Case 3:11-cv B Document 8 Filed 06/21/11 Page 1 of 10 PageID 37

Similar documents
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION

Case 6:15-cv Document 1 Filed 07/08/15 Page 1 of 13 PageID #: 1

Case 6:16-cv Document 1 Filed 02/23/16 Page 1 of 15 PageID #: 1

Case 6:12-cv Document 1 Filed 10/22/12 Page 1 of 14 PageID #: 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

Case 3:14-cv M Document 1 Filed 05/19/14 Page 1 of 9 PageID 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

Case 6:15-cv Document 1 Filed 01/20/15 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA GREENVILLE DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LUFKIN DIVISION. v. Case No. COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

GOODIX TECHNOLOGY INC., SHENZHEN HUIDING TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD. A/K/A SHENZHEN GOODIX TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD., and

Case 2:14-cv AJS Document 1 Filed 08/22/14 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

Case 6:15-cv JRG-KNM Document 1 Filed 02/25/15 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

Case 2:15-cv RWS Document 1 Filed 07/10/15 Page 1 of 16 PageID #: 1

Case5:15-cv NC Document1 Filed06/10/15 Page1 of 8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT THE PARTIES

Case 1:14-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 10/31/14 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Broadband Graphics - infringement of Patent Law and Procedure

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA LYNCHBURG (CHARLOTTESVILLE) DIVISION. Plaintiff, Case No. v.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 1:10-cv WGY Document 1 Filed 03/23/10 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

Case 2:07-cv LED Document 1-1 Filed 10/09/2007 Page 1 of 5

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

Case 1:14-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 08/21/14 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION

Case 1:13-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 01/04/13 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY DEFENDANT S ANSWER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE. Plaintiff Endeavor MeshTech, Inc. ( Plaintiff or Endeavor ), by and through its

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH, CENTRAL DIVISION

Case 3:15-cv MO Document 1 Filed 10/16/15 Page 1 of 8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ORIGINAL COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

Case 1:15-cv Document 1 Filed 06/02/15 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLORADO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND

Case 9:15-cv JIC Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/19/2015 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA. Case No.

Case 2:10-cv JCM-LRL Document 1 Filed 07/22/10 Page 1 of 8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN. Plaintiff, Hon.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

Case 1:14-cv WGY Document 1 Filed 05/16/14 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND

IN THE UNITED STATE DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE. v. ) C.A. No.

Case 1:14-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 02/26/14 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case5:12-cv LHK Document261 Filed08/31/12 Page1 of 15. Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant Apple Inc.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CA No. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case4:15-cv DMR Document1 Filed09/16/15 Page1 of 11

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 3:15-cv MLC-LHG Document 1 Filed 11/17/15 Page 1 of 7 PageID: 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION ORIGINAL COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Case 4:11-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 06/10/11 Page 1 of 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

CASE 0:12-cv RHK-TNL Document 1 Filed 09/14/12 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION. v. JURY DEMANDED COMPLAINT THE PARTIES

Case 1:16-cv CBA-PK Document 1 Filed 01/21/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case 6:10-cv LED Document 1 Filed 09/21/10 Page 1 of 16 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION PATENT CASE

Case 1:10-cv JBS -KMW Document 1 Filed 01/12/10 Page 1 of 21 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

Case5:15-cv HRL Document1 Filed01/28/15 Page1 of 12

Case3:15-cv JCS Document1 Filed09/01/15 Page1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 2:09-cv TJW Document 1 Filed 09/23/2009 Page 1 of 8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. ) IATRIC SYSTEMS, INC., ) ) ) Civil Action No. 1:14-cv ) v. ) ) FAIRWARNING, INC.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE. Case No.

Case 1:12-cv RPM Document 1 Filed 04/09/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO CIVIL NUM.:

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION. v. CIVIL ACTION NO.

