Preventing Health Care Fraud



Similar documents
Preventing Healthcare Fraud through Predictive Modeling. Category: Improving State Operations

EMDEON PAYMENT INTEGRITY SERVICES

Implementing a New Technology: FPS Successes, Challenges, and Best Practices

Medicaid Fraud Prevention & Detection

Report to Congress Fraud Prevention System Second Implementation Year

The Predictive Fraud and Abuse Analytic and Risk Management System

THE FRAUD PREVENTION SYSTEM IDENTIFIED MILLIONS IN MEDICARE SAVINGS, BUT THE DEPARTMENT COULD STRENGTHEN SAVINGS DATA

From Chase to Prevention. Stopping Healthcare Fraud Before it Happens

The Informatica Solution for Improper Payments

WHITE PAPER. Payment Integrity Trends: What s A Code Worth. A White Paper by Equian

modern Payment Integrity the race to pre-payment White paper

Combating Fraud, Waste and Abuse

Data Analytic Capabilities Assessment for Medicaid Program Integrity

MDaudit Compliance made easy. MDaudit software automates and streamlines the auditing process to improve productivity and reduce compliance risk.

Maximize savings with an enterprise payment integrity strategy

Stopping the Flow of Health Care Fraud with Technology, Data and Analytics

MEDICARE RECOVERY AUDIT CONTRACTORS AND CMS S ACTIONS TO ADDRESS IMPROPER PAYMENTS, REFERRALS OF POTENTIAL FRAUD, AND PERFORMANCE

Program Integrity in Government Transforming Data to Useful Information: Using Analytics to Detect and Prevent Improper Payments May 2013

Combating Fraud, Waste and Abuse

Medicare Program; Pre-Claim Review Demonstration for Home Health Services. AGENCY: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS.

TITLE: Massachusetts Executive Office of Health and Human Services Virtual Gateway

CASE STUDY: St. Joseph Medical Center. Compliance 360 GRC Software Suite

GAO FRAUD DETECTION SYSTEMS. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Needs to Ensure More Widespread Use. Report to Congressional Requesters

PREDICTIVE ANALYTICS IN FRAUD

Research Brief: Insurers Efforts to Prevent Health Care Fraud

SAS Fraud Framework for Health Care Evolution and Learnings

ME DIC BENEFIT INTEGRITY ACTIVITIES IN MEDICARE PARTS C AND D

Combining Financial Management and Collections to Increase Revenue and Efficiency

U.S. Department of Justice Office of the Inspector General. Improving the Grant Management Process

Using Predictive Analytics to Detect Contract Fraud, Waste, and Abuse Case Study from U.S. Postal Service OIG

Pre-Payment Fraud Detection and its Impact on the Bottom Line

Presentation to the Senate Finance Medicaid Subcommittee: Prevention and Detection of Fraud, Waste and Abuse

Do Not Pay Agency Implementation Guide For Treasury s Working System. December 2014

How Eastern Bank Uses Big Data to Better Serve & Protect its Customers!

FRAUD PREVENTION & DETECTION IN PARTICIPANT DIRECTION PROGRAMS HCBS Conference Wednesday, September 11, :30-9:45am

Recognize the many faces of fraud

ON Semiconductor identified the following critical needs for its solution:

VERISIGN DDoS PROTECTION SERVICES CUSTOMER HANDBOOK

Medicare Fraud, Waste, and Abuse Training for Healthcare Professionals

The Facets of Fraud. A layered approach to fraud prevention

Warranty Fraud Detection & Prevention

Introduction. By Santhosh Patil, Infogix Inc.

Special Investigations Unit (SIU) Coding and Auditing of Behavioral Health Services

AGA Kansas City Chapter Data Analytics & Continuous Monitoring

VA Office of Inspector General

Detect, Prevent, and Deter Fraud in Big Data Environments

The Role of Oversight and Monitoring and the Use of Analytics to Increase Effectiveness of your Compliance Program

THE MEDICARE-MEDICAID (MEDI-MEDI) DATA MATCH PROGRAM

Leveraging MITA to Implement Service Oriented Architecture and Enterprise Data Management. Category: Cross Boundary Collaboration

Product. Onboard Advisor Minimize Account Risk Through a Single, Integrated Onboarding Solution

Business Information Services. Product overview

Solutions For. Information, Insights, and Analysis to Help Manage Business Challenges

CMS AND ITS CONTRACTORS HAVE ADOPTED FEW PROGRAM INTEGRITY PRACTICES TO ADDRESS VULNERABILITIES IN EHRS

The New Reality of Synthetic ID Fraud How to Battle the Leading Identity Fraud Tactic in The Digital Age

Treasury Inspector General Tax Administration (TIGTA)

WHITEPAPER. Complying with the Red Flag Rules and FACT Act Address Discrepancy Rules

Official Audit Report Issued April 20, 2016

Supporting HR Transformation with PeopleSoft HelpDesk for Human Resources

Profit from Big Data flow. Hospital Revenue Leakage: Minimizing missing charges in hospital systems

Current Challenges. Predictive Analytics: Answering the Age-Old Question, What Should We Do Next?

OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL

How To Optimize Your Wholesale Business

6 Critical Impact Factors of Health Reform on Revenue Cycle Management Pyramid Healthcare Solutions Thought Leadership Series

UPDATED. Special Advisory Bulletin on the Effect of Exclusion from Participation in Federal Health Care Programs

Identity Theft and Tax Administration

Bend the administrative cost curve with payment integrity best practices

The Financial Case for EHR/RCM Integration. White Paper. The Power of Clinically Driven Revenue Cycle Management. Presented by

Strategically Detecting And Mitigating Employee Fraud

The Power of Risk, Compliance & Security Management in SAP S/4HANA

SAS. Fraud Management. Overview. Real-time scoring of all transactions for fast, accurate fraud detection. Challenges PRODUCT BRIEF

WELFARE FRAUD PREVENTION ACT. Section 1. Definitions. For purposes of this Act, the following definitions apply:

SOCIAL MEDIA LISTENING AND ANALYSIS Spring 2014

CORPORATE COMPLIANCE: BILLING & CODING COMPLIANCE

Attack Intelligence: Why It Matters

Understanding the effects of fraud and abuse on your group benefits plan

ElegantJ BI. White Paper. Operational Business Intelligence (BI)

IBM Analytical Decision Management

Transcription:

Preventing Health Care Fraud Project: Predictive Modeling for Fraud Detection at MassHealth Category: Improving State Operations Commonwealth of Massachusetts Executive Office of Health and Human Services Sandra Edler Commonwealth of Massachusetts Information Technology Division One Ashburton Place, Room 804 Boston, MA 02108 Phone: 617.626.4620 Email: sandra.edler@state.ma.us Project Initiated: July 2012 Project Completed: May 2013

Executive Summary Fraud, waste, and abuse in Medicaid programs represent a significant and ongoing challenge for government at both the state and federal levels. Estimates put the cost to taxpayers each year in the billions of dollars. Historically, to address the problem of health care providers overbilling and otherwise submitting false claims, states have relied on a pay-and-chase model. In this approach, states first pay providers for claims filed, then conduct follow-up work to identify instances of fraud. In cases where fraud has occurred, states then expend efforts to recoup overpayments made to providers. MassHealth, as Massachusetts s Department of Medicaid is known, provides health care coverage to 1.4 million residents and processes ~65 million claims per year across a network of 40,000 providers. In keeping with the traditional pay-and-chase model, MassHealth actively conducts post-payment reviews of claims. The Commonwealth s Executive Office of Health and Human Services (EOHHS) and MassHealth sought an innovative way to enhance our robust traditional efforts with a proactive and preventative approach. We aimed to employ real-time analysis to claims with the goal of stopping suspect billing before payment, similar to the type of fraud prevention employed by private sector financial and credit card companies. When EOHHS determined that no other state in the nation had implemented a prepayment, predictive approach for this purpose, we decided to be the first. As a result, we worked with a vendor with the appropriate technology but no healthcare experience to adapt, integrate, and roll out the first-of-its-kind predictive modeling and fraud detection system for health care provider claims. Today, all MassHealth claims are subjected to sophisticated analytics prior to payment, enabling us to identify suspicious claims and billing patterns in near-real time. The system: Detects, prevents, and decreases improper payments associated with fraud; Increases the efficiency of our state s claims processing operations; Identifies inconsistencies and errors, as well as needed enhancements, within the claims processing and related systems; and Improves the state s ability to identify and mitigate early potential payment risks and program vulnerabilities in the Medicaid program. Payments to providers suspected of fraud or abuse are frozen until the claims are investigated and resolved. Since launch of the system, MassHealth has prevented payment of an estimated half-million dollars in fraudulent claims. Another $2 million in post-payment recoveries has been expedited by the system s advanced functionality. Massachusetts: Preventing Health Care Fraud 2 of 7

