EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM TO THE INDEPENDENT REVIEW OF DETERMINATIONS (ADOPTION AND FOSTERING) (WALES) REGULATIONS 2010

Similar documents
EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM TO. The Adoption Agencies (Wales) (Amendment) Regulations 2012

THE INDEPENDENT REVIEW OF DETERMINATIONS (ADOPTION) (WALES) REGULATIONS 2006

Explanatory Memorandum to The Child Minding and Day Care Exceptions (Wales) (Amendment) Order 2016

Carers (Scotland) Bill [AS INTRODUCED]

2015 No. (W. ) SOCIAL CARE, WALES. The Care and Support (Business Failure) (Wales) Regulations 2015 W E L S H S T A T U T O R Y I N S T R U M E N T S

EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM TO THE DEBT RELIEF ORDERS (DESIGNATION OF COMPETENT AUTHORITIES) (AMENDMENT) REGULATIONS No.

EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM TO THE CONDITIONAL FEE AGREEMENTS ORDER No. 689

Explanatory Memorandum to the Government of Maintained Schools (Clerk to a Governing Body)(Wales) Regulations 2013

EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM TO THE COMPENSATION (CLAIMS MANAGEMENT SERVICES) (AMENDMENT) REGULATIONS No. 3239

EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM TO THE UNIVERSAL CREDIT (CONSEQUENTIAL, SUPPLEMENTARY, INCIDENTAL AND MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS) REGULATIONS No.

Explanatory Memorandum to the Conservation of Habitats and Species (Amendment) Regulations 2012

2012 No. 115 EDUCATION, ENGLAND. The Education (School Teachers Appraisal) (England) Regulations 2012

Proposed Mental Health

Data Retention and Investigatory Powers Bill

Performance management for headteachers

STATEMENT OF PURPOSE STATEMENT PURPOSE. This document and all contents copyright Foster Care Link Abuse of copyright may lead to prosecution.

2016 No. 253 HEALTH AND SAFETY. The Health and Safety and Nuclear (Fees) Regulations 2016

Identity Cards Act 2006

Care Act 2014 CHAPTER 23. Explanatory Notes have been produced to assist in the understanding of this Act and are available separately

Get in on the Act: Children and Families Act Corporate

INTRODUCTION 1 STRUCTURE AND APPROACH 1 CONTEXT AND PURPOSE 2 STATEMENT OF PURPOSE 3

How To Manage School Performance

Common Best Practice code FoR HiGH-Quality internships

Improving the operation of the Construction Industry Scheme

STATES OF JERSEY. DRAFT CRIMINAL JUSTICE (YOUNG OFFENDERS) (No. 2) (JERSEY) LAW 201-

EQUALITY ACT 2010: The public sector Equality Duty: reducing bureaucracy. Policy review paper

Energy Act 2013 CHAPTER 32. Explanatory Notes have been produced to assist in the understanding of this Act and are available separately

COMMUNITY EMPOWERMENT (SCOTLAND) BILL [AS AMENDED AT STAGE 2]

Appendix D. Adoption Service Statement of Purpose

The Children and Families Act 2014

2014 No (L. 31) TRIBUNALS AND INQUIRIES. The Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Rules 2014

Practice Note. 10 (Revised) October 2010 AUDIT OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF PUBLIC SECTOR BODIES IN THE UNITED KINGDOM

Part 3D - Officers' Employment Procedure Rules 1

2015 No FINANCIAL SERVICES AND MARKETS. The Small and Medium Sized Business (Finance Platforms) Regulations 2015

CONTROL OF DOGS (SCOTLAND) BILL

Insurance Contracts Bill

Wales Bill EXPLANATORY NOTES. Explanatory notes to the Bill, prepared by the Wales Office, are published separately as Bill 5 EN.

