Periodic Benefit Risk Evaluation Report (PBRER) PIPA Conference Nov 7, 2014 Joerg Seebeck, MD

Similar documents
E2C(R2) Implementation Working Group ICH E2C(R2) Guideline: Periodic Benefit-Risk Evaluation Report Questions & Answers

ICH guideline E2C (R2) on periodic benefit-risk evaluation report (PBRER)

INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON HARMONISATION OF TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS FOR REGISTRATION OF PHARMACEUTICALS FOR HUMAN USE E2C(R2)

Guideline on good pharmacovigilance practices (GVP)

ICH guideline E2C (R2) Periodic benefit-risk evaluation report (PBRER)

Questions and Answers to the Annual Safety Report

Guidance notes. for Patient Safety and Pharmacovigilance in Patient Support Programmes

Post-authorisation safety studies and the EU PAS Register

EphMRA Adverse Event Reporting Guidelines 2013

How To Write A Dsur

Guideline on good pharmacovigilance practices (GVP)

Guideline on good pharmacovigilance practices (GVP)

Detailed guidance AEs reporting in clinical trials ( CT-3 ) Stefano Bonato, M.D. Pharmacovigilance Country Head Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals

MedDRA in pharmacovigilance industry perspective

EphMRA Adverse Event Reporting Guidelines 2015

EUROPEAN MEDICINES PRACTICES AND TOOLS AGENCY DRUG SAFETY

Stakeholder Meeting, 7 th June 2013 An inspector s perspective considerations for patient support and reimbursement programmes

Guidance for Industry

Risk management plans an overview

Guideline on good pharmacovigilance practices (GVP)

Agence fédérale des médicaments et des produits de santé

Guidance notes on collection of drug safety information by employees and agents of pharmaceutical companies

Good practice guide on recording, coding, reporting and assessment of medication errors

Questions & answers on signal management

Risk Management Plan (RMP) Guidance (Draft)

Guideline on good pharmacovigilance practices (GVP)

Clinical trials: from European perspective to National implementation. CTFG / FAMHP / pharma.be. Brussels, 19 November 2010

Guidance notes on the management of adverse events and product complaints from digital media

Overview of Risk Management

Guideline on good pharmacovigilance practices (GVP)

Workshop on Patient Support and Market Research Programmes

Risk Management in the Pharmaceutical Industry. Elena Apetri, Global Medical Safety Surveillance Schering AG

COMMITTEE FOR VETERINARY MEDICINAL PRODUCTS GUIDELINE FOR THE CONDUCT OF POST-MARKETING SURVEILLANCE STUDIES OF VETERINARY MEDICINAL PRODUCTS

COMMITTEE FOR MEDICINAL PRODUCTS FOR HUMAN USE (CHMP) DRAFT. Guideline on Risk Management Systems for Medicinal Products for Human Use

Guideline on good pharmacovigilance practices (GVP)

Pharmacovigilance System Master File (PSMF), QPPV and audits

Risk Management Plan for Drug Establishments

BEST PRACTICE GUIDE for Handling of Periodic Safety Update Reports

INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON HARMONISATION OF TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS FOR REGISTRATION OF PHARMACEUTICALS FOR HUMAN USE. Current Step 4 version

COMMITTEE FOR MEDICINAL PRODUCTS FOR HUMAN USE (CHMP) GUIDELINE ON RISK MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS FOR MEDICINAL PRODUCTS FOR HUMAN USE

Preparation of a Meaningful and Appropriate Risk Management Plan a Multifunctional Task. Wissenschaftliche Prüfungsarbeit. zur Erlangung des Titels

Guideline on good pharmacovigilance practices (GVP)

Electronic exchanges of individual case safety reports (ICSRs) with ANSM (National Agency of Medicine and Health Product safety)

Monitoring of medical literature and the entry of relevant information into the EudraVigilance database by the European Medicines Agency

MedDRA in clinical trials industry perspective

LEBANESE MINISTRY OF HEALTH DIRECTIVE

Guideline on good pharmacovigilance practices (GVP)

EMEA RM DRAFT GUIDANCE ISPE RESPONSE 1

Questions and answers on preparation, management and assessment of periodic safety update reports (PSURs)

Key considerations for outsourcing late phase clinical research

Risk Management Plan - Bayer Experience :

Guide to Clinical Trial Applications

Good practice guide on recording, coding, reporting and assessment of medication errors

EU PAS Register Guide

Guideline on good pharmacovigilance practices (GVP)

PHV- 4 version 1 ELECTRONIC ADVERSE DRUG REACTION REPORTING

The information contained in these slides is for general purposes only and presents the state of knowledge at November 30, 2011

Summary of the risk management plan (RMP) for Cerdelga (eliglustat)

Seminario SSFA. New Guideline on Good Pharmacovigilance Practice (GVP) Fare clic per modificare lo stile del sottotitolo dello schema

The Product Review Life Cycle A Brief Overview

Causality Assessment in Practice Pharmaceutical Industry Perspective. Lachlan MacGregor Senior Safety Scientist F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd.

