Culture Alignment Tool

Similar documents
The 360 Degree Feedback Advantage

Improve Sales Performance

For Optimal Sales Force Performance, Pay Is Not Enough

The Missing Link: Driving Business Results Through Pay-for-Performance. For Small & Midsized Businesses. Copyright 2007 SuccessFactors, Inc.

Powerful ways to have an impact on employee engagement

The Leadership Mystery Defining Leadership Success through Competency Modeling and Workforce Analytics

The greatness gap: The state of employee disengagement. Achievers 2015 North American workforce survey results

structures stack up Tom McMullen

Linking Employee Satisfaction, Employee Engagement, and Employee Ambassadorship Session 1: Ambassadorship Concept/Framework Introduction and Rationale

5/30/2012 PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT GOING AGILE. Nicolle Strauss Director, People Services

Research Grant Proposals-Sample Sections. Implications for HR Practice - examples from prior proposals:

TALENT OPTIMIZATION. Transforming HR and Human Capital Management for Business Growth

Optimizing Rewards and Employee Engagement

The Truths About Change

Perspectives. Employee voice. Releasing voice for sustainable business success

Turnover. Defining Turnover

Benefits make up an important component of the employment. Employee Benefits in a Total Rewards Framework. article Business Case for Benefits

Fewer. Bigger. Stronger.

Self Assessment Tool for Principals and Vice-Principals

LEADERSHIP CULTURE SURVEY

Successful Change Management Practices in the Public Sector. How governmental agencies implement organizational change management

Results & Key Findings

People intelligence from New Tech companies 2013 NEW TECH BENCHMARK REPORT

Strategic HR Partner Assessment (SHRPA) Feedback Results

Building HR Capabilities. Through the Employee Survey Process

Employee Engagement FY Introduction. 2. Employee Engagement. 3. Management Approach

Employee Engagement Survey Nova Scotia Government-wide Report

7 DRIVERS FOR BUILDING EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT: FROM HIRE TO RETIRE

PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT ROADMAP

Making Strategic Planning Work

The Power of Three. Taking Engagement to New Heights

Armchair Quarterbacking in Sales Organizations

1. LEADERSHIP 90 INFORMATION & ANALYSIS STRATEGIC QUALITY PLANNING 4. HUMAN RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT & MANAGEMENT 150

Behaviors and Actions That Support Leadership and Team Effectiveness, by Organizational Level

Organizational Effectiveness. Discovering How to Make It Happen

Consulting Performance, Rewards & Talent. Measuring the Business Impact of Employee Selection Systems

Institutional Vision, Proposed Mandate Statement and Priority Objectives

Engagement and Culture: Engaging Talent in Turbulent Times

ISO 9001:2015 Your implementation guide

LEADERSHIP STYLES. This chapter describes the difference between traditional leadership and collaborative leadership. A Traditional Leader

Strategic human resource management toolkit

How the Fundamentals Have Evolved and the Best Adapt

When you hear the word engagement, you

Aon Case Study: Creating a Global Leadership Culture

Human Capital Advantage for Business What is the Value of ADP ihcm for CEOs?

Are you in the wrong target-date fund? Now is a good time to reevaluate

LEADERSHIP DEVELOPMENT

PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL 360 Review Form

Global Talent Management and Rewards Study

Consulting Performance, Rewards & Talent. Making Employee Engagement Happen: Best Practices from Best Employers

DIPLOMA OF MANAGEMENT BSB51107 or DIPLOMA OF HUMAN RESOURCES MANAGEMENT-BSB Study Support materials for

Need Information? Go to: Have Questions?

Eight Recommendations to Improve Employee Engagement

Building and Sustaining a Strong Organization Amid Challenge And Change KPMG LLP

From Capability To Profitability Talent management a priority for the C-Suite. London, 3 rd November 2015

The Success Profile for Shared Services and Centres of Expertise

The research is undeniable: Gallup estimates disengaged employees cost the U.S. economy as much as $350 billion a year; the United Kingdom,

Coaching the team at Work

STAFF. Summary of Results _University of Minnesota Crookston_STAFF. HumanResources. Office of

Bayer Employee Survey 2014 Boosting innovation culture as an outcome of the Employee Survey

Business Architecture: a Key to Leading the Development of Business Capabilities

Talent Management Leadership in Professional Services Firms

6 Essential Characteristics of a PLC (adapted from Learning by Doing)

FOCUS MONASH. Strategic Plan

Global Pension Finance Watch Year-End Mixed Financial Results for Pension Plans in 2015

