DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES OFFICE OF AUDIT SERVICES 233 NORTH MICHIGAN AVENUE. August 4, 2008



Similar documents
MAY Report Number: A-OI

JUt vengriy-- Review offederal Medicaid Claims Made by Inpatient Substance Abuse Treatment Facilities in New Jersey (A )

May 22, Report Number: A

JUl ' Review ofmedicaid Claims Made by Freestanding Residential Treatment Facilities in New York State (A )

June 13, Report Number: A

March 23, Report Number: A

("t>".4:.. ~.,~f- ;\~Uf.~ APR San Francisco, CA Report Number: A

RHODE ISLAND HOSPICE GENERAL INPATIENT CLAIMS

MASSACHUSETTS MEDICAID PAYMENTS TO ESSEX PARK REHABILITATION AND NURSING CENTER DID NOT ALWAYS COMPLY WITH FEDERAL AND STATE REQUIREMENTS

J:::'~~ c.4;t: Regional Inspector General for Audit Services. June 17,2008. Report Number: A

perform cost settlements to ensure that future final payments for school-based services are based on actual costs.

)1VC(~J1~J~l AUG 1 ~,U08. Sincerely, Report Number: A-OI Dear Ms. Favors:

COLORADO CLAIMED UNALLOWABLE MEDICAID NURSING FACILITY SUPPLEMENTAL PAYMENTS

COLORADO CLAIMED UNALLOWABLE MEDICAID INPATIENT SUPPLEMENTAL PAYMENTS

Report Number: A

~ 1AY Patrie';;. cogley:'>~o. Report Number: A

ARKANSAS GENERALLY SUPPORTED ITS CLAIM FOR FEDERAL MEDICAID REIMBURSEMENT

JUN Review of Termination Claim for Postretirement Benefit Costs Made by CareFirst. Maryland, Incorporated (A )

Montana Did Not Properly Pay Medicare Part B Deductibles and Coinsurance for Outpatient Services (A )

i;; .j. \::::l' P: t~

May 12, Report Number: A Mr. Trace Woodward Finance Director National Heritage Insurance Company 402 Otterson Drive Chico, CA 95928

Department of Health and Human Services OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL

Review of Medicaid Upper-Payment-Limit Requirements for Kansas Nursing Facility Reimbursement (A )

, MAY. oß.vi.. Daniel R. Levinson ~ ~ .~~.vi...

Page 2 Ms. Janna Zumbrun. HHS Action Official:

APR,: Charlene Frizzera Acting Administrator Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. FROM: Daniel R. Levinson ~,u,l, ~.~ Inspector General

Dennis G. Smith Director, Center for Medicaid and State Operations

NEW JERSEY IMPROPERLY CLAIMED MEDICAID REIMBURSEMENT FOR SOME HOME HEALTH CLAIMS SUBMITTED BY HOME HEALTH AGENCIES

OREGON DID NOT BILL MANUFACTURERS FOR REBATES FOR PHYSICIAN-ADMINISTERED DRUGS DISPENSED TO ENROLLEES OF MEDICAID MANAGED-CARE ORGANIZATIONS

MEDICARE CONTRACTORS PAYMENTS TO PROVIDERS FOR HOSPITAL OUTPATIENT DENTAL SERVICES IN JURISDICTION K DID NOT COMPLY WITH MEDICARE REQUIREMENTS

MEDICARE COMPLIANCE FOLLOWUP REVIEW OF BOSTON MEDICAL CENTER

OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL

THE FRAUD PREVENTION SYSTEM IDENTIFIED MILLIONS IN MEDICARE SAVINGS, BUT THE DEPARTMENT COULD STRENGTHEN SAVINGS DATA

Maryland Misallocated Millions to Establishment Grants for a Health Insurance Marketplace (A )

Department of Health and Human Services OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL

/-..~.~ JAN Mr. Dennis Conroy, SPHR

August 9, Report Number: A

SEP f Nationwide Review of Inpatient Rehabilitation Facilities' Compliance With Medicare's Transfer Regulation (A )

Region VII 601 East 12 th Street Room 0429 April 11, 2011 Kansas City, Missouri 64106

MORRISTOWN MEDICAL CENTER INCORRECTLY BILLED MEDICARE INPATIENT CLAIMS WITH KWASHIORKOR

OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL

MOUNT SINAI MEDICAL CENTER INCORRECTLY BILLED MEDICARE INPATIENT CLAIMS WITH KWASHIORKOR

Review of Arizona s Medicaid Claims for School-Based Health Services (A )

