IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE NATURE OF THE ACTION

Similar documents
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORIGIA-~~T ~:J,-~T,>cURT SAVANNAH DIVISION j Ga. NATURE OF THE ACTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

Case 3:10-cv JAP -DEA Document 1 Filed 08/11/10 Page 1 of 6 PageID: 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA EASTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NATURE OF THE ACTION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA HARRISONBURG DIVISION EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA NATURE OF THE ACTION

Case4:13-cv DMR Document1 Filed12/11/13 Page1 of 5

Case 1:09-cv Document 1 Filed 12/10/09 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

unlawful employment practices on the basis of disabilityand to provide appropriate relief to

Case 1:13-cv ESH Document 1 Filed 12/09/13 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES

Case 1:12-cv RLV-AJB Document 1 Filed 05/14/12 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF HAWAII. Case No.: CV-06-00~CK-LEK

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 9 th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

Case 2:05-cv JDB-tmp Document 41 Filed 07/12/2006 Page 1 of 15

: : : : : : : : : : : x

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA NORFOLK DIVISION 2Dub APR - 3 PI: 41 COMPLAINT

Case 1:14-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 02/26/14 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

4:15-cv RBH Date Filed 01/29/15 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 10

No. Plaintiff Kelvin Bledsoe ( Plaintiff ), by his undersigned counsel, brings claims

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 1:16-cv Document 1 Filed 03/31/16 Page 1 of 7

Case 1:12-cv BEL Document 1 Filed 02/15/12 Page 1 of 6. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND (Northern Division)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA GREENVILLE DIVISION

Broadband Graphics - infringement of Patent Law and Procedure

Case3:15-cv Document1 Filed03/24/15 Page1 of 9

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA CONSENT DECREE. Introduction

Case 1:10-cv JBS -KMW Document 1 Filed 01/12/10 Page 1 of 21 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA CONSENT DECREE. Introduction

Plaintiff Carol Parker ( Plaintiff ), residing at 32 Coleman Way, Jackson, NJ 08527, by her undersigned counsel, alleges the following upon personal

Case 9:15-cv JIC Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/19/2015 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA. Case No.

Case 1:11-cv RHS-WDS Document 1-1 Filed 09/27/11 Page 1 of 2

Case 5:14-cv Document 1 Filed 07/11/14 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff, v. Windmill Inns of America, d/b/a Windmill Inn of Ashland, Defendant.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

- "'. --, ,-~ ') " UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA. Federal Trade Commission,

4:14-cv PMD Date Filed 06/10/14 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 10

Case 1:09-cv REB-MJW Document 1 Filed 12/18/09 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

Plaintiff Securities and Exchange Commission ("Commission"), for its Complaint against PRELIMINARY STATEMENT

Case4:15-cv DMR Document1 Filed09/16/15 Page1 of 11

Case 3:14-cv RNC Document 1 Filed 11/14/14 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 3:15-cv LAB-BLM Document 1 Filed 03/16/15 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Plaintiffs, Defendants. PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Plaintiff, Rebecca Weston, hereby accepts the Offer of

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF MARICOPA

defendant, Symphony Diagnostic Services, Inc. (doing business as MobilexUSA) ("Mobilex"),

Case 3:14-cv AC Document 10 Filed 03/26/14 Page 1 of 14 Page ID#: 43

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA AMENDED COMPLAINT I. INTRODUCTION

Case 2:02-cv WHA-SRW Document 1 Filed 09/17/2002 Page 1 of 5 , '\ IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

Case 1:13-cv Doc #1 Filed 09/30/13 Page 1 of 8 Page ID#1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

FIRST AMENDED CLASS ACTION AND COLLECTIVE COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND

Case 2:06-cv JF-SDP Document 69 Filed 02/25/2008 Page 1 of 15

PRELIMINARY STATEMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

Case 1:10-cv WGY Document 1 Filed 03/23/10 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Case 1:14-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 05/13/14 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 1:12-cv RPM Document 1 Filed 04/09/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CASE 0:12-cv RHK-TNL Document 1 Filed 09/14/12 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 2:10-cv JCM-LRL Document 1 Filed 07/22/10 Page 1 of 8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA

Plaintiff, : X. Nature of the Action. 1. This is an action for breach of a settlement agreement, retaliation

Case 3:14-cv HU Document 1 Filed 04/23/14 Page 1 of 12 Page ID#: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

Case 3:11-cv Document 1 Filed 06/30/11 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA

Case 1:10-cv Document 1 Filed 05/24/10 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA COMPLAINT

-C12oo ~ESLIE:,:MILLER -. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF PIMA. THE STATE OF ARIZONA ex ref. TERRY. No.

