OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL



Similar documents
OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL

OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL

OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL

OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL

OREGON PROPERLY VERIFIED CORRECTION OF DEFICIENCIES IDENTIFIED DURING SURVEYS OF NURSING HOMES PARTICIPATING IN MEDICARE AND MEDICAID

OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL

JUt vengriy-- Review offederal Medicaid Claims Made by Inpatient Substance Abuse Treatment Facilities in New Jersey (A )

In total, Massachusetts overstated its Medicaid claim for reimbursement by $5,312,447 (Federal share).

Review of Medicaid Upper-Payment-Limit Requirements for Kansas Nursing Facility Reimbursement (A )

J:::'~~ c.4;t: Regional Inspector General for Audit Services. June 17,2008. Report Number: A

perform cost settlements to ensure that future final payments for school-based services are based on actual costs.

SEP f Nationwide Review of Inpatient Rehabilitation Facilities' Compliance With Medicare's Transfer Regulation (A )

MAY Report Number: A-OI

COLORADO CLAIMED UNALLOWABLE MEDICAID NURSING FACILITY SUPPLEMENTAL PAYMENTS

MEDICAID DRUG PRICE COMPARISON: AVERAGE SALES PRICE TO AVERAGE WHOLESALE PRICE

Page 2 Ms. Janna Zumbrun. HHS Action Official:

OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL

Review Of Hartford Hospital s Controls To Ensure Accuracy Of Wage Data Used For Calculating Inpatient Prospective Payment System Wage Indexes

/Diann M. Saltman/ for George M. Reeb Acting Deputy Inspector General for Audit Services

INFORMATION SECURITY AT THE HEALTH RESOURCES AND SERVICES ADMINISTRATION NEEDS IMPROVEMENT BECAUSE CONTROLS WERE NOT FULLY IMPLEMENTED AND MONITORED

CALCULATION OF VOLUME- WEIGHTED AVERAGE SALES PRICE FOR MEDICARE PART B PRESCRIPTION DRUGS

August 9, Report Number: A

i;; .j. \::::l' P: t~

OREGON DID NOT BILL MANUFACTURERS FOR REBATES FOR PHYSICIAN-ADMINISTERED DRUGS DISPENSED TO ENROLLEES OF MEDICAID MANAGED-CARE ORGANIZATIONS

MEDICARE BENEFICIARIES PAID NEARLY HALF OF THE C OSTS FOR OUTPATIENT SERVICES AT CRITICAL ACCESS HOSPITALS

January 18, Donald M. Berwick, M.D. Administrator Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. /Daniel R. Levinson/ Inspector General

APR,: Charlene Frizzera Acting Administrator Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. FROM: Daniel R. Levinson ~,u,l, ~.~ Inspector General

CMS DID NOT ALWAYS MANAGE AND OVERSEE CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE

THE FRAUD PREVENTION SYSTEM IDENTIFIED MILLIONS IN MEDICARE SAVINGS, BUT THE DEPARTMENT COULD STRENGTHEN SAVINGS DATA

Report Number: A

Montana Did Not Properly Pay Medicare Part B Deductibles and Coinsurance for Outpatient Services (A )

MORRISTOWN MEDICAL CENTER INCORRECTLY BILLED MEDICARE INPATIENT CLAIMS WITH KWASHIORKOR

/-..~.~ JAN Mr. Dennis Conroy, SPHR

March 23, Report Number: A

REVIEW OF MEDICARE CONTRACTOR INFORMATION SECURITY PROGRAM EVALUATIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2013

OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL

MOUNT SINAI MEDICAL CENTER INCORRECTLY BILLED MEDICARE INPATIENT CLAIMS WITH KWASHIORKOR

Medicaid Revocation of Medicare DME Suppliers

COSTS CHARGED TO HEAD START PROGRAM ADMINISTERED BY ROCKINGHAM COMMUNITY ACTION,

, MAY. oß.vi.. Daniel R. Levinson ~ ~ .~~.vi...

MEDICARE INAPPROPRIATELY PAID HOSPITALS INPATIENT CLAIMS SUBJECT TO THE POSTACUTE CARE TRANSFER POLICY

FEB To facilitate identification, please refer to report number A in all correspondence relating to this report.

. 4 " ~ f.".2 DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL. December 19,2003. Our Reference: Report Number A-O

MEDICARE COMPLIANCE FOLLOWUP REVIEW OF BOSTON MEDICAL CENTER

JUN Review of Termination Claim for Postretirement Benefit Costs Made by CareFirst. Maryland, Incorporated (A )

MEDICARE PART D E-PRESCRIBING STANDARDS: EARLY ASSESSMENT SHOWS PARTIAL CONNECTIVITY

June 13, Report Number: A

JUN SUBJECT: Review of Head Start Board of Directors, Inc., for the Period September 1,2006, Through October 23,2007 (A-OI )

HEALTH INSURANCE MARKETPLACES GENERALLY PROTECTED PERSONALLY IDENTIFIABLE INFORMATION BUT COULD IMPROVE CERTAIN INFORMATION SECURITY CONTROLS

CDC S ETHICS PROGRAM FOR SPECIAL GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES OFFICE OF AUDIT SERVICES 233 NORTH MICHIGAN AVENUE. August 4, 2008

()FFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL

MEDICARE DRUG INTEGRITY CONTRACTORS IDENTIFICATION

COMPARING PHARMACY REIMBURSEMENT: MEDICARE PART D TO MEDICAID

OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL SPECIAL FRAUD ALERT FRAUD AND ABUSE IN NURSING HOME ARRANGEMENTS WITH HOSPICES