POST-APPROVAL SAFETY DATA MANAGEMENT: DEFINITIONS AND STANDARDS FOR EXPEDITED REPORTING E2D

Sheffield Kidney Institute. Planning a Clinical Trial

Use of MedDRA in CTCAE and in the Biopharmaceutical Industry

Guidance for Industry E2C Clinical Safety Data Management: Periodic Safety Update Reports for Marketed Drugs

GUIDELINE ON THE SUBMISSION OF RISK MANAGEMENT PLAN DOCUMENTS

Guideline on good pharmacovigilance practices (GVP)

Summary of the risk management plan (RMP) for Ionsys (fentanyl)

Clinical research: where are we with the new (Paediatric) RC trial Regulation

EU Clinical Trials Register. An agency of the European Union

Guideline on good pharmacovigilance practices (GVP)

Guidance for the format and content of the protocol of non-interventional post-authorisation safety studies

Memantine hydrochloride 20 mg film-coated tablets PL 17907/0291

Clinical Trials and Safety Surveillance of Drugs in Development

Risk Management Plan (RMP) on Biologicals and NCE

Guidance on format of the risk management plan (RMP) in the EU in integrated format

One-year report on human medicines pharmacovigilance tasks of the European Medicines Agency

Medicine Safety Glossary

Volume 2B Notice to Applicants. Medicinal products for human use. Presentation and format of the dossier. Common Technical Document (CTD)

ST. MICHAEL S HOSPITAL Guidelines for Reporting Serious Adverse Events / Unanticipated Problems to the SMH Research Ethics Board (REB) July 09, 2014

Regulatory approval routes in the European System for Medicinal Products

OECD Recommendation on the Governance of Clinical Trials

Public Assessment Report UKPAR. Levonorgestrel 1.5 mg tablet. (levonorgestrel). UK Licence No: PL 41947/0006. ELC Group s.r.o.

Appendix 3 INDIVIDUAL PATIENT DRUG TREATMENT. POLICY AND PROCESS FOR DECISION MAKING September 2007

COMMITTEE FOR MEDICINAL PRODUCTS FOR HUMAN USE (CHMP) GUIDELINE ON DATA MONITORING COMMITTEES

Levonorgestrel/Ethinylestradiol 150/30 Microgram Coated Tablets PL 20117/0044

The EU Clinical Trial Regulation A regulator s perspective

TRANSATLANTIC TRADE AND INVESTMENT PARTNERSHIP

Donepezil hydrochloride 10 mg film-coated tablets PL 19156/0130

Official Journal of the European Union. (Acts whose publication is obligatory)

The Trans-Tasman Early Warning System. Processes in Australia and New Zealand

The EMA current activities towards ISO IDMP implementation

Guideline for Industry

How To Understand The Paediatric Regulation

Reflection paper on non-spontaneous adverse event reports (peer-reviewed literature, internet and social media)

EudraVigilance stakeholder change management plan

EU DIRECTIVE ON GOOD CLINICAL PRACTICE IN CLINICAL TRIALS DH & MHRA BRIEFING NOTE

Montelukast 10mg film-coated tablets PL 17907/0474

RISK MANAGEMENT PLANNING AND MANDATED POST-AUTHORIZATION STUDIES

GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS FOR CLINICAL TRIALS E8

Transcription:

Periodic Benefit Risk Evaluation Report (PBRER) PIPA Conference Nov 7, 2014 Joerg Seebeck, MD

Aims of this presentation Concept of PBRER Content and form (selected topics)

REGULATORY BACKGROUND Based on ICH-E2C (R2), step 4 Nov 2012 Implementation in Europe via GVP module VII (revision 1, 9 Dec 2013) PBRER are referred to as PSUR EU relevant legislation Directive 2001/83 & 2010/84/EU Regulation 726 / 2004 & 520 / 2012