Business Problem and Solution Description Business Problem Massachusetts s Medicaid Management Information System (MMIS) underpins the work of our MassHealth program, which processes ~65 million claims per year across a network of 40,000 providers in the course of delivering health care coverage to 1.4 million residents. In keeping with the traditional pay-and-chase model employed by states to detect health care fraud, state employees examine claims after they have been paid using a random selection process, searching for fraud patterns on their own, and following up on tips they receive. EOHHS sought to augment MassHealth s post-payment review process with proactive work to detect and prevent fraud, waste, and abuse before it could occur. The goal was a system that would enhance our ability to identify claims that were inappropriately billed before payment and lead us to providers engaging in suspect behavior. To gain a better understanding of how other states use technology to tackle this challenge, EOHHS reached out to the Medicaid agencies of the forty-nine other states. We learned that no other state Medicaid agencies had already addressed this challenge with the innovative use of technology. By early in 2012, a handful of states had issued related requests for information, but we were unable to identify a state that had progressed to the point of issuing a request for responses, let alone implemented a pre-payment, predictive modeling solution. The Solution EOHHS and MassHealth issued a request for quotes in April of 2012 to solicit proposals for a pre-payment predictive modeling solution that would integrate with our existing MassHealth MMIS claims processing system, analyze MassHealth claims data, and provide real-time or near real-time fraud detection. In July of 2012, the Commonwealth contracted with Dynamic Research Corporation vendor to integrate a predictive modeling solution into our existing MassHealth system. The solution is founded on technology capable of deploying algorithms and analytical processes to examine claims by member, provider, service, and other attributes with the goal of identifying and assigning an alert and risk score that prioritizes claims for further review. How it Works The integrated system uses sophisticated algorithms and social networking analysis to analyze all claims as soon as they are submitted to the system by healthcare providers for payment. Massachusetts: Preventing Health Care Fraud 3 of 7

The system analyzes against a wealth of data not previously accessible through one tool, including public information and state and federal data, including the state s master death file and the Office of Inspector General s provider exclusion list. If someone has died or a health care provider has been excluded (from eligibility for payment) for example, that information will be factored into pre-payment review of the claim, instead of waiting for post-payment review. As claims enter the MMIS, they are checked against rules which allow for automatic payment, denial, or suspension for review. The system flags suspicious or high-risk claims and re-directs them to a team of specialized analysts which reviews each claim and provider via an interactive web-based user interface. If reviewers determine that the claim is legitimate, they approve it and release it back into the system for prompt payment. If reviewers determine that a claim should be denied, they attach a denial reason code, which is used in tracking and reporting to minimize potential future fraud. When fraud is suspected, EOHHS works collaboratively with state investigators and law enforcement as appropriate to seek resolution. System Capabilities and Functionality The system successfully underwent rigorous testing, including unit testing, user testing, parallel testing, performance testing, security vulnerability testing, and ADA testing. It meets the Commonwealth s robust accessibility and security requirements. Additional highlights of the system s capabilities and functionality include its ability to: Use statistically sound, empirically-derived predictive modeling technologies designed to prevent improper payments of high risk and suspect claims and identify suspect relationships, patterns, trends, and billing behavior; Integrate seamlessly into the existing MassHealth MMIS claims processing system, ensuring no undue disruption in the processing of claims; Optimize itself genetically for improved performance maximizing accuracy and minimizing incidences of false positives and false negatives through continuous validation, recalibration of scoring models, and regular updates through a feedback loop; Provide workflow management tools for users to systematically track scores, reason codes, and actions for transactions scored as high-risk; and Provide tracking and reporting features with metrics designed to reconcile claims and evaluate and measure performance. The federal government welcomed the proposed project as a forerunner in states approach to reducing healthcare fraud and provided funding for the bulk of the project s cost. Of the total $6.9 million cost, federal funds were used for $6 million with the Massachusetts: Preventing Health Care Fraud 4 of 7

Commonwealth assuming responsibility for the remaining $900,000. As with the state s overarching MMIS, ongoing maintenance and support of the predictive modeling and fraud detection solution will be funded through a combination of federal and state funds. Fraud Detection in Action An Example In one instance, a provider submitted a claim that billed two codes. Such a situation can be allowable, but only in certain circumstances. The claim was flagged for review. Upon review, it was determined that one of the codes was for a higher-cost office visit entitling the provider to a higher rate of reimbursement which superseded the second cost, rendering it not allowed. MassHealth took immediate action and denied the claim, preventing payment. Research into this particular claim led not only to denial of that specific claim, but to identification of a pattern of behavior across a number of providers. By relying solely on the traditional pay-and-chase method, we would not have discovered this fraud and others like it until at least a year after such claims were paid. We would have paid providers perpetrating fraud and then, assuming each instance was retroactively caught, we would have attempted to recoup payments after the fact. Thanks to our system s advanced capabilities, in this case we prevented one specific instance of fraud and gained insight that informs prevention of future fraud attempts. Significance of the Project Healthcare fraud, waste, and abuse cost taxpayers billions of dollars each year. When fraud is perpetrated by health care providers by billing for tests or other services not delivered, for example it can put the health of intended beneficiaries at risk. Inappropriate payments further strain federal and state budgets already impacted by ever-increasing health care costs across the nation. The impact of such losses is exacerbated by the growing number of people served by these programs; due to the economic downturn and the mandate of the Affordable Care Act, enrollments in state Medicaid programs have increased in recent years. The project embodies a number of the State CIO priorities identified by NASCIO, from optimizing existing services to focusing on budget and cost control, as well as health care. By creating a model that other states can follow, the Commonwealth s work also represents a meaningful step forward in helping the federal government reduce health care fraud nationwide. This project builds upon the strong program integrity measures already built into the state s MassHealth system. Instead of waiting for post-payment analysis to detect anomalies and suspicious behavior however, we are now able to prevent overpayment before it happens. Massachusetts: Preventing Health Care Fraud 5 of 7

