The University of Georgia

Similar documents
The University of Georgia

The University of Georgia

Economic Impact Analysis of School Facility Construction

Natural Air Drying Corn Paul E. Sumner University of Georgia Biological and Agricultural Engineering Department

VII. DIRECT, INDIRECT, AND INDUCED ECONOMIC IMPACTS OF UC SAN DIEGO

The Economic Impact of Health Services on the Economy of Sumter County, Alabama

The Economic Impacts of Business Energy Tax Credit Supported Manufacturing in Oregon 2012 Update

The Economic Impact of the New Hospital on the Economy of Drumright, Creek County, Oklahoma

The Economic Impact of the Health Sector on the Economy of Dallas County, Iowa a. Daniel Otto and Georgeanne Artz b

A Lee County Economic Impact Study Prepared for

Think About Energy Summit

THE PROJECTED ECONOMIC AND FISCAL IMPACTS OF A TENNESSEE HISTORIC REHABILITATION INVESTMENT INCENTIVE

Estimated Economic Impact of Gulf Oil Spill on Virginia s Oyster Industry July 2010

Economic Impacts of Utah Valley University

Regional Economic Impact Analysis

Would you like to know more about the

CONTRIBUTION OF THE ETHANOL INDUSTRY TO THE ECONOMY OF THE UNITED STATES IN 2014

Key Consideration Points to Ensure a Successful Business Plan for Developing an Ethanol Manufacturing Business

Agriculture & Business Management Notes...

ECONOMIC EMERGENCY PROGRAM St. Cloud Printing Plant Closure

Economic Impact of Washington Dairy Farms: An Input-Output Analysis

ECONOMIC CONTRIBUTION OF NORTH CAROLINA AGRICULTURE AND AGRIBUSINESS

The Economic Impact of Tourism in New York Calendar Year Catskills Focus

How much did your farm business earn last year?

Final Report. Measuring the Economic Impact of Improved Electricity Distribution in Connecticut. Prepared by Regional Economic Models, Inc.

DEMONSTRATING ECONOMIC

Economic Contribution of Telecommunication Companies Serving Greater Minnesota

Impact of Fuel Price Increases on Texas Crops

NOV The ECONOMIC VALUE of IDAHO PUBLIC COLLEGES & UNIVERSITIES. Main Report. Analysis of the Economic Impact & Return on Investment of Education

Missouri Soybean Economic Impact Report

The Economic Impact of Tourism in New York Calendar Year Central New York Focus

The University of Georgia

A REPORT OF THE ECONOMIC IMPACT OF ABC CORPORATION IN AUSTIN, TEXAS

Farm Financial Management

The Economic Impact of a Rural Dentist Gerald A. Doeksen, Fred C. Eilrich and Cheryl F. St. Clair, National Center for Rural Health Works

KING COLLEGE SCHOOL OF BUSINESS KING COLLEGE REGIONAL ECONOMIC STUDIES (KCRES) KCRES PAPER NO. 4, May 2012

Background on the Economic Impact Methodology Used in the Analysis

National Center for Rural Health Works

The Importance of the Health Care Sector to the Economy of Cherokee County

How To Calculate The Economic Impact Of Medical Professions On The State Of Nevada

September An Analysis of the Impacts of MIPS Program Spending and the Commercialization of MIPS Funded Projects on the State of Maryland

Economic Impact of the Queen of Peace Hospital and Related Health Sectors of Scott County

Economic and Fiscal Impact Analysis Facebook s Forest City Data Center

Understanding and Misunderstanding Retail Multipliers

An Economic Impact Analysis.

Agricultural ECONOMICS. The Use of Multipliers in Economic Impact Estimates

THE INVISIBLE ENGINE:

The Economic Impact of One WVU Home Football Game on the Monongalia County Economy. Dr. Christiadi Demographer

The economic impact of Normandale Community College

Introduction and Disaster Impact Discussion

billion paid to private sector workers during Focus on Meeting and Convention Segment. The convention and

Introduction. Introduction, Contd. Introduction, Contd.

