PLAYING FAIR. with the Children of Illinois

Similar documents
PROFILE OF CHANGES IN COLORADO PUBLIC SCHOOL FUNDING

Money Matters. A Publication of the Minnesota House Fiscal Analysis Department on Government Finance Issues. State Property Tax and Education Funding

SCHOOL FUNDING COMPLETE RESOURCE

Understanding How Changes in EAV Affect A School District's Tax Rate and Levy This presentation will explain the important relationship between

The Truth about the State Employees Retirement System of Illinois

OVERVIEW OF THE STRUCTURE OF THE ILLINOIS SCHOOL FINANCE SYSTEM

School Finance 101. MASA / MASE Spring Conference Joel Sutter Ehlers Greg Crowe - Ehlers

School District Snapshot

Public Education In Bucks County

As the discussion about school funding and tax reform

Financing Education In Minnesota A Publication of the Minnesota House of Representatives Fiscal Analysis Department

Public Education Funding Solutions June 17, 2014

F I N A N CE UNDERSTANDING SCHOOL. Questions & Answers Baker Drive Springfield, Illinois /

Louisiana s Minimum Foundation Program Formula: Analyzing the Results

Research Report HOW CHARTER SCHOOL FUNDING COMPARES. Florida TaxWatch Center for Educational Performance and Accountability.

What You Need to Know about the Tax Levy Cap

Overview of the School Finance System

LSC Redbook. Analysis of the Executive Budget Proposal. Department of Education

What if Indiana Eliminated Personal Property Taxes? Larry DeBoer Department of Agricultural Economics Purdue University. June 2014

RESEARCH BRIEF. Increasing Maine s High School Graduation Rate: Necessary But Not Sufficient

Workforce Training Results Report December 2008

Making a Case for Need-based Financial Aid in Georgia By Cedric D. Johnson, Policy Analyst

March 12, 2007 Survey Results on Education Among California Business Leaders

February 2014 Maintenance & Operations (M&O) Levy Question and Answers, Updated

The NEVADA PLAN For School Finance An Overview

Education in Georgia: Growing Expectations, Shrinking State Investment

Changes in Educational Spending in Kentucky Since KERA and HB1

Minnetonka Independent School District 276 Levy Adoption Taxes Payable in 2012

How Utah Public Schools are Funded. Office of Legislative Research and General Counsel February 5, 2013

Santora CPA Group. State of Delaware Statewide School Districts Construction Projects Attestation Engagements Capital School District

How s Life in the United States?

PRELIMINARY BUDGET HANDBOOK

Life Insurance Buyer's Guide

A Cost Analysis for Texas Public Schools. Prepared by: Sponsored by: 2008 Update

Arkansas Property Tax: Revenue, Assessments & Rates

DRAFT TUITION BASED PRESCHOOL ACTION PLAN

Getting a Community After School Program Off the Ground Tip Sheet for Iowa State University Extension Staff

The Education Dollar. A Look at Spending and Funding Trends

Components 127th General Assembly 128th General Assembly

Amendment 66 will improve Colorado s income tax

The Basics of Quality Basic Education (QBE) Funding

OVERVIEW OF CURRENT SCHOOL ADMINISTRATORS

Overview of State Funding for Public Education in Idaho

New York Property Tax Cap Implications for School Districts

MISSOURI. Gerri Ogle Coordinator, School Administrative Services Department of Elementary and Secondary Education I. GENERAL BACKGROUND.

P O L I C Y B R I E F THE MISSOURI K-12 FOUNDATION FORMULA

ONE ISLAND ONE VOICE. Tax Cap Impact & Other Important Facts. Dr. Anthony J. Annunziato President. Mr. Gary D. Bixhorn Legislative Chairperson

Analysis of School Finance Equity and Local Wealth Measures in Maryland

The Property Tax in New York State. Condition Report Prepared for the Education Finance Research Consortium December 2008

What s the Cost of Spending and Saving?

budget brief On Tuesday, August 3, legislative leaders proposed a new budget plan, including a tax swap that would increase some

Income Tax RESEARCH POLICY PAPER

Vital Questions and Answers on Preserving the Quality of Our Schools and Protecting Our Quality of Life. Visit our

