Government Abuse of Power

Similar documents
Vocabulary Builder Activity. netw rks. A. Content Vocabulary. The Bill of Rights

SUMMARY OF KEY SECTIONS OF THE USA PATRIOT ACT OF 2001 By Richard Horowitz, Esq.

Principles of Oversight and Accountability For Security Services in a Constitutional Democracy. Introductory Note

CHAPTER 13: International Law, Norms, and Human Rights

2012 Party Platforms On Criminal Justice Policy

Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs - The Secretariat - Background Note on

Erbil Declaration. Regional Women s Security Forum on Resolution UNSCR 1325

Criminal Justice Sector and Rule of Law Working Group

Teacher lecture (background material and lecture outline provided) and class participation activity.

We have concluded that the International Criminal Court does not advance these principles. Here is why:

SUMMER 2014 LEGAL INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY NOTICE TO LAW STUDENTS American Civil Liberties Union Foundation Reproductive Freedom Project, NY

CONSTITUTIONFACTS.COM

1965 Alabama Literacy Test

4.7: Checks on Presidential Power AP U. S. Government

CATO HANDBOOK CONGRESS FOR POLICY RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE 108TH CONGRESS. Washington, D.C.

Prioritization/ political will

FEDERALISM THE SYSTEM OF GOVERNMENT IN THE UNITED STATES

Suggested List of Issues to Country Report Task Force on the United States. December 17, Center for Constitutional Rights

working group on foreign policy and grand strategy

FEDE DOMESTIC VIOLENCE STATUTES AND ELEMENTS FOR FEDERAL PROSECUTION

ADVANCE UNEDITED VERSION

CASE 0:12-cv RHK-SER Document 1 Filed 11/02/12 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

One Hundred Twelfth Congress of the United States of America

Republican and Democratic Party 2012 Immigration Platform Comparison

Five Myths Regarding Privacy and Law Enforcement Access to Personal Information in the European Union and the United States

International Criminal Law Services. and

CRIMINAL LAW & YOUR RIGHTS MARCH 2008

Draft Resolution for the United Nations Human Rights Council 30 th Session, September 14-25, Situation of Human Rights in Venezuela

APPLICATION QUESTIONNAIRE FOR THE VAWA PILOT PROJECT ON TRIBAL CRIMINAL JURISDICTION

The Law Commission BAIL AND THE HUMAN RIGHTS ACT 1998 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. (LAW COM No 269)

Bill C-51, Anti-terrorism Act, 2015 Executive Summary

CITIZEN ADVOCACY CENTER

RE: No US certification of Egypt government on human rights

COUNCIL OF EUROPE COMMITTEE OF MINISTERS

Honduras - Trade and Investment at the Expense of Human Rights

Domestic Violence. La violencia doméstica KNOW YOUR RIGHTS

Know your rights. Q: What If police, FBI, or immigration agents contact me? Do I have to answer questions?

4. There are three qualifications from becoming a member of the House of Representatives

Legislating for Violence against Children. With a focus on the juvenile justice system

Self-Help Guide for a Prosecutorial Discretion Request

Asset and Income Disclosure for Judges: A Summary Overview and Checklist By Keith E. Henderson*

Removal of Youth in the Adult Criminal Justice System: A State Trends Update. Rebecca Gasca on behalf of Campaign for Youth Justice

Fact sheet 2 Overview of the Extradition Process

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

Crete-Monee Middle School U.S. Constitution Test Study Guide Answers

Title 5: ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES AND SERVICES

DRIVER LICENCE DISQUALIFICATION REFORM

Issued 22 April Schedule to the Allocation and Gatekeeping Guidance Private Law

HOW DOES A CRIMINAL CASE GET DISMISSED WITHOUT A TRIAL? Many criminal cases are resolved without a trial. Some with straight forward dismissals.

ADVANCE UNEDITED VERSION

ADDRESSING POLICE MISCONDUCT

Breaking the silence united against domestic violence

U.S. Voting Rights Timeline

Questionnaire for compiling the 2011 Press Freedom Index The period runs from 1 December 2010 to 30 November 2011

APPENDIX: OVERVIEW OF PUBLIC INTEREST WORK

A public protection order is a court order that will allow the detention of very high risk individuals at a secure facility within prison precincts.