Prepared. for: Motion. Picture. Prepared HR&A. Advisors, 99

Eli Lilly. and Company. in Indiana

How much financing will your farm business

Transportation Infrastructure Investment Prioritization: Responding to Regional and National Trends and Demands Jeremy Sage

Golden Gate Baptist Theological Seminary

Economic Impact of The Charleston International Airport Complex

Economic Impact of Skidmore College on Saratoga County

Economic Impact of Proposed Tax and Spending Reductions in Kansas

APPENDIX 7 POPULATION AND EMPLOYMENT PROJECTIONS

Estimating Market Potential: Is There a Market?

Enhancing International Cooperation on Biomass

Economic and Fiscal Impacts of the New Mexico Film Production Tax Credit

THE ECONOMIC IMPACT OF THE BEER INDUSTRY IN SOUTH CAROLINA

Economic Consequences of Building the Black Hills Energy Power Plant in Pueblo County with a Project Labor Agreement

How Crop Insurance Works. The Basics

IHS Study on the Economic Impact of Proposed Restrictions on Tax Exempt Bonds for Nonprofit Organizations

Prepared for: The Northeast Ohio Regional Sewer District. Prepared by: Ziona Austrian, Ph.D. Candice Clouse, M.S. Iryna Lendel, Ph.D.

The Contribution of the Dairy Industry to the Idaho Economy: 2011 and Analysis for. Idaho Dairymen s Association.

Effective Federal Income Tax Rates Faced By Small Businesses in the United States

Date 1/2/2014. Prepared for. Virginia Land Investments Patterson Ave., Suite 200 Richmond, VA Cleveland, Ohio. Richmond, Virginia

U.S. crop program fiscal costs: Revised estimates with updated participation information

Tennessee Agricultural Production and Rural Infrastructure

WASSCE / WAEC ECONOMICS SYLLABUS

Economic Impact of Changing Electricity Suppliers in the City of Socorro

A Business Newsletter for Agriculture. Vol. 12, No. 1 Energy agriculture - where s the nitrogen?

Employment Impacts for Proposed Bay Delta Water Conveyance Tunnel Options

Estimating the Effects of Spending

Economic Impact of Proposed Tax and Spending Reductions in Kansas Final Report Prepared by: John D. Wong, J.D., Ph.D.

CHAPTER 5: MEASURING GDP AND ECONOMIC GROWTH

Fort McPherson. Atlanta, GA MSA. Drivers of Economic Growth February Prepared By: chmuraecon.com

THE ECONOMIC IMPACTS OF SELECTED PROFESSIONALS ON THE ECONOMY OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

Topic 4: Different approaches to GDP

The Economic Contributions of U.S. Mining (2012)

Hand-held and Backpack Sprayers for Applying Pesticides

The Economic Benefits of Oil and Natural Gas Production: An Analysis of Effects on the United States and Major Energy Producing States

Chinese Home Appliance Manufacturing: A Case Study of TCL Corporation

planning market analysis & site location services Economic Impact Analysis:

Public Relations Agencies in Los Angeles County

Demonstrating the Value of Arizona Community Colleges

The Economic and Community Impact of Downsizing Postal Sorting Operations in New Orleans

Economic Impacts of the University of California, Riverside

PRINEVILLE DATA CENTER

Southwest Minnesota Agrifuels Cooperative

Economic Contributions of Pacific Gas and Electric Company

The economic impact of Minnesota State Colleges and Universities

Rhode Island Historic Preservation Investment Tax Credit Economic & Fiscal Impact Analysis

Energy Offices Meeting

Economic Impacts of Extending Health Care Coverage in Florida

Transcription:

The University of Georgia Center for Agribusiness and Economic Development College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences Economic Impacts of an Ethanol Plant in Mitchell County Prepared by: Archie Flanders and John McKissick Center Report: CR-06-04 September 2006