Employee Engagement Drives Client Satisfaction and Employee Success in Professional Services

Change Management. Tools and Techniques for Change Management Success

Leading Self. Leading Others. Leading Performance and Change. Leading the Coast Guard

Culture of Purpose Building business confidence; driving growth 2014 core beliefs & culture survey

RESEARCH REPORT SHRM / GLOBOFORCE. Employee Recognition Survey WINTER 2012 REPORT THE IMPACT OF RECOGNITION ON EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT AND ROI

6. Chief human resources officer

Global Pension Finance Watch First Quarter Challenging start to 2016 for global pension plans

SHARED SERVICES OR OUTSOURCING?

A guide to achieving growth and sustainability in your practice

The Global State of Employee Engagement: A 2014 Study

Temkin Group Insight Report

Egon Zehnder International. The Leading Edge of Diversity and Inclusion. 11th International Executive Panel October 2012

BETTER RELATIONSHIP SELLING

Benchmark Report. Marketing: Sponsored By: 2014 Demand Metric Research Corporation in Partnership with Ascend2. All Rights Reserved.

2016 Edenred-Ipsos Barometer Understand and improve Wellbeing At Work. May 2016

360 feedback. Manager. Development Report. Sample Example. name: date:

Sales Compensation Programs and Practices. research. A report by WorldatWork October 2010

WINNING THE TALENT WAR ON THE HOME FRONT A GUIDE TO RETAINING TALENT USING REWARDS AND RECOGNITION

Creating Line of Sight

Creating Line of Sight

Developing Great Frontline Sales Managers: Four Key Sales Management Abilities

Employee Engagement Survey Results. Sample Company. All Respondents

Employee Engagement in the Continuing and Long Term Care Sectors

Investment manager research

The CFO leads cultural transformation and acts as a guiding light for the whole organization.

The Basics of a Compensation Program

2015 Trends & Insights

Report on the Agency-Advertiser Value Survey

Goal(s): This session is designed to provide attendees with an update on recent or upcoming DDS events.

GM Is Still Writing Its Social CRM

Business Agility SURVIVAL GUIDE

An Introduction to Organizational Maturity Assessment: Measuring Organizational Capabilities

Organization transformation in times of change

BUSINESS CONSULTING SERVICES Comprehensive practice management solutions for independent investment advisors

SEYMOUR SLOAN IDEAS THAT MATTER MOVING BEYOND CUSTOMER EXPERIENCE TOWARDS CUSTOMER ENGAGEMENT - A WINNING APPROACH

Transcription:

Culture Alignment Tool Aligning your corporate culture with business goals Leaders of high-performance companies underst that a corporate culture that is aligned with its strategic priorities helps the organization achieve business success. The challenge: achieving alignment sustaining it over the long term. High performance: as unique as a company itself One of the most striking characteristics of high-performance organizations is the level of harmony between business strategy organization culture that they manage to achieve sustain over time. A manufacturer competing chiefly on cost efficiency, for instance, requires a culture very different from that of a luxury goods retailer for which personalized attention is the ultimate differentiator. High performance means different things in companies competing on different strategic priorities across industry sectors. In short, the right high-performance is one that helps a company achieve a specific set of business requirements. In a high-performance organization, workplace practices must actively influence the employee behaviors needed to execute its strategy reinforce its market focus. What defines company Cultural alignment: making it real So how do high-performance companies align their cultures with strategic priorities? It starts with leadership. Our work with high-performing organizations has proved that the attitudes behaviors of leaders are critical in establishing a culture that aligns with the business strategy. But, certainly, this is easier said than done. In fact, many companies cultures are not aligned with their business, because their leaders, who by large focus on the financial operational aspects of the business, simply allow corporate culture to evolve. In some cases, the responsibilities of day-to-day management intrude, or leaders do not have the tools necessary to identify close the gaps between culture strategy. Culture generally refers to the shared set of values, principles, assumptions, beliefs, symbols behaviors that reflects how work gets designed executed. In short, it s how things are done around here. Of course, no two organizations cultures are exactly alike. When the culture strategy align, both people functions work toward a common purpose. For example, a company that relies on service to drive growth must have leaders who truly value good relations, an HR organization that offers outsting training on how to best deal with s, a sales function that asks for follows up on opinions, employees who underst that their primary focus is on understing how to satisfy s consistently achieving that goal. Culture, all the systems that support it, must reinforce reward these actions, behaviors attitudes. Willis Towers Watson Culture Alignment Tool Willis Towers Watson s Culture Alignment Tool (CAT) is an innovative web-based technique for helping leaders underst their organization s current culture map a future culture that aligns with their strategic priorities. Based on our extensive research with high-performing organizations in particular, the cultural elements that those organizations employ to achieve strong financial results given a specific strategy the CAT provides a proven framework for closing the gap between current desired cultures.