Case 1:12-cv SLR Document 8 Filed 03/09/12 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 216 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case: 3:14-cv bbc Document #: 1 Filed: 01/31/14 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN

Case 1:14-cv ERK-JMA Document 1-1 Filed 02/27/14 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 6 CIVIL COVER SHEET (SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON NEXT PAGE OF THIS FORM.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT

How To File A Lawsuit Against A Corporation In California

Case: 1:14-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 12/03/14 Page 1 of 9 PageID #:1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION AMERICAS, INC., COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT

Case 1:15-cv GAO Document 1 Filed 07/23/15 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE ELEVENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA. v. CASE NO. COMPLAINT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 2:15-cv SHL-dkv Document 1 Filed 04/09/15 Page 1 of 16 PageID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 9 th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA

Case 6:14-cv WSS Document 1-24 Filed 01/13/14 Page 1 of 35 EXHIBIT F

Case 1:12-cv RBJ Document 1 Filed 04/26/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Case 4:15-cv A Document 1 Filed 06/10/15 Page 1 of 9 PageID 1. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT for the NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

Case 1:11-cv AKH Document 1 Filed 07/01/11 Page 1 of 8 SPRINT UNITED MANAGEMENT COMPANY, Plaintiff, Defendant.

Case 4:11-cv Document 1 Filed 10/12/11 Page 1 of 13 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF DEKALB COUNTY STATE OF GEORGIA

Case 1:16-cv Document 1 Filed 03/31/16 Page 1 of 7

Transcription:

Case 3:11-cv-01217-B Document 8 Filed 06/21/11 Page 1 of 10 PageID 37 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION HYDRO-QUÉBEC, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 3:11-CV-1217 B v. Jury Trial Demanded A123 SYSTEMS, INC. VALENCE TECHNOLOGY, INC., SEGWAY, INC., and TEXAS SEG, LLC, Defendants. Plaintiff Hydro-Québec files this Complaint for Patent Infringement against Defendants А123 Systems, Inc. ( А123 ), Valence Technology, Inc. ( Valence ), Segway, Inc. and Texas Seg, LLC (d/b/a Texas Segway) (collectively The Segway Defendants ) on personal knowledge as to all facts regarding themselves and on information and belief as to all other matters, as follows: I. PRELIMINARY STATEMENT Rechargeable lithium metal phosphate batteries are the world s next generation of electrical power sources, representing billions of dollars of potential sales. That valuable technology was invented and patented by world-renowned scientist and University of Texas ( UT or the University ) faculty member, Dr. John Goodenough, and others working under his direction within UT s Materials Science and Engineering Department. The patents-in-suit U.S. Patent No. 7,955,733 (the 733 Patent ), U.S. Patent No. 7,960,058 (the 058 Patent ) and U.S. Patent No. 7,964,308 (the 308 Patent ) are the most recent iteration of Dr. Goodenough s work with lithium metal phosphate batteries. The 733, 058 and 308 Patents C.A. NO. 3:11-CV-1217 B PAGE 1

Case 3:11-cv-01217-B Document 8 Filed 06/21/11 Page 2 of 10 PageID 38 were assigned to the Board of Regents while they were still applications which, in turn, were assigned to Hydro-Québec prior to their issue. Hydro-Québec s economic interests in the commercialization of the patented technology are threatened by the conduct of the Defendants, who are making and selling the infringing batteries and cathode materials in this District and throughout the United States. By this action, Hydro-Québec seeks to enjoin Defendants from engaging in further acts of infringement, as well as obtain monetary relief for Defendants past wrongful acts. A. Plaintiff II. PARTIES 1. Hydro-Québec is a Canadian crown corporation with its principal place of business in Montréal, Québec. The Province of Québec is the sole shareholder of Hydro- Québec. Hydro-Québec s primary business is generating and distributing electricity to the citizens of Québec and other customers within Canada. B. А123 Systems, Inc. 2. Established in December 2001, А123 is a privately-held Delaware corporation with its principal place of business in Watertown, Massachusetts. A123, through Black & Decker s national distribution channel, is selling Al23 s infringing rechargeable lithium metal phosphate batteries for use in Black & Decker s products, including, but not limited to, the DeWalt line of cordless power tools. In addition to other acts that constitute doing business in Texas, А123 has committed acts of patent infringement in this state. The Court s exercise of personal jurisdiction over А123 would not offend due process because А123 should have foreseen that the injurious effect of its acts would be felt in Texas. Although А123 is doing business in Texas, it has not designated a registered agent for service of process in Texas. C.A. NO. 3:11-CV-1217 B PAGE 2