Economic Impacts of an Ethanol Plant in Mitchell County Executive Summary Construction and operation of an ethanol plant in rural southwestern Georgia has the potential to create economic benefits throughout the region and the entire state of Georgia. Financial data for construction of the plant, as well as annual operating revenues and expenses are provided by officials of a plant proposed for location in Camilla, GA. Construction of a $124.8 million ethanol plant in Mitchell County is projected to involve 530 jobs. Plant construction leads to $39.0 million of output related to construction. This output involves an additional 351 jobs throughout the state. Labor income totals $32.8 million of income for 882 proprietors and employees in Georgia during the fifteen month construction period. Operation of the ethanol plant creates annual sales of $195.6 million in Mitchell County. This creates $17.3 million in additional economic activity that totals $212.9 million in Mitchell County as inputs and supplies are utilized during production. Employees and proprietors in Mitchell County earn income of $7.6 million for 290 full-time and part-time jobs. $2.5 million in income is earned by 77 employees in production, and $5.1 million is earned in 214 jobs that are impacted by production. Local governments in Mitchell County collect $468,801 in annual tax revenues due to production of ethanol. Output totals $198.0 million in the southwestern region of Georgia. Proprietors and employees in southwestern Georgia earn $13.2 million per year due to ethanol production. Indirect impacts involve 383 jobs and income earnings are $10.5 million. Local governments in southwestern Georgia collect $772,489 in annual tax revenues due to production at the ethanol plant. The ethanol plant in Mitchell County stimulates economic output that totals $266.6 million to the Georgia economy. Employees and proprietors in Georgia earn $22.8 million for employment in 549 full-time and part-time jobs. Besides the $2.7 million earned by 86 employees directly involved in production, $20.1 million of income is earned by 462 proprietors and employees in Georgia who are impacted by plant operations. The state of Georgia collects $2.3 million annually in state taxes due to operation of the ethanol plant in Mitchell County. Utilization of corn produced in Georgia as feedstock has potential to increase economic output by up to $189.7 million.

Economic Impacts of an Ethanol Plant in Mitchell County Construction and operation of an ethanol plant in rural southwestern Georgia has the potential to create economic benefits throughout the region and the entire state of Georgia. This report estimates economic impacts caused by a plant operating in Camilla, Georgia. Financial data for construction of the plant, as well as annual operating revenues and expenses are provided by officials of the proposed plant. The authors of this impact analysis have neither verified data supplied for this research nor conducted a feasibility analysis of the proposed ethanol plant. Impacts due to construction of the ethanol plant are one-time benefits occurring within the fifteen month period of construction. Total construction costs are $124.8 million and include facilities and operating equipment, rail road track and rolling stock, office equipment and computers, water treatment and fire protection systems, and an administrative building. Ethanol production impacts occur annually and derive from operating inputs utilized. Total revenue is the direct output of the operation and is projected as $174.8 million. The ethanol plant plans to use corn from Georgia as supplies are available. Carbon dioxide is a by-product of ethanol production that is converted into a liquid form (LCO2) and then into dry ice. Officials of the proposed ethanol plant state that carbon dioxide will lead to sales of $17.4 million from LCO2 production and $5.8 million from production of dry ice. Manufacturing costs data for LCO2 and dry ice production are supplied by ethanol plant officials. Reported impacts in this report include ethanol, LCO2, and dry ice production. Input-Output Models and Economic Impact Analysis Economic impacts are estimated with input-output models that separate the economy into various sectors, such as agriculture, construction, manufacturing, trade, and services. The input-output model then calculates how a change in one industry changes output, income, and employment in other industries. These changes, or impacts, are expressed in terms of direct, indirect, and induced effects. Direct effects represent the initial impact on the economy of some feature (i.e. construction or operations) of an enterprise. Indirect effects are changes in other industries caused by direct effects of an enterprise. Induced effects are changes in household spending due to changes in economic activity generated by both direct and indirect effects. Thus, the total economic impact is the sum of direct, indirect, and induced effects. Input-output analysis can interpret the effects of an enterprise in a number of ways including output (sales), labor income (employee compensation and proprietary income), employment (jobs), and tax revenue. Economic impacts result from a multiplier effect that begins with expenditures of an enterprise stimulating business to business spending, personal income, employment, and tax revenue. IMPLAN models include a regional purchase coefficient (RPC) for each impact variable that represents percentage of demand that is satisfied by production within an impact area. Enterprises vary in their multiplier effects due to differing expenditure levels, RPC s, and sectors in which their expenditures are directed. Impact analysis involves quantification of spending levels and proper allocation to impacted sectors. Output impacts are a measure of economic activity that results from enterprise expenditures in a specific industrial sector. Output is equivalent to sales, and this multiplier offers insights into 1

