GENERAL GUIDANCE ON HOLD-TIME STUDIES

Similar documents
GENERAL GUIDANCE FOR INSPECTORS ON HOLD-TIME STUDIES

PROPOSED UPDATED TEXT FOR WHO GOOD MANUFACTURING PRACTICES FOR PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS: MAIN PRINCIPLES (JANUARY 2013)

PROPOSAL FOR REVISION OF THE SUPPLEMENTARY GUIDELINES ON GOOD MANUFACTURING PRACTICES: VALIDATION, APPENDIX 7: NON-STERILE PROCESS VALIDATION

DRAFT MONOGRAPH FOR THE INTERNATIONAL PHARMACOPOEIA PARACETAMOL ORAL SUSPENSION (September 2010)

Working Party on Control of Medicines and Inspections. Final Version of Annex 15 to the EU Guide to Good Manufacturing Practice

SPECIFICATIONS AND CONTROL TESTS ON THE FINISHED PRODUCT

LUMEFANTRINE Draft proposal for The International Pharmacopoeia (October 2006)

Workshop B Control Strategy

GUIDE TO GOOD MANUFACTURING PRACTICE FOR MEDICINAL PRODUCTS ANNEX 15 *

11.I In-process control Authors: Dr. Christian Gausepohl / Paolomi Mukherji / Update 07

STABILITY TESTING OF ACTIVE SUBSTANCES AND PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS

ICH Topic Q 1 A Stability Testing Guidelines: Stability Testing of New Drug Substances and Products

EUROPEAN COMMISSION HEALTH AND CONSUMERS DIRECTORATE-GENERAL. EudraLex. The Rules Governing Medicinal Products in the European Union

Guideline on Process Validation

Annex 7 Guidelines on pre-approval inspections

Journal of Chemical and Pharmaceutical Research

[See Rules 74,74-A, 74-B, 78 and 78-A] A. SUBSTANCES OTHER THAN PARENTERAL IN PREPARATIONS IN GENERAL

Annex 9 Guide to good storage practices for pharmaceuticals 1

PHARMACEUTICAL DEVELOPMENT

TABLET REFORMULATION CASE STUDY. Executive Summary

Continuous Granulation and Drying

Unedited version adopted by the 45th WHO Expert Committee on specifications for pharmaceutical preparations. World Health Organization 2010

SUPPLEMENTARY GUIDELINES ON GOOD MANUFACTURING PRACTICES (GMP): VALIDATION

Working Party on Control of Medicines and Inspections. Final Version of Annex 16 to the EU Guide to Good Manufacturing Practice

WHO GUIDELINE ON TRANSFER OF TECHNOLOGY

EXPERT REVIEW PANEL PROCEDURE: ADDITIONAL SUPPORT TO PROCUREMENT AGENCIES UNDER EXCEPTIONAL CIRCUMSTANCES

International Health Regulations

HOMEOPATHIC MEDICINAL PRODUCT WORKING GROUP (HMPWG) GUIDANCE ON MODULE 3 OF THE HOMEOPATHIC MEDICINAL PRODUCTS DOSSIER

Pharmaceutical Quality Systems: US Perspective

Cleaning Validation in Active pharmaceutical Ingredient manufacturing plants

PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT GUIDE

Performance Evaluation of Actimask 92S Ibuprofen: A Novel Taste-Masked Ibuprofen for Use in Orally-Dispersible Dosage Forms

Calibration of temperature control and monitoring devices

Guideline on stability testing for applications for variations to a marketing authorisation

Guide to Inspections of Tablet Manufacturing Facilities including Pre/Post Approval Issues as per USFDA

Guidance for Industry ANDAs: Stability Testing of Drug Substances and Products

Implementing New USP Chapters for Analytical Method Validation

EXPERT COMMITTEE ON BIOLOGICAL STANDARDIZATION EXPERT COMMITTEE ON SPECIFICATIONS FOR PHARMACEUTICAL PREPARATIONS Geneva, 18 to 22 October 2010

The role of innovative financing mechanisms for health

A Stability Program for the Distribution of Drug Products

Validation and Calibration. Definitions and Terminology

JANUARY 2013 PREPARATION OF A SITE MASTER FILE FOR A MANUFACTURER OF COSMETIC PRODUCTS

Table 1. Pure superdisintegrant tablet formulation. Material % w/w Weight (mg) Superdisintegrant Stearic acid 1 2.