December, Salary, Education, Benefits, and Job Descriptions of Nurses, Teachers, and Social Workers: A Comparative Analysis

Higher and Rising (Figure 1)

GAO SCHOOL FINANCE. Per-Pupil Spending Differences between Selected Inner City and Suburban Schools Varied by Metropolitan Area

Budget Survey. Survey Results and Analysis. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools January 23 February 8, 2013

2 NEW YORK STATE COMMISSION ON PROPERTY TAX RELIEF 3 Second Commission Meeting 4. 7 New York State Museum Madison Avenue 8 Albany, New York

STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA PUBLIC SCHOOL SUPPORT PROGRAM EXECUTIVE SUMMARY For the Year

Illustration of School Funding in Ohio. Legislative Service Commission 3/2007

DATA AND CHART PACK February 2016

The Concept of Present Value

BUDGET in BRIEF. University of Wisconsin Madison Budget Report

Adecade of disinvestment has left California s spending for public schools lagging the nation by a number of

Health reform gives Mississippi new opportunities to provide homeand

A Tale of Two States: Insurance Premiums in Border Counties of Nebraska and Iowa 1

Why Your Business Needs a Website: Ten Reasons. Contact Us: Info@intensiveonlinemarketers.com

State Notes TOPICS OF LEGISLATIVE INTEREST Summer 2014

Adjusting Compensation for Geographical Differences

School District Funding - How to Get the Most Money You Want

Show Me the Money: Does Shared Capitalism Share the Wealth?

Tompkins County Department of Administration

A Citizen s Guide to Understanding the Budget

The costs of charter and cyber charter schools. Research and policy implications for Pennsylvania school districts. Updated January 2014

Policy Brief June 2010

Texas Two-year Colleges Briefing for State Policymakers

MINNESOTA SCHOOL DISTRICT LEVY EQUALIZATION. Purpose, History and Mechanics

EDUCATION FUNDING IN ARIZONA: CONSTITUTIONAL REQUIREMENT AND THE EMPIRICAL RECORD

Informational Issue: School Finance Funding Case Studies

Writing a degree project at Lund University student perspectives

PENSION COMMUNICATION RESOURCES

Chapter 10 Fiscal Policy Macroeconomics In Context (Goodwin, et al.)

About that Free Lunch

DELAWARE PUBLIC SCHOOL DISTRICT EDUCATION SPENDING Office of Lieutenant Governor Matthew Denn

(Rev. 6-09)

MINNESOTA SCHOOL FINANCE HISTORY

LEGISLATIVE SERVICES AGENCY OFFICE OF FISCAL AND MANAGEMENT ANALYSIS 301 State House (317)

ISSUE REVIEW Fiscal Services Division

Haringey Council. Pay Policy Statement 2015/16. Published April 2015

Human Resources: Compensation/Rewards

Colorado s higher education system at the breaking point

SCHOOL FINANCE IN COLORADO

SCHOOL OCCUPATIONAL LICENSE TAX UNION COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS

Navigating through Year Two. Property Tax Levy Cap

2005 SCHOOL FINANCE LEGISLATION Funding and Distribution

SCHOOL FINANCE IN COLORADO

VIRGINIA. Description of the Formula

Health Value Dashboard FAQ

NEW PHILADELPHIA CITY SCHOOLS FIVE-YEAR FORECAST

Transcription:

PLAYING FAIR with the Children of Illinois All children are entitled to a good start in life, but some of their schools have much more to offer than others. Here s how you can determine the ability of your schools and the steps necessary to ensure an equal opportunity for every child. RICH SCHOOLS, POOR SCHOOLS: Why some children have better schools than others How to measure the wealth of your schools Where to look for solutions to inequity