SUMMARY OF CIVIL RIGHTS LAWS, ACTS, AND AMENDMENTS

Sexual Violence as Weapon of War. By Lydia Farah Lawyer & Legal researcher

PREAMBLE. THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and THE GOVERNMENT OF CANADA (hereinafter "the Parties");

EL SALVADOR Open Letter on the Anti-Maras Act

From: Head of Prison Administration Department, Legislation and International Relations Research Office, Ministry of Justice

Naime Ahmeti A DEFENDANT RIGHTS OF THE DEFENDANT IN CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS

Speaker Sheldon Silver. Breaking New York s Addiction to Prison: Reforming New York s Rockefeller Drug Laws

New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990

How to Apply for a Pardon. State of California. Office of the Governor

KENTUCKY VICTIMS RIGHTS LAWS1

Council of Europe: European Court of Human Rights and the Parot Doctrine

CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION IN THE SLOVAK REPUBLIC

N.5 Immigration Holds and Immigration Detention; When to Obtain Release from Criminal Incarceration, and When Not To

GLOSSARY OF SELECTED LEGAL TERMS

REPORT ON THE EXCHANGE AND SUMMARY

A Critique of President Obama s Reforms of U.S. Intelligence

TITLE 42 - Section Findings and declarations

Montana Legislative Services Division Legal Services Office. Memorandum

Myths and Facts about the Cyber Intelligence Sharing and Protection Act (CISPA)

Swedish Code of Statutes

Update to cuts/changes to legal aid for immigration advice:

Human Rights. Resource Pack

COMMUNITY PROTOCOL FOR DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CASES

State University of New York at Potsdam. Workplace Violence Prevention Policy and Procedures

5. The Model Strategies and Practical Measures are aimed at providing de jure and de

ITS TIME TO TALK LAWS PROTECTING CHILDRENC F L FAMILY LAW. Presented by Maha Najjarine 20 February 2013

United Nations Committee against Torture

Akbar Maratovich Kogamov. Kazakh University of Humanities and Law, Astana, Kazakhstan

Academic Standards for Civics and Government

Are you living in fear? Is someone stalking you? STALKING is a crime in Minnesota! From the Office of Lori Swanson MINNESOTA ATTORNEY GENERAL

COMMERCIAL LENDERS MANDATED TO FIGHT WAR ON TERRORISM

How To Get A Law Passed In The United States

INTERNATIONAL HUMANITARIAN LAW AND PRISONERS OF WAR by

CROWN LAW STATUTORY OFFENCES REQUIRING THE CONSENT OF THE ATTORNEY-GENERAL

Dear Delegates, It is a pleasure to welcome you to the 2016 Montessori Model United Nations Conference.

Tunisia. New Constitution JANUARY 2015

Transcription:

Government Abuse of Power

The Center for Constitutional Rights The Center for Constitutional Rights is dedicated to advancing and protecting the rights guaranteed by the United States Constitution and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Founded in 1966 by attorneys who represented civil rights movements in the South, CCR is a non-profit legal and educational organization committed to the creative use of law as a positive force for social change. CCR uses litigation proactively to empower poor communities and communities of color; to guarantee the rights of those with the fewest protections and least access to legal resources; and to train the next generation of civil and human rights attorneys. Formed in order to work hand in hand with people s movements, CCR has lent its expertise and support to a wide range of movements for social justice. We are dedicated to defending the right to political dissent and combating the mass incarceration of both citizens and immigrants. We strive to complete the unfinished civil rights movement through targeting racial profiling and other modernday manifestations of racial and economic oppression and through combating discrimination that is based on gender or sexuality. For decades, CCR has pushed U.S. courts to recognize international human rights and humanitarian protections and we have had groundbreaking victories that established the principle of universal jurisdiction in this country and extended human rights standards to abuses committed by corporations and other nongovernment groups. The Center for Constitutional Rights was the first organization to fight for the rights of the men held at Guantánamo Bay and has been at the forefront of the battles to end the use of offshore prisons; to end the practice of extraordinary rendition and torture; and to restore the fundamental right of habeas corpus and due process under the law. George W. Bush signing the Military Commissions Act of 2006

