International Staging System: A Tool to Predict Survival in Patients with Multiple Myeloma



Similar documents
UNDERSTANDING MULTIPLE MYELOMA AND LABORATORY VALUES Benjamin Parsons, DO Gundersen Health System Center for Cancer and

Things You Don t Want to Miss in Multiple Myeloma

Multiple Myeloma. The term multiple myeloma is considered to be synonymous with myeloma, plasma cell myeloma, active and symptomatic myeloma.

Multiple Myeloma Patient s Booklet

Shaji Kumar, M.D. Multiple Myeloma: Multiple myeloma (MM) is the second most common hematological

A Clinical Primer. for Managed Care Stakeholders

Monoclonal Gammopathy of Undetermined Significance (MGUS) Facts

SOUTHWEST ONCOLOGY GROUP CLINICAL RESEARCH ASSOCIATE (CRA) MANUAL. MYELOMA CHAPTER 10 REVISED: March 2008

MULTIPLE MYELOMA Review & Update for Primary Care. Dr. Joseph Mignone 21st Century Oncology

FastTest. You ve read the book now test yourself

Table 16a Multiple Myeloma Average Annual Number of Cancer Cases and Age-Adjusted Incidence Rates* for

A Diagnostic Chest XRay: Multiple Myeloma

Comparison of Serum Beta 2-Microglobulin and 24 hour Urinary Creatinine Clearance as a Prognostic Factor in Multiple Myeloma

Multiple Myeloma Workshop- Tandem 2014


Outline. Question 1. Question 2. What is Multiple Myeloma? Andrew Eisenberger, MD

chronic leukemia lymphoma myeloma differentiated 14 September 1999 Pre- Transformed Ig Surface Surface Secreted Myeloma Major malignant counterpart

TABLE OF CONTENTS. Multiple Myeloma / Plasma Cell Leukemia Pre-HSCT Data

I've Just Been Diagnosed. with Multiple Myeloma, What s Next?

Clinical Course of Patients With Relapsed Multiple Myeloma. Mayo Clin Proc. July 2004;79(7):

Waldenström Macroglobulinemia: The Burning Questions. IWMF Ed Forum May Morie Gertz MD, MACP

Continuing Medical Education Article Imaging of Multiple Myeloma and Related Plasma Cell Dyscrasias JNM, July 2012, Volume 53, Number 7

Stem Cell Transplantation

Multiple. Powerful thinking advances the cure

Whole Antibody and Free Light Chain Production by Plasma Cells

Multiple Myeloma. Abstract. Introduction

Myeloma pathways to diagnosis UCLP audit

Malignant Lymphomas and Plasma Cell Myeloma

Proteins. Protein Trivia. Optimizing electrophoresis

Multiple Myeloma Making Sense of the Report Forms. Parameswaran Hari Medical College of Wisconsin Milwaukee

Information Pathway. Myeloma tests and investigations. Paraprotein measurement

Multiple myeloma: challenges of management in a developing country

Background Information Myeloma

Current Multiple Myeloma Treatment Adapted From the NCCN Guidelines

Summary & Conclusion

The Role of Bisphosphonates in Multiple Myeloma: 2007 Update Clinical Practice Guideline

Multiple Myeloma. This reference summary will help you understand multiple myeloma and its treatment options.

NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE. Lenalidomide or Observation in Treating Patients With Asymptomatic High-Risk Smoldering Multiple Myeloma

Multiple Myeloma Understanding your diagnosis

Multiple Myeloma. Understanding your diagnosis

The Blood Cancer Twice As Likely To Affect African Americans: Multiple Myeloma

Multiple myeloma: A clinical and pathological profile

Aggressive lymphomas. Michael Crump Princess Margaret Hospital

NON SECRETORY MULTIPLE MYELOMA A CASE REPORT

MULTIPLE MYELOMA. Dr Malkit S Riyat. MBChB, FRCPath(UK) Consultant Haematologist

A Focus on Multiple Myeloma

Use of free light chain analysis in the diagnosis, prognosis and therapy of multiple myeloma. Amitabha Mazumder, MD

Table of Contents Accelerate Your Research Introduction I. From the Real World to the Lab II. Research Challenges III. How Can Conversant Bio Help?