Cultural profiles by strategic priority Strategic priorities Efficiency Quality Innovation Customer service Company image Cultural differentiators* by strategy in financially high-performing companies Comprehensive training in basic Precisely defined job roles allocation of resources workload Clear effective organizational assessment of Coordination of efforts across work groups Empowerment of people to correct/improve work use of data-based feedback on product/service performance focus on long-term advanced training for superior to ensure superior diversity of thought opinion for risk taking Anticipating s emerging needs expectations Consistently recognizing new ideas their Leadership clarity on future priorities Information sharing to improve service Positive team working Strong Regularly adopting perspective talent retention Embedded understing acceptance of br promise product or Deep pride in shared company values Integrity guiding all business practices Work external br Leadership that inspires confidence respect * Differentiators derived from Willis Towers Watson employee research into the survey questions topics on which financially successful/high-performing companies competing under each of these strategies excel versus their peers. Using the CAT, Willis Towers Watson can help your organization answer these questions: Do leaders have a common understing of the existing culture the future culture they want to achieve? How well do current future cultures support achievement of the organization s strategic goals? Do leaders agree among themselves on the organization s actual (or prospective) sources of competitive advantage? What changes are required to reshape the culture for enhanced performance in the future? Are executives, managers the HR function equipped to develop execute new strategies new aspects of culture to support the change process? How does the CAT work? Senior leaders begin the process by going to the CAT website, where they find 30 cultural attributes for example, strong, bias for action or support for risk taking that they rank order, dragging dropping each attribute (the cards ) Figure 1. Sorting method used for current future culture for risk taking into rows on a grid. (Figure 1 shows an example from an online assessment.) Executives rank order the 30 cultural attributes twice once in relation to how well each attribute describes the current culture a second time to indicate the extent to which each 2 Culture Alignment Tool

attribute describes the desired future culture. See Figure 2 for examples of completed assessments for both current future cultures. The results are then compared at the aggregate individual levels to data from organizations that are successful at achieving specific strategic priorities. This enables us to show how a given organization s culture compares with the cultures of high-performing organizations. (See Figure 3 for an example.) In this case, results show that, relative to the current culture, the leaders desire a future culture more like companies succeeding on innovation less like companies succeeding on efficiency, they perceive the current culture as just the opposite. What are your strategic priorities? To align culture with strategic priorities, an organization s senior leadership must first agree on what those priorities are. Willis Towers Watson has conducted extensive research on the cultural attributes of high-performance companies categorized them based on their dominant business strategy. Our research shows that high-performance companies tend to focus on one or two primary strategic priorities, they align their culture to support them. In a broad sense, those priorities are: A relentless focus on the A pronounced emphasis on organizational efficiency A compelling image or br A superior level of product quality A consistently exceptional level of innovation Figure 2. Example of current future culture results: ordered left to right, top to bottom by average row placement score Leadership that inspires confidence respect Embedded understing acceptance of br promise Regularly adopting perspective Comprehensive training in basic Leadership clarity on future priorities for risk taking Leadership that inspires confidence respect Consistently recognizing new ideas their Regularly adopting perspective talent retention Leadership clarity on future priorities Comprehensive training in basic Integrity guiding all business practices Strong Anticipating s emerging needs expectations Integrity guiding all business practices Anticipating s emerging needs expectations Strong Embedded understing acceptance of br promise allocation of resources workload Information sharing to improve service Deep pride in shared company values to ensure superior Precisely defined job roles diversity of thought opinion diversity of thought opinion Information sharing to improve service Deep pride in shared company values to ensure superior Precisely defined job roles use of data-based feedback on product/ service performance Positive team working talent retention use of data-based feedback on product/ service performance advanced training for superior Coordination of efforts across work groups Consistently recognizing new ideas their for risk taking advanced training for superior Coordination of efforts across work groups Figure 3. Current future correlations with strategic priorities Work external br allocation of resources workload focus on long-term Clear effective organizational Work external br Positive team working focus on long-term Clear effective organizational Empowerment of people to correct/improve Empowerment of people to correct/improve Current culture emphasizes service image/br. Future culture emphasizes innovation, with a maintained focus on service image/br, less emphasis on efficiency. 0.5 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.3.23.17 0.5 Customer service.05.06 Quality.09.24 Efficiency.13.25 Innovation.43.42 Image/Br Current Future 3 Culture Alignment Tool