JUl Review of Abortion-Related Laboratory Claims Billed as Family Planning Under the New York State Medicaid Program (A )

Page 2 Kerry Weems. We recommend that the State agency: refund to the Federal Government $29,759,384 in unallowable costs claimed for TCM services;

/Diann M. Saltman/ for George M. Reeb Acting Deputy Inspector General for Audit Services

THE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY INFRASTRUCTURE

OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL

Review Of Hartford Hospital s Controls To Ensure Accuracy Of Wage Data Used For Calculating Inpatient Prospective Payment System Wage Indexes

OREGON PROPERLY VERIFIED CORRECTION OF DEFICIENCIES IDENTIFIED DURING SURVEYS OF NURSING HOMES PARTICIPATING IN MEDICARE AND MEDICAID

REVIEW OF MEDICARE CLAIMS FOR AIR AMBULANCE SERVICES PAID TO NATIVE AMERICAN AIR AMBULANCE

NOT ALL COMMUNITY SERVICES BLOCK GRANT RECOVERY ACT COSTS CLAIMED

JUN SUBJECT: Review of Head Start Board of Directors, Inc., for the Period September 1,2006, Through October 23,2007 (A-OI )

/Lori S. Pilcher/ Assistant Inspector General for Grants, Internal Activities, and Information Technology Audits

MEDICARE INAPPROPRIATELY PAID HOSPITALS INPATIENT CLAIMS SUBJECT TO THE POSTACUTE CARE TRANSFER POLICY

,.~. ReportNumber: A-O July2, DEPARTlVIENT OF HEALTH AND HUlVlAl'i SERVICES

DEC 1 9. Dennis G. Smith Director. Center for Medicaid and State kerations. Deputy ~nspectdrgeneral for Audit Services

INFORMATION SECURITY AT THE HEALTH RESOURCES AND SERVICES ADMINISTRATION NEEDS IMPROVEMENT BECAUSE CONTROLS WERE NOT FULLY IMPLEMENTED AND MONITORED

In total, Massachusetts overstated its Medicaid claim for reimbursement by $5,312,447 (Federal share).

Review of New Jersey s Medicaid School-Based Health Claims Submitted by Public Consulting Group, Inc. (A )

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES OFFICE OF AUDIT SERVICES 233 NORTH MICHIGAN AVENUE CHICAGO, ILLINOIS June 30, 2004

COSTS CHARGED TO HEAD START PROGRAM ADMINISTERED BY ROCKINGHAM COMMUNITY ACTION,

CMS DID NOT ALWAYS MANAGE AND OVERSEE CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE

Review of Medicaid Claims for Adult Mental Health Rehabilitation Services Made by Community Residence Providers in New Jersey (A )

REVIEW OF MEDICARE CONTRACTOR INFORMATION SECURITY PROGRAM EVALUATIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2013

Hazardary Subrecipient Costs For Yale University and Roger Williams Hospital

Department of Health and Human Services OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL

CIN: A Ms. Elizabeth Huidekoper Vice President for Finance Harvard University Massachusetts Hall Cambridge. Massachusetts

TEXAS MADE INCORRECT MEDICAID ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORD INCENTIVE PAYMENTS

Review of Georgia s Title IV-E Adoption Assistance Costs (A )

MEDICAID DRUG PRICE COMPARISON: AVERAGE SALES PRICE TO AVERAGE WHOLESALE PRICE

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES OFFICE OF AUDIT SERVICES 233 NORTH MICHIGAN AVENUE CHICAGO, ILLINOIS April 23,2002

January 18, Donald M. Berwick, M.D. Administrator Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. /Daniel R. Levinson/ Inspector General

Review of Medicaid Personal Care Services Claims Submitted by Providers in North Carolina (A )

AGENCY FOR HEALTHCARE RESEARCH AND QUALITY: MONITORING PATIENT SAFETY GRANTS

MEDICARE BENEFICIARIES PAID NEARLY HALF OF THE C OSTS FOR OUTPATIENT SERVICES AT CRITICAL ACCESS HOSPITALS

16 XU AUG. Review of Oregon s Medicaid Payments for School-Based Health Services Direct Care in State Fiscal Year 2000 (A )

. 4 " ~ f.".2 DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL. December 19,2003. Our Reference: Report Number A-O

