Risk and Quality Management Program Self-Assessment



Similar documents
How To Manage Risk

ARTICLE 8. ASSISTED LIVING FACILITIES

QUALITY LIFE CONCEPTS. REVIEW DATE: 5/11 Revision Date: 5/20/11 Version: Two. Incident Management

4. Emergency medical treatment due to injury or physical illness. 5. Hospitalization (Medical) due to injury or physical illness

Management of Health, Safety and the Environment

Section. Page. Authority. V. Definitions. I. Policy

Children, Families, and Elder Affairs Committee

Department of Human Services CHILD WELFARE PROTOCOL

42 C.F.R Quality assurance and performance improvement.

UNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI MEDICAL CENTER RISK MANAGEMENT PLAN

NORTHCARE NETWORK. POLICY TITLE: Event/Death Reporting, Notification & Monitoring EFFECTIVE DATE: 10/1/10 (Retro.) REVIEW DATE: 12/18/13

The Encana Service Provider Safety Manual

CHAPTER 5 - SAFETY ASSESSMENTS, LOG OF DEFICIENCIES AND CORRECTIVE ACTION PLANS

RESTRAINT AND SECLUSION

Human Research Protection Program Good Clinical Practice Guidance for Investigators Investigator & Research Staff Responsibilities

FCPA 10 Hallmarks Self- Assessment

414 MANDATED REPORTING OF CHILD NEGLECT OR PHYSICAL OR SEXUAL ABUSE

OFFICE OF MENTAL HEALTH AND SUBSTANCE ABUSE SERVICES BULLETIN

ADMINISTRATIVE POLICY & PROCEDURE RISK MANAGEMENT PLAN (MMCIP)

PATIENT CARE POLICY III.

INTRODUCTION 1 STRUCTURE AND APPROACH 1 CONTEXT AND PURPOSE 2 STATEMENT OF PURPOSE 3

Settlement Agreement Implementation Structure

Incident Reporting Procedure

Operational Risk Management Program Version 1.0 October 2013

Guide to Assessment and Rating for Regulatory Authorities

The Physician s Guide to The Joint Commission s Hospital Standards and Accreditation Process

INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT #877 POLICY. Buffalo-Hanover-Montrose

Injury and Work- Related Illness Prevention Program

Developing Safety Mindfulness in Staff: Reducing Adverse Incidents in a Behavioral Health Care Organization

City of London Supported Housing. Incident Reporting Procedure

MANDATED REPORTING OF CHILD NEGLECT OR PHYSICAL OR SEXUAL ABUSE

The anglo american Safety way. Safety Management System Standards

Legal Issues in Documentation. 1. From a legal standpoint, failure to document client care means which of the following?

The State Claims Agency Clinical Indemnity Scheme Incident Notification Requirements.

Hounslow Safeguarding Adults Board Partnership Provider Concerns Terms of Reference

DOE O 226.1A, IMPLEMENTATION OF DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OVERSIGHT POLICY CONTRACTOR ASSURANCE SYSTEMS CRITERIA ATTACHMENT 1, APPENDIX A

Office of Developmental Programs Provider Quality Management Plans Presented by Dolores Frantz, Quality Management Director, ODP

A Comparison. Safety and Health Management Systems and Joint Commission Standards. Sources for Comparison

An Integrated Operational Risk Management Framework for Power Generation

MANDATED REPORTING OF CHILD NEGLECT OR PHYSICAL OR SEXUAL ABUSE

WEST VIRGINIA. Downloaded January 2011

Implementation of a Quality Management System for Aeronautical Information Services -1-

University of New England Compliance Management Framework and Procedures

June 2010 HEALTH, SAFETY, AND ENVIRONMENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (HSEMS)

Guide to the National Safety and Quality Health Service Standards for health service organisation boards

Quality Management Strategy

How To Protect Mental Health Information In Upb

POLICY. Number: Title: Enterprise Risk Management. Authorization

Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center-El Paso. Medical Equipment Management Plan

Oklahoma State Department of Health Protective Health Services Long Term Care Questions and Answers