Case 3:11-cv-01217-B Document 8 Filed 06/21/11 Page 3 of 10 PageID 39 Therefore, А123 may be served by serving the summons and complaint onto А123 s registered agent for service of process in Massachusetts and President, David Р. Vieau, Arsenal on the Charles, 321 Arsenal Street, Watertown, Massachusetts 02472. C. Valence Technology, Inc. 3. Valence, founded in 1989, is a Delaware company. Since 2001, Valence has maintained a principal place of business in Austin, Texas. Valence manufactures and sells several infringing phosphate-based lithium-ion cathode powder and battery products, which it purports to market and sell worldwide. Valence has committed acts of patent infringement in this state and in this district. Valence may be served through its registered agent for service of process, Ross A. Goolsby, 12303 Technology Blvd., Suite 950, Austin, Texas 78727. D. The Segway Defendants 4. Segway, Inc. is a privately-held Delaware corporation with its principal place of business in Bedford, New Hampshire. Segway, Inc. is the national manufacturer, marketer, and distributor of the Segway Personal Transporter and supplies Personal Transporters throughout the United States through distributors in thirty-three states, including Texas, and the District of Columbia. Segway, Inc. through its distribution of different Personal Transporter models is selling infringing rechargeable lithium metal phosphate batteries and powder. The infringing lithium metal phosphate batteries and cathode powder found in the Segway products are manufactured, produced and sold by Valence Technology, Inc., a Delaware corporation with its principle place of business in Austin, Texas. In addition to other acts that constitute doing business in Texas, Segway, Inc. has committed acts of patent infringement in this state. The Court s exercise of personal jurisdiction over Segway, Inc. would not offend due process because Segway, Inc. should have foreseen that the injurious effect of its acts would be felt in Texas. Therefore, Segway, Inc. may be served by serving the summons and complaint onto C.A. NO. 3:11-CV-1217 B PAGE 3

Case 3:11-cv-01217-B Document 8 Filed 06/21/11 Page 4 of 10 PageID 40 Segway s registered agent for service of process in Texas, CT Corporation System, 350 North St. Paul St., Suite 2900, Dallas, TX 75201-4234. 5. Texas Seg, LLC, founded in 2006, is a Texas limited liability company. Texas Seg, LLC is located in Tarrant County, Texas and sells, leases, and rents Segway Personal Transporters, which contain Valence s infringing phosphate-based lithium-ion battery products, including its infringing cathode powder and its infringing batteries. As a result, Texas Seg, LLC has committed acts of patent infringement in this state and in this district. Texas Seg, LLC may be served by serving the summons and complaint through its principal, David Ford, at its principle place of business 8712 Airport Fwy, Hurst, TX 76053-3884. III. JURISDICTION AND VENUE 6. This Court has subject matter jurisdiction over this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1331 and 1338, because Plaintiff s claims arise under the patent laws and other statutes of the United States. 7. This Court has personal jurisdiction over А123 because it is doing business in Texas, and has committed torts inside and outside Texas that have caused harm in this state. Specifically, А123 is manufacturing and selling infringing batteries, which are being marketed for sale in Texas through its internet website and distributed through Black & Decker s established distribution channel in Black & Decker s products, including but not limited to, the DeWalt line of power tools. Plaintiff s claims for patent infringement arise from А123 s infringing activities in the State of Texas and throughout the United States which have caused substantial harm to Hydro-Québec. Further, А123 has received substantial investment funds from several entities licensed to conduct and conducting business in Texas, including Motorola Inc., GE Commercial Finance Technology Lending LLC, and Qualcomm, Inc. In sum, А123 s C.A. NO. 3:11-CV-1217 B PAGE 4

Case 3:11-cv-01217-B Document 8 Filed 06/21/11 Page 5 of 10 PageID 41 conduct and connections with Texas are purposeful and such that it must have reasonably foreseen that it would be sued in Texas by the owner of the patent-in-suit. 8. This Court has personal jurisdiction over Valence because Valence is a citizen of Texas, having a principal place of business in Austin, Texas. Moreover, Valence has committed torts inside and outside Texas that have caused harm in this state. Specifically, Valence is marketing and selling products, which contain infringing lithium metal phosphate batteries throughout the United States, including Dallas County, Texas. Plaintiff s claims for patent infringement arise from Valence s infringing activities in the State of Texas and throughout the United States, which have caused substantial harm to Hydro-Québec. 9. This Court has personal jurisdiction over Segway, Inc. because it is doing business in Texas, and has committed torts inside and outside Texas that have caused harm in this state. Specifically, Segway, Inc. is marketing and selling products, including its Segway Personal Transporters, which contain Valence s infringing lithium metal phosphate batteries, throughout the United States, including a dealership in Tarrant County, Texas. Plaintiff s claims for patent infringement arise from Segway, Inc. s infringing activities in the State of Texas and throughout the United States which have caused substantial harm to Hydro-Québec. In sum, Segway, Inc. s conduct and connections with Texas are purposeful and such that it must have reasonably foreseen that it would be sued in Texas by the owner of the patent-in-suit. 10. This Court has personal jurisdiction over Texas Seg, LLC because it is a citizen of Texas, having a principal place of business in Hurst, Texas. Moreover, Texas Seg, LLC has committed torts inside and outside Texas that have caused harm in this state. Specifically, Texas Seg, LLC is marketing and selling products, which contain infringing lithium metal phosphate batteries throughout Texas, including Tarrant County, Texas. Plaintiff s claims for patent C.A. NO. 3:11-CV-1217 B PAGE 5

