Corporate Political Participation Policy Canada and the U.S. (Adopted: November 10, 2010)

Similar documents
SCHEDULE A ACCREDITED INVESTOR STATUS CERTIFICATE

Atlantic Provinces 71 COMMUNITIES

Securities Act, R.S.A., 2000, c.s-4, subsections 75(1), 110(1) and 144(1). Citation: CH2M Hill Companies, Ltd. et al, 2004 ABASC 1198 Date:

4.0 Health Expenditure in the Provinces and Territories

CAMPAIGN FINANCE AND BALLOT MEASURE GUIDE

52ND LEGISLATURE - STATE OF NEW MEXICO - SECOND SESSION, 2016

Municipal Lobbying Ordinance

Political Funds and Credit Card Transaction Disbursements

CAMPAIGN FINANCE GUIDE

Bill C-27: First Nations Financial Transparency Act

Day-to-Day Banking. Opening a Personal Deposit Account or Cashing a Federal Government Cheque at Scotiabank. Cheque Holding Policy

Public Accounting Rights for Certified General Accountants in Canada. Issue Brief

Employment termination and group insurance coverage

MULTILATERAL INSTRUMENT PROFICIENCY REQUIREMENTS FOR REGISTRANTS HOLDING THEMSELVES OUT AS PROVIDING FINANCIAL PLANNING AND SIMILAR ADVICE

MUTUAL FUND DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO MFDA RULE (SEGREGATION OF CLIENT PROPERTY CASH)

AGREEMENT IN PRINCIPLE Labour Mobility Chapter of the Agreement on Internal Trade/Teaching Profession

Public Act No

How the practice of medicine is regulated in Canada

INVESTORS RIGHTS. a Schedule III bank, meaning an authorized foreign bank named in Schedule III of the Bank Act (Canada);

Open Government and Information Management. Roy Wiseman Executive Director, MISA/ASIM Canada CIO (Retired), Region of Peel

Canadian Provincial and Territorial Early Hearing Detection and Intervention. (EHDI) Programs: PROGRESS REPORT

AN INTRO TO. Privacy Laws. An introductory guide to Canadian Privacy Laws and how to be in compliance. Laura Brown

Spending on Postsecondary. of Education, Fact Sheet. Education Indicators in Canada. June 2011

PROVINCIAL/TERRITORIAL COUNCIL Of MINISTERS OF SECURITIES REGULATION (Council) ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT January 2013 to December 2013

2008 BCSECCOM 143. Applicable British Columbia Provisions National Instrument Mutual Fund Sales Practices, s. 5.4(1), 9.1

Access to Basic Banking Services

Audit of Third Party Advertising in a Federal Election PURSUANT TO THE CANADA ELECTIONS ACT

National Instrument The Early Warning System and Related Take-Over Bid and Insider Reporting Issues. Table of Contents

Your New Banking Rights. What you should know about access to basic banking services

Investment Dealers Association of Canada

Selected Annotated Bibliography Personal Health Information, Privacy and Access

Review of Section 38 (Benefits), Workers Compensation Act

Additional Tables, Youth Smoking Survey

Report of the CMEC Quality Assurance Subcommittee

SCOTIA DEALER ADVANTAGE RETAIL FINANCING PROGRAM DEALER AGREEMENT

TORONTO MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTER 140, LOBBYING. Chapter 140 LOBBYING. ARTICLE I General Restriction on application (persons and organizations).

