Physicians on Medical Malpractice Reform Options



Similar documents
Georgia Board for Physician Workforce

Medical Liability Task Force

QUESTION NO. 3. Amendment to Titles 1 and 3 of the Nevada Revised Statutes. CONDENSATION (ballot question)

Bracing for change Medical professional liability (MPL) insurance costs at a crossroads

The End of Malpractice Litigation? Improving Care and Communications to Reduce Risk

Testimony Before: Senate Codes, Health & Insurance Committees. 10:00 a.m. Hearing Room B, Legislative Office Building Albany, NY

Personal Injury Law: Minnesota Medical Malpractice

Malpractice Reform: In Search of an Approach that is Rational, Fair, and Promotes Quality Improvement

ALASKA TORT REFORM SURVEY

Drug and Alcohol Testing of Doctors. Medical Negligence Lawsuits. Initiative Statute.

A COSTLY DEFENSE: PHYSICIANS SOUND OFF ON THE HIGH PRICE OF DEFENSIVE MEDICINE IN THE U.S. By Jackson Healthcare

Arizona State Senate Issue Paper June 22, 2010 MEDICAL MALPRACTICE. Statute of Limitations. Note to Reader: INTRODUCTION

MEDIATION AND ARBITRATION OF MEDICAL MALPRACTICE DISPUTES: TIME FOR A POSITIVE CHANGE

Pension & Health Benefits Committee California Public Employees Retirement System

Public Policy Position

Tort Reform in Utah: Disclosure, Apology and Resolution

Drug and Alcohol Testing of Doctors. Medical Negligence Lawsuits. Initiative Statute.

Medical Malpractice Reform

Kansas Health Care Stabilization Fund General Information (As of July 1, 2014)

How To Pass A Bill In The United States

Medical malpractice Update

Guide to Malpractice Insurance for Naturopathic Physicians

Common Myths About Personal Injury and Wrongful Death Cases 1. By B. Keith Williams

This briefing paper summarizes the measures the Montana Legislature has put into place to improve the state's medical liability climate.

Massachusetts Legislature Reforms Medical Malpractice Legislation to Promote Apologies and Encourage Settlements

2015 IADC Mid-Year Meeting. Marco Island, Florida. Medical Liability and Health Law Committee Meeting

Cardelli Lanfear P.C.

Update on SB3, The Georgia Tort Reform Law (Updated 3/22/2010)

WASHINGTON COLLEGE OF LAW, AMERICAN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL LIABILITY & PUBLIC HEALTH PROFESSOR STEVEN M. PAVSNER SYLLABUS

Senate Bill No. 292 Senator Roberson

IMPROVING SETTLEMENT SAVVY. Kathy Perkins Kathy Perkins LLC, Workplace Law & Mediation

PROCEDURAL PROVISIONS IN NEVADA MEDICAL MALPRACTICE REFORM. Carl Tobias*

McLAUGHLIN & ASSOCIATES GEORGIA PHYSICIAN SURVEY DECEMBER 11, 2013


Advocate Magazine March Why medical malpractice still matters.

WHAT HAPPENS IN A PERSONAL INJURY CASE

Anatomy of a Medical Malpractice Case

Introduction to Medical Malpractice Insurance

Evaluation of Options for Medical Malpractice

BACKGROUND. August 28, Hon. Kamala D. Harris Attorney General 1300 I Street, 17 th Floor Sacramento, California Initiative Coordinator

October 9, Honorable Orrin G. Hatch United States Senate Washington, DC Dear Senator:

Medical professional liability (MPL) insurance costs at a crossroads

L E G I S L A T I V E A N A L Y S T S O F F I C E. Assembly Judiciary Committee Hon. Bob Wieckowski, Chair

Communication to Prevent and Respond to Medical Injuries: WA State Collaborative

HOUSE BILL NO. HB0106. Medical malpractice-use of expert witnesses. A BILL. for. AN ACT relating to medical malpractice actions; providing

Maryland Insurance Administration s 2005 Report on the Availability and Affordability of Health Care Medical Professional Liability Insurance in

Medical Malpractice Reform: Fair and Just Compensation for All

Commonly Used Terms in Auto Accident Cases

ADVANCE DIRECTIVE VOLUME 19 SPRING 2010 PAGES The Effect of Medical Malpractice. Jonathan Thomas *