Do the public schools of Illinois treat the children and taxpayers in your community fairly? Gather the facts to judge for yourself whether your local schools and taxpayers are being treated fairly. That is, can your schools afford to give students the same opportunities and same good start in life that children in other communities receive? What about your school property taxes are they levied at rates similar to those in communities that boast good schools? Or do your tax rates compare with those in school districts that lag behind the rest of the state? Or what may be even less fair do your schools levy taxes at high rates but still lack the income to provide adequate opportunities for students? The answers to these questions depend on where you live, but you can obtain some basic facts that will tell you what you need to know. If you should conclude that the school system in Illinois is shortchanging your local schools and your children, the final question is: What can you do about it? The Illinois picture In beginning your search for answers, it may be helpful to know what researchers have revealed about the big picture in Illinois. Here are some generally accepted observations: 1) There is inequity in school taxes in Illinois. The same $80,000 home might be taxed at $600 in one school district, $1,200 in another and $1,800 in a third. (In Illinois, the average school tax on a $100,000 home is about $1,395, while the average total property tax on the home is about $2,250.) 2) There is inequity in school revenue in Illinois. Some school districts receive nearly $30,000 per pupil each year while others receive just more than $6,000. Of course, costs and prices vary from one location to another, and some schools must provide a wider variety of programs and services that students need and parents demand. Taken together, however, these differences in school needs may not justify such a wide disparity in school district income. In fact, some schools can provide nearly any program desired by parents and students while others cannot afford the bare necessities. 3) Differences in school income are created by a combination of three factors: Property wealth The combined value of all the real estate in a school district determines how much money the schools can generate from their property taxes. Some school districts simply contain a great deal more property wealth than other districts and therefore can generate a great deal more in tax revenue. Tax effort The total assessed value of real property must be multiplied by the school district tax rate to determine the amount of property taxes the district receives. Established by law, tax rates may be raised only by the voters at a referendum. School district tax rates also vary widely, because taxpayers in some districts tax themselves at high rates to support their schools, while some choose not to. State equalization aid The state of Illinois provides equalization funds to compensate for differences in local property wealth, but the dollars appropriated do not bridge the huge gap. School districts that rely primarily on state aid have far less money to spend than districts wealthy enough to rely primarily on local property taxes. Illinois Association of School Boards Playing Fair with the Children of Illinois 2

The picture in your district To judge for yourself whether your local school and taxpayers are being treated fairly, here are the facts you need to ascertain: Adequacy: Are your local schools adequately funded? Check with your school board or district superintendent regarding actual revenue and expenses. Ask parents and educators about the variety and quality of educational programs and services for students. Are salaries high enough to attract and keep good teachers and administrators? It s hard to say how much a good school system should cost, because variations in enrollment create different degrees of efficiency and some communities need or demand programs that are more costly or less costly than others. Revenue needed to run schools varies considerably from place to place. The bottom line is whether our system gives all children an equal opportunity for a decent start in life. The average per pupil expenditure in Illinois for FY 2014-15 was $12,824.06, according to the Illinois State Board of Education, but this figure varies greatly from district to district. The highest reported per pupil costs for 2014-15 were $26,509.41 for a high school district, $30,628.48 for an elementary district and $20,502.68 for a unit district. Lowest spending, in the same order was $9,199.54, $6,036.51 and $7,162.92. If you find both the quality and the cost of your schools satisfactory, you need look no further. However, if you find your schools do not measure up, and if they spend less than the average amounts, you should suspect that your school district s income may be insufficient for its needs. Also look at the number of teachers employed and the salaries they are paid. A district must have enough teachers to support the desired breadth of programs, maintain reasonable class sizes, and provide adequate pupil supervision. A district s salary schedule must be competitive in the marketplace in order to attract and keep good teachers and administrators. Exhibit A TEACHER SALARIES Ranges in Scheduled Salaries and Average Salaries Paid Among Illinois School Districts, 2014-2015 Lowest Highest in State in State Beginning Salary, Bachelor s Degree Among Elementary Districts $26,768 $52,201 Among High School Districts $20,343 $55,474 Among Unit Districts $27,944 $50,938 Highest Scheduled Salary Among Elementary Districts $38,942 $139,241 Among High School Districts $51,834 $138,407 Among Unit Districts $38,172 $117,375 Source: Illinois Teacher Salary Study Some school districts in Illinois pay their teachers twice as much as other districts. Exhibit A presents the highs and lows in beginning teacher salaries and maximum teacher salaries among Illinois school districts. See how your district s salaries compare. Ability: If you conclude that your schools are inadequately funded, the first place to look for a cause is your district s property tax base. Property wealth determines the ability of a community to support its public schools. Your district s tax base consists of the total equalized assessed valuation of all taxable real estate in the district. Your school district administration probably can provide this information, as well as the equalized assessed valuation per pupil. Financial inequity among Illinois schools and property taxpayers stems from the great variation in equalized assessed valuations per pupil. Some districts are supported by huge tax bases $100,000 or more in equalized assessed valuation per pupil. Others have very small tax bases less than $10,000 per pupil. These differences in ability to support schools create inequities in the quantity and quality of programs available to students in different communities. Illinois Association of School Boards Playing Fair with the Children of Illinois 3