INCIDENT POLICY Page 1 of 13 November 2015

Incident Response Improvement System (IRIS)

NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL SERVICES 11 NYCRR 82 (INSURANCE REGULATION 203) ENTERPRISE RISK MANAGEMENT AND OWN RISK AND SOLVENCY ASSESSMENT

DEPARTMENTAL DIRECTIVE

INSTITUTIONAL POLICY AND PROCEDURE (IPP) Department: Manual: Section:

POLICY & PROCEDURE FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF SERIOUS INCIDENTS

ODIG-AUD (ATTN: Audit Suggestions) Department of Defense Inspector General 400 Army Navy Drive (Room 801) Arlington, VA

DIT HEALTH AND SAFETY OFFICE

HSE s Corporate Plan for Internal Health & Safety for 2015/16

AS/NZS 4801:2001. Safety Management Systems (SMS) Self-Assessment Checklist. Revision 1 (January 2014)

How To Manage Health, Safety, Security And Environment

Major Unusual Incidents. Understanding the MUI Reporting System

WORKPLACE VIOLENCE PREVENTION. Definition. Definition Cont d. Health Care and Social Service Workers

ODP Certified Investigators Manual Pennsylvania Department of Public Welfare, Office of Developmental Programs

Edwin Lindsay Principal Consultant. Compliance Solutions (Life Sciences) Ltd, Tel: + 44 (0) elindsay@blueyonder.co.

* Use tag F224 for deficiencies concerning mistreatment, neglect, or misappropriation of resident property.

Ombudsman Program North Delta Planning & Development District Area Agency on Aging Elgalene Close, MSW District Ombudsman

AMENDMENT OF THE REGULATIONS OF THE COMMISSIONER OF EDUCATION. Pursuant to Education Law sections 101, 207, 3208, 3602, 4002, 4308, 4355,

Part 1 Overview of clinical governance Clinical governance the concept 1-3

MONTANA STATE HOSPITAL POLICY AND PROCEDURE ALLEGATIONS OF ABUSE OR NEGLECT

AN ANALYSIS OF ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORD-RELATED PATIENT SAFETY CONCERNS

Guidance for the Quality Assurance of Fire Protection Systems

HS307 Hazard & Incident Reporting Procedure

MAJOR PROJECTS CONSTRUCTION SAFETY STANDARD HS-09 Revision 0

Health, Safety and Environmental Management System

Magellan Behavioral Health of Pennsylvania, Inc. Incident Reporting Form Provider Instructions and Definitions

National Standards for the Protection and Welfare of Children

CRITICAL INCIDENT REPORTING POLICY DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES MEDICAL SERVICES DIVISION - MFP DN 533 (8-2008)

Incident reporting procedure

B o a r d of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. Supplemental Policy Statement on the. Internal Audit Function and Its Outsourcing

Standards for Investigating Child Abuse and Neglect (CA/N) Reports (Levels 1, 2, 3)

HSMS. Group Health AND Safety Management System

DRI WORKPLACE SAFETY PLAN (WSP)

Shell s Health, Safety and Environment (HSE) management system (see Figure 11-1) provides the framework for managing all aspects of the development.

Warrington Safeguarding Children Board Neglect Strategy

Risk Management Strategy

SAFETY and HEALTH MANAGEMENT STANDARDS

RISK MANAGEMENT STRATEGY

Managing EHS Incidents Using Integrated Managment Systems. By Matt Noth

Incident Reporting Policy

Elements of an Effective Health and Safety Program. Health and Safety Program Management Guidelines

Process for reporting and learning from serious incidents requiring investigation

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH. TRANSPARENCY AND QUALITY COMPACT MEASURES (voluntary indicators) GUIDE FOR CARE AND SUPPORT PROVIDERS

The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. Business Continuity Program

Transcription:

The Risk and Quality Management Program tool has been developed to assist providers to assess their internal Risk and Quality Management programs. The self-assessment is organized according to the major dimensions of risk and quality that have been defined in the document, Risk Management Program Best Practices. There are additional components to this self-assessment that are not included in the Best Practices document, such as the Roles and Responsibilities of Leadership. We have included them here because we believe they will help providers to better assess their programs and ultimately lead to more robust and successful risk and quality programs. It is our hope that every provider will use this tool to conduct an internal assessment, and that the result will be used as the basis for either developing or improving their risk and quality management programs. If you have questions or recommendations for additional tools, templates, training programs or other suggestions that you believe will assist providers to develop their internal risk and quality management programs, please send them to marion.greenfield@dbhds.virginia.gov.

