How Can I Differentiate Reading Instruction for Students Experiencing Persistent Reading Difficulties?

Similar documents
Teaching All Students to Read: With Strong Intervention Outcomes

Requirements EDAM WORD STUDY K-3: PRINT AWARENESS, LETTER KNOWLEDGE, PHONICS, AND HIGH FREQUENCY WORDS

READING WITH. Reading with Pennsylvania Reading Specialist Certificate

Using Direct Instruction Programs as Intervention Programs in Grades K 3

Scientifically Based Reading Programs: What are they and how do I know?

Facilitated Modules 60 inservice credits. Assessment and Evaluation 60 inservice credits Facilitated

Reading Competencies

Nevis Public School District #308. District Literacy Plan Minnesota Statute 120B.12, Learning together... Achieving quality together.

INTENSIVE READING INTERVENTIONS FOR STRUGGLING READERS IN EARLY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL. A Principal s Guide

Students with Reading Problems Their Characteristics and Needs

Pre-Requisites EDAM-5001 Early Literacy Guiding Principles and Language

A Principal s Guide to Intensive Reading Interventions for Struggling Readers in Reading First Schools

Scientifically Based Reading Programs. Marcia L. Kosanovich, Ph.D. Florida Center for Reading Research SLP Academy Fall, 2005

St. Petersburg College. RED 4335/Reading in the Content Area. Florida Reading Endorsement Competencies 1 & 2. Reading Alignment Matrix

Phonics and Word Work

Program Overview. This guide discusses Language Central for Math s program components, instructional design, and lesson features.

Selecting Research Based Instructional Programs

Targeted Reading Intervention for Students in Grades K-6 Reading results. Imagine the possibilities.

How To Teach Reading

Planning and Evaluation Tool for Effective Schoolwide Reading Programs - Revised (PET-R)

AND LEARNING 21st Century Teaching and Learning

1 REVISOR C. show verification of completing a Board of Teaching preparation program

K-12 Comprehensive Research Based Reading Plans District: Dade

Reading Street and English Language Learners

Revised Publishers Criteria for the Common Core State Standards in English Language Arts and Literacy, Grades K 2

Ohio Legislative Service Commission

Foundation Paper Supporting Special Education Students with READ 180

Response to Intervention Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

Pasco County Schools. Add-On Program. Reading K-12. Endorsement

Designing Lessons for Diverse Learners by Natalie Olinghouse 2008

School Based Support Teams SUPPORTING STUDENTS IN THE LEAST RESTRICTIVE ENVIRONMENT

READ 180 Aligns to Enhancing Education Through Technology Criteria (With Professional Development from Scholastic Red )

BEST PRACTICES RESOURCE GUIDE for ELEMENTARY, MIDDLE, and HIGH SCHOOLS

Reading Results with

Principles of Data-Driven Instruction

A Consumer s Guide to Evaluating a Core Reading Program Grades K-3: A Critical Elements Analysis

Unit/Lesson Planning Guide: Key Questions to Consider While Planning

LAKE SILVER ELEMENTARY

Instructional Design: Objectives, Curriculum and Lesson Plans for Reading Sylvia Linan-Thompson, The University of Texas at Austin Haitham Taha,

Standards for Special Education Teachers

TEAM PLANNING AND REPORTING

21st Century Community Learning Center

Master of Science in Education Major in Early Childhood Literacy Online Graduate Education for Today s Teacher

CALIFORNIA S TEACHING PERFORMANCE EXPECTATIONS (TPE)

Identifying Students with Specific Learning Disabilities. Part 1: Introduction/Laws & RtI in Relation to SLD Identification

Criteria for Evaluating Instructional Materials in Science, Kindergarten Through Grade Eight

Right into Reading. Program Overview Intervention Appropriate K 3+ A Phonics-Based Reading and Comprehension Program