COMPARING PHARMACY REIMBURSEMENT: MEDICARE PART D TO MEDICAID

OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL

HEALTH INSURANCE MARKETPLACES GENERALLY PROTECTED PERSONALLY IDENTIFIABLE INFORMATION BUT COULD IMPROVE CERTAIN INFORMATION SECURITY CONTROLS

Medicaid Revocation of Medicare DME Suppliers

NOT ALL OF THE COLORADO MARKETPLACE S INTERNAL CONTROLS WERE EFFECTIVE IN ENSURING THAT INDIVIDUALS WERE ENROLLED IN QUALIFIED HEALTH PLANS ACCORDING

NORTH CAROLINA CLAIMED FEDERAL MEDICAID REIMBURSEMENT FOR DENTAL SERVICES THAT DID NOT ALWAYS COMPLY WITH FEDERAL AND STATE REQUIREMENTS

THE OFFICE OF THE NATIONAL COORDINATOR FOR HEALTH INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY S OVERSIGHT OF THE TESTING

AUG Ambulance suppliers did not always comply with consolidated billing biling requirements in CY 2006.

OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL

REVIEW OF MEDICARE CLAIMS

CALCULATION OF VOLUME- WEIGHTED AVERAGE SALES PRICE FOR MEDICARE PART B PRESCRIPTION DRUGS

MEDICARE S NATIONAL CORRECT CODING INITIATIVE

To facilitate identification, please refer to Common Identification No. A-05-0 l in all correspondence relating to this report.

CDC S ETHICS PROGRAM FOR SPECIAL GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES

CHICAGO DEPARTMENT OF FAMILY

Department of Health and Human Services

EARLY ASSESSMENT OF REVIEW MEDICAID INTEGRITY CONTRACTORS

FEB To facilitate identification, please refer to report number A in all correspondence relating to this report.

Jackie Gamer, Consortium Administrator Consortium for Medicaid and Children's Health Operations Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services

CHERRY STREET HEALTH SERVICES CLAIMED UNALLOWABLE COSTS UNDER RECOVERY ACT GRANTS

MEDICARE PART D E-PRESCRIBING STANDARDS: EARLY ASSESSMENT SHOWS PARTIAL CONNECTIVITY

MEDICARE DRUG INTEGRITY CONTRACTORS IDENTIFICATION

Transcription:

Report Number: A-05-08-00040 DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES OFFICE OF AUDIT SERVICES 233 NORTH MICHIGAN AVENUE REGION V OFFICE OF CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 60601 INSPECTOR GENERAL August 4, 2008 Mr. Jason Helgerson Administrator Wisconsin Department of Health and Family Services 1 West Wilson Street P.O. Box 309 Madison, Wisconsin 53701-0309 Dear Mr. Helgerson: Enclosed is the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), Office ofinspector General (OIG), final report entitled "Review of Wisconsin's Non-Emergency Medical Transportation Costs for Services Provided by American United Taxicab, Inc. for January 1 Through December 31, 2005." We will forward a copy of this report to the HHS action official noted on the following page for review and any action deemed necessary. The HHS action official will make final determination as to actions taken on all matters reported. We request that you respond to this official within 30 days from the date ofthis letter. Your response should present any comments or additional information that you believe may have a bearing on the final determination. Pursuant to the principles ofthe Freedom ofinformation Act, 5 U.S.C. 552, as amended by Public Law 104-231, DIG reports generally are made available to the public to the extent the information is not subject to exemptions in the Act (45 CFR part 5). Accordingly, this report will be posted on the Internet at http://oig.hhs.gov. If you have any questions or comments about this report, please do not hesitate to call me, or contact Dave Markulin, Audit Manager, at (312) 353-1644 or through e-mail at David.Markulin@oig.hhs.gov. Please refer to report number A-05-08-00040 in all correspondence. Sincerely, ~~ Regional Inspector General for Audit Services Enclosure

Direct Reply to HHS Action Official: Ms. Jackie Garner Consortium Administrator Consortium for Medicaid and Children's Health Operations Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services 233 North Michigan Avenue, Suite 600 Chicago, Illinois 60601

Department of Health and Human Services OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL REVIEW OF WISCONSIN'S NON EMERGENCY MEDICAL TRANSPORTATION COSTS FOR SERVICES PROVIDED BY AMERICAN UNITED TAXICAB, INC. FOR JANUARY 1 THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 2005 Daniel R. Levinson Inspector General August 2008 A-05-08-00040

