FERTILIZER MANAGEMENT FOR GRASS AND GRASS-LEGUME MIXTURES

Similar documents
Fertility Guidelines for Hops in the Northeast Dr. Heather Darby, University of Vermont Extension Agronomist

PRODUCING WHEY SILAGE FOR GROWING

WHAT IS IN FERTILIZER OTHER THAN NUTRIENTS?

ennessee is one of the top livestock producing states in the country. Much of the livestock in Tennessee is raised by smaller-scale, parttime

Nutrient and Fertilizer Value of Dairy Manure

FERTILIZER GUIDELINES FOR AGRONOMIC CROPS IN MINNESOTA

SULFUR AND MICRONUTRIENT RESPONSES ON CORN AND SOYBEANS George Rehm Department of Soil, Water, and Climate, University of Minnesota, St.

Evaluation of Combination Phosphorus Sulfur Fertilizer Products for Corn Production

N-P-K FERTILIZERS. by M.L. Vitosh Extension Specialist, Crop and Soil Sciences

Land Application of Drilling Fluids: Landowner Considerations

Understanding the. Soil Test Report. Client and Sample Identification

Sulfur deficiency in corn Jim Camberato, Stephen Maloney, and Shaun Casteel 1 Agronomy Department, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN

Estimated Costs of Crop. Production in Iowa File A1-20 The estimated costs of corn, corn silage, Ag Decision Maker

Irrigation System Maintenance

Grain Finishing Beef: Alternative Rations, Cattle Performance and Feeding Costs for Small Feeders

Managing of Annual Winter Forages in Southwest Texas

PUTTING FORAGES TOGETHER FOR YEAR ROUND GRAZING

Agronomic and Economic Considerations on Michigan Farms

SOIL TEST LEVELS AND NUTRIENT BUDGETS IN THE WESTERN U.S.

How To Manage Alfalfa

Calcium (Ca) and magnesium (Mg) are secondary nutrients, but they are

Introduction. Introduction Nutritional Requirements. Six Major Classes of Nutrients. Water 12/1/2011. Regional Hay School -- Bolivar, MO 1

Maintaining a Healthy Lawn

Basic Parliamentary Procedure for 4-H Clubs Donna Carter, 4-H Extension Agent

The estimated costs of corn, corn silage,

Determining nutrient needs

Fertilizer. Recommendations Guide. EC750 September Cooperative Extension Service South Dakota State University U.S. Department of Agriculture

A SOIL TESTING SERVICE FOR FARMERS IN THAILAND, USING MOBILE LABORATORIES

GROUNDWATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT CONTROLS

SOIL TEST INTERPRETATIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS HANDBOOK

Determining Amounts of Fertilizer for Small Areas

Estimating Cash Rental Rates for Farmland

Advanced Soil Organic Matter Management

Fertilizer Grade and Calculations. John Peters UW Soil Science Department

Worksheet for Calculating Biosolids Application Rates in Agriculture

ENERGY IN FERTILIZER AND PESTICIDE PRODUCTION AND USE

HOW TO PROTECT YOUR WATER

Payback News. Beef Cows-The Cheapest Mineral Isn t

College of Agricultural Sciences Agricultural Research and Cooperative Extension

USING HUMIC COMPOUNDS TO IMPROVE EFFICIENCY OF FERTILISER NITROGEN

Project Pig Production Planner

NUTRIENT SPECIFICATIONS OF TURKEY WASTE MATERIAL

Agro-One Soil Analysis

Salinity Management and Soil Amendments for Southwestern Pecan Orchards

Forage Economics, page2. Production Costs

Using Bermudagrass Forage Systems to Mine Phosphorus from High Soil-Test Phosphorus Soils

SHOW STEER SELECTION. Darrell Rothlisberger Rich County Agent Utah State University Extension

Three Reasons to Broaden Your Fertigation Knowledge

Annual Winter Pastures for East Texas

Reviewed.March.2010 SHOW LAMB SELECTION. Darrell Rothlisberger Rich County Agent Utah State University Extension

Optimum soil test levels

IV. PLANT NUTRIENT ELEMENTS

Sewing Technique: Patch Pockets

Understanding ph management and plant nutrition Part 5: Choosing the best fertilizer

PHOSPHORUS, POTASSIUM, AND MINOR ELEMENT FERTILIZATION

LAB 5 - PLANT NUTRITION. Chemical Ionic forms Approximate dry Element symbol Atomic weight Absorbed by plants tissue concentration

The ABCs of Pasture Grazing

Substrate ph: Getting it Right for Your Greenhouse Crops

Grass Legume Mixtures:

What is Nitrite Toxicity? Georgia Cattleman, June 2002 John Andrae, Forage Extension Specialist

POTASSIUM. Functions of Potassium in Plants. Potassium Deficiency Symptoms

CALCIUM AND MAGNESIUM: THE SECONDARY COUSINS George Rehm, University of Minnesota

Nutrient Management for Commercial Fruit & Vegetable Crops in Minnesota

COVER CROPS FOR RASPBERRY PLANTINGS

primefacts Yield and digestibility of legume and oat forages Dr Brian Dear Principal Research Scientist

various P levels for the past two years. Treatments were a one time application

Is Lower Priced Urea a Bargain?