GOOD DISTRIBUTION PRACTICES (GDP) FOR PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS

Post-Approval Change Management: Challenges and Opportunities An FDA Perspective

GOOD DOCUMENTATION AND QUALITY MANAGEMENT PRINCIPLES. Vimal Sachdeva Technical Officer (Inspector), WHO Prequalification of Medicines Programme

PROCESS VALIDATION OF TABLETS: AN OVERVIEW

Vinod et al., ARPB, 2013; Vol 3 (II) ISSN

Workshop A Design Space (DS)

Annex 2. WHO good manufacturing practices for pharmaceutical products: main principles 1

World Health Organization Prequalification of Medicines

Pharmaceutical Wholesaler Site Inspection Checklist

Evaluating Current Practices in Shelf Life Estimation

GUIDELINE ON ACTIVE PHARMACEUTICAL INGREDIENT MASTER FILE (APIMF) PROCEDURE 1 (The APIMF procedure guideline does not apply to biological APIs.

The importance of normalisation when comparing tablet properties

OVERVIEW OF THE PREQUALIFICATION OF DIAGNOSTICS ASSESSMENT PROCESS. Prequalification of Diagnostics

THE PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRY

Comparative analysis between the possible regulatory approaches to GMP compliance TITOLO PRESENTAZIONE

1.0 Introduction Page Scope Page General Principles of Shelf-life Studies Page Selection of Batches Page 4

UNICEF s Quality Assurance System for procurement of medicines

Microbiology and Auditing. Don Singer

Cleaning and Contamination Control

Annex 7 Application of Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Point (HACCP) methodology to pharmaceuticals

Recent Updates on European Requirements and what QPs are expected to do

WHO GUIDELINE ON QUALITY RISK MANAGEMENT

GUIDELINES ON VALIDATION APPENDIX 5 VALIDATION OF COMPUTERIZED SYSTEMS

GMP ANNEX 1 REVISION 2008, INTERPRETATION OF MOST IMPORTANT CHANGES FOR THE MANUFACTURE OF STERILE MEDICINAL PRODUCTS

Annex 6. Guidance on variations to a prequalified product dossier. Preface

Title:: Effective GMP AUDITS for APIs and Formulation Pharma Companies By G.Sundar-Director/Consultant PharmQA Compliance solutions

Research Article Prospective Validation of Paracetamol Tablet Dosage Form

Process Validation Protocol (Reference: SOP )

Annex 2 Stability testing of active pharmaceutical ingredients and finished pharmaceutical products

Session 6: WHO Prequalification Programme. Key Process Steps WHO: Medicines UNFPA: Condoms and IUDs

Work instructions. 1. Changes since last revision. 2. Records. 3. Instructions EXPLANATORY NOTES

Manufacturing Services. Operational solutions for chemical, pharmaceutical, nutraceutical and cosmetic companies

Library Guide: Pharmaceutical GMPs

FAO SPECIFICATIONS FAO PLANT PROTECTION PRODUCTS. THIRAM tetramethylthiuram disulphide

ICH guideline Q8, Q9 and Q10 - questions and answers volume 4

GMP Regulatory Considerations

Guide for Documenting and Sharing Best Practices. in Health Programmes

Content Uniformity (CU) testing for the 21 st Century: CDER Perspective

PHARMACEUTICAL QUALITY SYSTEM Q10

Q8(R2): Pharmaceutical Development

Guidance for Industry: Starting Material Supplier Management

VALIDATION OF ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES: TEXT AND METHODOLOGY Q2(R1)

PROPOSAL FOR A PROCEDURE ON SAMPLING AND MARKET SURVEILLANCE SURVEY (JULY 2012)