Case 3:11-cv-01217-B Document 8 Filed 06/21/11 Page 6 of 10 PageID 42 infringement arise from Texas Seg, LLC s infringing activities in the State of Texas and throughout the United States, which have caused substantial harm to Hydro-Québec. 11. Venue is proper in this District pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1391(b) and 1400(b). IV. COUNT 1 - INFRINGEMENT OF U.S. PATENT NOS. 7,955,733 AND 7,960,058 12. Plaintiff realleges and incorporates the allegations set forth in the preceding paragraphs as if set forth in full herein. 13. On June 7, 2011, United States Patent No. 7,955,733 (the 733 Patent ) entitled CATHODE MATERIALS FOR SECONDARY (RECHARGEABLE) LITHIUM BATTERIES, was duly and legally issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. 14. On June 14, 2011, United States Patent No. 7,960,058 (the 058 Patent ) entitled CATHODE MATERIALS FOR SECONDARY (RECHARGEABLE) LITHIUM BATTERIES, was duly and legally issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. 15. On June 21, 2011, United States Patent No. 7,964,308 (the 308 Patent ) entitled CATHODE MATERIALS FOR SECONDARY (RECHARGEABLE) LITHIUM BATTERIES, was duly and legally issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. 16. Hydro-Québec is the assignee and an owner of the right, title and interest in and to the 733 Patent, the 058 Patent and the 308 Patent, including the right to assert all causes of action arising under said patents and the right to remedies for infringement of said patents. 17. A123 has directly infringed, engaged in acts of contributory infringement and/or induced the infringement of one or more claims of the 733, 058 and 308 Patents by manufacturing, having manufactured, using, importing into the United States, selling and/or offering to sell cathodes and secondary battery products that embody, incorporate and/or practice one or more of those claims. Such battery products include, but are not limited to, the AMP 20 C.A. NO. 3:11-CV-1217 B PAGE 6

Case 3:11-cv-01217-B Document 8 Filed 06/21/11 Page 7 of 10 PageID 43 Prismatic Cell, the AHR32113 Cell, the ANR26550 Cell, and the APR18650 Cell, as well as modules and systems made by A123 containing these cells. 18. Valence has directly infringed, engaged in acts of contributory infringement and/or induced the infringement of one or more claims of the 733, 058 and 308 Patents by manufacturing, having manufactured, using, importing into the United States, selling and/or offering to sell secondary battery products that embody, incorporate and/or practice one or more of those claims. Such battery products include, but are not limited to, the U-charge and Saphion batteries. 19. Segway Defendants have directly infringed and/or engaged in acts of contributory infringement of one or more claims of both the 733, 058 and 308 Patents by using, marketing, selling and/or offering to sell the Segway Personal Transporters, which contain Valence s infringing lithium metal phosphate battery products. Such battery products include, but are not limited to, the U-charge and Saphion batteries. 20. Hydro-Québec has implemented a well-conceived, efficient, and effective plan for commercializing the patented lithium metal phosphate battery technology. Specifically, Hydro- Québec currently licenses Phostech Lithium, Inc. and Sony Corporation to practice, make, use, or sell the inventions in which it has exclusive rights. Each of those license agreements is carefully-crafted with respect to the specific field of use in which the licensee may use Hydro- Québec s rights in the Goodenough Patent. Indeed, Sony recently announced that it had commenced shipping secondary batteries with the patented olivine-type lithium metal phosphate cathodes in June 2009. Those batteries are intended for use in motor-driven devices such as power tools, and in a wide range of mobile electronic devices such as mobile phones and netbooks. C.A. NO. 3:11-CV-1217 B PAGE 7

