Written Testimony to Texas House of Representatives Committee on Judiciary and Civil Jurisprudence - Subcommittee on Asbestos



Similar documents
PROLOGUE. THE ASCENDANCY AND CONCENTRATION OF MDLs CONSIDERED

Snapshot of Recent Trends in Asbestos Litigation 2011 Update

IN RE: SKECHERS TONING SHOE : CASE: 3:11-md TBR PRODUCT LIABILITY LITIGATION : : MDL No.: 2308

Recent Developments in Asbestos Litigation

Asbestos Payments Continued to Pull Back in 2013

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA VERSUS NO: ORDER AND REASONS

LOCAL RULES OF THE HARRIS COUNTY CIVIL COURTS AT LAW

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA SOUTH BEND DIVISION MEMORANDUM CONCERNING APPOINTMENT OF SPECIAL MASTER AND SCHEDULING

Business Court 2012 Annual Report

FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY TRIAL DIVISION. General Court Regulation No.

How To Get A Medical Insurance Policy For A Surgical Mesh

CIVIL TRIAL RULES. of the COURTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, TEXAS. Table of Contents GENERAL MATTERS. Rule 1.10 Time Standards for the Disposition of Cases...

CIVIL Statistical Reporting Guide

STATE OF MINNESOTA IN SUPREME COURT A Court of Appeals Meyer, J. Took no part, Page and Gildea, JJ.

Appendix I: Select Federal Legislative. Proposals Addressing Compensation for Asbestos-Related Harms or Death

Multidistrict Litigation In Patent Infringement Cases

Case: 1:12-cv Document #: 137 Filed: 07/29/14 Page 1 of 11 PageID #:1365

Mastering the Mass Tort Docket:

NOTICE TO THE ASBESTOS BAR

7.010 PLEAS, NEGOTIATIONS, DISCOVERY AND TRIAL DATES IN CRIMINAL CASES

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT THIRD JUDICIAL CIRCUIT MADISON COUNTY, ILLINOIS PART FIVE - LAW DIVISION AMENDED COURT RULES

UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL on MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION

Spill Control. Annual Meeting

SUMMARY OF S.B. 15 ASBESTOS/SILICA LITIGATION REFORM BILL

FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY TRIAL DIVISION. General Court Regulation No.

Snapshot of Recent Trends in Asbestos Litigation

WikiLeaks Document Release

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA COLUMBUS DIVISION O R D E R

ASBESTOS CLAIMS AND LITIGATION UPDATE AND REVIEW: 2008 NEW CASE FILING SUMMARY AND ANALYSIS

239th DISTRICT COURT GENERAL GUIDELINES

LOCAL RULES of THE CIVIL COURTS OF DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS -- including revisions approved by the Texas Supreme Court 12/7/05

Case MDL No Document 1-1 Filed 09/15/14 Page 1 of 8 BEFORE THE JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTI-DISTRICT LITIGATION

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

HOUSE BILL No Washburne

MISSISSIPPI LEGISLATURE REGULAR SESSION 2013

Asbestos Payments Pulled Back Slightly in 2012, although Average Payments per Resolved Claim Remained High

FEDERAL PREEMPTION AND STATE IMPOSED MEDICAL CRITERIA IN ASBESTOS AND SILICA PERSONAL INJURY CASES: ARE THE ODDS AGAINST YOU?

Case MDL No Document 167 Filed 08/08/14 Page 1 of 5. UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL on MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION TRANSFER ORDER

GOVERNMENT PROSECUTIONS AND QUI TAM ACTIONS

Case 1:14-md JMF Document 70 Filed 07/18/14 Page 1 of 6

IN RE SILICA PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

BANKRUPTCY PARALEGAL: TRUSTEE'S COUNSEL

Local Rules of the District Courts of Montgomery County, Texas

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS

Commonwealth of Kentucky Court of Appeals

Indiana County Criminal. Age of Pending Cases as of 12/31/2011. Criminal New Cases Filed, Indiana

2014 IL App (1st) U. No IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT

In Re: Asbestos Products Liability

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO CA COA

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS

Journal SPECIAL REPORT. A Texas success story: Asbestos and silica lawsuit reform Ending abusive litigation and restoring fairness. Civil.

SUPPLEMENTAL NOTE ON SENATE BILL NO. 592

trial court and Court of Appeals found that the Plaintiff's case was barred by the statute of limitations.

Judicial Council Monthly Court Activity Report Municipal Courts

CASE NO. 1D John H. Adams, P. Michael Patterson, and Cecily M. Welsh of Emmanuel, Sheppard, and Condon, Pensacola, for Appellant.

Matter of New York City Asbestos Litig NY Slip Op 30709(U) April 29, 2015 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /2013 Judge:

Appellate Docket No.: Appellate Case Style:

Claims & Litigation Overview

2012 Study of Employment Discrimination Litigation in the Northern and Western Districts of New York

What Are The Odds? Appeals in the Panther City Court and Big D!