2015 No LANDLORD AND TENANT, ENGLAND. The Assured Shorthold Tenancy Notices and Prescribed Requirements (England) Regulations 2015

PAYMENT OF UNION SUBSCRIPTIONS THROUGH CHECK OFF. Guidance

How To Travel In Wales

Mesothelioma Act 2014

EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM TO THE COMPANIES ACT 2006 (ANNUAL RETURNS) REGULATIONS No. [XXXX]

EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM TO THE CONTRACTS FOR DIFFERENCE (ELECTRICITY SUPPLIER OBLIGATIONS) REGULATIONS No. [XXXX]

FOSTERING STATEMENT OF PURPOSE

EDUCATION AND ADOPTION BILL EXPLANATORY NOTES

2009 No. 309 NATIONAL HEALTH SERVICE, ENGLAND SOCIAL CARE, ENGLAND

2014 No EDUCATION, ENGLAND. The Special Educational Needs (Personal Budgets) Regulations 2014

RURAL AFFAIRS, CLIMATE CHANGE AND ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE AGENDA. 5th Meeting, 2012 (Session 4) Wednesday 22 February 2012

Fostering for Adoption BECOMING A CARER

Public Audit (Wales) Act 2004

2006 No. 246 TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF EMPLOYMENT. The Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006

The Rehabilitation of Offenders Act 1974 (Exclusions and Exceptions) (Scotland) Amendment Order 2015 Draft

Hiring agency staff during strike action: reforming regulation

2011 No (W. 316) EDUCATION, WALES. The School Teacher Appraisal (Wales) Regulations 2011 W E L S H S T A T U T O R Y I N S T R U M E N T S

Governors, Head teachers, Teachers and Local Authorities

Financial Services Act 2010

Gender Recognition Act 2004

2009 No INSOLVENCY, ENGLAND AND WALES. The Insolvency (Amendment) (No. 2) Rules 2009

AMENDMENTS TO LEGISLATION

PRACTICE DIRECTION 12A CARE, SUPERVISION AND OTHER PART 4 PROCEEDINGS: GUIDE TO CASE MANAGEMENT

HEALTH INSURANCE (PERFORMERS LIST FOR GENERAL MEDICAL PRACTITIONERS) (JERSEY) REGULATIONS 201-

2015 No CONSUMER PROTECTION. The Alternative Dispute Resolution for Consumer Disputes (Amendment) Regulations 2015

How To Stop The Transitional Market From Trading In Electricity

Well-being of Future Generations (Wales) Bill

2015 No FINANCIAL SERVICES AND MARKETS. The Small and Medium Sized Businesses (Credit Information) Regulations 2015

PRACTICE DIRECTION AMENDMENTS

NASUWT/NUT MODEL SCHOOL PAY POLICY

European Union Referendum Bill 2015 House of Commons Second Reading briefing

Care and Social Services Inspectorate Wales

NOTE - This document is provided for guidance only and does not purport to be a legal interpretation. PERSONAL INSOLVENCY ACT 2012

INSOLVENCY GUIDANCE NOTE STATEMENT OF INSOLVENCY PRACTICE 9 (NI): REMUNERATION OF INSOLVENCY OFFICE HOLDERS NORTHERN IRELAND

Framework for Compliance Audits Under the Employment Equity Act

The Court of Protection Rules 2007

Freedom of Information Act 2000

Apprenticeship standards funding rules 2016 to 2017

The Draft Child Support (Collection and Enforcement) (Amendments) Regulations 2012

Restructure, Redeployment and Redundancy

ASYLUM AND IMMIGRATION TRIBUNAL

PACT Adoption Service Statement of Purpose 2015

How To Amend The Civil Procedure Rules

PUBLIC SERVICE ACT An Act to make provision in respect of the public service of Lesotho and for related matters. PART I - PRELIMINARY

Section 69 Order: modification of the Solicitors Regulation Authority Compensation Fund

STATUTORY RULES OF NORTHERN IRELAND No. 193 MENTAL HEALTH. The Mental Health Review Tribunal (Northern Ireland) Rules 1986

COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL. Proposal for an Interinstitutional Agreement on Better Regulation

2014 No ELECTRICITY. The Contracts for Difference (Standard Terms) Regulations 2014

Corporate Parenting Board 6 January 2016

2014 No. PENSIONS. The Occupational Pension Schemes (Schemes that were Contracted-out) Regulations 2014

DELEGATED POWERS AND LAW REFORM COMMITTEE

National Standards for Safer Better Healthcare

GOVERNANCE AND ACCOUNTILIBILITY FRAMEWORK

2015 No FINANCIAL SERVICES AND MARKETS. The Small and Medium Sized Business (Credit Information) Regulations 2015

Moray Council. Adoption Plan

Insolvency (Scotland) Rules 1986 (SI 1986/1915) Citation and commencement Application... 12

Mental Health Act 2007

Personal Injury Accreditation. Initial application guidance notes

2015 No. 548 (L. 6) MENTAL CAPACITY, ENGLAND AND WALES. The Court of Protection (Amendment) Rules 2015

Adoption. /adoptionandfostering

2015 No PUBLIC SECTOR INFORMATION. The Re-use of Public Sector Information Regulations 2015

LEGAL SCHEME REGULATIONS

CONWY COUNTY BOROUGH COUNCIL FOSTERING SERVICE STATEMENT OF PURPOSE

Transcription:

EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM TO THE INDEPENDENT REVIEW OF DETERMINATIONS (ADOPTION AND FOSTERING) (WALES) REGULATIONS 2010 This Explanatory Memorandum has been prepared by the Directorate of Children s Health and Social Services and is laid before the National Assembly for Wales in conjunction with the above subordinate legislation and in accordance with Standing Order 24.1 Minister s Declaration In my view, this Explanatory Memorandum gives a fair and reasonable view of the expected impact of The Independent Review of Determinations (Adoption and Fostering) (Wales) Regulations 2010 and I am satisfied that the benefits outweigh any costs. Gwenda Thomas Deputy Minister for Social Services 11 March 2010 1

1. Description These regulations make provision for the review, by an independent panel, of qualifying determinations made by adoption agencies and fostering service providers. A qualifying determination is one that relates to (as the case may be) suitability of a prospective adopter to adopt a child; suitability to act as a local authority foster parent 1 ; or the terms of approval as a local authority foster parent; or the disclosure of the adoption information. The IRM Regulations set out the function, membership and operation of independent review panels. 2. Matters of special interest to the Constitutional Affairs Committee None 3. Legislative background These regulations are made under Section 8(2) of, and Schedule 1 to, the Children and Young Persons Act 2008 which make various amendments consequential on and Supplementary to the provisions of section 8, including a power to make regulations about an independent review mechanism for qualifying determinations relating to local authority foster parents. Section 8(3) of the 2008 Act provides that until the coming into force of section 8(1), Schedule 2 to the Children Act 1989 has effect with the Modifications specified in Schedule 2 to the 2008 Act. Those modifications include a power to make regulations about an independent review mechanism for certain qualifying determinations relating to local authority foster parents The Adoption Agencies (Wales) Regulations 2005 (S.I. 2005/1313) (W.95) make provision in relation to the operation of adoption agencies, including their duties in relation to the assessment of the suitability of a prospective adopter to adopt a child. Sections 56 to 65 of the Adoption and Children Act 2002 (c.38) provide for the disclosure of information in relation to a person s adoption. The Adoption Information and Intermediary Services (Post-Commencement Adoptions) (Wales) Regulations 2005 (S.I. 2005/2689 (W.189) make provision for the disclosure of adoption information and applications for such disclosure in relation to adoption orders made after 30 December 2005. Section 12 of the Adoption and Children Act 2002 (as amended by section 57 of the Children Act 2004 (c.31) and section 34 of the Children and Young Persons Act 2008 (c.23)) provides that regulations made under section 9 of that Act may establish a procedure under which any person in respect of whom a qualifying determination has been made by an adoption agency may apply to a panel constituted by Welsh Ministers (in relation to Wales) for a review of that determination. 1 Local authority foster parent is defined in section 23(3) of the Children Act 1989. The term includes foster parents approved by a local authority and those approved by an independent fostering provider. 2

