ETHICS & THE NEW RULES



Similar documents
Ethical Issues Facing Today s Transportation Lawyers

Application For Misdemeanor Court-Appointments

R. Scott Krause, Esq. Eccleston & Wolf, P.C. Hanover, Maryland

Conclusions: 1. No, qualified. 2. Yes. 3. No, qualified. Discussion:

A Guide for the General Practitioner: Ethical Issues When Evaluating, Selecting and Handling Personal Injury Case I.

THE AMERICAN LAW INSTITUTE Continuing Legal Education. Estate Planning for the Family Business Owner

Rivers McNamara, PLLC 1209 West Fifth Street, Suite 200 Austin, Texas (512)

Ethical issues raised in bulk settlement agreements in mass torts

MULTIPLE REPRESENTATION AND DRAFTING CONTINGENCY FEE AGREEMENTS

Homeline CLE Top Ten Ethical Issue That Impact Family Law Lawyers

5/12/2015 AGGREGATE PROCEEDINGS PURPOSE OF AGGREGATE PROCEEDINGS

What to Do When Your Witness Testimony Doesn t Match His or Her Declaration

ATTORNEY APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT (LONG)

Drafting the Joint Defense Agreement

WEBB COUNTY APPLICATION/AFFIDAVIT Criminal Felony, Misdemeanor or Juvenile Courts Attorney Appointment Rotation List

American Board of Professional Liability Attorneys *ABA Accredited Organization

12/3/2015. Thomas J. Farrell Farrell and Reisinger, LLC Pittsburgh


BANKRUPTCY AND DEBTOR-CREDITOR LAW SPECIALIZATION ADVISORY BOARD STANDARDS AND PROCEDURES FOR CERTIFICATION, RECERTIFICATION AND DECERTIFICATION

EL PASO DISTRICT AND COUNTY COURTS TEXAS FAIR DEFENSE ACT ATTORNEY APPLICATION DO NOT USE THE BACK OF PAGES

A Practical Guide to. Hiring a LAWYER

STANDARD CONTINGENT FEE REPRESENTATION AGREEMENT FOR INDIVIDUALS

ETHICAL RULES AND AGGREGATE SETTLEMENTS

THE ASSOCIATION OF THE BAR OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK COMMITTEE ON PROFESSIONAL AND JUDICIAL ETHICS FORMAL OPINION AGGREGATE SETTLEMENTS

KENTUCKY BAR ASSOCIATION RULES OF THE SUPREME COURT OF KENTUCKY PRACTICE OF LAW

NEW MEXICO BOARD OF LEGAL SPECIALIZATION AN AGENCY OF THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW MEXICO STANDARDS FOR LEGAL SPECIALIZATION WORKERS COMPENSATION LAW

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND. Misc. Docket AG. No. 13. September Term, 2005 ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION OF MARYLAND WILLIAM M.

PROFESSIONAL COUNSELSM

THE AMERICAN LAW INSTITUTE Continuing Legal Education. Estate Planning for the Family Business Owner

2008 WI 91 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN. In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against R. L. McNeely, Attorney at Law:

MICHIGAN APPELLATE ASSIGNED COUNSEL SYSTEM (MAACS) BASIC INFORMATION SHEET

NEW MEXICO BOARD OF LEGAL SPECIALIZATION AN AGENCY OF THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW MEXICO STANDARDS FOR LEGAL SPECIALIZATION FAMILY LAW

THE FIFTH ADMINISTRATIVE JUDICIAL REGION OF TEXAS

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE CIVIL MEDIATION PROGRAM GUIDELINES

Legal Ethics: THE LAWYER S ROLE WHEN SOMETHING GOES WRONG

CHAPTER 4 ETHICAL ISSUES FOR THE LEGISLATIVE LAWYER

Rule 42. Practice of attorneys not admitted in Nevada. (1) All actions or proceedings pending before a court in this state;

Mary H. Spillane Member. Mary H. Spillane

Ethics Opinion

Application Process for Juvenile Court Appointments

DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT POLICY NO.: 1.05 POLICIES AND PROCEDURES MANUAL EFFT. DATE: UPDATED: ALCOHOL AND OTHER DRUGS

FAMILY LAW SECTION, STATE BAR OF NEVADA THE STANDARDS FOR BOARD CERTIFIED SPECIALIZATION IN FAMILY LAW

Complying with the FCPA- An Exploration of Ethical Issues Raised by Recent Cases Are the Professional Conduct Rules Any Different?

