The Economic and Community Impact of Downsizing Postal Sorting Operations in Tucson, Arizona. A Fiscal Policy Institute Report

Similar documents
The Economic and Community Impact of Downsizing Postal Sorting Operations in New Orleans

Economic Impact of the September 11 World Trade Center Attack

States with Minimum Wages above the Federal Level have had Faster Small Business and Retail Job Growth

THE ECONOMIC IMPACT OF THE MINING INDUSTRY ON THE STATE OF ARIZONA 2012

New York s minimum wage increases: Good for the state s workers, good for the economy. A Fiscal Policy Institute Report January 22, 2007

PRINEVILLE DATA CENTER

VII. DIRECT, INDIRECT, AND INDUCED ECONOMIC IMPACTS OF UC SAN DIEGO

Public Relations Agencies in Los Angeles County

THE ECONOMIC IMPACT OF THE BEER INDUSTRY IN SOUTH CAROLINA

A Habitat for Humanity East Bay/Silicon Valley Study Written in collaboration with. Building More Than Houses

THE ECONOMIC IMPACT OF

The economic impact of Normandale Community College

World Trade Center Job Impacts Take a Heavy Toll on Low-Wage Workers

THE ECONOMIC IMPACT OF SUCCESSFUL COMMERCIAL FIRE INTERVENTIONS PHOENIX FIRE DEPARTMENT JUNE AUGUST, 2012

THE ECONOMIC IMPACT OF AEROSPACE AND DEFENSE FIRMS ON THE STATE OF ARIZONA

Date 1/2/2014. Prepared for. Virginia Land Investments Patterson Ave., Suite 200 Richmond, VA Cleveland, Ohio. Richmond, Virginia

Impacts of Government Jobs in Lake County Oregon

Economic Impact of the Queen of Peace Hospital and Related Health Sectors of Scott County

The Economic Impact of One WVU Home Football Game on the Monongalia County Economy. Dr. Christiadi Demographer

Agricultural ECONOMICS. The Use of Multipliers in Economic Impact Estimates

Economic Contribution of Telecommunication Companies Serving Greater Minnesota

The Economic and Fiscal Cost of Employer Fraud in the New York City Construction Industry. A Fiscal Policy Institute Report

Economic Impact Report

2012 The Economic Role of Oklahoma s Child Care Industry

A Lee County Economic Impact Study Prepared for

Immigrant Workers and the Minimum Wage in New York City

A REPORT OF THE ECONOMIC IMPACT OF ABC CORPORATION IN AUSTIN, TEXAS

Economic Impacts of Utah Valley University

THE ECONOMIC IMPACTS OF IMMIGRATION ON U.S. DAIRY FARMS

Tucson International Airport Economic Impact Study 2012

billion paid to private sector workers during Focus on Meeting and Convention Segment. The convention and

planning market analysis & site location services Economic Impact Analysis:

Regional Economic Impact Analysis

The Economic Impact of Texas State University-San Marcos

Economic and Fiscal Impacts of the New Mexico Film Production Tax Credit

Economic Consequences of Building the Black Hills Energy Power Plant in Pueblo County with a Project Labor Agreement

The economic impact of Inver Hills Community College

The Economic Impact of Tourism in New York Calendar Year Catskills Focus

Economic Impact of Trade & Consumer Shows

The economic impact of Minnesota State Colleges and Universities

National Center for Rural Health Works

ECONOMIC EMERGENCY PROGRAM St. Cloud Printing Plant Closure

THE INVISIBLE ENGINE:

Economic Impact of Redeveloping The World Trade Center Site: New York City, New York State, And the New York-New Jersey Area

The Economic Impact of Destin Tourism on Okaloosa County

The Economic Impact of Tourism in New York Calendar Year Central New York Focus

Economic Impact of The Charleston International Airport Complex

The Economic Impacts of Angelo State University

The local economic impact of Bemidji State University

September An Analysis of the Impacts of MIPS Program Spending and the Commercialization of MIPS Funded Projects on the State of Maryland

Military Spending and Jobs in Massachusetts

Economic Impact of Proposed Tax and Spending Reductions in Kansas Final Report Prepared by: John D. Wong, J.D., Ph.D.