Office ofinspector General http://oig.hhs.gov The mission ofthe Office of Inspector General (OIG), as mandated by Public Law 95-452, as amended, is to protect the integrity of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) programs, as well as the health and welfare of beneficiaries served by those programs. This statutory mission is carried out through a nationwide network of audits, investigations, and inspections conducted by the following operating components: Office ofaudit Services The Office of Audit Services (OAS) provides auditing services for HHS, either by conducting audits with its own audit resources or by overseeing audit work done by others. Audits examine the performance of HHS programs and/or its grantees and contractors in carrying out their respective responsibilities and are intended to provide independent assessments of HHS programs and operations. These assessments help reduce waste, abuse, and mismanagement and promote economy and efficiency throughout HHS. Office ofevaluation and Inspections The Office of Evaluation and Inspections (OEl) conducts national evaluations to provide HHS, Congress, and the public with timely, useful, and reliable information on significant issues. These evaluations focus on preventing fraud, waste, or abuse and promoting economy, efficiency, and effectiveness of departmental programs. To promote impact, OEl reports also present practical recommendations for improving program operations. Office ofinvestigations The Office ofinvestigations (01) conducts criminal, civil, and administrative investigations of fraud and misconduct related to HHS programs, operations, and beneficiaries. With investigators working in all 50 States and the District of Columbia, 01 utilizes its resources by actively coordinating with the Department of Justice and other Federal, State, and local law enforcement authorities. The investigative efforts of 01 often lead to criminal convictions, administrative sanctions, and/or civil monetary penalties. Office ofcounsel to the Inspector General The Office of Counsel to the Inspector General (OCIG) provides general legal services to OIG, rendering advice and opinions on HHS programs and operations and providing all legal support for OIG's internal operations. OCIG represents OIG in all civil and administrative fraud and abuse cases involving HHS programs, including False Claims Act, program exclusion, and civil monetary penalty cases. In connection with these cases, OCIG also negotiates and monitors corporate integrity agreements. OCIG renders advisory opinions, issues compliance program guidance, publishes fraud alerts, and provides other guidance to the health care industry concerning the anti-kickback statute and other OIG enforcement authorities.

Notices THIS REPORT IS AVAILABLE TO THE PUBLIC at http://oig.hhs.gov Pursuant to the principles of the Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. 552, as amended by Public Law 104-231, Office of Inspector General reports generally are made available to the public to the extent the information is not subject to exemptions in the Act (45 CFR part 5). OFFICE OF AUDIT SERVICES FINDINGS AND OPINIONS The designation of financial or management practices as questionable, a recommendation for the disallowance of costs incurred or claimed, and any other conclusions and recommendations in this report represent the findings and opinions of OAS. Authorized officials of the HHS operating divisions will make final determination on these matters.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY BACKGROUND Pursuant to Title XIX of the Social Security Act (the Act), the Medicaid program provides medical assistance to low-income individuals and individuals with disabilities. The Federal and State governments jointly fund and administer the Medicaid program. At the Federal level, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) administers the program. Each State administers its Medicaid program in accordance with a CMS-approved State plan. Although the State has considerable flexibility in designing and operating its Medicaid program, it must comply with applicable Federal requirements. Federal regulations (42 CFR 431.53) require each State to ensure that Medicaid beneficiaries have necessary transportation to and from medical providers and to describe the methods that the State will use to meet this requirement in its State plan. Pursuant to 42 CFR 440.170, transportation includes transportation expenses and other related travel expenses deemed necessary by the State agency to secure medical examinations and treatment for a beneficiary. The Wisconsin Department of Health and Family Services (the State agency) administers the State s Medicaid program. Pursuant to Wisconsin Statute 46.034(3), the State s common carrier Non-Emergency Medical Transportation (NEMT) program is administered by the State s 72 counties. Milwaukee County provides NEMT services to Medicaid-eligible beneficiaries through agreements with Wisconsin Medicaid health maintenance organizations (HMOs). The agreements require the HMOs to provide their beneficiaries with NEMT services to and from Medicaid-covered services. The HMOs must pre-authorize the NEMT services, coordinate the services with private transportation companies, and claim reimbursement from Milwaukee County for NEMT service costs. Milwaukee County claims reimbursement from the State agency, which claims Federal reimbursement by reporting NEMT service costs on the Form CMS-64, Quarterly Medicaid Statement of Expenditures for the Medical Assistance Program. American United Taxicab, Inc. (American) is a taxicab company, located in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, that provides dispatch service to taxicabs in Milwaukee County. During January 1 through December 31, 2005, American was the largest common carrier NEMT service provider in Milwaukee County. The State agency claimed Medicaid reimbursement totaling $6,345,003 ($3,172,502 Federal share) for NEMT services provided by American from January 1 through December 31, 2005. OBJECTIVE Our objective was to determine whether the State agency claimed Medicaid reimbursement for NEMT services provided by American in accordance with Federal and State requirements. SUMMARY OF FINDINGS The State agency claimed Medicaid reimbursement for NEMT services provided by American that did not always comply with Federal and State requirements. From a random sample of 100 i

