SOUND TRANSIT STAFF REPORT RESOLUTION NO. R2008-07 AND MOTION NO. M2008-64. ediscovery Application Suite Procurement & Implementation



Similar documents
SOUND TRANSIT STAFF REPORT MOTION NO. M Contract for ediscovery Application Suite Procurement & Implementation

SOUND TRANSIT STAFF REPORT MOTION NO. M Contract for ST Express Fleet Expansion

The Law On Discovery and Production of Electronic Evidence: Where Are We Now? Where Are We Going? Glenn A. Smith. June 10, 2009

3 "C" Words You Need to Know: Custody - Control - Cloud

Michigan's New E-Discovery Rules Provide Ways to Reduce the Scope and Burdens of E-Discovery

Any and all documents Meets Electronically Stored Information: Discovery in the Electronic Age

REALITY BYTES: A NEW ERA OF ELECTRONIC DISCOVERY

Department of Veterans Affairs VA Directive 6311 VA E-DISCOVERY

E-Discovery: The New Federal Rules of Civil Procedure A Practical Approach for Employers

Electronic Discovery and the New Amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure: A Guide For In-House Counsel and Attorneys

In-House Solutions to the E-Discovery Conundrum

New E-Discovery Rules: Is Your Company Prepared?

BEYOND THE HYPE: Understanding the Real Implications of the Amended Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. A Clearwell Systems White Paper

COURT OF QUEEN S BENCH OF MANITOBA PRACTICE DIRECTION GUIDELINES REGARDING DISCOVERY OF ELECTRONIC DOCUMENTS

University of Louisiana System

Xact Data Discovery. Xact Data Discovery. Xact Data Discovery. Xact Data Discovery. ediscovery for DUMMIES LAWYERS. MDLA TTS August 23, 2013

Solving Key Management Problems in Lotus Notes/Domino Environments

grouped into five different subject areas relating to: 1) planning for discovery and initial disclosures; 2)

E-DISCOVERY & PRESERVATION OF ELECTRONIC EVIDENCE. Ana Maria Martinez April 14, 2011

DISCOVERY OF ELECTRONICALLY-STORED INFORMATION IN STATE COURT: WHAT TO DO WHEN YOUR COURT S RULES DON T HELP

and ediscovery Peter Pepiton ediscovery Product Manager CA Information Governance

E-Discovery: New to California 1

FEDERAL PRACTICE. In some jurisdictions, understanding the December 1, 2006 Amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure is only the first step.

Archiving: Common Myths and Misconceptions

The Search Is On: State CIO Starting Points for E-Discovery

MEETING: DATE: TYPE OF ACTION: STAFF CONTACT: PHONE:

NightOwlDiscovery. EnCase Enterprise/ ediscovery Strategic Consulting Services

SEVENTH CIRCUIT ELECTRONIC DISCOVERY PILOT PROGRAM FOR DISCOVERY OF ELECTRONICALLY STORED

PROPOSED ELECTRONIC DATA DISCOVERY GUIDELINES FOR THE MARYLAND BUSINESS AND TECHONOLOGY CASE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM JUDGES

How To Write A Hit Report On A Lawsuit Against A Company

Electronic Discovery

How to Manage Costs and Expectations for Successful E-Discovery: Best Practices

Records Management Electronic Records and Electronic Discovery

E-Discovery for Paralegals: Definition, Application and FRCP Changes. April 27, 2007 IPE Seminar

Supreme Court Rule 201. General Discovery Provisions. (a) Discovery Methods.

Amendments to the Rules to Civil Procedure: Yours to E-Discover. Prepared by Christopher M. Bartlett Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP

E-Discovery in Michigan. Presented by Angela Boufford

Office of the Chief Information Officer

Reduce Cost and Risk during Discovery E-DISCOVERY GLOSSARY

Amendments to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. electronically stored information. 6 Differences from Paper Documents

Record Retention, ediscovery, Spoliation: Issues for In-House Counsel

NEW RULES FOR ELECTRONICALLY STORED INFORMATION

How To Write A Request For Information (Rfi)

Ten practical steps for streamlining e-discovery from a lawyer s perspective

THE 2015 FEDERAL E-DISCOVERY RULES AMENDMENTS

ediscovery and Information Governance Practice Overview

The Redgrave Roundtable. New Proposed Federal Discovery Rules: What They Say & What Is Next

