Network Requirements for DSL systems, (ADSL through G.Fast) (A summarized view)



Similar documents
Public Switched Telephone System

What are the Requirements for an Accurate DSL Line Simulator? Paradyne International, France

COMMITTEE T1 TELECOMMUNICATIONS Working Group T1E1.4 (DSL Access) Ottawa, Canada; June 7, 1999

Optimal Transmit Spectra for Communication on Digital Subscriber Lines

Introduction to Digital Subscriber s Line (DSL)

Evaluation Criteria for ADSL AFE1302

Characterization of a new copper cable for next generation DSL systems

Detecting Bridged Tap and Noise Interference in VDSL2 Access Networks using the JDSU SmartClass TPS

How Enhanced DSL Technologies Optimize the Last Copper Mile By John Williams

COMMITTEE T1 TELECOMMUNICATIONS Working Group T1E1.4 (DSL Access) Costa Mesa, California, March 8 12, 1999

VDSL2 LAN Extender User Manual

Digital Subscriber Line (DSL) Transmission Methods

V101. VDSL LAN Extender

TELECOMMUNICATIONS STANDARDS ADVISORY COMMITTEE WORKING GROUP ON COMMON CONNECTION STANDARDS (CCS)

Optimal Signaling Strategies for Symmetric and Asymmetric Bit-Rate Communication Services in the Presence of Crosstalk

Next Generation of High Speed. Modems8

Voice Grade Copper. Characteristics, problems and spectral management. EFM July, 2001 Hugh Barrass (Cisco Systems) With Thanks to:

VDSL2 A feasible Solution for Last Mile

Adaptive Spectrum and Signal Alignment, Incorporated THE RE-PROFILER DSM CLOSES THE CASE ON DIAGNOSING DSL/VDSL TROUBLES

SERIES L: CONSTRUCTION, INSTALLATION AND PROTECTION OF CABLES AND OTHER ELEMENTS OF OUTSIDE PLANT

VDSL: The Next Step in the DSL Progression

Module: Digital Communications. Experiment 784. DSL Transmission. Institut für Nachrichtentechnik E-8 Technische Universität Hamburg-Harburg

Chapter 1. Introduction. 1.1 Research Motivation and Objective

An Analysis of Speed Drop in ADSL Lines in Sri Lanka

The effect of temperature on the bandwidth of telecommunications cabling in commercial buildings. Focus on the IBDN System 4800LX from NORDX/CDT

1. (Ungraded) A noiseless 2-kHz channel is sampled every 5 ms. What is the maximum data rate?

UltraFED IIB. 30 MHz Far-End Device

Broadband 101: Installation and Testing

APPLICATION NOTE 182 WIDEBAND TESTING. Telecom Test and Measurement. The Need for Speed

Data Transmission. Data Communications Model. CSE 3461 / 5461: Computer Networking & Internet Technologies. Presentation B

Intel System Engineers Documents. DSL General Overview

: Instructor

(Refer Slide Time: 2:10)

Evolution from Voiceband to Broadband Internet Access

Proposal: Option for in-band POTS and ISDN. Mikael Isaksson, Tomas Stefansson, Per Ödling, Frank Sjöberg, Kate Wilson

V-DSL technology in the NBN

How DSL Works. by Curt Franklin

The Effect of Network Cabling on Bit Error Rate Performance. By Paul Kish NORDX/CDT

MR-257 An Overview of G Vectoring

During class please switch off your mobile, pager or other that may interrupt.

Broadcast digital subscriber lines using discrete multitone for broadband access

Ethernet over VDSL2 PoE PD Converter

EFM Copper (EFMC) Tutorial. June 2004

xdsl Technology and Applications:

LevelOne User Manual VDS-0120 Ethernet over VDSL2 Converter (PSE)

HDSL Basics. HDSL Basics. Introduction. HDSL Overview

Breathing New Life into Copper: The Long Awaited Arrival of VDSL2

Performance and Limitations of VDSL2-based Next Generation Access Networks

DSL Calculator. 2. Starting the DSL Calculator

FURTHER READING: As a preview for further reading, the following reference has been provided from the pages of the book below:

Broadband access. Nils Holte, NTNU. NTNU Department of Telecommunications Kursdagene ved NTNU, Digitale telenett, 9. januar

At what line speed do modems initialise? (1) Operator Controlled Mode (RA mode 1)

The Next Generation of Cable Technology. A technology primer from NORDX/CDT By, Eric d Allmen

RADIO FREQUENCY INTERFERENCE AND CAPACITY REDUCTION IN DSL

DSL: An Overview. By M. V. Ramana Murthy. All Rights Reserved

Orion2+ SHDSL.bis Solution with 11Mbit/s and 15Mbit/s per Copper Pair

Digital Subscriber Line (DSL)

INTRODUCTION TO DSL CHAPTER THE TELEPHONE LOOP PLANT. 1.1 The Telephone Loop Plant. 1.2 DSL Reference Model. 1.3 The Family of DSL Technologies

ADSL2 AND ADSL2plus THE NEW ADSL STANDARDS

Copper Testing for ADSL/2/2+ Qualification and troubleshooting of the local loop

CONTRIBUTION ABSTRACT

Dynatel Advanced Modular System 965AMS 30-Megahertz Spectrum Analyzer

Chapter 9 Using Telephone and Cable Networks for Data Transmission

XDSL TECHNIQUES FOR POWER LINE COMMUNICATIONS

Black Box Explains: DSL

Deutsche Telekom Super FTTC. The Hague, June 2015

Digital Subscriber Line

EECC694 - Shaaban. Transmission Channel

The art of deploying DSL, Broadband via noisy telephony wiring

Data Transmission. Raj Jain. Professor of CIS. The Ohio State University. Columbus, OH

A Simple Model of Relative Power vs. Reach

2. COAX Coax/CATV updates includes DOCSIS 2.0 (Data over Cable Service Interface Specification) and ITU-T (J.122).

Analysis Techniques for Loop Qualification and Spectrum Management

T = 1 f. Phase. Measure of relative position in time within a single period of a signal For a periodic signal f(t), phase is fractional part t p

Discussion Paper Category 6 vs Category 5e Cabling Systems and Implications for Voice over IP Networks

Loop Diagnostics in DSL

ITU-T xdsl Standards Study Group 15 Question 4

PCI-SIG ENGINEERING CHANGE NOTICE

Application Note 52. ADSL line qualification tests Author: Peter Ziemann (

Access to Data & Computer Networks Physical Level

Channel Bandwidth, MHz. Symbol Rate, Msym/sec

How To Write A Network Power Plan

Managing Interference in a Vectored VDSL2 environment Communications Alliance WC58

CONTRIBUTION ABSTRACT

Model CFA-24 Transparent Cable Farm Automation Switch

xdsl Tutorial By Brandon Provolt Engineering Intern Marketing and Product Development Group Schott Corporation Version 0.53 (beta) August 2000

ZHONE VDSL2 TECHNOLOGY. Access Technology for the Future. November 2009 CONTENTS

Advanced Signal Processing 1 Digital Subscriber Line

Current access technologies overview

Feasibility Study on High Speed Transmission over UTP Cables

WHITEPAPER. Cable and Connector for Hiperface dsl motor drive applications

Future Proof Telecommunications Networks with VDSL2

Reinventing DSL with Copper Pair Bonding

Bandwidth without boundaries. by Massimo Sorbara, Amitkumar Mahadevan, and Laurent Hendrichs

Understanding the Electrical Performance of Category Cables

HIGH CAPACITY DSL-SYSTEMS

Actiontec V1000W VDSL Gateway Static Business Class

Solution. (Chapters ) Dr. Hasan Qunoo. The Islamic University of Gaza. Faculty of Engineering. Computer Engineering Department

TCOM 370 NOTES 99-4 BANDWIDTH, FREQUENCY RESPONSE, AND CAPACITY OF COMMUNICATION LINKS

CARLETON UNIVERSITY Department of Systems and Computer Engineering. SYSC4700 Telecommunications Engineering Winter Term Exam 13 February 2014

Transcription:

Network Requirements for DSL systems, (ADSL through G.Fast) (A summarized view) Gilberto GG Guitarte, BB Connectivity Director TE Connectivity FTTH LATAM Chapter CHAIRMAN 2/24/2014 G.A.Guitarte 1

Executive summary 1)The higher the bandwidth, the more demanding the conditions on the copper loop will be. 2)The design rules for DSL are the same as for the DLC revised DR. 3)The SNR for a given bandwidth has to be greater than 30 db in order for that bandwidth to produce the maximum capabilty of it in terms o bps.(see slides 3 an 4) 4)The Attenuation above 250kHz follows increase with the Square Root of the Frequency increase.(see slides 5 and 6) 5)Excessive Attenuation, or excessive Noise or a combination of both will degrade SNR across the bandwidth for the DSL service being used and thus reduce the capacity od the Channel in bps, as expressed in Shannon s equation (see slides 12 to 20) 6)Bad insulation in the OSP Cables over copper wires may degrade the transmission performance of that cable..telcordia GR 421.Look for 30 to 40 minutes OIT minimum! (see slides 59 to 63) 7)Missing shields or missing grounds can favor Noise ingress in the copper channel and thus increase Outside sourced NOISE in the active pairs, decrease SNR, and decrease channel capacity C in bps. 8)Inside sourced noise ( SELF-FEXT) in the cable group of pairs, which degrades SNR, can be mitigated by vectoring. (At an extra cost 2/24/2014 G.A.Guitarte 2

Performance of QAM-n related to the SNR BER Non acceptable zone 10-7 10-10 SNR 2/24/2014 G.A.Guitarte 3 db

Signal / Noise related to QAM - n Bits/symbol QAM Signal/Noise ratio (db) for BER<10-7 4 QAM-16 21,8 6 QAM-64 27,8 8 QAM-256 33,8 9 QAM-512 36,8 10 QAM-1.024 39,9 12 QAM-4.096 45,9 14 QAM-16.384 51,9 2/24/2014 G.A.Guitarte 4

From ADSL to ADSL2+ to VDSL to VDSL2 (and now to G.Fast too.) Things get worse and more demanding requiring a very stable copper plant because In the realm of DSL, above 250 khz Att.(f2) = Att.(f1) f2/f1 f i >250kHz 2/24/2014 G.A.Guitarte 5 page 5 / February 24, 2014

ATTENUATION as a function of the Frequency of Operation From ADSL to ADSL2+ to VDSL to VDSL2 1)ADSL f1= f max = 1.1 MHz α1 =attenuation @ f1 2)ADSL2+ f2= f max = 2.2 MHz α2 = α1 2.2/1.1= α1 (1.4) 3)VDSL f3= f max = 12 MHz α3 = α1 12/1.1 = α1 (3.3) 4)VDSL2 f4= f max = 30 MHz α4 = α1 30/1.1 = α1 (5.2) 2/24/2014 G.A.Guitarte 6

POTS ADSL & ADSL 2 ADSL 2+ bandwidth 0 4kHz 1.1MHz 2.2MHz 2/24/2014 G.A.Guitarte 7

The Copper-Loop Plant Environment TP s are grouped into binders of 10,25, or 50 pr/group Design Rules were dictated for feeder and distribution cables (not including the drops) CO F1 F2 Feeder XC Cab Distrib Drop CPE Terminal 2/24/2014 G.A.Guitarte 8

The Rules POTS-ResistanceDesign (RD) Loop Resistance<1500Ω Coil when total loop length (including bridge taps > 15 kft. 88 mh coils @3kft. From CO and intervals of 6 kft. In loaded cables, total length (including bridge taps) beyond last coil <3 to 12 kft> No bridge taps between coils No loaded bridge taps DLC-CSA- Revised RD No coils Max 2 different gauges in one loop Total sum of bridge tap length < 2.5kft. Each bridge tap < 2.0 kft. 26AWG cable < 9kft. Including bridge taps Single gauge or multigauge cable with 19,22,or 24AWG, total cable length including bridge taps < 12 kft. If above includes 26AWG, total cable length < 12-3(L26) kft 9-Ltap 2/24/2014 G.A.Guitarte 9