Part I: Roles and Responsibilities of Leadership 1 Leadership establishes written priorities for the continuous assessment and improvement of the safety of residents and the quality of services and care provided. 2 Leadership communicates to staff the goal of creating and maintaining a culture of safety and quality throughout the organization. 3 Leadership provides opportunities for all employees from all levels of the organization to participate in safety and quality initiatives. 4 Leadership ensures that literature and advisories relevant to consumer care and services are communicated to all staff of the organization 5 Leadership defines in policy, procedures, or plans how residents and their families and authorized representatives can assist to identify and manage issues of safety and quality within the organization. 6 Leadership establishes expectations for collecting and using data and information about high-risk, highvolume, problem-prone processes to improve the safety and quality of care and services 7 Leadership has established procedures that describe the organization s approach to performance improvement and its capacity for change support a culture of safety and quality. 8 Leadership addresses the full range of safety issues, from potential or no-harm errors to hazardous conditions and sentinel events. Part II. Components of a Risk Management Program 9 The organization has a designated Risk Manager to address matters of risk and resident safety. The title of the individual may vary and the individual may serve more than one role within the organization. 10 The role of the Risk Manager includes the following: Develop the annual Risk Management Plan and Report Establish processes and structures to ensure that consumers, their families, and all staff are involved in the identification of risk. Ensure that measures are developed and data collection procedures are established and, to the extent possible, integrated into the existing work of staff who are responsible for collecting the data Ensure that there are processes to screen individuals to identify who is at risk of harm Establish processes and structures to review data, make recommendations or take action to address identified problems, and monitor the effectiveness of these actions. Initiate processes to ensure effective communication of risk, risk reduction strategies, and the effectiveness of risk reduction strategies. 11 The organization has an Incident Reporting System 12 The organization conducts an annual Risk Assessment 13 The organization implements a process for the ongoing Monitoring And Data Analysis of harm and potential harm to identify and promptly respond to risks to individuals. The organization conducts Root Cause Analyses of all serious incidents 2

14 The organization develops and routinely updates its Risk Management Plan 15 The organization conducts Mortality Reviews of all deaths. The organization conducts Life Safety Inspections Part III. Incident Reporting System 16 The definition of serious incident and serious injury has been communicated to all employees of the organization. 17 Policies or procedures are developed that define a serious incident and how a serious incident is to be reported and the consequences for the failure to report a serious incident. 18 The organization requires all new employees to complete event reporting training before the employee is assigned to work with individuals receiving services. 19 Event report training includes, when to complete an event report, how to complete an event report and failure to report a serious injury, serious incident, or near miss. 20 The organization reviews event data, at least annually, to identify risk trends and it takes actions to reduce risk. Part IV. Annual Risk Assessment 21 An organizational risk assessment is conducted at least annually and more frequently as needed. 22 The risk assessment specifically focuses on the identification of practices, situations and policies that could result in risk of harm to individuals being served before problems occur. 23 The risk assessment addresses the following: Safety inspections of the environment of care Clinical assessment/reassessment processes Staff competence Adequacy of staffing Adherence to regulatory requirements Use of high risk procedures, including seclusion and restraint Review of serious data, including near misses 24 The risk assessment results in actions to reduce the risk of harm to individuals receiving services 25 The organization has procedures for the dissemination to all staff of lessons learned from risk assessments. Part V. Ongoing Monitoring 26 The organization routinely reviews documentation to ensure that Clinical Assessments/Reassessments are completed per policies, procedures, and regulations and that actions are taken when risks are identified 27 The organization routinely reviews Individual Service Plans to ensure that identified risks are addressed in the individual s service plan 3

