A Roadmap for Financial Institutions

Electronic Discovery How can I be prepared? September 2010

Best Practices in Electronic Record Retention

Case 2:14-cv KHV-JPO Document 12 Filed 07/10/14 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS

BEYOND THE HYPE: Understanding the Real Implications of the Amended Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. A Clearwell Systems White Paper

A Brief Overview of ediscovery in California

e-docs and Forensics in the New e-discovery Era

E-Discovery in Employment Litigation: Making Practical, Yet Defensible Decisions

NightOwlDiscovery. EnCase Enterprise/ ediscovery Strategic Consulting Services

Record Retention, ediscovery, Spoliation: Issues for In-House Counsel

CORPORATE RECORD RETENTION IN AN ELECTRONIC AGE (Outline)

SEVENTH CIRCUIT ELECTRONIC DISCOVERY PILOT PROGRAM FOR DISCOVERY OF ELECTRONICALLY STORED

102 ediscovery Shakedown: Lowering your Risk. Kindred Healthcare

4/23/2014. E-Discovery. What is ESI? Discovery. Electronically Stored Information. The downside. Discovery generally. E-Discovery

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DIVISION. v. Case No. [MODEL] ORDER REGARDING E-DISCOVERY IN PATENT CASES

E-Discovery Toolkit for Educational Institutions

PRESERVATION AND PRODUCTION OF ELECTRONIC RECORDS

What Happens When Litigation Starts? How Do You Get People Not To Generate the Bad Documents?

General Items Of Thought

How To Handle Electronic Discovery In Aransas

E-Discovery Best Practices

Electronic Discovery: Litigation Holds, Data Preservation and Production

Rule 26. General Provisions Governing Discovery.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

COURSE DESCRIPTION AND SYLLABUS LITIGATING IN THE DIGITAL AGE: ELECTRONIC CASE MANAGEMENT ( ) Fall 2014

Overview of E-Discovery and Depositions in U.S. IP Litigation

ZL UNIFIED ARCHIVE A Project Manager s Guide to E-Discovery. ZL TECHNOLOGIES White Paper

ESI DEMYSTIFIED. Streamlining the E-Discovery Process Through Internal Processes and Controls. Melinda Burrows Bruce Cosgrove*

THE IMPACT OF THE ELECTRONIC DISCOVERY RULES ON THE EEOC PROCESS

Proactive Data Management for ediscovery

E-DISCOVERY IN FEDERAL COURT: SIX CHANGES YOU SHOULD MAKE TO YOUR PRACTICE IN THE DISCOVERY PHASE OF THE CASE By Kary Pratt

DOCSVAULT WhitePaper. Concise Guide to E-discovery. Contents

How To Schedule A Case In The Court Of Appeals

B. Preservation is not limited to simply avoiding affirmative acts of destruction because day-to-day operations routinely alter or destroy evidence.

Patent Litigation at the ITC: Views from the Government, In-House Attorneys and Outside Counsel

Purpose: To ensure that e-discovery Requests and Litigation Hold Notices are received, routed and responded to in a timely and thorough manner.

REED COLLEGE. ediscovery GUIDELINES FOR PRESERVATION AND PRODUCTION OF ELECTRONIC RECORDS

Records and Information Management and Retention

LEGAL HOLD OBLIGATIONS FOR DISTRICT EMPLOYEES

Assembly Bill No. 5 CHAPTER 5

What You Should Know About ediscovery

By Faith M. Heikkila

Outlaw v. Willow Oral Argument Motions for Sanctions

Transcription:

ELECTRONIC DISCOVERY Dawn M. Curry Nutter McClennen & Fish LLP World Trade Center West 155 Seaport Boulevard Boston, Massachusetts 02210 Telephone 617.439.2000 www.nutter.com

E-Discovery Facts 93-99% of all information is now electronic 30% is never printed to hard copy 60 billion emails are sent and received each business day 1 gigabyte of data = 75,000-100,000 hard copy pages 2,500 pages per box (30-40 boxes per gigabyte) A single laptop can contain 30 gbs of data Nutter McClennen & Fish LLP www.nutter.com 2

FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE (AMENDMENTS EFFECTIVE DEC. 1, 2006) Meet and Confer: Rule 26(f) Production of electronic documents has always been required in litigation, but was not usually addressed until discovery was underway. Amended rules change the time frame in which these issues are addressed. Electronically stored information ( ESI ) must be discussed early on in the litigation at the Rule 26(f) conference which will occur within less than 120 days after a Complaint is served. Nutter McClennen & Fish LLP www.nutter.com 3

FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE cont d Reasonably Accessible Data? Rule 26 provides that a party need not provide discovery of ESI from sources that the party identifies as not reasonably accessible because of undue burden or cost. Accessible data must be produced. E.g., files on active networks and local hard drives Data that is not reasonably accessible must still be preserved. E.g., back-up data for disaster recovery because it can be time consuming/ expensive to unpack data and restore it to an accessible form. Nutter McClennen & Fish LLP www.nutter.com 4

Cost Shifting Should be considered only when electronic discovery imposes an undue burden or expense on the responding party. Apply Zubulake 7 factor test. Nutter McClennen & Fish LLP www.nutter.com 5

Zubulake I: 7 factor cost-shifting analysis 1. The extent to which the request is specifically tailored to the discovery of relevant information; 2. The availability of such information from other sources; 3. The total cost of production, compared to the amount in controversy; 4. The total cost of production, compared to the resources available to each party; 5. The relative ability of each party to control costs and its incentive to do so; 6. The importance of the issues at stake in the litigation; and 7. The relative benefits to the parties of obtaining the information. Nutter McClennen & Fish LLP www.nutter.com 6

Safe Harbor Provision Fed. Rule Civ. P. 37 If documents are not properly preserved, and the Court finds spoliation, could be sanctioned. Rule 37(e) creates a safe harbor from sanctions for spoliation if the ESI is lost in the regular course of business. Rule states that [a]bsent extraordinary circumstances, a Court may not impose sanctions under these rules on a party for failing to provide ESI lost as a result of the routine, good-faith operation of an electronic information system. The party must act in good faith. Nutter McClennen & Fish LLP www.nutter.com 7

When Does the Duty to Preserve Arise? Duty to preserve arises upon reasonable anticipation of litigation. Duty to preserve what you know/reasonably should know is relevant to the action; reasonably calculated to lead to admissible evidence; reasonably likely to be requested in discovery; or is the subject of a pending discovery request. Nutter McClennen & Fish LLP www.nutter.com 8

What To Do Upon Reasonable Anticipation of Litigation Analyze claims to identify relevant categories of information and key custodians that may have such information. Determine relevant time periods. Identify what systems/devices/databases are most likely to contain the information and decide which parts of the client s records retention policy need to be suspended to preserve all relevant data. Nutter McClennen & Fish LLP www.nutter.com 9

What To Do Upon Reasonable Anticipation of Litigation (cont.) Send a litigation hold memo to all persons likely to have relevant data. The litigation hold memo should instruct clients on their obligations to preserve information, including ESI. Form, content, and distribution of a litigation hold will vary depending on case and client circumstances, but there are sample memos on the intranet. Nutter McClennen & Fish LLP www.nutter.com 10

What To Do Upon Reasonable Anticipation of Litigation (cont.) Analyze and document the burden/cost of producing data such as back-up tapes, including the onus of restoring and searching that data. Record your decisions and rationales concerning preservation in writing. Discuss whether or not an outside vendor should be hired to assist in the preservation and production of your data, and review of data from the other side. Nutter McClennen & Fish LLP www.nutter.com 11

Collection of Electronic Documents Where is the data stored (Local hard drives? Network drives? Back up tapes? Blackberries? Home computers?) What mail server is being used (Microsoft exchange? Lotus notes?) Size of email accounts? Limitations on the size? Is there proprietary software being used by the company? What back up software is being used? What is the retention/recycle process for back-up tapes? Depending on the volume of data to be collected, may decide to use a vendor to assist with the collection. Chain of custody issues. Nutter McClennen & Fish LLP www.nutter.com 12

Review of Documents What type of review tool with you use (In house software? Online review tool?) What search capabilities are available with the review tool? Who will conduct the review? (In-house counsel? Outside counsel? Vendor?) Nutter McClennen & Fish LLP www.nutter.com 13

Production of Documents Try to come to an agreement with the other side as to how each side will produce their electronic documents. Rule 34 states that if the parties do not agree, ESI must be produced in the form in which it is ordinarily maintained (i.e., native format). Native format: Includes metadata, but needs the associated applications/programs to access the information. TIFF/PDF: Easier to review; can bates-stamp these documents for easier identification later in the litigation. The parties can agree to produce different types of ESI in different forms. Nutter McClennen & Fish LLP www.nutter.com 14

Privilege Issues ESI can include voluminous amounts of information. Rule 26(b)(5)(B) states that a party who inadvertently produces privileged information must notify the recipient and assert the basis for privilege. The recipient must promptly return, sequester, or destroy the materials. If the claim of privilege is disputed, the parties can file the information under seal for the Court to decide. BEWARE: Rule 26 does not address whether the privilege has been waived as to third parties by the inadvertent production. Nutter McClennen & Fish LLP www.nutter.com 15

Protective Orders Used to protect sensitive/ confidentiality information. If there is a protective order, need to know how it addresses production of these documents (e.g., stamp Confidential ). Nutter McClennen & Fish LLP www.nutter.com 16