COMMITTEE FOR PROPRIETARY MEDICINAL PRODUCTS (CPMP)

WHO GUIDELINE ON QUALITY RISK MANAGEMENT

Guide to Master Formulae WHO/FWC/IVB/QSS/VQR

Annex 3 Procedure for prequalification of pharmaceutical products

Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Points (HACCP) 1 Overview

Compliance Case Study #3 Manual Processes, Performance, Responsibilities, and Training

Draft guidance for registered pharmacies preparing unlicensed medicines

Guidance for Industry

Annex 7 WHO guidelines on transfer of technology in pharmaceutical manufacturing

STABILITY TESTING: PHOTOSTABILITY TESTING OF NEW DRUG SUBSTANCES AND PRODUCTS

Public Assessment Report. Scientific discussion. Calcium and Vitamine D3 Alpex 1000 mg/880 IE, effervescent granules

Transcription:

August 2014 Document for comment 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 GENERAL GUIDANCE ON HOLD-TIME STUDIES REVISED DRAFT FOR COMMENT (August 2014) Should you have any comments on the attached text, please send these to Dr Sabine Kopp, Group Lead, Medicines Quality Assurance, Technologies, Standards and Norms, World Health Organization, 1211 Geneva 27, Switzerland; email: kopps@who.int; fax: (+41 22) 791 4730 (kopps@who.int) and to Ms Marie Gaspard (gaspardm@who.int), by 30 September 2014. Working documents are sent out electronically and they will also be placed on the Medicines web site for comment. If you do not already receive directly our draft guidelines please let us have your e-mail address (to bonnyw@who.int) and we will add it to our electronic mailing list. World Health Organization 2014 All rights reserved. This draft is intended for a restricted audience only, i.e. the individuals and organizations having received this draft. The draft may not be reviewed, abstracted, quoted, reproduced, transmitted, distributed, translated or adapted, in part or in whole, in any form or by any means outside these individuals and organizations (including the organizations' concerned staff and member organizations) without the permission of the World Health Organization. The draft should not be displayed on any website. Please send any request for permission to: Dr Sabine Kopp, Group Lead, Medicines Quality Assurance, Technologies, Standards and Norms, Department of Essential Medicines and Health Products, World Health Organization, CH-1211 Geneva 27, Switzerland. Fax: (41-22) 791 4730; email: kopps@who.int. The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this draft do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the World Health Organization concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Dotted lines on maps represent approximate border lines for which there may not yet be full agreement. The mention of specific companies or of certain manufacturers products does not imply that they are endorsed or recommended by the World Health Organization in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. Errors and omissions excepted, the names of proprietary products are distinguished by initial capital letters. All reasonable precautions have been taken by the World Health Organization to verify the information contained in this draft. However, the printed material is being distributed without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. The responsibility for the interpretation and use of the material lies with the reader. In no event shall the World Health Organization be liable for damages arising from its use. This draft does not necessarily represent the decisions or the stated policy of the World Health Organization.

page 2 47 48 49 SCHEDULE FOR THE ADOPTION PROCESS OF DOCUMENT QAS/13.521 GENERAL GUIDANCE ON HOLD-TIME STUDIES Preparation of draft by Dr A.J. van Zyl, South Africa, based on need identified by the WHO Prequalification Programme inspectors Date November-December 2012 Preliminary internal review of draft January 2013 Draft mailed for comments February 2013 Collation of comments April 2013 Review by inspectors collaborating with the WHO Prequalification Programme Discussion during the joint informal consultation with Prequalification Inspection team and inspectors from national inspectorates Follow-up of e-discussion of Subgroup with expert inspectors to finalize new draft of working document for comments Recirculation of working document for comments May 2013 30 May 2013 June 2013 July 2013 Compilation of comments and feedback September 2013 Review of feedback received with Prequalification Inspection team Presentation to forty-eighth meeting of the WHO Expert Committee on Specifications for Pharmaceutical Preparations Review of comments with subgroup of WHO Expert Committee on Specifications for Pharmaceutical Preparations and subsequently with Dr A.J. van Zyl and the Prequalification Team Inspections Group September 2013 14-18 October 2013 October 2013 January 2014