The Contributions of the Film & Video Production Industries to Oregon s Economy in 2005

Prepared for: The Northeast Ohio Regional Sewer District. Prepared by: Ziona Austrian, Ph.D. Candice Clouse, M.S. Iryna Lendel, Ph.D.

2013 Cape Breton Celtic Classic Sydney, Nova Scotia

IHS Study on the Economic Impact of Proposed Restrictions on Tax Exempt Bonds for Nonprofit Organizations

FULL COST METHODOLOGY MODEL

KING COLLEGE SCHOOL OF BUSINESS KING COLLEGE REGIONAL ECONOMIC STUDIES (KCRES) KCRES PAPER NO. 4, May 2012

Estimated Economic Impact of Gulf Oil Spill on Virginia s Oyster Industry July 2010

Sweetbriar Barrington, RI

The Economic Contribution of Arizona s Regulated Medical Marijuana Dispensary Industry. Timothy D. Hogan, Ph.D. March 19, 2013

SUMMARY OF ECONOMIC IMPACT ANALYSIS AND IMPACT REVIEW

THE PROJECTED ECONOMIC AND FISCAL IMPACTS OF A TENNESSEE HISTORIC REHABILITATION INVESTMENT INCENTIVE

The Nuclear Facility's Economic Impact

Eli Lilly. and Company. in Indiana

The Economic Benefits of Oil and Natural Gas Production: An Analysis of Effects on the United States and Major Energy Producing States

United States

The Economic Impact of Texas State University

NOV The ECONOMIC VALUE of IDAHO PUBLIC COLLEGES & UNIVERSITIES. Main Report. Analysis of the Economic Impact & Return on Investment of Education

Economic and Fiscal Impact Analysis Facebook s Forest City Data Center

The economic impact of Saint Paul College

The Economic Impacts of Business Energy Tax Credit Supported Manufacturing in Oregon 2012 Update

CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION FOR A NEW PUBLIC WATER SYSTEM

Economic Impact of Proposed Tax and Spending Reductions in Kansas

Women Business Owners Create Jobs and Income - A Review

The Economic Impact of the Health Sector on the Economy of Dallas County, Iowa a. Daniel Otto and Georgeanne Artz b

2009 Economic Impact Report

Retirement Readiness in New York City: Trends in Plan Sponsorship, Participation and Income Security

Prepared for Prepared by

An Overview of Job Quality and Discretionary Economic Development Subsidies in New York City

The Price of Prisons Alabama

The Economic Situation Of New York City s Health and Human Services and Cultural Nonprofit Organizations

The Economic Contribution of the Oil and Gas Industry In Kern County

December 6, Dear Mr. Speaker and Honorable Members of the Standing Committee:

VAT guide should I register for VAT?

Do Tax Increases in New York City Cause a Loss of Jobs? A Review of the Evidence

Economic Impacts of Extending Health Care Coverage in Florida

The economic impact of Dakota County Technical College

The Economic Contributions of U.S. Mining (2012)

Through Recession and Recovery: Economic and Fiscal Impacts of Capital and Operating Spending by Dallas Area Rapid Transit

Economic Impacts of Affordable Housing on New York State s Economy

Do Tax Increases in New York City Cause a Loss of Jobs? A Review of the Evidence

Tryon Palace. 1. Describe the scope of the site, including any parts run by the Friends or Foundation.

The Economic Impact of Technical College System of Georgia Institutions on their Service Delivery Areas Economies in FY 2012

The Economic and Programmatic Impacts of the Maryland Technology Development Corporation on the Maryland Economy

The Consequences of Legalization Versus Mass Deportation in Colorado. Findings and Methodology. Dr. Raúl Hinojosa-Ojeda August 2012

Economic and Fiscal Impact Analysis of Proposed Motion Picture Tax Credit (SB 1409)

Transportation Infrastructure Investment: Macroeconomic and Industry Contribution of the Federal Highway and Mass Transit Program

Employment Impacts for Proposed Bay Delta Water Conveyance Tunnel Options

The labor market. National and local labor markets. Internal labor markets. Primary and secondary labor markets. Labor force and unemployment

Transcription:

The Economic and Community Impact of Downsizing Postal Sorting Operations in Tucson, Arizona A Fiscal Policy Institute Report www.fiscalpolicy.org November 10, 2014