Investigation of B cell malignancies. Dr. Joanna Sheldon Protein Reference Unit St. George s s Hospital

Asymptomatic or smoldering myeloma with no symptoms and slow growing cancer cells

New diagnostic criteria for myeloma

What you need to know about. Multiple Myeloma. Based on a brochure from National Institutes of Health National Cancer Institute STDAVIDS.

Multiple Myeloma. What is cancer?

Estimated New Cases of Leukemia, Lymphoma, Myeloma 2014

Understanding Protein Electrophoresis

Plasma cell dyscrasias Mark Drayson

Multiple Myeloma Patient Handbook.

.org. Metastatic Bone Disease. Description

Beta-2-Microglobulin Is an Independent Predictor of Progression in Asymptomatic Multiple Myeloma

Kharkov Regional Centre of Cardiovascular surgery V.N. Karazin Kharkov National University Department of Internal Medicine.

Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute s Multiple Myeloma Program

Multiple Myeloma How to Evaluate Response To Treatment and Relapse

MULTIPLE MYELOMA. Overview

Interesting Case Review. Renuka Agrawal, MD Dept. of Pathology City of Hope National Medical Center Duarte, CA

Lymphoplasmacytic Lymphoma. Hematology fellows conference 4/12/2013 Christina Fitzmaurice, MD, MPH

Serum protein electrophoresis is a laboratory

PATIENT HANDBOOK. Multiple Myeloma. Improving Lives Finding the Cure. Cancer of the Bone Marrow. Prepared by Brian G.M. Durie, M.D.

PROTOCOLS FOR TREATMENT OF MALIGNANT LYMPHOMA

Understanding Serum Free Light Chain Assays

Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia. Case Study. AAIM Triennial October 2012 Susan Sokoloski, M.D.

Multiple Myeloma. What is multiple myeloma? Low blood counts

Pulling the Plug on Cancer Cell Communication. Stephen M. Ansell, MD, PhD Mayo Clinic

Haematological Features and Serum Protein Pattern on Electrophoresis of Multiple Myeloma in Sudanese Patients

Multiple. Powerful thinking advances the cure

1.5 Function of analyte For albumin, see separate entry. The immunoglobulins are components of the humoral arm of the immune system.

ADVANCES IN MULTIPLE MYELOMA:

Myeloma. Ann Grace, myeloma survivor. This publication was supported in part by a grant from

Study of serum protein electrophoresis in suspected cases of Multiple Myeloma.

Tumour Markers. What are Tumour Markers? How Are Tumour Markers Used?

An overview of CLL care and treatment. Dr Dean Smith Haematology Consultant City Hospital Nottingham

Introduction. About 10,500 new cases of acute myelogenous leukemia are diagnosed each

Acute Pancreatitis. Questionnaire. if yes: amount (cigarettes/day): since when (year): Drug consumption: yes / no if yes: type of drug:. amount:.

Multiple Myeloma. National Cancer Institute. What You Need TM. To Know About

UMHS-PUHSC JOINT INSTITUTE

Myeloma. A guide for patients and families leukaemia.org.au

GUIDELINES FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF LUNG CANCER

REFERENCE CODE GDHCER PUBLICAT ION DATE JULY 2015 MULTIPLE MYELOMA EPIDEMIOLOGY FORECAST TO 2023

Transcription:

World Applied Sciences Journal 16 (7): 1004-1008, 2012 ISSN 1818-4952 IDOSI Publications, 2012 International Staging System: A Tool to Predict Survival in Patients with Multiple Myeloma 1 2 3 Aneela Atta Ur Rahman, Syed Zulfiquar Ali Shah, Bikha Ram Devrajani, 4 4 2 Sahreen Rajput, Zulfiqar Ali Qutrio Baloch and Thanvar Das 1 Faculty of Community Medicine and Public Health Sciences and Medical Research Center, Liaquat University of Medical and Health Sciences (LUMHS), Jamshoro 2 Medical Research Center, Liaquat University of Medical and Health Sciences (LUMHS), Jamshoro 3 Liaquat University of Medical and Health Sciences (LUMHS), Jamshoro 4 Department of Medicine Liaquat University Hospital, Hyderabad Abstract: This descriptive case series study was evaluates the International Staging System (ISS) for the prediction of survival in patients with multiple myeloma and was conducted in the department of Medicine at Liaquat University Hospital from June 2009 to June 2011. All patients above 12 years of age, of either gender with history of bone pain, usually in the back and ribs broken bones, usually in the spine, feeling weak and very tired, feeling very thirsty, frequent infections and fevers, weight loss, nausea, constipation and frequent urination were further evaluated for multiple myeloma. The widely accepted schema for the diagnosis of multiple myeloma uses particular combinations of laboratory, imaging and procedure findings, while the International Staging System for multiple myeloma was used for staging or prognosis purpose and the survival was measured from the onset of nonradiation therapy to time of death or last contact. During study period total 23 patients of multiple myeloma were evaluated for staging and prognosis by International Staging System. Of twenty three 16 (70%) were males and 07 (30) were females. The overall mean age was 62.78± 8.86 (SD) years while the mean age in male and female population was 56.82 ± 10.65 (SD) and 60.77 ±7.76 (SD) respectively. The mean haemoglobin, creatinine and calcium were 7.56±2.98 g/dl, 3.44±1.24 mg/dl and 13.72±3.88 mg/dl respectively. The male and female distribution in relation to International Staging System was 04(25.0%) and 01 (14.3%) in stage I, 04(25.0%) and 02(28.6%) in stage II while 08(50.0%) and 04 (57.1%) in stage III. The median survival in relation to International Staging System was 36.4 months in 05(22%) stage I patients, 20.6 months in 06(26%) stage II patients and 10.8 in 12(52%) stage III patients. the ISS has better reliability, simplicity and predictability for survival of patients with multiple myeloma. Key words: Multiple Myeloma Staging ISS Plasmacytoma INTRODUCTION of patients are younger than 40 years at diagnosis [5]. The plasma cell proliferation usually results in extensive Multiple myeloma also known as plasma cell myeloma skeletal destruction with osteolytic lesions, or Kahler's disease is a cancer of plasma cells, a type of hypercalcemia, anemia and, occasionally, plasma cell white blood cell normally responsible for the production infiltration in different organs. The excessive production of antibodies and accounts for approximately 10% of of a monoclonal (M) protein can lead to renal failure, hematologic malignancies [1, 2]. The annual incidence, hyperviscosity syndrome or recurrent bacterial infections. age-adjusted to the 2000 US population, is 4.3 cases per [6] 100,000 people, resulting in more than 15,000 new patients The combinations of prognostic factors were in the United States each year [3, 4]. Multiple myeloma is suggested for staging classification of myeloma patients twice as common in African Americans as in white [7]. In 1975, Durie and Salmon [8] introduced a staging persons and is slightly more common in men than in system, the Durie/Salmon (DS) system, using commonly women. The median age at onset is 66 years and only 2% available clinical parameters that predicted myeloma cell Corresponding Author: Dr. Bikha Ram Devrajani, Liaquat University of Medical and Health Sciences (LUMHS), Jamshoro, Pakistan. 1004