As a result, the Commonwealth has evolved from a strictly pay and chase model to one that incorporates both prevention and more timely and robust post-payment recovery. We can now identify providers engaging in inappropriate or fraudulent behavior earlier in the process and prevent them from carrying out fraudulent activity. EOHHS has a robust partnership with law enforcement partners who investigate and prosecute member and provider fraud. Through our partnership and collaborative work coupled with the innovative use of advanced technology we continue to build public trust in the Commonwealth s MassHealth and better safeguard public funds while promoting the health and well-being of MassHealth members. Benefit of the Project In Massachusetts, health care providers conduct ~90% of their day-to-day business online with MassHealth through our MMIS. A range of services from adjudicating claims from providers to transacting reimbursements and maintaining member files is delivered through the system in near real-time. Each year, we process ~65 million feefor service claims; each of those claims now passes through the predictive modeling and fraud detection solution that enhances our MMIS. Reducing Health Care Fraud and Safeguarding Public Funds Since launching our predictive modeling solution, the Commonwealth has for the first time proactively prevented payment of approximately one-half million dollars. Thanks to the system s advanced analytics, we have also enhanced and sped up our post-payment work and expedited recovery of approximately $2 million. As the system is refined and continually learns from the information it gathers, we expect the levels of both prevented payments and expedited post-payment recoveries to increase over time. This important work has a direct and positive impact on a number of beneficiaries, from the federal and state government levels to healthcare providers and constituents who rely on their services. By limiting the ability of potential fraudsters, MassHealth ensures that funds are not misdirected, keeping costs down and helping to ensure that constituents receive the care they need from providers who bill appropriately. Highlights of additional business benefits delivered through use of the system follow: Enables Compliance with Federal Prompt Payment Rules: Because the system provides a rapid, real-time, or near-real-time solution, it limits the amount of manual effort and review time needed for each suspect claims, enabling MassHealth to conform to federal Prompt Payment regulations; Greater Visibility: It allows MassHealth unprecedented visibility into data and data analysis so that patterns of excessive usage, unusual patterns, and comparisons to peers are identified, scored, and addressed rapidly; Massachusetts: Preventing Health Care Fraud 6 of 7

Fast Feedback: It provides a user friendly feedback loop for analysts to enter the final resolution of high risk and suspect claims into the system. When reviewers determine a claim is appropriate for payment, it quickly reenters the claims process so there is no disruption in the release of payment; and Continuous Learning: The system quickly accommodates modifications and enhancements via a change control process that reacts to changing patterns of behavior. It builds profiles of providers with suspicious billing patterns; inherent learning and genetic features of the solution enhance its performance and accuracy over time. In the absence of these sophisticated capabilities, MassHealth would forgo opportunities in proactive fraud detection, prevention of loss, and more rapid resolution. Although the predictive analytics solution is not a cure-all for the elimination of fraud, it identifies risk which allows us to take necessary steps toward stopping fraudulent behavior before it costs the state money. The system puts data in the driver s seat and empowers staff to take proactive corrective action. Moving the Commonwealth Forward As we continue to build the system, we are adding new detection scenarios and data sources to further strengthen its capabilities. Increasingly, healthcare providers and members who attempt to take advantage of the MassHealth program will not succeed. In short, the project improves program integrity while lowering operational cost through increased efficiencies and proactive fraud detection. The Commonwealth estimates that the initial investment in the system will be recouped within the first two to three years following implementation. The project also represents a repeatable implementation model from which other states can benefit. By leveraging advanced technology and collaboration among state partners, the Commonwealth is taking an unprecedented step forward in reducing healthcare fraud. For the first time, MassHealth can stop the cycle of pay-and-chase by blocking the payment of suspicious claims before the check goes out the door. Thanks to this innovative technology, we are ensuring that health care benefits are delivered appropriately and efficiently and are available for those who need them most. Massachusetts: Preventing Health Care Fraud 7 of 7