HOW MUCH MONEY IS WORTH? MY SLIP AND FALL CASE

H.R. 5 Help Efficient, Accessible, Low-cost, Timely Healthcare (HEALTH) Act of 2003

SECTION 1. Chapter 671, Hawaii Revised Statutes, is. amended by adding five new sections to be appropriately

No-Fault Automobile Insurance

MEDICAL MALPRACTICE CLOSED CLAIM DATA COLLECTION UNDER CONNECTICUT PUBLIC ACT

Evaluating a Medical Malpractice Case

The Malpractice Lawsuit:

Mitigating Legal and Ethical Risks. Conflict of Interest. Goals. True or False. True or False

THE BENEVOLENT GESTURE MEDICAL PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY ACT (THE "APOLOGY STATUTE") SB 379

MEDICAL MALPRACTICE LITIGATION: PLAINTIFF S PERSPECTIVE

Minnesota Professional & Medical Malpractice Law. Professional & Medical Malpractice Law

Reed Armstrong Quarterly

Anatomy Of A Medical Malpractice Lawsuit

Preferred Physicians Medical.

Brief Overview of MMPR Requirements What are the elements of the elements of a reportable medical malpractice payment

RAND Health. WR-966 May a working paper. is a registered trademark.

Medical Litigation in 2012

How To Get A Medical Insurance Policy For A Surgical Mesh

S Encourages Providers and Insurers to Voluntarily Report Medical Errors, Apologize and Make Good-faith Offers of Compensation

ATTORNEY HELP CENTER: MEDICAL MALPRACTICE

FURR & HENSHAW.

ASSEMBLY BILL No. 597

STATEMENT OF CHERYL NIRO. Incoming Member, Standing Committee on Medical Professional Liability Member, House of Delegates

Kansas Legislator Briefing Book 2016

Illinois General Assembly passes historic medical malpractice reform bill

Department of Legislative Services Maryland General Assembly 2004 Session

Kansas Legislator Briefing Book 2015

PLICO RISK MANAGEMENT PRESENTS

Medical Malpractice VOIR DIRE QUESTIONS

Medical Malpractice BAD DOCTORS. G. Randall Green, MD, JD St. Joseph s Hospital Health Center Syracuse, New York

Bracing for change Medical Professional Liability (MPL) insurance costs at a crossroads

CHBA Briefing Note on Liability in the Residential Building Industry

RIGHT Lawyers. Stacy Rocheleau, Esq. Gary Thompson, Esq.

A GUIDE TO PURCHASING LAWYER S PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY INSURANCE IN VIRGINIA

ADDENDUM NO. 1 TO RFP : Locum Tenens Referrals

CHAPTER 4. Attorney General Contracting for Tort Defense Decreases. Wyoming Governmental Claims Act Created Need for State Tort Defense

IT S OK TO SAY I M SORRY. Anything you say can and will be used against you in a court of law.

MEDICAL MALPRACTICE INTERVIEW

50TH LEGISLATURE - STATE OF NEW MEXICO - SECOND SESSION, 2012

Medical Malpractice Litigation. What to Expect as a Defendant

2013 IL App (3d) U. Order filed September 23, 2013 IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS THIRD DISTRICT A.D., 2013

Position Statement on Medical Liability Reform

What the Jury Hears in Products Liability Litigation. The View From Both Sides and the Middle

RESOLUTION Injured Patients and Families Compensation Fund. Health Insurance Coverage and Access

LOUISIANA PERSONAL INJURY ACCIDENT BASICS

Darryl S. Weiman, M.D., J.D.

Tort and Casualty. Tort and Casualty. Recovery Case Managers Sandy Drews Ron Vialpando. Investigator Deborah Sorensen

ILLINOIS LAW MANUAL CHAPTER X SETTLEMENTS & RELEASES. Prior to July 1, 2003, there were in existence at least eight (8) lien statutes that

Transcription:

Physicians on Medical Malpractice Reform Options Survey Methodology This survey was conducted online from August 31 October 31, 2012. Invitations for the survey were emailed to physicians who have been placed by Jackson Healthcare staffing companies and those who have not. Respondents were self-selected with 1,548 respondents completing the survey. The error range for this survey at the 95 percent confidence level is +/- 2.5 percent. Survey Questionnaire The purpose of this survey is to understand how effective the various proposed or implemented medical malpractice reforms are / would be in reducing the practice of defensive medicine. Prior to asking about the reforms, we need some information from you to help us understand the lens through which you view medical malpractice reform. Q1) Which of the following best describes how your medical malpractice insurance premiums are paid? I pay my own medical malpractice premiums. (1) My employer provides medical malpractice insurance. (2) Other. Please specify. (3) Merriam Webster defines defensive medicine as "the practice of ordering medical tests, procedures or consultations of doubtful value to protect the prescribing physician from malpractice suits." Q2) Do you currently practice any defensive medicine? Yes (1) No (2) If No Is Selected, Then Skip To End of Survey