How To Feed Cows In The Winter

2014 Flax Weed Control Trial

Irrigated Pastures for Grass-Fed Beef Managing Irrigation for a Quality Product. Robert M. (Bob) Scriven 1 Grazing Consultant Kearney, Nebraska

PLAN TO PAY CREDITORS AND PROTECT FAMILY WELFARE

Management Strategies for Rangeland and Introduced Pastures

cow-calf Risk Management Using Put Options and Futures

Fertilizing hops improves yield and quality by

A Basic Guide for Beginning QuickBooks Users

Sewing and Textiles. Basic Supplies: Advanced Project Supplies: Needed: Optional:

Soil Sampling for Nutrient Management

SOIL FERTILITY MANAGEMENT BASICS. Organic Soil Amendments and Fertilizers

SWINE MANURE NUTRIENT UTILIZATION PROJECT

Managing Bermudagrass Pasture to Reduce Winter Hay Feeding in Beef Cattle Operations

Best practice guidelines for using poultry litter on pastures

Testing Water for Gardening and Lawn Irrigation

Strawberry Production Basics: Matted Row

Turfgrass Management of Bermudagrass Football Fields

Eastern Kentucky Meat Goat Budget Analysis

Penn State University Equine Environmental Stewardship Program

Measuring Soil Moisture for Irrigation Water Management

Soil and Leaf Tissue Testing for Commercial Citrus Production 1

MAINE SOIL TESTING SERVICE

ALFALFA FOR BEEF COWS

Analysis of Organic Fertilizers for Use in Vegetable Transplant Production

The Basics of Fertilizer Calculations for Greenhouse Crops Joyce G. Latimer, Extension Specialist, Greenhouse Crops; Virginia Tech

Pasture Forage Quality in West Virginia

MICRONUTRIENTS AS STARTER AND FOLIAR APPLICATION FOR CORN AND SOYBEAN

CALCULATING AVAILABLE FORAGE

Pasture, Rangeland, and Forage Insurance: A Risk Management Tool for Hay and Livestock Producers

NITROGEN MANAGEMENT IMPACTS ON WHEAT YIELD AND PROTEIN. Steve Orloff, Steve Wright and Mike Ottman 1 ABSTRACT

NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT. W. David Smith Extension Crop Science Specialist Tobacco

Irrigation Water for Greenhouses and Nurseries

Water Quality Management for Greenhouse Production

Transcription:

FERTILIZER MANAGEMENT FOR GRASS AND GRASS-LEGUME MIXTURES Rich Koenig, Extension Soil Specialist Mark Nelson, Beaver County Extension Agent James Barnhill, Weber County Extension Agent Dean Miner, Utah County Extension Agent August 2002 AG-FG-03 INTRODUCTION Grass and grass-legume mixtures serve an important role in providing hay and pasturebased forage for livestock in Utah. With proper species selection and favorable irrigation, fertility, and harvest or grazing management, yields of 8 tons/acre or more have been achieved. Management is the key to successful forage production. Supplying the correct amount of nutrients is one important management factor. FERTILITY REQUIREMENTS Grass grown for hay removes large quantities of nitrogen, phosphorus and other nutrients from soil (Table 1). Grass grown for pasture removes lower quantities of nutrients since as much as 85 to 90% of the nutrients consumed in the forage are redeposited on the Soil Testing is Essential! It is difficult to generalize about the location and occurrence of specific nutrient deficiencies in Utah. Soils are inherently variable due to both geologic processes and historic manure and inorganic fertilizer use. In addition, some irrigation water sources add nutrients to soil. For these reasons, soil testing is essential to determine which nutrients are needed and in what amounts for forage production. Fertilizer recommendations described in this guide are based on the latest research results from Utah State University trials. pasture in the form of manure and urine. Due to the recycling effect of grazing animals the nutrient requirements of pasture differ from the requirements of fields harvested for hay. Legumes such as alfalfa and clover have the ability to take nitrogen from the atmosphere and convert it into a form usable by plants. Including legumes in mixtures with grass lowers the amount of nitrogen fertilizer required to produce forages. Fertilizer recommendations for phosphorus, potassium, sulfur and micronutrients are based on current soil test data. In grazed pastures, these nutrient levels remain relatively stable or decline at much slower rates than in hay or field crop situations due to the recycling effect of the livestock. Therefore, once a soil test is completed and the fertilizer applied, retest pastures every three years to monitor nutrient levels. Hay fields should be tested annually.

