COMPLAINT. Plaintiff [PLAINTIFF] hereby sues the Defendants, [DEFENDANT #1], [DEFENDANT INTRODUCTION



Similar documents
CASE NO.: COMPLAINT. Plaintiff, [PLAINTIFF S NAME], by and through her parent and natural guardian

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION COMPLAINT

vs. JURY TRIAL DEMANDED COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL Plaintiff JAMES SCHAIRER, by and through undersigned counsel, hereby sues

CASE NO.: CIVIL DIVISION COMPLAINT. through undersigned counsel, and hereby sues Defendant, Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc., a Florida GENERAL ALLEGATIONS

How To Sue A Truck Driver For Causing A Car Accident In New Jersey

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 9 th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA

PLAINTIFF S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL. MYRIAM DEL SOCORRO LOPEZ, by and through his undersigned counsel, and files this First

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS COUNTY DEPARTMENT, LAW DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. COMPLAINT AT LAW COUNT ONE- NEGLIGENCE

AMENDED COMPLAINT. Plaintiff THOMAS J. BARRY hereby files this Complaint for damages against

COMPLAINT. COMES NOW the Plaintiffs, JERRY BYNUM, as Personal Representative of the Estate

Filing # Electronically Filed 12/29/ :48:06 PM

Case: 1:15-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 01/21/15 Page 1 of 5 PageID #:1

Filing # E-Filed 05/17/ :58:08 AM

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS COUNTY DEPARTMENT, LAW DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. COMPLAINT AT LAW

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 7 TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR VOLUSIA COUNTY, FLORIDA COMPLAINT FOR DISABILITY INSURANCE BENEFITS

AMENDED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO

IN THE THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, SALT LAKE COUNTY, UTAH

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF GREENE COUNTY, MISSOURI

CAUSE NO. JULIE TORBERT, as next friend of IN THE DISTRICT COURT PHILIP ORMSTON V. DENTON COUNTY, TEXAS

COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL. Plaintiff, TARIN SAROKA, individually, and as the Personal Representative of the

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY FLORIDA. Case No.

Authority for the County Attorney to Initiate Litigation in the Case of Pinellas County v. Verizon Florida, LLC

GRAY, L.L.C. 760 ROUTE 10 WEST, SUITE 203 WHIPPANY, NEW JERSEY PH: F: Attorneys for Plaintiff Henry Kent

IN THE THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, SALT LAKE COUNTY STATE OF UTAH. Case No. : Judge:

Plaintiffs, Defendants.

IN THE STATE COURT OF COBB COUNTY STATE OF GEORGIA VERIFIED COMPLAINT FOR PERSONAL INJURY DAMAGES AND DEMAND FOR TRIAL BY JURY

Case 1:15-cv GAO Document 1 Filed 07/23/15 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

COMPLAINT. Plaintiffs, Dileida Vizcaino and Norma Vizcaino, as Co-Personal Representatives of the

Complaint - Walmart Substance on Floor in Frozen Food Dept.

STATE OF INDIANA ) IN THE MARION COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT ) SS: COUNTY OF MARION ) CAUSE NO.:

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE ELEVENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA. v. CASE NO. COMPLAINT

Case 3:14-cv MMD-VPC Document 12-1 Filed 02/12/14 Page 1 of 14 EXHIBIT 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT

1416-CV Plaintiff is a resident of Jackson County, Missouri and is the biological mother of

COMPLAINT. Plaintiff, James Greiff, sues Defendants, Richard Alan Cahan, and Becker. Jurisdiction and Venue

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE THIRD CIRCUIT STATE OF HAWAII ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT FOR INJUNCTIVE AND OTHER RELIEF

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF BALDWIN COUNTY, ALABAMA * *

Case 3:10-cv DRD Document 31 Filed 05/05/11 Page 1 of 9

CASE NO.: C O M P L A I N T. Defendant, HARBOR HOUSE OF CENTRAL FLORIDA, INC., f/k/a Spouse Abuse, Inc., a/k/a

SIXTH AMENDED COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL GENERAL ALLEGATIONS

Attorney for Plaintiff SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES COUNTY CENTRAL DISTRICT STANLEY MOSK COURTHOUSE

PREVIEW PLEASE DO NOT COPY THIS DOCUMENT THANK YOU. LegalFormsForTexas.Com

Case Doc 1 Filed 04/07/15 Entered 04/07/15 11:42:31 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 13

FILED: NASSAU COUNTY CLERK 07/12/2013 INDEX NO /2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/12/2013

BARROW COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT STATE OF GEORGIA * * * * * * * * * * SUMMONS CASE NO.:

How To File A Lawsuit Against A Corporation In California

COBB COUNTY STATE COURT STATE OF GEORGIA * * * * * * * * * * SUMMONS CASE NO.:

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS COUNTY DEPARTMENT, LAW DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. COMPLAINT AT LAW

PREVIEW. 1. The following form may be used to file a personal injury lawsuit.

