UNITED STATES OF AMERICA PLEA AGREEMENT. - against - 03 CR 1322 (S-1) (DLI) Pursuant to Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Criminal

Similar documents
U.S. Department of Justice. United States Attorney Southern District of New York. May 11, 2010

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE DIVISION. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) ) ) v. ) No. ) (Judge ) ) )

Case 3:09-cr JAP Document 84 Filed 11/30/11 Page 1 of 7 PageID: 376

DISCOVERY IN FEDERAL CRIMINAL CASES

Case 4:12-cr WTM-GRS Document 153 Filed 06/17/13 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA SAVANNAH DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION. v. CRIMINAL NO. H-04- PLEA AGREEMENT

United States District Court Southern District of Florida MIAMI DIVISION

GUILTY PLEA and PLEA AGREEMENT United States Attorney Northern District of Georgia

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION PLEA AGREEMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Criminal No (JMR) The United States of America, by and through its attorneys,

A Federal Criminal Case Timeline

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION. v. CASE NO. 8:15-CR-244-T-23AEP PLEA AGREEMENT

Case 1:05-cr RWS-LTW Document Filed 09/27/2007 Page 1 of 7

United States Attorney District of Connecticut

Chapter 153. Violations and Fines 2013 EDITION. Related Laws Page 571 (2013 Edition)

RULES OF SUPREME COURT OF VIRGINIA PART THREE A CRIMINAL PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE APPENDIX

Information to Potential Participant

FALSE CLAIMS ACT STATUTORY LANGUAGE

OLMSTED COUNTY ATTORNEY DOMESTIC ABUSE PROSECUTION POLICY POLICY STATEMENT:

KANE COUNTY DRUG REHABILITATION COURT COURT RULES AND PROCEDURES

STATE OF NEW YORK : : ALLEGANY COUNTY DRUG COUNTY OF ALLEGANY : : TREATMENT COURT. Defendant.

Subchapter Criminal Procedure in District Court

DESCRIPTION OF THE FEDERAL CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM FOR DEFENDANTS

SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN

CAUSE NO. THE STATE OF TEXAS IN THE 49th DISTRICT COURT ZAPATA COUNTY, TEXAS

IN THE IOWA DISTRICT COURT FOR WOODBURY COUNTY. WRITTEN PLEA OF GUILTY AND WAIVER OF RIGHTS (OWI First Offense)

Using Administrative Records to Report Federal Criminal Case Processing Statistics

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ~ FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CARQL~fiDIfI/OPt: NO.5: 09-CR-216-1FL ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Criminal No.: (JNE) 1 PLEA AGREEMENT AND

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS INSTRUCTIONS FOR FILING COMPLAINT BY PRISONERS UNDER THE CIVIL RIGHTS ACT, 42 U.S.C.

GUILTY PLEA and PLEA AGREEMENT

ARTICLE 36: KANE COUNTY DRUG REHABILITATION COURT RULES AND PROCEDURES

Title 15 CRIMINAL PROCEDURE -Chapter 23 ALABAMA CRIME VICTIMS Article 3 Crime Victims' Rights

Criminal Justice System Commonly Used Terms & Definitions

Senate Bill No. 86 Committee on Transportation and Homeland Security

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY LONDON CRIMINAL NO JBC UNITED STATES OF AMERICA * * * * *

AN ACT. The goals of the alcohol and drug treatment divisions created under this Chapter include the following:

LR Case management pilot program for criminal cases. A. Scope; application. This is a special pilot rule governing time limits for criminal

Title 17-A: MAINE CRIMINAL CODE

UNDERSTANDING THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM Anne Benson

THE FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF RICHMOND RICHMOND - BALTIMORE-CHARLOTTE Post Office Box Richmond,VA Phone

FEDERAL RESERVE BANK of ATLANTA

Filing Fee $ Instructions for Sealing a Criminal Record

An Introduction to the Federal Public Defender=s Office and the Federal Court System

PLEA AGREEMENT. My full true name is Amy 1. Curl, and I request that all proceedings against me be had in

