Please find attached a copy of the Food Authority's formal response for inclusion in your final report.

Similar documents
Smart meters: Removing regulatory barriers and maintaining consumer safety for a market-led roll out of smart meters in New South Wales

Mr Timothy Pilgrim The Privacy Commissioner Office of the Australian Information Commissioner GPO Box 5218 SYDNEY NSW 2001

GUIDE TO IMPLEMENTING A REGULATORY FOOD SAFETY AUDITOR SYSTEM

Professional Development for Engagement Partners Responsible for Audits of Financial Statements (Revised)

The Compliance Universe

BUSINESS REGULATION BENCHMARKING: PLANNING, ZONING AND DEVELOPMENT ASSESSMENTS

COAG National Legal Profession Reform Discussion Paper: Trust money and trust accounting

Collaborative development of evaluation capacity and tools for natural resource management

Environmental Management systems guidelines Risk-based licensing.

GUIDELINE NO. 22 REGULATORY AUDITS OF ENERGY BUSINESSES

TGA key performance indicators and reporting measures

27 November The Hon. Joe Hockey MP Treasurer PO Box 6022 House of Representatives Parliament House CANBERRA ACT 2600

COMPLIANCE FRAMEWORK AND REPORTING GUIDELINES

Version No: 2 Date: 27 July Data Quality Policy. Assistant Chief Executive. Planning & Performance. Data Quality Policy

Submission to the Department of Environment Regulation s Draft Guidance Statement on Regulatory Principles December 2014

The anglo american Safety way. Safety Management System Standards

Legislative and Governance Forum on Food Regulation (convening as the Australia and New Zealand Food Regulation Ministerial Council)

The audit and inspection of local authorities

Proposed guidance for firms outsourcing to the cloud and other third-party IT services

Energy Markets and Programs Division GPO Box 1264 Adelaide SA 5001

Hertsmere Borough Council. Data Quality Strategy. December

BETTER REGULATION OFFICE DEPARTMENT OF WATER AND ENERGY OFFICE OF FAIR TRADING ISSUES PAPER. New South Wales Government

AANA Submission: Advertising Therapeutic Goods in Australia: Consultation Paper

Draft Decision. Approach to compliance with the National Energy Retail Law, Rules and Regulations

NATIONAL PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT ON THE NATIONAL QUALITY AGENDA FOR EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUCATION AND CARE

The NSW Business Chamber (the Chamber) welcomes the opportunity to comment on IPART s Pricing VET under Smart and Skilled draft report.

Submission to Standing Committee of Officials Of Consumer Affairs (SCOCA) on draft Australian Consumer Law Regulations

ERM Business Energy welcomes the opportunity to respond to the Department of State Development s (DSD) REES Consultation Paper (the Paper).

Australian Energy Market Commission

AER Submission. Competition Policy Review Draft Report

Submission in response to the Life Insurance and Advice Working Group Interim Report on Retail Life Insurance

Overview of GFSI and Accredited Certification

ATTORNEY GENERAL'S DEPARTMENT OF NSW & THE DEPARTMENT OF PREMIER AND CABINET

Australian superannuation funds should be exempt from FATCA withholding obligations on this basis.

Independent Pricing and Regulatory Tribunal. Customer engagement on prices for monopoly services

AER reference: 52454; D14/54321 ACCC_09/14_865

Discussion paper on possible enhancements to the requirements for customer due diligence

Study on Enhancing Investment Adviser Examinations

BANKING UNIT BANKING RULES OUTSOURCING BY CREDIT INSTITUTIONS AUTHORISED UNDER THE BANKING ACT 1994

Regulatory Information and Data Quality Assurance Policy

Australian Transport Council. National Standard for the Administration of Marine Safety SECTION 4 SURVEYS OF VESSELS

Scottish Borders Council. Local Scrutiny Plan 2015/16

Distribution businesses performance against customer service indicators

Memorandum of Understanding between the NSW Ministry of Health and Sydney Water Corporation

Measuring your capabilities in Workplace Safety Management

WA Food Regulation: Temporary and Mobile Food Businesses

Future Directions for the Border Sector

Human Resource Change Management Plan

RE: IESBA s Exposure Draft Responding to Non-Compliance with Laws and Regulations

Performance Audit Report: Debt Management. Report no. 01 / 2015 February 2015

REVIEW OF ELECTRICITY (CONSUMER SAFETY) ACT 2004 ISSUES PAPER

Draft Guidance: Non-economic Regulators: Duty to Have Regard to Growth

Regulatory Burdens Social & Economic Infrastructure Services

Small business guide to trade practices compliance programs. April 2006

Lead Responsibility authority and accountability see. Finish date. Commencement date. Ongoing. Ongoing. Ongoing. Ongoing. NHO Ann Doherty.