The Fostering Services (Wales) Regulations 2003 ( FSR ) (S.I 2003/237) (W.35) make provision in relation to the operation of fostering service providers, including the assessment of the suitability of a person to act as a local authority foster parent. The IRM Regulations revoke the Independent Review of Determinations (Adoption) (Wales) Regulations 2005, SI 2005/1819 (W.147) but replicate provision made in those Regulations in respect of qualifying determinations relating to adoption with some minor changes. This statutory instrument follows the negative resolution procedure. 4. Purpose & intended effect of the legislation The lack of an independent mechanism for reviewing a fostering provider s decision not to approve a person as a foster carer is a concern to existing and prospective foster carers. When approval has been turned down, an individual is entitled to request a review, but this is currently undertaken by the provider s panel which made a recommendation regarding the original decision. This is in contrast to adopters who can choose review either by the agency s panel or by the independent review mechanism. The Independent Review of Determinations (Adoption and Fostering)(Wales) Regulations 2010 make provision for the review, by an independent panel, of qualifying determinations made by adoption agencies and fostering service providers. A qualifying determination is one that relates to (as the case may be) suitability of a prospective adopter to adopt a child; suitability to act as a local authority foster parent; or the terms of approval as a local authority foster parent; or the disclosure of the adoption information. The IRM Regulations set out the function, membership and operation of independent review panels. The introduction of the IRM for fostering brings the assessment process for local authority foster parents in line with the assessment process for prospective adopters. The function of the independent review panel is to consider the qualifying determination and to make a recommendation to the adoption agency or fostering service provider which made the qualifying determination. The adoption agency or fostering service provider must than take that recommendation into account when making its final determination, in accordance with the (separate) regulations relating to the making of the relevant decision. By allowing the review process to be independent of the original provider panel, it is expected to contribute to improving the recruitment, retention and supply of foster carers. Whilst the current supply of foster carers have the capacity to deal with current cases, the objective is for placements to better match the individual needs of looked after children, providing them with increased stability. We anticipate that as a result, children in foster care will enjoy better levels of 3

wellbeing, are more likely to be engaged with education and will avoid poor outcomes such as teenage pregnancy and involvement in crime. Qualifying determination (fostering) The IRM will enable prospective and approved foster parents to apply to Welsh Ministers for the review by an independent panel of a qualifying determination by their fostering service provider, as an alternative to making representation about the determination to the provider. The review will be conducted by an independent review panel appointed by Welsh Ministers. A qualifying determination (in relation to fostering) is a determination by a provider under the Fostering Services Regulations made on or after 2 April 2010 that it: Proposes not to approve the foster parent as a foster parent; Proposes to terminate a foster parent s approval; or Proposes to revise the terms of a foster parent s approval. If the determination is made because the person, or a member of their household has committed a specified offence or been cautioned in respect of a specified offence and admitted to it (see regulation 27 of the Fostering Services (Wales) Regulations 2003), the determination is not a qualifying determination within the meaning of the Independent Review of Determinations (Adoption and Fostering)(Wales) Regulations 2010 and the provider does not need to notify the person that they may apply to Welsh Ministers for a review. Process The FSR (as amended by the Fostering Services (Wales)(Amendment) Regulations 2010 will require fostering service providers, from 2 April 2010 to inform prospective and approved foster parents ( prospective/foster parents ), on the making of a determination, that they may within 28 days: Make representation to the provider; or (unless the determination was made pursuant to regulation 27(6)) apply to Welsh Ministers for a review of the determination by an independent panel. The provider cannot make its decision until: (a) 28 calendar days has elapsed and the provider has received no representations from the prospective/foster parent and no notification that the individual has applied to Welsh Ministers for a review of the qualifying determination; or (b) The fostering panel or independent review panel (as relevant) has made its recommendation. If the individual makes representations to the provider, the provider will refer the case to their own fostering panel in accordance with the FSR (W). The 4