claims totaling $1,483 for services provided by American, 18 claims totaling $295 were paid for NEMT services on dates when beneficiaries did not receive Medicaid-covered services. We identified two additional claims for which we were unable to contact the medical providers to verify that no Medicaid-covered service was provided on the date of the transportation service. For the remaining 80 sampled claims, NEMT services were provided and claimed on dates when beneficiaries received Medicaid-covered services. The State agency claimed reimbursement based on the costs reported by the HMOs and Milwaukee County. However, Milwaukee County s and the HMOs internal controls did not ensure that NEMT services were paid and claimed only on dates when beneficiaries received Medicaid-covered services for the 18 claims. As a result, for the period January 1 through December 31, 2005, we estimate that the State agency claimed $694,066 ($347,033 Federal share) for NEMT services provided by American on dates when beneficiaries did not receive Medicaid-covered services. RECOMMENDATIONS We recommend that the State agency: refund $347,033 to the Federal Government for the unallowable NEMT costs claimed when the beneficiaries did not receive Medicaid-covered services and work with the HMOs to implement internal controls to ensure that NEMT services are claimed only on dates when beneficiaries receive Medicaid-covered services. STATE AGENCY COMMENTS In written comments to our draft report, the State Agency agreed with the recommendations. The State Agency comments are included in their entirety as Appendix B. ii

TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION...1 Page BACKGROUND...1 Medicaid Program and Non-Emergency Medical Transportation Program...1 Wisconsin Non-Emergency Medical Transportation Program...1 Non-Emergency Medical Transportation Program in Milwaukee County...1 American United Taxicab, Inc...2 OBJECTIVE, SCOPE, AND METHODOLOGY...2 Objective...2 Scope...2 Methodology...2 FINDING AND RECOMMENDATIONS...4 CLAIMS FOR NON-EMERGENCY TRANSPORTATION SERVICE WITHOUT A MEDICAID-COVERED SERVICE...4 Federal, State, Milwaukee County, and HMO Requirements...4 Medicaid-Covered Services Not Provided...5 Milwaukee County and Health Maintenance Organizations Controls...5 RECOMMENDATIONS...6 STATE AGENCY COMMENTS...6 APPENDIXES A SAMPLE DESIGN AND METHODOLOGY B STATE AGENCY COMMENTS iii

INTRODUCTION BACKGROUND Medicaid Program and Non-Emergency Medical Transportation Program Pursuant to Title XIX of the Social Security Act (the Act), the Medicaid program provides medical assistance to low-income individuals and individuals with disabilities. The Federal and State Governments jointly fund and administer the Medicaid program. At the Federal level, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) administers the program. Each State administers its Medicaid program in accordance with a CMS-approved State plan. Although the State has considerable flexibility in designing and operating its Medicaid program, it must comply with applicable Federal requirements. Federal regulations (42 CFR 431.53) require each State to ensure that Medicaid beneficiaries have necessary transportation to and from medical providers and to describe the methods that the State will use to meet this requirement in its State plan. Pursuant to 42 CFR 440.170, transportation includes transportation expenses and other related travel expenses deemed necessary by the State agency to secure medical examinations and treatment for a beneficiary. 1 Wisconsin Non-Emergency Medical Transportation Program The Wisconsin Department of Health and Family Services (the State agency) administers the State s Medicaid program. In accordance with the CMS approved State plan, the Wisconsin Non-Emergency Medical Transportation (NEMT) program provides transportation services for beneficiaries to receive Medicaid-covered services. The State plan, Attachment 3.1-D, states that medical assistance administrative payments may be made for common carrier transportation to obtain medical services. Transportation costs may be reimbursed only to and from a location where the beneficiary receives a Medicaid-covered service. Pursuant to Wisconsin Statute 46.034(3), the State s common carrier NEMT program is administered by the State s 72 counties. NEMT services require advance authorization by the appropriate county department of social services or other designated agent prior to the medical transportation. In Milwaukee County, the Wisconsin Medicaid health maintenance organizations (HMOs) are the designated agents that pre-authorize the NEMT services. Non-Emergency Medical Transportation in Milwaukee County Milwaukee County provides NEMT services to Medicaid-eligible beneficiaries through agreements with HMOs. The agreements require the HMOs to provide their beneficiaries with NEMT services to and from Medicaid-covered services. The HMOs pre-authorize the NEMT services, coordinate the services with private transportation companies, and claim reimbursement 1 Federal financial participation (FFP) is available when the State agency directly reimburses a transportation provider for NEMT services. If other arrangements are made to assure transportation, FFP is available as an administrative cost. Common carrier NEMT services are administrative costs in Wisconsin. 1

