U.S. SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL WASHINGTON, D.C. 20416



Similar documents
AUDIT OF SBA S SYSTEM AUDIT REPORT NUMBER 4-42 SEPTEMBER 10, 2004

ADVISORY MEMORANDUM REPORT ON DEVELOPMENT OF THE LOAN MONITORING SYSTEM ADVISORY REPORT NUMBER A1-03 FEBRUARY 23, 2001

Surety bonds are almost always written by insurance companies that are licensed by state insurance departments, but they are not like typical

AUDIT OF SBA S COMPLIANCE WITH JOINT FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PROPERTY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS AUDIT REPORT NUMBER 3-34

ASSESSMENT REPORT GPO WORKERS COMPENSATION PROGRAM. September 30, 2009

SBA SOP The Surety Bond Guarantee Program. Office of Surety Guarantees. U.S. Small Business Administration

What You Should Know About General Agreements of Indemnity and Why You Should Know It

INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS COLLEGE'S ADMINISTRATION OF TITLE IV STUDENT FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAMS

TREASURY INSPECTOR GENERAL FOR TAX ADMINISTRATION

2IÀFHRI,QVSHFWRU*HQHUDO

TREASURY INSPECTOR GENERAL FOR TAX ADMINISTRATION

perform cost settlements to ensure that future final payments for school-based services are based on actual costs.

U.S. Small Business Administration Surety Bond Guarantee Program. Opening the Door to Bonding

NOT ALL COMMUNITY SERVICES BLOCK GRANT RECOVERY ACT COSTS CLAIMED

JUt vengriy-- Review offederal Medicaid Claims Made by Inpatient Substance Abuse Treatment Facilities in New Jersey (A )

Management Advisory Report. PLP Processing Restrictions for Paying off Existing SBA Debt in a Change of Ownership Transaction

Nelson R. Bregon, General Deputy Assistant Secretary for Community Planning and Development. James D. McKay Regional Inspector General for Audit, 4AGA

UPDATED. OIG Guidelines for Evaluating State False Claims Acts

AUDIT REPORT. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's Fiscal Year 2014 Financial Statement Audit

AUDIT OF AN SBA GUARANTEED LOAN TO IROM CNC MACHINING, INC. AND IROM IMAGING, INC. Report Number: 7-17

U.S. Department of Energy Office of Inspector General Office of Audits and Inspections

G CHAPTER 8. EMPLOYEE DISHONESTY INSURANCE EXPLANATION AND REQUIREMENTS

Department of Homeland Security

Controls Over EPA s Compass Financial System Need to Be Improved

Napa County, California, Needs Additional Technical Assistance and Monitoring to Ensure Compliance with Federal Regulations

SUBCONTRACTOR LABOR AND MATERIAL PAYMENT BOND ("Bond") SURETY Address

Auditor General Procurement Processes Review - Bid Bonds/Performance Bonds

Public Assistance Alternative Procedures Pilot Program Guide for Debris Removal (Version 3) June 28, 2015

INTRODUCTION TO BID/PERFORMANCE AND PAYMENT BONDS AND THE SBA BOND GUARANTEE PROGRAM:

CHAPTER 179. BE IT ENACTED by the Senate and General Assembly of the State of New Jersey: 1. R.S.34: is amended to read as follows:

COSTS CHARGED TO HEAD START PROGRAM ADMINISTERED BY ROCKINGHAM COMMUNITY ACTION,

OIG Deployment Activities at FEMA's Joint Field Office in Charleston, West Virginia - Yeager Airport

2IÀFHRI,QVSHFWRU*HQHUDO

Audit of Creighton University s Administration of Its Federal TRIO Projects

Review of U.S. Coast Guard's FY 2014 Drug Control Performance Summary Report

COLORADO CLAIMED UNALLOWABLE MEDICAID NURSING FACILITY SUPPLEMENTAL PAYMENTS

THE FRAUD PREVENTION SYSTEM IDENTIFIED MILLIONS IN MEDICARE SAVINGS, BUT THE DEPARTMENT COULD STRENGTHEN SAVINGS DATA

Metropolitan Community College s Administration of the Title IV Programs FINAL AUDIT REPORT

The Environmental Careers Organization Reported Outlays for Five EPA Cooperative Agreements

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES OFFICE OF AUDIT SERVICES 233 NORTH MICHIGAN AVENUE CHICAGO, ILLINOIS April 23,2002

United States Department of Agriculture. OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAl

PERFORMANCE BONDS AND LABOUR AND MATERIAL PAYMENT BONDS: WHAT THE CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY SHOULD KNOW