Case 3:11-cv-01217-B Document 8 Filed 06/21/11 Page 8 of 10 PageID 44 21. Defendants infringing activities threaten to harm Hydro-Québec irreparably by destroying its plan for commercializing the Goodenough Patent. 22. The balance of equities favors Hydro-Québec. It owns and controls the rights to commercialize and reap the benefits from the production of patented lithium metal phosphate cathodes. In the absence of an injunction, Hydro-Québec s carefully-formulated plan for commercializing the patented technology through a few highly-qualified manufacturers and sellers will be destroyed, as will be the goodwill associated with the Goodenough Patent. Without injunctive relief, Hydro-Québec will lose its right to control the quality and purity of the patented cathodes in the lithium metal phosphate batteries now being distributed to the public. That control is of critical importance to Hydro-Québec, given that the market for lithium metal phosphate battery products has gained commercial traction, and initial positive public response will help to drive future acceptance by a greater number of consumers. 23. Therefore, Plaintiff respectfully requests that this Court issue preliminary and permanent injunctions prohibiting Defendants and their officers, directors, employees, agents, subsidiaries, affiliates, and all those in active concert with them, from: (a) infringing, contributing to the infringement, or inducing the infringement of the 733 Patent, the 058 Patent or the 308 Patent; and (b) making, having made, using, selling, offering for sale, or importing any cathodes or battery products, systems, or component parts embodying, incorporating and/or practicing any of the inventions described and claimed in the 733 Patent, the 058 Patent or the 308 Patent, including, but not limited to, any other battery products using olivine lithium metal phosphate. 24. In addition to preliminary and permanent injunctive relief to prevent Defendants from engaging in further acts of infringement in violation of the 733 Patent, 058 Patent or the C.A. NO. 3:11-CV-1217 B PAGE 8

Case 3:11-cv-01217-B Document 8 Filed 06/21/11 Page 9 of 10 PageID 45 308 Patent, Plaintiff seeks an award of monetary damages to compensate it fully for the injuries it has sustained as a result of Defendants infringement of one or more claims of the 733, 058 and 308 Patents. 25. Accordingly, pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 284, Plaintiff seeks an award of damages in the amount assessed by the jury to compensate it for Defendants infringement, but, in no event, less than a reasonable royalty for the use made of the invention by Defendants, together with interest and costs as determined by the Court. 26. On information and belief, Defendants are aware of the 733, 058 and 308 Patents and the applications leading to the 733, 058 and 308 Patents, and Defendants infringing activities are willful. V. JURY DEMAND Plaintiff hereby requests a jury trial on all matters so triable under the Constitution, laws, or statutes of the United States. VI. RELIEF REQUESTED Considering the premises, Plaintiff requests that this Court enter judgment in its favor and against Defendants, providing for the following relief: a. Preliminary and permanent injunctive relief against Defendants, their agents, representatives, employees, and servants, and all persons and entities in concert or participation with them, requiring them to cease and refrain from making, using and/or selling the patented technology or any product containing the patented technology in violation of Plaintiff s rights under the 733 Patent, the 058 Patent and the 308 Patent; C.A. NO. 3:11-CV-1217 B PAGE 9

Case 3:11-cv-01217-B Document 8 Filed 06/21/11 Page 10 of 10 PageID 46 b. Actual damages in an amount to be determined at trial; c. Increased damages pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 284; d. Reasonable and necessary attorneys fees incurred by Plaintiff in connection with this action pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 285; e. Prejudgment and post-judgment interest at the highest rate(s) allowed by law; f. Costs of court; and g. Such other and further relief which this Court may deem just and proper. Dated: June 21, 2011 Respectfully submitted, By: /s/ James W. Cannon James W. Cannon (TX Bar No. 03746600) Kevin J. Meek (TX Bar No. 13899600) Darryl J. Adams (TX Bar No. 00796101) BAKER BOTTS L.L.P. 98 San Jacinto Boulevard, Suite 1500 Austin, Texas 78701 Telephone: 512.322.2500 Facsimile: 512.322.2501 jim.cannon@bakerbotts.com kevin.meek@bakerbotts.com darryl.adams@bakerbotts.com Ryan Bangert (TX Bar No. 2405446) BAKER BOTTS L.L.P. 2001 Ross Avenue Dallas, Texas 75201-2980 Telephone: 214.953.6500 Facsimile: 214.953.6503 ryan.bangert@bakerbotts.com ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF, HYDRO-QUÉBEC C.A. NO. 3:11-CV-1217 B PAGE 10