Second Clinical Safety Review of the Personally Controlled Electronic Health Record (PCEHR) June 2013

10 Shenton Way MAS Building Singapore Telephone: (65) Facsimile: (65)

Plumbing and Drainage Regulation 2012

Resolution of Small Business Disputes Options Paper

Some Text Here. Policy Overview. Regulation Impact Statement for Early Childhood Education and Care Quality Reforms. July 2009

Disability Action Plan

Improving the ACT Building Regulatory System

ENTERPRISE RISK MANAGEMENT POLICY

Disability Employment Services Quality Framework Advice V 2.0

How To Manage Risk At Atb Financial

The APRA Supervision Blueprint

CONSULTATION PAPER ON HIGH LEVEL PRINCIPLES ON OUTSOURCING COVER NOTE

SUPERVISORY AND REGULATORY GUIDELINES: PU GUIDELINES ON MINIMUM STANDARDS FOR THE OUTSOURCING OF MATERIAL FUNCTIONS

QUEENSLAND COUNTRY HEALTH FUND. privacy policy. Queensland Country Health Fund Ltd ABN better health cover shouldn t hurt

NECA response to Industry Engagement in Training Package Development Towards a Contestable Model Discussion Paper

Actuaries Institute submission to the Private Health Insurance Review

1.1 Terms of Reference Y P N Comments/Areas for Improvement

Statement of responsibilities of auditors and audited bodies: Local authorities, NHS bodies and small authorities.

Re: Docket No. FDA 2014 N 0339: Proposed Risk-Based Regulatory Framework and Strategy for Health Information Technology Report; Request for Comments

GUIDELINES FOR THE CONDUCT OF PERFORMANCE AUDITS

Framework for Long Term Financial and Asset Management Planning for all Tasmanian Councils

Corporate Summary. Company Background

Financial Services Guidance Note Outsourcing

Quality Assurance. Policy P7

Document Downloaded: Monday July 27, A-21 Task Force Document on Effort Reporting Requirement. Author: David Kennedy. Published Date: 11/14/2011

CQC s strategy 2016 to Shaping the future: consultation document

CCIR Proposal Privilege and Whistle-Blower Protection

Council of Financial Regulators: Review of Financial Market Infrastructure Regulation

INVESTING IN REFORM INVESTING IN STOCKPORT DRAFT BUSINESS CASE

Universities Australia Response to the Review of the ESOS Framework Discussion Paper

Health and Safety Policy Part 1 Policy and organisation

Statement of Guidance: Outsourcing All Regulated Entities

Criteria for adopting International Standards and Risk Assessments

GUIDELINES FOR FOOD IMPORT CONTROL SYSTEMS

Qantas welcomes the opportunity to comment on the Financial System Inquiry Final Report (the Report) released on Sunday, 7 December 2014.

Performance Development Framework. NSW Public Sector

Research and Innovation Strategy: delivering a flexible workforce receptive to research and innovation

For captive insurers and captive insurance managers

Accreditation Workbook for Mental Health Services. March 2014

SOCIAL CARE FUNDING: STATEMENT OF INTENT

Charities Bill 2013 and the Charities (Consequential Amendments and Transitional Provisions) Bill 2013

Review into the governance, efficiency, structure and operation of Australia s superannuation system: Phase one governance

Financial Ombudsman Service Terms of Reference response to submissions New South Wales / ACT Queensland NT / SA / Tas / WA Victoria

Inspection of the London Borough of Barking and Dagenham s arrangements for supporting school improvement

ASTRAZENECA GLOBAL POLICY SAFETY, HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENT (SHE)