The Economic and Community Impact of Downsizing Postal Sorting Operations in Tucson, Arizona This report was prepared by the Fiscal Policy Institute at the request of the American Postal Workers Union. This analysis was prepared by Brent Kramer, PhD, senior economist, and James A. Parrott, PhD, deputy director and chief economist. About the Fiscal Policy Institute The Fiscal Policy Institute (FPI) is an independent, nonpartisan, nonprofit research and education organization committed to improving policies and practices that better the economic and social conditions of all New Yorkers. FPI has prepared numerous reports on leading sectors of the economy, and analyses of economic and labor market trends. FPI also regularly prepares briefings on the New York State and New York City budgets, and analyzes the economic contributions of immigrants. Founded in 1991, FPI maintains offices in New York City and Latham, New York. www.fiscalpolicy.org One Lear Jet Lane, Latham, NY 12110 518-786-3156 11 Park Place, Suite 701, New York, NY 10007 212-721-5624

1 Executive Summary As part of a drastic nationwide consolidation plan that will further increase mail delivery times the United States Postal Service (USPS) is proposing to downsize sorting operations by closing the mail processing center in Tucson, AZ, and consolidate these operations at the Phoenix processing and distribution facility, 112 miles away. The move involves a substantial reduction in the number of middle-income paying postal jobs. The Postal Service estimates that the consolidation will involve first-year transition costs of $1.5 million, after which there would be $14.1 million in net annual savings. Over 90 percent of the annual net savings would come from eliminating a net of 148 postal employee and managerial positions. Savings for the Postal Service comes at a dear economic and individual cost for the Tucson and Pima County community where sorting operations are currently handled. The consolidation involves the loss of 320 good-paying jobs at the Tucson mail processing and distribution center that have average pay of $54,000 (non-managerial), twice the $26,400 median annual earnings for Pima County residents. Including the multiplier impact of reduced business and consumer spending, a total of 518 jobs will be lost in Pima County. The total labor incomes associated with these jobs amount to over $32 million, more than twice the annual savings advertised by the Postal Service as a result of the proposed consolidation. Displaced postal workers will face a daunting task in finding alternative employment in and around Tucson at comparable pay and benefits. Postal consolidation further chips away at the critical base of solid middle-class jobs in Tucson. Tucson-area businesses will lose customers and $3.8 million dollars in business income as a result of eliminating the sorting operation at the Tucson postal facility. Despite the transfer of some postal positions from Tucson to Phoenix, the net impact of the proposed consolidation will result in a loss of 229 jobs and nearly $15 million in labor income in Arizona overall. The USPS figures on savings do not account for adverse employment and economic impacts on Arizona or the lost tax revenues to the federal and local governments. The net loss in economic output in the state will exceed $21 million and involve the loss of $1.2 million in business income. The Tucson-Phoenix consolidation plan will reduce federal payroll and income taxes by $3.4 million and cost Arizona $330,000 in net state and local tax revenue. At the end of the day, the proposed consolidation offers illusory savings. The adverse economic impact on the Tucson area will be devastating, including the loss of 320 middle class postal jobs, and the positive impact on the Phoenix area is not sufficient to prevent a substantial net negative employment, economic and fiscal loss in Arizona.