8:09-mn JFA Date Filed 06/28/12 Entry Number 228 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA ANDERSON DIVISION

Interim Report to the 83rd Texas Legislature

Case 3:13-cv K Document 5 Filed 12/13/13 Page 1 of 32 PageID 52

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE SPECIAL WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALS PANEL AT KNOXVILLE May 29, 2012 Session

Case 2:09-cv AJM-KWR Document 19 Filed 02/10/10 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

Amy S. Harris Shareholder

Criminal Justice System Commonly Used Terms & Definitions

LITTLE TRAVERSE BAY BANDS OF ODAWA INDIANS

CLAIM FORM & DECLARATION FOR THE J T THORPE COMPANY SUCCESSOR TRUST

Counsel must be fully familiar with the Uniform Civil Rules for the Supreme Court 22 NYCRR Part 202.

LR Case management pilot program for criminal cases. A. Scope; application. This is a special pilot rule governing time limits for criminal

CASE MANAGEMENT REFORM: THE PHILIPPINE EXPERIENCE

US Asbestos Liability

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS INSTRUCTIONS FOR FILING COMPLAINT BY PRISONERS UNDER THE CIVIL RIGHTS ACT, 42 U.S.C.

Case 1:13-cv SEB-DKL Document 48 Filed 07/21/14 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: <pageid>

TEXAS CIVIL JUSTICE LEAGUE 400 West Fifteenth Street, Suite 1400 Austin, Texas (T)

GUIDELINES AND PROCEDURES ORANGE COUNTY RESIDENTIAL FORECLOSURE CASES Effective January 6, 2014

PART 3 CIVIL DISTRICT COURT RULES (Revised) APROVED BY THE TEXAS SUPREME COURT IN MAY 2002

Court of Appeals. First District of Texas

Case 2:12-md Document 701 Filed 02/19/14 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 7125

ASSEMBLY BILL No. 597

RULE 7 PROBATE CASES. RULE 7.10 Probate Courts/Session

ORDER GRANTING TRAVELERS INSURANCE COMPANY / HARTFORD UNDERWRITERS INSURANCE S MOTION TO INTERVENE

Personal injury claim" does not include a claim for compensatory benefits pursuant to worker s compensation or veterans benefits.

No Appeal. (PC ) O R D E R. The plaintiff, George Giusti, appeals from an order disqualifying the plaintiff s proposed

First Impressions: Shutting Down a Chapter 11 Case Due to Patent Unconfirmability of Plan. September/October Scott J.

8:11-mn JMC Date Filed 04/22/15 Entry Number 150 Page 1 of 8

HOUSE BILL No July 18, 2013, Introduced by Rep. Heise and referred to the Committee on Judiciary.

Asbestos Cases In the Courts: No Logjam

The Enforceability of Mediated Settlement Agreements. By: Thomas J. Smith The Law Offices of Thomas J. Smith San Antonio, Texas

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH

Judge: FJD Mass Torts Programs in Step With ABA Standards

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. The memorandum disposition filed on May 19, 2016, is hereby amended.

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION

RULE 1. ASSIGNMENT OF CASES

Case4:12-cv KAW Document2-1 Filed06/25/12 Page1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, OAKLAND DIVISION

Andrew C. Snyder, Esq East Prentice Avenue, #1500 Case No. 2013CV31667 Denver, Colorado Ctrm.: 269 Phone Number:

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA TRIAL DIVISION CIVIL SECTION

Transcription:

Written Testimony to Texas House of Representatives Committee on Judiciary and Civil Jurisprudence - Subcommittee on Asbestos Interim Charge 4: Study the degree of transparency in asbestos bankruptcy trusts and how it affects litigation of asbestos exposure claims in Texas courts. Interim Charge 6: Study whether the asbestos and silica multidistrict litigation courts should be allowed to dismiss, without prejudice, claims on the court s inactive dockets for want of prosecution under certain circumstances. Submitted by David Slayton, Administrative Director, Office of Court Administration

The House Judiciary and Civil Jurisprudence Committee s Subcommittee on Asbestos requested the Office of Court Administration (OCA) collect the following data regarding multidistrict litigation (MDL) cases involving asbestos-related injuries: the number of cases filed and disposed by year, the number of cases pending by year and the age of the cases at time of disposition. The subcommittee also requested information regarding the disposition status of asbestos cases that were referred back to their county of origin from 2008 to 2011. MDL asbestos cases are those cases that have been referred to a pre-trial judge by the MDL panel under Rule 13 of the Texas Rules of Judicial Administration for consolidated or coordinated pretrial proceedings. Judge Mark Davidson of Harris County was appointed by the MDL panel to serve as the pretrial judge in asbestosrelated injury cases. OCA does not maintain or collect case data specific to MDL cases, but because all MDL asbestos cases are referred to Judge Davidson in Harris County, OCA was able to obtain the requested data from Harris County. Summary of Cases Filed/Pending The following chart provides information regarding the asbestos cases referred to the MDL asbestos court from 2004 through 2011. Year New Filings Number of Plaintiffs on New Filings Designated MDL within Harris Co. 1 Disposed Transferred back to the County of Origin 2 Transferred back to Harris County Court of Origin 2004 995 8413 247 70 64 6 2005 2619 16331 307 80 35 6 2006 1239 17222 397 97 44 4 2007 430 7259 141 89 29 3 2008 268 1026 112 87 10 7 2009 200 1102 128 75 11 4 2010 229 394 130 86 7 0 2011 221 368 205 64 4 2 1 These are cases that were originally filed as regular asbestos cases but later filed a notice to designate as an MDL case. 2 This is a subset of the total disposed number. 2