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION. v. CASE NO. 8:07-Cr- 31B"^1 PLEA AGREEMENT

General District Courts

[New] Standard 1. Compensation. Standard 2. Duties and Responsibilities of Counsel. Standard 3. Caseload Limits and Types of Cases

Glossary of Terms Acquittal Affidavit Allegation Appeal Arraignment Arrest Warrant Assistant District Attorney General Attachment Bail Bailiff Bench

KENTUCKY VICTIMS RIGHTS LAWS1

GETTING TO KNOW THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM

Maricopa County Attorney s Office Adult Criminal Case Process

FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY

The False Claims Act: A Primer

COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, BELMONT COUNTY, OHIO. State of Ohio, ) ) Plaintiff ) ) CASE NO.: vs. ) ) DRUG COURT PLEA, ) ) Defendant )

FEDERAL RESERVE BANK of CLEVELAND

SUBJECT: Department Policy Concerning Charging Criminal Offenses, Disposition of Charges, and Sentencing

Mahoning County Criminal Local Rules of Court. Table of Contents. 2 Grand Jury 2. 3 Dismissals Appointment of Counsel... 4

9 FAM 40.21(a) CRIMES INVOLVING MORAL TURPITUDE

CHAPTER 6: CRIMINAL PROCEDURE MICHIGAN COURT RULES OF 1985

Adult Plea Negotiation Guidelines

Case 1:03-cr LEK Document 24 Filed 05/02/06 Page 1 of 7. Petitioner, Respondent. MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER 1

Case 1:05-cr GAO Document 459 Filed 09/24/14 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS CRIMINAL NO.

FOR STATE CONVICTIONS IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA IN AND FOR PIMA COUNTY

SENATE BILL 1486 AN ACT

Montana Legislative Services Division Legal Services Office. Memorandum

Number of Units: Contractor will commence representation in units of indigent defense services.

CrR 3.1 STANDARDS FOR INDIGENT DEFENSE. [New] Standard 1. Compensation. [Reserved.] Standard 2. Duties and Responsibilities of Counsel

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA

Restoration of Civil Rights. Helping People regain their Civil Liberties

SHORT TITLE: Criminal procedure; creating the Oklahoma Drug Court Act; codification; emergency.

Case 1:06-cr AWI Document 91 Filed 04/29/08 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

A petty offense is either a violation or a traffic infraction. Such offenses are not crimes.

2 Be it enacted by the People of the State of Illinois, 4 Section 1. Short title. This Act may be cited as the

BASIC CRIMINAL LAW. Joe Bodiford. Overview of a criminal case Presented by: Board Certified Criminal Trial Lawyer

Case 2:05-cr Document 10 Filed 03/16/06 Page 1 of 13 PageID #: 18. U.S. Department of. United States Attorney. 300 Virginia Street Suite 4000

FILED December 8, 2015 Carla Bender 4 th District Appellate Court, IL

PART 37 TRIAL AND SENTENCE IN A MAGISTRATES COURT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT PORTLAND DIVISION

FEDERAL RESERVE BANK of ATLANTA

First Regular Session Sixty-ninth General Assembly STATE OF COLORADO INTRODUCED HOUSE SPONSORSHIP

California Judges Association OPINION NO. 56. (Issued: August 29, 2006)

CAYMAN ISLANDS. Supplement No. 9 published with Extraordinary Gazette No. 53 of 17th July, DRUG REHABILITATION COURT LAW.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT. No Non-Argument Calendar. D.C. Docket No. 3:11-cr RBD-JBT-1.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Criminal No.:

No. 108,809 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, SHANE RAIKES, Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT

RULES FOR LOUISIANA DISTRICT COURTS. TITLES I, II, and III Fourteenth Judicial District Court Parish of Calcasieu