MAIN PURPOSE OF PSURs B R B R B R TIME B/R assessment at pre-defined intervals throughout the product life-cycle (or upon request)

MODULAR APPROACH MA Approval DSUR DSUR DSUR DMP RMP RMP RMP PSUR PSUR PSUR Common content: - See next slide

COMMON SECTION BETWEEN PSUR & RMP

PSUR A tool to report signals? Y Report via P-PV-emerging-safetyissue@ema.europa.eu Validated Signal ESI N Manage differently (Report in PSUR) PSUR not a tool for initial reporting of signals fulfilling ESI criteria PSUR is a tool to provide an update about the signalling status of a product (signals closed, ongoing) Also, the production of a PSUR can lead to the identification of signals (to be reported as ESI, if fulfilling ESI-criteria)

Severity of risk (a) B/R evaluation principles include Safety, efficacy, effectiveness data Missing data* (e.g. special populations) Consider all uses (authorized & non-authorized) Consider data back to the DIBD Risk Characteristics *Certainty / Uncertainty (about a & b) Frequency (b) (probability)

Principles for the preparation of PSURs 1 active substance per 1 PSUR (all pharmaceutical forms; exceptions possible) Where required, use summaries of case narratives (not the CIOMS I text) Include interval and cumulative data

Reference Information (Reference Product Information) Content: Core safety information + authorised indications in ICH countries (corresponds to important baseline efficacy and effectiveness information 17.1) Format CCDS CCSI When no CCSI or CCDS exists, an alternative RPI has to be specified: e.g. local SmPC

Reference Information Management 1. Perform SD (including review of labels) Common problems: RPI too narrow (core CCSI), Low number of listed events False positive signals 4. Use adjusted RPI for next review cycle 2. Update RPI RPI too wide (e.g. local SmPC) high number of listed events False negative signals* 3. Adjust local labels to RPI *E.g. disharmony of USPI vs EU-SmPC due to different document structures and implementation policies

Format and contents of the PSUR

Overview Part I: Title page including signature Part II: Executive Summary Part III: Table of contents 1. Introduction 2. Worldwide marketing authorisation status 3. Actions taken in the reporting interval for safety reasons 4. Changes to the reference safety information 5. Estimated exposure and use patterns 6. Data in summary tabulations 7. Summaries of significant findings from clinical trials during the reporting interval 8. Finding from non-interventional studies 9. Information from other clinical trials and sources 10. Non-clinical data 11. Literature 12. Other periodic reports 13. Lack of efficacy in controlled clinical trials 14. Late breaking information 15. Overview of signals (new, ongoing, closed) 16. Signal and risk evaluation 17. Benefit evaluation 18. Integrated benefit-risk analysis for authorised indications 19. Conclusions and actions 20. Appendices to the PSUR

Data in summary tabulations Spontaneous data Use event-level for seriousness Represent PT level and SOC Present cumulative and interval Include all sources (HCP, nhcp, lit, solicited) Note: listedness is not required but causality

Summary tabulations; Clinical Trial data (B.5.6.2); principles Discuss only (own) MA sponsored trials MA explain any omission of data Represent data cumulatively (separate presentation of interval data not required (but discuss emerging issues; see B.5.7) Tabulate investigational drug & comparator Option to organise data by trial, or program, or indication, or route of administration, or other criteria Show serious events not reactions; i.e. causality not required (do not show non-serious events) No unblinding of data required Add appendix listing all sponsored postauthorisation interventional trials

B.5.7 Subsection - Clinical Trial data (discuss for emerging issues) B.5.7.1 Completed clinical trials B.5.7.2 Ongoing clinical trials B.5.7.3 Long term follow-up (especially advanced therapy products) B.5.7.4 Other therapeutic use of medicinal product; based on protocols with solicited reporting as per ICH E2D e.g Expanded access programmes Compassionate use programmes Particular patient use Other organised data collections interventional

B.5.8 Findings from noninterventional studies Observational studies Epidemiological studies Registries Active surveillance programmes Drug utilisation studies ( RMP) Appendix: list all MA-sponsored noninterventional studies Noninterventional

B.5.9 Information from other clinical trials and sources 5.9.1 Other Clinical trials ; MAH has access to data but is not the sponsor E.g. meta-analysis of RCT Co-development partner Investigator initiated trials

B.5.11 Literature Lit ICSR Lit non-icsr Pregnancy outcomes (including termination) with no adverse outcomes Use in paediatric populations Compassionate supply, named patient use Lack of efficacy (see also section 5.13) Etc.