Expansion of Executive Power The Center for Constitutional Rights has always understood the danger to liberty posed by a branch of government operating without limitations on its power. This is particularly clear today, when our executive branch is claiming it can disappear, torture and indefinitely detain people in the name of national security. Illegal Government Surveillance For decades, the U.S. government has used unlawful surveillance to monitor and intimidate activists and critics. CCR won a landmark decision in 1972 (U.S. v. U.S. District Court (Keith)) that struck down President Nixon s warrantless surveillance of domestic activists. Again today, our government is violating the U.S. Constitution by illegally wiretapping and data mining without warrants or judicial review. CCR is continuing to fight this type of over-reaching by the executive branch and is pressing the government for a full accounting of its domestic spying program. Secret Evidence: Abusing the State Secrets Privilege The state secrets privilege allows the executive to refuse to produce evidence in a court case, on the grounds that the evidence is secret information that would harm national security or foreign relations interests if disclosed. Part of the expansion of executive power since 9/11 has been the unprecedented increase in the use of the state secrets privilege to withhold evidence in cases that seek to hold the Bush administration accountable for its systematic violations of civil and human rights. Used as a trump card to disarm the courts and cover up government abuse of power, the state secrets privilege undermines our system of checks and balances by circumventing independent judicial review of the executive branch and allows the executive to essentially dictate to the federal courts which cases they can and cannot hear. Material Support: Guilt by Association CCR is working to challenge the material support statues and related schemes that make it illegal to provide support, including humanitarian aid, expert advice or political advocacy, to any foreign entity that the executive branch decides to designate as a terrorist group. These provisions violate the First Amendment and create guilt by association by criminalizing support solely intended to promote the lawful and non-violent activities of designated organizations.

Rendition Extraordinary rendition is the forced transfer of a person from one country to another in order to do what the law forbids torture the suspects to extract information. Since 9/11, the Bush administration has used extraordinary rendition to secretly abduct foreign nationals for detention and interrogation without judicial oversight as part of the so-called war on terror. Individuals are transferred into the custody of notorious human rights-abusing regimes for detention and interrogation by officials of that country or to secret overseas prisons run by the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency. Extraordinary rendition is illegal. Both the Convention Against Torture (CAT) and the International Convention of Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) prohibit torture and require states to prevent, investigate and punish acts of torture. CAT explicitly prohibits the transfer of a person to a country where there are substantial grounds for believing the person would be in danger of torture. CCR was the first organization to challenge an extraordinary rendition and is dedicated to ending this illegal practice. U.S. Military Aggression The Center for Constitutional Rights has consistently opposed illegal U.S. military aggression, beginning with suits filed against the war in Vietnam. Since that time we have challenged almost every war the U.S. government has engaged in. CCR has always insisted that any war (other than a war of self-defense) that does not have the consent of both the U.S. Congress and the U.N. Security Council is an illegal war.

Landmark Cases Drinan v. Ford (1975) Attempted to halt U.S. attacks on Cambodia through a challenge to presidential expansion of the war in Southeast Asia without congressional authorization. State of New York v. Danny White (1975) Fought New York State s attempts to evict Mohawk Indians from their land and challenged the jurisdiction of U.S. courts over American Indian land claims. Resulted in a settlement with the State. Horman v. Kissinger (1977) Exposed U.S. involvement in a coup by the Chilean junta in a lawsuit against U.S. officials present during the overthrow of Salvador Allende s government in 1973; asserted their involvement in the disappearance, torture and murder of Charles Horman, who observed U.S. naval support for the coup. Crockett v. Reagan (1983) Challenged U.S. military involvement in El Salvador in the first suit under the War Powers Resolution. Conyers v. Reagan (1983) Challenged the U.S. invasion of Grenada. Greenham Women Against Cruise Missiles v. Reagan (1985) Fought nuclear weapons proliferation; sought to use the U.S. legal system to enjoin the United States from deploying first use nuclear missiles in Great Britain. Linder v. Calero (1992) Exposed U.S. support for the Contras in Nicaragua as responsible for the 1987 murder of Benjamin Linder, an American community worker. 1992 decision won the right to sue for personal injury for war crimes. The U.S. refused to produce evidence in this case citing the state secrets doctrine. Dellums v. Bush (1990) Challenged George H. W. Bush s attempt to declare war unilaterally, without congressional authorization, during the first Gulf War. AFSC v. Brady (1992) Won the right to group travel to Vietnam and Cambodia. Finley v. NEA (1998) Represented Karen Finley in a challenge to the decency provision in government grants to artists; lost in an 8-1 Supreme Court decsion. Kiareldeen v. Reno (2001) Challenged the use of secret evidence in deportation trials. Cuba Travel Cases CCR s Cuba Travel Project is a clearinghouse for information about restrictions on travel to Cuba: providing advice to prospective travelers, representing those who have been accused of violating the travel ban and challenging the legality of government limitations on the ability of citizens to travel freely.

www.ccrjustice.org learn more about our work sign up for action alerts become a supporter