WASHINGTON COLLEGE OF LAW, AMERICAN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL LIABILITY & PUBLIC HEALTH PROFESSOR STEVEN M. PAVSNER SYLLABUS



Similar documents
Personal Injury Litigation

Colorado s Civil Access Pilot Project and the Changing Landscape of Business Litigation

MEDIATION AND ARBITRATION OF MEDICAL MALPRACTICE DISPUTES: TIME FOR A POSITIVE CHANGE

Medical Malpractice: What You Don t Know Can Hurt You

Kenneth B. Walton Partner, Chair, Employment Practices Group Member, Executive Committee direct fax

Kenneth B. Walton Senior Partner, Chair, Employment Practices Group direct fax

CARL E. FORSBERG PRACTICE EMPHASIS AND EXPERIENCE EDUCATION BAR / COURT ADMISSIONS HONORS / AWARDS / UNIQUE RECOGNITION.

Medical malpractice. Deborah B. Garibay, RN, JD, CPHRM Deputy General Counsel Medical Faculty Associates, Inc.

Defense of State Employees: LIABILITY AND LAWSUITS. UNCW Office of General Counsel January 2010

The Malpractice Lawsuit:

New Summer Course. Drug Product Liability Litigation: Principles and Practice

Mary H. Spillane Member. Mary H. Spillane

FILING A PERSONAL INJURY OR PROPERY DAMAGE LAWSUIT

J. MICHAEL HAYES, N.B.T.A. TRIAL ATTORNEY BOARD CERTIFIED CIVIL TRIAL SPECIALIST* 69 DELAWARE AVENUE SUITE 1111 BUFFALO, NEW YORK

Personal Injury Law: Minnesota Medical Malpractice

trial court and Court of Appeals found that the Plaintiff's case was barred by the statute of limitations.

HONORABLE JOSEPH P. SPINOLA New York

J. MICHAEL HAYES, N.B.T.A. TRIAL ATTORNEY BOARD CERTIFIED CIVIL TRIAL SPECIALIST* 69 DELAWARE AVENUE SUITE 1111 BUFFALO, NEW YORK

Discovery Expert Reports

Georgia Board for Physician Workforce

FARAH & FARAH RULES OF LAW

If you have been sued as a defendant in a civil case...keep reading.

THE IMPACT OF HIPAA ON PERSONAL INJURY PRACTICE

Locating Practice Materials

Making Sure The Left Hand Knows What The Right Hand Is Doing Representing Health Care Providers In Medical Negligence Cases by: Troy J. Crotts, Esq.

Medical Malpractice: Keys to Pretrial Success National Business Institute April 2011

ATTORNEY HELP CENTER: MEDICAL MALPRACTICE

Update on SB3, The Georgia Tort Reform Law (Updated 3/22/2010)

Working with the Physician s Counsel in Defending Off-Label Use Litigation

MOCK MEET AND CONFER AND RULE 16(B) CONFERENCE: WHO IS AT THE TABLE AND WHAT HAPPENS WHEN COUNSEL CAN T AGREE? ASK THE JUDGE!

Professional Practice 544

BRIAN F. SPECTOR, LLC

Attorneys at Law. Telephone: (312) Facsimile: (312) N LaSalle Street Suite 1524 Chicago, IL

Elena B. Langan EXPERIENCE:

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL TRIAL DIVISION

PROPOSED ORDER GRANTING FINAL APPROVAL OF MANDATORY CLASS SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

How To Pass A Bill In The United States

It s important to understand the process and react properly when it occurs.

Amy S. Harris Shareholder

How To Get A Job At A Law Firm In California

How To Get A Medical Insurance Policy For A Surgical Mesh

Chapter 4 Crimes (Review)

The Foundation of the International Association of Defense Counsel SURVEY OF INTERNATIONAL LITIGATION PROCEDURES: A REFERENCE GUIDE

CHAPTER Committee Substitute for Committee Substitute for Committee Substitute for Committee Substitute for House Bill No.

PRACTICAL ADVICE ON THE MOST EFFECTIVE WAY TO SETTLE YOUR CASE WITH THE GOVERNMENT

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC COMMENTS OF DAN CYTRYN, ESQUIRE OF LAW OFFICES CYTRYN & SANTANA, P.A.

PELLISSIPPI STATE COMMUNITY COLLEGE MASTER SYLLABUS TORTS LAW College-level competencies in logic, reading, and English are required.