Table 1: Diagnostic considerations for multiple myeloma I Plasmacytoma on tissue biopsy II Bone marrow with greater than 30% plasma cells III Monoclonal globulin spike on serum protein electrophoresis, with an immunoglobulin (Ig) G peak of greater than 3.5 g/dl or an IgA peak of greater than 2 g/dl, or urine protein electrophoresis (in the presence of amyloidosis) result of greater than 1 g/24 h (a) Bone marrow with 10-30% plasma cells (b) Monoclonal globulin spike present but less than category III (c) Lytic bone lesions (d) Residual IgM level less than 50 mg/dl, IgA level less than 100 mg/dl, or IgG level less than 600 mg/dl The following combinations of findings are used to make the diagnosis of multiple myeloma: I plus b, c, or d II plus b, c, or d III plus a, c, or d a plus b plus c a plus b plus d Table 2: The international staging system for multiple myeloma STAGE I Serum beta-2 microglobulin is less than 3.5 (mg/l) and the albumin level is above 3.5 (g/dl) II Neither stage I or III, meaning that either: (a) The beta-2 microglobulin level is between 3.5 and 5.5 (with any albumin level), OR (b) The albumin is below 3.5 while the beta-2 microglobulin is less than 3.5 III Serum beta-2 microglobulin is greater than 5.5. tumor burden. Factors in the DS classification included from June 2009 to June 2011. All patients above 12 the level and type of monoclonal protein, hemoglobin, years of age, of either gender with history of bone pain, calcium level and number of bone lesions. Creatinine level usually in the back and ribs broken bones, usually in the (substage A: serum creatinine <2 mg/dl; and substage B: spine, feeling weak and very tired, feeling very thirsty, serum creatinine =2 mg/dl) further defined lower versus frequent infections and fevers, weight loss, nausea, higher risk patients in each of the three tumor mass constipation and frequent urination through outdoor stages. However, this staging system has limitations, patient department (OPD), casualty outdoor department especially in the categorization of bone lesions [9, 10]. (COD) or admitted in medical unit were evaluated and Recently, Greipp et al [11] have developed the new enrolled in the study. The detailed history of all such International Staging System (ISS), a collaborative effort patients was taken and complete physical and relevant by investigators from 17 institutions worldwide and data clinical examination was performed. All the routine and on 11,171 patients. The ISS overcomes the limitations of specific investigation including complete blood count (to the Durie- Salmon staging and divides patients into 3 determine if patient has anemia, leucopenia or distinct stages and prognostic groups solely on the basis thrombocytopenia), bone marrow aspiration for cytology of serum 2- microglobulin and albumin levels. The stage and cytogenetics, a comprehensive metabolic profile of the disease at presentation is a strong determinant of including urea/creatinine, uric acid, protein and survival, but it has little influence on the choice of therapy globulin levels, serum protein electrophoresis for since almost all patients, except for rare patients with M band, Beta 2 microglobulins and c-reactive solitary bone tumors or extramedullary plasmacytomas, proteins, Imaging studies including serial skeletal X- have generalized disease. By considering such literature Rays for osteopenia or lytic lesions. MRI (magnetic in mind the present study was conducted to evaluate the resonance Imaging) and PET (positron emmision prognosis of patients with multiple myeloma by tomography), serum protein electrophoresis is performed International Staging System at tertiary care teaching for level and type of M-protein, creatinine, lactate hospital Hyderabad / Jamshoro. dehydrogenase (LDH), serum albumin and 2M. The widely accepted schema for the diagnosis of multiple MATERIALS AND METHODS myeloma (MM) uses particular combinations of laboratory, imaging and procedure findings as diagnostic This descriptive case series study was conducted in criteria. (Table 1). The International Staging System for the department of Medicine at Liaquat University Hospital multiple myeloma was used for staging or prognosis 1005

purpose (Table 2) and the survival was measured from the onset of nonradiation therapy to time of death or last contact. The known / diagnosed cases of multiple myeloma were also included in the study. The informed consent was taken from every patient or from attendants of p a tients after full explanation of procedure regarding the study and all such maneuvers was performed under medical ethics and through the cooperation of whole research team. For recruitment of the subjects the non - probability purposive technique was used while the exclusion criteria of the study were; conditions associated with an increased rate of cell production or destruction, severe infections, viral infections such as CMV (cytomegalovirus) and some conditions that activate the immune system, such as inflammatory conditions and autoimmune disorders that increases the 2M levels, the drugs such as lithium, cyclosporine, cisplatin, carboplatin and aminoglycoside antibiotics can increase 2M blood and / or urine concentrations. Recent nuclear medicine procedures and radiographic contrast media can affect test results, malignant Lymphoma, metastatic carcinoma; monoclonal gammopathies of uncertain origin and waldenstrom hypergammaglobulinemia. The data was collected on pre-designed proforma and analyzed in SPSS version 10.00. The frequency and percentage was calculated for gender distribution. Mean ±SD was computed for quantitative variables like age and duration of illness. The stratification was done on age, gender and stage of disease. RESULTS World Appl. Sci. J., 16 (7): 1004-1008, 2012 Table 3: Gender distribution in relation to International Staging System Gender ------------------------------------- Stage Male Female Total I 04(25.0%) 01 (14.3%) 05(21.7%) II 04(25.0%) 02(28.6%) 06(26.1%) III 08(50.0%) 04 (57.1%) 12(52.2%) Total 16(100%) 07(100%) 23(100%) Table 4: Median Survival in Relation to International Staging System Stage n = 23 (%) Median survival (months) I 05(22%) 36.4 II 06(26%) 20.6 III 12(52%) 10.8 3.24±1.09 g/dl. The International Staging System in relation to gender distribution and median survival is shown in Table 3-4. DISCUSSION Determining the prognostic factors of multiple myeloma is important for predicting disease outcome and determining the treatment method. Up till yet, a number of prognostic factors have been identified including hemoglobin, calcium, creatinine, 2-microglobulin [12, 13], albumin [14], C-reactive protein [15], the plasma cell labeling index [16] and chromosomal 13 deletion or other chromosomal abnormalities. [17] Among these, 2- microglobulin has been the single most important prognostic factor for predicting survival and it is correlated with the tumor burden and renal function. The serum albumin may reflect the liver function and the nutritional status. In present study the mean age was 62.78± 8.86 whereas it was 60.83± 12.73 years in the study published in 2007. [18] The specific cause of decreased albumin in some multiple myeloma patients is not certain; however, a lower albumin may reflect effects on the liver by interleukin-6 produced by the microenvironment of myeloma cells. The strong correlations between serum levels of Sß2M and serum albumin and myeloma patient During study period total 23 patients of multiple myeloma were evaluated for staging and prognosis by International Staging System. Of twenty three 16 (70%) were males and 07 (30) were females. The overall mean age was 62.78±8.86 (SD) years while the mean age in male and female population was 56.82±10.65 (SD) and 60.77±7.76 survival (SD) respectively. The mean haemoglobin, creatinine and calcium were 7.56±2.98 g/dl, 3.44±1.24 mg/dl and 13.72±3.88 mg/dl respectively. The symptoms observed were bone pain 18(78%), weakness and very tired 20(86%), feeling very thirsty 15 (65%), frequent infections and fevers (20 (86%), weight loss 22 (96%), nausea 19 (83%), constipation 13 (56%) and frequent urination 11 (48%). The mean beta-2 microglobulin and albumin in overall patients was 5.99±1.70 mg/dl and 44 and 29 months in the study by Choi [18] imply connections to important underlying mechanisms. There are several clues in the published literature, [19, 20] but to date, the underlying biology remains to be explored. Because the levels of Sß2M and albumin are now specified by the ISS, it is critical that laboratory variation be minimized by standardizing methods used to determine their levels, specifically in multiple myeloma. In present study the median survival observed is 36.4, 20.6 and 10.8 months whereas it was 62, 1006