fostering panel will make a fresh recommendation to the provider. This is currently the only option available for a review of such determinations. If the individual chooses the new option of applying to Welsh Ministers for a review of the determination by an independent panel, Welsh Ministers will set up a review panel. The panel will review all the information that was provided to the provider s fostering panel and, after a hearing at which the individual will be able to make oral submissions (as well as written submissions beforehand), make a fresh recommendation as to the suitability of the individual to be a foster parent, and/or as to the terms of the approval as the case may be. The fostering service provider will be required to take this recommendation into account in coming to its decision. There will be no cost to the individual applying to the IRM, but a contribution to the cost of a review will be recovered from the provider (regulation 21 of the IRM Regulations) IRM Adoption An IRM for adoption has been in place since 2005. The IRM Regulations revoke and replace the Independent Review of Determinations (Adoptions)(Wales) Regulations 2005 with the following amendments: A duty on adoption agencies to pay Welsh Ministers a sum set by them to contribute to the cost to them of performing their independent review functions. The contribution has been set at 2,227 in line with England. There will be no cost to the individual applying to the IRM A duty on adoption agencies so far as is reasonably practicable to provide any information or assistance requested by the review panel. This change has been made to be in line with the IRM for fostering. The Adoption Agencies (Wales) Regulations 2005 already provide that, where representations are made to the agency (rather than an application to the IRM) and the case is referred to the adoption panel of the adoption agency), the adoption agency must obtain, so far as is reasonably practicable any other relevant information requested by the panel and send that information to the panel. To date, there has been no express duty to provide information or assistance to independent review panels, but in practice, adoption agencies have been providing information or assistance as requested by the independent review panel since the IRM for adoption came into force in 2005. To confirm that, where the independent review panel makes a recommendation to the adoption agency that the prospective adopter is suitable to adopt a child, the panel may consider and give advice to the adoption agency about the number of children the prospective adopter may be suitable to adopt, their age range, sex, likely needs and background. This change brings independent review panels into line with adoption panels and the IRM for fostering. 5

Consolidation The IRM Regulations will provide a single instrument for the procedural aspects relating to both the IRM for adoption and the IRM for fostering. Implementation It is intended that these regulation come into force on 2 April 2010. In England parallel legislation was introduced on 1 April 2009. Implementation of the legislation has been delayed in Wales whilst funding was being secured for implementation of this and other provisions in the Children and Young Persons Act 2008. We are not aware of any legal and/or other implications for the Assembly should the intended target dates for making these regulations not be achieved. 5. Consultation Consultation has been undertaken and details are included in the Regulatory Impact assessment (RIA) below. 6. Regulatory Impact Assessment (RIA) The RIA is attached below. 6

PART 2 REGULATORY IMPACT ASSESSMENT 7. Options Two options have been considered. Option One: Making no policy change Option Two: Implementing an optional Independent Review Mechanism (IRM) through regulations under the Children and Young Persons Act 2008. It was decided that change is necessary in order to improve the transparency of the approval process for foster carers and bring it into line with other parts of the children s social care workforce. 8. Costs & benefits Option One There are no benefits to be gained from Option 1. Option Two We expect the following benefits from implementing policy at option 2: A realisation of Welsh Assembly Government s commitment to introduce an IRM for fostering; Bringing the fostering review process in line with other members of the children s workforce who have access to an independent review of decisions; Giving foster parents a choice about how they have their agency s qualifying determination reviewed; Reinforcing a perception of fairness, transparency and independence in relation to the foster parent s approval system; Addressing concerns about the independence of the approval process, increasing the number of applicants to fostering, thus increasing the pool of foster parents, which should enable better placement matches and therefore contribute to better outcomes for looked after children. Improving the approval process for foster carers and enabling better placement matches will contribute to better outcomes for looked after children. A range of benefits can result but cannot be estimated accurately. It is hoped that improving the transparency of the approvals process will help to attract more people to become foster carers. Current estimates by the Fostering Network indicate a shortage of 750 foster carers in Wales. By allowing prospective and current foster carers the choice of having decisions about their approval reviewed by an independent panel it is expected to contribute to improving the recruitment, retention and supply of foster carers to 7