Q2a. In previous surveys we've done, doctors have cited the following reasons they and their peers practice defensive medicine. Which of the following describe your reasons for practicing defensive medicine? Please choose all that apply To avoid being named in a potential lawsuit. (1) I have been named in a medical malpractice lawsuit, and do not wish to repeat the experience. (2) Colleagues have been named in (a) medical malpractice lawsuit(s), and I saw what they went through to defend themselves. I don't want that to happen to me. (3) To protect my good name: I do not wish to risk my reputation. (4) I do not want to risk my personal finances. (5) Patient or family demands or expectations that everything humanly possible be done. (6) Fear of missing something. I don't want to make a mistake. I don't want to be wrong. (7) Peer pressure. Other doctors of my specialty are doing it, and I'm afraid I'll look "deficient" by comparison if I do not. (8) Defensive medicine has become the new "standard of care". (9) I was trained to practice defensively. (10) To improve public or private patient satisfaction scores. (11) To adhere to the standard of perfection to which patients hold doctors. Any bad result is the doctor's fault. (12) To save time. (13) Defensive medicine is good medicine. I'm protecting my patients by doing everything I can for them. (14) Other. Please specify. (15) 2b. The reasons you cited for practicing defensive medicine appear below. Of those, which is the main reason you practice defensive medicine?

Q5) These are the medical malpractice reforms being considered in many state legislatures. Which of the following reforms do you think would be effective in reducing the amount of defensive Please choose all that apply. Caps on Non-Economic Damages: Limit the amount of money that a plaintiff can take as an award for non-economic losses, or "pain and suffering", in a malpractice suit. The cap may apply to the plaintiff, limiting the amount he or she may receive, or to each defendant, limiting the total amount for which each may be liable. (1) Disclosure, Apologize and Offer: Physicians have the opportunity to disclose their mistakes to patients and offer them swift, fair compensation in the hopes of opening lines of communication and avoiding litigation. Patients who accept the offer agree not to take further legal action; patients who do not accept may still pursue litigation. (2) Physician Safe Harbors: Provides a legal defense to medical malpractice claims if a defendant health care provider can show that an applicable, credible clinical practice guideline was followed in caring for the plaintiff. (3) Health Courts: Specialty courts designed to bring medical expertise to the malpractice decisionmaking process. While there are several versions of health courts proposed in the policy discourse, most proposals combine specialty-trained judges with independent (generally neutral) medical experts to oversee an expedited proceeding informed by evidence. There is no jury in this process, but there is still a trial. Often health court proposals suggest damages should be calculated based on a previously-agreed upon schedule and according to a standard more generous than negligence, perhaps something closer to "avoidable harm." (4) Administrative Compensation System: This approach replaces the tort system with a "no-fault" administered system patterned after state-based workers compensation systems. There are no lawsuits or assignment of blame in this system. Independent medical review boards determine the validity of each case (that is, was the patient injured by avoidable harm), and compensation is awarded to patients by a separate review board according to a pre-determined schedule. Versions of this program have been implemented in a number of other countries. (5) None of these will reduce the amount of defensive medicine physicians practice. (6) 6. Your choices for the reforms that you think will be effective at reducing the amount of defensive medicine you practice appear below. Please rank them by dragging and dropping them into the correct order from most effective to least effective. Q6a) Please explain why you ranked your choice as most effective at reducing the amount of defensive medicine you practice. Q3) In which state (or District of Columbia) do you practice? Q4) The following medical malpractice reforms have been widely implemented at the state level. Which of the following have been implemented in your state? Please select all that are applicable. Caps on non-economic damages: Limit the amount of money that a plaintiff can take as an award for non-economic losses, or pain and suffering, in a malpractice suit. The cap may apply to the plaintiff, limiting the amount he or she may receive, or to each defendant, limiting the total amount for which each may be liable. (1) Pre-trial screening panels: Panel reviews a malpractice case at an early stage and provides an opinion about whether a claim has sufficient merit to proceed to trial. Typically, but not always, a negative