Transcription:

NSW GOVERNMENT Department of Primary Industries Food Authority 22 August 2016 Our ref INT16/102940 Ms Margaret Crawford Auditor-General of NSW GPO Box 12 SYDNEY NSW 2001 Dear Ms Crawford Thank you for undertaking the performance audit in relation to food safety practices in retail businesses and for the opportunity to respond to your report. I also thank your review team and the NSW Food Authority (Food Authority) staff who assisted them. Please find attached a copy of the Food Authority's formal response for inclusion in your final report. The Food Authority operates as part of the Biosecurity and Food Safety Branch of the NSW Department of Primary Industries within the NSW Department of Industry, Skills and Regional Development. The context for the Food Authority's engagement with local government reflects councils' long standing responsibility for food safety in the retail food service sector. It can sometimes be taken for granted, but arrangements which ensure the safety of our food supply are fundamental to the orderly and harmonious function of our society. In the past, each local council had separate and in many cases inconsistent food safety inspection and compliance regimes. The Food Regulation Partnership was formalised in 2008 to bring these disparate regimes together under a single consistent system overseen and coordinated by the Food Authority under the Food Act 2003. The Food Authority places a very high value on this Partnership and supports the Partnership with a dedicated local government unit to provide council and other enforcement agency staff with food safety leadership, training and technical support. The Partnership has been recognised as best regulatory practice by the Independent Pricing and Regulatory Tribunal (IPART) but was nevertheless formally evaluated in 2012 as part of the Food Authority's commitment to continuous improvement. The Food Authority welcomes your Performance Audit as a further opportunity for external evaluation of arrangements that underpin food safety in the retail food service sector. The Food Authority also welcomes your assessment of areas where these arrangements are operating effectively and others where they can be improved. In particular, your audit provides independent verification of the progress the Food Authority has already made to address emerging retail food business issues and the importance of its aspirations to better understand retail food business compliance by collecting more timely and precise data from enforcement agencies. NSW Food Authority 6 Avenue of the Americas I Newington NSW 2127 PO Box 6682 Silverwater NSW 1811 T: 02 9741 4777 I F: 02 9741 4888 I W: www.foodauthority.nsw.qov.au I F: /nswfoodauthority I T: @nswfoodauth ABN: 47 080 404 416

I am pleased to advise that the Food Authority accepts your recommendations for improvement noting that delivery of recommendations with cost and resource implications will hinge on the success of a business case. The Food Authority will also consult and require agreement of key stakeholders to progress recommendations affecting the operation of the Partnership. Further, the formal response notes complexities that will prevent some recommendations being delivered by June 2017, with June 2018 suggested as more realistic albeit still a very ambitious target for most recommendations and 2019 as a similarly ambitious target for recommendation 1.4. Yours sincerely Lisa CEO NSW Food Authority Page 2 of 2

NSW Food Authority response to recommendations by the Auditor-General of NSW in relation to monitoring food safety practices in retail food businesses. The Auditor-General recommended that the Food Authority should by June 2017: 1. improve its risk-based : 1.1 monitoring the consistency and quality of regulatory activities undertaken by councils and other enforcement agencies 1.2 clarifying the roles and responsibilities between it, councils and other enforcement agencies 1.3 updating its guidelines to councils, including defining distinct monitoring requirements for medium and high risk retail food businesses 1.4 developing additional detailed performance indicators, with baseline data, to assess the effectiveness of regulatory activities undertaken by councils and other enforcement agencies. 2. improve its monitoring and oversight of food safety inspection and enforcement activities, conducted by councils on its behalf, by: 2.1 ensuring it receives and promptly analyses sufficient and timely information from councils 2.2 improving the availability of training and guidance material for council inspectors. The Food Authority notes that recommendations 1.1, 1.4 and 2.1 each rely on improving the collection, analysis and use of information generated during retail food business inspections. Their implementation requires consultation and a successful business case but even so cannot be completed by June 2017. Recommendations 1.2, 1.3 and 2.2 each relate to the roles, responsibilities and activities of enforcement agencies. They require consultation and should be achievable within the June 2017 timeframe subject to their acceptance by enforcement agencies. The Food Authority's response to each recommendation is listed in the table below. NSW Food Authority response to each recommendation Recommendation Response Comments 1.1 improve its risk- Support and The Food Authority has already recognised the based note that this is need to move beyond the current reliance on monitoring the best realised aggregated annual data and has commenced consistency and by use of exploring options for more timely and precise quality of regulatory activities technology, which cannot reporting. Improving the Food Authority's capability in relation to recommendations 1.1, 1.4 undertaken by be and 2.1 will require regular access to the Food councils and other implemented Premises Assessment Reports (FPAR) generated enforcement by June 2017 during retail food business inspections. This will agencies. require new arrangements to collect, store, June 2018 is a analyse and use this information. possible and ambitious The Board of Local Government NSW also has target subject advocated for reforms of this nature to promote to a successful business case broader adoption of the voluntary Scores on Doors initiative by proposing the development of a centralised database.