How to Write a Complaint

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT LAUDERDALE DIVISION CASE NO. COMPLAINT I. INTRODUCTION

Case 2:15-cv JNP Document 2 Filed 09/08/15 Page 1 of 10

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 2:07-cv LED Document 1-1 Filed 10/09/2007 Page 1 of 5

) CIVIL NO. v. ) WORLD CLASS NETWORK, INC., ) a Nevada corporation; ) COMPLAINT FOR ) RELIEF. DANIEL R. DIMACALE, an individual; )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

Case 1:15-cv XXXX Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/10/2015 Page 1 of 8

Case 1:13-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 01/04/13 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

Case 1:16-cv Document 1 Filed 05/03/16 Page 1 of 8

Case 2:14-cv DB Document 2 Filed 09/03/14 Page 1 of 10

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION COMPLAINT. Plaintiff United States of America ( United States"), alleges:

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

1. This is a civil action brought pursuant to the Uniformed Services Employment and. Reemployment Rights Act of 1994, 38 U.S.C ( USERRA ).

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff,

Fraud - Trading Commodity Futures

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT

Case5:15-cv NC Document1 Filed06/10/15 Page1 of 8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case 6:13 cv Document 1 Filed 10/03/13 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 1

COMPLAINT. The United States of America, acting under the direction of the Attorney

Case 1:14-cv WGY Document 1 Filed 05/16/14 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SOUTHERN DIVISION

Case 1:14-cv Document 1 Filed 07/14/14 Page 1 of 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION

Transcription:

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. COMPLAINT JURY TRIAL DEMAND NABSTAR, LLC d/b/a SLEEP INN, Defendant. NATURE OF THE ACTION This is an action trader the Age Discrimination in Employment Act to correct unlawful employment practices on the basis of age and to provide appropriate relief to Islyn I. Palmer who was adversely affected by such unlawful practices. As alleged with greater particularity in paragraph 7 below, the Commission alleges that Istyn Palmer, was discriminated against based on her age, 74, when she was terminated from her breakfast attendant position without notice, and was replaced by a 28 year-old employee. As a result of these discriminatory practices, Ms. Palmer suffered backpay losses. JURISDICTION AND VENUE 1. Jurisdiction of this Court is invoked pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 451, 1331, 1337, 1343 and 1345. This action is authorized and instituted pursuant to Section 7(b) of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, as amended, 29 U.S.C. 626 (b) (the "ADEA"), which incorporate by reference Sections 16(c) and 17 of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (the "FLSA"), as amended, 29 U.S.C. 215 (a)(3), 216(c) and 217. 2. The employment practices alleged to be unlawful were committed within the jurisdiction of the United States District Court for the District of Delaware.

PARTIES 3. Plaintiff, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (The "Commission"), is the agency of the United States of America charged with administration, interpretation and enforcement of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, and is expressly authorized to bring this action by Section 7(b) of the ADEA, 29 U.S.C. 626 (b), as amended by Section 2 of Reorganization Plan No. 1of 1978, 92 Stat. 3781, and by Public Law 98-532 (1984), 98 Star. 2705. 4. At all relevant times, Defendant, Nabstar, LLC d/b/a Sleep Inn, (the "Employer"), has continuously been doing business in the State of Delaware and the City of Newark and has continuously had at least 20 employees. 5. At all relevant times, Defendant Employer has continuously been an employer engaged in an industry affecting commerce within the meaning of Section 1 l(c) of the ADEA, 29. U.S.C. 630 (c). STATEMENT OF CLAIMS 6. More than thirty days prior to the institution of this lawsuit, Islyn Palmer filed a charge with the Commission alleging violations of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967. All conditions precedent to the institution of this lawsuit have been fulfilled. 7. Since at least January of 2003, Defendant Employer has engaged in unlawful employment practices at its Newark, Delaware facility, by unlawfully subjecting Islyn Palmer to disparate treatment based upon her age in violation of Section 7(b) of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, as amended, 29 U.S.C. 626 (b). These unlawful practices include, but are not limited to, the following:

(a) Ms. Palmer began her employment with Sleep Inn in August of I997 as a Breakfast Attendant in Defendant s Housekeeping Deparmaent. She was responsible for cleaning the breakfast and lobby areas, the public bathroom, and other common areas. (b) On or about August 4, 2003, the hotel was sold to Defendant, Nabstar, who then installed new management of the facility under General Manager, Joan Payne. Prior to the August 4, 2003 transfer of ownership, an orientation meeting was scheduled to introduce the staff to the new owners. Ms. Palmer was not notified of this meeting and therefore did not attend. (e) The weekend following the purchase of the hotei, Ms. Palmer arrived for her scheduled breakfast shift only to find that Defendant had scheduled a 28 year old employee to work Ms. Palmer s shift. When Ms. Palmer inquired of Defendant s management about why a new employee was working her shift and performing her prior duties, she was informed that because she was not listed as an employee, someone had filled her position. Defendant told her to fill out a job application, which Ms. Palmer completed. (d) The foilowing weekend of August 16-17 th, 2003, Ms. P~dmer again came into work only to find the same younger employee working in the position again. She spoke with management for a second time, and was told that both Ms. Palmer and the younger employee would work the shift together. (e) The same weekend, General Manager Payne met with Ms. Palmer about the duties of her position. Ms. Palmer informed Payne that she was willing and able to do the duties assigned to her position, and that she was also willing to work in other areas and departments.

(f) Despite Ms. Palmer s six years of satisfactory work performance at the facility, after working for Defendant for only one weekend, on August 20, 2003, Payne terminated Ms. Palmer without explanation. (g) In the six years that Ms. Palmer was employed at the facility, Ms. Palmer had never received any disciplinary actions, nor was she advised of any customer complaints about her work. 0a) Ms. Palmer was the oldest and most senior employee at 74 years of age at the facility when Defendant Nabstar assumed management. The next oldest employee was 39 years old. After Ms. Palmer s termination, Defendant permanently replaced Ms. Palmer with a 28 year old female employee. 8. The effect of the practices complained of in paragraphs 7(a) through (h) above has been to deprive Islyn Palmer of equal employment opportunities and otherwise adversely affect her status as an employee because of her age. 10. The unlawful employment practices complained of in paragraphs 7(a) through (h) above were intentional. 11. The unlawful employment practices complained of in paragraphs 7(a) through (h) were done with malice or with reckless indifference to the federally protected rights of Islyn Palmer. PRAYER FOR RELIEF Wherefore, the Commission respectfully requests that this Court: A. Grant a permanent injunction enjoining Defendant Employer, its officers,

successors, assigns, and all persons in active concert or participation with it, fi:om engaging in discrimination, and retaliation and any other employment practice which discriminates on the basis of age against individuals 40 years of age and older. B. Order Defendant Employer to institute and carry out policies, practices and programs which provide equal employment opportunities for individuals 40 years of age and older, and which eradicate the effects of its past and present unlawful employment practices. C. Order Defendant Employer to make whole Islyn Palmer by providing appropriate backpay with prejudgment interest, in amounts to be determined at trial, and other afflrmative relief necessary to eradicate the effects of its unlawful employment practices, including but not limited to, rightful-place reinst~ttement of Islyn Palmer, or frontpay, in lieu thereof, if reinstatement is not feasible. D. Pursuant to 29 U.S.C. 216 (b), order Defendant Employer to pay Islyn Palmer liquidated damages for its willful, malicious and reckless conduct described in paragraphs 7(a) through (h) above, in amounts to be determined at trial. Eo Grant such further relief as the Court deems necessary and proper in the public interest. F. Award the Commission its costs of this action.

JURY TRIAL DEMAND The Commission requests a jury trial on all questions of fact raised by its complaim. Respectfully submitted, ERIC S. DRIEBAND General Counsel JAMES L. LEE Deputy General Counsel GWENDOLYN YOUNG REAMS ~ "-~ ~ d ~ " Supervisory Trial Attome30.. ~ CH~L M. Sl~I~fi t Trial Attorney EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION Philadelphia District Office 21 South 5 th Street, Suite 400 Philadelphia, PA 19106 (215) 440-2642; (215) 440-2828 (FAX)

COLM F. CONNOLLY United States Attorney Dated: RUDOLPH/CONTRERAS Chief, Civil Division Assistant United States Attorney 1007 Orange Street Suite 700 Post Office Box 2046 Wilmington, DeIaware 19899-2046 (302) 573-6277