It was recently published that the ISS systems at the 5. Kyle, R.A., M.A. Gertz and T.E. Witzig, 2003. time of diagnosis can predict the prognosis of multiple myeloma patients who have undergone high dose chemotherapy with autologous peripheral stem cell transplantation as a first-line therapy [21]. Furthermore, it was also published that the overall survival could be predicted by the the ISS but not by the DS staging system. One study that evaluated the significance of five staging systems in 470 multiple myeloma patients showed the superiority of the ISS over the DS staging system and the other prognostic classifications based on a combination of 2-microglobulin and albumin. [22] It is unclear whether higher ISS stages reflect higher myeloma tumor burden / aggressiveness or the level of target organ damage or both. Patients with a high ISS stage are at higher risk of early death, but it is unclear whether this reflects an inability to receive and tolerate aggressive therapy or myeloma biology or both. A smaller study [21] found that the ISS was better correlated with post transplant outcomes than the DSS. Regarding clinical presentation and haematological manifestation the present study is consistent with the study published in 2005 and 2010 [23, 24] It is identified that the ISS staging system is broadly useful and that it will provide a sound base for more advanced studies in the future, it is also suggested that the ISS might be a more reliable and simple staging system for multiple myeloma patients. CONCLUSION Our study showed that the International Staging System has better reliability, simplicity and predictability for survival of patients with multiple myeloma. REFERENCES 1. Kyle, R.A. and S.V. Rajkumar, 2004. Plasma cell disorders. In: Goldman L, Ausiello D, eds. Cecil Textbook of Medicine. 22nd ed. Philadelphia, Pa: Saunders, pp: 1184-1195. 2. Kyle, R.A. and S.V. Rajkumar, 2005. Multiple myeloma [published correction appears in N Engl. J. Med., 352: 1163. 3. Kyle, R.A., T.M. Therneau, S.V. Rajkumar, D.R.Larson. M.F.Plevak and L.J. Melton, 2004. Incidence of multiple myeloma in Olmsted County, Minnesota: trend over 6 decades. Cancer, 101: 2667-2674. 4. Jemal, A., T. Murray and E. Ward, 2005. Cancer statistics, 2005. CA Cancer J. Clin, 55: 10-30. Review of 1027 patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Mayo Clinic. Proc., 78: 21-33. 6. Kyle, R.A., 1996. Multiple Myeloma: An overview in 1996. The Oncologist, 15: 315-23. 7. Dawson, A.A. and D. Ogston, 1971. Factors influencing the prognosis in myelomatosis. Postgrad Med. J., 47: 635-638 8. Durie, B.G.M. and S.E. Salmon, 1975. A clinical staging system for multiple myeloma. Cancer, 36: 842-854. 9. Kyle, R.A., 1995. Prognostic factors in multiple myeloma. Stem Cells, 13(suppl 2): 56-63. 10. Rapoport, B.L., H.C. Falkson and G. Falkson, 1991. Prognostic factors affecting the survival of patients with multiple myeloma: a retrospective analysis of 86 patients. S Afr. Med. J., 79: 65-67. 11. Greipp, P.R., J.S. Miguel and B.G. Durie, 2005. International staging system for multiple myeloma. J. Clin Oncol., 23: 3412-3420. 12. Bataille, R., B.G. Durie and J. Grenier, 1983. Serum beta2 microglobulin and survival duration in multiple myeloma: a simple reliable marker for staging. Br J. Haematol., 55: 439-447. 13. Durie, B.G., D. Stock-Novack, S.E. Salmon, P. Finley, J. Beckord and J. Crowley, 1990. Prognostic value of pretreatment serum beta 2 microglobulin in myeloma: a Southwest Oncology Group Study. Blood, 75: 823-830. 14. Bataille, R., B.G. Durie. J. Grenier and J. Sany, 1986. Prognostic factors and staging in multiple myeloma: a reappraisal. J. Clin Oncol., 4: 80-87. 15. Bataille, R., M. Boccadoro, B. Klein, B. Durie and A. Pileri, 1992. C-reactive protein and beta-2 microglobulin produce a simple and powerful myeloma staging system. Blood, 80: 733-737. [PubMed] 16. Greipp, P.R., J.A. Lust, W.M. O'Fallon, J.A. Katzmann, T.E. Witzig and R.A. Kyle, 1993. Plasma cell labeling index and beta 2-microglobulin predict survival independent of thymidine kinase and C-reactive protein in multiple myeloma. Blood, 81: 3382-3387. 17. Tricot, G., B. Barlogie, S. Jagannath, D. Bracy, S. Mattox and D.H. Vesole, 1995. Poor prognosis in multiple myeloma is associated only with partial or complete deletions of chromosome 13 or abnormalities involving 11q and not with other karyotype abnormalities. Blood, 86: 4250-4256. 1007