Report Number: A

Office of Inspector General

Expedited Dispute Resolution Bond (P3 Form)

AN ACT IN THE COUNCIL OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

REPORT ON INDEPENDENT EVALUATION AND ASSESSMENT OF INTERNAL CONTROL FOR CONTRACT OVERSIGHT

Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority Office of the Inspector General Medicare Part B Reimbursements to Retirees

GAO FEDERAL STUDENT LOAN PROGRAMS. Opportunities Exist to Improve Audit Requirements and Oversight Procedures. Report to Congressional Committees

TREASURY INSPECTOR GENERAL FOR TAX ADMINISTRATION

AUDIT REPORT THE ADMINISTRATION OF CONTRACTS AND AGREEMENTS FOR LINGUISTIC SERVICES BY THE DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION AUGUST

EVALUATION REPORT. Weaknesses Identified During the FY 2014 Federal Information Security Management Act Review. March 13, 2015 REPORT NUMBER 15-07

JAMS Dispute Resolution Rules for Surety Bond Disputes

Security Concerns with Federal Emergency Management Agency's egrants Grant Management System

TREASURY INSPECTOR GENERAL FOR TAX ADMINISTRATION

U.S. Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation Board Should Determine the Cost Effectiveness of Performing Improper Payment Recovery Audits

In order to adjudicate an appeal, OPM requires claimants or their authorized representatives to submit the following information:

Transcription:

U.S. SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL WASHINGTON, D.C. 20416 AUDIT REPORT Issue Date: February 28, 2002 Number: 2-07 To: Robert J. Moffitt Associate Administrator, Office of Surety Guarantees From: Subject: Robert G. Seabrooks Assistant Inspector General for Auditing Audit of Safeco/First National Insurance Company Attached is the audit report on Safeco/First National Insurance Company issued by Cotton & Company LLP. The report discusses the following issues: (1) copies of SBA underwriting form numbers 1624 and 912 were not maintained for one bond, and (2) SBA was not notified of default in a timely manner for one bond. You may release this report to the duly authorized representative of Safeco/First National Insurance Company. The findings included in this report are based on the auditors conclusions. The findings and recommendations are subject to review, management decision, and corrective action by your office in accordance with existing Agency procedures for audit follow-up and resolution. Please provide us your proposed management decision for each recommendation on the attached forms 1824, Recommended Action Sheet, within 80 days. This report may contain proprietary information subject to the provisions of 18 USC 1905. Therefore, you should not release this report to the public or another agency without permission of the Office of Inspector General. Should you or your staff have any questions, please contact Robert Hultberg, Business Development Programs Group at (202) 205-7577. Attachments

INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS REPORT ON THE PERFORMANCE AUDIT OF SAFECO/FIRST NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY Performed by: Cotton & Company LLP Certified Public Accountants 333 North Fairfax Street, Suite 401 Alexandria, Virginia 22314

November 2, 2001 U.S. Small Business Administration Office of Inspector General BACKGROUND The Small Business Investment Act of 1958, as amended, authorized the U.S. Small Business Administration s (SBA) Surety Bond Guarantee Program (SBG) to assist small, emerging, and minority construction contractors. SBA indemnifies surety companies from potential losses by providing a Government guarantee on bonds issued to such contractors. SBA guarantees up to 90 percent of losses incurred by sureties for contracts not exceeding $1.25 million (increased to $2 million effective January 25, 2001). SBA s Office of Surety Guarantees (OSG) administers the SBG program. OBJECTIVE, SCOPE AND METHODOLOGY SBA s Office of Inspector General (OIG) requested Cotton & Company to conduct a performance audit of Safeco/First National Insurance Company. The primary objectives were to determine if Safeco/First National: 1. Complied with applicable policies and procedures, including SBA s policies and standards generally accepted by the surety industry in issuing SBA-guaranteed bonds. 2. Submitted claims and expenses to SBA that were allowable, allocable, and reasonable. 3. Accurately calculated fees due to SBA and remitted them in a timely manner. We obtained the universe of Safeco/First National bonds for which SBA had paid claims from October 1, 1999, through September 30, 2001. This universe contained eight bonds, and we randomly selected two as sample bonds for review. We also randomly selected two additional bonds originally approved in Fiscal Years (FYs) 2000 and 2001 for underwriting review only. Thus, our total sample size was 4 bonds with claims (net of recoveries) totaling $372,376.94. [FOIA Ex. 4]. We tested sample bonds for compliance with SBA regulations for underwriting and fees by reviewing underwriting files and Safeco/First National s accounting records. We tested claims incurred under sample bonds from October 1, 1999, through September 30, 2001, by reviewing Safeco/First National s supporting documentation in the claim files and accounting records. We obtained a list of all