APPLICATION FOR PROFESSIONAL AND COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY INSURANCE FOR MEMBERS OF THE CANADIAN ASSOCIATION OF OPTOMETRISTS

CHAPTER 51. BE IT ENACTED by the Senate and General Assembly of the State of New Jersey:

Comments on Illegal Insider Trading in Canada: Recommendations on Prevention, Detection and Deterrence Report (the Insider Trading Report )

Council Meeting Date: June 25, 2013 Agenda Item #: 9.2

1.1.3 Professional Conduct and Ethics

EXHIBIT D. made aware of the nature and extent of the coverage available to them; and

Citation: TD Asset Management Inc. et al, 2005 ABASC 436 Date:

Applicable Legislative Provisions Securities Act, R.S.N.S. 1989, c. 418, as amended, sections 31, 58 and 79. IN THE MATTER OF

Income tax rates for Canadian-controlled private corporations (CCPCs)

The Canadian Psychological Association and The Council of Provincial Associations of Psychologists

Please note that this paper is a legislative review only and does not account for interpretations of the law by the courts.

Privacy Law in Canada

SUBSCRIPTION AGREEMENT (for use by registered dealers)

University tuition fees, 2014/2015 Released at 8:30 a.m. Eastern time in The Daily, Thursday, September 11, 2014

Control and sale of alcoholic beverages, for the year ending March 31, 2012 Released at 8:30 a.m. Eastern time in The Daily, Thursday, April 11, 2013

Consultation Document Automobile Insurance Reform

CANADA MEDIA FUND. Industry Working Group. Date: October 22, 2012

AND IN THE MATTER OF THE MUTUAL RELIANCE REVIEW SYSTEM FOR EXEMPTIVE RELIEF APPLICATIONS AND IN THE MATTER OF TD ASSET MANAGEMENT INC.

Running for Municipal Office in Alberta

PHILADELPHIA BOARD OF ETHICS REGULATION NO. 1 CAMPAIGN FINANCE. Table of Contents

Canada-U.S. Estate Planning for the Cross-Border Executive

Hull McGuire PC Attorneys

California Fair Political Practices Commission Frequently Asked Questions: Campaign Activity

PTA -- Taking Positions on Ballot Measures: School Bonds, Levies, Initiatives and Referenda

taxation Current to June 20, 2013 What s Inside

Mortgage Loan Insurance Business Supplement

Rules and Regulations. The Co-operators $57,000 Contest Giveaway, 2015

Internationally Educated Medical Radiation Technologists APPLICATION for ASSESSMENT

You made record profits in How are you giving back to communities? 9,000+ donated to. United Way

Resolving Customer Complaints

FY17 Operating Budget Testimony Michael H. Reed, Esquire, Chairman Philadelphia Board of Ethics Prepared for City Council April, 2016

Legal Concerns In Setting Up A Ballot Measure Committee February 2014

Control and sale of alcoholic beverages, for the year ending March 31, 2013 Released at 8:30 a.m. Eastern time in The Daily, Thursday, April 10, 2014

Catalogue no X General Social Survey: Selected Tables on Social Engagement

A GUIDE TO CAMPAIGN DISCLOSURE

Instructions NDEB Equivalency Process

INCORPORATING YOUR PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE

Our Employees. CIBC s vision, mission and values are at the centre of our commitment to create an environment where all of our employees can excel.

AND IN THE MATTER OF THE MUTUAL RELIANCE REVIEW SYSTEM FOR EXEMPTIVE RELIEF APPLICATIONS AND IN THE MATTER OF COMMERCE ONE, INC.

Headnote. Applicable Ontario Statutory Provisions. Securities Act, R.S.O. 1990, c.s.5, as am. s. 83.

Regulation of Paramedics and Emergency Medical Attendants: A Jurisdictional Review

(CLICK ON JURISDICTION FOR ADDENDUM) FEDERAL LIRA ALBERTA LIRA BRITISH COLUMBIA LRRSP MANITOBA LIRA NEWFOUNDLAND AND LABRADOR LIRA NOVA SCOTIA LIRA

Analytical Bulletin Certified and Non-Certified Specialists: Understanding the Numbers

Voter Contact Registry

April 12, Attention:

Volunteer Activity Federal Election Commission Published in October 2009

Internet Connectivity Among Aboriginal Communities in Canada

If you have experience and academic. The Applied Science and Engineering Technology Professions in Canada MECHANICAL TECHNOLOGY