from Milwaukee County for NEMT service costs. Milwaukee County claims reimbursement from the State agency, which claims Federal reimbursement by reporting NEMT service costs on the Form CMS-64, Quarterly Medicaid Statement of Expenditures for the Medical Assistance Program. American United Taxicab, Inc. American United Taxicab, Inc. (American) is a taxicab company, located in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, that provides dispatch service to taxicabs in Milwaukee County. American had agreements with five HMOs 2 in Milwaukee County to provide NEMT services to Medicaid beneficiaries. During January 1 through December 31, 2005, American was the largest common carrier NEMT service provider in Milwaukee County. OBJECTIVE, SCOPE, AND METHODOLOGY Objective Our objective was to determine whether the State agency claimed Medicaid reimbursement for NEMT services provided by American in accordance with Federal and State requirements. Scope We reviewed NEMT service costs totaling $6,345,003 ($3,172,502 Federal share) that the State agency claimed for services provided by American from January 1 through December 31, 2005. From the universe of 397,969 NEMT claims, we selected and reviewed a random sample of 100 claims with payments totaling $1,483. Our review of internal controls was limited to understanding the HMOs pre-authorization and scheduling of NEMT services, the taxicab driver s procedures and documentation, and the billing, claiming, and reimbursement procedures for American, the five HMOs, Milwaukee County, and the State agency. We conducted fieldwork at the State agency in Madison, Wisconsin, and at Milwaukee County and American in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. Methodology To accomplish our objective, we: reviewed applicable Federal and State laws, regulations, and other requirements related to Medicaid NEMT services; 2 American provided transportation services to Medicaid beneficiaries of five HMOs: Abri Health Plan, Inc., Independent Care Health Plan, Managed Health Services, Network Health Plan, and United Health Care of Wisconsin, Inc., in 2005. 2

reviewed Wisconsin laws and Milwaukee city requirements related to taxi and driver licensing; reviewed the HMOs agreements with Milwaukee County and American; interviewed State agency, Milwaukee County, HMO, and American staff regarding processing claims and reporting costs for NEMT services; reconciled the State agency s claim for NEMT services for the quarter ended June 30, 2005, on the Form CMS-64 to supporting documentation; interviewed American officials regarding policies and procedures used to record NEMT services in their system, dispatch taxis, audit the trip vouchers, pay the drivers, and claim reimbursement from the HMOs; and selected a random sample of 100 claims paid to American for NEMT services provided during January 1 through December 31, 2005. For each of the 100 sampled claims, we determined whether the claim met Federal, State and local requirements for Medicaid reimbursement. Specifically, we: reviewed the Medicaid eligibility of each of the beneficiaries; reviewed American s documentation regarding the beneficiary, origination and destination addresses, authorization from the HMO, and the driver and vehicle utilized; reviewed American receipts to ensure they were in accordance with rates established in Chapter 100-52 of the City of Milwaukee Public Passenger Vehicle Regulations; reviewed American s records of the drivers public passenger licenses to determine if the driver was properly licensed; reviewed Milwaukee Department of Licensing records to determine if the vehicle had a current permit at the time of the transportation service; analyzed the CMS Medicaid Statistical Information System (MSIS) to determine if the beneficiary obtained a Medicaid-covered medical service on the date of the transportation service; requested documentation from Medicaid providers for those beneficiaries that did not have a Medicaid-covered service provided (documented in the MSIS) on the date of the transportation service and if no service was provided, obtained a signed confirmation that the beneficiaries did not receive a medical service on the date; 3

