Case 6:16-cv MAT Document 1 Filed 04/22/16 Page 1 of 5. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Western District of New York

Similar documents
CASE 0:12-cv RHK-SER Document 1 Filed 11/02/12 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case: 1:16-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 01/22/16 Page 1 of 18 PageID #:1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

Case 1:13-cv SEB-TAB Document 1 Filed 01/02/13 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 1

Plaintiff, MICHAEL REBECK, by his attorneys, STEVENS, HINDS & WHITE, P.C., Preliminary Statement

Case 4:09-cv RCC Document 1 Filed 09/04/09 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff,

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 9 th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA

Case 4:15-cv RH-CAS Document 1 Filed 03/17/15 Page 1 of 19 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. Case No: Defendants, Steven Lecy and the City of Minneapolis, through their

Case 2:14-cv DB Document 2 Filed 09/03/14 Page 1 of 10

Case 3:14-cv HU Document 1 Filed 04/23/14 Page 1 of 12 Page ID#: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

Case 5:14-cv OLG Document 9 Filed 07/31/14 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION

Case: 1:15-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 11/04/15 Page 1 of 10 PageID #:1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 2:13-cv RBS Document 1 Filed 03/19/13 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Case 5:14-cv Document 1 Filed 07/11/14 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION

Case 3:14-cv MMD-VPC Document 12-1 Filed 02/12/14 Page 1 of 14 EXHIBIT 1

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

Case 1:14-cv ILG-JMA Document 1 Filed 05/02/14 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 1. KAREN FENNELL, JAMES JORDAN, JR. and ANTHONY SOLIS,

Case 5:14-cv IPJ Document 1 Filed 10/14/14 Page 1 of 17

Case: 1:12-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 06/04/12 Page 1 of 12 PageID #:1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS, EASTERN DIVISION

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

FIRST AMENDED CLASS ACTION AND COLLECTIVE COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND

NOTICE OF CLAIM. Claimant, -against-

COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND. of police reports in bad faith. Plaintiff claims that Defendants acted willfully, wantonly and in

How to Write a Complaint

Case 3:10-cv DRD Document 31 Filed 05/05/11 Page 1 of 9

Case 2:10-cv NBF Document 1 Filed 09/17/10 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Complaint as permitted by Case Management Order # 4 and Implementing Order PARTIES, JURISDICTION AND VENUE

Case: 1:15-cv CAB Doc #: 1 Filed: 01/08/15 1 of 10. PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

Haro was at home with his family when they saw an intruder lurking in their backyard. When

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION

Case 2:13-cv CG-WPL Document 24 Filed 10/15/13 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF HAWAII. Case No.: CV-06-00~CK-LEK

Case4:13-cv DMR Document1 Filed12/11/13 Page1 of 5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

2:13-cv BAF-MKM Doc # 1 Filed 06/24/13 Pg 1 of 14 Pg ID 1

Plaintiff, : X. Nature of the Action. 1. This is an action for breach of a settlement agreement, retaliation

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

Case 1:09-cv NT Document 1 Filed 03/02/09 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, WEST DISTRICT

Defendant, by and through his attorneys LENOIR LAW FIRM, answering the complaint of plaintiff, upon information and belief,

Case 1:10-cv Document 1 Filed 05/24/10 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

Title 5: ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES AND SERVICES

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

Case 1:14-cv Document 1 Filed 12/08/14 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS COMPLAINT

1. YOU ARE BEING SUED. The Plaintiff has started a lawsuit against you. The 2. YOU MUST REPLY WITHIN 20 DAYS TO PROTECT YOUR RIGHTS.

GRAY, L.L.C. 760 ROUTE 10 WEST, SUITE 203 WHIPPANY, NEW JERSEY PH: F: Attorneys for Plaintiff Henry Kent

Case: 1:15-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 01/21/15 Page 1 of 5 PageID #:1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT IN THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Case No.:

U ITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTER DISTRICT OF KE TUCKY AT LOUISVILLE O. FILED ELECTRO ICALLY U IVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE

Plaintiffs, Defendants. PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Plaintiff, Rebecca Weston, hereby accepts the Offer of

Case 2:12-cv JRG Document 1 Filed 11/01/12 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

Case 5:11-cv FB Document 1 Filed 09/06/11 Page 1 of 14

Case 2:13-cv JS-AKT Document 1 Filed 07/26/13 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Case No.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

Case 1:10-cv JBS -KMW Document 1 Filed 01/12/10 Page 1 of 21 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA IN THE DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN, SOUTHERN DIVISION

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA

Case 3:15-cv Document 1 Filed 10/28/15 Page 1 of 13

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF SOMEWHERE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 1:15-cv KMW Document 11 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/28/2016 Page 1 of 8 UNTIED STATE DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

