A CLIENT GUIDE TO PART 36 - OFFERS TO SETTLE



Similar documents
Open, Calderbank and Part 36 offers considerations and tactics

Costs Law Update Lamont v Burton

Expert evidence. A guide for expert witnesses and their clients (Second edition)

RULE 39 OFFER TO SETTLE

RULE 49 OFFER TO SETTLE

Pg. 01 French v Carter Lemon Camerons LLP

Conditional Fee Agreement: What You Need to Know

Conditional Fee Agreement: What You Need to Know

Guide to dispute resolution

TEMPLE LITIGATION ADVANTAGE INSURANCE FOR DISBURSEMENTS AND OPPONENT S COSTS Certificate of Insurance

Legal Watch: Personal Injury

GUIDE TO FUNDING YOUR MEDICAL NEGLIGENCE CLAIM

JENNIFER LEE. Withdrawal of Pre- Action Admissions: Woodland v Stopford, PIBULJ (July 2011).

What is taxation of costs?

Number 35 of 2007 PERSONAL INJURIES ASSESSMENT BOARD (AMENDMENT) ACT 2007 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS

Advice Note. An overview of civil proceedings in England. Introduction

THE JACKSON REFORMS. Lord Justice Jackson s review of Civil litigation costs and the impact on insurers. Nicola Billen. The Jackson Reforms

LEGAL GUIDE TO RECOVERING A TRADE DEBT

GIO Workers Compensation. New South Wales Insurance Policy

ACCIDENT BENEFIT CONTINGENCY FEE RETAINER AGREEMENT

A Practical Summary of the New Supreme Court Civil Rules for Clark Wilson LLP Insurance Clients

questions fees payable under the new process?

PRO-DEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY

Expert. Clear. Professional.

MEMORANDUM ON OFFERS TO SETTLE. 1. What is an Offer to Settle? 2. Why Make an Offer to Settle? 3. How Can it Help to Make an Offer to Settle?

scrutiny: Essential Guide to CRU Benefits and Appeals

Bar Council response to the Reducing Legal Costs in Clinical Negligence Claims pre-consultation paper

PERSONAL INJURIES BAR ASSOCIATION STANDARD TERMS AND CONDITIONS TREATED AS ANNEXED TO THE CONDITIONAL FEE AGREEMENT BETWEEN SOLICITOR AND COUNSEL

The Incorporated Law Society of Cardiff and District. Members Forum 30 January 2013 JACKSON REFORMS WHERE ARE WE NOW? Michael Imperato Simon Cradick

(2) [ ] of [ ] (the Indemnified Person). The Indemnified Person is a director of the Company.

Short Form CFA based on "APIL/PIBA 9" for personal injuries and clinical negligence claims from

DEFENDANT LITIGATION SERVICE

THIS AGREEMENT is made the day of 20. THE LAW AID TRUST of 205 William Street, Melbourne, Victoria (hereinafter called Law Aid )

APIL/PIBA CFA version 9, for personal injuries and clinical negligence claims, from ,

TAKING A SMALL CLAIMS ACTION IN THE COUNTY COURT USING AN EXPERT

What is my claim worth?

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA THE LSBC CAPTIVE INSURANCE COMPANY PLAINTIFF NOTICE OF CIVIL CLAIM

CHAPTER 43 ACTIONS OF DAMAGES FOR, OR ARISING FROM, PERSONAL INJURIES

Personal Injury Claims

Conditional Fee Arrangements, After the Event Insurance and beyond!