opinion does not bar a case from going forward, but can be introduced by the defendant as evidence at trial. (2) Certificate of merit: Requires a plaintiff to present, at the time of filing the claim or soon thereafter, an affidavit certifying that a qualified medical expert believes that there is a reasonable and meritorious basis for the suit. (3) Attorney fee limits: Limits the amount of a malpractice award that a plaintiff's attorney may take in a contingent-fee arrangement. The limitation is typically expressed as a percentage of the award; it may also incorporate a maximum dollar value. (4) Joint-and-several liability reform: In cases involving more than one defendant, such as a physician and a hospital, this reform limits the financial liability of each defendant to the percentage fault that the jury allocates to that defendant. Without this reform, the plaintiff may collect the entire amount of the judgment from one defendant if the other(s) default on their obligation to pay, even if the paying defendant bore only a small share of the responsibility for what happened to the plaintiff. (5) Aggressive statutes of limitations/repose: Limits the amount of time a patient has to file a malpractice claim. Statutes of limitations bar suits unless they are filed within a specified time after the injury occurs or is reasonably discovered. Statutes of repose bar suites unless they are filed within a specified time after the medical encounter occurred, regardless of whether an injury has yet been discovered. (6) None: No medical malpractice reforms have been implemented in my state, or those that had been implemented were later repealed. (7) Other. Please specify. (8) Not sure / don t know. (9)

If caps have been enacted: Q4a) You have indicated that caps on non-economic damages have been implemented in your state. How has the implementation of this reform affected the amount of defensive medicine you practice? It has not changed the amount of defensive medicine I practice. (3) It has significantly decreased the amount of defensive medicine I practice. (5) Q4ai) Why has the implementation of caps on damages not affected the amount of defensive Q4aii) Why has the implementation of caps on damages increased the amount of defensive Q4aiii) Why has the implementation of caps on damages decreased the amount of defensive If pre-trial screening panels have been enacted: 4b. You have indicated that pre-trial screening panels have been implemented in your state. How has the implementation of this reform affected the amount of defensive medicine you practice? It has not changed the amount of defensive medicine I practice. (3) It has significantly decreased the amount of defensive medicine I practice. (5) 4bi. Why has the implementation of pre-trial screening panels not changed the amount of defensive 4bii. Why has the implementation of pre-trial screening panels increased the amount of defensive 4biii. Why has the implementation of pre-trial screening panels decreased the amount of defensive

If certificates of merit have been enacted: 4c. You have indicated that certificates of merit have been implemented in your state. How has the implementation of this reform affected the amount of defensive It has not changed the amount of defensive medicine practice. (3) It has significantly decreased the amount of defensive I practice. (5) 4ci. Why has the implementation of certificates of merit not changed the amount of defensive 4cii. Why has the implementation of certificates of merit increased the amount of defensive 4ciii. Why has the implementation of certificates of merit decreased the amount of defensive If attorney fee limits have been enacted: 4d. You have indicated that attorney fee limits have been implemented in your state. How has the implementation of this reform affected your practice of defensive medicine? It has not changed the amount of defensive medicine I practice. (3) It has significantly decreased the amount of defensive medicine I practice. (5) 4di. Why has the implementation of attorney fee limits not changed the amount of defensive 4dii. Why has the implementation of attorney fee limits increased the amount of defensive 4diii. Why has the implementation of attorney fee limits decreased the amount of defensive

If joint-and-severability has been enacted: 4e) You have indicated that joint-and-severability reform has been implemented in your state. How has the implementation of this reform affected the amount of defensive medicine you practice? It has not changed the amount of defensive medicine I practice. (3) It has significantly decreased the amount of defensive medicine I practice. (5) 4ei. Why has the implementation of joint-and-severability reform not changed the amount of defensive 4eii. Why has the implementation of joint-and-severability reform increased the amount of defensive 4eiii. Why has the implementation of joint-and-severability reform decreased the amount of defensive If aggressive statutes of limitations/repose have been enacted: 4f. You have indicated that aggressive statutes of limitations/repose have been implemented in your state. How has the implementation of this reform affected the amount of defensive It has not changed the amount of defensive medicine I practice. (3) It has significantly decreased the amount of defensive medicine I practice. (5) 4fi. Why has the implementation of aggressive statutes of limitations/repose not affected the amount of defensive 4fii. Why has the implementation of aggressive statutes of limitation/repose increased the amount of defensive 4fiii. Why has the implementation of aggressive statutes of limitation/repose decreased the amount of defensive

