New tools for new realities

Similar documents
Akkreditierung goes Europe

Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European Higher Education Area (ESG)

Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European Higher Education Area (ESG)

ESG Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European Higher Education Area

Die Neunion standards and Guidelines For Quality Assurance in the European Higher Education Area

enqa report to ministers responsible for higher education in the ehea

How To Improve The Quality Of Higher Education In Europe

Realising the European Higher Education Area

Quality Assurance and the Bologna Process- European and German Perspectives. Stefan Bienefeld, German Academic Exchange Service

UK Position Statement

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES. Proposal for a RECOMMENDATION OF THE COUNCIL AND OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

Quality Assurance in Higher Education

Making the Most of Our Potential: Consolidating the European Higher Education Area Bucharest Communiqué FINAL VERSION

EUROPEAN UNIVERSITIES CHARTER ON LIFELONG LEARNING

Seminar on Automatic Recognition Ministry of Education and Training

REPORT FROM THE INTERNATIONAL SEMINAR ON THE ROLE OF NATIONAL QUALIFICATIONS FRAMEWORKS AND QUALITY ASSURANCE IN RECOGNITION

Erasmus Mundus Programme. Russia Higher Education Mapping. Project UNIQUE - University Quality Exchange

Approach to Quality Assurance in Higher Education

YEREVAN COMMUNIQUÉ. A renewed vision: our priorities

Quality Assurance in University of Alicante

European Approach for Quality Assurance of Joint Programmes

Universities in the European Higher Education Area and the contribution of EUA

BSN Workshop for multipliers Turku/Gdansk 2009

FIBAA Accreditation Regulations for Dual Degree Programs

European Approach for Quality Assurance of Joint Programmes

The Cyprus Agency of Quality Assurance and Accreditation in Higher Education

National Report Sweden - Report on the Swedish follow-up of the Bologna Declaration and the Prague Communiqué

IHEQN. Irish Higher Education Quality Network

Quality Assurance in Joint Study Programs

Bologna process and new opportunities for cooperation

Quality Management Systems in Higher Education

Doctoral Education in the European Higher Education Area from a University Perspective

Quality assurance in joint programmes

Quality Management at BOKU

STUDENTS PARTICIPATION IN QUALITY ASSURANCE

FRANCE Implementation of the Sorbonne/Bologna Process objectives

Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European Higher Education Area

The European Qualifications Framework for Lifelong Learning (EQF)

Developing Joint Masters Programmes for Europe: lessons from the EUA Joint Masters Project

RECOMMENDATION ON THE RECOGNITION OF JOINT DEGREES

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES


Open and Online Learning and Teaching in HE. Vision & Values. Fred Mulder

Final Report. in the context of EAC (lot 3) Framework service contract prepared by the research team from

Review of NOKUT the Norwegian Agency for Quality Assurance in Education Report of the ENQA Panel May, 2013

Bologna Process Stocktaking

Mobility for Better Learning

ACADEMIC PERCEPTION OF THE BOLOGNA PROCESS

REPORT ON: A FRAMEWORK FOR QUALIFICATIONS OF THE EUROPEAN HIGHER EDUCATION AREA

Bologna process main assumptions, implementation in Poland and Ukraine

Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European Higher Education Area

EUROPEAN COMMISSION Directorate-General for Education and Culture. FROM PRAGUE TO BERLIN The EU Contribution PROGRESS REPORT

Examining Quality Culture: Part 1 Quality Assurance Processes in Higher Education Institutions. By Tia Loukkola and Thérèse Zhang

Working for the UK higher education sector. Guide to. The Bologna Process. The UK HE Europe Unit

The place and role of the national quality assurance system in advancing higher education reforms in a society

Conclusions on quality assurance supporting education and training. EDUCATIO, YOUTH, CULTURE and SPORT Council meeting Brussels, 20 May 2014

Strengths and obstacles for quality assurance in the European Higher Education Area: The Spanish case

MODERNISING HIGHER EDUCATION

The European Accreditation Agency for Public Health Education (EAAPHE)

Automatic Recognition of Full Degrees. Erasmus Student Network AISBL *1. Emanuel Alfranseder #2. February 2014

Final Report November 2006* *Note: This version of the report has been amended only to maintain working web references and hyperlinks. June 2009.

Statement of Beliefs

Strategy of the Federal and Länder Ministers of Science. for the Internationalisation of the Higher Education Institutions.