Effort: The next place to look for the cause of inadequate funding is your school district s authorized property tax rate. Your tax rate reflects the effort that your community makes to support its schools. Ask your school district administration for your district s operating tax rate. When you multiply this tax rate times your district s equalized assessed valuation per pupil you should get your property tax revenue per pupil for operations. Tax rates beyond minimal levels are established by referendum. Therefore, they reflect the willingness of each community to support its schools. As a result, some districts have tax rates that are twice as high as other districts. Highest rates are usually found in the Chicago suburban areas; lowest rates are more common in rural areas. (Note, however, that districts with large factories or public utilities often can generate adequate income with very low tax rates, which explains why some home owners have smaller tax bills.) If your school tax rate is below average, it may mean your community is not doing its share to support its own schools. If your operating tax rate is below $4.25 per $100 EAV (in a unit district), then your community s lack of effort may be part of the problem. This is the statewide median for Illinois districts serving elementary through high school grades. The median for separate elementary districts is $3.25 and for separate high schools, $2.43. Exhibit B shows the number of Illinois school districts taxing property at different operating rates, from high rates to low rates. See where your school district s operating tax rate ranks, keeping in mind that higher rates depend on voter approval at a referendum. Note, also, that many of the finest schools in Illinois those known for attractive teacher salaries and advanced instructional programs have very high tax rates. There are exceptions, of course, but the top schools in the nation tend to be located in communities that insist on the best and are willing to pay for it. All children will eventually compete with the graduates of these schools. Ability and effort must also be examined in combination. As indicated earlier, plenty of school income may be generated by high wealth (ability) and a low tax rate (effort). By the same token, very small and inadequate income may be generated by low wealth and a high tax rate. Exhibit B LOCAL EFFORT The amount of money a school district receives from property taxes is determined by multiplying the district s Operating Tax Rate times the Equalized Assessed Value of the taxable real property in the district. While total EAV represents a community s property wealth or its ability to support schools its school tax rate represents its actual effort to support schools. If you know your school district s Operating Tax Rate, you can find the rate below to see how your community s tax effort compares with the efforts of other Illinois communities. NUMBERS OF ILLINOIS SCHOOL DISTRICT 2013 Operating Tax Rates Per $100 of Equalized Elementary High School Unit Assessed Valuation Districts Districts Districts More than $6.00 9 0 41 $5.50 to $5.99 12 0 38 $5.00 to $5.49 16 3 73 $4.50 to $4.99 23 2 96 $4.00 to $4.49 37 3 81 $3.50 to $3.99 58 2 37 $3.00 to $3.49 85 9 16 $2.50 to $2.99 90 26 3 $2.00 to $2.49 30 34 1 $1.50 to $1.99 8 15 0 $1.00 to $1.49 6 3 1 Less than $1.00 0 0 0 Total Districts 374 97 387 Median Operating Tax Rates $3.25 $2.43 $4.75 NOTE: Keep in mind that an elementary district serves students through eighth grade and a high school district serves grades nine through 12. A unit district serves all grades through 12th. A taxpayer served by separate elementary and high school districts pays taxes to both, and the separate rates must be added together to make comparisons with rates paid in unit districts. ALSO NOTE: A high tax rate indicates a high degree of local support for schools, regardless of relative property wealth. However, a low tax rate does not always indicate low support for schools. Rather, a few school districts enjoy great property wealth that makes adequate funds available at low tax rates. Source: 2013-2014 Annual Statistical Report of the Illinois State Board of Education, Table 26, EAV and tax rates Illinois Association of School Boards Playing Fair with the Children of Illinois 4