10000 8000 6000 4000 2000 0 Pending Asbestos MDL Cases 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Observations: New filings peaked in 2005 and have declined steadily over the years. The number of cases disposed per year ranges from 64 to 97. The number of disposed cases that were referred back to the county of origin for final disposition varies by year. Note that the number of cases pending appears to increase by more than the number of new cases filed each year. This is because the MDL court sometimes severs the cases, which consist of multiple plaintiffs, into several distinct cases. When a case is severed, the filed date of the severed case is the date that the original case was filed, not the date that the case was severed. This process happens regularly and makes it impossible to calculate an accurate case disposition rate. Age of Disposed Cases The following chart provides information regarding the age of disposed asbestos cases by year. 120 100 80 60 40 20 over 36 months 18-36 months 12-18 months 6-12 months 3-6 months 0-3 months 0 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 3

Observations: Since 2004, 64 to 89 cases have been disposed of annually and the eight-year average is 81. In 2004, 98% of disposed cases were less than 12 months old. In 2011, 37% of disposed cases were less than 12 months old. In the last four years, an average of 370 new asbestos cases (new filings and cases designated as MDL within Harris County) have been added to the docket. At the average disposition rate of 81 cases per year, the docket will have approximately 280 additional cases added to its backlog annually. Age of Pending Cases The following chart provides the age of pending asbestos cases by year. 10000 9000 8000 7000 6000 5000 4000 3000 2000 over 36 months 18-36 months 12-18 months 6-12 months 3-6 months 0-3 months 1000 0 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Observations: In 2007, the number of cases over 36 months jumped from 262 to 2994. Though some of these cases are the result of new cases that were filed and had not been disposed of, because of the issue regarding the dating of severed cases, it cannot be determined with accuracy, how many of the cases that comprise this number are cases that were severed from another case. The number of cases over 36 months old has increased from 4% in 2004 to 92.5% in 2011. 4

Outcome of Cases Referred Back to County of Origin The Asbestos Subcommittee also asked OCA to research Disposition after remand the outcome of 30 cases that were remanded Judgment 11 (transferred) back to the county of origin, excluding Settled 2 Harris County, from 2008 through 2011. The pretrial Non-suit 4 court may order remand of a case or separable trial Dismissed 6 portions of a case when pretrial proceedings have been Pending 7 completed to such a degree that the purpose for the Remands 30 case to be transferred to the pretrial court has been fulfilled or no longer applies. Of the 30 cases that were remanded back to the county of origin, only seven appear to still be pending. The other cases either resulted in a judgment, were settled, dismissed or non-suited. 5

Summary Statistics of MDL Asbestos Cases 2004 through 2011 Number of Designated MDL Transferred back to Transferred back Year New Filings Plaintiffs on New Filings within Harris Co.* Disposed the County of Orgin** to Harris County Court of Orgin Pending 2004 995 8413 247 70 64 6 2879 2005 2619 16331 307 80 35 6 6404 2006 1239 17222 397 97 44 4 7598 2007 430 7259 141 89 29 3 8069 2008 268 1026 112 87 10 7 8412 2009 200 1102 128 75 11 4 8759 2010 229 394 130 86 7 0 8860 2011 221 368 205 64 4 2 9095 * These are cases that were originally filed as regular Asbestos cases but lated filed a notice to designate as an MDL. ** This is a subset of the Disposed number. Age of Pending MDL Asbestos cases Year 0-3 months 3-6 months 6-12 months 12-18 month18-36 months over 36 months Pending 2004 465 1318 836 20 125 115 2879 2005 873 1018 1615 1773 941 184 6404 2006 98 160 859 1902 4317 262 7598 2007 93 110 257 267 4348 2994 8069 2008 88 60 194 198 1289 6583 8412 2009 55 72 151 156 675 7650 8759 2010 37 43 119 132 494 8035 8860 2011 36 49 113 93 391 8413 9095 Age of Disposed MDL Asbestos Cases Year 0-3 months 3-6 months 6-12 months 12-18 month18-36 months over 36 months Disposed 2004 38 21 10 1 0 0 70 2005 18 15 32 12 3 0 80 2006 21 16 20 15 22 3 97 2007 5 8 22 17 24 13 89 2008 4 6 11 11 28 27 87 2009 7 9 8 6 18 27 75 2010 6 4 9 7 10 50 86 2011 6 5 13 5 5 30 64