RECOMMENDATION ON THE RECOGNITION OF JOINT DEGREES

GUIDELINES TO THE CRITERIA FOR ACCREDITATION OF HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS IN BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA

Implementing Bologna Czech Republic. Bologna Seminar

Implementation of the Bologna Goals in Denmark

RECOMMENDATION ON THE RECOGNITION OF JOINT DEGREES

Comparability and equivalence of EU and Arab Higher Education Systems: A Lebanese University perspective

Policy Co-operation operation and Mobility in the European Higher Education Area

Iceland: National Action Plan for Recognition. Lisbon Recognition Convention

Doctoral training from a national policy perspective: Czech Republic. Jiří Nantl Tarragona, EUA-CDE, 16/6/2016

With the support of the Lifelong Learning Programme of the European Union EURO-INF

Maastricht Communiqué. on the Future Priorities of Enhanced European Cooperation in Vocational Education and Training (VET)

A Comparison of Biology Teacher Education Programmes in Finland and Turkey Hülya Delibaş (MA) Cem Babadoğan (PhD) Ankara University ABSTRACT

GUIDE TO DEVELOPING AND RUNNING JOINT PROGRAMMES AT BACHELOR AND MASTER S LEVEL. - A template

Quality Uni Graz

Realising the European Higher Education Area - Achieving the Goals. Conference of European Higher Education Ministers

Recogni4on of programmes accredited by cross border QA procedures The legal of recognibon of programmes and joint programmes in recognibon The

ECD-EAST Faculty Training workshops Tomsk, Moscow, Petersburg June 2011 Engineering Master Programmes in Europe

DECLARATION. Recommendations for the implementation. education and the matching of competences between higher education and the work field

METHODOLOGY FOR ASSESSMENT OF NON-FORMAL AND INFORMAL LEARNING ACHIEVEMENTS IN A STUDY PROCESS

THE ROLE OF LANGUAGES IN THE EUROPEAN HIGHER EDUCATION AREA

BEST PRACTICE IN ACCREDITATION OF ENGINEERING PROGRAMMES: AN EXEMPLAR

HIGHER EDUCATION IN TURKEY. Developments & Challenges. Prof. Dr. Mehmet Durman

BOLOGNA DECLARATION 1!

a report by Nick Harris (UK bologna Expert and international HE consultant) 30 th May 2010

Introductions. ACBSP is. ACBSP Statements. Cooperation and Competition at DRC Universities. ECBE accredits PROGRAMMES

RECOGNITION AND QUALITY ASSURANCE IN THE BOLOGNA PROCESS

Course description metadata (CDM) : A relevant and challenging standard for Universities

EUA PUBLICATIONS 2010

Salzburg ii recommendations. EuroPEan universities achievements SincE 2005 in implementing the Salzburg PrinciPlES

Background Report on the European Approach for Quality Assurance of Joint Programmes

introducing The Bologna Qualifications Framework

Study on the Diploma Supplement as seen by its users

QUALITY- A CHANGE GENERATOR FOR HIGHER EDUCATION

II. What is driving discussions on Quality (and Quality Assurance) in Europe

Council conclusions on effective leadership in education

European Higher Education Area (EHEA) The Bologna Process

Quality assurance and accreditation of PhD-programs in public administration

Transcription:

The European Students Union REPRESENTING STUDENTS SINCE 1982 New tools for new realities Student Centred Learning & the European Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance EQUIP Webinar Brussels, 13 April 2016 Fernando M Galán Palomares (ESU Chairperson) @fernandomgalan

The European Students Union The European Students' Union (ESU) is an umbrella organisation of 45 National Unions of Students from 38 different countries & 13 European student associations. Through its members, ESU represents over 15 million students in Europe. The aim of ESU is to represent and promote the educational, social, economic and cultural interests of students at the European level towards all relevant bodies and in particular the European Union, Bologna Follow Up Group, Council of Europe and UNESCO. Vision: Equal educational and social opportunities in an open and democratic Europe where students shape a sustainable future. ESU is diverse, democratic and open-minded

Long (hi)story short 17th October 1982: is founded in Stockholm 1989: Wall falls and WESIB becomes 1999: The Bologna Process starts and ESIB creates content committees From information exchange to more advocacy 2001: ESIB as stakeholder organization in the Bologna Process 2003: ESIB moves from Vienna to Brussels 2007: ESIB is renamed into 2017: 35th anniversary of WESIB/ESIB/ESU

Background QA and the ESG

QA in the Bologna Process Bologna Declaration (1999) Promotion of European co-operation in quality assurance with a view to developing comparable criteria and methodologies. Berlin Communiqué (2003) Call upon ENQA through its members, in cooperation with the EUA, EURASHE, and ESIB, to develop an agreed set of standards, procedures and guidelines on quality assurance and to explore ways of ensuring an adequate peer review system for quality assurance and/or accreditation agencies or bodies, and to report back through the Bologna Follow-Up Group to Ministers in 2005

European Standards & Guidelines Bergen Ministerial Conference (2005) and a RESGISTER?

Main issues for the ESG 2005 Focus on the educational process (or at least its main surrounding areas) Minimum common denominator (of 40 countries) Not strong/relevant principles Unclear relationship between Standards and Guidelines Weak language Very different context (no ECTS, EHEA QF, LO, DS, EQAR, )

What did the ministers say? Bucharest Communiqué (2012) We acknowledge the ENQA, ESU, EUA and EURASHE (the E4 group) report on the implementation and application of the European Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance (ESG). We will revise the ESG to improve their clarity, applicability and usefulness including their scope. The revision will be based upon an initial proposal to be prepared by the E4, in cooperation with Education International, BUSINESSEUROPE and the European Quality Assurance Register for Higher Education (EQAR), which will be submitted to the Bologna Follow-Up Group.