GUIDELINES FOR THE IEP TEAM DATA COLLECTION &

THE FRAMEWORK FOR A TEACHER INTERN CERTIFICATION PROGRAM: SPECIFIC PROGRAM GUIDELINES PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION

PAMELA MASLIN. Permission to reproduced this work for personal or classroom use is granted,

Language Reading Connection

Oral Fluency Assessment

Effectiveness of Direct Strategy Instruction through SIOP

Develop Struggling Readers Skills, Grades 3 Adult

The University of North Carolina at Pembroke Academic Catalog

Standard Two: Knowledge of Mathematics: The teacher shall be knowledgeable about mathematics and mathematics instruction.

INTEGRATING THE COMMON CORE STANDARDS INTO INTERACTIVE, ONLINE EARLY LITERACY PROGRAMS

Prentice Hall. California Edition of Algebra 1 - Classics Edition (Smith/Charles) Grade 8

WiggleWorks Aligns to Title I, Part A

Professional Development Needs Assessment for Teachers

Learning Today Smart Tutor Supports English Language Learners

South Carolina Literacy Competencies. for Reading Coaches

Selecting an Intervention to Meet Students Needs: A How-to Resource for Educators

Pre-service Performance Assessment Professional Standards for Teachers: See 603 CMR 7.08

cvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmq wertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyui opasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfg hjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxc

The National Reading Panel: Five Components of Reading Instruction Frequently Asked Questions

Talent Development Secondary Assessment, Curriculum, and Instruction Blueprint Practices to Support a Culture of Success

Curriculum and Instruction

Dr. Scott T. Ebbrecht Director, Assessment and Alternative Education

Reading Instruction and Reading Achievement Among ELL Students

Ch. 4: Four-Step Problem Solving Model

Standards of Quality and Effectiveness for Professional Teacher Preparation Programs APPENDIX A

Balanced Literacy in Seattle Public Schools

Part 1: Support of CCSS ELA Standards

TAS Instructional Program Design/ Scientifically-based Instructional Strategies

Mastery approaches to mathematics and the new national curriculum

RATING A TEACHER OBSERVATION TOOL. Five ways to ensure classroom observations are focused and rigorous

TEACHING ALL STUDENTS TO READ IN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL. A Guide for Principals

Comprehensive Reading Plan K-12 A Supplement to the North Carolina Literacy Plan. North Carolina Department of Public Instruction

International Baccalaureate Middle Years Programme (IB MYP)

APPENDIX A: Examples of Observations and Documentation

District 2854 Ada-Borup Public Schools. Reading Well By Third Grade Plan. For. Ada-Borup Public Schools. Drafted April 2012

the sites selected for participation in the study were targeted Assistance schools with a history of unacceptably low achievement.

Key Principles for ELL Instruction (v6)

Sitton Spelling & Word Skills Program Overview Grades K 8

Second Grade Core Knowledge Addendum

Debbie Hepplewhite s suggestions for effective and supportive phonics provision and practice

APPENDIX B CHECKLISTS

Reading K 12 Section 35

DR. PAT MOSSMAN Tutoring

Reading Endorsement Inservice Add-on Certification Program

SPECIFIC LEARNING DISABILITY

C Reading Sufficiency Act - Programs of Reading Instruction

NW COLORADO BOCES ALTERNATIVE LICENSURE PROGRAM

3rd Grade Reading Standard Exceeds (4) Secure (3) Developing (2) Beginning (1)

Correlation Map of LEARNING-FOCUSED to Marzano s Evaluation Model

I. School- Wide DL Components


Understanding Types of Assessment Within an RTI Framework

Effective Sheltered Instruction Strategies

Transcription:

How Can I Differentiate Reading Instruction for Students Experiencing Persistent Reading Difficulties? Donna Crocker donna.crocker@ocps.net Becky Finn elizabeth.finn@ocps.net FDLRS Action Resource Center serving: Lake, Osceola, Orange, Seminole & Sumter Terri Korn terri.korn@ocps.net OCPS Instructional Support Adam Palmese adam.palmese@ocps.net OCPS Assistant Principal Just Read, Florida! Leadership Conference June 2008 1