how initial economic activity in one sector leads to sales in other sectors. Personal income impacts measure purchasing power that is created due to the output impacts. This impact provides the best measure of how standards of living are affected for residents in the impact area. An enterprise involves a specified number of employees that is determined by the technology of the enterprise. Employment multipliers indicate the effect on employment resulting from the enterprise initiating economic activity. IMPLAN indirect and induced employment includes both full-time and part-time jobs without any distinction. Jobs calculated within an IMPLAN industrial sector are not limited to whole numbers and fractional amounts represent additional hours worked without an additional employee. With no measure of hours involved in employment impacts, IMPLAN summations for industrial sectors which include fractional employment represent both jobs and job equivalents. Since employment may result from some employees working additional hours in existing jobs, instead of terming indirect and induced employment impacts as creating jobs, a more accurate term is involving jobs. This report includes impact results for a state model, a regional model, and a county model. Each model is independent of the others and a model for a smaller geographical area should not be regarded as a subset of a model representing a larger area. Employment and average annual wages and benefits are determined by labor productivity and average annual earnings in sectors that are unique for each model. The state of Georgia has designated 12 state service delivery regions (SDR) in order to foster regional collaboration in economic development. This study includes the fourteen counties of SDR 10, with Mitchell County centrally located in this region of southwestern Georgia. Construction Impacts One-time construction impacts for Georgia are presented in Table 1. Direct output of $50.6 million is less than total construction costs because many construction items involve economic activity outside the impact area of Georgia. Direct output during the fifteen month period leads to additional output that totals $89.7 million. This output generates income of $32.8 million for proprietors and employees. A total of 882 full-time and part-time jobs are involved in construction, and total labor income averages $37,193 in wages and benefits. Georgia realizes $2.4 million in state tax revenue, while local governments throughout the state receive $1.7 million during the construction period. Appendix 1 shows the distribution of output, income, and employment in the major industrial sectors. Table 1. Plant Construction: One-time Economic Benefits to Georgia Direct Indirect Induced Total Effect Effect Effect Effect Output ($) 50,631,924 18,016,921 21,034,568 89,683,413 Labor Income ($) 19,229,628 6,516,319 7,057,905 32,803,852 Employment 530 144 207 882 State Taxes ($) 2,427,501 Local Taxes ($) 1,743,917 2

Operation Impacts Annual benefits accrue in the state economy each year the plant is in production. Reported impacts in this section do not include potential impacts from utilizing Georgia corn production as a feedstock. Impacts due to Georgia corn production are reported in the following section. Impacts for Georgia presented in Table 2 indicate that the $198.0 million in direct sales of ethanol, LCO2, and dry ice production leads to an additional $68.7 in output for a total output impact of $266.6 million. Total direct income for production and administrative employees is $2.7 million for 86 employees. Additional income of $20.1 million for impacted proprietors and employees results in $22.8 million of income due to operation of the ethanol plant. Total labor income averages $47,517 for 549 full-time and part-time jobs. State tax revenues generated are $2.3 million and local tax revenues are $2.0 million. In addition to local tax revenues reported in Table 2, Mitchell County officials state that $1.5 million will be collected annually in property taxes on the ethanol facility. Reported tax revenues in this report do not include any sales tax on output sold as a finished product by the operations. The distribution of output, income, and employment among the major industrial sectors is presented in Appendix 2. Table 2. Ethanol, LCO2, and Dry Ice Production: Annual Economic Benefits to Georgia Direct Indirect Induced Total Effect Effect Effect Effect Output ($) 197,985,612 55,761,583 12,894,732 266,641,927 Labor Income ($) 2,698,130 15,768,048 4,326,677 22,792,855 Employment 86 335 127 549 State Taxes ($) 2,305,711 Local Taxes ($) 2,024,171 Annual benefits accrue in the regional economy each year the plant is in production. Table 3 shows annual benefits to SDR 10 located in southwestern Georgia. Results indicate that the $190.8 million of direct sales leads to an additional $38.2 in output for a total output impact of $236.2 million. Total direct income for production and administrative employees is $2.7 million for 86 employees. Additional income of $10.5 million for impacted proprietors and employees results in $13.2 million of income due to operation of the ethanol plant. Total labor income averages $28,190 for 469 full-time and part-time jobs. State tax revenues generated from economic activity in southwestern Georgia are $976,206 and local tax revenues are $772,489. In addition to local tax revenues reported in Table 3, Mitchell County officials state that $1.5 million will be collected annually in property taxes on the ethanol facility. Tax revenues do not include any sales tax on output sold as a finished product by the operation. The distribution of output, income, and employment among the major industrial sectors is presented in Appendix 3. 3