FERTILIZER RECOMMENDATIONS Nitrogen. Nitrogen is the main nutrient needed by grass and certain grasslegume mixtures. Both the rate and timing of nitrogen applications will influence the yield, quality and seasonal distribution of forage. Grass and grass-legume mixtures vary widely in productivity. Utah State University research shows that responses to nitrogen can be as high as 100 pounds of forage produced per pound of nitrogen applied (Figure 1). Many factors govern the productivity of grass and grass-legume Table 1. Average nutrient concentrations and removal by grass hay. Nutrient Dry matter concentration Removal per ton of hay Nitrogen 2.0 % N 40 lb N Potassium 3.0 % K 2 O 60 lb K 2 O Phosphate 0.65 % P 2 O 5 13 lb P 2 O 5 Sulfur 0.25 % S 5 lb S mixtures, including soil conditions, irrigation water availability and management, and grazing management. Nitrogen recommendations based on the production potential of the site and the proportion of legume in the stand are summarized in Table 2. It is critical that growers identify the production potential of the site and fertilize according to that potential. Production potential can be estimated by assuming that grass-based forages will be comparable in yield to alfalfa on the site. Nitrogen will increase the crude protein content of pure grass and grass-dominated stands. Research has shown that the crude protein content of a grass like tall fescue can be increased from a low of <9% in unfertilized stands to a high of 18% with the application of 150 lb nitrogen/acre. Legumes also significantly improve forage quality. The seasonal distribution of forage can also be managed with nitrogen applications. Cool season grasses normally have a high rate of production in spring followed by a slowing of growth during the hot summer months. Applying large amounts of nitrogen in early spring will stimulate rapid growth and high yields. If this forage cannot be harvested for hay or grazed, consider postponing the early spring application of nitrogen or fertilizing only part of the field. Perennial ryegrass response to nitrogen (photo taken in May). The plot on the left received no nitrogen, the plot on the right received 50 lb N/acre in April. Figure 1. The effect of nitrogen rate on tall fescue and mixed fescue-clover yield.

Table 2. Nitrogen recommendations for irrigated grass and grass-legume mixtures. Yield potential of the site Stand composition 1-2 tons/acre 2-4 tons/acre 4-6 tons/acre 6-8 tons/acre ----------------- nitrogen recommendation (lbs/acre) ----------------- 100% grass 50 75 1 100-150 1 150-200 1 75% grass, 25% legume 25 50 75-100 100-150 1 50% grass, 50% legume 0 25 50 75 25% grass, 75% legume 0 0 25 50 1 For pasture, split the total nitrogen rate into two or three separate applications. Apply 1/3 to 1/2 of the nitrogen in early spring, 1/3 to 1/2 in June, and the remainder in late August. Schedule mid- and late-season nitrogen applications to coincide with irrigation or rainfall events. For hay-pasture systems, apply 2/3 of the nitrogen in early spring and 1/3 after the hay crop is removed to stimulate regrowth for grazing. Phosphorus. Low phosphorus soils are common in Utah. Research shows that grass and grass-legume mixtures will respond to phosphorus fertilizer applications when soils are deficient. Phosphorus applications also favor legumes and can enhance the proportion of legumes in a mixed stand. Phosphorus recommendations based on current soil test results are summarized in Table 3. These recommendations are adequate for 2 years of hay production or approximately 4 years of grazed pasture production. Phosphorus movement in soil is very limited; therefore, where possible apply and incorporate fertilizer prior to pasture establishment. Surface broadcast applications are also effective and should be made in the fall or early spring. Various sources of phosphorus are available, including triple superphosphate (0-45-0; 45% P 2 O 5 ), monoammonium phosphate (11-52-0; 52% P 2 O 5 ), and fluids such as 10-34-0 (34% P 2 O 5 ). Comparisons indicate that, when applied at the same rate of P 2 O 5, the materials are equally effective. Select a phosphorus source based on local availability, ease of application, and cost per unit of P 2 O 5. Potassium. Potassium deficiency is less common than phosphorus deficiency, Table 3. Phosphorus recommendations for grass and grass-legume mixtures. Soil test phosphorus is based on a 12 inch sample depth and sodium bicarbonate soil extract. Soil test phosphorus (mg/kg soil or ppm) Recommendations (lbs P 2 O 5 /acre) 0 to 3* 100-125 4 to 7 75-100 8 to 10 50-75 11 to 15 0-50 > 15 0 *Low soil test levels are severely limiting yield. Test soil annually until levels are adequate.