Students With Reading Difficulties 5-10% A student experiencing difficulty with reading needs a highly skilled teacher who can effectively use programs developed from scientifically based reading research. In addition, this student requires a positive and respectful learning environment with instruction that is differentiated to precisely meet his or her needs. The differentiation must be based on assessment and clarity of the learning goals to ensure that lessons are not only engaging but at all times instructionally relevant. Persistent Reading Difficulties Students With Reading Difficulties Most Students Students With Persistent Reading Difficulties 1-5% A student with reading difficulties will further benefit when instruction is made more explicit and intense. This is important for any student experiencing problems but is essential for the small percentage of students having persistent reading difficulties. These students require adequate time for instruction with differentiated lessons precisely developed from ongoing assessment. Lessons should include conspicuous strategies, strategically integrated skills, scaffolded instruction, and judicious review delivered with appropriate pacing, engagement, monitoring, and correction. The majority of students will learn to read and will make continuing progress when taught by a highly skilled teacher who effectively uses programs and strategies developed from scientifically based reading research. CCRP Goal = 80-90% Adapted from Horner & Sugai, 2006 2

Why do some students continue to have difficulty reading even though they receive instruction in a research-based program with a skilled teacher? Approximately 3-5% of students in a school or classroom may experience significant difficulty learning to read even if they are being taught by a skilled teacher who uses a core reading program that has been developed using scientifically based reading research. Why are some students not successful in their core reading program? There are too many lesson activities and the teacher s manual does not give clear guidance on what is the most essential. The teacher must be able to identify the most important tasks, match the important tasks to learner needs based on assessment, and also schedule time so priority is given to the essential tasks. The language of instruction doesn t match learner needs. Many reading programs do not carefully control the vocabulary or grammar that the teacher uses when presenting information. Many students with significant difficulty learning to read are confused by terms or directions that are used in instruction. New information and skills are introduced at a rate that is too fast for the 3-5% of students that are experiencing significant difficulty and/or skills are introduced in sequences that are confusing. Teachers have to be prepared to analyze teaching strategies, identify component skills, and create very explicit teaching demonstrations with appropriate amounts of scaffolding. There isn t enough practice and judicious review built into the program. For children in grades 2-5 who are significantly behind, the core program may not provide explicit and systematic teaching of skills from previous grades. Even if the core has an intervention component, it may only provide extra practice on skills being taught at that grade level. Students who cannot read grade-level materials with at least 85% accuracy may be classified significantly behind and may need explicit instruction on skills from previous grades. 3

Why Do Students Have Difficulty Learning to Read? Alterable Unalterable Instructionally Relevant Irrelevant 4

Mr. Avery Questions to Ponder Mrs. Barnes Is this teacher working hard? Is this teacher s instruction based on on-going assessment? Is this teacher s instruction explicit? Would most students likely make progress with this teacher s instruction? Would students experiencing difficulties in reading make progress with this teacher s instruction? 5

Instruction for students experiencing reading difficulties is more effective when a teacher: Provides instruction on whatever component skills are deficient: phonemic awareness, phonics, fluency, vocabulary, reading comprehension strategies Provides ample opportunities for guided of new skills Provides cueing of appropriate strategies in context Provides appropriate levels of as children learn to apply new skills Provides a significant increase in of instruction 6

What makes Instruction Systematic and Explicit? Differentiating to Make Instruction Explicit Systematic Design Principles 1. Strategies 2. Scaffolding 3. Integration of Skills 4. Background knowledge 5. Review Teacher Methods to Increase Intensity 1. Student Response 2. Pacing 3. Time 4. Corrections and Feedback 5. Group Instruction 6. Monitoring 7