THE OFFERING MEMORANDUM UNDER ONTARIO SECURITIES LAW By: Daniel A. Coderre Soloway Wright LLP

PARAMETERS OF THE PERSONAL INCOME TAX SYSTEM FOR November 2014

Parents and employers must ensure

çbev~rly~rly CITY OF BEVERLY HILLS STAFF REPORT

KEY ELEMENTS PSYCHOLOGIST REGULATIONS

Canadian Securities Regulatory Requirements applicable to NonResident Broker-Dealers, Advisers. and Investment Fund Managers

North Georgia Community Foundation FUNDRAISING ACTIVITY POLICY

Re: Industry Canada Consultation on the Canada Business Corporations Act (the Consultation )

Tim Horton Children s Foundation, Inc.

March 23, The Honourable Carolyn Bolivar-Getson Minister of Environment and Labour P.O. Box 697 HALIFAX, NS B3J 2T8.

Dear Reader: Presented herewith is the Annual Gaming Report pursuant to Section 56 of the Gaming Control Act for the year ending March 31, 2013.

The Deputy Minister of Community Services Harvey Brooks

Date: December 2,2013 File: /2013-Vol Fire Chief 01 Anne Stevens Senior Manager, Community Safety Policy and Programs

TABLE OF CONTENTS PART 1 DEFINITIONS AND INTERPRETATION. 1.1 Definitions. 1.2 Interpretation PART 2 ELECTRONIC FILING REQUIREMENTS

Transcription:

Corporate Political Participation Policy Canada and the U.S. (Adopted: November 10, 2010) has a well-established history of community involvement. Consistent with such involvement, this policy has been adopted to provide transparency about the way in which Tim Hortons participates in public policy matters that have the potential to impact the operation of the business of and the communities in which the business is located. believes that public policy development requires the participation of all members of society. The exchange of relevant information, experiences and practices facilitates a constructive dialogue with public decision makers. This policy serves the interests of and its franchisees by educating elected and public officials about its business, while providing important information to its franchisees, customers, shareholders and the public at large. Conducting business in compliance with applicable laws concerning accountability of political contributions (which may include money and/or goods and services in-kind) is integral to the core values of. will not pressure or coerce any employee, franchisee, or other stakeholder in any manner to contribute to or support any candidate, office holder, or proposition or take any retaliatory action against employees, franchisees, or other stakeholders who do not. Corporate Contributions General Principles. may from time to time make contributions in support of national, state, provincial, or local issue advocacy efforts in such cases where the issues are deemed aligned with company interests and objectives. Contributions will not be provided by in anticipation of, in recognition of, or in return for an official act. is committed to conducting business ethically, with integrity, and in accordance with the law. Part of that commitment includes compliance with rules, regulations, and standards governing our interaction with the government, including political contributions and expenditures. Set forth on Exhibit A are the Canadian and U.S. regulatory frameworks generally applicable, as updated from time to time; these are not intended as exhaustive commentary on all applicable law. Given the unique aspects of the Canadian and U.S. regulatory regimes governing political participation, the nature in which may participate in these two countries differs. Prior written approval must be obtained from the Senior Vice President, Corporate Affairs before there can be any participation or contribution made by or on behalf of Tim Hortons in order to maintain compliance with regulatory requirements and this policy. Canada. In Canada, cannot make corporate donations to federal political parties or candidates but may support provincial and municipal political activities. Activities that are permissible to be conducted on behalf of may include sponsoring and attending political fundraising activities, donating to local candidates, and providing beverages, baked goods, and gift cards to campaign volunteers and/or political staff. Tim Hortons encourages its franchisees to take an active part in local, political activities with primary focus on building local relationships and educating elected officials on various aspects of their businesses in the communities in which they serve. Monetary political contributions by franchisees may not be made on behalf of, however, as described below. Donations