but is frequently found on sandy soils, fields irrigated with clean waters low in potassium, and high elevation sites. Limited research has shown that grass and grass-legume mixtures respond to potassium when soils are deficient. Fertilizer should not be applied unless a soil test indicates a need since fertilizing high potassium soils will produce undesirably high potassium levels in the forage. Potassium recommendations based on current soil test results are summarized in Table 4. Commonly available potassium sources are potassium chloride (0-0-60; 60% K 2 O) and potassium sulfate (0-0-50; 50% K 2 O). Select a potassium source based on local availability, ease of application, and cost per unit of K 2 O. A mixed tall fescue-clover stand. Managing the stand with nitrogen or phosphorus can shift the balance to favor either the grass or legume. Sulfur. In Utah, sulfur deficiency has been identified on sandy, low organic matter soils, fields irrigated with clean waters and high elevation locations. Sulfate-sulfur (SO 4 -S) soil test values less than 8 mg/kg soil (ppm) indicate the need for sulfur fertilization. Common sulfur sources in Utah include ammonium sulfate (21-0-0-24S; 24% sulfur), potassium sulfate (0-0-50-18S; 18% sulfur), gypsum (17% sulfur), and elemental sulfur (0-0-0-90S; 90% sulfur). Elemental sulfur is a slow release form that will last 3 to 4 years. Sulfate forms are more soluble and readily available, but may leach out of the soil in 1 to 2 years. Where sulfur deficiency has been identified, the application of 25 to 50 lbs sulfur/acre is recommended. Micronutrients. Deficiencies of zinc, iron, copper, manganese and boron are rare in grass and grass-legume mixtures. Soil testing will indicate whether these micronutrients are needed. Soil test interpretations are summarized in Table 5. If soil tests indicate a deficiency, apply 5 (for marginal levels) to 10 (for low levels) lbs of zinc, manganese, or iron, or 1 (for marginal) to 2 (for low) lbs of copper or boron per acre. Sulfate salts are common sources of zinc, manganese, iron, and copper. Sodium borate and boric acid are common sources of boron per acre. Table 4. Potassium recommendations for grass and grass-legume mixtures. Soil test potassium is based on a 12 inch sample depth and sodium bicarbonate soil extract. Soil test potassium (mg/kg soil or ppm) Recommendation (lbs K 2 O/acre) 0 to 40* 180-220 ADVANCED TECHNIQUES Fertigation. The application of liquid fertilizers through the irrigation system is an efficient way to supply nutrients, and allows growers to make in-season or split applications if desired. Liquid sources of most nutrients are available. Carefully compare the cost and convenience of using 40 to 70 140-180 70 to 100 80-120 100 to 150 40-60 > 150 0 *low soil test levels are severely limiting

liquid sources relative to dry fertilizer materials. On-farm testing. Conducting onfarm tests allows growers to customize management programs for specific situations. On-farm testing should be used to evaluate new fertility programs. To conduct an on farm test, treat several strips in a field with the new fertility practice and alternate with strips of the standard practice. Where possible, try to make several test strips across a field instead of just splitting a field in half and treating each half differently. Table 5. Micronutrient soil test values (mg/kg soil or ppm) and interpretations.* Nutrient Low Marginal Adequate Zinc <0.8 0.8-1.0 >1.0 Iron <3.0 3.0-5.0 >5.0 Copper <0.2 >0.2 Manganese <1.0 >1.0 Boron <0.25 0.25-0.5 >0.5 *DTPA extractable zinc, iron, copper, and manganese; hot water extractable boron. Keep records. Forages respond differently to fertilizer applications due to soil, variety, and other management differences across farms. Keeping individual records of soil and tissue test values, fertilizer applications, and yield for each field allows the grower to customize fertility programs for specific situations. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Funding for the research to develop these fertilizer recommendations was provided by the Utah Agricultural Experiment Station through the Utah State University Pasture and Forage Initiative. Utah State University is committed to providing an environment free from harassment and other forms of illegal discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, national origin, age (40 and older), disability, and veteran s status. USU s policy also prohibits discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation in employment and academic related practices and decisions. Utah State University employees and students cannot, because of race, color, religion, sex, national origin, age, disability, or veteran s status, refuse to hire; discharge; promote; demote; terminate; discriminate in compensation; or discriminate regarding terms, privileges, or conditions of employment, against any person other wise qualified. Employees and students also cannot discriminate in the classroom, residence halls, or in on/off campus, USU-sponsored events and activities. This publication is issued in furtherance of Cooperative Extension work. Acts of May 8 and June 30, 1914, in cooperation with the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Jack M. Payne, Vice President and Director, Cooperative Extension Service, Utah State University. (EP/DF/08-02)