quantified the number of claims paid for NEMT services on dates when beneficiaries did not receive Medicaid-covered services; and estimated the total dollars that the State agency claimed reimbursement for NEMT services when beneficiaries did not receive Medicaid-covered services. (See Appendix A) We conducted this performance audit in accordance with generally accepted government auditing standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain sufficient, appropriate evidence to provide a reasonable basis for our findings and conclusions based on our audit objectives. We believe that the evidence obtained provides a reasonable basis for our findings and conclusions based on our audit objective. FINDING AND RECOMMENDATIONS The State agency claimed Medicaid reimbursement for NEMT services provided by American that did not always comply with Federal and State requirements. From a random sample of 100 claims totaling $1,483 for services provided by American, 18 claims totaling $295 were paid for NEMT services on dates when beneficiaries did not receive Medicaid-covered services. We identified two additional claims for which we were unable to contact the medical providers to verify that no Medicaid-covered service was provided on the date of the transportation service. For the remaining 80 sampled claims, NEMT services were provided and claimed on dates when beneficiaries received Medicaid-covered services. The State agency claimed reimbursement based on the costs reported by the HMOs and Milwaukee County. However, Milwaukee County s and the HMOs internal controls did not ensure that NEMT services were paid and claimed only on dates when beneficiaries received Medicaid-covered services for the 18 claims. As a result, for the period January 1 through December 31, 2005, we estimate that the State agency claimed $694,066 ($347,033 Federal share) for NEMT services provided by American on dates when beneficiaries did not receive Medicaid-covered services. CLAIMS FOR NON-EMERGENCY TRANSPORTATION SERVICE WITHOUT A MEDICAID-COVERED SERVICE We estimate that the State agency claimed $694,066 ($347,033 Federal share) for NEMT services provided by American on dates when a beneficiary did not receive Medicaid-covered services. Federal, State, Milwaukee County, and HMO Requirements Federal regulation 42 CFR 440.170 states that transportation includes transportation expenses and other related travel expenses deemed necessary by the State agency to secure medical examinations and treatment for a beneficiary. 4

The Wisconsin Medicaid State Plan, Attachment 3.1-D, states that payment may be made for transportation by common carrier to obtain medical services. Such payment requires advance authorization prior to the medical transportation. In the agreements with Milwaukee County, the HMOs agree to provide common carrier transportation for their Medicaid beneficiaries. Transportation services are limited to transportation of Medicaid beneficiaries to and from Medicaid-covered services only. Medicaid-Covered Services Not Provided The State agency claimed reimbursement for 20 claims totaling $335 for NEMT services on dates when beneficiaries did not receive Medicaid-covered services or we were unable to verify that Medicaid-covered services were provided. For the 18 claims totaling $295, the HMOs did not maintain documentation that the beneficiary received a Medicaid-covered service on the NEMT service date. For 17 of 18 claims, the Medicaid providers identified by the HMOs could not provide medical records or other documentation to support that a beneficiary received a medical service. For the remaining claim, the NEMT service was provided for a Social Security disability determination appointment, 3 which was not a Medicaidcovered service. For 2 claims totaling $40, the HMOs did not maintain documentation that the beneficiary received a Medicaid-covered service on the NEMT service date. We were unable to contact the medical providers 4 to verify that no Medicaid-covered services were provided on the NEMT service date for the 2 claims. 5 Milwaukee County and Health Maintenance Organizations Controls The State agency claimed reimbursement for the 18 claims based on costs reported by Milwaukee County and the HMOs. However, Milwaukee County s and the HMOs internal controls did not ensure NEMT services were paid and claimed only on dates when beneficiaries received Medicaid-covered services. 3 The Social Security Administration reimbursed the beneficiary for mileage for the transportation to and from the appointment. 4 The HMO could not identify the medical provider or the provider was no longer in business. 5 We did not question the NEMT services and did not include them in our estimation. 5

RECOMMENDATIONS We recommend that the State agency: refund $347,033 to the Federal Government for the unallowable NEMT costs claimed when the beneficiaries did not receive Medicaid-covered services and work with the HMOs to implement internal controls to ensure that NEMT services are claimed only on dates when beneficiaries receive Medicaid-covered services. STATE AGENCY COMMENTS In written comments to our draft report, the State Agency agreed with the recommendations. The State Agency comments are included in their entirety as Appendix B. 6