Table 3. Ethanol, LCO2, and Dry Ice Production: Annual Economic Benefits to SW Georgia Direct Indirect Induced Total Effect Effect Effect Effect Output ($) 197,985,612 32,797,215 5,437,244 236,220,070 Labor Income ($) 2,698,130 8,737,383 1,785,466 13,220,979 Employment 86 315 68 469 State Taxes ($) 976,206 Local Taxes ($) 772,489 Annual benefits accrue in the Mitchell county economy each year the plant is in production. Direct output is less than output for Georgia and southwestern Georgia because dry ice production includes output from two plants, one of which is located outside of Mitchell County. Table 4 indicates that the $195.6 million of direct sales leads to an additional $17.3 in output for a total output impact of $212.9 million. Total direct income for production and administrative employees is $2.5 million for 77 employees. Additional income of $5.1 million for impacted proprietors and employees results in $7.6 million of income due to operation of the ethanol plant. Total labor income averages $26,204 for 290 full-time and part-time jobs in Mitchell County. State tax revenues generated from economic activity in Mitchell County are $554,882 and local tax revenues are $468,801. In addition to local tax revenues reported in Table 4, Mitchell County officials state that $1.5 million will be collected annually in property taxes on the ethanol facility. Tax revenues do not include any sales tax on output sold as a finished product by the operation. The distribution of output, income, and employment among the major industrial sectors is presented in Appendix 4. Table 4. Ethanol, LCO2, and Dry Ice Production: Annual Economic Benefits to Mitchell County Direct Indirect Induced Total Effect Effect Effect Effect Output ($) 195,612,072 15,741,325 1,580,523 212,933,921 Labor Income ($) 2,503,984 4,642,642 452,474 7,599,100 Employment 77 193 21 290 State Taxes ($) 554,882 Local Taxes ($) 468,801 Impacts of Georgia Corn as Feedstock Utilization of corn produced in Georgia as an ethanol feedstock would increase output, employment, labor income and taxes above levels reported in Tables 2-4. Officials of the proposed ethanol plant state that original construction costs include handling and storage capacity for 1.1 million bushels of corn, and plans call for increasing capacity by an additional 1.5 million bushels. Annual feedstock needs of the ethanol plant entail corn valued at $105.2 million. State economic impacts for 100% of feedstock produced by Georgia corn producers are presented in Table 5. Results in Table 5 are only valid for circumstances in which corn production beyond current levels consists of new agricultural land going into production that is 4