SBA-guaranteed final bonds from October 1, 1999, through September 30, 2001, and identified contractors with total bonds exceeding $1.25 million ($2 million for bonds issued after January 25, 2001) for contracts with the same obligee and bond issue dates within several months. We then reviewed project descriptions to determine if the bonds were for a single project divided into more than one contract. We conducted fieldwork during October and November 2001 at Safeco/First National s offices in Redmond, Washington. The audit was conducted in accordance with Government Auditing Standards, 1994 Revision. AUDIT RESULTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Safeco/First National correctly calculated and remitted all sample bond fees to SBA in a timely manner. Safeco/First National did not always comply with SBA regulations for underwriting and servicing bonds and processing claims. Specifically, Safeco/First National did not maintain copies of SBA underwriting form numbers 1624 and 912 for one of four bonds tested. In addition, it did not notify SBA of default for one bond in a timely manner, as required by SBA regulations. We concluded that management and financial controls were adequate to protect assets and prevent errors and fraud, except as noted below. We concluded that Safeco/First National did not comply in all material aspects with SBA regulations for obtaining and maintaining documents to support proper underwriting of SBA bond guarantees. Also, Safeco/First National did not have procedures in place to ensure timely notification of default to SBA. We conducted an exit conference with Safeco/First National personnel on November 2, 2001. They generally agreed with factual aspects of the findings. Our findings and recommendations are discussed in detail below. Record Retention Safeco/First National did not maintain copies of SBA underwriting forms 1624 and 912 for one sample bond, as required by SBA regulations. Additionally, the surety was unable to obtain copies of these documents from their agent. Safeco/First National is required to provide critical underwriting documents that may be necessary to settle existing claims or defend or enhance any litigation actions against indemnitors, obligees, or other claimants. Contractor SBG No. Bond Date Missing Documents [FOIA Ex. 4] SBA Form 1624, 912 Title 13, CFR, Section 115.21(b), Audits and Investigations, requires a surety to maintain all documentation submitted by the principal in applying for the bond, for the term of each bond, plus additional time required to settle any claims for reimbursement from SBA and to attempt salvage or other recovery, plus an additional 3 years. Recommendation: We recommend that the OSG Associate Administrator advise Safeco/First National to implement and enforce policies and procedures that would ensure that all required SBA documentation for underwriting and servicing SBA-guaranteed bonds be maintained in accordance with SBA regulations. 2

Timely Notification of Default Safeco/First National did not notify SBA in a timely manner when the principal for one of the two bonds reviewed with claims activity defaulted. In the default notification letter that Safeco/First National sent to SBA, it acknowledged late notification of default. Safeco indicated that the late notification was the result of a change in personnel handling the file and the new individual was unfamiliar with the SBA reporting requirement. Safeco/First National emphasized, however, that its personnel are aware of the SBA reporting requirement. Contractor SBG No. Bond Default Date Date SBA Notified [FOIA Ex. 4 and 6] September 19, 1998 November 17, 1998 Title 13 CFR 115.65 (c)(2) defines other events requiring notification as follows: The PSB Surety must notify SBA within 30 calendar days of the name and address of any principal against whom legal action on the bond has been instituted; whenever an obligee has been declared in default; whenever the Surety has established or added to a claim reserve; of the recovery of any amounts on the guaranteed bond; and of any decision by the Surety to bond any such Principal again. Recommendation: We recommend that the OSG Associate Administrator advise Safeco/First National to continue to enforce its policies and procedures to ensure that SBA receives timely notification of default in accordance with SBA regulations. Safeco/First National s Response: Safeco/First National stated that they have reviewed the draft audit report and accept the findings as presented (see appendix). SBA MANAGEMENT S RESPONSE The Associate Administrator, Office of Surety Guarantees, agreed with the recommendations in our draft audit report. He stated that his office will implement the recommendations upon completion of the audit, as appropriate. 3

Attachment SAMPLE BONDS Sample No. Surety Bond Guarantee No. Safeco/First National Bond No. Contractor Name Bond Approval Date Bond Default Date 1 [FOIA Ex. 4 and 6] 2 3 4 N/A = Sample bond selected for underwriting review only.

APPENDIX SAFECO/FIRST NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY RESPONSE TO THE DRAFT REPORT

REPORT DISTRIBUTION Recipient No. of Copies Associate Deputy Administrator for Capital Access...1 General Counsel...2 Office of the Chief Financial Officer Attention: [FOIA Ex. 6]...1 2