Purpose of the Victim/Witness Unit

AMENDED ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER GOVERNING A COLLECTIONS COURT PROGRAM IN ORANGE COUNTY

MANDATORY MINIMUM REPORT FIELD INTERVIEW PROTOCOL FOR U.S. ATTORNEY REPRESENTATIVE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN NORTHERN DIVISION. Judge Thomas L.. Ludington. v. Offense: 15 U.S.C, 2614(1)(C) and 2615(b)

Case 2:03-cr JES Document 60 Filed 02/19/08 Page 1 of 7 PageID 178 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION

CHAPTER 93. BE IT ENACTED by the Senate and General Assembly of the State of New Jersey: 1. N.J.S.2C:35-14 is amended to read as follows:

PRODOC FEDERAL CRIMINAL DEFENSE

CHAPTER 15. AN ACT concerning rehabilitation of drug and alcohol dependent offenders and amending N.J.S.2C:35-14 and N.J.S.2C:35-15.

Your Criminal Justice System

SMALL CLAIMS RULES. (d) Record of Proceedings. A record shall be made of all small claims court proceedings.

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA DOMESTIC RELATIONS PROCEDURAL RULES COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION 140

Transcription:

KTC/MLM:JHK/PKC F.#2002R02098 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -X UNITED STATES OF AMERICA PLEA AGREEMENT - against - 03 CR 1322 (S-1) (DLI) MOHAMMED MOHSEN YAHYA ZAYED, Defendant. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -X Pursuant to Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, the United States Attorney's Office for the Eastern District of New York (the "Office") and MOHAMMED MOHSEN YAHYA ZAYED (the "defendant") agree to the following: 1. The defendant will plead guilty to Count Three of the above-captioned superseding indictment charging a violation of 18 U.S.C. 2339B(a)(1). The count carries the following statutory penalties: a. Maximum term of imprisonment: 15 years (18 U.S.C. 2339B(a)(1)). b. Minimum term of imprisonment: 0 years (18 U.S.C. 2339B(a)(1)). c. Maximum supervised release term: 3 years, to follow any term of imprisonment; if a condition of release is violated, the defendant may be sentenced to up to 2 years without credit for pre-release imprisonment or time previously served on post-release supervision (18 U.S.C. 3583 (b), (e)).

2 d. Maximum fine: $250,000 (18 U.S.C. 3571(b)(3)). e. Restitution: To be determined. (18 U.S.C. 3663 and 3663A). f. $100 special assessment (18 U.S.C. 3013). g. Other penalties: deportation/removal. The defendant stipulates to the entry of a judicial order of removal, pursuant to Section 238(c) of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952, as amended, 8 U.S.C. 1228(c)(5) (the INA ), and waives the right to notice and a hearing under the INA with regard to his removal from the United States. The defendant specifically agrees to execute a Plea Statement in Support of Judicial Removal Proceedings. 2. Pursuant to Rule 11(c)(1)(C) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, the Office and the defendant agree that a specific sentence of 80 months imprisonment, 1 no supervised release and a $100 special assessment (as well as any fine and/or restitution imposed consistent with paragraph 1 above) is the appropriate disposition in this case. The defendant consents to expedited sentencing by the Court and waives the right to have a Presentence Report prepared in connection with sentencing. In the 1 The Bureau of Prisons Designations and Sentence Computations Center has already concluded that the defendant will get sentence credit for his time served in German custody from January 2003 until his extradition to the United States in November 2003.

3 event the agreed-upon sentence is above or below the adjusted offense level under the United States Sentencing Guidelines calculated by the Court, the defendant and the Office consent to an adjustment under 18 U.S.C. 3553(a), and the Office will inform the Court at the time of sentencing why the adjustment is justified. The defendant will not challenge any Guidelines calculation by the Court or Probation Department. If the Court rejects this plea agreement, the defendant, pursuant to Rule 11(c)(5), and the Office shall be afforded the opportunity to withdraw or vacate the plea. The Office will advise the Court and the Probation Department of information relevant to sentencing, including criminal activity engaged in by the defendant, and such information may be used by the Court in determining the defendant s sentence. 3. The defendant agrees not to file an appeal or otherwise challenge, by petition pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2255 or any other provision, the conviction or sentence in the event that the Court imposes a term of imprisonment of 80 months. This waiver is binding without regard to the sentencing analysis used by the Court. The defendant waives all defenses based on the statute of limitations and venue with respect to any prosecution that is not time-barred on the date that this agreement is signed in the event that (a) the defendant's conviction is later vacated for any reason, (b) the defendant violates this agreement, or (c) the