Case 1:14-cv WGY Document 1 Filed 05/16/14 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND

Baltimore, MD * The Corporation Trust Inc 351 West Camden Street * Baltimore, MD KATHLEEN WARD, M.D South Hanover Street *

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS SUMMIT COUNTY, OHIO. : v. : COMPLAINT FOR WRONGFUL : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : :

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION COMPLAINT. COMES NOW, the Plaintiff, JOSEPH DELFRATE, and sues the Defendant,

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF DEKALB COUNTY STATE OF GEORGIA

COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF GREENE COUNTY, MISSOURI

SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON FOR THURSTON COUNTY

Case 4:15-cv RH-CAS Document 1 Filed 03/17/15 Page 1 of 19 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION COMPLAINT FOR DISABILITY INSURANCE BENEFITS

TERRENCE and Marie Domin, Plaintiffs, v. SHELBY INSURANCE COMPANY, a foreign corporation, Defendant.

Case 9:15-cv JIC Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/19/2015 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA. Case No.

IN THE STATE COURT OF COBB COUNTY STATE OF GEORGIA

How To Pay $24.55 Million To A Paraplegic Woman

CAUSE NO. V. WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS. Defendant. JUDICIAL DISTRICT PLAINTIFFS ORIGINAL PETITION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT THE PARTIES

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF MOBILE COUNTY, ALABAMA. v. Civil Action No.:CL Plaintiff Demands Trial by Jury COMPLAINT

Case 4:09-cv RCC Document 1 Filed 09/04/09 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff,

No. Plaintiff Kelvin Bledsoe ( Plaintiff ), by his undersigned counsel, brings claims

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY DEFENDANT S ANSWER

Case 1:16-cv CBA-PK Document 1 Filed 01/21/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, WEST DISTRICT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

Case 2:10-cv JCM-LRL Document 1 Filed 07/22/10 Page 1 of 8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION ORIGINAL COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

Case 2:12-cv SRC-CLW Document 1 Filed 11/14/12 Page 1 of 5 PageID: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT

CASE 0:12-cv RHK-SER Document 1 Filed 11/02/12 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 01/17/2014 INDEX NO /2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/17/2014

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN MATEO GENERAL ALLEGATIONS

THE STATE OF MINNESOTA TO THE ABOVE-NAMED DEFENDANTS: the Complaint which is herewith served upon you within twenty (20) days after the service of

v. CASE NO.: VERIFIED COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES WITH REQUEST FOR EQUITABLE RELIEF AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

Case: 1:15-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 11/04/15 Page 1 of 10 PageID #:1

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JEFFERSON COUNTY, ALABAMA BIRMINGHAM DIVISION

Case 1:10-cv WGY Document 1 Filed 03/23/10 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

Case 3:14-cv HU Document 1 Filed 04/23/14 Page 1 of 12 Page ID#: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

Case 1:12-cv CMA Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/27/2012 Page 1 of 5

No. 45TH. Plaintiff EDGEWOOD INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT files its Original Petition

Transcription:

Form 2:40-2 Complaint Negligence, Motor Vehicle IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE ## JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR [COUNTY], FLORIDA [PLAINTIFF], Plaintiff, CASE NO.: ##-##### ## ## GENERAL JURISDICTION vs. [DEFENDANT #1], [DEFENDANT #2], and [DEFENDANT CORPORATION], a [STATE] corporation, Defendants. / COMPLAINT Plaintiff [PLAINTIFF] hereby sues the Defendants, [DEFENDANT #1], [DEFENDANT #2], and [DEFENDANT CORPORATION], and alleges as follows: 1. This is an action for negligence. INTRODUCTION 2. While operating a motor vehicle owned, maintained or controlled by [DEFENDANT #2] and hauling goods on behalf of [DEFENDANT CORPORATION], [DEFENDANT #1] caused a collision with [PLAINTIFF] s vehicle. As a result of [DEFENDANT #1] s negligent operation of the motor vehicle, [PLAINTIFF] suffered permanent injuries. 3. [DEFENDANT #1] is directly liable for [PLAINTIFF] s damages. 4. [DEFENDANT #2] is directly and vicariously liable for [PLAINTIFF] s damages. 5. [DEFENDANT CORPORATION] is directly and vicariously liable for