APPENDIXES

APPENDIX A Page 1 of 2 SAMPLE DESIGN AND METHODOLOGY AUDIT OBJECTIVE The objective of our audit was to determine whether the State agency claimed Medicaid reimbursement for NEMT services provided by American in accordance with Federal and State requirements. AUDIT UNIVERSE The universe consisted of all Medicaid paid NEMT claims for services provided by American to Medicaid beneficiaries for five health maintenance organizations (HMOs) in Milwaukee County from January 1 through December 31, 2005. SAMPLING FRAME The sampling frame was a computer file containing 397,969 Medicaid paid NEMT claims for services rendered by American, from January 1 through December 31, 2005. The 397,969 claims totaled $6,345,003 ($3,172,502 Federal share). SAMPLE UNIT The sampling unit was an individual Medicaid paid NEMT claim for service rendered by American during the audit period. SAMPLE DESIGN We used a simple random sample. SAMPLE SIZE We selected a sample size of 100 Medicaid paid NEMT claims for services. SOURCE OF RANDOM NUMBERS The source of the random numbers for selecting sample items is the Office of Audit Services statistical software, RAT-STATS 2007, version 2. We used the random number generator for our simple random sample.

APPENDIX A Page 2 of 2 METHOD OF SELECTING SAMPLE ITEMS We sequentially numbered the Medicaid NEMT claims for services in our sampling frame and selected the sequential numbers that correlated to the random numbers. We then created a list of 100 sampled items. CHARACTERISTICS TO BE MEASURED We based our determination as to whether a sampled Medicaid NEMT claim for service was proper on applicable Federal and State requirements and a review of documentation obtained from American, Medicaid providers, and the HMOs. If the beneficiary did not receive a Medicaid-covered service on the transportation date of service, the NEMT claim for service was considered improper. For Medicaid providers that we were unable to contact, we did not question the associated NEMT services and did not include them in our estimation. ESTIMATION METHODOLOGY We used RAT-STATS to calculate the estimated overpayments associated with any unallowable NEMT claims for services reimbursed by Medicaid. SAMPLE RESULTS AND ESTIMATES Overall Sample Results and Estimates NEMT Services in Universe Value of Universe Sample Size Value of Sampled Services Number of Services in Error Unallowable Federal Funding for Sampled Services 397,969 $6,345,003 100 $1,483 18 $295 Limits Calculated for a 90% Confidence Interval Estimated Value of Improper Services Claimed Point estimate $1,174,009 Lower limit $694,066 Upper limit $1,653,951

APPENDIXB DIVISION OF HEALTH CARE ACCESS AND ACCOUNTABILITY 1 WEST WILSON STREET POBOX309 MADISON WI 5370H)309 Jim Doyle Governor Telephone: 608-266-8922 State of Wisconsin FAX: 608-266-1096 Karen E. Timberlake TTY: 888~92-1402 Secretary Department of Health Services dhfs.wisconsin.gov July 23,2008 Mr. Marc Gustafson Regional Inspector General for Audit Services Office ofaudit Services Department ofhealth and Human Services 233 North Michigan Avenue Chicago,IL 60601 RE: Report Number: A-OS-08-00040... Dear Mr. Gustafson: Thank you for having your staffreview Wisconsin's non-emergency medical transportation program. I have had an opportunity to review the U.S. Department ofhealth and Human Services Office ofinspector General's draft report entitled "Review ofwisconsin's Non Emergency Medical Transportation Costs for Services Provided by American United Taxicab, Inc. for January 1 Through December 31, 2005." The WisconsinDepartment ofhealth Services concurs with the recommendations made bythe OIG in its draft report; however, we reserve the right fordhs, Milwaukee County, or the managed care organizations to examine the claims in question and conduct independent analysis ofthe fmdings. Department staffare currently working with our HMOs to implement controls to ensure that all future NEMT services are claimed only on appropriate dates when Medicaidcovered services have been received. Again, we appreciate OIG's review ofour NEMT program and look forward to working with you to ensure that our transportation program operates in the most efficient and effective manner. Sincerely, J:~e~ Medicaid Director JAH:jmc BP07022 cc: Dave Marulin, Audit Manager Wisconsin.gov