The Rules DSL DLC-CSA-Revised RD No coils Max 2 different gauges in one loop Total sum of bridge tap length < 2.5kft. Each bridge tap < 2.0 kft. 26AWG cable < 9kft. Including bridge taps Single gauge or multigauge cable with 19,22,or 24AWG, total cable length including bridge taps < 12 kft. If above includes 26AWG, total cable length < 12-3(L26) kft 9-Ltap 2/24/2014 G.A.Guitarte 10

-10 Channel Capacities Transmit Signal -50-100 -140 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 Frequency ( Hz) 2/24/2014 G.A.Guitarte 11

-10 9 kft 26AWG Insertion Loss Transmit Signal -50-100 -140 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 Frequency ( Hz) 2/24/2014 G.A.Guitarte 12

-10 9 kft 26AWG Insertion Loss Channel Capacities Transmit Signal -50 Receive Signal -100-140 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 Frequency ( Hz) 2/24/2014 G.A.Guitarte 13

-10 Channel Capacities -50 Receive Signal -100-140 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 Frequency ( Hz) 2/24/2014 G.A.Guitarte 14

-10 Channel Capacities -50 Receive Signal -100 Noise -140 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 Frequency ( Hz) 2/24/2014 G.A.Guitarte 15

-10-50 Channel Capacities S/N = SNR = 10 logps/pn 10 log Ps 10 log Pn = Signal (db) Noise (db) Receive Signal -100 Noise -140 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 Frequency ( Hz) 2/24/2014 G.A.Guitarte 16

-10-50 Channel Capacities 40 (db) SNR 30 20 10 0 f(khz) Receive Signal -100 Noise -140 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 Frequency ( Hz) 2/24/2014 G.A.Guitarte 17

-10-50 SIGNAL to NOISE RATIO (SNR) Shannon Capacity for a Channel C= log 1+SNR(f) dƒ 2 0 = C= (Bps) C, in Bps,is the Area between SIGNAL and NOISE ReceiveSIGNAL -100 ReceiveNOISE -140 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 Frequency ( Hz) 2/24/2014 G.A.Guitarte 18

-10-50 SIGNAL to NOISE RATIO (SNR) Shannon Capacity for a Channel C= log 1+SNR(f) dƒ 2 0 Receive SIGNAL -100-140 Receive NOISE 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 Frequency ( Hz) 2/24/2014 G.A.Guitarte 19

GOOD! spectrum with good acceptable SNR > 30dB -10 Shannon Capacity SIGNAL to NOISE for RATIO a Channel (SNR) -50 C= log 1+SNR(f) dƒ 2 0 Receive Signal - 10 0 GOOD Receive Noise February 24, 2014 page 20 / Frequency (k Hz) page 20 / February 24, 2014

BETTER! More spectrum with same good acceptable SNR>30dB -10 Shannon Capacity SIGNAL to NOISE for RATIO a Channel (SNR) -50 C= log 1+SNR(f) dƒ 2 0 Receive Signal BETTER! - 10 0 Receive Noise February 24, 2014 page 21 / Frequency (k Hz) page 21 / February 24, 2014

-10 WORSE! More spectrum with SNR< 30dB Shannon Capacity SIGNAL to NOISE for RATIO a Channel (SNR) -50 C= log 1+SNR(f) dƒ 2 0 Receive Signal WORSE! - 10 0 Receive Noise February 24, 2014 page 22 / Frequency (k Hz) page 22 / February 24, 2014

Types of Cross-Talk Noise NEXT FEXT 2/24/2014 G.A.Guitarte 23

NEXT Signal Source Vj(t) @full power on TP j Tx Disturbing Near & Far End TP j NEXT Rx Xn(t) Disturbed Near End TP i Xf(t) Disturbed Far End 2/24/2014 G.A.Guitarte 24

FEXT Signal Source Vj(t) @full power on TP j Tx Disturbing Near & Far End TP j FEXT TP i Xn(t) Disturbed Near End Xf(t) Disturbed Far End Rx 2/24/2014 G.A.Guitarte 25