UPDATED. Special Advisory Bulletin on the Effect of Exclusion from Participation in Federal Health Care Programs

Title V Preventing Fraud and Abuse. Subtitle A- Establishment of New Health and Human Services and Department of Justice Health Care Fraud Positions

EFFECT OF THE PART D COVERAGE GAP ON MEDICARE BENEFICIARIES WITHOUT FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE IN 2006

Transcription:

Department of Health and Human Services OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL Medicare Beneficiary Satisfaction With Supplemental Health Insurance & $ # < # SERVIC&$ ~oq JUNE GIBBS BROWN Inspector General % 3e+ ~ J-- JANUARY 1997 *daa > 0EI-04-93-O0154

OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL The mission of the Office of Inspector General (OIG), as mandated by Public Law 95-452, is to protect the integrity of the Department of Health and Human Services programs as well as the health and welfare of beneficiaries served by them. This statutory mission is carried out through a nationwide program of audits, investigations, inspections, sanctions, and fraud alerts. The Inspector General informs the Secretary of program and management problems and recommends legislative, regulatory, and operational approaches to correct them. Office of Evaluation and Inspections The Offik of Evaluation and Inspections (OEI) is one of several components of the Office of Inspector General. It conducts short-term management and program evaluations (called inspections) that focus on issues of concern to the Department, the Congress, and the public. The inspection reports provide fiidings and recommendations on the efficiency, vulnerability, and effectiveness of departmental programs. OEI S Atlanta Regional Office prepared this report under the direction of Jesse J. Flowers, Regional Inspector General, and Christopher Koehler, Deputy Regional Inspector General. Principal OEI staff included: REGION Betty Apt, Team Leader James Green, Contractor Jackie Watkins, Program Analyst Joe Townsel, Program Analyst Tamrny Hipple, Statistician HEADQUARTERS Winnie Walker, Program Specialist Stuart Wright, Program Specialist Brian Ritchie, Technical Suppoti Barbara Tedesco, Statistician To obtain a copy of this report, call the Atlanta Regional Office at (404) 331-4108.

*+,@Nm ~ %.* DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH& HUMAN SERVICES Office of Inspector General : ss 8 +,+ ~, w4 L Memorandum Date ~AFl221997 From June Gibbs Brown Inspector Gener + 9 S@xt OIG Final Repor : Medicare Beneficiary Satisfaction with Supplemental HeaL?h Insurance, 0EI-04-93-O0154 To Bruce C. Vladeck Administrator Health Care Financing Administration During our 1995 survey of Medicare beneficiary satisfaction, we asked 942 beneficiaries about their satisfaction with insurance that supplements Medicare coverage. We did this at the request of Health Care Financing Administration (HCFA) staff who expressed an interest in this issue. Attached is our analysis of beneficiary responses to the questions HCFA staff suggested we include in our survey. Our survey indicates that 84 percent of beneficiaries have medical coverage in addition to Medicare, and they are satisfied with their supplemental policies. Most said they would call the insurance company that issued the supplemental policy if they had problems with their supplemental policies. We hope you find this information useful. We are not making recommendations, and there is no need for you to respond to this. Nevertheless, we would be glad to receive any comments you have. Also, if you have any questions, please contact me or George Grob, Deputy Inspector General for Evaluation and Inspections, or have your staff contact Mary Beth Clarke at (202) 619-2481. Attachment

PURPOSE To determine beneficiary satisfaction with insurance that supplements Medicare. BACKGROUND During our 1995 survey of Medicare beneficiary satisfaction, we asked 942 beneficiaries about their satisfaction with insurance that supplements Medicare coverage. Several people in HCFA expressed an interest in this subject, and suggested questions for us to include in our annual survey on beneficiary satisfaction. In September 1995, we mailed a questionnaire to 1244 randomly-selected Medicare beneficiaries for whom Part B claims had been filed in Calendar Year 1994. We excluded from our sample beneficiaries who were enrolled in an HMO. A total of 942 beneficiaries returned completed questionnaires, for a response rate of 76 percent. A summary of major findings of that survey follows. BENEFICIARIES HAVE SUPPLEMENTAL INSURANCE Eighty-four percent of the beneficiaries said they have medical coverage in addition to Medicare. The following table showsthetypesofsupplemental insurance beneficiariesthey said have. II Insurance Through Curr.nt orforrn.r EnqioY.r I 42% II Private Medicare Supplemental (Medigap) 32% Medicaid 12% Other 3% I *Percentages total more than 84% because some benejkiaries said they have more than one type ofinsurance.

BENEFICIARIES ARE SATISFIED Eighty-eight percent of beneficiaries who have supplemental policies are satisfied with them. Only 5 percent were dissatisfied. 53% Very $atisfiecf 2% Very Dissatisfied 3% Generally Die6atie fied % Neither Satiafied nor Dissatisfied 35% Generally tlatisfled Responses of beneficiaries who have either Medigap or insurance through former or current employment are included.

BENEFICIARIES CALL INSURANCE COMPANIES IF PROBLEMS ARISE Fifty-eight percent of beneficiaries said they would call the insurance company that issued the policy if they had problems with their supplemental policies. Few beneficiaries said they would call their State insurance, counseling, and assistance offices. Insurance Company that Issued Policy I 58% Medicare Carrier 17% State Insurance Commission 10% State Insurance, Counseling, andassistance OffIce 3% Other 2% Don t Know 11% Responses of beneficiaries who have either Medigap or insurance through former or current employment are included. Percentages total more than 100 % because some beneficiaries said they would contact more than one a,qency. 3