Debra Liss Thomas has been an attorney in Chicago for more than 10 years. She is a dedicated member of the Illinois State Bar Association and has

CARLSMITH BALL LLP HONOLULU HILO KONA MAUI GUAM LOS ANGELES

MARYLAND RULES OF PROCEDURE TITLE 1 GENERAL PROVISIONS CHAPTER 100 APPLICABILITY AND CITATION

KATHRYN RENÉE WEBER LEGAL EXPERIENCE

58 th UIA CONGRESS Florence / Italy October 29 November 2, 2014 FAMILY LAW COMMISSSION. Family Law Mediation and the Role of Today s Family Lawyer

HOUSTON LAWYER REFERRAL SERVICE, INC. RULES OF MEMBERSHIP

Nebraska Ethics Advisory Opinion for Lawyers No. 01-3

Reflections on Ethical Issues In the Tripartite Relationship

OPINION Issued August 8, Imputation of Conflicts in a Part-Time County Prosecutor s Law Firm

Notice of Class Action Lawsuit and Proposed Settlement. You May be Entitled to Receive a Settlement Payment.

WELCOMING REMARKS LGBT Law Section. Shelly L. Skeen Blume, Faulkner, Skeen & Northam, PLLC Richardson. Friday, June 27, :25 a.m. 8:30 a.m.

Drafting Ethical, Effective Engagement Letters that Reduce Firm Liability and Improve Client Relationships

YOUR TOP TEN FERPA QUESTIONS ASKED AND (HOPEFULLY) ANSWERED

INDIANA PARALEGAL ASSOCIATION CODE OF ETHICS AND PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY AND RULES FOR ENFORCEMENT

STANDARDS FOR ATTORNEY CERTIFICATION OF THE TEXAS BOARD OF LEGAL SPECIALIZATION. The Standards for Attorney Certification are divided into two parts.

MICHAEL S. WILK Attorney, Arbitrator, and Mediator

KATHRYN RENÉE WEBER LEGAL EXPERIENCE

The Nuts and Bolts of Handling a Pro Bono Tax Controversy Case. Presented by The ABA Section of Taxation

Standards and Requirements for Specialist Certification and Recertification

2011: The Year in Ethics and Bar Discipline. By Constance V. Vecchione, Bar Counsel January 2012

Attorneys convicted of crimes.

*Rule 1.4(a) *Rule 1.16(a) *Rule 1.16(a)(2) *Rule 1.16(b) *Rule 3.3 *DR7-102(A)(4) *DR7-102(A)(6)

SAMPLE LAWYER-CLIENT ENGAGEMENT LETTER

LOCAL RULES OF ORANGE COUNTY FOR THE TIMELY AND FAIR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL FOR INDIGENT DEFENDANTS BY ORANGE COUNTY COURTS

What to do when a lawyer dies:

GUIDANCE FOR EMPLOYED BARRISTERS. Part 1. General

Bylaws of the Lawyer-Client Fee Dispute Resolution Committee of the Cleveland Metropolitan Bar Association. Enacted November 18, 2015

HOUSTON LAWYER REFERRAL SERVICE, INC. APPLICATION FOR MEMBERSHIP

APPLICATION FOR INDIGENT REPRESENTATION

STEPHEN M. ORLOFSKY. Practice Concentration / v.2 A PENNSYLVANIA LLP

CODE OF ETHICS AND PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY FOR DELAWARE PARALEGALS PREAMBLE

AGENDA FOR RULES COMMITTEE MEETING. October 9, 2015 (Friday)

ESTATE PLANNING AND PROBATE LAW SPECIALIZATION ADVISORY BOARD STANDARDS AND PROCEDURES FOR CERTIFICATION, RECERTIFICATION, AND DECERTIFICATION

APPLICATION TO THE SACRAMENTO COUNTY BAR/ INDIGENT DEFENSE PANEL (IDP)

Comparison of Newly Adopted Arizona Rules of Professional Conduct with ABA Model Rules

STANDARD 3.5 ON ASSISTANCE TO PRO SE LITIGANTS

How To Manage Trust Account Money In Indiana

Conflict Between Driver and Guest-Passenger Legal Representation in the State of Louisiana

Ethical Considerations in Dealing with Expert Witnesses. Thomas M. Fitzpatrick

EVELYN V. KEYES 3655 PIPING ROCK HOUSTON, TEXAS (TEL.) (713) (CELL) (FAX) (713)

Collaborative Law Participation Agreement

RULES GOVERNING THE OPERATION OF THE TEXAS ACCESS TO JUSTICE FOUNDATION

Texas Lawyer Discipline - A Summary

Transcription:

ETHICS & THE NEW RULES THOMAS H. WATKINS, Austin Brown McCarroll LLP State Bar of Texas 19 th ANNUAL TEXAS MINORITY COUNSEL PROGRAM September 7-9, 2011 Austin, Texas CHAPTER 15

