IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA (Before a Referee)



Similar documents
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA THE FLORIDA BAR. Appellee JOHN STANLEY MORSE. Appellant

2012 WI 48 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN. In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against Aaron J. Rollins, Attorney at Law:

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 9 th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA

The Public Defender cannot file these motions for you or represent you in your hearing unless the Court appoints us to do so.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA (Before a Referee)

VIRGINIA: BEFORE THE THIRD DISTRICT COMMITTEE, SECTION III, OF THE VIRGINIA STATE BAR DISTRICT COMMITTEE DETERMINATION (PUBLIC REPRIMAND WITH TERMS)

How To Get A $1,000 Filing Fee From A Bankruptcy Filing Fee In Arkansas

The Public Defender cannot file these motions for you or represent you in your hearing unless the Court appoints us to do so.

Supreme Court of Florida

Misc Docket No

SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN

Misc Docket No

BEFORE THE SUPREME COURT COMMITTEE ON PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT PANEL A CONSENT FINDINGS & ORDER

Case 8:13-cv EAK-TBM Document 14 Filed 05/20/13 Page 1 of 7 PageID 49 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION

-410 St John s Avenue, Palatka, FL or from the following website

SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN

Certified Process Server APPLICANT CHECKLIST

ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS. Misc Docket No

SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN OFFICE OF LAWYER REGULATION. Colleen J. Locke 13-OLR- 12 Attorney at Law

(Before a Refe REPORT OF REFEREE

O R D E R. Court Rules of Disciplinary Procedure. On December 17, 2013, the Disciplinary Board of the

General District Courts

(Before a referee) APPELLATE ARGUMENT

Recommendation of the Three-Member Panel of the Disciplinary Board dated April 11,

NOTICE OF APPEAL., Defendant/Appellant appeals to the Fourth. District Court of Appeal the judgment and sentence entered by the Honorable,

ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS

INSTRUCTIONS FOR SEALING/EXPUNGING AN ADULT CRIMINAL COURT RECORD

ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS

ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS MISC. DOCKET NO. 99- IN THE MATTER OF GREGORY B. DUNBAR

MISSOURI S LAWYER DISCIPLINE SYSTEM

ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS. MiSC DOCket NO. 98m 9133

BEFORE THE FLORIDA JUDICIAL QUALIFICATIONS COMMISSION. INQUIRY CONCERNING A JUDGE, THE HONORABLE JOHN LAKIN No / NOTICE OF FORMAL CHARGES

PART IV GEORGIA RULES OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT

ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS. Misc Docket No. 96-9i72

BURNET COUNTY ATTORNEY S OFFICE Don't Get Burned By A Hot Check

ER OF THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS

JACQUELYN P. NEEDELMAN. Bar Counsel. Attorney No Miami, Florida (305) JOHN T. BERRY. Staff Counsel. Attorney No.

! Ji ~o Docket Noo

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA, ORLANDO DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Chapter 7

BEFORE THE SEVENTH DISTRICT SUBCOMMITTEE OF THE VIRGINIA STATE BAR

INSTRUCTIONS FOR FILING A CONDOMINIUM / COOPERATIVE COMPLAINT

1. This is an action to contest the decision of the Lee County Value. 2. At all times material herein, the Property Appraiser was the duly elected

Inquiry Concerning A Florida Lawyer

The Circuit Court. Judges and Clerks. Jurisdiction

AMENDED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT

ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS. Misc Docket No. 97-

SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN

PLEASE TYPE OR WRITE LEGIBLY

STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA CONDOMINIUMS, TIMESHARES AND MOBILE HOMES

ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS

SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN

The N.C. State Bar v. Wood NO. COA (Filed 1 February 2011) 1. Attorneys disciplinary action convicted of criminal offense

In the SUPREME COURT STATE OF FLORIDA. CASE #: SC Emma Murray LT CASE #: 1D06-475

SUPREME COURT, STATE OF COLORADO

BEFORE THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERhECEIVED ON GRIEVANCES AND DISCIPLINE OF n THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO

BEFORE THE SUPREME COURT COMMITTEE ON PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT PANEL B CONSENT FINDINGS AND ORDER

[Cite as Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Nienaber (1997), 80 Ohio St.3d 534.] Attorneys at law Misconduct Indefinite suspension Making affirmative

In the Matter of Thomas J. Howard, Jr. O R D E R. This matter is before the court pursuant to a petition for reciprocal discipline filed by this

This attorney-discipline proceeding is before the Court

BEFORE THE SUPREME COURT COMMITTEE ON PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT PANEL B FINDINGS AND ORDER

ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS. Misc Docket No. 96-_2175

v. CASE NO.: 2008-CA O WRIT NO.: 08-69

RDER OF THE SUP R EME COURT OF TEXAS

1. The Petitioner is a board certified Ophthalmologist who performs laser vision

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE THIRTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA GENERAL CIVIL DIVISION

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA (Lower Court Case No.: 4D05-746) CASE NO. SC STATE OF FLORIDA, Petitioner, vs. JEFFREY LOVELACE, Respondent.

SIXTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF FLORIDA

STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA CONDOMINIUMS, TIMESHARES AND MOBILE HOMES

Law Enforcement Officers Bill of Rights. Sections , F.S Law enforcement officers' and correctional officers' rights.

REPORT, DECISION AND IMPOSITION OF SANCTION

ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA MIAMI DIVISION CASE NO CR MARTINEZ/GOODMAN REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS ON

STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA LAND SALES, CONDOMINIUMS, AND MOBILE HOMES

WHEREAS, this Circuit has recognized that the creation of specialized diversion programs

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Saladin Eric Shakir, Misc. Docket AG No. 8, September Term, 2009

Misc Docket No. 99- (3005

Plaintiff, vs. CASE NO ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF S MOTION FOR AWARD OF ATTORNEY S FEES AND COSTS

ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS

11/20/2009 "See News Release 073 for any Concurrences and/or Dissents." SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA NO. 09-B-1795 IN RE: DEBORAH HARKINS BAER

FORMS AND INSTRUCTIONS CAN ALSO BE PRINTED DROM THE CLERK OF COURTS WEBSITE AT:

ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS

PLAINTIFF S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL. MYRIAM DEL SOCORRO LOPEZ, by and through his undersigned counsel, and files this First

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. v. CASE NO. SC07-95 AMICUS BRIEF OF THE FLORIDA ASSOCIATION OF CRIMINAL DEFENSE LAWYERS, IN SUPPORT OF RESPONDENT

Case 1:14-cv ERK-JMA Document 1-1 Filed 02/27/14 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 6 CIVIL COVER SHEET (SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON NEXT PAGE OF THIS FORM.

Defendant s Pro se Motion to Modify or Terminate Probation or Community Control

STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA LAND SALES, CONDOMINIUMS, AND MOBILE HOMES

UPL ADVISORY OPINION UPL (December 2004) Non-lawyer In-house Employee Legal Services

Transcription:

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA (Before a Referee) THE FLORIDA BAR, CASE NO. Complainant, TFB NO. 2010-10,403(20A) v. 2010-10,970(20A) 2010-11,165(20A) MATTHEW KIMBALL MCDOWELL, Respondent. COMPLAINT THE FLORIDA BAR, Complainant, files this Complaint against Matthew Kimball McDowell, Respondent, pursuant to Rule 3-3.2(b), Rules Regulating The Florida Bar, and alleges: 1. Respondent is, and at all times mentioned herein was, a member of The Florida Bar, subject to the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court of Florida. COUNTI TFBNo.2010-10.403(20A) 2. Paragraph 1 is reallaged and incorporated herein by reference. 3. At all times relevant to this Complaint, Respondent practiced law as a sole practitioner in Lee County, Florida, concentrating primarily in the area of criminal law. 4. At all times relevant to this Complaint, Orin Richard Oppermann (Oppermann) was the owner and primary bail bond agent for Alpha Omega Bail

Bonds (Alpha Omega). 5. Margarita Oppermann was the wife of Orin Oppermann and was employed as an associate bail bond agent by Alpha Omega. 6. The Oppermanns, through Alpha Omega, posted bond for individuals who were arrested and held at Lee County Jail. 7. Respondent provided the Oppermanns with a supply of his professional business cards. 8. The Oppermanns gave Respondent's business cards to their bail bond clients. 9. The Oppermanns suggested to their bail bond clients that they employ Respondent for legal representation in criminal matters. 10. Respondent represented numerous clients referred to him by the Oppermanns. 11. During 2008 and 2009, Respondent's criminal practice consisted mostly of individuals whose bail bonds had been posted by Alpha Omega. 12. The Oppermanns' referral of Alpha Omega's clients to Respondent was in violation of the Florida Statutes governing bail bond agents. 13. Respondent was aware that potential clients contacted him as a result of referrals by the Oppermanns. 14. By supplying his business cards to the Oppermanns and by knowingly 2

accepting professional employment as a result of referrals from the Oppermanns, Respondent engaged in solicitation in violation of Rule 4-7.4(a), Rules Regulating The Florida Bar. 15. On April 30, 2010, the Twentieth Judicial Circuit Grievance Committee "A" found probable cause for further disciplinary proceedings, and the presiding member of the grievance committee has approved the instant complaint. 16. By reason of the foregoing, the Respondent has violated the following Rules Regulating The Florida Bar: Rule 3-4.3 (commission by a lawyer of any act that is unlawful or contrary to honesty and justice); Rule 4-7.4 (Direct Contact with Prospective Clients); and Rule 4-8.4(a) (Misconduct: A lawyer shall not violate or attempt to violate the Rules of Professional Conduct, knowingly assist or induce another to do so or do so through the acts of another). COUNT II TFBNo. 2010-10,970(20A) 17. Paragraph 1 is realleged and incorporated herein by reference. 18. On or about August 29, 2009, Mary Carroll was arrested on a misdemeanor DUI charge and incarcerated at the Lee County Jail. 19. Carroll's bond was posted by Alpha Omega. 20. Oppermann provided Carroll with Respondent's business card and suggested she call Respondent concerning legal representation in her criminal