JEFFERSON CIRCUIT COURT JUDGE DIVISION. MELISSA ROWE, Individually and as Mother and Next Friend of E.R

Case 1:15-cv GAO Document 1 Filed 07/23/15 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES

Case 4:14-cv A Document 1 Filed 04/10/14 Page 1 of 4 PageID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH DIVISION

USDC IN/ND case 1:15-cv JD-SLC document 1 filed 06/19/15 page 1 of 5

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION COMPLAINT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA EASTERN DIVISION ) ) )

Case 1:09-cv Document 1 Filed 12/10/09 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF GREENE COUNTY, MISSOURI DIVISION

Case 1:14-cv WGY Document 1 Filed 01/02/14 Page 1 of 6 : : : : : : : : : : :

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT THE PARTIES

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY SIXTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT STATE OF MISSOURI

- Violations of 42 U.S.C. $ Supplemental State Claims

4:15-cv RBH Date Filed 01/29/15 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 10

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

Case 2:02-cv WHA-SRW Document 1 Filed 09/17/2002 Page 1 of 5 , '\ IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

Case 3:10-cv PK Document 1 Filed 04/13/2010 Page 1 of 8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ORIGINAL COMPLAINT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA EASTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NATURE OF THE ACTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 3:14-cv AC Document 10 Filed 03/26/14 Page 1 of 14 Page ID#: 43

) Verified c-o-m-p-la-in-t- --;o~~&"-a~a~e~a6d4 0. Plaintiff, ) Demand for Jury Trial. Defendants. ) Over $25, ~)

Case 5:10-cv JCO-VMM Document 7 Filed 05/11/10 Page 1 of 18 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF

&lagistiiale JUDGE ROSEMONO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA HARRISONBURG DIVISION EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Case 3:08-cv JM-CAB Document 9 Filed 08/25/2008 Page 1 of 7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA NATURE OF THE ACTION

Case 4:15-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 08/04/15 Page 1 of 46 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS. Plaintiff, No.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN. v. Case No.: 15-cv-157 CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT

Transcription:

Case 6:16-cv-06267-MAT Document 1 Filed 04/22/16 Page 1 of 5 JENNIFER MERROW, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Western District of New York vs. Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO. RAELLE ASHLEY, TIMOTHY ROMACH, RONALD W. HARLING, PATRICK O FLYNN each in his or her official and individual capacity, and JOHN DOE, a fictitious name representing one or more deputies or employees of the Monroe County Sheriff s Department, individually and in their official capacities, the identities of whom are unknown to Plaintiff, COMPLAINT PLAINTIFF DEMANDS JURY TRIAL Defendants. Plaintiff, Jennifer Merrow, by her attorneys, Ganguly Brothers, PLLC (Anjan K. Ganguly, Esq., of counsel), as and for her Complaint against Defendants, the Monroe County Sheriff Patrick O Flynn, Monroe County Jail Superintendent Ronald W. Harling, Monroe County Sheriff s Deputies Raelle Ashley and Timothy Romach, each in his or her individual and official capacity, and John Doe, a fictitious name representing one or more deputies or employees of the Monroe County Sheriff's Office, individually and in their official capacities, the names of whom are currently unknown to Plaintiff, alleges as follows: I. JURISDICTION AND VENUE 1. This action is brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983, 1988 and the Fourth, Eighth, and Fourteenth Amendments to the Constitution of the United States. 2. This Court has subject matter jurisdiction of the action under 28 U.S.C. 1331, 1343(a)(3), (4), and the aforementioned statutory provisions.

Case 6:16-cv-06267-MAT Document 1 Filed 04/22/16 Page 2 of 5 3. This action is commenced within the limitation periods governing actions as to causes of action under 28 U.S.C. 1983 as to all Defendants. 4. Venue in this Court is proper as to all Defendants pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1391(a)(2) and (b)(2) because the events giving rise to the claims occurred within this district. II. PARTIES 5. At all times herein alleged, Plaintiff Jennifer Merrow ( Plaintiff ), was a resident of the County of Monroe, State of New York. 6. At all times herein alleged Defendant County of Monroe was and is a municipal corporation duly organized and existing under the laws of The State of New York, and located in the State of New York. 7. Upon information and belief, at all times herein alleged Defendant Monroe County Sheriff Patrick O Flynn was and is a duly elected sheriff pursuant to New York State Law, and resided or had a place of business in the County of Monroe, State of New York. 8. Upon information and belief, at all times herein alleged Ronald W. Harling was and is the Superintendant of the Monroe County Jail, and is employed by Defendant O Flynn. 9. At all times herein alleged Defendants O Flynn and/or Harling held supervisory responsibility and authority over the Monroe County Jail, employed deputies to work in said jail, and were responsible for hiring, training, supervision, and retention of said deputies. 10. Upon information and belief, at all times herein alleged, Defendant Raelle Ashley was a deputy sheriff employed by the Monroe County Sheriff and assigned to work in the Monroe County Jail. 11. Upon information and belief, at all times herein alleged, Defendant Timothy Romach was a deputy sheriff employed by the Monroe County Sheriff and assigned to work in the Monroe County Jail. 12. At all times relevant herein, all Defendants herein acted under color of state law. III. FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS

Case 6:16-cv-06267-MAT Document 1 Filed 04/22/16 Page 3 of 5 13. On December 19, 2014, at approximately 6:30 p.m. plaintiff was arrested by Rochester Police officers and transported to the Monroe County Jail for booking. 14. While at the Monroe County Jail, Plaintiff was attacked, kicked, choked, punched, thrown to the ground, maced, and subject to extreme physical restraint by Defendants Ashley, Romach, and/or Doe, and suffered serious physical injuries as a result thereof. 15. As a result of said attack, Plaintiff lost consciousness, and awoke in a holding cell or other room. While Plaintiff was unconscious, her clothes were removed by one or more of the Defendant deputies. When Plaintiff awoke, she was naked, in full view of one or more of the Defendant deputies were present at this time, including one or male deputies. 16. One or more of the Defendant deputies ordered Plaintiff to take various poses so that she could be photographed. One or more of the Defendant deputies took photographs of Plaintiff on their cell phone(s). IV. AS AND FOR A FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION: EXCESSIVE USE OF FORCE IN VIOLATION OF PLAINTIFF'S CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS 17. Plaintiff repeats and re-alleges all allegations made above as if fully set forth herein. 18. Defendants Ashley, Romach, and Doe used excessive and unnecessary force against Plaintiff in violation of Plaintiff's rights under the Fourth, Eighth, and Fourteenth Amendment. 19. The use of force by Defendants toward Plaintiff was objectively unreasonable, and /or constitutes cruel and unusual punishment. IV. AS AND FOR A SECOND CAUSE OF ACTION: SUPERVISORY LIABILITY 20. Upon information and belief, Defendant O Flynn and/or Harling and/or Doe were personally involved the above-described violations because one or all of them were: informed of these violations but failed to remedy the wrong; and/or created a policy or custom under which these unconstitutional practices occurred, or allowed the continuance

Case 6:16-cv-06267-MAT Document 1 Filed 04/22/16 Page 4 of 5 of such a policy or custom; and/or was grossly negligent in supervising subordinates who committed the wrongful acts; and/or exhibited deliberate indifference to Plaintiff s rights by failing to act on information indicating that unconstitutional acts were occurring. AS AND FOR A SECOND CAUSE OF ACTION: MONELL CLAIM AGAINST SHERIFF O FLYNN 21. Plaintiff repeats and re-alleges all allegations made above as if fully set forth herein. 22. Defendant O Flynn, in his official capacity acts as a municipal policymaker as to the operation of the Monroe County Jail. In that role, the Sheriff has de facto adopted a practice of permitting the use of excessive force and/or sexually harassing and abusing inmates, so consistent and widespread as to constitute a policy or custom of which the Sheriff is or should have been aware. To wit, over the past 10-plus years there have been numerous lawsuits filed in this Court against the Sheriff and/or his deputies alleging excessive use of force and/or sexual harassment. Currently, there are numerous lawsuits recently brought in this Court alleging sexual assault by former Monroe County Jail deputy Robert Wilson. 23. Furthermore, Defendant O Flynn in said policymaking role, has failed to provide adequate training or supervision to subordinates, including the deputies named herein, to such an extent that it amounts to deliberate indifference to the rights of those who come into contact with said deputies. IX. DAMAGES 24. Plaintiff repeats and re-alleges all allegations made above as if fully set forth herein. 25. As a direct and proximate result of the above-described unconstitutional and illegal acts of the Defendants, Plaintiff has suffered severe and lasting physical injury, physical pain and suffering, emotional and psychological pain and suffering, shame and humiliation, has incurred substantial medical and other expenses, and was prevented from carrying on her normal occupation, activities, and interests, may in the future continue to be so incapacitated.

Case 6:16-cv-06267-MAT Document 1 Filed 04/22/16 Page 5 of 5 WHEREFORE, the Plaintiff, Jennifer Merrow, demands judgment against the Defendants: A. For compensatory damages in amounts to be determined; B. For punitive damages in amounts to be determined; C. Reasonable attorneys' fees; D. Costs and disbursements of this action; E. Such other and further relief as this Court may deem just and proper. DATED: April 22, 2016 /s/ Anjan K. Ganguly Anjan K. Ganguly, Esq. Ganguly Brothers, PLLC. Attorneys for Plaintiff 2024 W. Henrietta Rd., Ste. 3D Rochester, New York 14623 (585) 232-7747 anjan@gangulylaw.com