Province of Alberta LIMITATIONS ACT. Revised Statutes of Alberta 2000 Chapter L-12. Current as of December 17, Office Consolidation

CONDITIONAL FEE AGREEMENTS GUIDANCE

Number 31 of 2004 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS. Preliminary and General

Dispute Resolution At A Glance Guide 2. The English Civil Procedure Rules The Woolf Reforms

IMF (Australia) Ltd. Combined Financial Services Guide and Product Disclosure Statement

Directions questionnaire (Fast track and Multi-track)

RETAINER AGREEMENT: CIVIL RIGHTS CASE

MISCELLANEOUS PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY INSURANCE COVERAGE FORM

A brief guide to professional negligence claims

MOTOR VEHICLE ACCIDENT CLAIMS ACT

Will, trust and estate disputes

Costs Payable in Personal Injury Claims under the Various Legislative Regimes by Paul Garrett

FIXED COSTS PART 45. Contents of this Part

Low value personal injury

The Lifecycle of a Personal Injury Claim. By Andrew Mckie (Barrister at Law) Clerksroom July Telephone or go to

Part 10. Directors and Company Secretaries

Legal Watch: Personal Injury

CFAs & ATE Policies Implications for Professional Indemnity Market

Excess Lawyers Professional Liability Policy DECLARATIONS. Attaching to and forming part of

Guidance for the instruction of experts in civil claims

BRACKNELL FOREST COUNCIL ADULT SOCIAL CARE & HEALTH DEBT RECOVERY POLICY & PROCEDURES

Motor Accidents Compensation Amendment (Claims and Dispute Resolution) Act 2007 No 95

SURETY. and Title: (Any additional signatures appear on the last page of this Performance Bond.)

A court claim has been made against me what should I do?

AIA Document A310 TM 2010

CIVIL LITIGATION ASSISTANCE SCHEME CONDITIONS OF ASSISTANCE

Schedule of Forms SCHEDULE OF FORMS 3. Nil

NEW PRACTICE DIRECTION ON NON-INJURY MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS

THIS AGREEMENT is made the day of 20. THE LAW AID TRUST of 205 William Street, Melbourne, Victoria (hereinafter called

Errors and Omissions Insurance. 1.0 Introduction and Definition

ASSEMBLY BILL No. 597

Conditional Fee Agreement ( CFA ) [For use in personal injury and clinical negligence cases only].

Registrar's Practice Guide for Work Injury Damages in the Workers Compensation Commission

Insurance Coverage In Consumer Class Actions

Factors to Consider When Handling a Long Term Disability Benefits Case. Several issues may arise in the course of a lawsuit for long term disability

Loan Car Legal Cover Terms and Conditions

Conditional Fee Agreement (CFA)

A BILL for AN ACT. Serial 137 Personal Injuries (Civil Claims) Bill 2003 Dr Toyne

Legal Watch: Personal Injury

A claim has been made against me - What should I do?

Practice and Procedure for Claimants and Defendants in Credit-Hire Cases. William Hibbert

MIB Uninsured Agreement

Number 46 of 2003 PERSONAL INJURIES ASSESSMENT BOARD ACT 2003 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS PART 1. Preliminary and General

Guide to litigation costs and funding

Workers Compensation Amendment (Transitional) Regulation 2012

Client Care and Terms and Conditions

Information sheet Pre-Action Protocol for Low Value Personal Injury (Employers Liability and Public Liability) Claims

PUBLIC ENTITY RISK MANAGEMENT AUTHORITY MEMORANDUM OF WORKERS COMPENSATION AND EMPLOYERS LIABILITY COVERAGE

PERSONAL INJURY CLAIMS

ASSEMBLY BILL No. 597

PRACTICE DIRECTION No. 8 of 2001 FAMILY PROVISION APPLICATIONS

PIERCE COUNTY DISTRICT COURT 930 TACOMA AVE S, Room 239, TACOMA, Small Claims Information

1.2 Analyse matters to be considered by the judge when awarding damages for pain, suffering and loss of amenity

This innovative Scheme has been developed to resolve small claims disputes within the maritime industry.

Clinical Negligence: A guide to making a claim

Proposals for Settlement: How to draft ones that will stick and how to deal with them when they land on your desk By Ellen K. Lyons and Gary M.

