How To Get A $1,000 Filing Fee From A Bankruptcy Filing Fee In Arkansas



Similar documents
BEFORE THE SUPREME COURT COMMITTEE ON PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT PANEL B FINDINGS AND ORDER

BEFORE THE SUPREME COURT COMMITTEE ON PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT PANEL A CONSENT FINDINGS & ORDER

BEFORE THE SUPREME COURT COMMITTEE ON PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT PANEL B FINDINGS AND ORDER

BEFORE THE SUPREME COURT COMMITTEE ON PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT PANEL B CONSENT FINDINGS AND ORDER

SUPREME COURT, STATE OF COLORADO

People v. Fiore. 12PDJ076. March 15, Attorney Regulation. The Presiding Disciplinary Judge disbarred David Anthony Fiore (Attorney Registration

In the Matter of Thomas J. Howard, Jr. O R D E R. This matter is before the court pursuant to a petition for reciprocal discipline filed by this

02/26/2014 "See News Release 013 for any Concurrences and/or Dissents." SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA NO. 14-B-0061 IN RE: KEISHA M.

SUPREME COURT, STATE OF COLORADO

SUPREME COURT, STATE OF COLORADO

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. No. 112,569. In the Matter of LUCAS L. THOMPSON, Respondent. ORIGINAL PROCEEDING IN DISCIPLINE

BEFORE THE LAWYER DISCIPLINARY BOARD STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA STATEMENT OF CHARGES

BEFORE THE SUPREME COURT COMMITTEE ON PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT PANEL C HEARING FINDINGS AND ORDER

SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN

NO. 14-B-0619 IN RE: DAVID P. BUEHLER ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS

SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA NO. 98-B-2513 IN RE: BARBARA IONE BIVINS ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS

NO. 10-B-2582 IN RE: ROBERT L. BARRIOS ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS

Donald P. Russo, you stand before the Disciplinary Board, your

REPORT, DECISION AND IMPOSITION OF SANCTION

[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Wolanin, 121 Ohio St.3d 390, 2009-Ohio-1393.]

FILED November 9, 2007

SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. No. 112,059. In the Matter of PETER EDWARD GOSS, Respondent. ORIGINAL PROCEEDING IN DISCIPLINE

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA January 2013 Term. No LAWYER DISCIPLINARY BOARD, Petitioner. JOHN P. SULLIVAN, Respondent

VIRGINIA: BEFORE THE THIRD DISTRICT COMMITTEE, SECTION III, OF THE VIRGINIA STATE BAR DISTRICT COMMITTEE DETERMINATION (PUBLIC REPRIMAND WITH TERMS)

To the Honorable Chief Justice and Associate Justices of. This matter came before us on a certification of default

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. No. 105,258. In the Matter of BART A. CHAVEZ, Respondent. ORIGINAL PROCEEDING IN DISCIPLINE

STATE BAR COURT OF CALIFORNIA HEARING DEPARTMENT LOS ANGELES. Case Nos.: 13-O DFM ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND. Misc. Docket AG. No. 13. September Term, 2005 ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION OF MARYLAND WILLIAM M.

Misc Docket No

In the Indiana Supreme Court

NO. D AGREED JUDGMENT OF FULLY PROBATED SUSPENSION

NO. 00-B-3532 IN RE: LEONARD O. PARKER, JR ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS

BEFORE THE DISCIPLINARY BOARD OF THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

[Cite as Cleveland Metro. Bar Assn. v. Schiff, 139 Ohio St.3d 456, 2014-Ohio-2573.]

SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA NO. 09-B-2680 IN RE: KENNER O. MILLER, JR. ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS

Misc Docket No

ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS

SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN

SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN

O R D E R. Court Rules of Disciplinary Procedure. On December 17, 2013, the Disciplinary Board of the

ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS

William Austin Watkins, you stand before the Disciplinary Board, your

INDIANA PARALEGAL ASSOCIATION CODE OF ETHICS AND PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY AND RULES FOR ENFORCEMENT

OFFICE OF CHIEF DISCIPLINARY C ROSS A ANNENBERG 100 WASHINGTON STREET ELLIS LAW OFFICES HARTFORD CT PLEASANT STREET WORCESTER MA 01609

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA THE FLORIDA BAR. Appellee JOHN STANLEY MORSE. Appellant

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE USPTO DIRECTOR ) ) ) ) ) FINAL ORDER

SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN

(Before a referee) APPELLATE ARGUMENT

[Cite as Mahoning Cty. Bar Assn. v. Vivo, 135 Ohio St.3d 82, 2012-Ohio-5682.]

[Cite as Columbus Bar Assn. v. Chasser, 124 Ohio St.3d 578, 2010-Ohio-956.]

[Cite as Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Dearfield, 130 Ohio St.3d 363, 2011-Ohio-5295.]

