DAFTAR PUSTAKA Bethel, S.M. (990), Making the Difference: Twelve Qualities That Make You a Leader, Berkley Publishing Group, ew York, Y. Bohn, J.G. and Grafton, D. (2002), The relationship of perceived leadership behaviors to organizational efficacy, Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, Vol. 9 o. 2, pp. 65-79. Buchanan D. & Huczynski, A, 997, Organizational Behaviour, 3rd edition, Prentice Hall Chang, Su Chao., Lee, Ming Shing (2007). A Study on relationship among leadership, organizational culture, the operation of learning organization and employee s job satisfaction. The Learning Organization. Vol.4 o.2, pp.55-85 Daft, R.L. (200), Organisation Theory and Design, South-Western College Publishing, Cincinatti, OH,. Davis K, ewstrom JW, 2002. Perilaku dalam Organisasi. Jilid, Terjemahan. Jakarta: Penerbit Erlangga Gibson, L., J.M. Ivancevich, dan J.H. Donnely. 2000. Organizations, Behavior, Structure Processes, International Edition. McGraw-Hill Companies, ew York. Greenberg, J., Lind, E.A. (2000), "The pursuit of organizational justice: from onceptualization to implication to application", in Cooper, C.L., Locke, E.W. (Eds),Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Blackwell Press, Malden, MA,. Handoko, T. Hani (200). Manajemen Personalia dan Sumber Daya Manusia. Edisi Kedua. Yogyakarta : Penerbit BPFE Huang, I.C. and Wu, J.M. (2000), The corporate culture and its effect on organizacional commitment and job satisfaction in public sector: an example of the Taiwan Tobacco andliquor Monopoly Bureau, Review of Public-Owned Enterprises, Vol. 2 o., pp. 25-46. Kreitner, R., and A. Kinicki. (200). Organizational Behavior. Fifth Ed. Irwin McGraw- Hill. Boston Liu, A.M.M., Fellow, R.F. and Fang, Z. (2003), The power paradigm of project leadership, Construction Management and Economics, Vol. 2 o. 8, pp. 89-29 Luthans, Fred, (2002). Organization behavior. Englewood Cliff, ew Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc McKinnon, J.L., Harrison, G.I., Chow, C.W. and Wu, A. (2003), Organizational culture: association with commitment, job satisfaction, propensity to remain, and information sharing in Taiwan, International Journal of Business Studies, Vol. o., pp. 25-44.
ewstrom dan Davis, (2002). Organizational Behavior, International Edition (ew York: The McGraw Hill Companies Panggabean, Mutiara S. (2004). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Jakarta :Ghalia Robbins, Stephen P., (2007), Organizational Behavior, ew Jersey: Pearson Education International. Seashore, S.E. and Taber, T.D. (975), Job satisfaction and their correlations, American Behavior and Scientists, Vol. 8 o. 2, pp. 346-56. Schein, E.H. (990), Organizational culture, American Psychologist, Vol. 45, pp. 09-9. 2
Correlations KP KP2 KP3 KP4 KP5 KP6 KP7 KP8 KP9 KP0 KP Kepemimpinan Transformasiona *. Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (-tailed). **. Correlation is significant at the 0.0 level (-tailed). Correlations Kepemim pinan Transfor KP KP2 KP3 KP4 KP5 KP6 KP7 KP8 KP9 KP0 KP masional,39*,473**,243,97,64,520**,99,378** -,06,927**,726**,026,00,07,8,62,000,5,00,46,000,000,39* -,02,274*,366*,29,24,225,6,288*,309*,498**,026,472,048,02,220,072,087,66,040,029,00,473** -,02,297*,48 -,006,342*,43**,673**,050,426**,63**,00,472,035,87,487,08,005,000,382,004,000,243,274*,297*,30*,87,25,00,89 -,023,86,45**,07,048,035,033,30,097,275,28,445,32,002,97,366*,48,30*,399**,458**,475**,324*,76,44,594**,8,02,87,033,007,002,00,024,45,94,000,64,29 -,006,87,399**,229,464** -,00,27,72,426**,62,220,487,30,007,084,002,476,224,5,004,520**,24,342*,25,458**,229,504**,427**,070,529**,725**,000,072,08,097,002,084,00,004,337,000,000,99,225,43**,00,475**,464**,504**,433**,206,53,649**,5,087,005,275,00,002,00,003,08,80,000,378**,6,673**,89,324* -,00,427**,433**,480**,372*,690**,00,66,000,28,024,476,004,003,00,0,000 -,06,288*,050 -,023,76,27,070,206,480** -,04,37*,46,040,382,445,45,224,337,08,00,467,026,927**,309*,426**,86,44,72,529**,53,372* -,04,696**,000,029,004,32,94,5,000,80,0,467,000,726**,498**,63**,45**,594**,426**,725**,649**,690**,37*,696**,000,00,000,002,000,004,000,000,000,026,000 3