2 Introduction As part of a far-reaching nationwide consolidation plan that will further increase mail delivery times, the United States Postal Service (USPS) is proposing to close the Tucson AZ P&DF mail processing center in Tucson, Arizona, that currently collects and distributes mail throughout southeastern Arizona. 1 The Postal Service is proposing to consolidate those operations into the Phoenix, Arizona processing and distribution facility, 112 miles away. The Postal Service estimates that the consolidation will involve first-year transition costs of $1.5 million, after which there would be $14.1 million in net annual savings. Over 90 percent of the annual net savings would come from eliminating a net of 148 postal employee and managerial positions. The Fiscal Policy Institute (FPI) was asked to conduct an economic and fiscal impact analysis of the proposed consolidation. FPI used the IMPLAN regional economic input-output model (Version 3.0, with 2012 data) to conduct this analysis. 2 In conducting its analysis, FPI relied on the 2012 Area Mail Processing (AMP) studies prepared by the USPS. FPI also relied on other government data on local economic conditions. Examining the adverse economic impact on the Tucson community Savings for the Postal Service comes at a dear economic and individual cost for the Tucson and the Pima County, Arizona community where the current facility is located. 1 A recent Government Accountability office (GAO) report noted the connection between the USPS lengthening delivery time standards for some First-Class Mail and Periodicals from 1-day to 2-days and an earlier round of facility consolidations. The report noted that USPS plans for more processing consolidations to take effect in 2015 could further increase delivery times. Government Accountability Office, Information on Recent Changes to Delivery Standards, Operations, and Performance, GAO-14-828R, Sept. 25, 2014. Publicly released Oct. 27, 2014. 2 The IMPLAN regional input-output model is one of the most widely used in the United States, and is structured to measure economic impacts on a state or county level. Originally developed for the federal government, the IMPLAN model is based on inter-industry linkages and reveals the industries supplying intermediate goods and services and the value of the intermediate or indirect demand needed in the production of the final demand for the industry studied. The input-output model also estimates the induced demand generated by the earnings of those engaged in direct or indirect production. Induced demand is based on generalized patterns of consumer expenditures. Total economic impacts include direct, indirect, and induced effects.

3 In proposing to consolidate postal operations in Phoenix, the Postal Service is planning to eliminate 311 postal jobs in Tucson. See Table 1. The non-managerial postal jobs to be eliminated average $54,000 a year in salary, over twice the $26,400 median annual earnings for all those employed in Pima County. 3 When health insurance and other fringe benefits are added in, labor compensation averages $81,800 per worker for the jobs the Postal Service wants to eliminate in Tucson. See Chart 1. Table 1 Postal jobs lost in Tucson Postal clerks & mail handlers -212 Postal maintenance & other jobs -76 Supervisors & managerial employees -23 Total direct USPS employees -311 Contract mail truckers -9 TOTAL direct employees -320 Source: Fiscal Policy Institute analysis based on USPS AMP report (projected changes in employment and mail service), February 2012. The USPS proposal specifies only total gains and losses for contract trucking. We used the IMPLAN input-output model to estimate the effects of these changes in trucking volume on employment. In addition to the loss of 311 good-paying Postal Service jobs, the consolidation will cause the Tucson area to lose an estimated 207 other jobs in trucking and other industries that support postal operations, and in jobs that provide consumer goods and services (such as groceries, car repair services, or retail goods) to the workers employed by the Post Office or in supplier industries. The middle class earnings of a postal worker often make possible homeownership, and support for one s family. 3 According to the American Community Survey for years 2008-2012, median annual earnings for all those employed in Pima County were $26,390 (in 2012 constant dollars). The median earnings for male full-time employees were $43,900, and the median for full-time women workers was $34,500.

4 Thus, Pima County will lose an estimated total of 518 jobs with over $32 million in labor income. This amount alone is more than twice the annual savings advertised by the Postal Service as a result of the proposed consolidation. See Table 2 for these impacts. Chart 1 Postal wages twice the median for all Pima County workers $60,000 $53,200 $50,000 $40,000 $30,000 $26,390 $20,000 $10,000 $0 median pay, all workers in Pima County, 2008-2012* average pay, full-time Postal Clerks, 2012 Median pay from American Community Survey 2008-2012 (http://factfinder2.census.gov); average postal worker pay from the American Postal Workers Union Eliminating this much in annual labor income in a small area also will have a profoundly negative effect on Pima County businesses. They will lose customers and some will be forced to reduce their own employment as a result. Local businesses will lose an estimated $49 million in sales, and $3.8 million in business income, plus $915,000 in proprietors earnings. Half ($2.4 million) of this lost business income would be felt in the real estate industry, with substantial impacts also occurring in the banking, trucking, restaurant, utilities, finance, and health care industries. See the Appendix for detailed business impacts in Pima County. Local government will also experience a loss of an estimated $915,000 in property and sales taxes associated with the closing of the Tucson facility.