Systematic Design of Instruction: Conspicuous Strategies Planned Purposeful Mediated Scaffolding Programmatic Responsive Strategic Integration Involves relationships among concepts Links big ideas across lessons within a curriculum Primed Background Knowledge Aligns with learner knowledge and expertise Considers preskills Readies learner for successful performance Judicious Review Sufficient Cumulative Judicious, not haphazard 8

Teacher Delivery Methods to Increase Intensity: Frequent Student Response Highly Aids in student attention Appropriate Pacing Tasks need to be presented at a pace to keep learners. Provide adequate processing time! and Adequate Time Provide maximum time to achieve goals Provide more intensive instruction as indicated by data Positive Immediate Corrections and Feedback Students should be brought to mastery on task. Errors must be viewed as. Positive Correction Procedure: Model Lead Test Retest (repeat as necessary) Small Group Instruction Membership is based on as indicated by Group size Lowest performing seated in and Meet daily Careful assessment Precise Monitoring and to student responses provides key information. - when all students in group can perform all tasks with few errors 9

Professional Development Alternatives for Exceptional Student Educators, (PDA-ESE) is a Florida Department of Education online professional development program. The purpose of PDA-ESE is to increase teacher knowledge and skills through a "user-friendly" online delivery format with group meetings and support from an experienced facilitator. There are currently eight PDA-ESE modules available. Foundations of Exceptional Education Assessment and Evaluation Instructional Practices Positive Behavior Support Language Development and Communication Skills Interpersonal Interactions and Participation Transition Differentiating Reading Instruction for Students: Making It Explicit Each module is worth 60 in-service points, with the exception of the Interpersonal Interactions and Participation module, which is worth 30 points. Seven modules are correlated to the competencies used to develop the ESE K-12 certification coverage, which became effective in Florida in July 2002. Differentiating Reading Instruction for Students: Making It Explicit, is approved by the Just Read, Florida office to satisfy the requirements of competency four and five of the reading endorsement. The PDA-ESE Modules are offered at no cost to Florida educators. PDA-ESE is coordinated by the Florida Diagnostic and Learning Resources System (FDLRS). Participants enroll in modules through their local FDLRS Center. Visit the www.pda-ese.org website to learn more about the modules or to locate the FDLRS Center for your school district. Additional questions: Your local FDLRS center Mary Ann Ahearn ahearnm@nefec.org Susan O Rear susan.o rear@ocps.net The PDA-ESE Project was originally funded through a U.S. Department of Education Teacher Quality Enhancement Grant under Title II of the Higher Education Act. This project was designed through a collaborative effort of the Division of Professional Educators, Bureau of Educator Certification, and the Bureau of Exceptional Education and Student Services (BEESS). BEESS continues to fund the implementation of the modules. 10

Differentiating Reading Instruction for Students: Making It Explicit Students experiencing difficulty in learning to read, or reading to learn, do not all look alike. Students may struggle in one area of reading and find more success in another. Students may have mild, isolated, or temporary problems with reading or may experience significant and persistent difficulty requiring support throughout their years in school. This population may include, but not be limited to, students with identified disabilities or students who are English Language Learners. Research is clear that differentiated lessons, using explicit instruction, are essential for K-12 students who are experiencing any level of reading difficulty. This module will focus on how to use the guidelines for differentiation and strategies to support differentiation to improve instruction for all students. It will also emphasize a variety of ways to make instruction more explicit and intensive to achieve optimal results for students with reading difficulties, especially those who experience significant or persistent challenges in learning to read or in reading to learn. The majority of students will learn to read and will make continuing progress when taught by a highly skilled teacher who effectively uses programs and strategies developed from scientifically-based reading research. A student experiencing any level of difficulty with reading needs a highly skilled teacher who can effectively use programs developed from scientifically-based reading research. In addition, this student requires a positive and respectful learning environment with instruction that is differentiated to precisely meet his or her needs. The differentiation must be based on assessment and clarity of the learning goals to ensure that lessons are not only engaging, but, at all times, instructionally relevant. A student with reading difficulties will further benefit when instruction is made more explicit and intense. This is important for any student experiencing problems, but is essential for the small percentage of students having persistent reading difficulties. These students require adequate time for instruction with differentiated lessons precisely developed from on-going assessment. Lessons should include conspicuous strategies, strategically integrated skills, scaffolded instruction, and judicious review delivered with appropriate pacing, engagement, monitoring, and correction. 11