[PLAINTIFF] s damages. JURISDICTION AND VENUE 6. This Court has jurisdiction over this dispute because this complaint seeks damages in excess of $15,000.00 dollars, exclusive of interest and attorneys fees. 7. [DEFENDANT #1] is amenable to jurisdiction in Florida as he resides in [COUNTY], Florida. 8. [DEFENDANT #2] is amenable to jurisdiction in Florida as he resides in [COUNTY], Florida. 9. [DEFENDANT CORPORATION] is amenable to jurisdiction in Florida as it regularly conducts business in [COUNTY] and throughout Florida and maintains a [BUSINESS] in [COUNTY]. 10. Venue is proper in [COUNTY], Florida because the motor vehicle accident from which this cause of action arises occurred in [COUNTY], Florida. PARTIES 11. [PLAINTIFF] was, at all times material hereto, a resident of [COUNTY], Florida, was over the age of eighteen (18) years, and is otherwise sui juris. 12. [DEFENDANT #1] was, at all times material hereto, a resident of [COUNTY], Florida, and is otherwise sui juris. [DEFENDANT #1] is one of [DEFENDANT CORPORATION] s owner-operators, and he regularly performs [BUSINESS] on [DEFENDANT CORPORATION] s behalf. 13. [DEFENDANT #2] was, at all times material hereto, a resident of [COUNTY], Florida, and is otherwise sui juris. 14. [DEFENDANT CORPORATION] is a [STATE] corporation engaged in

[BUSINESS] in [COUNTY], throughout Florida, and nationwide. GENERAL ALLEGATIONS 15. At all times material, [DEFENDANT #1] was the operator of a [YEAR] truck tractor vehicle bearing the Florida license plate number ###### and bearing a motor carrier placard in the name of [DEFENDANT CORPORATION] bearing [DEFENDANT CORPORATION] s Federal Motor Carrier Number ###### and its United States Department of Transportation Number ###### ( the Subject Vehicle ). The subject vehicle was an instrumentality that is peculiarly dangerous in its operation. 16. At all times material, [DEFENDANT #2] owned, maintained and controlled the Subject Vehicle. The subject vehicle was an instrumentality that is peculiarly dangerous in its operation. 17. At all times material, the Subject Vehicle was being used for the purpose of [BUSINESS] at the direction of [DEFENDANT CORPORATION], on [DEFENDANT CORPORATION] s behalf, and under the motor carrier authority granted to [DEFENDANT CORPORATION] by the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, a division of the United States Department of Transportation. The Subject Vehicle was an instrumentality that is peculiarly dangerous in its operation. 18. On [DATE], and at all times material, [DEFENDANT #1], [DEFENDANT #2], and [DEFENDANT CORPORATION] owed a duty to exercise reasonable care in the ownership, operation, maintenance, control and/or use of the Subject Vehicle for the benefit of other individuals on the public roadways. 19. On [DATE], Plaintiff was traveling [DIRECTION] on [STREET] in [LANE]. 20. Defendant [DEFENDANT #1] was also traveling [DIRECTION] on [STREET]

directly behind Plaintiff s vehicle. 21. With [DEFENDANT #2] s knowledge and consent, [DEFENDANT #1] negligently operated the subject vehicle and caused an accident when [DEFENDANT #1] attempted to change lanes and, as a result, collided with Plaintiff s vehicle. 22. Plaintiff s vehicle sustained substantial damage. 23. [DESCRIPTION OF PLAINTIFF S INJURIES]. COUNT I- NEGLIGENCE (As to [DEFENDANT #1]) 24. Plaintiff realleges the allegations set forth above in paragraphs one (1) through twenty-three (23) as if set forth herein in full. 25. On [DATE], and at all times material, [DEFENDANT #1] was in possession, custody and control of the Subject Vehicle. 26. At all material times, [DEFENDANT #1] owed a duty to exercise reasonable care in the ownership, operation and/or use of the Subject Vehicle for the benefit of other individuals on public roadways. 27. At all material times, [DEFENDANT #1] breached his duty of care to other individuals on the above-described public roadways, and in particular to Plaintiff, as he was negligent and careless in the ownership, operation and/or maintenance and/or use of the Subject Vehicle. 28. [DEFENDANT #1], was negligent in his: a. Failure to operate the subject vehicle in a safe and reasonable manner; b. Failure to operate the subject vehicle in compliance with state and local traffic laws; c. Failure to keep an adequate and proper lookout;