VIRGINIA ACTS OF ASSEMBLY SESSION

Lowcountry Injury Law

Executive summary and overview of the national report for Denmark

Business Court 2012 Annual Report

CURRICULUM VITAE. PHILLIPS LAW OFFICES 161 North Clark Street, Suite 4925 Chicago, IL (312)

William S. Mills. Curriculum Vitae EMPLOYMENT

STANDARDS FOR CERTIFICATION OF LAWYERS SPECIALIZING IN PERSONAL INJURY & WRONGFUL DEATH Revised January 1, 2013

The End of Malpractice Litigation? Improving Care and Communications to Reduce Risk

Physicians on Medical Malpractice Reform Options

Anatomy of a Medical Malpractice Case

CALIFORNIA TORT FORMS FROM EXPERT LITIGATORS (1st Edition) July 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION. Case No. 00-CV-73764

The trademark lawyer as brand manager

Limiting Product Liability

MERCER COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE COURSE OUTLINE

Medical Malpractice Reform: Fair and Just Compensation for All

A Practical Summary of the New Supreme Court Civil Rules for Clark Wilson LLP Insurance Clients

My Attorney. What A Personal Injury Lawyer Can Do For You. By Christopher M. Davis, Attorney at Law

HOUSE BILL NO. HB0106. Medical malpractice-use of expert witnesses. A BILL. for. AN ACT relating to medical malpractice actions; providing

What to expect when you are injured in a New York accident!

MEDIATION EXPERIENCE:

No. 64,976. [November 1, 1984] The Supreme Court Committee on Standard Jury Instructions

LETTERS OF PROTECTION IN GENERAL LIABIILTY CASES STRATEGIES FOR DEFENSE COUNSEL

About the Author Federal Jurisdiction Reform

Public Policy Position

Injury Case Roadmap. The Legal Process For Personal Injury Cases. By Christopher M. Davis, Attorney at Law

R. Scott Krause, Esq. Eccleston & Wolf, P.C. Hanover, Maryland

HOWARD COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT LIBRARY WESTLAW CONTENT ALL CASES & STATUTES MARYLAND GOLD WITH REGULATIONS PLUS

TORT AND INSURANCE LAW REPORTER. Informal Discovery Interviews Between Defense Attorneys and Plaintiff's Treating Physicians

Lesson 1. Health Information and Litigation ASSIGNMENT 1. Objectives. Criminal versus Civil Law

Senate Bill No. 292 Senator Roberson

CURRICULUM VITAE ROBERT J. NAPLETON

The Effect of Product Safety Regulatory Compliance

SUBMISSION OF THE MEDICO-LEGAL SOCIETY OF TORONTO TO THE HONOURABLE COULTER OSBORNE, QC CIVIL JUSTICE REFORM

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT GRECO V. SELECTION MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS, INC. San Diego Superior Court Case No CU-BT-CTL

POST LITIGATION BAD FAITH THE POTENTIALLY ERODING DEFENSE OF THE INSURER. Bradley J. Vance, Esquire 1

S. JEFFREY MINKER, P.C.

****************************************************** The officially released date that appears near the beginning of each opinion is the date the

William J. Leedom Shareholder Phone:

Notice of Collective Action and Opportunity to Join

RULE FEES AND COSTS FOR LEGAL SERVICES

Medical Malpractice Litigation in Arizona

SPECIAL CIVIL A GUIDE TO THE COURT

AN ACT. To amend chapter 383, RSMo, by adding thereto thirteen new sections relating to the Missouri health care arbitration act.

Medical Litigation in 2012

Case 3:14-cv AC Document 10 Filed 03/26/14 Page 1 of 14 Page ID#: 43

Department of Legislative Services Maryland General Assembly 2004 Session

RESUMÉ BOYD S. LEMON. Nature of Practice

Pharmacist Liability. Objectives: Tort law

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA WEST PALM BEACH DIVISION COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT I.