Exhibit C illustrates how wealth and tax rates work together in different combinations. If your schools are inadequately funded, you must determine whether the cause is your community s inadequate ability (property tax wealth) or inadequate effort (property tax rate). If you conclude that effort is the problem, the solution is relatively simple: Work with your school and community leaders to get the tax rate increased at a referendum. Most increases in school tax rates must be approved by local voters. If the problem is ability (lack of adequate property tax wealth), the solution is more complicated. Exhibit C DISPARITIES IN PROPERTY TAX INCOME How different combinations of property wealth and tax effort create disparities in property tax income. PROPERTY TAX INCOME PER PUPIL PRODUCED BY DIFFERENT TAX RATES PROPERTY TAX BASES TAX RATES PER PUPIL $ 1.50 $3.00 $4.50 $ 10,000 $ 150 $ 300 $ 450 $ 20,000 300 600 900 $ 30,000 450 900 1350 $ 40,000 600 1200 1800 $ 50,000 750 1500 2250 $ 60,000 900 1800 2700 $ 70,000 1050 2100 3150 $ 80,000 1200 2400 3600 $ 90,000 1350 2700 4050 $100,000 1500 3000 4500 The role of state funding The Illinois Constitution makes the state responsible for educating all children. The state carries out this responsibility by creating school districts and granting their boards of education a limited amount of taxing authority. For school districts that cannot generate adequate income from property taxes because of low property wealth, the state provides equalization money. If your tax base is half the size of your neighboring district s, you must pay double the tax rate to generate the same number of dollars. Is that fair to taxpayers? Or you can pay the same tax rate and generate half the dollars for your schools. Is that fair to your children? The solution is for the state of Illinois to equalize funding differences at a level necessary to sustain good schools. That would be fair both to children and taxpayers. The state also provides money to help pay for such specific programs as transportation, handicapped education, and vocational education. This aid, however, is provided to all districts without regard for differences in local property tax income. Unfortunately, state equalization money is insufficient to compensate for differences in local wealth. Only those districts with large tax bases or high tax rates can be sure of affording adequate programs. If your schools are poorly funded because property wealth in your district is low compared to the rest of the state, you have few options for correcting the situation. Many communities try to attract new business and industry in order to build a stronger property tax base to support schools and other public services. But the fact remains that the state is shirking its obligation to your community its obligation to see that schools are adequately funded. What s more, the state s financial contributions to schools have become increasingly inadequate over the past decade. A number of factors have come together to create this situation: 1) The pace of economic growth in Illinois has varied markedly from north to south. Property values and personal income have advanced rapidly in the counties around Chicago, while large regions elsewhere in the state have languished. Thus, the gap between wealthy schools and poor schools Illinois Association of School Boards Playing Fair with the Children of Illinois 5

grows ever wider, making it increasingly expensive for state government to make up the difference. 2) State funding for schools has not matched the commitment to public aid, including Medicaid, public employee pension plans and other state services. Between 1987 and 2010, state spending for elementary and secondary education grew from $3.6 billion to $9.9 billion. Spending declined to $9.7 billion in FY 2014, but increased to $10.1 billion in FY 2017, fully funding the per pupil foundation level of $6,119. 3) Our increasingly technological world places greater demands on our workforce and on our schools. Put simply, people must be better educated today in order to find decent employment, and schools are being asked to instill more knowledge in more people than ever before. A good education today costs more than it used to, and society can no longer afford large numbers of poorly educated citizens. What can you do? What can you do to overcome these problems and see that the children in your community have access to schools that can give them a decent start in life? There is no easy answer. But if you believe the well being of our state and nation depends on adequate schools, then you might conclude that the state should tax to the extent necessary to provide them. Obviously, some communities can support their schools with little or no help. If your community is one that cannot, you may want to encourage citizen support for more state funding for schools, including additional state taxes to provide that funding. Additional copies of this publication are available to individuals or groups interested in Illinois education. Write: IASB Publications, 2921 Baker Drive, Springfield, Illinois 62703-5929; or call: 217/528-9688, ext. 1108; or download from http://www.iasb. com/pdf/playingfair.pdf October 2016 www.iasb.com Illinois Association of School Boards Playing Fair with the Children of Illinois 6