GUIDELINES FOR USE OF THE MODEL AGREEMENT REGARDING DISCOVERY OF ELECTRONICALLY STORED INFORMATION

Article originally appeared in the Fall 2011 issue of The Professional Engineer

ANNUAL REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE ON DISCOVERY PROCEDURES TO THE ILLINOIS JUDICIAL CONFERENCE

Discovery Technology Group

Electronic Discovery: Litigation Holds, Data Preservation and Production

Procedure: Electronic Discovery

E-discovery Project Decision Guide

ediscovery: The New Information Management Battleground Developments in the Law and Best Practices

Electronic Discovery How can I be prepared? September 2010

This is not your grandfather s litigation. BUT. ediscovery Services are not legal services.

Rackspace Archiving Compliance Overview

Hong Kong High Court Procedure E-Discovery: Practice Direction Effective September 1, 2014

NLRB: NxGen Case Management, E-Government and E-Discovery

EXECUTIVE BRIEF SPON. Third-Party Archiving Solutions Are Still Needed in Exchange 2013 Environments. Published April 2015

Outlaw v. Willow Oral Argument Motions for Sanctions

E-discovery: Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and their Implications for Public Sector Corrections Departments

PROCEDURES TO PROTECT YOURSELF AND YOUR CLIENT

How To Preserve Records In Mississippi


Strategies for Preparing for E-Discovery

BPA Policy Information Governance & Lifecycle Management

Preservation of Separated Personnel s Electronically Stored Information Subject to Litigation Holds

E- Discovery in Criminal Law

DISCOVERY IN-HOUSE. Institute of Information Management 23 rd November 2010, Sydney. Graham Costello EMC

EPA Classification No.: CIO 2155-P-3.0 CIO Approval Date: 04/04/2014 CIO Transmittal No.: Review Date: 04/04/2017

Solving.PST Management Problems in Microsoft Exchange Environments

UNDERSTANDING E DISCOVERY A PRACTICAL GUIDE. 99 Park Avenue, 16 th Floor New York, New York

E-discovery The Basics: From Proportionality to Technology Assisted Review

CIVIL DISCOVERY STANDARDS* AUGUST 1999 [NOVEMBER 2003 DRAFT AMENDMENTS TO ELECTRONIC DISCOVERY STANDARDS]

ANALYSIS OF ORIGINAL BILL

10 Steps to Establishing an Effective Retention Policy

Understanding ediscovery and Electronically Stored Information (ESI)

How To Preserve Electronic Records

E-Discovery in Employment Litigation: Making Practical, Yet Defensible Decisions

Allison Stanton Director of E-Discovery U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division

Solution Brief. Archiving from Office 365 for Compliance and ediscovery. 1) Capture Everything

Proactively Using Information Governance and Advance Planning to Reduce the Burden and Expense of E-Discovery

E-Discovery Best Practices

E-Discovery and Data Management. Managing Litigation in the Digital Age. Attorney Advertising

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DIVISION. v. Case No. [MODEL] ORDER REGARDING E-DISCOVERY IN PATENT CASES

CMA Shipping Ethics and E-Discovery in Shipping Disputes

COURSE DESCRIPTION AND SYLLABUS LITIGATING IN THE DIGITAL AGE: ELECTRONIC CASE MANAGEMENT ( ) Fall 2014

Federal Rule Changes Affecting E-Discovery Are Almost Here - Are You Ready This Time?

ELECTRONIC DISCOVERY. Dawn M. Curry

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION. Case No. 5:07-CV-231-F

A Brief Overview of ediscovery in California

7. Judicial Case Management and Training

Archiving Benefits

Discussion of Electronic Discovery at Rule 26(f) Conferences: A Guide for Practitioners

Allison Stanton, Director of E-Discovery U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division. U.S. Department of Agriculture

Assembly Bill No. 5 CHAPTER 5

Turning the Tide The Need for E-Discovery Education

Transcription:

SOUND TRANSIT STAFF REPORT RESOLUTION NO. R2008-07 AND MOTION NO. M2008-64 ediscovery Application Suite Procurement & Implementation Meeting: Date: Type of Action: Staff Contacts: Phone: Finance Committee 7/3/08 Discussion/Possible Action to Recommend Board Approval Desmond Brown, General Counsel (206) 398-5017 Board (R2008-07 only) 7/10/08 Action Kevin Crawford, CIO (206) 398-5137 Contract/Agreement Type: Requested Action: Using other Agency Competitive Contracts Execute New Contract/Agreement Sole Source Amend Existing Contract/Agreement Agreement with Other Jurisdiction(s) Amendment PROJECT NAME ediscovery Application Suite Implementation PROPOSED ACTION Resolution No. R2008-07 (1) Amends the 2008 Administrative Capital lifetime and annual budget to provide an additional $715,000 to procure Recommind Suite, software and related implementation services that will allow Sound Transit to meet state and federal electronic discovery and document preservation requirements. (2) Amends the 2008 Agency Staff budget to add $100,000 to the FIT department for maintenance of the Recommind Suite and associated infrastructure. Motion No. M2008-64 Authorizes the chief executive officer to execute a contract with Recommind for the purchase of the Recommind ediscovery Suite software and related implementation and maintenance services for an electronic discovery and email archiving solution for a total authorized contract amount not to exceed $715,000, contingent upon Board approval of Resolution No. R2008-07. KEY FEATURES of PROPOSED ACTION An electronic discovery and document preservation solution is necessary for the Legal and IT departments to meet state and federal requirements. An electronic discovery solution will enable Sound Transit to: store and retrieve electronically stored information (ESI) from the current network environment; implement a legal hold on ESI as required by law; electronically identify and retrieve ESI responsive to discovery or public disclosure requests;

manage and prepare the retrieved ESI for a legal case or public records act request; and deliberately archive email and other critical documents in accordance with adopted retention policies and within a planned storage architecture, which further facilitates retrieval of discoverable information. The suite includes: electronic discovery support, electronic legal hold capabilities, case management, email archiving, and electronic data collection services. In order to fund the proposed action, staff is requesting that: The lifetime and annual Administrative Capital budget be increased by $715,000 to fund the acquisition of the Recommind Suite and associated infrastructure, and The agency staff budget be increased by $100,000 to fund maintenance of the system for the remainder of 2008. BUDGET and FINANCIAL PLAN DISCUSSION Resolution No. R2008-07 The Adopted for Administrative Capital includes $1.317 million for expenditures in 2008, and a lifetime budget of $23.668 million. The budget for 2008 is already committed for other current projects. The Administrative Capital budget can be seen on page 226 of the Adopted 2008 book. The acquisition of $100,000 for computer equipment and $615,000 for computer software would be funded by an increase of $715,000 to the Administrative Capital program budget, which will increase the lifetime budget to $24,443,000; and the program budget for 2008 to $2,032,000. Maintenance for the system (approximately $100,000) will be covered by an increase within FIT Staff Operating. The proposed action would increase the Agency adopted staff budget to $60,716,651. The agency staff budget can be seen on page 178 of the Adopted 2008 book. Funding for these budget amendments will come from the Regional Fund, which is funded proportionally from each subarea. Use of these funds will reduce future agency resources by $815,000. Motion No. M2008-64 This action also authorizes the chief executive officer to execute a contract with Recommind for the purchase of the Recommind ediscovery Suite software and related implementation and maintenance services for an electronic discovery and email archiving solution for a total authorized contract amount not to exceed $715,000. Of this contract amount, $615,000 will be funded through the Administrative Capital program for software and $100,000 from the FIT staff budget for maintenance. Infrastructure needed to support the software at a cost of approximately $100,000 will be procured through other pre-existing authorized sources. Resolution No. R2008-07 and Motion No. M2008-64 Page 2 of 5