presently idle. Corn acreage that replaces acreage currently in other agricultural production such as cotton and peanuts generates economic impacts only at the expense of lost impacts due to displaced production. Table 5. GA Corn Production as Feedstock: Annual Economic Benefits to Georgia Direct Indirect Induced Total Effect Effect Effect Effect Output ($) 105,174,976 27,514,314 56,972,769 189,662,059 Labor Income ($) 56,133,024 9,467,825 19,116,390 84,717,238 Employment 3,486 294 562 4,342 State Taxes ($) 5,620,875 Local Taxes ($) 4,104,754 Charts 1-3 show output, labor income, employment, and taxes that would be realized based on varying percentages of the total effects in Table 5. Percentages represent the level of corn production occurring as new agricultural acreage in Georgia. Impacts reported for 100% are the summation of total effects reported in Table 2 and Table 5. Impacts reported for 0% are equal to total effects reported in Table 2. Reported impacts are for the Georgia economy. 500.0 $Million 450.0 400.0 350.0 300.0 250.0 200.0 456.3 408.9 361.5 314.1 266.6 150.0 100.0 50.0 0.0 107.5 86.3 65.2 44.0 100% 75% 50% 25% 0% Corn % Output ($) Labor Income ($) 22.8 Chart 1. Output and Labor Income Impact of Ethanol, LCO2, and Dry Ice Production in GA, by Percentage of Corn Feedstock Produced in GA 5

6,000 5,000 4,890 4,000 3,805 Jobs 3,000 2,000 2,719 1,634 1,000 549 0 100% 75% 50% 25% 0% Corn % Chart 2. Employment Impact of Ethanol, LCO2, and Dry Ice Production in GA, by Percentage of Corn Feedstock Produced in GA 8.0 7.9 7.0 6.0 6.1 6.5 5.0 5.1 5.1 $Million 4.0 3.0 2.0 4.1 3.7 3.1 2.3 2.0 1.0 0.0 100% 75% 50% 25% 0% Corn % State Taxes ($) Local Taxes ($) Chart 3. State Tax and Local Tax Revenue Generated Due to Ethanol, LCO2, and Dry Ice Production in GA, by Percentage of Corn Feedstock Produced in GA 6

Summary Construction of a $124.8 million ethanol plant in Mitchell County is projected to involve 530 jobs. Plant construction leads to $39.0 million of output related to construction. This output involves an additional 351 jobs throughout the state. Labor income totals $32.8 million of income for 882 proprietors and employees in Georgia during the fifteen month construction period. Operation of the ethanol plant creates annual sales of $195.6 million in Mitchell County. This creates $17.3 million in additional economic activity that totals $212.9 million in Mitchell County as inputs and supplies are utilized during production. Employees and proprietors in Mitchell County earn income of $7.6 million for 290 full-time and part-time jobs. $2.5 million in income is earned by 77 employees in production, and $5.1 million is earned in 214 jobs that are impacted by production. Local governments in Mitchell County collect $468,801 in annual tax revenues due to production of ethanol. Output totals $198.0 million in the southwestern region of Georgia. Proprietors and employees in southwestern Georgia earn $13.2 million per year due to ethanol production. Indirect impacts involve 383 jobs and income earnings are $10.5 million. Local governments in southwestern Georgia collect $772,489 in annual tax revenues due to production at the ethanol plant. The ethanol plant in Mitchell County stimulates economic output that totals $266.6 million to the Georgia economy. Employees and proprietors in Georgia earn $22.8 million for employment in 549 full-time and part-time jobs. Besides the $2.7 million earned by 86 employees directly involved in production, $20.1 million of income is earned by 462 proprietors and employees in Georgia who are impacted by plant operations. The state of Georgia collects $2.3 million annually in state taxes due to operation of the ethanol plant in Mitchell County. Utilization of corn produced in Georgia as feedstock has potential to increase economic output by up to $189.7 million. 7