NEXT & FEXT Please refer to ANSI T1. 413 ANNEX B, page 165 Graphs B.2, B.3, B.4, and B.6 2/24/2014 G.A.Guitarte 26

-10 9 kft 26AWG Insertion Loss Channel Capacities Transmit Signal -50 Receive Signal -100-140 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 Frequency ( Hz) 2/24/2014 G.A.Guitarte 27

Impulse Noise (I-Noise) Please see ANSI T1.413 Page 140 Point 11.2.2 2/24/2014 G.A.Guitarte 28

-10 Wide Band Noise (W-Noise) -50 Sun of all unwanted signals in the frequency Spectrum of interest (30kHz to 1.1 MHz) Receive Signal -100-140 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 Frequency ( Hz) 2/24/2014 G.A.Guitarte 29

From ADSL to ADSL 2+ 2/24/2014 G.A.Guitarte 30

-10 9 kft 26AWG Insertion Loss Transmit Signal -50-100 -140 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000 2200 2400 2/24/2014 Frequency G.A.Guitarte ( Hz) 31

ADSL 2+ Increase in downstream bandwidth up to 2.2 MHz POTS ADSL & ADSL 2 ADSL 2+ bandwidth 0 4kHz 1.1MHz 2.2MHz 2/24/2014 G.A.Guitarte 32

-10 b 9 kft 26AWG Insertion Loss Transmit Signal -50-100 ADSL2+ Rx signal power is too attenuated with 9 kft. AWG26! -140 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000 2200 2400 2/24/2014 G.A.Guitarte 33 Frequency ( Hz)

-10-50 1mi/24/0.6 1mi/26/0.4 2mi/24/0.6-100 3mi/24/0.6 2mi/26/0.4-140 3mi/26/0.4 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000 2200 2400 2/24/2014 Frequency G.A.Guitarte ( Hz) 34

-10-50 1mi/26/0.4-100 -140 10x ADSL 2+ Disturbers 4xT1 disturbers 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000 2200 2400 2/24/2014 Frequency G.A.Guitarte ( Hz) 35

-10-50 -100 1mi/26/0.4-140 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000 2200 2400 2/24/2014 Frequency G.A.Guitarte ( Hz) 36

-10-50 Portion of spectrum usable (at or abpove 30dB SNR) SNR(dB) 40 30 20 10 0-100 1mi/26/0.4-140 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000 2200 2400 2/24/2014 Frequency G.A.Guitarte ( Hz) 37

So What with noise on the line? Standards tend to define the value of 30 db for SNR as a lower limit for acceptance of a loop for both POTS and DSL NOISE SOURCES: NEXT/FEXT/Proximity to Power Lines/ Electromagnetic field in general/am Radio/FM Radio/Other POTS/ Other what you want to name it, it is out there, in the universe. NOISE EFFECT ENABLERS: >Poor Cable Shielding and shielding continuity >Poor Grounding and Poor Grounding practices >Poor IR between conductors of PIC >Poor Connectivity (High CR) between connectors and PIC. >PIC degradation (decreasing OIT) >Many users of DSL in same cable generating NEXT and FEXT 2/24/2014 G.A.Guitarte 38

The Highway for outside sourced Noise? 2/24/2014 G.A.Guitarte 39

The Highway for Noise? = Shielding 2/24/2014 G.A.Guitarte 40

Noise on the road again ( a great traveller) Shield cont... PE Al Mylar PE/PP/Foam-Skin Cu 2/24/2014 G.A.Guitarte 41

The Bus STOP for Noise? 2/24/2014 G.A.Guitarte 42

The Bus STOP for Noise? = Grounding 2/24/2014 G.A.Guitarte 43

The Bus STOP for outside sourced Noise? = Grounding 2/24/2014 G.A.Guitarte 44

How as Noise increases (outside generated or inside generated or both!) Two following slides show how an ADSL2+ loop which originally had 75% of the 2.2 MHz spectrum available producing a max of 18Mbps,degrades to 5% or 1.1Mbps max throughput as the total received Noise increases at the user end, produced by FEXT, and bad loop condition in terms of shielding, grounding, insulation, etc. 2/24/2014 G.A.Guitarte 45