Unit 1: Research, Reading Difficulties, and Resources 1. The History of Reading Instruction 2. Reading Development 3. Reading Difficulties 4. Florida's Reading Initiatives and Resources 5. Additional Reading, Resources and References Unit 2: How to Create a Differentiated Environment and Make Instruction Explicit 1. The Basics of Differentiation for All Students 2. Strategies That Support a Differentiated Environment for All Students 3. Explicit Instruction to Differentiate for Students with Reading Difficulties 4. Additional Reading, Resources and References Unit 3: Targeting Student Needs and Designing Data-Based Solutions 1. The Purpose of Assessment 2. Types of Reading Tests 3. Models of Reading Assessment 4. Reading Assessment in Florida 5. Using Assessment to Guide Differentiation of Instruction 6. Additional Reading, Resources and References Unit 4: Differentiating Phonological Awareness Instruction for Students Experiencing Reading Difficulties 1. Introduction to Phonological Awareness: Activating Your Background Knowledge PH Words 2. Why Is Phonological Awareness (Including Phonemic Awareness) So Important? The Link to Research 3. Phonological Awareness (Including Phonemic Awareness) Instruction 4. Phonological Awareness: When There Are Difficulties 5. Differentiating Phonological Awareness Instruction Through Explicitness and Intensity 6. Differentiating Instruction Using Teacher Delivery to Increase Intensity 7. Technology That Can Help 8. Setting Goals for Instruction Based on Assessment 9. Additional Reading, Resources and References Unit 5: Differentiating Phonics Instruction for Students Experiencing Reading Difficulties 1. Accessing Background Knowledge: What Is Phonics and Why Is It Important? 12

2. Phonics Instruction 3. Differentiating Phonics Instruction through Explicit Instruction 4. Differentiation through Teacher Delivery Methods 5. Technology That Can Help 6. Setting Goals for Phonics Instruction Based on Assessment 7. Additional Reading, Resources and References Unit 6: Assessing and Building Reading Fluency for Students Experiencing Reading Difficulties 1. Defining Fluency 2. Automaticity and Working Memory 3. The Reasons for Reading Dysfluency 4. The Link Between Reading Fluency and Reading Proficiency 5. Improving Reading Fluency Through Differentiation of Assessment and Instruction 6. Other Resources for Assessing and Developing Reading Fluency 7. Technology That Can Help 8. Additional Reading, Resources and References Unit 7: Teaching Vocabulary Explicitly for Students Experiencing Reading Difficulties 1. Accessing Background Knowledge: Why Is Vocabulary Instruction Important? 2. Vocabulary Instruction 3. Teaching an Explicit Vocabulary Lesson 4. Setting Goals for Vocabulary Instruction Based on Assessment 5. Technology That Can Help 6. Additional Reading, Resources and References Unit 8: Explicit Comprehension Instruction for Students Having Reading Difficulties 1. The Goal of Reading Instruction 2. Defining Reading Comprehension 3. Proficient Reading Comprehension 4. Factors Contributing to Difficulty with Reading Comprehension 5. Differentiation through Explicit Reading Comprehension Instruction 6. Comprehension at the Sentence Level 7. Differentiating Comprehension Strategy Instruction 8. Comprehension Before, During, and After Reading 9. Content Area Literacy 10. Assessment of Reading Comprehension for Differentiating Instruction 11. Technology That Can Help 12. Additional Reading, Resources and References 13