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Saladin Eric Shakir, Misc. Docket AG No. 8, September Term, 2009

BEFORE THE BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT OF THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ~ the Government of~~t'fffv>ed ) )

FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY

SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN

November Tex. B. J. 960

RULES FOR LAWYER DISCIPLINARY ENFORCEMENT OF THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

People v. Webb. 13PDJ007. June 13, Attorney Regulation. The Presiding Disciplinary Judge disbarred Glenn L. Webb (Attorney Registration Number

IN RE: STEPHEN L. TUNNEY NO. BD S.J.C. Order of Term Suspension entered by Justice Lenk on January 10,

[Cite as Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. O'Brien, 96 Ohio St.3d 151, 2002-Ohio-3621.]

ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS

ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS

! Ji ~o Docket Noo

CAUSE NO. THE CITY OF AUSTIN, TEXAS IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF VS. TRAVIS COUNTY, TEXAS NEDITH TORRES JUDICIAL DISTRICT PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL PETITION

ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS MISC. DOCKET NO. 99- IN THE MATTER OF GREGORY B. DUNBAR

2012 WI 48 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN. In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against Aaron J. Rollins, Attorney at Law:

ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS. MiSC Docket N m J^- A 1

HOUSTON LAWYER REFERRAL SERVICE, INC. RULES OF MEMBERSHIP

BEFORE THE SUPREME COURT COMMITTEE ON PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT PANEL B FINDINGS AND ORDER

FINAL ORDER Effective: 11/08/2004

Supreme Court of Florida

ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS

BEFORE THE DISCIPLINARY BOARD OF THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA NO. 00-B-3082 IN RE: LESTER J. NAQUIN, III ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS IN THE MATTER OF BRUCE MICHAEL FRIEDMAN ORDER. On this day, the Court considered the Motion for Acceptance of

[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Harmon, 143 Ohio St.3d 1, 2014-Ohio-4598.]

VIRGINIA: BEFORE THE VIRGINIA STATE BAR DISCIPLINARY BOARD MEMORANDUM ORDER

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA (Before a Referee)

RDER OF THE SUP R EME COURT OF TEXAS

MERCER COUNTY BAR ASSOCIATION XTREME CLE. 2.0 NJ CLE Credits. Charles Centinaro, Esq., Director of Attorney Ethics

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Transcription:

BEFORE THE SUPREME COURT COMMITTEE ON PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT PANEL A IN RE: DONALD W. COLSON ARKANSAS BAR ID No. 2005166 CPC Docket No. 2013-008 FINDINGS AND ORDER Donald W. Colson is an attorney licensed to practice law in 2005 in the State of Arkansas and was assigned Arkansas Bar Number 2005166. Mr. Colson was employed by Brenda Carol Reed to represent her in a bankruptcy matter. In February 2012, Ms. Reed met with Mr. Colson about a possible bankruptcy matter. Mr. Colson agreed to represent Ms. Reed and, while there was no written fee agreement, informed Ms. Reed that he would accept $1,000 as payment for his fees, which included a $306 Chapter 7 Bankruptcy filing fee. Ms. Reed completed the pre-bankruptcy credit counseling program and provided Mr. Colson with the information for him to complete the bankruptcy petition. On July 11, 2012, Mr. Colson filed the Chapter 7 Bankruptcy Petition on Ms. Reed s behalf. Ms. Reed s bankruptcy case was assigned case number 4:12-bk-14018. In August 2012, Ms. Reed received a notice from the Bankruptcy Court Clerk, stating that a Motion to Extend Time to Pay Filing Fee had been granted. Ms. Reed did not understand why she received the notice because Mr. Colson had been paid for the filing fee in February. Ms. Reed emailed Mr. Colson and asked about the Motion to Extend Time to Pay Filing Fee. Mr. Colson responded to the email by stating that [i]t just gives more time to pay. Ms. Reed replied by stating that she had already paid the fee. Mr. Colson responded to Ms. Reed by stating that [he] usually wait[ed] til after the meeting and pay at that time. On September 10, 2012, Ms. Reed s bankruptcy case was dismissed for failure to pay the