Correlations KK KK2 KK3 KK4 KK5 KK6 KK7 KK8 KK9 KK0 Kinerja *. Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (-tailed). **. Correlation is significant at the 0.0 level (-tailed). Correlations KK KK2 KK3 KK4 KK5 KK6 KK7 KK8 KK9 KK0 Kinerja,39*,473**,243,97,64,520**,99,378** -,06,63**,026,00,07,8,62,000,5,00,46,000,39* -,02,274*,366*,29,24,225,6,288*,500**,026,472,048,02,220,072,087,66,040,00,473** -,02,297*,48 -,006,342*,43**,673**,050,606**,00,472,035,87,487,08,005,000,382,000,243,274*,297*,30*,87,25,00,89 -,023,473**,07,048,035,033,30,097,275,28,445,00,97,366*,48,30*,399**,458**,475**,324*,76,643**,8,02,87,033,007,002,00,024,45,000,64,29 -,006,87,399**,229,464** -,00,27,447**,62,220,487,30,007,084,002,476,224,002,520**,24,342*,25,458**,229,504**,427**,070,72**,000,072,08,097,002,084,00,004,337,000,99,225,43**,00,475**,464**,504**,433**,206,703**,5,087,005,275,00,002,00,003,08,000,378**,6,673**,89,324* -,00,427**,433**,480**,705**,00,66,000,28,024,476,004,003,00,000 -,06,288*,050 -,023,76,27,070,206,480**,362*,46,040,382,445,45,224,337,08,00,03,63**,500**,606**,473**,643**,447**,72**,703**,705**,362*,000,00,000,00,000,002,000,000,000,03 4
Reliability Scale: ALL VARIABLES Cases Case Processing Summary Excluded a a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in the procedure. % 38 00,0 0,0 38 00,0 Reliability Statistics Cronbach's Alpha of Items,83 Reliability Scale: ALL VARIABLES Cases Case Processing Summary Excluded a a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in the procedure. % 38 00,0 0,0 38 00,0 Reliability Statistics Cronbach's Alpha of Items,786 0 5
Frequency Table Laki-laki Perempuan Gender Frequency Percent Percent Percent 26 68,4 68,4 68,4 2 3,6 3,6 00,0 2-30 tahun 3-40 tahun Usia Frequency Percent Percent Percent 26 68,4 68,4 68,4 2 3,6 3,6 00,0 Pendidikan Diploma (D/D2/D3) Sarjana (S) Pascasarjana (s2/s3) Frequency Percent Percent Percent 4 0,5 0,5 0,5 28 73,7 73,7 84,2 6 5,8 5,8 00,0 Lama Bekerja 3 bln - thn 2 thn - 5 thn 5 thn - 0 thn Diatas 0 thn Frequency Percent Percent Percent 8 2, 2, 2, 20 52,6 52,6 73,7 2 5,3 5,3 78,9 8 2, 2, 00,0 Penghasilan Rp 2 Juta - Rp 4 Juta Rp 4 Juta - Rp 6 Juta Diatas Rp 6 Juta Frequency Percent Percent Percent 4 36,8 36,8 36,8 8 47,4 47,4 84,2 6 5,8 5,8 00,0 6
Descriptives Descriptive Statistics KP KP2 KP3 KP4 KP5 KP6 KP7 KP8 KP9 KP0 KP Kepemimpinan Transformasional (listwise) Minimum Maximum Mean Std. Deviation 38,00 5,00 3,7368,00497 38,00 5,00 3,9737,8256 38 2,00 5,00 3,705,80229 38 2,00 5,00 3,842,82286 38 2,00 5,00 3,92,722 38 2,00 5,00 4,0789,78436 38 2,00 5,00 3,6579,9087 38,00 5,00 3,842,0007 38,00 5,00 3,7632,97077 38 2,00 5,00 4,2632,6009 38,00 5,00 3,636,02459 38 2,27 4,64 3,8565,5279 38 Descriptives Descriptive Statistics KK KK2 KK3 KK4 KK5 KK6 KK7 KK8 KK9 KK0 Kinerja (listwise) Minimum Maximum Mean Std. Deviation 38,00 5,00 3,7368,00497 38,00 5,00 3,9737,8256 38 2,00 5,00 3,705,80229 38 2,00 5,00 3,842,82286 38 2,00 5,00 3,92,722 38 2,00 5,00 4,0789,78436 38 2,00 5,00 3,6579,9087 38,00 5,00 3,842,0007 38,00 5,00 3,7632,97077 38 2,00 5,00 4,2632,6009 38 2,40 4,60 3,8789,4989 38 7
Regression Model Variables Entered/Removed b Variables Variables Entered Removed Method Kepemimp inan. Enter Transform asional a a. All requested variables entered. b. Dependent Variable: Kinerja Model Model Summary Adjusted Std. Error of R R Square R Square the Estimate,989 a,978,978,74555 a. Predictors: (Constant), Kepemimpinan Transformasional Model Regression Residual AOVA b Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. 898,305 898,305 66,093,000 a 20,0 36,556 98,36 37 a. Predictors: (Constant), Kepemimpinan Transformasional b. Dependent Variable: Kinerja Model (Constant) Kepemimpinan Transformasional a. Dependent Variable: Kinerja Coefficients a Unstandardized Coefficients Standardized Coefficients B Std. Error Beta t Sig.,734,930,865,070,874,022,989 40,20,000 8