achieve the policy objective is for placement to better match the individual needs of looked after children. We expect that as a result of better matching, children in foster carer will benefit from having higher levels of wellbeing, more likelihood of being engaged with education and also avoid poor outcomes such as teenage pregnancy and involvement with crime. Educational outcomes are predictors of outcomes in later life. Attaining five or more GCSE s at grades A* to C was identified in the National Child Development Study as the threshold between those whose adult lifestyle was similar to that of their original families and those who had escaped from disadvantage; (Pilling 1990). Jackson and Martin (1998, 1998b, 2002) found that the factors most strongly associated with later educational success for children in care were: Stability and continuity of home and school placements where possible remaining in the same school when a placement change is unavoidable. Educationally successful care leavers viewed positive encouragement from carers or parents as the most important contributory factor in their achievement. The educational background and expectations of carers is highly significant; Peer support of friends who do well at school; A significant adult a role model or mentor (not necessarily a parent or carer) who offered consistent support, encouragement and advocacy was identified as an important factor by high achieving care leavers. Regular school attendance; Developing out of school interest. Assuming that by introducing the IRM will improve the stability and continuity of home and school placements of children being placed in foster care, we expect that educational attainment will improve for foster children. As at 31 March 2009 78% of all looked after children were in foster homes. Costs The costs include 56 k plus initial start up costs of 16k to be paid to the contractor running the IRM on behalf of Welsh Ministers and 33,405 k which is the estimated annual cost to the sector of the standard charge per review to be made by a provider whose decision is considered by the IRM based on an estimate of 15 in a year. We do not expect the introduction of the independent review mechanism to introduce significant administrative or financial burdens on individual fostering providers because foster carers can already apply for a review from the provider s panel. This means that (1) fostering providers are already used to preparing copies of documentation and making staff available to attend panel meetings for the purpose of reviews, and (2) the papers would still have to be 8

provided by the fostering providers if the applicant had decided to apply to the provider s panel rather than to the independent review mechanism. The introduction of the independent review mechanism for decisions relating to fostering will affect all fostering service providers, including those that are small businesses (but not small businesses generally). However the impact on such providers should be minimal. The requirement to inform prospective/foster parents about the option of seeking review of a qualifying determination by an independent review panel will be included in the notice that providers are already required to send; and the requirement to provide information to the independent review panel replaces the provide information to the independent review panel replaces the current practice of providing this information to the fostering panel. Fostering service providers will only be charged a contribution when a determination made by the provider is to be reviewed by the IRM panel. The number of reviews per provider should be in proportion to the number of foster parents a provider deals with and so smaller independent fostering service providers should have fewer determinations than larger providers and thus costs should be in proportion to the size of the provider. Similarly, Adoption agencies will only be charged a contribution when a determination made by the provider is reviewed by the IRM panel. Again, the number of reviews per provider should be in proportion to the number of adoptions the agency deals with and so smaller adoption agencies should have fewer determinations than larger agencies and thus costs would be in proportion to the size of the provider. The impact on businesses, charities or voluntary bodies is minimal. Independent fostering service providers (which discharge fostering functions on behalf of local authorities may be businesses, charities or voluntary bodies) already have a duty to refer representations regarding a qualifying determination to their fostering panel for review. All fostering service providers will be required to contribute a standard amount ( 2,227) each time a qualifying determination which they have made is reviewed by the IRM panel. However, our estimates indicate that the annual number of IRM reviews per provider is likely to be small and funding is being made available to local authorities as part of the budget for implementing the Children and Young Persons Act 2008. The impact on the public sector (local authorities) will be similar to the impact on independent fostering service providers. The Welsh Local Government Association has been consulted and is content with the proposals. It is difficult to estimate likely take up of IRM Reviews by potential/existing fostering carers but experience of the Adoption IRM to date suggests no more than 15 fostering and adoption IRMs a year in total. In addition it is difficult to gauge the impact the IRM will have on foster carer recruitment. Estimates on potential benefit to educational attainment provided above but lack of clear evidence to establish causality. 9