Thomas Watkins Brown McCarroll, LLP 111 Congress Ave. Austin, TX 78701 phone: (512) 703-5752 twatkins@brownmccarroll.com BACKGROUND, EDUCATION AND PRACTICE Tom Watkins is a Texas attorney specializing in complex business litigation. He is a Partner of Brown McCarroll, L.L.P. in Austin. Mr. Watkins received his BA in Government from the University of Oklahoma in 1962 and his LLB from the University of Texas Law School in 1964, Phi Delta Phi. He is Board Certified in Civil Trial Law by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization. Mr. Watkins is a Fellow of the American College of Trial Lawyers, Associate of the American Board of Trial Advocates, Chairman of the CLE Committee for the State Bar of Texas, Member of the State Bar of Professional Ethics Committee, Member of the Association of Trial Lawyers of America, Member of the Texas Trial Lawyer s Association, Member of the College of the State Bar of Texas, Member of the Austin Intellectual Property Law Association, Member of the Federal Circuit Bar Association, Member of the Texas Business Law Foundation, Member of the Texas Bar Foundation, and Chair of the Capital Area Public Affairs Committee for the March of Dimes. Mr. Watkins has formerly held the following positions: Chairman of District Nine Grievance Committee, Member of the Commission for Lawyer Discipline, Chairman of the Board of Disciplinary Appeals, President of the Texas Association for Mental Health, President of the National Association for Mental Health, President of the Austin Junior Bar, President of the Travis County Bar Association, Member of the Board of Directors for the State Bar of Texas, and Vice Chairman of the Litigation Section for the State Bar of Texas.

Best Practices Under the Current Rules Thomas H. Watkins 111 Congress Avenue, Suite 1400, Austin, TX 78701 office: 512-703-5752 mobile: 512-470-3483 fax: 512-480-5033 www.brownmccarroll.com General conflicts 1.06 (1) involves a substantially related matter in which that persons interests are materially and directly adverse to the interests of another client of the lawyer or the lawyers firm; or (2) reasonably appears to be or become adversely limited by the lawyers or law firm's responsibilities to another client or to a third person or by the lawyers or law firms own interests. Not the ABA rule Not the rule in other states Not the rule in federal court 1

Taking a case against a current client The problem is with the second part of 1.06 (2) reasonably appears to be or become adversely limited by the lawyers or law firm's responsibilities to another client or to a third person or by the lawyers or law firms own interests What does: appears to be or become adversely limited mean? Best Practices 1. Draft a tight scope of representation in engagement letter 2.a.Get a waiver from both clients, or b. give notice to both clients of representation 2

General conflicts 1.06 disclosures (2) each affected or potentially affected client consents to such representation after full disclosure of the existence, nature, implications, and possible adverse consequences of the common representation and the advantages involved, if any. existence nature implications possible adverse consequences the advantages 1.06 Representing multiple clients appears to be or become adversely limited If so : (2) each affected or potentially affected client consents to such representation after full disclosure of the existence, nature, implications, and possible adverse consequences of the common representation and the advantages involved, if any. Very hard to do 3

Best practices Every time you represent multiple clients: 1. List the advantages: a. Save attorneys fees b. save costs c. save time 2. List the disadvantages: a. Cannot solve problems between them b. No confidential information between them c. If they have falling out, may have to withdraw 1.08 Conflict of Interest: Prohibited Transactions (a) A lawyer shall not enter into a business transaction with a client unless: (1) the transaction and terms on which the lawyer acquires the interest are fair and reasonable to the client and are fully disclosed in a manner which can be reasonably understood by the client; (2) the client is given a reasonable opportunity to seek the advice of independent counsel in the transaction; and (3) the client consents in writing thereto. 4

1.08 Business with client Best Practices 1. Make the disclosures in writing 2. Do not have the client sign it the same day it is received 3. Say only that the client had the opportunity to seek counsel. 1.08 Conflict of Interest: Prohibited Transactions aggregate settlements (f) A lawyer who represents two or more clients shall not participate in making an aggregate settlement of the claims of or against the clients, or in a criminal case an aggregated agreement to guilty or nolo contendere pleas, unless each client has consented after consultation, including disclosure of the existence and nature of all the claims or pleas involved and of the nature and extent of the participation of each person in the settlement. 1.Each party must know what other parties are getting 2. Class action may not protect? 5

1.08 Aggregate settlements Best practices 1. Plaintiffs should obtain court approved matrix 2. Each release should have matrix attached when executed 3. Each client should receive a letter explanation 1.14 SAFEKEEPING PROPERTY (A) A LAWYER SHALL HOLD FUNDS AND OTHER PROPERTY BELONGING IN WHOLE OR IN PART TO CLIENTS OR THIRD PERSONS THAT ARE IN A LAWYERS POSSESSION IN CONNECTION WITH A REPRESENTATION SEPARATE FROM THE LAWYERS OWN PROPERTY. (B) UPON RECEIVING FUNDS OR OTHER PROPERTY IN WHICH A CLIENT OR THIRD PERSON HAS AN INTEREST, A LAWYER SHALL PROMPTLY NOTIFY THE CLIENT OR THIRD PERSON. What is the lawyer s duty to third party? 6

1.14 SAFEKEEPING PROPERTY Best Practices 1. Get written representation from client 2. Review file for any mention of: a. Liens b. partnership or other entities c. spouse or other relatives d. other attorneys 7