1.2 improve its riskbased clarifying the roles and responsibilities between it, councils and other enforcement agencies 1.3 improve its riskbased updating its guidelines to councils, including defining distinct monitoring requirements for medium and high risk retail food businesses 1.4 improve its riskbased developing additional detailed performance indicators, with Support Support Support and note that this is not achievable by June 2017 June 2019 is a These arrangements will also provide a pathway to deal with the inefficiencies and duplication of inspections that arise when temporary and mobile food vendors trade across multiple council areas; an area of concern raised by both IPART and the Food Regulation Forum which provides advice on oversight of the Partnership. The Food Authority will develop a business case for a single electronic platform to regularly capture FPAR data. Time will be needed to consult with enforcement agencies, to develop and identify critical design and usability elements to inform a funding business case and, if successful, implement the platform. It will not be possible to complete this by June 2017. Once operational, the platform will allow monitoring of FPAR data to assess the consistency and quality of food regulatory activities undertaken by enforcement agencies. The Food Authority has already earmarked the enforcement agency instruments of appointment for review and re-issue due to council amalgamations and the length of time since they were originally issued (2008). Further issues may be identified for consideration by a current Food Authority project to understand trends emerging from the collaborative economy such as food produced from home kitchens and also food sold via food apps. Revised guidelines will also be provided to more clearly explain enforcement agency roles and responsibilities. The Food Authority will consult with enforcement agencies on the revision of the instruments of appointment and guidelines. The Food Authority has already commenced a review of the rationale underpinning the inspection frequency of retail food businesses following IPART's report on Local Government Compliance and Enforcement. This review includes the risk based classification that applies to medium and high risk retail food businesses. This information will be included in the Food Authority's enforcement agency guidelines when these are revised and re-issued as per 1.2 above. See 1.1 The realisation of a single electronic platform to regularly capture FPAR data will facilitate the establishment of baseline data. Using this informaiton, the Food Authority will consult with our food regulatory partners to establish

baseline data, to possible and performance indicators that readily identify assess the ambitious inconsistencies in regulatory activities and provide effectiveness of target based additional intelligence to help deal with emerging regulatory activities on collection of foodborne illness trends or novel food types that undertaken by a full year's may be associated with emerging foodborne councils and other data and illness risks. enforcement subject to agencies. successful In practice, this information will improve implementation compliance with enforcement agency of the platform in 2018 performance targets but is unlikely to identify different performance targets for individual enforcement agencies. 2.1 improve its June 2018 is a See 1.1 and 1.4 monitoring and possible and oversight of food ambitious safety inspection target subject and enforcement to a successful activities, business case conducted by councils on its behalf by ensuring it receives and promptly analyses sufficient and timely information from councils. 2.2 improve its Support The Food Authority will provide training materials monitoring and oversight of food safety inspection and enforcement activities, conducted by councils on its behalf by improving the availability of training and guidance material for council inspectors. and resources online and develop options for food inspectors to have remote access to training and networking. The Food Authority will seek to further improve access to training and development opportunities by including in the new instruments of appointment, a commitment from enforcement agencies that staff undertake regular professional development training and participate in regular networking meetings. The Food Authority notes that the NSW food legislation which underpins the Partnership prevents it from subjecting enforcement agencies to new conditions against their will.