18. Choi. J.H., Y. Jae-Hoon and Y. Seong-Kyu, 2007. 22. Mihou, D., I. Katodritou and K. Zervas, 2006. Clinical Value of New Staging Systems for Multiple Evaluation of five staging systems in 470 patients Myeloma. Cancer Res. Treat, 39(4): 171-174. with multiple myeloma. Haematologica, 91: 1149-115. 19. Christianson, G.J., W. Brooks and S. Vekasi, 1997. 23. Greipp, P.R., J. San Miguel, B.G. Durie, J.J. Crowley, Beta2-microglobulin-deficient mice are protected B. Barlogie, J. Bladé. M. Boccadoro, J.A. Child, from hypergammaglobulinemia and have defective H. Avet-Loiseau. R.A. Kyle, J.J. Lahuerta, H. Ludwig, antibody responses because of increased IgG G. Morgan, R. Powles, K. Shimizu, C. Shustik, catabolism. J. Immunol., 159: 4781-4792 P. Sonneveld, P. Tosi, I. Turesson and J. Westin, 20. Bologa, R.M., D.M. Levine and T.S. Parker, 1998. 2005. International staging system for multiple Interleukin-6 predicts hypoalbuminemia, myeloma. J. Clin Oncol., 23(15): 3412-20. hypocholesterolemia and mortality in hemodialysis 24. Inamullah, R. Fazle, T. Muhammad, W. Rubina and patients. Am J. Kidney Dis., 32: 107-114 R. Ahmad, 2010. Hematological presentation of 21. Kim, H., H.J. Sohn, S. Kim, K. Kim, J.H. Lee and multiple Myeloma in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa. Gomal J. S.M. Bang, 2006. New staging systems can predict Medical Sci., 8(2)2: 130-3. prognosis of multiple myeloma patients undergoing autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation as first-line therapy. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant, 12: 837-844. 1008