B.5.15 Overview of Signals: new, ongoing or closed Provide high level overview of signals Do not include not evaluated statistical signals New signal = signal identified during reporting interval Closed signal = signal evaluated not refuted, not ongoing; or refuted Ongoing signal = under evaluation during end of reporting interval

B.5.15 Overview of Signals: new, ongoing or closed Describe signal in tabular format (here or in appendix) Provide detailed assessment of closed signals under section 16.2 signal evaluation

B.5.15 Signal Summary Tabulation

B.5.16 Signal and risk evaluation Summary about what is known about important identified and potential risks and missing information ( RMP); 5.16.1 Old status Evaluation of all signals closed during the reporting interval; 5.16.2 Evaluation of new information with respect to known identified and potential risks; 5.16.3 Updated characterisation of important risks (where applicable); 5.16.4 Summary of effectiveness of risk minimisation activities New status

B.5.16.1 Summary of Safety Describe important and potential risks and missing information (use safety specification) If no safety specification is available, consider: Important adverse reactions Interaction (drug-drug, drug-food) medication errors Occupational exposure Class effects Concerns

B.5.16.2 Signal evaluation Summarise evaluation of all safety signals that were closed during the reporting interval (whether or not classified as important) Categories Closed and refuted signals Closed (= important identified risk) Closed (= important potential risk) Closed (= potential risk but not important) Closed (= identified risk but not important) Inclusion in RMP Relevant for B/R Practical consequence? (see next slide)

Mapping signals and risks to PSUR sections ICHE2E = Safety Specification

B.5.17 Benefit Evaluation 17.1 Important baseline efficacy and effectiveness information 17.2 Newly identified information on efficacy and effectiveness 17.3 Characterisation of benefits baseline Integrates 17.1 &17.2 and supports B/R evaluation

B.5.17.3 characterisation of benefits If required, consider (selection): new information that challenges validity surrogate endpoint Clinical relevance of the effect size Generalisibility of treatment response across indicated patient population Duration of effect Comparative efficacy

B.5.18 Integrated benefit-risk analysis for authorized indications Critical analysis and integration of subsections Characterisation of risks 16.4 Vs Characterisation of benefits 17.3

B.5.18.1 Medical need and important alternatives Alternatives (medical, surgical, no treatment) Tip: consider guidelines from expert organisations (NICE, American Heart Association etc)

B.5.18.2 B/R analysis evaluation B/R specific to indication and population Multiple indications multiple B/Rs Potentially differentiate by population (e.g. paediatric vs adult)

B.5.18.2 B/R analysis evaluation (cont.) Present B and R in a way that facilitates comparison Focus on important B and R Context of use (prevention, severity of illness) Key benefits: effect size and duration, clinical importance, generalisibility, efficacy in non-responders to other therapies Risk: clinical importance (frequency, seriousness, predicatability, preventability, reversibility, off label use, misuse) Explain methodology Do not consider economic arguments

B.5.19. Conclusions & actions B/R status changed / unchanged RSI change (Describe here proposed changes to SmPC) RMP update required? Additional Risk Minimisation activities required?

Appendices RSI Cumulative summary tabulations Summary Safety Signals Listings All MAH-sponsored interventional trials All MAH-sponsored non-interventional trials List of sources of information used to prepare the PSUR Regional appendix

Regional appendix RSI Cumulative summary tabulations Summary Safety Signals Listings All MAH-sponsored interventional trials All MAH-sponsored non-interventional trials List of sources of information used to prepare the PSUR Regional appendix

Thank you for you attention. Questions?

Back up

Regional appendix C.5.1 Proposed product information SmPC / PIL, list ongoing variations C.5.2 Proposed additional PV and Risk Minimisation activities Statement of intention to submit RMP, or Updated RMP Summary of safety concerns (from RMP available at beginning of PSUR) Final study report (PASS) Risk minimisation: (useful) other region material

Administrative aspects Submit PSUR 70 days after DLP (12 month PSUR) Submit PSUR 90 days after DLP (> 12 month PSUR)

Administrative aspects PSUR submission requirements waived for: Routine generic medicinal products (authorised under Art 10(1) of DIR 2001/83 Well-established use medicinal products (Art 10a) Homeopathic medicinal products (Art 14) Traditional herbal medicinal products (Art 16a), 107 b (3) a + b