29 The organization reviews Medication events and near misses, whether or not they resulted in injury or illness. 28 The organization conducts routine reviews of High Risk Procedures, including the following: The use of seclusion and restraint. Peer-to-peer aggression Abuse and neglect allegations and findings. Trigger and Threshold events, as defined by the DBHDS. 30 For any risk data collection, the organization has a clearly articulated performance measure that is used to provide objective evidence of the degree to which a specific result is occurring over time. 31 Each performance measure is defined using the following framework that specifies how each measure will be constructed, reported, and used. A clear statement that defines what is to be measure. Define the attributes that are to be included in the measure as well as those that are to be excluded. Data collection methods and sources of data The frequency of measurement The performance goal or threshold Outcome (the results of the monitoring) Remedial actions and improvements taken as a result of the goal 32 Risk measures are defined in the Risk Management Plan 33 The organization, at a minimum, monitors the Triggers And Thresholds defined by the DBHDS and reports Triggers And Thresholds data to the DBHDS as required. 34 All data collection, including the qualitative review of records, is based on clearly defined and measurable review criteria 35 Risk data that is generated for individuals being served is reviewed by the individual s Support Team to identify the need to revise the individual service plan and/or take other actions to reduce risk. Part VI. Root Cause Analysis 36 The organization has a policy and procedures for when to conduct a Root Cause Analysis 37 The organization conducts a Root Cause Analysis of all serious incidents that resulted in or had the potential to result in permanent impairment to the individual 38 The organization conducts a Root Cause Analysis of all medication errors that resulted in or had the potential to result in permanent impairment to the individual 39 The organization documents the outcome of the Root Cause Analysis 40 The organization implements improvements to ensure that the risks associated with the identified causes are eliminated or mitigated 41 The organization monitors the improvements to ensure that change takes place and is sustained. Part VII. Risk Management Plan 4

42 The organization prepares an annual Risk Management Plan 43 The annual Risk Management Plan includes the following components: Processes used to identify and evaluate areas of risk, including risk assessment, routine reviews, and root cause analyses. The number and type of major events that occurred during the year Whether individuals receiving services and their families were informed of the events Assessment data from ongoing monitoring, event reports, and triggers and thresholds All actions taken during the previous year to improve safety, both proactively and in response to adverse events and risks identified in the Risk Management Plan Data that will be collected to assess the impact of actions taken on risk and to evaluate the sustainability of safety improvements Recommendations for new risk reduction initiatives for the coming year to reduce organizational and individual risk VII. Mortality Reviews 44 The organization reviews all deaths, whether expected or unexpected to identify opportunities to improve care and safety. 45 The Mortality Review function should include a nurse and, where possible at least one physician. 46 The organization compiles and reviews the following information, as applicable and available, during the mortality review: Medical records, including physician case notes and nurses notes Incident reports involving the deceased, for the 3 months preceding the death The most recent individualized service plan The most recent physical examination records A chronological narrative of the events leading to the individual s death Any evidence of maltreatment related to the death The death certificate and autopsy report, if available 47 The organization provides the DBHDS with all information related to the death, upon request. 48 The functions of the Mortality Review include the following: Conduct a focused review of each individual s death by examining and uncovering information about the individual s treatment and medical care and reconstructing the events that led to the final outcome. Facilitate the formulation of recommendations for practices and procedures to improve care and promote safety. Reaffirm existing practices and procedures in areas where no need for change can be identified. Part VIII: Taking Action and Sustaining Improvements 49 The organization defines in policy or in the Risk Management Plan: Who has the authority and responsibility to act on any data, review, event, or series of events that identifies a risk to an individual or individuals 5

Who is responsible for monitoring implementation and the effectiveness of actions intended to reduce the risk of harm How and to whom progress reports are submitted. Clearly defined timeframes for responsible individuals to communicate implementation progress reports to the Risk Manager and Leadership 50 Ongoing monitoring of improved processes and risk reduction includes at a minimum a threshold that must be met before monitoring may be discontinued 6