Page 2 of food and paper products by franchisees in support of local, community-building activities is permissible. In general, to the extent practical, should make political expenditures in Canada directly rather than through third party organizations. Participation in third party organizations is not prohibited, however, and may be undertaken when appropriate and in furtherance of Tim Hortons business interests. United States. In the U.S., may participate in certain federal or state industry trade associations (such as the National Restaurant Association), may sponsor a political action committee, may provide support for issue organizations or firms lobbying for particular business issues, as well as support ballot issue committees, but will not engage in independent expenditures that directly advocate for the election or defeat of particular candidates. Other than the foregoing methods for participating in the U.S. political process, corporate funds and property will not be used in support of political activities in the U.S. Contributions by Franchisees and/or Employees on Their Own Behalf Although employees, franchisees, and employees of franchisees are encouraged to take an active role in their communities and to participate in the political process during non-work hours to the extent they decide is appropriate, any such participation may not be purported to be activity conducted on behalf of and will not involve any payment or reimbursement by Tim Hortons for costs incurred or time spent. corporate resources must not be utilized in furtherance of individual political activities. In addition, the giving of money, gifts, products or services to government officials by employees, franchisees or others in exchange for official action is strictly prohibited. Disclosure When making any form of political contribution, will comply with all requirements regarding public disclosure of such contributions. Policy Oversight and Compliance This policy has been recommended by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and approved by of the Board of Directors of. The Nominating Committee reviews this policy annually and also receives an annual report on all political expenditures over the prior fiscal year.

Page 3 Exhibit A Regulatory framework Canada Federal. Federal legislation prohibits corporations from making political contributions to federal political parties and candidates for federal office. Provincial. Applicable provincial laws relating to public policy matters are not uniform and should be considered in each case. For example, legislation in Ontario permits any person or corporation to make political contributions to provincial parties and candidates for provincial office. In a non-election year, any person or corporation may contribute up to $9,300 to any provincial party and up to $1,240 to any constituency association. The total contribution to all constituency associations of the same party must not exceed $6,200. This means a person or corporation may contribute an annual maximum of $15,500 to each registered party and its constituency associations. During an election period, any person or corporation may make additional contributions up to $9,300 to provincial parties and up to $1,240 to any candidate so long as the total contribution to all candidates of the same party does not exceed $6,200. With respect to disclosure, a donor making a contribution in Ontario of less than $100 has the option to declare it not to be a contribution, however, amounts contributed to any one party, constituency association, candidate or leadership contestant in excess of that amount will be made public. Other provinces have disclosure limits ranging from $100 to $375. Refer to the attached Exhibit A1 for provincial disclosure requirements as of the date of this policy. Municipal. Generally any person or corporation may make a political contribution to a candidate in a municipal election. Pursuant to the Municipal Elections Act, 1996, total contributions to any one candidate may not exceed $750 and contributions to all candidates within a single council or school board jurisdiction may not exceed $5,000. Corporations that are associated with one another are considered to be a single corporation for the purpose of political contributions. Special attention should be paid at the municipal level as some Canadian cities, such as Toronto, Ontario and Lethbridge, Alberta, have by-laws prohibiting contributions from corporations to political candidates. For example, City of Toronto By-law 1177-2009 provides that (i) candidates for Mayor or councillor cannot accept contributions from corporations or trade unions, (ii) contributions over $25 must be by way of cheque, money order, bank draft or credit card, (iii) contributions must be from contributor s own funds, and (iv) contributions can only be made after a candidate files nomination papers. United States General Federal Prohibitions. Corporations are prohibited from making monetary or in-kind contributions to federal candidates and committees that support or oppose federal candidates. In addition, foreign citizens and foreign corporations are prohibited from making contributions to

