ALBERTA SECURITIES COMMISSION SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND UNDERTAKING



Similar documents
ALBERTA SECURITIES COMMISSION SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND UNDERTAKING

IN THE MATTER OF THE SECURITIES ACT R.S.O. 1990, c. S.5, AS AMENDED -AND- IN THE MATTER OF SYSTEMATECH SOLUTIONS INC., APRIL VUONG AND HAO QUACH

ALBERTA SECURITIES COMMISSION NOTICE OF HEARING. Citation: Re Edmundson, 2015 ABASC 938 Date: Docket: ENF

The Mortgage Brokerages and Mortgage Administrators Regulations

ALBERTA SECURITIES COMMISSION. IN THE MATTER OF the Securities Act R.S.A. 2000, c. S-4. Citation: Robert, Re, 2007 ABASC 447 Date:

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

CLEARING AND SETTLEMENT SYSTEMS BILL

State of California Department of Corporations

CALIFORNIA CAPITAL INVESTORS, LLC (a Delaware Limited Liability Company) SUBSCRIPTION AGREEMENT

THE OFFERING MEMORANDUM UNDER ONTARIO SECURITIES LAW By: Daniel A. Coderre Soloway Wright LLP

Applicant any person who is applying or has applied for registration as a Paralegal;

In the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia Atlanta Division

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

STATE OF NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND INDUSTRY DIVISION OF MORTGAGE LENDING * * * STIPULATED SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

IN THE MATTER OF A DISCIPLINARY HEARING PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 20 AND 24 OF BY-LAW NO. 1 OF THE MUTUAL FUND DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Before the SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Fitness and Probity Standards (Code issued under Section 50 of the Central Bank Reform Act 2010)

APPROVED Movant shall serve copies of this ORDER on

SUMMARY OF THE CFPB NOTICE

Case 1:14-cv RMC Document 65-8 Filed 09/30/14 Page 1 of 10 EXHIBIT G

CAYMAN ISLANDS. Supplement No. 1 published with Gazette No. 22 of 22nd October, MUTUAL FUNDS LAW (2012 REVISION)

Case Document 32 Filed in TXSB on 03/24/06 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

IRS Administrative Appeals Process Procedures

Singapore Diamond Investment Exchange Pte Ltd SDiX Depository Pte Ltd Application for Membership -- Approved Supplier

The Limited Partnership Bill, 2010 THE LIMITED LIABILITY PARTNERSHIP BILL 2010 ARRANGEMENT OF CLAUSES PART I PRELIMINARY. Clause

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING BEFORE THE SECURITIES COMMISSIONER OF MARYLAND CONSENT ORDER

FINRA Issues Regulatory Notice Reminding Broker-Dealers of their Obligation to Conduct Reasonable Investigations in Regulation D Offerings

Financial Services (Banking Reform) Act 2013

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

INTERNATIONAL COLLECTIVE INVESTMENT SCHEMES LAW

TRANSFER OF STRUCTURED SETTLEMENT PAYMENT RIGHTS

FINRA-Broker Dealer Investment Banking Due Diligence

Broker agreement (Group Insurance & Group Annuities)

reg Doc Filed 04/23/12 Entered 04/23/12 15:12:23 Main Document Pg 1 of 6

Guidelines on Fit and Proper Criteria for Insurance Undertakings

PARTNERSHIPS ACT LAWS OF KENYA. No. 16 of 2012

Real Estate Errors & Omissions Indemnity Plan

Trust and Loan Companies Act

(28 February 2014 to date) LONG-TERM INSURANCE ACT 52 OF 1998

STATE OF FLORIDA OFFICE OF FINANCIAL REGULATION

AGREED STATEMENT OF FACTS

INVESTMENT ADVISER REPRESENTATIVE AGREEMENT

Private Capital Solutions. Tax-Free Savings Accounts (TFSA) Registered Retirement Savings Plans (RRSP)

Annex A6. Form F5 Personal Information Form and Authorization to Collect, Use and Disclose Personal Information

Discipline Notice GLOBAL SECURITIES CORPORATION. December 3, 2007 DN Suggested Routing Trading Legal and Compliance

Licensing of certain nonpublic post-secondary educational institutions.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Criminal No.:

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING BEFORE THE SECURITIES COMMISSIONER OF MARYLAND CONSENT ORDER

Return completed applications to: APAC-Texas, Inc. P.O. Box Beaumont, TX (409) Phone (409) Fax

TICKETMASTER SINGLE EVENT TICKETING AGREEMENT. Ticketmaster NZ Limited. ( Ticketmaster ) and. ( Client )

Professional Indemnity Select

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING BEFORE THE SECURITIES COMMISSIONER OF MARYLAND WOLVERINE ENERGY, L.L.C., * FILE NO

GENERAL AGENT AGREEMENT

LOAN AGREEMENT. (The City of Elk Grove Small Business Loan Program)

ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE COMMERCIAL LIST

2. The Enforcement Department of IIROC has conducted an investigation ( the Investigation ) into the conduct of Mondal.

General Conditions for Loans reference No.: General Terms and Conditions for Loans dated 1 March 2016

PENNSYLVANIA SUNSHINE ACT 65 Pa.C.S.A This chapter shall be known and may be cited as the Sunshine Act.

Main Securities Market LISTING RULES. and Admission to Trading Rules

LLOYD'S OF LONDON ARCHITECTS/ENGINEERS PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY CLAIMS MADE AND REPORTED INSURANCE POLICY NOTICE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CONSENT JUDGMENT

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT. b. The terms of any settlement will become public information only if, and when, the settlement is approved by the Commission.

Rules Notice Guidance Note Dealer Member Rules. Client Relationship Model Guidance INTRODUCTION

State of California - Department of Corporations

VIRGIN ISLANDS INSOLVENCY PRACTITIONERS REGULATIONS, 2004 ARRANGEMENT OF REGULATIONS

Loan Agreement (Short Form)

COMPANION POLICY CP REGISTRATION REQUIREMENTS AND EXEMPTIONS. Table of Contents

Queensland building work enforcement guidelines

INVESTORS RIGHTS. a Schedule III bank, meaning an authorized foreign bank named in Schedule III of the Bank Act (Canada);

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING BEFORE THE MARYLAND SECURITIES COMMISSIONER * * * * * * * * * * * * * ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

Determining Tax Liability Under Section 505(a) of the Bankruptcy Code

Supplement No. 5 published with Gazette No. 15 of 20th July, MUTUAL FUNDS LAW. (2009 Revision)

Chapter 3 Financial Year

Mauritius Investment Funds

SCHEDULE A ACCREDITED INVESTOR STATUS CERTIFICATE

CHAPTER 454M MORTGAGE SERVICERS

LIMITED LIABILITY PARTNERSHIP ACT

HSHS BUSINESS ASSOCIATE AGREEMENT BACKGROUND AND RECITALS

In order to avoid the delay and expense of further proceedings and to promote the best

BEFORE YOU INVEST IN A PROMISSORY NOTE SECURED BY AN INTEREST IN REAL PROPERTY, YOU SHOULD KNOW

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA, TAMPA DIVISION

GUIDANCE FOR MEMBERS CREDITORS COMMITTEES IN BANKRUPTCY

2016 No. 696 ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS. The Electronic Identification and Trust Services for Electronic Transactions Regulations 2016

PRACTICE NOTE: LAWYER FOR THE CHILD: CODE OF CONDUCT

B.C. LAWYERS COMPULSORY PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY INSURANCE POLICY NUMBER: LPL

Transcription:

ALBERTA SECURITIES COMMISSION SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND UNDERTAKING Citation: Keystone Real Estate Investment Corp., 2008 ABASC 452 Date: 20080722 Docket: E/03748 Securities Act, R.S.A. 2000, c. S-4 (Act Keystone Real Estate Investment Corp., Ron Cadman and Travis Cadman Agreed Facts Introduction 1. The staff of the Alberta Securities Commission (respectively, Staff and Commission conducted an investigation into allegations that Keystone Real Estate Investment Corp. (Keystone, Ron Cadman and Travis Cadman (collectively, Cadmans breached Alberta securities laws by making misrepresentations to the public in Keystone s advertising materials, during its investment seminars, and in two offering memoranda, by acting as advisors or permitting other Keystone representatives to act as advisors despite the fact that none of them was registered to act in that capacity, and by failing to make certain filings within the requisite time frames. 2. The investigation confirmed and each of Keystone and the Cadmans (collectively, Respondents admits that they breached those sections of the Act referred to in this Settlement Agreement and Undertaking (Agreement, and that each acted contrary to the public interest. 3. Solely for securities regulatory purposes in Alberta and elsewhere, and as the basis for the settlement and undertaking referred to in paragraphs 35 to 37 of this Agreement, each of the Respondents agree to the facts and consequences set out in this Agreement. 4. Terms used in this Agreement have the same meaning as provided in Alberta securities laws, a defined term in the Act. Parties 5. The Cadmans are residents of Alberta. At all material times, the Cadmans were the sole directors of Keystone and responsible for its management. The Cadmans 2945336 v3

- 2 - have never been registered in any capacity with the Executive Director of the Commission (Executive Director. 6. At all material times, Keystone was a corporation registered to do business in Alberta, with its head office in Red Deer, Alberta. It was not a reporting issuer in Alberta and was not registered in any capacity with the Executive Director. 7. 50% of Keystone s shares were owned by 744988 Alberta Ltd. (100% of the shares of which were owned by Ron Cadman, and the other 50% of Keystone s shares were owned by Cadman Investments Ltd. (100% of the shares of which were owned by Travis Cadman. 8. At all material times, the Respondents marketed investment opportunities and sold the securities of a number of different companies involved in real estate development to Alberta investors, including Lake House Capital Ltd., Lake House Investments Ltd., Keystone Communities Ltd., and Diamond Key Capital Corporation. 9. At all material times, Lake House Capital Ltd. and Lake House Investments Ltd. were corporations registered to do business in Alberta. The sole officers and directors of both Lake House Capital Ltd. and Lake House Investments Ltd. were Travis Cadman (president and Ron Cadman (vice-president. Neither Lake House Capital Ltd. nor Lake House Investments Ltd. were reporting issuers in Alberta, nor were they registered in any capacity with the Executive Director. 10. At all material times, Keystone Communities Ltd. and Diamond Key Capital Corporation were also corporations registered to do business in Alberta. The sole officers and directors of Keystone Communities Ltd. were Ron Cadman (president and Travis Cadman (vice-president. The sole officers and directors of Diamond Key Capital Corporation were Travis Cadman (president and Ron Cadman (vice-president. Neither Keystone Communities Ltd. nor Diamond Key Capital Corporation were reporting issuers in Alberta, nor were they registered in any capacity with the Executive Director. Circumstances Misrepresentations - Claimed Past Projects 11. Keystone claimed, in its print advertising, on its website and during investment seminars offered to the public, to have previously successfully completed at least 13 real estate development projects (collectively, Claimed Past Projects, and referenced substantial offerings in and investor returns from those Claimed Past Projects. 12. The Claimed Past Projects included:

- 3-12.1 Rustler Holdings (Sylvan Lake, Alberta, 2006; 12.2 Maui Land Syndication #1 and #2 (Maui, Hawaii, 2005; 12.3 two Springbank Land Syndications (Calgary, Alberta, 1988; 12.4 Desert Sky (Phoenix, Arizona, 2003; 12.5 Desert Sands (Phoenix, Arizona, 2002; 12.6 Diamond Key Capital Fund (Central Alberta, 2006; 12.7 Venu (Red Deer, Alberta, 2006; 12.8 Edmonton Apartment Syndication (Edmonton, Alberta, 2002; 12.9 Quadra Townhomes (Victoria, B.C., 2001; 12.10 Park Place Condos & Town Homes (Victoria, B.C., 2004; and 12.11 Davenport Project (Red Deer, Alberta, 2003. 13. None of the Claimed Past Projects were actually completed by or participated in by Keystone. However, the Cadmans were personally involved in various capacities in the Claimed Past Projects. Misrepresentations - Offering Memoranda 14. Commencing in or about May 2007, Keystone sold securities in its Lake House project, a resort development to be constructed in the Sylvan Lake area of Alberta (Lake House Project Securities. Approximately 400 investors invested $8,000,000 in Lake House Project Securities. 15. The Lake House Project Securities were offered for sale to the public pursuant to two offering memoranda, both dated May 25, 2007. One offering memorandum was in the name of Lake House Capital Ltd. (OM 1, and the other offering memorandum was in the name of Lake House Investments Ltd. (OM 2. 16. Section 3.3 of OM 1 stated: There are no penalties or sanctions that have been in effect during the last ten (10 years against an Officer, Director or control person of the Corporation or against a company of which any of the foregoing was an Officer, Director or control person. No declaration of bankruptcy, voluntary assignment in bankruptcy, proposal under any bankruptcy or insolvency legislation, proceedings, arrangement