page 3 Further follow-up action as required Recirculation of working document for comments February 2014 Compilation of comments April 2014 50 51 Discussion of feedback during informal consultation on medicines quality: GXPs, inspection guides and risk management Recirculation of updated working document Compilation of comments and evaluation of feedback received Presentation to forty-ninth meeting of the WHO Expert Committee on Specifications for Pharmaceutical Preparations Further follow-up action as required 28-30 April 2014 August 2014 End September 2014 October 2014

page 4 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 GENERAL GUIDANCE ON HOLD-TIME STUDIES CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND 2. GLOSSARY 3. SCOPE 4. ASPECTS TO BE CONSIDERED 1. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND Manufacturers should ensure that the products that they manufacture are safe, effective and of the quality required for their intended use. Products should be consistently manufactured to the quality standards appropriate to their intended use and as required by the marketing authorization. Systems should ensure that pharmaceutical products are produced according to validated processes and to defined procedures. Manufacturing processes should be shown to be capable of consistently manufacturing pharmaceutical products of the required quality that comply with their specifications. Arrangements should exist to ensure that the dispensed raw materials and packaging materials, intermediate products, bulk and finished products are stored under appropriate conditions. Storage should not have any significant negative effect on the processing, stability, safety, efficacy or quality of the materials, intermediate products and bulk products prior to final packing. Good manufacturing practices (GMP) require that a maximum acceptable holding period should be established to ensure that intermediates and bulk product can be held, pending the next processing step, without any significant

page 5 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 adverse effect to the quality of the material. Such a holding period should be underwritten by data, but need not be extended to find the edge of failure. 2. GLOSSARY Bulk product Any pharmaceutical product which has completed all processing stages up to, but not including, final packaging. Intermediate Partly processed product that must undergo further manufacturing steps before it becomes a bulk product. 3. SCOPE This guideline focus primarily on aspects that should be considered in the design of the hold-time studies during the manufacture of solid dosage forms. Many of the principles herein also apply to other dosage forms such as liquids, creams and ointments. This guideline does not cover aspects for hold times in cleaning validation or the manufacturing of active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs). This guideline is intended as a basic guide for use by pharmaceutical manufacturers and GMP inspectors. This document does not intend to prescribe a process for establishing hold times, but reflects aspects that should be considered in the design of the hold-time study. Manufacturers should gather scientific and justifiable data to demonstrate that the dispensed raw materials and packaging materials, intermediate and bulk products: - remain of appropriate quality before processing to the next stage;

page 6 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 - meet the acceptance criteria and release specification for the finished product. 4. ASPECTS TO BE CONSIDERED Hold time can be considered as the established time period for which materials (dispensed raw materials, intermediates and bulk dosage form awaiting final packaging) may be held under specified conditions and will remain within the defined specifications. Data to justify the hold time can be collected, but not limited to: - during development on pilot-scale batches, - during scale up, - during process validation, or - as part of an investigation of a deviation that occurred during manufacture. Hold-time studies establish the time limits for holding the materials at different stages of production to ensure that the quality of the product does not deteriorate significantly during the hold time. The design of the study should reflect the holding time at each stage. Hold times should normally be determined prior to marketing of a product and following any significant changes in processes, equipment, starting and packaging materials and represent actual processing. Hold time studies should be included during process validation (Ref: Process validation guideline). Manufacturers may use a flow chart to review the manufacturing procedure of a product and then break up the critical stages of manufacturing process on the basis of time duration required for the particular storage and processing stages, typical pauses in the manufacturing campaign, and the potential impact of storage with reference to environmental and storage conditions. An example for a flow chart is given below. For example, for oral tablets that are coated the following stages may be considered: - binder preparation to granulation consider the granulate;