Transcription:

A CLIENT GUIDE TO PART 36 - OFFERS TO SETTLE Part 36 is a provision in the Civil Procedure Rules ( CPR ) designed to encourage parties to settle disputes without going to trial. Under Part 36, both claimants and defendants can inform the other side what they will accept or offer to resolve a dispute. If a party does not accept an offer made under Part 36 (a Part 36 offer ), it risks being made liable to pay more in interest and/or costs on a judgment than if no offer had been made. These costs consequences and the circumstances in which they will apply are set out in more detail below. This financial risk encourages parties to make Part 36 offers and to seriously consider Part 36 offers made to them. Part 36 offers are made without prejudice As Part 36 offers are made on a without prejudice save as to costs basis, the court is not made aware of a Part 36 offer until after it has reached judgment, but before it has made an order in relation to the costs of the proceedings. Timing of Part 36 offers Part 36 offers can be made at any time up to the time of judgment, and even before court proceedings are issued. However Part 36 does not apply to claims which have been allocated to the small claims track (the usual track for claims for less than 10,000). Part 36 offer requirements A Part 36 offer must be in writing, state that it is intended to have the consequences of Part 36, state whether the offer is made to settle the whole claim or only part of it (and if so which part) and whether it takes into account any counterclaim. If a Part 36 offer is made 21 days or more before the start of trial, it must also specify a period (the Relevant Period ) of not less than 21 days within which the defendant will be liable for the claimant s costs if the offer is accepted. This is based on the principle that a claimant is entitled to be paid its costs upon settlement of the claim.

Although the rules allow for the Relevant Period to be longer than 21 days, it is unlikely in practice that any longer period would be used in any Part 36 offer. If the Part 36 offer is being made by a defendant and the offer is to pay a sum of money in settlement of a claim, then the offer must be to pay a single sum (not a series of instalments). Also the defendant must offer to pay the sum no later than 14 days after acceptance by the claimant, otherwise the offer will not be treated as a Part 36 offer (unless the claimant accepts the offer). Offers which are not made in accordance with Part 36 will not have those consequences, although the court will take such offers into account when considering what order to make about costs. Clarification of Part 36 offers A party can within 7 days of receiving the offer request clarification of the offer to enable it to consider the offer properly, and if it does not receive such clarification it can ask the court to make an order requiring the party making the offer to supply it. Withdrawn or changing Part 36 offers A Part 36 offer cannot be withdrawn or changed to be less advantageous to the other party until the Relevant Period (referred to above) has expired, unless the court s permission to do so is obtained. Once the Relevant Period has expired, however, it can be withdrawn or changed at any time (unless the other party has already accepted the offer), although if this happens then the Part 36 costs consequences will be lost. Accepting Part 36 Offers A party who wants to accept a Part 36 offer can do so in writing at any time. Note that if a party makes more than one offer, the other party can still accept an earlier offer, as long as that earlier offer has not been withdrawn or changed. If the trial has already started, however, then the court s permission to accept the offer is required. Also if the offer is made by one defendant to a claim of joint liability and the claimant wishes to continue the claim against the other defendants, it will again need the court s permission to accept the offer. Consequences of accepting a Part 36 offer If the offer involves the defendant paying a sum of money to the claimant, it must pay that sum within 14 days of the date of acceptance (or any other date agreed between the parties), as 2

