"Computer Science in Context" and "Learning Fields" in Vocational Computer Science Education Two Unlike Siblings? Simone Opel & Torsten Brinda 1 Didactics of Informatics University of Duisburg-Essen
Agenda 1. Motivation 2. Criteria-Orientated Comparison 3. Results of Comparison 4. Proposed General Model for Contextualised Computer Science Education 5. Conclusion and Outlook 2
General and Vocational CSE General secondary education: Vocational schools of the dual vocational education system : CS as non-mandatory school subject in most federal states of Germany Curricular concepts and contents depend on the respective federal state Common aim: Education for attending university (grammar school) or vocational education (general/ intermediate sec. school) Competence-based and output-orientated curricula No descriptions of or demands for teaching methods or didactical approaches Part of mandatory secondary school system Several professions in computer science e.g. computer specialists Aims: Gaining theoretical skills and knowledge about their profession Acquiring a deep knowledge in all technologies of the training company Preparing the students for the challenges of their profession and lifelong learning The curriculum Consists of learning fields Describes outcomes of learning processes Demands activity-orientated teaching methods 3
CSiC and LFCS Two Contextualised Approaches Computer Science in Context (CSiC) General education Contexts from everyday life of the students Learning Field-orientated Computer Science Education (LFCS) Vocational Education Contexts from professional life of the students Common Aspects Principle of contextualisation Current lack of high-quality teaching units Goal Combining both approaches to benefit from each other Developing the requirements for a general model of contextualised computer science education 4
Necessary Aspects Resulting Criteria A Criteria-Orientated Comparison Examination of respective competency models Examination of theoretical approaches Contextualisation and transfer into teaching units Inclusion of organisational and curricular aspects Target group, obligation and foundation in curriculum Underlying theoretical principles and concepts Underlying competency model Orientation on standards and superordinated aims Contextualisation of teaching units 5
Results of Comparison - Accordance Development of material is seen as a task for teams of teachers Contexts would lead to a higher level of motivation and interest would help to connect the knowledge to its application should be multidimensional and interdisciplinary Different guidelines and proposals exist, but could be improved 6
Result of Comparison - Differences Target Group Obligation Basis for Contextualisation Underlying Competence Model CSiC General secondary computer science education Voluntary teaching concept Idea of situated cognition Everyday life or social environment Indirectly based on cognitiontheoretical model by Weinert Personal disposition and knowledge base, shown as measurable performance Domainspecific and outputorientated LFCS Vocational computer science education Compulsory curricular concept Based on activityorientation LFCS has broader theoretical basis Professional life, uses realistic working processes Based on actiontheoretical outcomeorientated competency model by Roth Competency consists of several holistic dimensions Representation of a hypothetical definetion to classify students action 7
Proposed General Model 8
Proposed General Model - Requirements Theoretical foundation Selection of basic concepts of computer science Systematic selection of relevant topics Inclusion of existing ideas, standards and conceptual frameworks from CSE Suitable competency model Fundamental aspect of the model Basis: multidimensional structural model with holistic view on competencies provided by LFCS Competency levels have to be added following existing staged models Additional elements Set of criteria for selecting contexts o o o Independent of vocational or general education Supports decision making whether a context is suitable or not Opportunity to expand the set by specialised criteria for vocational or general education Collection of guidelines (not inherent part of the model) o o Supports transfer of the idea into teaching units Supports transfer from vocational to general CS education and vice versa 9
Proposed General Model - Application Main purpose: Enabling a comprehensible and theory-based development of contextualised teaching units Each idea has to be reviewed Rejection or Acceptance as suitable for implementation Guidelines support implementation process Definition of the work flow Offering validation checks Offering further resources Result: Complete description of a contextualised teaching unit or learning situation 10
Conclusion and Outlook CSiC vs. LFCS Both approaches are very different Most important common aspect: contextualisation of teaching Definition of the requirements for a theory-based model has been successful Next steps: Integration into a formal model description Evaluation by applying on existing teaching material of both approaches Extension for higher education is conceivable 11
Any Questions? Contact Information Simone Opel University of Duisburg-Essen Didactics of Informatics Schützenbahn 70, 45127 Essen http://udue.de/ddi/ 12