matter. 21. Based on Oppermann's recommendation and the information provided by him, Carroll contacted Respondent concerning legal representation. 22. On or about September 3, 2009, Carroll hired Respondent to represent her regarding the criminal charge. 23. By supplying his business cards to the Oppermanns and by knowingly accepting professional employment from Carroll as a result of a referral from the Oppermanns, Respondent engaged in solicitation in violation of Rule 4-7.4(a), Rules Regulating The Florida Bar. 24. Respondent failed to keep Carroll reasonably informed concerning the status of her case and failed to explain matters to the extent reasonably necessary to allow Carroll to make informed decisions regarding the representation. 25. Respondent failed to adequately communicate with Carroll concerning the continued administrative suspension of her driver's license. 26. As a result, Carroll was unaware of the continued suspension of her driver's license and continued to drive on a suspended license. 27. On July 30, 2010, the Twentieth Judicial Circuit Grievance Committee "A" found probable cause for further disciplinary proceedings, and the presiding member of the grievance committee has approved the instant complaint. 28. By reason of the foregoing, the Respondent has violated the following 4

Rules Regulating The Florida Bar: Rule 3-4.3 (commission by a lawyer of any act that is unlawful or contrary to honesty and justice); Rule 4-1.4 (failure to communicate); Rule 4-7.4 (Direct Contact with Prospective Clients); and Rule 4-8.4(a) (Misconduct: A lawyer shall not violate or attempt to violate the Rules of Professional Conduct, knowingly assist or induce another to do so or do so through the acts of another). COUNT III TFB No. 2010-1 U65(20A) 29. Paragraph 1 is reallaged and incorporated herein by reference. 30. On or about September 2, 2008, Wayland Meade Sparrow (Sparrow) was arrested and incarcerated at the Lee County Jail. 31. Sparrow's bond was posted by Alpha Omega. 32. Oppermann suggested to Sparrow's mother, Jean Sparrow, that she contact Respondent concerning legal representation for her son. 33. Oppermann provided Ms. Sparrow with Respondent's business card. 34. Based on Oppermann's recommendation and information provided by him, Ms. Sparrow called and spoke with Respondent regarding representation for her son. 35. On or about September 4, 2008, Sparrow hired Respondent to represent him concerning his criminal case.

36. By supplying his business cards to the Oppermanns and by knowingly accepting professional employment from Meade Sparrow as a result of a referral from the Oppermanns, Respondent engaged in solicitation in violation of Rule 4-7.4(a), Rules Regulating The Florida Bar. 37. On July 30, 2010, the Twentieth Judicial Circuit Grievance Committee "A" found probable cause for further disciplinary proceedings, and the presiding member of the grievance committee has approved the instant complaint. 38. By reason of the foregoing, the Respondent has violated the following Rules Regulating The Florida Bar: Rule 3-4.3 (commission by a lawyer of any act that is unlawful or contrary to honesty and justice); Rule 4-7.4 (Direct Contact with Prospective Clients); and Rule 4-8.4(a) (Misconduct: A lawyer shall not violate or attempt to violate the Rules of Professional Conduct, knowingly assist or induce another to do so or do so through the acts of another). WHEREFORE, The Florida Bar respectfully requests that the Respondent be appropriately disciplined. Kenneth Lawrence Marvin Jrth*-H^nrv Lee Paul Staff Counsel / Bar Counsel The Florida Bar The Florida Bar 651 E. Jefferson Street 4200 George J. Bean Pkwy. Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2300 Suite 2580 (850) 561-5600 Tampa, Florida 33607 Florida Bar No. 200999 (813)875-9821 Florida Bar No. 508373

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I HEREBY CERTIFY that the original of this Complaint has been furnished by regular U. S. mail to The Honorable Thomas D. Hall, Clerk, the Supreme Court of Florida, 500 South Duval Street, Tallahassee, Florida 32399-1925; a true and correct copy by U.S. certified mail No. 7009 2250 0001 3998 9259, Return Receipt Requested, and by regular U.S. mail to Matthew Kimball McDowell, Esq., Respondent, at record Bar address of 13180 N. Cleveland Ave., Suite 111, N. Fort Myers, FL 33903-6230; a copy to Henry Lee Paul, Bar Counsel, The Florida Bar, 4200 George J. Bean Pkwy., Suite 2580, Tampa, Florida 33607; and a copy to Laird Andrew Lile, Designated Reviewer, at 3033 Riviera Drive, Suite 104, Naples, Florida 34103; all this jj\\\ day of November, 2010. NOTICE OF TRIAL COUNSEL Kenneth Lawrence Marvin Staff Counsel PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the trial counsel in this matter is Henry Lee Paul, Bar Counsel, whose address is The Florida Bar, 4200 George J. Bean Pkwy., Suite 2580, Tampa, Florida 33607. Respondent need not address pleadings, correspondence, etc. in this matter to anyone other than trial counsel and to Staff Counsel. The Florida Bar, 651 E. Jefferson Street, Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2300.