Blowing the Whistle on Accounting Fraud: The Sarbanes-Oxley Whistleblower Protections Act At A Glance

PROGRAM SCHEDULE FACULTY BIOS... 19

ASSEMBLY BILL No. 597

Transcription:

I. Synopsis WASHINGTON COLLEGE OF LAW, AMERICAN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL LIABILITY & PUBLIC HEALTH PROFESSOR STEVEN M. PAVSNER SYLLABUS The objective of the seminar, Medical Liability and Public Health, is to provide an indepth look at this specialized topic within the field of tort law. The course will offer an overview of the traditional medical liability system; explore the state of the law of medical liability; provide practical insights into how to bring, pursue, defend and resolve a medical liability claim; and discuss alternative approaches to the traditional medical liability system, including those in place and those under discussion at the time of the seminar. The course will be presented in lecture format, and will be enriched with frequent guests experienced in the field, including judges, mediators, plaintiff and defense lawyers, and experts who have testified in medical liability cases. There will be substantial opportunity for class participation. Readings will be assigned from current case reports, applicable statutes, medical literature and other materials collected in a two-volume set compiled by the Professor, and as updated with cases decided during the course. This is a two (2) credit course, for which Civil Procedure and Torts are prerequisites. The seminar will benefit students wishing to work in the medico-legal field, as well as students interested in tort litigation in general. II. Evaluation The seminar will be evaluated on the basis of class participation and a take-home exam. Students taking the exam will be given a complex fact pattern and related documents, including appropriately redacted medical records, hospital policies and guidelines, applicable statutes, pleadings, and other documents, and will be tested on their ability to identify the proper parties, set forth the claims and defenses that may be asserted, and discuss the damages the plaintiff(s) may be entitled to recover. Alternatively, students may elect to write a paper of writingrequirement quality on a topic selected in consultation with the Professor. III. Profile of the Professor Professor Pavsner is a 1972 cum laude graduate of the Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs at Princeton University, and a 1975 graduate of the Georgetown University Law Center. He is a member of the United States Supreme Court, District of Columbia, Maryland, Florida and Pennsylvania Bars, as well as the Bars of various federal courts. Mr. Pavsner is an active practitioner and a shareholder in the Litigation Group of Joseph, Greenwald & Laake, P.A., a 35-lawyer Firm in suburban Maryland. He has extensive experience in professional negligence, product liability and general personal injury litigation, as well as in class action, multi-district, and other complex civil litigation. He is rated AV

Preeminent 5.0 out of 5 by Martindale-Hubbell, and has been recognized as a Super Lawyer in Washington and Maryland each year since the ratings began. He has lectured on various trial practice and substantive tort and evidence topics to lawyers and law students, and is currently a member of the Adjunct Faculty of the Washington College of Law. IV. Description of the Seminar Week 1: Overview of the Current Medical Liability System This class will present an overview of the course, discuss the applicability of traditional tort concepts to the specialized area of medical negligence litigation, and introduce some of the special issues relevant to medical malpractice claims. Advance Reading for the Class: Chapter 1 in Class Materials. Week 2: The Health Care Provider Relationship Discussion of the nature of the relationship, how it is established and how and when it ends, including, with respect to establishment of the relationship, special issues related to liability of good Samaritans and liability to third parties. With respect to how and when the relationship ends, issues related to follow-up, referral and abandonment will be explored. Advance Reading for the Class: Chapter 2 in Class Materials. Week 3: Understanding Medical Records Discussion of the various parts of office and hospital charts; how to read and understand charts; what to look for as evidence of good practice or malpractice; rules, regulations and practices applicable to creating and maintaining medical records; proper and improper changes to medical records; and the potential consequences of changing medical records in response to a bad outcome. Privacy and HIPAA issues also will be explored. Advance Reading for the Class: Chapter 3 in Class Materials. Week 4: Informed Consent Informed consent is a critical stage of medical treatment; the failure to obtain informed consent can lead to liability for negligence, or for the intentional tort of battery, or in extreme cases to charges of human experimentation. This class will explore the concept of informed consent, including what must be disclosed to the patient, what happens if the