otherwise the claimant can enter judgment against it for that sum. So a defendant must make sure that it can pay the settlement sum within 14 days, before making or accepting a Part 36 offer. If the offer is accepted within the Relevant Period, the claimant is entitled to its costs up to the date it accepts the offer. If the parties cannot agree the amount of costs, they will be assessed by the court on what is called the standard basis, which normally means that the claimant recovers about 60-70% of the actual costs he has incurred. If the offer is not accepted within the Relevant Period, or the offer is made less than 21 days before trial, then if the parties do not agree the liability for costs, the court will make an order as to costs. The court rules make it clear that if the offer is accepted after the Relevant Period, then the presumption is that the claimant is entitled to its costs up to the date on which the Relevant Period expired, and the party accepting the offer is liable for the costs of the party making the offer for the period from the date of expiry of the Relevant Period to the date of acceptance. Again, costs will be assessed on the standard basis if not agreed. Although the court rules only apply if court proceedings have been commenced, if a Part 36 offer is accepted before proceedings have been commenced then as long as the Part 36 offer was properly worded, the above consequences should apply on the basis of a contract between the parties. Consequences of non-acceptance of a defendant s Part 36 offer If the claimant obtains a more advantageous judgment to it than the terms of a defendant s Part 36 offer, then (assuming that it has not matched or beaten its own Part 36 offer), all that will happen is that the court will apply the usual principles when considering what order as to costs to make. If claimant fails to obtain a more advantageous judgment than a defendant s Part 36 offer, and the offer is made more than 21 days before trial, then unless the court considers it unjust to do so, the claimant will be liable to pay the defendant s costs from the date of expiry of the Relevant Period and interest on those costs. This means that even though the claimant may get a judgment in his favour, it will have to pay some of the defendant s costs as a penalty for not accepting the defendant s Part 36 offer which would have disposed of the claim earlier and on more generous terms to itself. Therefore defendants need to pitch their offers carefully as claimants will not accept offers which they consider so low that the risk of adverse costs consequences is acceptable to them. 3

Claimants need to assess the risks of not beating a defendant s Part 36 offer upon receipt of that offer and (if the offer is not accepted at the time), as the claim progresses in case the risk assessment changes in the light of subsequent developments in the litigation process. Consequences of non-acceptance of a claimant s Part 36 offer If the claimant obtains a judgment that is not as advantageous to it than the terms of the claimant s Part 36 offer, then (assuming that he has not failed to beat a defendant s Part 36 offer), all that will happen is that the court will apply the usual principles when considering what order as to costs to make. If the claimant obtains a judgment that is at least as advantageous if not better than the terms of the Part 36 offer, and the offer is made more than 21 days before trial, then unless the court considers it unjust to do so, it will order that the claimant is entitled to: interest on the whole or part of any money awarded at not more than 10% above base rate for some or all of the period starting with expiry of the Relevant Period; its costs on the indemnity basis (which is more generous than the standard basis) from the date of expiry of the Relevant Period; interest on those costs not exceeding 10% above base rate; and an additional amount of up to a maximum 75,000 (calculated as being 10% of the money awarded up to 500,000 and 5% above this amount up to 1m; if it is a non-money claim, this additional amount is calculated on the amount of costs ordered instead). This means that the defendant will have to pay an additional amount and more in terms of costs and interest than it would have had to if the claimant had not made the Part 36 offer, as a penalty for not accepting the claimant s Part 36 offer which would have disposed of the claim earlier and on more generous terms to itself. Therefore claimants need to decide carefully what offers to make, as defendants will not accept offers that are so high that the risks of adverse costs consequences are acceptably low; and defendants need to carefully assess the risks that a claimant will match or beat its Part 36 offer when it is made and, if not accepted at the time, to re-assess those risks as the claim progresses. How the court decides whether the above costs consequences are unjust The court will take into account the terms of any Part 36 offer, when the offer was made, the information that was available to the parties when the offer was made, and the conduct of the parties with regard to the giving or refusing to give information to allow the offer to be made or evaluated. 4

When the above costs consequences do not apply The above costs consequences do not apply to offers made less than 21 days before trial, unless the court allows the Relevant Period to be shortened. It also does not apply to offers that are withdrawn, or changed to be less generous to the party to whom the offer is made. For further information contact: Richard King direct line: 01483 734242 email: richard.king@stevens-bolton.com Michael Frisby direct line: 01483 734244 email: michael.frisby@stevens-bolton.com This information is necessarily brief and is not intended to be an exhaustive statement of the law. It is essential that professional advice is sought before any decision is taken Stevens & Bolton LLP 2013 5