bankruptcy filing fee. As soon as Ms. Reed received the notice, she attempted to contact Mr. Colson but he did not respond to messages left by Ms. Reed. Ms. Reed also sent emails to Mr. Colson but Mr. Colson did not respond to the emails either. On October 1, 2012, Ms. Reed sent a letter to Judge Audrey Evans and explained to her what had happened concerning her bankruptcy case. Ms. Reed s letter was treated as a Motion to Reopen Chapter 7 case and Set Aside Dismissal. On November 15, 2012, a hearing was held before Judge Evans. Ms. Reed appeared at the hearing but Mr. Colson did not. Judge Evans reopened the bankruptcy proceeding and waived the payment of the filing fee. On November 15, 2012, a letter dated November 12, 2012, and written by Mr. Colson was filed in Ms. Reed s bankruptcy case. In the letter, Mr. Colson stated that he had been suspended from the practice of law for a period of three (3) years. Mr. Colson law license was suspended effective September 5, 2012, and this was the first notice Ms. Reed had received concerning Mr. Colson s suspension from the practice of law. A Formal Complaint was prepared by the Office of Professional Conduct. Pursuant to 9.A(2)(a) of the Procedures of the Arkansas Supreme Court Regulating Professional Conduct of Attorneys at Law ( Procedures ), a copy of the Formal Complaint was sent to Mr. Colson at his address of record with the Arkansas Supreme Court Clerk by certified, restricted delivery, return receipt mail. On March 11, 2013, Mr. Colson signed a receipt for the Formal Complaint. Pursuant to 9.B(1) of the Procedures, Mr. Colson had thirty days from March 11, 2013, to file a response to the Formal Complaint. Mr. Colson s response was due to be filed on or before April 12, 2013. No response was filed. Pursuant to 9.C(4) of the Procedures, failure to respond to a formal complaint shall constitute an admission of the factual allegations of the complaint and

shall extinguish a respondent s right to a public hearing. Upon consideration of the Formal Complaint and attached exhibits, the failure to respond and the resulting deemed admission of the factual allegations, and the Arkansas Rules of Professional Conduct, the Committee on Professional Conduct finds: 1. Donald W. Colson violated Rule 1.3 when he failed to file Ms. Reed s bankruptcy petition for a period of four (4) months after Ms. Reed had completed the necessary credit counseling and had paid Mr. Colson to file the petition on her behalf, and, when Mr. Colson failed to pay to the Bankruptcy Court Ms. Reed s filing fee after receiving the funds from Ms. Reed at the time of hire and well before he filed the bankruptcy proceeding. Rule 1.3 requires that a lawyer act with reasonable diligence and promptness in representing a client. 2. Donald W. Colson violated Rule 1.4(a)(4) when he failed to comply with requests for information left for him by Ms. Reed after she learned of the dismissal of her bankruptcy proceeding based on the failure to pay the filing fee, which Ms. Reed had months earlier delivered to Mr. Colson when she paid his fee for representation in the bankruptcy matter. Rule 1.4(a)(4) requires that a lawyer promptly comply with reasonable requests for information. 3. Donald W. Colson violated Rule 1.16(d) when, after his license to practice law in Arkansas was suspended, he failed to give Ms. Reed notice in a timely manner of the suspension of his license to practice law, and when he failed to return the filing fee to Ms. Reed or deliver it to the Bankruptcy Clerk. Rule 1.16(d) requires that upon termination of representation, a lawyer take steps to the extent reasonably practicable to protect a client s interests, such as giving reasonable notice to the client and refunding any advance payment of fee or expense that has not been earned or incurred.

4. Donald W. Colson violated Rule 8.4(c) when he accepted $1000 from Ms. Reed, a portion of which was to be paid to the bankruptcy Clerk for the filing fee in Ms. Reed s bankruptcy proceeding. Instead of paying the filing fee, which had been delivered to him by his client, Mr. Colson filed a request to pay the filing fee in installments which was dishonest as his client had already delivered the filing fee to him. Rule 8.4(c) requires that a lawyer not engage in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation. 5. Donald W. Colson violated Rule 8.4(d) when he failed to pay to the Bankruptcy Court Ms. Reed s filing fee though she had delivered those funds to him and the failure to pay the filing fee resulted in the dismissal of Ms. Reed s bankruptcy action. Rule 8.4(d) requires that a lawyer not engage in conduct that is prejudicial to the administration of justice. WHEREFORE, it is the decision and order of the Arkansas Supreme Court Committee on Professional Conduct, acting through its authorized Panel A, that the Arkansas law licenses of DONALD W. COLSON, Arkansas Bar No. 2005166, be, and hereby is, SUSPENDED for a period of forty-eight (48) months, directed to pay restitution in the amount of ONE THOUSAND DOLLARS ($1,000.00), and assessed costs in the amount of FIFTY DOLLARS ($50.00). The sanction imposed in this matter was enhanced based upon Mr. Colson s prior disciplinary history, as permitted by 19.A(12). In addition, DONALD W. COLSON, Arkansas Bar No. 2005166, is, pursuant to 9.C(1) and (3), REPRIMANDED for his failure to provide a written response to the Formal Complaint and is ordered to pay a fine in the amount of ONE THOUSAND DOLLARS ($1,000.00). All fines and costs assessed herein shall be payable by cashier s check or money order payable to the Clerk, Arkansas Supreme Court delivered to the Office of Professional Conduct, 2100 Riverfront Drive, Little Rock, Arkansas 72202, within

thirty (30) days of the date this Findings and Order is filed of record with the Clerk of the Arkansas Supreme Court. ARKANSAS SUPREME COURT COMMITTEE ON PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT - PANEL A By: /s/danyelle J. Walker, Chair, Panel A Date: June 6, 2013 Original filed with the Arkansas Supreme Court on July 9, 2013.