9. Consultation An eight week consultation period on the draft regulations took place over July and August 2009. An eight week consultation period was considered sufficient because: The introduction of the IRM for fostering was debated in Parliament during the passage of the Children and Young Persons Act 2008. No concerns were raised. The changes will not affect the public at large or business generally, so a shorter consultation that targets key stakeholders such as independent fostering and adoption agencies and foster parent and adoption representative bodies was considered more effective. Copies of the consultation were sent to all independent fostering providers and adoption agencies. In addition the consultation was posted on the Welsh Assembly Government website and the Fostering Network website inviting responses from all their members including foster carers. The majority of respondents (86%) agreed with the general approach to the Independent Review Mechanism for fostering commenting that it would improve fairness and transparency for the applicant. As a result of the consultation we propose to amend the regulations to: (i) Amend the constitution and tenure of existing adoption and fostering panels and their power to seek information legal and medical assistance; (ii) Amend the time limit for prospective adopters to apply to Welsh Ministers to have their case reviewed. (iii) Reduce the requirement for social workers on the panel to possess social work post qualifying experience from 5 years to 3 years. (iv) Introduce a fee to adoption and fostering agencies for each application for an independent review. Introducing a charge for fostering service providers and adoption agencies The majority of respondents (56%) disagreed with the proposal to charge fostering service providers and adoption agencies a contribution towards the review. However the pressing need for the panel to be seen to be independent and transparent in line with the IRM panels in England outweighed the argument for change. Representation from the Administrative Justice and Tribunals Council also provided an argument in favour of outsourcing the operation of the IRM to an independent body which necessitated the introduction of a charge to Fostering providers and adoption agencies. The charge will contribute to the cost of the operation of the Independent Review Mechanism process and also incentivise service providers to provide a robust and equitable service to prospective adopters and prospective and existing foster carers. 10

The cost will be set at 2,227 for each IRD review in line with charges made by DCSF. Drawing on past figures and England s operation of the service for the past year, we estimate around 15 IRMs a year. IRD Providers will only contribute to the cost of reviews of qualifying determinations that they themselves have made; the number of reviews should therefore be proportional to the size of the agency. We propose to introduce a set fee and monitor the situation closely in its first year of operation and annually thereafter. The financial implications on local authorities in relation to the IRM have been accounted for within an uplift of 2 m in the 2010/11 settlement to cover burdens arising from implementation of provisions on the Children and Young Persons Act 2008, including the introduction of the IRM for fostering. 10. Competition Assessment No impact on competition was identified and as such it was not considered necessary to carry out a detailed assessment. 11. Post implementation review The Welsh Assembly Government will monitor the effectiveness of the Regulations through its management of the IRM contract and will meet regularly with the British Association for Adoption and Fostering (BAAF), the contractor running the IRM contractor to monitor quality assurance of all aspects of the contractors work programme. The contractor will provide the Directorate of Children s Health and Social Services with timely and ongoing evaluation feedback including the provision of information on customer satisfaction. We will gather evidence (BAAF) of their views on its implementation and the number of applications to the IRM. Using existing data collection on looked after children, we will monitor placement stability and outcomes for children and track improvements year on year on this policy. 11