- 4 - or compromise with creditors or appointment of a receiver, receiver manager or trustee to hold assets, has been in effect during the last ten (10 years with regard to those individuals or any companies of which those individuals was an Officer, Director or control person at that time. 17. Section 3.3 of OM 2 stated: There are no penalties or sanctions that have been in effect during the last ten (10 years against a Director, Officer or control person of the Corporation or against a company of which any of the foregoing was a Director, Officer or control person. No declaration of bankruptcy, voluntary assignment in bankruptcy, proposal under any bankruptcy or insolvency legislation, proceedings, arrangement or compromise with creditors or appointment of a receiver, receiver manager or trustee to hold assets, has been in effect during the last ten (10 years with regard to those individuals or any companies of which any of those individuals was a Director, Officer or control person at that time. 18. As the directors, officers and promoters of Lake House Capital Ltd. and Lake House Investments Ltd., the Cadmans signed certificates dated May 25, 2007 which appeared at the end of both OM 1 and OM 2 (OM Certificates. The OM Certificates stated that OM 1 and OM 2 did not contain a misrepresentation. 19. The Cadmans declared bankruptcy in September 1997 and were not discharged until September 22, 1998, making the representations described above inaccurate. Advising Without Registration 20. At all material times, Keystone and certain Keystone representatives, including the Cadmans, held themselves out as being in the business of providing investment advice. 21. Keystone s website: 21.1 invited members of the public to Investment Seminars, at which they could Learn to Invest with Confidence ; 21.2 stated, Experienced both as real estate developers and investment advisors, our dedicated team aims to deliver intelligent investment solutions that satisfy each clients [sic] risk-return requirements ; and

- 5-21.3 in its careers section, invited applicants to apply for positions as Investment Advisors, and did not stipulate that any particular credentials, education or registration were required. 22. In addition, Keystone s advertising materials spoke generally of investment opportunities available through Keystone. Its brochures contained statements such as: 22.1 Our clients invest confidently, knowing Keystone is lead by experts who are wholly dedicated to creating, preserving and managing their personal wealth. 22.2 Investment options range extensively so clients can be expertly matched with the opportunity best suited for their current and future financial situation. 22.3 Our expert Wealth Builder s [sic] work closely with each investor to ensure their specific financial goals are properly understood, crafted and met. Individual risk-return requirements are carefully weighed to perfectly tailor a personalized wealth-building path designed to build a powerful financial future through real estate investments. 23. Keystone representatives identified themselves to prospective investors as Keystone advisors, and provided general information with respect to the benefits of adding real estate to investment portfolios. 24. Keystone also enrolled members, who received advance notice of future investment opportunities and monthly newsletters, and had access to both the Investors Corner on the Keystone website and a designated Investor Relations Manager. 25. At all material times, neither Keystone nor the Cadmans or any other Keystone representatives were registered with the Executive Director to act as advisors. Filing Deficiencies 26. OM 1 and OM 2 were not filed with the Commission within 10 days of the distribution under the OMs. 27. Keystone Communities Ltd. s offering memorandum dated Oct. 25, 2005 (Keystone Communities OM and Diamond Key Capital Corporation s offering memorandum dated June 1, 2006 (Diamond Key OM, were also not filed with the Commission within 10 days of the distribution under those offering memoranda.