Answer If Q3) In which state do you practice? Massachusetts Is Selected Your answer to Q2 indicates that you practice in the state of Massachusetts. Are you aware of the changes to the Massachusetts healthcare law pertaining to medical malpractice that was signed by Governor Deval Patrick on August 6, 2012? Yes, I am aware (1) No, I am not (2) Answer If Q3) In which state do you practice? Massachusetts Is Selected This new Massachusetts law is in the category of medical malpractice laws know as Disclosure, Apology and Offer. It permits health care providers and their medical malpractice insurance companies to investigate, disclose and explain to patients what happened when unanticipated adverse outcomes occur and, if appropriate, to apologize and offer compensation to patients without resorting to litigation and without concern that the apology or the offer of compensation will be admitted into evidence during trial if the claim does not settle. Patients retain the right to consult with their own attorneys regarding their legal rights, to help evaluate the fairness and adequacy of any offer of compensation, and to begin medical malpractice litigation if they choose to do so. Based on the description of the law, how do you anticipate its passage will affect the amount of defensive I will significantly increase the amount of defensive medicine I practice in light of this new law. (1) I will somewhat increase the amount of defense medicine I practice in light of this new law. (2) This law will not change my practice of defensive medicine. (3) I will somewhat decrease the amount of defensive medicine I practice in light of this new law. (4) I will significantly decrease the amount of defensive medicine I practice in light of this new law. (5) Why do you anticipate the passage of this law will not change the amount of defensive medicine you practice? Why do you anticipate that the passage of this law will increase the amount of defensive Why do you anticipate that the passage of this law will decrease the amount of defensive

Answer If Q2) In which state do you practice? Oregon Is Selected Your answer to Q2 indicates that you practice in the state of Oregon. Are you aware of the medical malpractice reform recommendation that Governor John Kitzhaber issued on July 25th of this year? Yes, I am aware (1) No, I am not (2) Answer If Q2) In which state do you practice? Oregon Is Selected Governor Kitzhaber's proposal falls into the category of medical malpractice laws known as Disclosure, Apology and Offer. The system would require the injured party and the doctor or health care provider to discuss the circumstances of the incident, and include an apology from the provider if appropriate. The provider must make an offer of compensation to the injured party within 90 days, or instead decide no offer is warranted. If the injured party is not satisfied, the matter goes to mediation. Only if that fails can a lawsuit be filed. Based on the description of this proposal, how do you anticipate the passage of this law would affect your practice of defensive medicine? I would significantly increase the amount of defensive medicine I practice if this law were passed. (1) I would somewhat increase the amount of defensive medicine I practice if this law were passed. (2) I would not change the amount of defensive medicine I practice if this law were passed. (3) I would somewhat decrease the amount of defensive medicine I practice if this law were passed. (4) I would significantly decrease the amount of defensive medicine I practice if this law were passed. (5) Why do you anticipate the passage of this law would not change the amount of defensive Why do you anticipate you would increase the amount of defensive medicine you practice if this law were passed? Why do you anticipate that the passage of this law will decrease the amount of defensive

Q7) As individual state legislatures contemplate medical malpractice tort reform, what should they keep in mind from a physician's perspective? So that we may categorize your responses, please answer the following questions: Q8) Which of the following best describes the ownership of the practice in which you work? Solo practice; I am the practice owner (1) Single specialty practice; I have an ownership stake (2) Multi- specialty practice; I have an ownership stake (3) Physician owned single specialty practice; I work for the practice, but do not have an ownership stake (4) Physician owned multi-specialty practice; I work for the practice, but do not have an ownership stake (5) Hospital or health system owned single specialty practice (6) Hospital or health system owned multi-specialty practice (7) I am a W-2 employee of a hospital or health system (8) I am an independent contractor or a locum tenens physician (9) I am retired (10) Q9) Which of the following best describes your specialty? If you specialize in more than one discipline, please select the one on which you spend the most of your practice time. Q10) Are you: Male (1) Female (2) Q11) Which of the following best describes your age? Younger than age 25 (1) Between 25 and 34 (2) Between 35 and 44 (3) Between 45 and 54 (4) Between 55 and 64 (5) Age 65 or older (6)