Appendix 1. Plant Construction: One-time Economic Benefits to Major Sectors, Georgia Sector Output ($) Income ($) Employment Agriculture 223,501 83,182 3 MC 1 6,491,640 2,871,276 72 Utilities 1,138,000 232,656 2 Manufacturing 8,559,258 1,993,574 38 Transportation, Warehousing 1,824,910 829,797 18 Trade 6,358,220 2,821,141 75 FIRE 2 5,799,267 1,543,991 33 Services 54,391,552 20,408,367 615 Government & Non NAIC's 4,897,065 2,019,868 26 Total 89,683,413 32,803,852 882 1 Mining and Construction 2 Finance, Insurance, and Real Estate Appendix 2. Ethanol, LCO2, and Dry Ice Production: Annual Economic Benefits to Major Sectors, Georgia Sector Output ($) Income ($) Employment Agriculture 179,330 65,519 2 MC 1 540,475 181,022 4 Utilities 22,300,536 3,724,052 30 Manufacturing 204,791,878 4,183,085 105 Transportation, Warehousing 9,367,989 3,407,968 87 Trade 4,304,849 1,928,737 57 FIRE 2 4,341,791 1,179,365 24 Services 18,186,479 7,995,444 237 Government & Non NAIC's 2,628,600 127,665 3 Total 266,641,927 22,792,855 549 1 Mining and Construction 2 Finance, Insurance, and Real Estate 8

Appendix 3. Ethanol, LCO2, and Dry Ice Production: Annual Economic Benefits to Major Sectors, SW Georgia Sector Output ($) Income ($) Employment Agriculture 130,274 62,977 1 MC 1 169,189 73,846 2 Utilities 6,572,500 731,631 17 Manufacturing 202,456,532 2,992,831 92 Transportation, Warehousing 8,622,954 2,960,973 91 Trade 2,726,059 1,223,165 50 FIRE 2 1,673,616 454,389 12 Services 11,802,632 4,615,599 201 Government & Non NAIC's 2,066,314 105,567 3 Total 236,220,070 13,220,979 469 1 Mining and Construction 2 Finance, Insurance, and Real Estate Appendix 4. Ethanol, LCO2, and Dry Ice Production: Annual Economic Benefits to Major Sectors, Mitchell County Sector Output ($) Income ($) Employment Agriculture 81,132 40,345 1 MC 1 51,299 19,402 1 Utilities 3,492,473 749,201 11 Manufacturing 195,862,978 2,551,951 79 Transportation, Warehousing 5,618,075 1,902,478 63 Trade 1,063,949 487,510 22 FIRE 2 619,151 149,528 5 Services 4,744,184 1,640,425 107 Government & Non NAIC's 1,400,681 58,261 2 Total 212,933,921 7,599,100 290 1 Mining and Construction 2 Finance, Insurance, and Real Estate 9

Appendix 5. GA Corn Production as Feedstock: Annual Economic Benefits to Major Sectors, Georgia Sector Output ($) Income ($) Employment Agriculture 108,870,256 59,236,592 3,641 MC 1 857,862 350,203 9 Utilities 2,468,416 511,293 4 Manufacturing 10,622,369 1,652,170 31 Transportation, Warehousing 3,402,660 1,448,277 33 Trade 13,841,047 6,174,724 174 FIRE 2 17,241,463 4,124,792 98 Services 24,054,424 10,776,665 343 Government & Non NAIC's 8,303,562 442,522 10 Total 189,662,059 84,717,238 4,342 1 Mining and Construction 2 Finance, Insurance, and Real Estate 10

The Center for Agribusiness & Economic Development The Center for Agribusiness and Economic Development is a unit of the College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences of the University of Georgia, combining the missions of research and extension. The Center has among its objectives: To provide feasibility and other short term studies for current or potential Georgia agribusiness firms and/or emerging food and fiber industries. To provide agricultural, natural resource, and demographic data for private and public decision makers. To find out more, visit our Web site at: http://www.caed.uga.edu Or contact: John McKissick, Director Center for Agribusiness and Economic Development Lumpkin House The University of Georgia Athens, Georgia 30602-7509 Phone (706)542-0760 caed@agecon.uga.edu The University of Georgia and Fort Valley State University, and the U.S. Department of Agriculture and counties of the state cooperating. The Cooperative Extension Service offers educational programs, assistance and materials to all people without regard to race, color, national origin, age, sex or disability. An equal opportunity/affirmative action organization committed to a diverse work force. Report Number: CR-06-04 September 2006 Issued in furtherance of Cooperation Extension Acts of May 8 and June 30, 1914, the University of Georgia College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, and the U.S. Department of Agriculture cooperating. J. Scott Angle, Dean and Director