d. Failure to stop for vehicles in the road; e. Failure to avoid the collision with Plaintiff s vehicle; and f. Other acts of negligence to be determined through discovery. 29. As a direct, foreseeable, and proximate result of [DEFENDANT #1] s negligence, [DESCRIBE PLAINTIFF S INJURIES]. 30. As a further direct and proximate result of [DEFENDANT #1] s negligence, Plaintiff has incurred medical expenses for his care and treatment in an effort to alleviate and cure his injuries, and will continue to incur additional expenses in the future. 31. [DEFENDANT #1] damaged Plaintiff s vehicle. WHEREFORE, [PLAINTIFF] demands judgment for damages against [DEFENDANT #1] in excess of the minimal jurisdictional limits of this Court, as well as post-judgment interest and the costs of bringing this action as allowed by law, and any other relief this Honorable Court deems just and proper. COUNT II- NEGLIGENCE (As to [DEFENDANT #2]) 32. Plaintiff realleges the allegations set forth above in paragraphs one (1) through twenty-three (23) as if set forth herein in full. 33. On [DATE], and at all times material, [DEFENDANT #2] was in possession, custody and/or control of the Subject Vehicle. 34. At all material times, [DEFENDANT #2] owed a duty to exercise reasonable care in the ownership, operation and/or use of the subject vehicle for the benefit of other individuals on public roadways. 35. At all material times, [DEFENDANT #2] breached his duty of care to other individuals on the above described public roadways, and in particular to Plaintiff, as he was

negligent and careless in the ownership, operation and/or maintenance and/or use of the Subject Vehicle. 36. [DEFENDANT #2] was negligent, individually and/or through the conduct of [DEFENDANT #1], in his: a. Failure to operate the subject vehicle in a safe and reasonable manner; b. Failure to operate the subject vehicle in compliance with state and local traffic laws; c. Failure to keep an adequate and proper lookout; d. Failure to stop for vehicles in the road; e. Failure to avoid the collision with Plaintiff s vehicle; and f. Other acts of negligence to be determined through discovery. 37. As a direct, foreseeable, and proximate result of [DEFENDANT #2] s negligence, [DESCRIBE PLAINTIFF S INJURIES]. 38. As a further direct and proximate result of [DEFENDANT #2] s negligence, Plaintiff has incurred medical expenses for his care and treatment in an effort to alleviate and cure his injuries, and will continue to incur additional expenses in the future. 39. [DEFENDANT #2], individually and through the conduct of [DEFENDANT #1], damaged Plaintiff s vehicle. WHEREFORE, [PLAINTIFF] demands judgment for damages against [DEFENDANT #2] in excess of the minimal jurisdictional limits of this Court, as well as post-judgment interest and the costs of bringing this action as allowed by law, and any other relief this Honorable Court deems just and proper. COUNT III- NEGLIGENCE (As to [DEFENDANT CORPORATION])

40. Plaintiff realleges the allegations set forth above in paragraphs one (1) through twenty-three (23) as if set forth herein in full. 41. On [DATE], and at all times material, the Subject Vehicle was being used by [DEFENDANT #1] while engaging in [BUSINESS ACTIVITY] at the direction of [DEFENDANT CORPORATION], on [DEFENDANT CORPORATION] s behalf, and under the motor carrier authority granted to [DEFENDANT CORPORATION] by the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration. 42. At all material times, [DEFENDANT CORPORATION] owed a duty to exercise reasonable care in the operation and/or use of the subject vehicle for the benefit of other individuals on public roadways. 43. At all material times, [DEFENDANT CORPORATION] breached its duty of care to other individuals on the above described public roadways, and in particular to Plaintiff, it was negligent and careless in the operation and/or maintenance and/or use of the Subject Vehicle. 44. [DEFENDANT CORPORATION] was negligent, directly and/or through the conduct of [DEFENDANT #1]. 45. As a direct, foreseeable, and proximate result of [DEFENDANT CORPORATION] s negligence, [DESCRIBE PLAINTIFF S INJURIES]. 46. As a further direct and proximate result of [DEFENDANT CORPORATION] s negligence, Plaintiff has incurred medical expenses for his care and treatment in an effort to alleviate and cure his injuries, and will continue to incur additional expenses in the future. 47. [DEFENDANT CORPORATION], directly and through the conduct of [DEFENDANT #1], damaged Plaintiff s vehicle. WHEREFORE, [PLAINTIFF] demands judgment for damages against [DEFENDANT

CORPORATION] in excess of the minimal jurisdictional limits of this Court, as well as postjudgment interest and the costs of bringing this action as allowed by law, and any other relief this Honorable Court deems just and proper. DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL Plaintiff demands a trial by jury of all issues so triable. DATED THIS [DATE]. Respectfully Submitted,