patient refuses consent, and to what extent obtaining a patient s informed consent protects a health care provider from a claim of medical liability. Advance Reading for the Class: Chapter 4 in Class Materials Week 5: Negligence of the Health Care Provider In the context of medical liability, negligence is a violation of the applicable standard of care. This class will discuss the standard of care for health care providers, and the source materials from which the standard may be derived (e.g., practice bulletins and guidelines, medical texts and literature, and the like). Differences between national standards and various forms of the locality rule will be discussed, as well as differences among a violation of the standard of care, a bad result, a judgment call and a school of thought. Non-medical acts that may give rise to liability (e.g., promises, guarantees, and the like) also will be discussed. Advance Reading for the Class: Chapter 5 in Class Materials. Week 6: Negligence of Health Care Institutions It is well established that a hospital, nursing home or other health care institution is responsible for the negligence of its employees, according to the doctrine of respondeat superior. This class will discuss special issues of institutional liability, including hospital liability for independent contractors who are their apparent agents, liability of health maintenance organizations that make utilization decisions that may adversely affect patient care, and nursing homes that must comply with the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1987 ( OBRA 87 ). Advance Reading for the Class: Chapter 6 in Class Materials Week 7: Causation In medical negligence as in other torts, negligence is not actionable unless it causes harm to the patient. The usual standard for determining causation is whether it is more likely than not that the negligence caused the harm. However, medical negligence cases can present special issues, such as the value of a chance, and how to predict and quantify the likelihood of future harm. This class will explore those issues. Advance Reading for the Class: Chapter 7 in Class Materials. Week 8: The Role of Experts

With few exceptions, as in the rare circumstance when res ipsa loquitor may apply, medical negligence must be established through the expert testimony of other health care providers. The expert is entitled to express opinions by virtue of his or her education, training and experience, but the opinions themselves must be based on the evidence in the case and on generally accepted science, found in documents, learned treatises, published standards and expert testimony. This class will explore the role of experts in medical negligence litigation, sources of their opinions, and limitations on the opinions they may express (arising, e.g., from Daubert). It also will discuss how a lay jury may be expected to deal with the battle of the experts. From the defense side, the class will explore the emerging strategy of characterizing expert testimony as the practice of medicine, and threatening plaintiffs experts with professional sanctions. Advance Reading for the Class: Chapter 8 in Class Materials Week 9: Damages In medical negligence as in other torts, the defendant is responsible for the harm that his or her negligence proximately caused. This class will discuss how to quantify damages and explore both economic and non-economic damages arising from medical negligence, what they include and how they are calculated, with particular emphasis on how juries assess non-economic damages, and how life care planners, economists and other experts may be utilized to calculate damages. Advance Reading for the Class: Chapter 9 in Class Materials Week 10: Discovery and Pre-Trial in Medical Liability Claims Like other complex civil litigation, medical liability cases can be won or lost in discovery. This class will discuss the nuts and bolts of pursuing a medical liability claim, including pre-filing investigation, preparing the complaint, pre-trial discovery, locating and using consultants and designated experts, deposing experts, pre-trial statements and conferences, and preparing for trial Advance Reading for the Class: Chapter 10 in Class Materials. Week 11: Defending the Medical Liability Case Medical negligence cases can be defended on procedural and substantive grounds. This class will explore the principal procedural mechanisms (such as venue and statute of limitations), as well as substantive defenses beyond mere denial of liability (such as the learned intermediary, assumption of the risk, contributory negligence, and the like. Advance Reading for the Class: Chapter 11 in Class Materials

Week 12: Resolution of Medical Liability Claims This class will discuss how to value a medical negligence case for settlement; courtordered mediation and the increasingly common practice of private mediation as a substitute or supplement to court-ordered mediation; and the advantages of settlement for financial planning purposes, such as resolving subrogation claims, structuring settlement payments and establishing special needs trusts in appropriate circumstances. The class will also discuss the effect of common clauses in malpractice policies that require the insured s consent to settle, and of the reporting requirement to the National Practitioner Data Bank. Advance Reading for the Class: Chapter 12 in Class Materials Week 13: Current Trends & Alternative Systems In response to concerns about frivolous lawsuits, jackpot justice, skyrocketing malpractice premiums, doctors allegedly leaving or moving their practices, and other concerns, real and chimerical, numerous states and the federal government have considered or instituted changes to the traditional tort system as applied to medical negligence claims. These changes have taken many forms, such as establishing a preliminary review board to screen or decide malpractice claims, capping damages, changing the collateral source rule and capping attorneys fees. This class will discuss the benefits and detriments associated with these various changes, consider whether or to what extent they have solved the perceived problem, and explore other options. Week 14: Review Advance Reading for the Class: Chapter 13 in Class Materials This class will be devoted to preparing for the final exam, discussing papers being written in lieu of the final exam, and answering any questions that may be lingering from the class presentations or arising from the class requirements. Advance Reading for the Class: None