page 7 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 - wet granulation to drying the dried granulate; - dried granules to lubrication/blending the lubricated blend; - blend to compression; - compression to coating the tablet cores; - coating solution to preparation the coating solution; - coating to packing consider the bulk coated tablets; - coating to packing in bulk or FDF; - packing in bulk to FDF. Example for a flow chart : Granules: Core tablets: Coated tablet: Dispensing Sifting Dry Mixing Granulation Drying Lubrication &Blending Compression Coating Packing Drying Binder Blend: Coating Solution:

page 8 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 A written protocol, procedure or programme should be followed which includes the activities to be performed, test parameters and acceptance criteria appropriate to the material or product under test. The protocol and report should generally include the following: a title; reference number; version; date; objective; scope; responsibility; procedure; description of the material/product; sample quantities; sampling method and criteria; acceptance limits; frequency for sampling; sampling locations; pooling of samples; storage conditions; type of container; methods of ; results; conclusion; recommendation; signatures and dates. Acceptance criteria are typically more stringent than registered specifications to provide assurance that the material is well within control. When setting the specifications any known stability trends will need to be taken into account. For certain products microbiological aspects should also be considered and included where appropriate. Typically one or more batches of a material, intermediate or product can be used for determining hold times. A risk-based approach can be used to determine the appropriate number of batches, considering inter alia the characteristics of the materials A representative sample of the batch of material or product subjected to the hold-time study should be held for the defined hold period. The maximum hold period for each category of material should be established on the basis of the study by keeping the material in either the original or simulated container used in production. The containers used in which hold-time samples are stored should be the same pack as used in production unless the pack is exceptionally large, in which case one that is equivalent (same material of construction and closure system to the production packaging system) may be used. Reducing the size of container when necessary for testing holding time, should be justified. Where head space is important the hold-time samples should represent the maximum possible head space (worst-case scenario) to bulk stored in manufacturing/quarantine. The sample storage environmental conditions should be same as that of the quarantine area/manufacture stage.asampling plan should be established

page 9 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 and followed for taking samples for testing at the different intervals. The required sample amount should be calculated based on the batch size, the intervals and tests to be performed. Results should be compared with the initial baseline data of the control sample. Samples may be pooled for where appropriate, e.g. when the of a composite sample will not miss issues expected in the variation of the product. Where appropriate, statistical of the data generated should be performed to identify trends and to justify the limits and hold time set. Batches of finished products made from intermediates or bulk products and subjected to a hold-time study should be considered for long-term stability testing if data show adverse trending or shifting patterns during the intermediate time points up to the end of the shelf-life. The shelf-life of the product irrespective of hold times should be measured from the time the active ingredients are mixed with other ingredients. Normally intermediate and bulk products should not be stored beyond the established hold time. All testing of bulk intermediates and product should be performed using validated stability- indicating methods. The following table provides examples of stages and tests that may be considered. Table: Examples of stages and tests that may be considered, based on risk assessment and specific product needs Stage Test to be carried out as per specification Study time Binder preparation Microbial test Initial, 2hrs, 5hrs, 8hrs. In case of starch: initial, 2hrs, 5hrs Solution prepared (including granulation pastes, coating solution and coating suspensión Physical appearance, Specific gravity, Viscosity, Sedimentation, ph, Microbial test Initial, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72 hours

page 10 Granule Description, Assay, Related substances, Loss on drying, Water content, Particle size distribution, Bulk density, Tap density, Angle of repose. Initial, 30 th day, 45 th day Blend Microbial test, Loss on drying, Blend uniformity, Particle size, Bulk/Tapped density Initial, 30 th day, 45 th day 234 Core tablets uncoated (in bulk container Coated tablets (in bulk container) Description, Hardness, Thickness, Friability, Disintegration, Dissolution or Dissolution profile, assay, Degradation products/ related substance, Uniformity of dosage units, Microbial test. Description, Hardness, Thickness, Friability, Disintegration, Dissolution or Dissolution profile, Assay, Degradation products/ related substance, Uniformity of dosage units, Moisture content, Microbial test. Initial, 30 th day, 60 th day & 90 th day Initial, 30th day, 60th day & 90th day 235 236 ***