Literature 1. R. Bader. Das Lernfeld-Konzept in den Rahmenlehrplänen (German). Die berufsbildende Schule, 50(7-8):211-213, 1998. 2. R. Bareiss and M. Griss. A story-centered, learn-by-doing approach to software engineering education. In Proceedings of the 39th SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, SIGCSE '08, pages 221{225, New York, NY, USA, 2008. ACM. 3. H. Beek, P. Binstadt, E. M. Hertle, H.-H. Kremer, P. F. E. Sloane, and A. Zöller. Abschlussbericht. BLK Modellversuch "Neue Unterrichtsstrukturen und Lernkonzepte durch berufliches Lernen in Lernfeldern" NELE (German), 2003. 4. T. Brinda, H. Puhlmann, and C. Schulte. Bridging ict and cs - educational standards for computer science in lower secondary education. In Proceedings of the 2009 Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education (ITiCSE'09), pages 288-292, 2009. 5. I. Diethelm and C. Dörge. From context to competencies. In N. Reynolds and M. Turcsanyi-Szabo, editors, Key Competencies in the Knowledge Society, volume 324 of IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, pages 67-77. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2010. 6. I. Diethelm, J. Koubek, and H. Witten. IniK - Informatik im Kontext (German). LOG IN, (169/170):97-105, 2011. 7. D. Engbring. Einige Anmerkungen zum Begriff IniK (German). In I. Diethelm, C. Dörge, C. Hildebrandt, and C. Schulte, editors, Proceedings of 6th German Workshop in Primary and Secondary Computing Education, pages 119-124, Bonn, 2010. Köllen. 8. European Commission. Evaluation of the european qualication framework (EQF), 12 2013. 9. M. Fischer and W. Bauer. Competing approaches towards work process orientation in German curriculum development. European journal of vocational training, 40(2007/1):140-157, 2007. 10. Gesellschaft für Informatik (GI). Grundsätze und Standards für die Informatik in der Schule: Bildungsstandards Informatik für die Sekundarstufe I. Number 150/151. Log In, 2008. 11. A. Gramm, M. Hornung, and H. Witten. Email for you (only?): Design and implementation of a context-based learning process on internetworking and cryptography. In Proceedings of the 7th Workshop in Primary and Secondary Computing Education, WiPSCE '12, pages 116-124, New York, NY, USA, 2012. ACM. 12. H. Gudjons. Handlungsorientiert lehren und lernen. Schüleraktivierung. Selbsttätigkeit. Projektarbeit (German). Klinkhardt, Bad Heilbrunn, 6nd edition, 2000. 13. J. Koubek, C. Schulte, P. Schulze, and H. Witten. Informatik im Kontext. ein integratives Unterrichtskonzept für den Informatikunterricht (German). In B. Körber, editor, Proceedings of the 2009 German Conference on Informatics and Schools (INFOS 2009), pages 268-279, Bonn, 2009. Köllen. 14. H. Kremer and P. Sloane. Lernfelder Implementieren (German). Eusl, Paderborn, 2001. 15. D. B. Larkins, J. C. Moore, L. J. Rubbo, and L. R. Covington. Application of the cognitive apprenticeship framework to a middle school robotics camp. In Proceeding of the 44th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, SIGCSE '13, pages 89-94, New York, NY, USA, 2013. ACM. 13
Literature 16. B. Linck, L. Ohrndorf, S. Schubert, P. Stechert, J. Magenheim, W. Nelles, J. Neugebauer, and N. Schaper. Competence model for informatics modelling and system comprehension. In Global Engineering Education Conference, Berlin, 2013. 17. A. Maschmann. Zur Umsetzung des Lernfeld-Konzepts im Kontext fächersystematischer Schulorganisation (German). lernen & lehren, (2):64-70, 2013. 18. Ministerium für Schule und Weiterbildung des Landes Nordrhein-Westfalen. Kernlehrplan für die Sekundarstufe II Gymnasium / Gesamtschule (German), 2013. 19. S. Opel and T. Brinda. Learning Fields in Vocational IT Education - How Teachers Interpret the Concept. In I. Diethelm and R. T. Mittermeir, editors, ISSEP 2013, LNCS 7780), pages 147-158, Heidelberg, 2013. Springer. 20. S. Opel, A. Höp, and T. Brinda. Practical implementation of learning elds in vocational it/cs education - a guideline on designing learning situations. In M. Caspersen, R. Romeike, and M. Knobelsdorf, editors, Proceedings of 8th Workshop in Primary and Secondary Computing Education (WiPSCE 2013), New York, NY, USA, 2013. ACM. 21. I. Parchmann, C. Gräsel, A. Baer, P. Nentwig, R. Demuth, B. Ralle, and the ChiK Projekt Group. Chemie im Kontext - a symbiotic implementation of a context-based teaching and learning approach. International Journal of Science Education, 28(9), 2006. 22. A. Riedl and A. Schelten. Handlungsorientiertes lernen in technischen Lernfeldern (German). In R. Bader and P. Sloane, editors, Lernen in Lernfeldern. Theoretische Analysen und Gestaltungsansätze zum Lernfeldkonzept, pages 155-164, Markt Schwaben, 2000. Eusl. 23. H. Roth. Pädagogische Anthropologie (German). Schroedel, Hannover, 1971. 24. H. Schecker and I. Parchmann. Standards and competence models: The German situation, chapter 8. Waxmann, Mnster, 2007. 25. Sekretariat der ständigen Konferenz der Länder in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Handreichung für die Erarbeitung von Rahmenlehrplänen der Kultusministerkonferenz für den berufsbezogenen Unterricht in der Berufsschule und ihre Abstimmung mit Ausbildungsordnungen des Bundes für anerkannte Ausbildungsberufe (German), 2011. 26. SELUBA. Modellversuch "Steigerung der Effizienz neuer Lernkonzepte und Unterrichtsmethoden in der dualen Berufsausbildung": Abschlussbericht zum Modellversuch SELUBA, 2002. 27. P. Sloane. Lernfelder als curriculare Vorgabe (German), pages 187-203. Schneider Verlag, Hohengehren, 2001. 28. P. F. E. Sloane. Bildungsstandards in der beruflichen Bildung - Wirkungssteuerung beruflicher Bildung (German). Eusl, Paderborn, 2007. 29. Staatsinstitut für Schulqualität und Bildungsforschung. Lehrplanrichtlinie für die Berufsschule. Fachklassen: Fachinformatiker/Fachinformatikerin (German), 30. I. Starruß. Synopse zum Informatikunterricht in Deutschland (German). Master's thesis, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, 2010. 31. A. Vihavainen, M. Paksula, M. Luukkainen, and J. Kurhila. Extreme apprenticeship method: Key practices and upward scalability. In Proceedings of the 16th Annual Joint Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education, ITiCSE '11, pages 273-277, New York, NY, USA, 2011. ACM. 32. F. Weinert. Leistungsmessung in Schulen (German). Beltz, Weinheim and Basel, Switzerland, 2001. 14