The CAT also identifies levels of consensus among senior leaders on current future cultures. The grid shown in Figure 4 indicates the degree to which the organization s leaders agree or disagree about future cultural attributes. Blue boxes represent attributes to which members of the leadership group have assigned similar emphases. Gold boxes indicate moderate agreement on emphasis, green boxes show where leaders disagree. The grid facilitates a valuable discussion among leaders about where the company does does not need to focus. Figure 4. Example of results for consensus on future culture Strong toward serving s Awareness of needs expectations Rewarding new ideas their Work s that stimulate new ideas Clear accountabilities organizational Ongoing development of people Clear core values risk taking Confidence in respect for leadership Shared values pride in the company Stard performance management system Collaborative work Understing s quality expectations Performance mgmt. aligned with service goals Training on basic work focus on long-term Comfortable supportive work Positive supervisor/ employee working Retaining the most talented people Continual training to ensure low error/defect rates sharing management of information to ensure quality outputs diversity of thought opinion Understing company direction br promise Empowering people to correct work High consensus Medium consensus Low consensus Aligning work culture with changing organizational goals A biopharmaceutical company had high levels of start-up capital a high burn rate, but no product yet on the market. In response, the company cut the workforce by 20% brought in a new leadership team. To put the company on a track to success, the new leaders wanted to underst how the existing corporate culture needed to change to align with emerging strategic priorities. By using the CAT, top leadership discovered areas where the culture supported business priorities areas where it needed to change. To improve performance, top management desired a future focus on two priorities primarily innovation in order to develop products to take to market, secondarily operating efficiency to foster the business discipline to run the organization profitably. To build alignment, Willis Towers Watson helped the company launch an ongoing series of meetings of the senior management team (roughly the top 8%) open dialogues among the CEO, executive team other senior department leaders. The CEO used these meetings to discuss refine the company s key business strategies for the coming year. These business imperatives were then communicated throughout the organization. In addition, to reduce communication complexity, leaders eliminated unnecessary committee meetings introduced a single operations committee for senior-level decision making. They also agreed that executives would communicate the rationale next steps for strategic decisions directly to employees. A subsequent all-employee opinion survey was designed directly from CAT results, with a focus on attributes needed to drive innovation operating efficiency. Analysis of the survey results showed that the company performed well against benchmark organizations, employees were generally engaged. However, the results also showed that employees wanted more from leadership: more communication, clearer direction strategy, better connection with the future of the company. Top management also discovered some surprising differences between the executive level the rest of the company. Executives were actually more negative than other employee groups on all aspects of managing the company, including direction strategy, communication, decision making competitiveness as a business. After the assessments subsequent discussions, company leaders were able to better underst different viewpoints among themselves implement change management strategies to bring the culture into closer alignment with strategic priorities. The result: A year later, another allemployee survey was conducted, all categories of employee opinion in that survey showed improvement. 4 Culture Alignment Tool

The Willis Towers Watson approach: from insights to impact In an ideal world, an organization s culture would always be neatly aligned with its strategic. But in reality, top leadership doesn t always achieve clear or consistent agreement on strategic priorities or the cultural traits needed to support them. That s where Willis Towers Watson consultants the CAT come in. Contact us For more information on the CAT visit us at www.towerswatson.com/services/ Employee-Surveys. Does your corporate culture help you reach your business goals or does it st in the way? We help you underst the results of the tool s findings, the broader workforce implications where interventions might be needed. We engage your leaders in a cid discussion about strategic priorities how the culture might need to change identify areas in which it should stay the same we can work with you to implement recommended solutions. About Willis Towers Watson Willis Towers Watson (NASDAQ: WLTW) is a leading global advisory, broking solutions company that helps clients around the world turn risk into a path for growth. With roots dating to 1828, Willis Towers Watson has 39,000 employees in more than 120 countries. We design deliver solutions that manage risk, optimize benefits, cultivate talent, exp the power of capital to protect strengthen institutions individuals. Our unique perspective allows us to see the critical intersections between talent, assets ideas the dynamic formula that drives business performance. Together, we unlock potential. Learn more at willistowerswatson.com. Copyright 2016 Willis Towers Watson. All rights reserved. WTW-GL-16-SAL-3109 willistowerswatson.com