BUDGET TABLE Proposed Amendment to the 2008 Sound Transit ($000) 001 Agency Administration 2008 Annual Lifetime Cost Elements Increase Revised Increase Revised Office Furniture $ - $ 2,271 $ - $ 2,271 Fleet - Automobiles $ 90 $ 90 $ 1,120 $ - $ 1,120 Computer Equipment $ 162 $ 100 $ 262 $ 4,657 $ 100 $ 4,757 ERP System $ - $ 4,432 $ - $ 4,432 Computer Software $ 1,023 $ 615 $ 1,638 $ 3,570 $ 615 $ 4,185 Other Office Equipment $ 43 $ 43 $ 725 $ - $ 725 Unallocated $ - $ 6,892 $ - $ 6,892 Total $ 1,317 $ 715 $ 2,032 $ 23,668 $ 715 $ 24,383 Agency Staff 2008 Annual Increase Revised Sound Transit Staff Operations $ 60,612 $ 100 $ 60,712 M/W/DBE SMALL BUSINESS PARTICIPATION Prime Consultant/Contractor Recommind is the prime consultant for this contract. Recommind is a small business, and will self-perform all work under the contract. EEO Commitment Recommind has 91 total employees, of which 12 (13%) are women (one executive) and 21 (23%) are minorities. PROJECT DESCRIPTION and BACKGROUND for PROPOSED ACTION Pursuant to the Washington Public Records Act (RCW 42.56 et seq.), the discovery obligations imposed by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and Sound Transit s record retention policy, Sound Transit must have the ability to do all of the following with regards to electronically stored information (ESI): Identify and categorize all ESI to be preserved; Store and preserve ESI; Locate and identify responsive ESI across all applications in response to litigation discovery or public records requests; Produce responsive documents in native format as well as other industry-standard formats; Delete documents in accordance with Sound Transit s document retention policy; Institute a legal hold on all forms of ESI across all electronic platforms; and Demonstrate compliance with the agency s document retention policy. These obligations apply equally to Public Records Act requests and discovery requests due to litigation. However, while discovery-intensive litigation cannot be predicted with certainty, Sound Transit receives about 140 public disclosure requests per year, and this number is likely to increase. Because of this volume of requests, the ever-increasing volume of electronic data, Resolution No. R2008-07 and Motion No. M2008-64 Page 3 of 5

and the increasingly cumbersome and broad nature of many of the requests, it is no longer efficient or even effective to manually locate, search, and identify potentially responsive electronic documents. In the absence of software that can automatically search across all electronic platforms, this searching and reviewing of documents would have to be done manually by staff, in addition to their normal workloads. As requests become broader and the volume of electronically stored information increases, an increasingly onerous burden is placed on staff. It is further exacerbated when staff leave Sound Transit at the completion of a project or otherwise, and this burden then falls on other staff having to locate and review electronically stored information that was created by other employees. After a detailed review and interview process of various ediscovery providers by members of the IT and Legal Departments, Sound Transit staff determined that the proposed suite of products by Recommind represented the best value to Sound Transit in terms of functionality, as well as cost. It is capable of facilitating Sound Transit s compliance with all of the above requirements. Staff also compared what other local governments (e.g., Port of Seattle, City of Seattle, King County, and local PUD s) in the state are doing with regards to ESI, and concluded that the Recommind software is the best value for the agency. Significantly, the Recommind product appears to be the only one that can efficiently and effectively implement a legal hold across all ESI a requirement that already exists and has resulted in several high-profile (and monetarily significant) sanctions in courts across the country for failure to comply. Specifically the software has the following features: the ability to easily find relevant information across the entire organization s electronic records regardless of format (it supports over 150 file formats); enables staff to create, manage and organize electronically stored records before and during litigation; automatically search for and assess document responsiveness, privilege and issue relation before the manual review process begins, drastically reducing the amount of time required to organize and conduct document review and analysis while simultaneously increasing review accuracy and consistency; delivers up to 500 percent in storage savings over traditional e-mail archiving systems while substantially reducing litigation and discovery risk; intelligently and cost-effectively tackle records management, Information Lifecycle Management (ILM) and email archiving with a single product; and deduplicates all information to the lowest unique subpart resulting in substantial storage savings. The Recommind ediscovery suite of products was selected through the U.S General Services Administration s procedures. CONSEQUENCES of DELAY Delay in the approval of this action could result in the loss of a $60,000 discount in the initial license fee. The requested contract amount indicated above includes the discount. PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT Not applicable to this action. Resolution No. R2008-07 and Motion No. M2008-64 Page 4 of 5

ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE SSK 6-30-08 LEGAL REVIEW LGA 6-30-08 Resolution No. R2008-07 and Motion No. M2008-64 Page 5 of 5