- 6-28. Reports of Exempt Distribution applicable to Keystone Communities Ltd. and Diamond Key Capital Corporation distributions occurring between January 10, 2006, and September 11, 2006, were not filed with the Commission within 10 days of the distributions. Breaches 29. As a result of the conduct outlined above, the Respondents admit that they breached: 29.1 sub-section 92(4.1 of the Act by making misrepresentations with respect to the Claimed Past Projects in Keystone s advertising materials, including on Keystone s website and during investment seminars offered to the public; and 29.2 sub-section 75(1(b of the Act by acting or permitting other Keystone representatives to act as advisors when they were not registered to act in that capacity. 30. As a result of the conduct outlined above, the Cadmans admit that they breached: 30.1 sub-section 92(4.1 of the Act by causing Lake House Capital Ltd. and Lake House Investments Ltd. to make misrepresentations in OM 1 and OM 2; 30.2 section 2.9 of National Instrument 45-106 (NI 45-106 by: 30.2.1 signing false certificates certifying that OM 1 and OM 2 did not contain a misrepresentation at the time of signing and at the date they were delivered to purchasers of the security sold; 30.2.2 failing to cause Lake House Capital Ltd. and Lake House Investments Ltd. to file OM 1 and OM 2 with the Commission within 10 days of the distributions; and 30.2.3 failing to cause Keystone Communities Ltd. and Diamond Key Capital Corporation to file the Keystone Communities OM and the Diamond Key OM with the Commission within 10 days of the distributions; and 30.3 section 6.1 of NI 45-106 by failing to cause Keystone Communities Ltd. and Diamond Key Capital Corporation to file Reports of Exempt Distribution applicable to distributions occurring between January 10, 2006 and September 11, 2006 with the Commission within 10 days of the distributions.

- 7-31. The Respondents acknowledge that their failure to comply with Alberta securities laws as outlined above was conduct contrary to the public interest. Other Circumstances Relevant to Settlement 32. In the Keystone Communities OM and the Diamond Key OM ultimately filed with the Commission, reference was made to the Cadmans bankruptcies. 33. The Respondents have taken steps, including obtaining legal guidance, promptly removing contravening advertising material and making all delinquent filings, to rectify the breaches of Alberta securities laws outlined above and prevent future breaches. 34. The Respondents have not been previously sanctioned by the Commission and have cooperated fully with Staff during the investigation. 35. The Commission has not received any complaints from Keystone investors with respect to the Respondents conduct. 36. This Agreement has saved the Commission the time and expense associated with further investigation and a contested hearing under the Act. Settlement Payments and Undertakings 37. Based on these facts and admissions, Keystone agrees to pay upon execution of this Agreement the amount of $50,000.00 to the Commission in settlement of the allegations against it. 38. Based on these facts and admissions, each of the Cadmans: 38.1 agrees to pay upon execution of this Agreement the amount of $100,000.00 to the Commission in settlement of the allegations against them; and 38.2 undertakes to the Executive Director to resign all positions that each holds as a director or officer of any issuer, and refrain from becoming or acting as a director or officer (or both of any issuer for a period of two (2 years from the date of this Agreement. 39. Based on these facts and admissions, the Respondents jointly and severally agree to pay upon execution of this Agreement the amount of $10,000.00 to the Commission towards the costs of the investigation of this matter. Administration 40. The Respondents waive any rights existing under the Act, or otherwise, to a further hearing, review, judicial review or appeal of this matter.

- 8-41. The Respondents acknowledge that this Agreement may be referred to in any other proceedings under the Act. 42. This Agreement resolves all issues involving the Respondents as described in the preceding paragraphs, and Staff will take no further steps against the Respondents arising from these facts. 43. This Agreement may be executed in counterpart. Signed by Keystone Real Estate Investment Corp. at Red Deer, Alberta, this 18 th day of July, 2008, in the presence of: Elsa-May Pye WITNESS NAME SIGNATURE Keystone Real Estate Investment Corp. Signed by Ron Cadman at Red Deer, Alberta, this 18 th day of July, 2008, in the presence of: Elsa-May Pye WITNESS NAME SIGNATURE Ron Cadman Signed by Travis Cadman at Red Deer, Alberta, this 18 th day of July, 2008, in the presence of: Elsa-May Pye WITNESS NAME SIGNATURE Travis Cadman

- 9 - Calgary, Alberta, this 22 nd day of July, 2008 ALBERTA SECURITIES COMMISSION David Linder Executive Director