4 defendant s plea is later withdrawn. The defendant waives any right to additional disclosure from the government in connection with the guilty plea. The defendant agrees that with respect to all charges referred to in paragraphs 1 and 4 he is not a "prevailing party" within the meaning of the "Hyde Amendment," 18 U.S.C. 3006A note, and will not file any claim under that law. The defendant has paid the special assessment of $100 to the Clerk of the Court. 4. The defendant stipulates to the following facts and agrees that he will allocute, in substance, at the plea proceeding in this matter that: On or about and between January 7, 2003 and January 10, 2003, the defendant Mohammed Zayed agreed with the defendant Mohammed Al- Moayad to deliver money to Hamas that he expected to be provided by an individual whom he believed was a donor from Brooklyn, New York who wanted to fund violent operations by Hamas. Zayed knew that Hamas engaged in terrorist activity as defined under U.S. law, including that Hamas committed politically motivated acts of violence targeting civilian populations. Zayed also knew that Al-Moayad was associated and worked with Hamas leaders in Yemen and Hamas-related organizations to provide financial support to Hamas. Al-Moayad and Zayed intended to use those relationships to ensure that the money provided by the New York donor would in fact get to Hamas. Zayed traveled from Yemen to Germany in furtherance of the conspiracy, and knew that the money was to travel from Brooklyn, New York to places outside the United States.

5 5. The Office agrees that no further criminal charges will be brought against the defendant for the conspiracy to provide and the attempted provision of material support to designated foreign terrorist organizations between October 8, 1997 and January 10, 2003, as charged in the superseding indictment, it being understood that this agreement does not bar the use of such conduct as a predicate act or as the basis for a sentencing enhancement in a subsequent prosecution including, but not limited to, a prosecution pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1961 et seq., and at the time of sentence, it will move to dismiss the remaining counts of the superseding indictment and the underlying indictment with prejudice. 6. This agreement does not bind any federal, state, or local prosecuting authority other than the Office, and does not prohibit the Office from initiating or prosecuting any civil or administrative proceedings directly or indirectly involving the defendant. 7. This agreement is conditioned upon the following: (a) the defendants listed below (the covered defendants ) entering guilty pleas, pursuant to plea offers dated August 5, 2009 on or before August 24, 2009; and (b) acceptance of those pleas by a United States District Court Judge. The covered defendants are:

6 (i) Mohammed Ali Hassan Al-Moayad; and (ii) Mohammed Mohsen Yahya Zayed. If either of the covered defendants fails to satisfy conditions 7(a) and 7(b), or if either of the covered defendants subsequently seeks to withdraw his guilty plea, the Office, in its sole discretion, may elect to void any or all of the covered defendants plea agreements and proceed to trial. No covered defendant will have the right to withdraw his guilty plea in any of those circumstances. 8. No promises, agreements or conditions have been entered into by the parties other than those set forth in this agreement and none will be entered into unless memorialized in writing and signed by all parties. This agreement supersedes all prior promises, agreements or conditions between the parties. To

7 become effective, this agreement must be signed by all signatories listed below. BENTON J. CAMPBELL United States Attorney Eastern District of New York By: Pamela K. Chen Jeffrey H. Knox Assistant United States Attorneys Approved by: Marshall L. Miller Supervising Assistant U.S. Attorney I have read the entire agreement and discussed it with my attorney. I understand all of its terms and am entering into it knowingly and voluntarily. I also stipulate and acknowledge that the facts contained in paragraph 4 of the agreement are true and accurate and I will allocute to such facts at the plea proceeding. Defendant Mohammed Mohsen Yahya Zayed Approved by: Counsel to Defendant