-10-50 SNR(dB) 40 30 20 10 0-10 0 1mi/26/0.4 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000 2200 2400 February 24, 2014 page 46 / Frequency ( khz)

-10-50 Usable SpectrumAfter Noise increases! SNR(dB) +40 +30 +20 +10 0-10 - 10 0 Recived NOISE Received SIGNAL 1mi/26/0.4 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000 2200 2400 February 24, 2014 page 47 / Frequency ( khz)

As you can imagine, the conditions get tighter for VDSL, and even tighter for VDSL2, because of the ATTENUATION imposed by COPPER to the higher frequencies they try to use!!! and this is the reason why VDSL and VDSL2 have interleaved segments of UP and DOWN streams of spectrum because most likely, the higher segments of UP and DOWN are not usable! In next slides, DS = Downstreamk, and US = Upstream 2/24/2014 G.A.Guitarte 48

VDSL PSD (G.993.1, Annexes A to F) dbm/hz -30-40 -50-60 -70-60 to -56.5 dbm/hz Tx signal DS1 US1 DS2 US2 2kft. AWG26-80 -90 3kft. AWG26-100 -110 Rx signal -120-140 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 MHz February 24, 2014 page 49 /

dbm/hz -20-30 -40-50 VDSL2 PSD DS1 US1 DS2 US2 DS3 US3 200 m PIC filledawg26/ 0.4mm -60-70 -80-90 -100-110 -120 0.640 3.75 5.2 8.5 12 18.1 30 February 24, 2014 page 50 / MHz

dbm/hz -20-30 -40-50 VDSL2 DS1 US1 DS2 US2 DS3 US3 200 m PIC filledawg26/ 0.4mm -60-70 -80-90 -100-110 Noise test profile per ITU -120 0.640 3.75 5.2 8.5 12 18.1 30 February 24, 2014 page 51 / MHz

dbm/hz -20-30 -40-50 VDSL2 200 m PIC filled AWG26/0.4mm DS1 US1 DS2 US2 DS3 US3-60 -70-80 -90-100 -110-120 0 0.640 3.75 5.2 8.5 12 18.1 February 24, 2014 page 52 / MHz

And now, a couple of comments on G.Fast It will use 2 spectrum segments 106 MHz and 212 MHz It will use DMT (Discrete Multi-tones, like the rest of the DSL family It will use 12bits per DMT coupled with TDM It will use FEC with Trellis encoding and Reed Solomon encoding It is supposed to reach 250m on 0.5mm diameter copper pair (this, will happen on a good sunny day, no cloud in the sky, no disturbers, or one and only one customer on the whole copper cable using it, and at low speeds) 2/24/2014 G.A.Guitarte 53

Let us apply the basic formula for the same kind of copper usage Att.(f2) = Att.(f1) f2/f1 f i >250kHz HowmuchworsedoesG.Fasthaveitthan thehighestspectrumofvdsl2atits30mhzmax? 2/24/2014 G.A.Guitarte 54

G.Fast Att at 106 MHz =Att VDSL2 106/30 = 1.88 times Att VDSL2 G.Fast Att at 212 MHz = Att VDSL2 212/30 = 2.66 times AttVDSL2 This ratios of G.Fast max. attenuations over VDSL2 max. attenuation just point to the hard fact that.. G.Fast will ONLY Work in very short loops Loops MUST be in extremely good physical conditions Loops MUST be in extremly good electrical conditions AND with the help of VECTORING. Because noise is INTOLERABLE for G.Fast due to the extremely high frequencies used 2/24/2014 G.A.Guitarte 55

CONCLUSION Ifeverybodyagreesthatthehighestcostoftheaccess Networkisinvolvedinthecivilworksoftheconstruction, andyouwillhavetogetfiberwithin50moftheuserplus InvestontoponallofthehelpyoucangetoutofVECTORING, whynotuseftth? 2/24/2014 G.A.Guitarte 56