Page 4 federal candidates and political committees that support or oppose candidates for election (this prohibition applies to all candidate elections at the federal, state and local levels). Federal Political Action Committee. Corporations are permitted to sponsor a federal Political Action Committee ( PAC ) to make contributions to candidates and political committees. The sponsoring corporation must register its PAC with the U.S. Federal Election Commission ( FEC ), must designate a treasurer, and must submit periodic reports of contributions and expenditures to the FEC. A federal PAC sponsored by a corporation is permitted to solicit individual contributions into the PAC from the corporation s officers, employees and shareholders, who may each contribute up to $5,000 per year to the PAC. The sponsoring corporation is permitted to pay certain establishment, administration and solicitation expenses on behalf of the PAC, but all the funds used to make political contributions must come from individuals. A Federal PAC may contribute up to $5,000 per election period (primary and general) to federal candidates. Federal PACs are also authorized to make contributions to candidates in state and local elections, subject to state-specific registration and reporting requirements. Issue Organizations. Corporations may contribute corporate dollars to organizations that advocate on issues as opposed to supporting or opposing candidates for election. Issue organizations are not required to register and submit reports to the FEC, and there are no limits on the amount that corporations may contribute to issue organizations. Issue organizations are generally not required to disclose their contributors, but in some cases may do so voluntarily or may be required in certain jurisdictions or as a result of engaging in specified political activities. Independent Expenditures. As a result of a recent decision of the United State Supreme Court, corporations may now make certain independent expenditures in support of or in opposition to candidates that were previously prohibited, although independent expenditures cannot be made at the request of, or in coordination with, a candidate. For example, a corporation may fund a television advertisement directly advocating the election of a candidate in the weeks leading up to an election. There are reporting requirements for independent expenditures in some jurisdictions and additional federal and state laws regulating this activity may be forthcoming. State Provisions. Most U.S. states prohibit corporate monetary and in-kind contributions. States generally permit corporations to sponsor PACs in similar fashion to the federal requirements discussed above. For example, the State of Ohio prohibits corporate monetary and in-kind contributions to candidates. Corporations are permitted to form a state PAC sponsored by a corporation in similar fashion to the federal PAC requirements. State PACs must register and submit periodic reports with the Office of the Ohio Secretary of State. Federal PACs are permitted to register in Ohio and make contributions in Ohio in accordance with state and local contribution limits. Officers, employees, and shareholders of the sponsoring corporation may contribute $11,395.56 per year to a state PAC. State PACs may contribute up to $11,395.56 per election period (primary and general) to a statewide or legislative candidate. This limit also applies to individual contributors. States generally permit corporate contributions in support of issue campaigns and ballot issue committees. At the statewide level, these issues often concern a proposed amendment to a state s constitution or state legislation proposed by citizen initiative. At the local level, issues

Page 5 often centre on municipal and school district tax levies and zoning and land-use proposals. In some jurisdictions, such as Ohio, there is no limit on the amount corporations may contribute to ballot issue committees. However, ballot issue committees are generally subject to registration and reporting requirements similar to those required for PACs. Municipal. Municipalities and other political subdivisions of U.S. states have enacted varying campaign finance contribution limits and reporting requirements that supplement or differ in some respects from federal and state law requirements. Individual Contributions. Individuals not acting on behalf of a corporation are permitted to contribute $2,400 per election period (primary and general) to federal candidates. Individual contributors are not required to report their contributions themselves, but the candidate or political committee that receives the contribution must report the name, address, employer / occupation, and amount for each contribution received.

Page 6 Exhibit A1 Canadian Provincial Disclosure Limits Province Newfoundland and Labrador Prince Edward Island Nova Scotia New Brunswick Quebec Ontario Manitoba Saskatchewan Alberta British Columbia Public Disclosure of Contributions Records of contributions over $100 are on the Elections Newfoundland & Labrador Records of contributions over $250 are on the Elections PEI Records of contributions over $50 are on the Elections Nova Scotia Records of contributions over $100 are available in paper at Elections NB offices The province does not accept political donations Records of contributions over $100 are on the Elections Ontario Records of contributions over $250 are on the Elections Manitoba Records of contributions over $250 are publicly available in paper at Elections Saskatchewan Records of contributions over $375 are on the Elections Alberta Records of contributions over $250 are on the Elections B.C.