Bologna tools & instruments Learning Outcomes ECTS Diploma Supplement EHEA QF Cycle system

European Standards & Guidelines www.equip-project.eu/esg-2015

ESG 2015, a game changer?

Scope The focus of the ESG is on quality assurance related to learning and teaching in higher education, including the learning environment and relevant links to research and innovation. In addition institutions have policies and processes to ensure and improve the quality of their other activities, such as research and governance. The ESG apply to all higher education offered in the EHEA regardless of the mode of study or place of delivery. Thus, the ESG are also applicable to all higher education including transnational and cross-border provision. In this document the term programme refers to higher education in its broadest sense, including that which is not part of a programme leading to a formal degree.

Standards WHAT & Guidelines WHO Four principles Higher education institutions have primary responsibility for the quality of their provision and its assurance; Quality assurance responds to the diversity of higher education systems, institutions, programmes and students; Quality assurance supports the development of a quality culture; Quality assurance takes into account the needs and expectations of students, all other stakeholders and society.

ESG Part 1 - Internal QA Learning process Learning enviroment Info & transparency Internal QA system 1.2 Design and approval of programmes 1.5 Teaching staff 1.7 Information management 1.1 Policy for quality assurance 1.3 Student-centred learning, teaching and assessment 1.6 Learning resources and student support 1.8 Public information 1.9 On-going monitoring and periodic review of programmes 1.4 Student admission, progression, recognition and certification 1.10 Cyclical external quality assurance

Evolution, revolution or adaptation? ESG 2005 vs ESG 2015 Is it really that new? What a surprise!

Student-Centred Learning, what is it all about?

SCL A new concept? Student-Centred Learning and the teaching mission of higher education We reassert the importance of the teaching mission of higher education institutions and the necessity for ongoing curricular reform geared toward the development of learning outcomes. Student-Centred Learning requires empowering individual learners, new approaches to teaching and learning, effective support and guidance structures and a curriculum focused more clearly on the learner in all three cycles. Curricular reform will thus be an ongoing process leading to high quality, flexible and more individually tailored education paths. Academics, in close cooperation with student and employer representatives, will continue to develop learning outcomes and international reference points for a growing number of subject areas. We ask the higher education institutions to pay particular attention to improving the teaching quality of their study programmes at all levels. This should be a priority in the further implementation of the European Standards and Guidelines for quality assurance. Leuven Communiqué 2009

Entry level Graduation Learning and teaching process S S S S S S Recognition S DS Student Assessment Study Programme Intended LO Other LO Learning Environment (Teaching staff + Learning resources + Student support) & Links with research activities

Quality Assurance in EHEA Leaning & Teaching process - Study Programme - Links with research - Student-Centred Learning - Assessment & certification - Recognition - Teaching staff - Learning resources - Student support It is really great when all the parts work together

ESG part 1-1.3 1.3 Student-centred learning, teaching and assessment Institutions should ensure that the programmes are delivered in a way that encourages students to take an active role in creating the learning process, and that the assessment of students reflects this approach. Logic vs ESU s tojan horse ESG 1.3 - Student-Centred Learning, teaching and assessment

ESG part 1-1.3 ESG 1.3 - Student-Centred Learning, teaching and assessment

ESG 1.3 - Guideline (I) Student-centred learning and teaching plays an important role in stimulating students motivation, self-reflection and engagement in the learning process. This means careful consideration of the design and delivery of study programmes and the assessment of outcomes. The implementation of student-centred learning and teaching respects and attends to the diversity of students and their needs, enabling flexible learning paths; considers and uses different modes of delivery, where appropriate; flexibly uses a variety of pedagogical methods; regularly evaluates and adjusts the modes of delivery and pedagogical methods; encourages a sense of autonomy in the learner, while ensuring adequate guidance and support from the teacher; promotes mutual respect within the learner-teacher relationship; has appropriate procedures for dealing with students complaints. ( ) ESG 1.3 - Student-Centred Learning, teaching and assessment

ESG 1.3 - Guideline (II) ( ) Considering the importance of assessment for the students progression and their future careers, quality assurance processes for assessment take into account the following: Assessors are familiar with existing testing and examination methods and receive support in developing their own skills in this field; The criteria for and method of assessment as well as criteria for marking are published in advance; The assessment allows students to demonstrate the extent to which the intended learning outcomes have been achieved. Students are given feedback, which, if necessary, is linked to advice on the learning process; Where possible, assessment is carried out by more than one examiner; The regulations for assessment take into account mitigating circumstances; Assessment is consistent, fairly applied to all students and carried out in accordance with the stated procedures; A formal procedure for student appeals is in place. ESG 1.3 - Student-Centred Learning, teaching and assessment

Implementation of SCL ACTIVITIES ESG 1.3 - Student-Centred Learning, teaching and assessment

Now everything makes sense Doesn t it?

The European Students Union REPRESENTING STUDENTS SINCE 1982 Thank you! @fernandomgalan fernando.galan@esu-online.org

@ESUtwt European Students Union @fernandomgalan fernando.galan@esu-online.org The European Students Union Rue de l Industrie 10 1000 Brussels, Belgium Tel: +32 2 893 25 45 secretariat@esu-online.org www.esu-online.org