5 Table 2 Impact of proposed consolidation on Pima County (Tucson), Arizona Direct jobs lost -320 Total jobs lost -518 Direct labor income lost -$25,897,674 Total labor income lost -$32,293,196 Total business income lost -$3,781,307 Local economic loss -$48,960,009 Local taxes lost -$915,419 Source: Fiscal Policy Institute analysis based on USPS AMP report (projected changes in employment and mail service), February 2012. In this table, business income includes corporate profits, rents, and dividends. Proprietors income is included with labor income. The USPS proposals specify only total gains and losses for contract trucking. We used the IMPLAN input-output models to estimate the effects of these changes in trucking volume on employment, labor income, etc. Examining the positive economic impact on the Phoenix metropolitan area To accommodate the additional mail processing that will be transferred from Tucson, there will be 160 new clerks, mail handlers, and maintenance staff at Phoenix, plus three management positions. Contracts for mail trucking to and from the facility will be expanded by $466,000 per year, which suggests an increase of three direct jobs in that industry and an increase of $180,000 in trucking employee earnings. Including the additional postal jobs and trucking jobs, there would be a $12.7 million increase in direct labor income. The 166 direct postal and trucking jobs would lead to an estimated total of 289 new jobs in the Phoenix region 4, with a total labor income gain of $17.3 million. The local economy would gain an estimated $27.5 million a year in sales as a result of the transfer of operations, and the two-county region (Maricopa + Pinal) would gain an estimated $353,000 a year in local sales and property taxes. 4 Metro Phoenix is Maricopa and Pinal Counties.

6 The net economic and fiscal impacts of the consolidation Table 3 provides the net impact of the Tucson job reductions and the consolidation proposed for the Phoenix facility. Despite the transfer of some postal positions from Tucson to Phoenix, the net impact of the proposed consolidation will result in a loss of 229 jobs and nearly $15 million in labor income in Arizona overall. Altogether, the net total loss of output to the Arizona economy would be an estimated $21.4 million. This would be associated with a net decline in state and local taxes of $330,000 and the loss of $3.4 million in federal individual income and payroll taxes. Table 3 Note: The net positive state tax impact result is due to a much higher sales tax impact per dollar of labor income in the two-county Phoenix region than in Pima County (presumably because more of people s spending stays within the larger region the population of the Phoenix metro area is more than four times as great as the Tucson area population), so sales taxes from the added jobs in metro Phoenix outweigh those lost in Tucson. The county portions of sales tax are minimal. Source: Fiscal Policy Institute analysis based on USPS AMP report (projected changes in employment and mail service), February 2012. Business income includes rents, dividends, and corporate profits. Proprietors income is included with labor income. The USPS proposals specify only total gains and losses for contract trucking. We used the IMPLAN input-output models to estimate the effects of these changes in trucking volume on employment, labor income, etc.

7 Conclusion The USPS figures on savings do not account for the substantial adverse employment and economic impacts on Arizona or the lost tax revenues to the federal, or state and local governments. Looking from the point of view of the Arizona economy, the Postal Service s projected $14.1 million a year in cost savings comes at the expense of an estimated $21.4 million in lost economic activity. Arizona would lose a net of 148 good-paying postal jobs and a total of 229 jobs overall. The proposed consolidation involves a net of nearly $15 million in lost labor income and $1.2 million in lost business income. In addition, there would also be a net loss in local and state taxes of over $330,000, and $3.4 million in lost federal income and payroll taxes. More important, however, than the net impact overall is the fact that Tucson would lose 320 solid middle-class jobs providing decent health, retirement and other fringe benefits. In today s tough economic environment, such jobs are virtually impossible to replace. While the Phoenix region will gain some offsetting jobs, and some of the displaced postal workers will be reassigned locally, there will still be a net decline of 148 postal jobs and a total loss of 229 jobs statewide. However, Pima County alone will lose a total of over 500 jobs, $32.3 million in total labor income, $3.8 million in business income, and nearly $49 million in total economic activity, along with over $900,000 in lost local sales and property taxes.

8 Appendix Table The top industries in Pima County losing total business income* Real estate -$2,431,240 Banking -$394,965 Trucking -$191,037 Food services and drinking places -$150,291 Electric utilities -$128,164 Finance -$126,187 Health care -$203,582 Wholesale trade -$72,724 Losses in these eight industries -$3,698,189 All other industries -$1,003,937 Total business losses -$4,702,127 *In this table, business income includes proprietors income, as well as corporate profits, rents, and dividends. Source: Fiscal Policy Institute analysis using IMPLAN.